Slashdot Mirror


uTube.com Business Stalled by YouTube Purchase Hype

prostoalex writes "Google's acquisition of online video sharing site YouTube.com resulted in massive traffic headed to uTube.com, "the number one supplier of used Tube & Pipe equipment in the world!", according to the site. CNN Money reports: "The company, which sells used machinery for making tubes to clients worldwide, has seen its site utube.com knocked off line by millions of online searchers looking for video site. "It's killing us," said Ralph Girkins, president and owner of the 22-year-old business. "All my worldwide reps use our Web site. Customers all over the world use it to bring up photos of the machinery, descriptions and specifications there."""

51 of 202 comments (clear)

  1. Insult to injury by cbcanb · · Score: 5, Funny

    On top of that, now Slashdot links to it...

    1. Re:Insult to injury by ztransform · · Score: 5, Funny

      If all slashdot readers can AVOID the temptation to visit the utube site I'm sure the company would much appreciate it!

    2. Re:Insult to injury by Ghost+Hedgehog · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think the company will be quite happy when all the readers at least buy something

    3. Re:Insult to injury by MMC+Monster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Umm... As a /. user, what exactly am I supposed to buy from utube.com? Extra pipes to get more internet?

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    4. Re:Insult to injury by Jimmy+King · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'll need one hell of a truck to ship those tubes.

    5. Re:Insult to injury by kabocox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If all slashdot readers can AVOID the temptation to visit the utube site I'm sure the company would much appreciate it!

      Opps. Why the heck did they post links in the summary if they didn't want us to visit it?

      It sounds like the company should update their webhosting and look at all the miss directed youtube folks as free ads. Well, I can see where the company is coming from. My dad sells large farm equipment. Their company would never ever just stick an ad in newspaper or do TV ads. They put ads only in industry specific mags. If you are looking for peices of machinary around $50-60K each you will see their products when shopping around in that industry. They wouldn't want John Doe Average Walmart Shopper to even look or visit their site as that person isn't likely to ever buy any of their products. Now if John Doe Average was actually looking for their products it would be different. It would be like say car companies with cars costing over $200K paying walmart to post ads at their entrance. It just wouldn't happen. Not enough walmart shoppers would even be the right demographic for that product. Of course, you do have doctors and lawyers that shop at walmart too so maybe it would be worth their effort.

    6. Re:Insult to injury by AlexDV · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ahem, I think you mean tubes. And, yes, given that the Internet is a series of tubes, it stands to reason that buying more tubes would allow you to get your Internets faster. After all, it's not just a truck that you can dump stuff on. Good grief, everyone knows that, you loser.

    7. Re:Insult to injury by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Funny
      As a /. user, what exactly am I supposed to buy from utube.com?

      2.5 inch PVC happens to be very close to the size of a tennis ball.

      Not that anyone would ever special order 2.5" PVC for use in a pneumatic air cannon.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    8. Re:Insult to injury by idonthack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Coincedentally, they also work very well for meat storage.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    9. Re:Insult to injury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      OK, I give up, how do you use pneumatic air cannons for meat storage?

  2. and now we /. them by notanatheist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good job y'all. They're already complaining about traffic and you link to their site?!

    1. Re:and now we /. them by tttonyyy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Worth noting that the professionally edited article at CNN links to everyone concerned except utube.com. At least they engage their brains before publishing stories.

      --
      biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    2. Re:and now we /. them by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...professionally edited article at CNN...[snip]...At least they engage their brains

      Two firsts in the one day!

      (Someone had to say it. But I agree they made the correct decision)

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  3. And as if that wasn't enough.. by arun_s · · Score: 4, Funny

    they're now at /.
    Poor guys.

    --
    I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
  4. Tubes by Grr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well luckily he has enough tubes for all those internets!

  5. Oh, come off it. by Kris_J · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Take the link out of the story, seriously.

    1. Re:Oh, come off it. by SetupWeasel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seconded. Why is that modded funny?

    2. Re:Oh, come off it. by joekampf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about the sites that have been truley "slashdotted"? Meaning they actually had problems because of the unexpected overload of traffic caused by a slash dot link? You didn't review those. So I guess your whole post was pointless. Come on, remove the damn link! Every hit counts! Joe

      --
      When a man lies he murders a part of the world.
  6. Next aquisition by kjart · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously, utube.com will be Google's next aquisition - just look at how much traffic they get!

    1. Re:Next aquisition by aussie_a · · Score: 5, Funny

      They don't, I checked. Several times.

