Slashdot Mirror


PS3 OS Wasn't Final at TGS

LifesBlood writes "The PlayStation 3 operating system used at the Tokyo Game Show was apparently not final. Sony confirmed to GameDaily BIZ that the company has been in the process of finalizing it and that just like the Wii's OS, it will be upgradeable in the future." From the article: "We were told that this should not affect PS3 production whatsoever. Moreover, SCEA does not believe that the state of the OS at TGS had anything to do with the system resets or other glitches that some witnessed. Sony reiterated that it was the confined cases and other unfriendly trade show conditions that caused problems with the consoles. In addition, Sony said it has the capability to upgrade the PS3's OS after the console launches through its online network, memory stick files or Blu-ray discs."

81 comments

  1. No biggie, still over a month left! by Babbster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why would we be worried that the PS3 software isn't ready to go when the hardware specs weren't even final until recently? I mean, software is easy, right? Besides, nobody would mind if they had to update their PS3's operating system to get it to work properly. After all, game consoles don't cost that much that we should expect perfection...

    1. Re:No biggie, still over a month left! by Wingmanjd01 · · Score: 1

      Software is NOT easy

    2. Re:No biggie, still over a month left! by Aladrin · · Score: 2
      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  2. Sony copies Nintendo... again by Veilrap · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nintendo's controller is better than ours... SIXsux Nintendo's OS is better than ours... um Lets upgrade too!

    1. Re:Sony copies Nintendo... again by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this type of thing has never happened before. Especially not on the 360 or the Xbox. Oh and I'm sure Nintendo and Sony never updated the firmware shipped with the PS2 or Cube as time went on...

    2. Re:Sony copies Nintendo... again by sirstar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Next there going to put 4 ps2 controller connections on the PS3 and claim it was their idea......

    3. Re:Sony copies Nintendo... again by Darundal · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I'm sure Nintendo and Sony and Microsoft never charged $500-$600 for their console, either...

    4. Re:Sony copies Nintendo... again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they did for PSP so ...

    5. Re:Sony copies Nintendo... again by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      Don't reply to my posts if you're just going to babble on about an unrelated topic. Thanks.

  3. Is it just me... by varunnangia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...or wasn't the entire point of video game consoles to avoid the hassles and pains involved in ensuring everything was up-to-date on your computer? As far as it goes, Microsoft's Xbox update process is pretty painless, and if Sony learns from that, theirs should be as well. That said, I really liked not having to update my Famicom's OS.

    1. Re:Is it just me... by sqlrob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nope, that's why I went to consoles.

      And I don't want any of my consoles hooked to the net, period. If it needs updates, I likely won't purchase it.

    2. Re:Is it just me... by Babbster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would think the main problem is the implication (who knows if it's true) that the OS hasn't been fully tested (how could it be if the software isn't finalized?). If, for example, the PS3 is released and requires an update out of the box to fix a problem, then the buyer would have to find a way to get that update, such as by connecting the box to the Internet, even if that buyer had no initial intention of doing so. While I recall hearing about X360 hardware problems, I don't remember many (any) complaints about how the software worked out of the box.

      While it's hard to imagine someone spending $500-600 on a PS3 and then not connecting it to the Internet (where, presumably, OS updates would come through automagically), still, if there are showstopping OS bugs left when the PS3 ships then people are [rightly] going to be upset.

    3. Re:Is it just me... by brkello · · Score: 1

      No, the point of consoles was that they were cheaper than PCs and easier to develop for because you only had one set of hardware specs. Consoles are becoming more complicated...integrating browsers and online content. Since the OS has become more complicated, there are bound to be bugs and feature add-ons in the future. As far as just playing single player games, it shouldn't be an issue. If any game has a problem with an OS, they would just roll out a patch with the game.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    4. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We also really liked not having to update your Famicom's OS.

      Cheers,

      First4Internet

    5. Re:Is it just me... by wpanderson · · Score: 1

      Presumably Sony could ship firmware updates on Official PlayStation Magazine cover discs for those not wanting to put their PS3 online, else consumers (at least in the UK) could return their box as not being fit for purpose if an out-the-box update was required to make it usable.

