Slashdot Mirror


Giant Insect Invades Germany

Noryungi writes, "It seems the alien invasion of the Earth has just started! A 50-meter insect has been spotted roaming the German countryside! Let the 'I, for one, welcome our new giant insectoid overlords' joke contest begin!" A moderator at a Keyhole forum IDs the bug as a thrip, about 1mm long, squished under a glass plate during scanning.

62 of 264 comments (clear)

  1. No... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    It seems the alien invasion of the Earth has just started!

    No.. it's really Richard Branson's newest Eco-Friendly transportation mode. See, we'll strap seats to the backs of these giant genetically modified insects and they'll run us or fly us anywhere we want to go. What could possibly go wrong?

    microsoft europe strenuously denied it was a bug from their code, "ours are a few metres smaller."

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:No... by Rockinsockindune · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or we can plant a thumper (they are attracted to rythmic vibrations), and use hooks and ropes to climb to the tops of their backs.

      --
      I abuse commas, I cannot help myself.
    2. Re:No... by diablomonic · · Score: 4, Informative

      lets see, chemical to kinetic, hmmm.. battery efficiency: maybe 90% on each of charge and discharge, lets say 80% overall. electric motor efficiency, good ones are >90%. total efficiency: >70%. thousands of times more than this: 70,000% efficiency..... LISA! in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!

      --
      watch "the money masters" on google video
    3. Re:No... by griffjon · · Score: 5, Funny

      The European community have known about this bug (and there are many others) for years now. Why do you think they're so solidly against genetically modified food? This is a Thwips Monsantoi

      (btw, I'm joking, but just to be safe, I for one welcome our new genetically-modified-food-created insectile pooping overlords!)

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    4. Re:No... by malsdavis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But you missed several steps out, mainly the difficult part which involves generating and delivering energy to the batteries (which btw are an extra unnecessary step). Start off with a naturally available source of chemical energy and the efficiency rate will totally plummet.

      To prove the point: try find a car, (non-electric) train, plane or any form of mechanised transport which acheives >70% effiency!

      Lastly, something which is 1,000 times more efficient that a 70% efficient motor isn't 70,000% efficient, it is just extremely close to 100% efficient (which means that those annoying thermodynamic laws are kept in check).

    5. Re:No... by Sillygates · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --
      I fear the Y2038 bug
    6. Re:No... by Orange+Crush · · Score: 2, Funny
      If only bicycles were to ride on the roads, they'd only need to be 12 feet wide, very thin, and would last forever.

      They wouldn't last long under a stampede of 50 meter giant insects.

  2. Ich fur ein... by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... Willkommen unsere neuen Insekt overlords

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  3. Bugs! by The+Outbreak+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like Google Maps still has some bugs.

    1. Re:Bugs! by tonyr1988 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Time to bring it back to beta for a while . . .

    2. Re:Bugs! by stunt_penguin · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think they should leave this one in for posterity, and call it a feature......... as if anyone's going to take it's presence too seriously :)

      It's got more value as a cool link than a fixed bug.... I hope someone's got a sense of humor ^^

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  4. Joke contest? by captnitro · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Let the 'I, for one, welcome our new giant insectoid overlords' joke contest begin!

    Oh, let's not.

    Alternatively, everybody can get it out of their systems today if I never have to hear it again.
  5. Works great in Google Earth too by jessohyes · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just paste in 48.857699 ,10.205451

    Jess

    1. Re:Works great in Google Earth too by Psykosys · · Score: 2, Funny

      But do they have 3d data for it?

  6. Way to spoil the joke by spoco2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know... I don't think it was really neccessary to have right there in the heading the little note that it's some tiny bug squished during the scanning process.

    The fact it was posted with the Monty Python foot should be enough for anyone to know it shouldn't be taken seriously.

    We could have had hundreds, if not thousands, of posts as to exactly what it could all mean, how it got there, why it was taking a large dump at the time of the photo...

    But now... now you've ruined it.

    I hope you're happy... go and sit in the corner and think about what you've done.