  7. Put up some advertising/adsense banners by future+assassin · · Score: 5, Funny

    While you can. Might as well score some cash from the traffic.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  8. Oh, boo hoo by catbutt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If they can't figure out a way to profit from this, too freakin bad for them.

    1. Re:Oh, boo hoo by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Plus, how could they not see this coming?

      DilPerson: "Gee, Boss, we're an obscure vendor of plumbing piping with the same name phonetically as the devastatingly popular video site. One of these days we're gonna get slammed. Can I have $1000 to set up a couple backup servers?"

      Pointy: "Nah. They're looking for videos, not plumbing, right?"

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    2. Re:Oh, boo hoo by leonardluen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      according to whois utube.com has been registered since 1996
      youtube.com has been registered since 2005

      i think when they first made their website that was the last thing they were thinking about.

  9. Are they confused as Ted Stevens? by NZheretic · · Score: 2, Funny
  10. It's 2006 by Centurix · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's the year of the tube

    --
    Task Mangler
  11. Deja Vu by tttonyyy · · Score: 4, Funny

    And how kind of the slashdot editors to link to utube directly, just to rub the slashdot salt into the wounds.

    (I can hear their servers weeping in the corner right now).

    --
    biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    1. Re:Deja Vu by Gulik · · Score: 2, Funny

      (I can hear their servers weeping in the corner right now).

      Oh, they're not weeping -- that sound you hear is the server's molten case dripping out of the rack.

  12. Solution by Arwing · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, MLB.com had this problem a few years ago when it was owned by some law firm. Their solution is simple, have a really simple front page saying "If you are looking for the video site YOUtube, click on the link,
    if you are looking for used hardware, click on Utube

    It will save them some trouble in the short run, but my question is shouldn't this be happening all along since youtube is popular BEFORE google decided to buy it out?

    1. Re:Solution by Peeteriz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The issue is that if the site gets promoted electronically, then the name/link tends to be correct.
      But, if the issue is promoted on TV (like it was with the google buyout), then people just hear the name "youtoob" and with the trend of naming things iThis, eThat, it's quite likely that these people think that it should be written uTube.
      Noone is going to make the mistake if they get the recommendation in writing - via e-mail, IM, etc - then YouTube can't be confused with uTube - but they do sound the same.

    2. Re:Solution by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't drool on my shirt all day either.

      You would though if you owned a shirt.

  13. Nothing to see here, it's up by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Their site is fine now. Their equipment, though...

    They're a surplus machinery dealer, and much of their equipment has seen hard use followed by neglect. The neglect is worse than the hard use. This lathe is a good example. That's a good Monarch precision lathe, but the picture, taken in 2000, shows considerable rust. Most of their gear is like that; it looks like it came out of an abandoned factory. It's repairable; you can send the lathe back to Monarch for an overhaul. But it's not good for much in its current condition. If there's any rust in the bearings, the precision is lost.

    For comparison, see this Monarch Lathe on eBay. Made in 1950, and still in good shape. Those things will last a century if cared for.

    If you have machinery like that around that's not in use, you have to oil it, then wrap it in plastic with some dessicant inside.

    1. Re:Nothing to see here, it's up by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And how the fuck is this modded +5 interesting?
      It is far more interesting, in a relative sense, than the three hundred posts of "haw haw, now utube.com is linked by slashdot and they will get teh slashdoted" that comprise most of the rest of the discussion.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  14. Spelling is HARD by CBWest76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The most frightening aspect of this is that there are tens of millions of people out there that are having a difficult time spelling out YouTube. If it were a case of mistyping, would that particular iteration really show up that much? Perhaps we have millions of kids out there who genuinely believe that you is spelled u.

    1. Re:Spelling is HARD by hyfe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Can you tell the difference between uTube and YouTube when pronounced? No?

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    2. Re:Spelling is HARD by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suppose you laugh at people who think eyeTunes is spelt iTunes, right? They must be illiterate as well, right? Perhaps they really do think the body part known as the eye is spelt i.

    3. Re:Spelling is HARD by Atario · · Score: 2, Funny
      Perhaps we have millions of kids out there who genuinely believe that you is spelled u.
      Could be worse -- we could be reading a story right now about how some site called uT00b.com is getting swamped.
      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    4. Re:Spelling is HARD by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you go shopping on EBB-eh for used IP-odds? Does it confuse you when Emile sends you email?

      Single-letter prefixes and intentional bizarre "mispellings" are par for the course on the Internet. There's no good way for anyone not already familiar with YouTube to umabiguously know whether it was "utube" or "youtube" if they just heard the name.

