Pipeline Worm Floods AIM With Botnet Drones
Several reader write about a new AIM threat
dubbed the "AIM Pipeline Worm" that uses a sophisticated network of "chained" executables to attack the end user. Security Focus has a brief note. One anonymous reader writes: "Using this method, there is no starting point for the attack — a malicious link via IM can send you to any given file, at which point the path of infection you take depends entirely on the file you start off with. The hackers can then decide which order to install malicious software, depending on their needs at the time. At a bare minimum, you will become a Botnet Zombie — if you're really lucky, you might be Trojaned, have a Rootkit installed on your PC, and be used for spam, file storage, and DOS attacks. Unlike similar attacks that have been attempted in the past, the removal of a file from the chain will not stop the attack — you will simply end up with something else installed instead, in the form of a randomly named executable dumped in your system32 folder. You'll still spam an infection link to all your contacts."
the internet is a wonderful place
Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
Don't use IM software unless it's part of a closed, managed network. For example: www.omnipod.com is what we use for inter-office IM here. It's a closed network, and all files sent are automatically virus scanned before they can be received. Safe and effective, and keeps our employees from IM-ing with people outside the company.
Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
QUOTE (emphasis mine): How does this infection start off? As always, it begins with a seemingly innocent web address passed to you via Instant Messaging. Click the link and allow the file to execute and your day will quickly go bad."
The method used after that sound interresting, but nothing beat "trusting" executable being sent by any source, anonym or not , on email or AIM. Do that and SOONER or later your day will turn bad.
C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
visit randi.org
1- Don't run as an administrator.
2- Back up your profile regularly.
If you ever get bitten by something like this, it's easy to recover from.
... because it's a well known fact that most AOL users have higher than average internet savvy.
Now I have more reason than ever to install trillian/gaim on newb computers.
"I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
It's a Pipeline Worm. It's a good thing the internet is made up of tubes instead of pipes or we'd all be screwed!
What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
using aim is like being kicked in the balls
i support the right to offend.
It's free and open source. It's scaleable. It's easy to install and manage. It runs entirely on your own infrastructure so your messages aren't vulnerable to prying eyes and bored sysadmins of some other company. You can set it up to interoperate with any other IM system if you want to. There's a ton of open source clients available. Safe and effective, and keeps people from spending money on crap "solutions" that aren't.
- None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
I'm a student employed by the university to fix students' computers in my dorm building. Everyone will click on these links, some more than once. But why do I love these attacks? The hot chicks that will inevitably click the link. I love this job.
ur users do actually get alot of latitude with thier machines (programming shop, they have to have it) but there are certain things we do not allow. Public IM networks are one of them.
Having worked at a number of programming shops, that doesn't sound like a lot of latitude to me. If you can't install arbitrary software because of an AD policy and you audit people's machines it sounds like a very authoritarian place that does not trust the workers very much. Here we get a choice of computer brand (1 of 3), laptop or tower, any OS we want, and any software we feel like. We're also responsible for keeping our machines moderately secure. We have internal IRC servers and any IM we want is fine. Shop talk is encrypted by policy, either over Jabber or on top of a public network like AIM.
I think it is pretty darn useful. I have a lot of friends and colleagues on both of the aforementioned IM networks who I regularly consult and vice versus. This provides me with an additional resource as well as makes for a more relaxed atmosphere, like when I want to see if my girlfriend wants to meet me for lunch, or just want to chat with old college buddies. I think the fact that my company trusts me is a lot more valuable than tight security policies. Most serious compromises come from within. Because they trust me I'm happier and I'm also a lot less likely to sell them out. Contrary to what you may have heard, studies show the most effective motivation for not exploiting an employer is not fear of punishment or being fired or jail, but an ethical desire to not hurt those who trust you. If your company does not trust you (audits, arbitrary restrictions) then that motivation is removed.
Within the reach of a normal person, shift-right-click and Run As... will get you temporary and per-process administrator privileges without the insanity of running Internet Explorer as root.
Within the reach of an expert, RegMon and FileMon can point you to the isolated places where changing ACLs will allow the stupid program to run. The most frequent bug is for a program to try to write to one or a few protected locations.
lessee... /, bin, boot, debootstrap, dev, etc, home, initrd, lib, media, mnt, opt, proc, root, sbin, srv, sys, tmp, usr, var - nope, it's GONE!
Sacred cows make the best burgers.
Social lives, mind wandering = not at work.
Funny, I thought that when I was sitting at my desk, I was at work. What I'm actually doing at my desk has nothing to do with whether or not I am at work.
Oh, and by the way, open your eyes and read this:
What's Next: Stupid Productivity Tricks
You say you don't care if people walk around for a bit? Eat your words:
"recreational Web surfing has become a kind of mental floss for workers who spend their days sucking in a stream of work-related data that now comes in at a firehose pace--it's the information age equivalent of a walk around the block."
i am a soviet space shuttle
Yes, at some developer's desk.
Some brilliant programmer asked: What if the user of my messenger application, clicks on something? And his answer was: well, if it's a URL, download the file. [Ok, so far, so good. A little risky, but not totally stupid at first glance.]
Then the followup question was: what if the file turns out to be an executable program? And his answer was: execute it, of course! Oh, and with the same privileges as the user.
?!?! A problem between keyboard and chair, indeed.
As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
From the article: What's smart about this attack is that it doesn't matter if you get a file "out of step" - if you start off with a particular file out of sequence, you'll just end up somewhere else in the chain instead. There is no right or wrong place to start with this one - the hackers will make sure you get your fill of infection files!
The basic idea of using multiple, completely unrelated vulnerabilities and attacks to achieve total control is not exactly that new. In fact, the ideas that feel so obvious to us today were quite novel back in the turn of the century. Michael Zalewski described a worm prototype that worked in somewhat similar manner more than six years ago.
On the occasions that I get to give lectures about computer security, I try to illustrate these very ideas. The rule #1: There are no local exploits; All vulnerabilities are remote, some may just require a piggy-bag step of first delivering extra code via other holes.
There is no such thing as good luck. There is only misfortune and its occasional absence.