      --
      neuro at well dot com (when I post, it's my opinions, no-one elses)
    6. Re:Is it just me... by Babbster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hardware returns (for at least a month at decent retailers) are pretty easy in the US, too. And, yes, there will be many ways to update the OS (as Sony indicates) besides the Internet. It just seems like another bad sign for a console that already takes an Internet PR beating every week. I would also wonder whether this non-finalized OS affects developers. I'm not sure how Sony is handling their interface, but on the X360 there are parts of the Dashboard (such as music playback, XBL messaging and such) that are available at all times. In fact, with Dead Rising (one of the three "big-box" games I've played so far) the game "knows" whether or not you're playing music and will mute the cutscenes (while retaining subtitles) if you're on either play or pause in the music player. It could be pretty ugly if game developers use an aspect of the OS that turns out to be buggy or changed when their game actually hits the streets.

      Ah well, as with anything, we won't know jack until people actually have the boxes in their homes. Release week will be a lot of fun for we onlookers, and hopefully for the people who buy the system, too. :)

    7. Re:Is it just me... by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      Have fun not purchasing any software anymore then.

      Bugs are just a fact of life when dealing with any nontrivial program. Personally I'd rather have the ability to download an update compared to having to just deal with it or worse purchase a disc with the updates (I'm looking at you, Morrowind for Xbox)

      The QA process should still be treated like you can't release future updates, but denying that ability altogether is just stupid.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    8. Re:Is it just me... by Hangin10 · · Score: 1

      You have a good point there. I bought Prey before finding out it doesn't have split screen death match; it's multiplayer is online only. Wouldn't it be easier to write a split screen death match than deal with networking code et al?

    9. Re:Is it just me... by DrXym · · Score: 1
      The PSP had a very painless firmware update system. I expect that the PS3 will learn and improve upon that process.

      I fully expect that the pirates / homebrewers will manage to brick a few systems just like they did with the PSP but that will be their own fault.

    10. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I really liked not having to update my Famicom's OS.

      As it has become possible to update computer games via the Internet, computer games have become steadily buggier. I don't think this is an accident.

      Expect plenty of shoddy work and disappointment in the next generation of consoles.

    11. Re:Is it just me... by sqlrob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So you're saying I need to wire my house because of the crap Sony et. al want to pull? Wireless doesn't work very well downstairs, not at all near the consoles.

      There's still plenty of PS2/GC/XBox games I need to play, I don't need to go to the next gen for a long time.

    12. Re:Is it just me... by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. It's one thing to update the online component of the system and quite another to update the OS in order for games to play properly. The former is understandable and acceptable. I don't know if Microsoft periodically updates their xbox live system but it wouldn't bother me if they did. But if I buy a wii and don't happen to have it hooked up to the internet on day one, I'd be ticked if I couldn't play a game I bought.

    13. Re:Is it just me... by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      What I'm saying is plenty of those last-gen games also have bugs. Hell, I can't count the number of times Perfect Dark hard-locked on my N64. If the older systems supported updates, you wouldn't have to deal with them once a patch is released.

      I'd doubt that any game more complex than an early Atari 2600 title can claim to have shipped bug free.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    14. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying I need to wire my house because of the crap Sony et. al want to pull?

      If you are really against networking your console, maybe there's a possibility of being able to have it updated via DVD.

    15. Re:Is it just me... by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      Also, assuming you don't want to play online, you can keep playing your next-gen games offline with no updates like you always have. It's just an advantage to have it hooked up. The last numbers I heard had the Xbox 360 pegged at about 50% connected to the internet with about 35% being active members of Xbox Live (a.k.a. paid Gold accounts). Clearly this shows that you don't need to be online with a next-gen console.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    16. Re:Is it just me... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      1) The PSP's update is pretty painless as well, and it seems the PS3 interface is based on that.
      2) Your Famicom didn't *have* an OS, it just had a firmware. And it was effectively updated, since each cart would include its own OS code.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    17. Re:Is it just me... by sqlrob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More my concern is that console developers will get the "ship then patch" mentality that pervades the PC realm. It already looks to be happening (King Kong too dark on SD, unreadable Dead Rising fonts on SD, Oblivion problems)

    18. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "While I recall hearing about X360 hardware problems, I don't remember many (any) complaints about how the software worked out of the box."