    5. Re:Spelling is HARD by complete+loony · · Score: 3, Funny

      Crap, you just took out my server.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  15. Lesson in domain names for YouTube by antic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wherever possible, pick a name that is easily read in an email or understood when read out over radio, on the phone, or in conversation. Also, easy to remember and spell.

    But almost $2b later, I can't imagine that the founders care all that much!

    --
    'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
  16. Ancient Slashdot Joke Retread by lxdbxr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Suggestion to CEO of uTube:
    1. Register utube.biz or similar alternative name; make utube.com a lightweight page redirecting actual customers to the .biz site
    2. Start selling ad space on the rest of the utube.com pages
    3. Profit!
    --
    -- Nothing unusual happened today
  17. there's a reason I don't give slashdot my money! by Xtifr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, actually several, but mostly it boils down to the utter lack of editorial standards. Bad grammar, bad spelling, slashvertisements, links to semi-literate amateur blogs for stories carried by decent, high-quality sites, and ... sheer idiocy like this. I enjoy slashdot. It's an interesting diversion. And I've been around for a long time, and I still haven't given up on it. But the complete and utter lack of editorial common sense or professionalism is simpy infuriating at times! I would miss slashdot if it disappeared, but there's no way I'm willing to pay for something this poorly produced. And that's the bottom line.

    However, at least this time I can be proud to announce that I did not RTFA! :)

  18. That's not nice! by Bob+Gelumph · · Score: 4, Funny

    How could all those internet users knock the main company offline who was responsible for construction of the Internet?

    --
    I'm gonna need a spec.
  19. Sheesh.. by l0cust · · Score: 2, Funny

    Talk about common sense.

    Pope: "We have decided to ban certain type of statues inside Vatican City depicting erotic postures. Come here Father Bryan and Sister Camilla, and take of your clothes please. Ok this is pose 1..Bryan put your hand there.. this is pose 2... oh and..(takes off his clothes).. eh..yeah that seems right.. this is pose 3.

    A million slashdot editors gasp in shock and then erect similar statues all over the city to inform everyone what kind of statues are not allowed.

    --
    Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
  20. YAFIYGI by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "All my worldwide reps use our Web site. Customers all over the world use it to bring up photos of the machinery, descriptions and specifications there."

    I guess they found out the hard way that making normal business operation dependent on the availability of the website, without taking great pains to assure that availability, is asking for trouble.

    This time, they got slashdotted by mistake. Next time, it could be a targeted DDoS attack.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  21. Probably just a misguided marketing ploy anyway by tttonyyy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Utube marketing guy: WTF? Our server is down!
    Utube hosting provider: (putting down fire extinguisher) We want more money, you're burning bandwidth like the U.S. burns fossil fuels!
    Utube marketing guy: Wait - I've just hear that Google bought YouTube and people are interested. Hey! This is an amazing marketing opportunity, I wonder how we can make use of it? (Pays hosting provider big wodge of cash)

    (...ten minutes of googling later)

    Utube marketing guy: My highly expensive and accurate research shows that tubes are incredibly important to our new potential customer base at slashdot.org, they talk about them a lot.
    Utube CEO: OK, so how do we get their attention?
    Utube marketing guy: Simple, we whine to CNN about how our business is going down the toilet thanks to google, then submit a story to slashdot - they love that stuff!

    (...)

    Slashdot editor: Hmm, I've been rejecting a lot of stories like this recently, and this one appears to be suitably poorly put together - perfect!
    Slashdot editor: (skipping "Dupe Check"/"Spel Check"/"Grahma Check" buttons) *PUBLISH*
    Slashdot readers: Oooh, how cruel to link to that site! (Follows link to see if servers really are down or not).
    Server room: (indifferent rattle of hard disks)
    Utube hosting provider: (puffing on expensive cigar) Suckers! Time to order my new Humvee.

    --
    biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
  22. They've been trained by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Interesting

    think about it- "E"bay "E"trade they hear about utube on the radio business news or finance programs, (npr for example) and type that name in, best guess

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  23. Now the name makes sense by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now i know why they named their site YouTube instead of uTube. The second would be more appropriate given the audience, but was already taken.

  24. Free Advertising? by bad_fx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well shit, this seems like pretty good free advetising for these guys. I'd stop complaining if I were them...

  25. In other news... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Funny

    NotATruck.com has also experienced a major spike in traffic, due to confused congressmen.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  26. I don't hear sysco complaining (cisco?) by acomj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    2 companies, same pronounsiation.

    sysco - provider of food stuff to eateries
    http://www.sysco.com/
    cisco - provider of network equipment.