    1. Re:Way to spoil the joke by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 3, Funny
      I don't think it was really neccessary to have right there in the heading the little note that it's some tiny bug squished during the scanning process.

      Of course it was. It's what they want us to think. If they didn't put that idea in our heads, we'd be free to think about what really happened.

    2. Re:Way to spoil the joke by nwbvt · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The fact it was posted with the Monty Python foot should be enough for anyone to know it shouldn't be taken seriously."

      So if they didn't include the Monty Python foot, people would have seriously thought there was a giant bug in Germany?

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    3. Re:Way to spoil the joke by mooingyak · · Score: 4, Funny

      Personally, I'm not entirely sold on this whole "insect stuck in the scanner" story. I smell coverup.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    4. Re:Way to spoil the joke by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 2, Funny

      New Volkswagon SUV?

      (Ok sorry, latenight at work)

    5. Re:Way to spoil the joke by ArtStone · · Score: 2, Funny

      And if you look just to the west of the Alien Bug, you'll see the town named Aalen.

      A coincidence? I think not.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  7. Other OB by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Re:Ich fur ein...... Willkommen unsere neuen Insekt overlords

    In Soviet Russia Google Maps bug YOU!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Other OB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      A real German would say:

      Wir heissen unsere Insektenüberlordschaften willkommen! :)

    2. Re:Other OB by PresidentEnder · · Score: 4, Funny
      Wir heißen unsere neue Insektenüberlordschaften willkommen!

      Letztes Jahr gab keine Insektenüberlordschaften.

      --
      I used to carry a bottle of whiskey for snake bite. And two snakes. -Nefarious Wheel
    3. Re:Other OB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The correct translation (as literal as possible, as interpreting as necessary) is:
      "Ich zumindest heisse unsere neuen Insektenoberherrscher willkommen!"

      I = Ich
      for one = zumindest (in this context)
      welcome = heisse ... willkommen
      our = unsere
      new = neuen
      insect over-lords = Insekten-ober-herrscher

    4. Re:Other OB by Lane.exe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sagen sie! Im Amerika gibt es ein Insekt overlord für sechs Jahre!

      --
      IAALS.
    5. Re:Other OB by Traa · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought you guys got rid of that "ß" thingy (eszett?) a while back?

    6. Re:Other OB by Minwee · · Score: 4, Funny

      You wouldn't believe how many of those things are still filling up warehouses out in the country. Now that nobody wants them for official use any more they're practically free and poor people have been making up new words to use as many of them as they can.

    7. Re:Other OB by JayAEU · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wir heißen unsere neuen Insektenüberlordschaften willkommen!

      Gotta match the numerus on that adjective with the subject there... I like the sharp-s though. :)

  8. absolutely preposterous by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    we all know giant (fill-in-the-blank) overlords always appear in japan first, specifically in tokyo

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  9. fun by sporkme · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here are two Escher-licious images from google maps:
    Boston
    Dallas

    ...and an interesting effect that can occur when frames are spliced:
    Sidewalk ends

    Of course, there are tons of these, including the popular ipod.

    1. Re:fun by babbage · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One of my favorites is Versailles. Yes, that Versailles.

      Did you realize that the world's most famous palace, it's grounds, and the community in front of it are laid out like an enormous happy-face stick figure? Take a look at that aerial photo, then go back and look at the Google view -- it's obvious once you look for it. And this all goes back to, what, 1500s and earlier?

      It almost makes you think that the French first sent people up in hot-air balloons just so that they'd get a chance to see the joke that architects & urban planners had set up centuries earlier...

      :-)

  10. From the Googleplex by NetDrain · · Score: 5, Funny

    But from the Corp network, we have:

    http://theblight.net/misc/germany.jpg

    The Maps team is going to be -pissed.- It'll be awesome.

  11. This is News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    If i step on a bug with my sneaker, take a picture of it and upload it to the internet, will I make the front page of slashdot too?

  12. 'Bugzilla' users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ok, so that's what they meant when they said they were using an in-house version of Bugzilla ?