      Only the backwards compatibility list that was short of many great Xbox games.

    19. Re:Is it just me... by wolrahnaes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll give you the King Kong and Dead Rising SD problems, though I'd attribute that to retarded testing procedures at the developer, publisher, and Microsoft QA levels. If they had seriously tested the game on all four supported resolutions as one would expect them to, the problem would have been obvious. The responses I've seen from the developers of both of those games are not indicative of a "patch it later" attitude, rather more of an "oh shit, we forgot to test that!".

      Oblivion problems, well those are to be expected. The same thing happened with Morrowind on Xbox, but there they did not have a way to release updates. The original version had a fatal flaw that caused constant crashing if your save file got large. As the save file size was directly proportional to the level of clutter in your game, people like me who kept a lot of crap around their in-game houses got huge saves. At one time mine was over 20MB. This made the game so unplayable that I quit until the Game of the Year Edition release with the expansions and all the patches from the PC version to date was released. That fixed all the major issues and made the game playable again (I finally finished the main quest), but it cost $30 and honestly I haven't played the expansion quests enough to consider them worth it. If the Xbox version had a Live-based patching mechanism like Oblivion on 360 does, I'd probably have downloaded a patch long before my save file got large enough to encounter the problem.

      The ability to patch after release is a very good thing, but the console makers need to enforce strict rules of QA before allowing production of the title to prevent "patch-it-later" syndrome.

      You're looking at this pessimistically, believing that this system will be abused by developers to release a beta-grade game and fix it later, though that position is validated by the current situation with some PC games. I'm taking a more optimistic position and noting that people with SD screens who bought King Kong or Dead Rising would just have been fucked if there wasn't a patch mechanism in place. The control the console makers hold over the release of titles is what I hope will prevent the patch problems you fear, where those controls are nonexistant in the PC world where anyone can release a game to retail in any state.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    20. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Famicom didn't even have firmware. It just executed whatever was in the cartridge slot.

    21. Re:Is it just me... by Lectrik · · Score: 1
      Ah well, as with anything, we won't know jack until people actually have the boxes in their homes.

      Future News from December :
      Sony announces "controller design still not finalized. We should have our heads out of our asses by boxxing day."

      Release week will be a lot of fun for wii onlookers, and hopefully for the people who buy the system, too. :)

      Sorry, had to fix that
      --
      --- As to make my comment seem, by comparison, more intelegent... doodie doodie doodie poop poop poop!
    22. Re:Is it just me... by speeDDemon+(nw) · · Score: 1

      You would think with all the 'Q&A' they supposedly do that someone would have turned the console to Standard Definition atleast once in the Q&A faze... I have seen both the problems you are mentioning, another is that their is no 'hole' in Tiger Woods golf in SD. I had planned on updating to a HD display in the future however these bugs have definately sped up my plans.

    23. Re:Is it just me... by ArwynH · · Score: 1

      Um...No, it isn't.

    24. Re:Is it just me... by NekoXP · · Score: 1

      Your Famicom didn't have an 'OS'. On reset, the CPU jumped to an address in memory which just so happened to be exactly where the cartridge was hardwired to be.. :)

      The entire point of video game consoles is NOT to avoid updating them. The entire point of video game consoles is to have a video game device on your TV or in your entertainment center. If it has an OS? So be it. These days it needs one at least to throw up a menu, connect to the internet for multiplayer (unless every game wants it's own TCP/IP stack..) and maybe play some media files. Even memory card management would come under this.

      You know the Playstation went through several OS revisions, as did the Playstation 2. There was NO way to upgrade it without buying a new system (Sony did not have an upgrade program :) and if you had an old firmware.. well.. if you wanted the HD attachment you may have been screwed. Some cheapshit memory cards quit working on newer ones, some DVDs don't play on older ones. I would say that is a lot more hassle than "connect to the net and transparently update" as most games consoles are wont to do these days.

    25. Re:Is it just me... by Phisbut · · Score: 2
      Hell, I can't count the number of times Perfect Dark hard-locked on my N64. If the older systems supported updates, you wouldn't have to deal with them once a patch is released.

      They will fix bugs alright, but it all depends on your definition of "bug". If your system can run emulators to have it play games rather than watch UMD movies (*cough* PSP *cough*), then it is a "bug" and you bet it will be "patched" soon. That's the kind of patching they want, not the kind that actually makes the console more usable.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    26. Re:Is it just me... by Hangin10 · · Score: 1

      I'm a programmer myself, and I'd rather write split screen than a networked multiplayer.

    27. Re:Is it just me... by phorm · · Score: 1

      Or just attach them to various games. If a game is known to need a hardware update, ship it something that checks the current kernel/firmware version and does an easy update. The big issue would be around
      a) Making sure nobody powers down the unit mid-upgrade (bad)
      b) Making sure the upgrade doesn't create new bugs (really bad)

    28. Re:Is it just me... by ArwynH · · Score: 1

      It's not just the programmer that's involved though.

      From the programming perspective the hardest part is the multi-player code after that networking and/or split screen is pretty easy. I suspect the system libraries take care of the hard stuff anyway.

      The main difference with split screen and network is not with the programming it's with the art direction and QA. With a network version the screen is the same as the single player version, so everything can be re-used. With a split screen, the screen real-estate is halved, so some things will have to be re-worked, re-designed and more heavily tested. Basicly it comes to a lot of work for a feature that only a few people want, so they just don't bother and save money.

    29. Re:Is it just me... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Yes but netcode can be even worse since it introduces an entirely new part to the engine. Splitscreen is basically rendering two viewpoints, handling multiple input devices and rearranging the HUD, splitscreen games aren't going to desync, lag or cause other errors network games have had over the years. Problems with splitscreen are obvious, problems with netcode can be a bitch to track down.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    30. Re:Is it just me... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Sony already updates the PSP firmware regularly by putting the update software on the game discs. I don't expect this to end up differently.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    31. Re:Is it just me... by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      I know, but you can't blame them for that. It is in fact a bug, and while said bug is unlikely to cause gameplay problems it could be considered a security hole. I install modchips and softmods for alcohol money (there's a lot of people on a college campus who want homebrew) so I have to say this is a wacky theory from way out in left field, but being a widely distributed platform it could possibly become a target for malware.

      Let's consider this scenario. It's unlikely as hell, but entirely possible.
      -Person finds memory stick laying on the ground labelled "PSP"
      -Person pops memory stick in to their PSP, sees an unlabeled application
      -App takes advantage of the PSPs ability to multitask and loads in the background, connecting to any available WiFi APs and turning the PSP in to a spam drone any time its near an access point, until the device is fully powered down. If other memory sticks are inserted, it spreads to those.

      Granted it's not worth the effort for spammers to attack PSPs due to the unpredictability of when they're available and the ease of finding open relays and rooted Windows boxes, but the point is this is a possible scenario and a legitimate justification of fixing the homebrew-enabling holes from a security perspective rather than a business perspective. This kind of thing could possibly actually become a real worry if the Wii ends up being remote-exploitable, since it is intended to be running in some state 24/7 and would likely have network access at all times through its WiFi.

      Out of the existing network-patchable consoles (Xbox, Xbox 360, PSP) while both the Xbox and PSP have seen anti-softmod patches delivered, both have also had updates that add features (PSP web browser for example) and improve the gameplay experience (Halo 2 anti-cheat patches). So far it appears the 360 has had the friendliest patches, only adding features and fixing real bugs while not in any way affecting those of us with modified DVD firmware (though some claim the updates killed their Xboxes, based on the previous posts of most of those users they had impending hardware failure anyways).