  13. That's Not a Bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's a fucking feature, alright?

    1. Re:That's Not a Bug by Lord+Ender · · Score: 3, Funny

      And here I thought you were going for "It's a space station!"

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  14. Re:Ooops Wrong Link by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 2, Insightful
    --
    -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
  15. during "scanning"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    who the hell would "scan" satellite pictures? this should be digital, morons. hello, it's 2006.

    1. Re:during "scanning"?? by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most of the high-resolution imagery on Google Earth is from aerial photograpy not satellites, and even in 2006 the vast majority of that is still shot on positive-color film. Satellites are sexy and high-tech, but not the most cost-effective way to get very high reolution true-color images.

      Now the fuzzy, false-color "aww, they don't have good pics of this area" imagery *is* from a satellite (Landsat 7, IIRC).

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
  16. Fark had a thread of wierd finds last week by gmezero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink =2294440

    There are some really great shots in that thread as well
    as some co-ordinates to follow up on. One is a wierd land
    area in New Mexico where some scammers had built out all
    the roads for an entire city development and then skipped
    out with the money and never built a thing.

    Very wierd stuff.

  17. figures. by not+a+cylon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well that's what happens when Google tells their employees to spend 20% of their time doing whatever interests them. Giant, mutant, killer insects.

    Damn Ph.D's, with their genome maps and fancy internet tubes.

  18. Re:I checked the photo and by doti · · Score: 3, Informative

    Zoom out, put in map mode, and you'll se it's in the same country as Berlin, so it's Germany.

    --
    factor 966971: 966971
  19. Re:U.S. Action soon to take place by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wait!!! The UN should threaten sanctions agains the insect first. We must also be sensitive and careful not to hurt the insect's feelings. Or our actions may provoke more insect insurgency. Surely the insect will respond to diplomacy. We should try talking to the insect before we fight. The insect probably doesn't understand that we respect it and mean it no harm.

  20. With apologies to Kafka... by yuriismaster · · Score: 5, Funny
    As Gregor Samsa woke one morning from uneasy dreams he found himself in his bed, transformed into a monstrous insect.

    ...and invaded Germany.
  21. Nothing to see here, move along by naoursla · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is just Google's new crawler.

  22. The Yukon/Alaska Black Box by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you tell us what this is hiding, will they have to kill you?

    1. Re:The Yukon/Alaska Black Box by Osty · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you tell us what this is hiding, will they have to kill you?

      As far as I can tell, it's hiding nothing. Does that mean I have to die now?

    2. Re:The Yukon/Alaska Black Box by idonthack · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Examine the edges and surrounding areas. It looks like it's just a hole where four sections came together.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  23. Re:I checked the photo and by Main+Gauche · · Score: 3, Funny

    "That doesn't look anything like Germany."

    Because in Germany, bugs don't leave their excrement in the middle of a nice clean field like that?

    Ok, I admit it. You got modded both +1 Funny and +1 Informative, and I'm left very confused. Not by the usual random moderation, mind you, but by what I'm supposed to be thinking right now....

  24. You're right! by idonthack · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nobody over there actually names things in German. That's just a myth.
    I hear "Kugeltalstraße" is a really popular Chinese street name. Yep, sure looks like China to me.

    --
    Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  25. Nice try, Google... by gd23ka · · Score: 3, Funny

    but it's yet only another marketing ploy. Wait till you see Snoopy or Scooby Doo turn up
    on the map, or they start the Google Maps Treasure Hunt next year.