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    32. Re:Is it just me... by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      The entire point of video game consoles is NOT to avoid updating them. The entire point of video game consoles is to have a video game device on your TV or in your entertainment center.

      You missed a big part: That is as easy to use as the TV it is attached to. Having to worry about upgrades negates that.

    33. Re:Is it just me... by NekoXP · · Score: 1

      But you're missing the whole POINT; Consoles were never designed in the first place to "allow people to play games without upgrades".

      Maybe that is the advantage of a console for a lot of PC Gamers TODAY, but when consoles first arrived.. who had a PC? Who had to upgrade the OS to play the games anyway?

  4. Sony vs. Nintendo. by Inoshiro · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nintendo implies it'll upgrade the Wii OS over time to add new features and ensure that the Wii is part of the whole entertaiment system setup they're selling.

    With Sony, it seems the reason they are mentioning that they can update the OS is to deal with bugs they expect to give to consumers in exchange for their hard-earned dollars.

    Gee, thanks, Sony.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Sony vs. Nintendo. by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      I'm hoping that, failing this happening before launch, Nintendo will release an update to change "Wii" to, say, anything else. I can carve letters into the box, but it will still have Wii in the boot screen.

    2. Re:Sony vs. Nintendo. by brkello · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uhh, I am sure both Sony and Nintendo have this ability to release feature updates and fix bugs. There were some OS issues with some PS3s that were on display, so it is logical that they presented this ability in that context. Or are you saying Nintendo is implying that it won't fix bugs? You fanboys make no sense.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    3. Re:Sony vs. Nintendo. by nog_lorp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Parent has a good point. Are you claiming Sony cannot introduce new features, and will not have an "Whole entertainment system setup"? It seems you are implying that only PS3 has bugs, and only Wii can have new features.

    4. Re:Sony vs. Nintendo. by Discordian_Eris · · Score: 1

      Very true. The last thing the console industry needs to do is follow the path that so many PC game makers have. Release, sell buttloads of the game, then patch it to a functional state. We've all seen too many games like that. Eris

    5. Re:Sony vs. Nintendo. by Babbster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I won't pretend to be able to speak for the OP (or his "gaming politics") but my inference from what he said is that Sony is putting a spin on this that is unnecessarily bad. While Nintendo announces that their OS is upgradeable so that consumers get new features, Sony announces that their OS was a) not final at a very recent trade show (with only about 2 months to launch) and b) upgradeable to fix potential problems.

      It would be like me running a deli and telling a customer that it'll take me about 10 minutes to make their sandwich because I have to finish some fresh meatballs, while the guy running the deli next door tells the customer it'll take about 10 minutes because he has to make sure his meatballs haven't gone bad. :)

    6. Re:Sony vs. Nintendo. by Babbster · · Score: 1

      PS - I should also note that this spin could be entirely attributable to the author of the article, or, for that matter, to my own prejudices (I have them, though I try to suppress them and be fair). :)

    7. Re:Sony vs. Nintendo. by brkello · · Score: 1

      I believe it is just article spin as Slashdot is heavily biased. The OP just spun it to the next level. It's pretty clear to any rational person that they both can update and add features/fix bugs. I guess I don't really have a bias when it comes to consoles. I have all three in my house and have enjoyed all of them. I never buy the first rev of something and always wait for a price drop. I think it is just how irrational the majority of people act on here about Nintendo that forces me to reply. They are just being stupid consumers when they state: "I'm getting the Wii and buying one for my sister and parents. Wii's for everyone!". And then in the next breath say they can't afford to buy a PS3. Then how can you buy 6 Wii's? In any case, I am looking forward to the competition. I really feel if it wasn't for Sony and MS, Nintendo would have never come up with their cool new controllers and would have ignored putting their console online. Hell, we'd probably still be playing games on cartridges. But now Nintendo has turned things around on them. It will be fun to see how it all turns out!

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    8. Re:Sony vs. Nintendo. by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, the difference between Sony and Nintendo is that Nintendo is better at marketing the same exact features.

    9. Re:Sony vs. Nintendo. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Don't pull that. Sony's track record with OS updates is proven, in the PSP. PSP updates ad features and shut-down homebrew hacks, which is precisely what you'll see Nintendo do. There is little reason to believe the PS3 will be different, aside from blind fanboyism.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    10. Re:Sony vs. Nintendo. by Creep73 · · Score: 1

      If you walked into a deli and they informed you that your meal would take 10 minutes, because they wanted to make sure the meat had not gone bad, would you still eat there? I can't say that I would. I appreciate the candid statement but it would probably kill my appetite. It doesn't kill the appetite of a Sony fanboy though.

      No matter what happens, massive amounts of people will buy the PS3. Even now the fanboys are coming out of the woodwork to defend the honor of their precious PS3. Sony could announce that it doesn't work at all and they could still push out units.

      I can't say if the PS3 will be the product Sony says it will be. Sony does make some good products though I try to avoid them if I can. Their goodness isn't worth the cost in most cases. That and I can't stand Sony as a company. Perhaps I am still bitter about that minor rootkit issue. oh well.

  5. Increased / Easier Modability? by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

    It sounds like having usb-stub or network updates supported would make it vastly easier to mod it. All it would then require would be reversing the update formats, rather than opening up the box and such. Ofcourse, it depends on how the patches work / what mechanisms are available.

  6. Unification of PC and console by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm afraid that while the new consoles brag how adaptable and updateable they are, they'll lose the very advantage of being a console (no need to reiterate, you know the story).

    At the same time Vista is going full-speed into unification and standardization of game interfaces, technologies, ratings and even unification of the hardware (you know DX10 is much stricter and there's no "we support 80% of DX10" - you either support all or none).

    Xbox 360 has for it media center hub functionality, slick integration with Windows CE mobiles and XP/Vista (Live Anywhere), and sane price.

    Wii has a unique approach to gaming and control interfaces.

    I wonder what PS3 has. Fast processor and updateable OS? Well I have this on my PC.
    The thing that keeps PS3 going (I hope) will be the brand loyalty, and, with some luck, some good exclusive games.
    Tough call for Sony, but I wish them good luck with it, if even only for the good old times.

    1. Re:Unification of PC and console by oGMo · · Score: 1, Funny
      I wonder what PS3 has.
      Games.
      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    2. Re:Unification of PC and console by nickyj · · Score: 1

      You forgot the Blu-ray movies! I can't wait to buy all my movies again in HD Blu-ray! NOT!

      --
      Causing Chaos Everywhere,
      Nik J.
      The strange world of a loner, in a populous city, drowning in society
  7. Rootkit on Demand by OmegaBlac · · Score: 1, Troll
    In addition, Sony said it has the capability to upgrade the PS3's OS after the console launches through its online network, memory stick files or Blu-ray discs.
    Let us hope that the only stuff that Sony will attempt to "upgrade" is additional game content, bug fixes, online store, and other similiar positive features. No rootkits on my PS3, Sony! ;)
  8. What do people expect? by DrXym · · Score: 2
    Sony have very successfully introduced firmware enhancements to the PSP, so what's the big story here? Of course the firmware at TGS was unlikely to be the final version because there is no final version. There is nothing to stop Sony from supplying a firmware update on the game discs or when you log on to the net. Either way, the firmware gets enhanced over time to fix bugs, plug any security holes and add new functionality.

    It would be stupid if the PS3 didn't do it. Not only would it mean you'd be stuck with bugs forever, but you never get new features. The PSP got some substantial new functionality such as web browser, AAC playback, location free etc. through firmware. I'd be pissed if a console in this day and age *didn't* offer it.

    1. Re:What do people expect? by cowscows · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't think people are upset at the possibility of new features, it's just that there's a flipside to this coin, and it's that the ability to patch problems through updates makes it "acceptable" for devs/publishers to ship games that might not quite be up to the quality we're used to on consoles, at least in terms of bugs and such. When you know you won't be able to patch your software, and your company's reputation is on the line, there's good reason to test the hell out of your game. Now the "ship now, fix it later" mentality that plagues PC games might make the jump to our living rooms.