  26. Re:Germans subpoena Google by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other news, world renowned military strategist, The Ghost of Sir Basil Liddel-Hart has commented that the bug made a major strategic flaw. "He, and we are assuming this bug to be a 'he' made a serious error." Sir Basil's Ghost, said. "Making his initial landfall target in one of the most millitarily keen nations the world has ever seen was a very poor idea. Because of this mistake the bug has triggered the full mobilisation of the german armed forces and a full scale search and destroy mission has been initiated by the Luftwaffer. My own strategic analysis of the situation leads me to conclude that the bug would have done better to land across the border in France where he would have been almost immediately surrendered to and would have been able to demand any surrender terms he so desired. My advice to the bug now would be to make for France with all haste and use the freshly-surrendered French army to fight the Germans." When queried about how long the French army could be expected to hold out against the most dedicated military machine in the world Sir Basil's Ghost spluttered into his tea and continued: "Oh good gracious me no. The plan wasn't for the French to FIGHT the germans, no-one would expect that and if the French actually tried firing back the Germans would just laugh anyway. No the idea is that the French will immediately surrender again (as is to be expected) and dealing with all the PoW's will hinder the panzer divisions persuing the bug. This should give him the time necessary to hop across the channel and claim asylum in Britain. I hear the benefits are very good".

    In a further development, Russia has started to mobilise its troops onto it's western border in anticipation of a German attack. President Putin said: "Germany has a history of doing this, they did it in the first world war and they also have a history of ripping off old first world war battle plans for use again."

    Asked to step in and resolve the situation by bombing the lot of them back to the stone-age, President George W. Bush said "It is not the policy of the US Government to interfere in the internal issues of sovereign states. We also don't bomb places that don't end in -stan or start with an 'I'" he said, "It's apples and grapefruits really. None of our turtlewax."

    --
    FGD 135
  27. Upping the ante, eh? by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is just Google's new crawler.

    Clearly a mere robots.txt is not going to help against this...we're gonna need real robots! Giant ones!!

    --
    Soylent Green is peoplicious!
  28. My wife's pun by Fortran+IV · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's definitely not the lesser of two weevils.

    (My wife is an incorrigible punster. I try not to incorrige her.)

    --
    I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
  29. Forgive me, but... by alienmole · · Score: 4, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new overlord-joke hating overlords!

  30. Of course he's not alone! by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    None of us are! There's a giant fucking bug out there!

  31. Google Sightseeing by Anonymous+Cumshot · · Score: 4, Informative
    Google Sightseeing (the site from which the submitter likely found the giant bug) has lots of similar mishaps chronicled...

    Including boobies!

    --
    Best regards, A.C.
  32. "incremental efficiency" vs "absolute efficiency" by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the creature containing the cells serves some other purpose other trhan converting food into raw energy then one should not measure efficiency in such absolute terms.

    Say a human being is only 30% efficient in converting food to energy/"work". Given the human already needs a certain amount of food to stay alive, one should also measure the additional amount of food the human needs to do an additional amount of work.

    --
  33. wrong way by Smoking · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey dude, turn left, Oktoberfest is definitely not this way...

  34. Satellites have scanners? by BlueMonk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Someone enlighten me. I was under the impression that these images were coming directly from Satellite images. Maybe I was misled by the fact that the button on the map that says what mode it is in says "Satellite". Am I to believe that there are people physically getting these images on paper, putting them in a scanner and scanning each square of Google's whole database of images from earth's surface!? Of course if there were actual people involved, you'd think they would have noticed this, but even an automated process seems ridiculous to me... why would these images ever be in physical form?

    1. Re:Satellites have scanners? by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative
      Someone enlighten me. I was under the impression that these images were coming directly from Satellite images. Maybe I was misled by the fact that the button on the map that says what mode it is in says "Satellite".

      You are correct - Google has misled you by implying that all the photographs came from satellite imagery, when in fact much of it came from aerial photography.
       
       
      Am I to believe that there are people physically getting these images on paper, putting them in a scanner and scanning each square of Google's whole database of images from earth's surface!?

      Google buys its input from a wide variety of companies - most of whom do the digitization themselves and then sell the digital files to Google. I suspect the companies do the digitizing themselves for their own purposes and later resell the data to Google. So, yes - there are a bunch of people taking a stack of paper and scanning it, but it's a distributed project across a bunch of companies across a bunch of years. (Google recently added 'new' [to Google] high res imagery of my area - imagery that's actually nearly five years old.)
       
       
      why would these images ever be in physical form?

      Because not everything is done direct to digital. High resolution large format negative are (for this purpose) still better than their digital equivalents.