      Maybe 10 years ago, I could play Nintendo for six hours a day, for twelve months straight, and I'd see less crashes than I would in a week of light computer use. That is one of the biggest reasons why console gaming has grown so much bigger than PC gaming. Now that Microsoft has finally gotten a handle on their OS stability, it's depressing to think that console gaming might be going in the other direction.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  9. Games going gold with non-final OS and hardware by DrDitto · · Score: 1

    I know that many game studios have already shipped their final codebase that is untested on final hardware and software. Trust me, they are crossing their fingers that everything works.

  10. REASONS for buying a PS3 early by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. Costs more.
    2. Get to find all the bugs it shipped with
    3. Controller may or may not respond the way you expect
    4. Game manual may not accurately tell you how to do something, since the OS wasn't final.

    but, most importantly

    5. PROFIT! (for Sony)

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  11. Neither was... by DarthMojo · · Score: 0

    Microsofts..but they still released it!

  12. Sigh by TB · · Score: 0

    Sony mentioned a long time ago the OS was able to be updated, along with its software to add new features.

  13. remember those PSPs??? by bhalter80 · · Score: 1

    Lets not forget about Sony's history with firmware upgrades especially as they relate to gaming hardware. When the PSP came out and I started reading about all the homebrew software for it I was really enthused and wanted one but those days quickly came to an end as Sony deployed new "features" in firmware upgrades and while they have delivered new software to users they also have locked down the device far beyond where it was when it was purchased in many user's cases.

    For me the lesson is be ware of Sony products promising upgradable software as a venue for delivering more features.

    1. Re:remember those PSPs??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I remember them, I bought a PSP early on, well the games sucked and the lack luster support for media due to a rubbish BIOS made me sell it. Now the BIOS's are pretty good and offer features that I might use. So the lesson is that Sony will beta test on the suckers that buy there products early on, so wait until their BIOS meets their marketting hype and then buy a PS3 then, not before

  14. Updates by drwav · · Score: 1

    That is corporate speek for playing the arms race between DRM and DRM crackers.

  15. Software IS easy by germansausage · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sure it is - just ask any marketing guy.

    All you gotta do is write some code.

  16. just what im looking forward to.... by grapeape · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone else as excited as I am of having consoles that will likely require patches. Sounds to me that the "upgradability" discussed is just a big opening for same sorts of problems that affect pc games. I guess the good news is that horrible bugs can be patched.

    I predict that symantec will magically find the first ps3 and wii viruses about a week after launch..if not before. Luckily with the online stores for all 3 vendors we can buy and download our "virus protection" for a small fee from the convenience of our gamepads.

  17. Obligatory Nintendo Fanboy Reaction by aztektum · · Score: 0, Troll

    D00dz! th4t$ s0 t3h SuXx0rz. t3h s0ny is just ripping off Nintendo now... (sorry got too lazy to keep w/ the 1337 speak)

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  18. Good news to me. by dannycim · · Score: 2, Informative

    I expect the upgrades are going to work just like those on PSP. Select the Update option on the crossbar, hit OK, wait for download to finish, click OK, machine reboots, and you're done. Very simple, very monolithic so even your grandmother can deal with it. No questions about drivers or libraries, it just works.

    As far as the games coming out while the OS isn't set in stone, don't worry. Typically games come with all the software they need to drive the hardware directly, so they interact with the OS firmware very little. On PS3, I think they'll just plug-in into the firmware API through standardized calls for networking stuff, like chatting and other online services.

  19. In other news... by MaestroSartori · · Score: 1

    ...Xbox 360 OS *still* not finished after product release! Wii OS to be released unfinished also! Linux, Windows totally not finished either! ZOMGWTF!11!1

    Imagine the sheer balls on Sony (my employer, disclamer etc.) releasing unfinished software to the masses! How evil of them! I'm astounded, gutted, horrified, etc.

    Keep FUDing boys, it entertains us semi-rational folks :)

  20. Bigger worries ahead by Fireball+Five · · Score: 1

    Meh, the OS being updated via online updates I can live with. What is really scary are the anecdotal reports that Blu-Ray discs are incredibly fragile. Seems there are two issues, one is that the data is stored very close to the surface of the disc, the other is that the laser has to be held very close to the disc as well. So far all the Blu-Ray owners are the technophiles who by nature treat even the discs with kid gloves, and even some of them have reported that a stray hair or fingerprint leads to a read error. With the data held so close to the surface of the disc, the real worry is scratching. Fingerprints can be wiped off (but imagine a read error 5 hours into a game without a recent save), but a slight scratch could mean death. I'm wondering if all the PS3 errors and restarts at the recent show were more to do with the discs being either dirty or scratched and producing read errors. If that is the case, if Blu-Ray discs are as fragile as some are reporting it to be, then the console has the potential to be the biggest tech disaster of the last decade. Once kids get their hands on games and start being casual with the disc handling then we'll soon hear about if it is true or not.

  21. Expectations and software by just+fiddling+around · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This comment shows the source of the patch situation: damn programmers are too lazy to do engineering right!

    Do you thing hardware is easy?? It ain't, and it's tougher than software by miles. Why is it that hardware has to be perfect at all price points and "low cost" software has no such duty? I'll give you the answer: programmers are lazy. Programmers have been lazy for so long that even users have no expectation of quality for software. And software publishers have been so good at backing lazy programmers that putting a disclaimer inside the software, unaccessible before purchase and binding before it can be read, is a legally accepted way to do business.

    I've done hardware, and am now in software. Still, I think that somebody should sue the pants off a sloppy software publisher just like the dumbass that sued Lawn-Boy for cutting off his own limb while using a lawnmower to do his hedge-trimming. Maybe sloppy asses would wake up and stop playing with computers and start engineering products instead.

    I'll leave you with a question to answer: what is the lowest price, for a piece of software, at which it should behave as expected and be free of faults? 100$, 1 k$, 100k$?

    --
    You're not old until regret takes the place of your dreams.
    1. Re:Expectations and software by oc255 · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. And I just lost all motivation to keep reading my obj-c book. Which I suppose, supports your point again.

  22. xbox360's OS? by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

    just like the Wii's OS, it will be upgradeable in the future.

    Is that to imply that the 360's OS is not upgradable? I own a 360, and knew there were... updates to be had; game updates, Dashboard updates, so i then assumed that the OS was as well. Is that not true?

  23. Wasn't Sony's Excuse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't Sony blame Blu-ray for the delay of the PS3's launch? If so, shouldn't the OS have been finished before Spring of this year? Wouldn't they have had everything game related- including online- figured out and functional? All this "extra" time should have just been polishing, right? So far no online games have been shown working (only LAN play on Resistance) and we know Tony Hawk isn't even attempting online play. Mmmmmm. Could it be that Sony was LYING again? Seriously, has ANYTHING Sony said or promised concerning the PS3 turned out to be true? Do any of you Sony fanboys think you are going to get 100% backwards compatability and quality Blu-ray (or is it Blew-ray or even Blu-rry) playback? Do you also wait outside each Halloween for the Great Pumpkin to show up?

  24. Gotta love it by androvsky · · Score: 1

    Same story, os on new consoles upgradeable. Shock (that's sarcasm in case you don't own an Xbox 1 or 360). Nintendo Wii: It runs linux (according to submitter, it won't)! You can upgrade it to reach the apex of civilization! It's brilliant and never thought of before! Sony PS3: Look at what a piece of crap it is! Constantly fixing bugs! Sony just wants force the DRM on us! The anti-Sony bias has traveled beyond obvious, turned the corner at hilarious, and is now getting on the on-ramp to conspiracy theory land. With Microsoft people trying to sell the Nintendo Wii, I don't have to tell you where the next exit is.

  25. You just kicked me out of my ranting mood. Thanks!

    --
    You're not old until regret takes the place of your dreams.