Slashdot Mirror


Human Species May Split In Two

gEvil (beta) writes "According to an article at the BBC, an evolutionary theorist in London suggests that humanity may split into two sub-species within the next 100,000 years. From the article: 'The descendants of the genetic upper class would be tall, slim, healthy, attractive, intelligent, and creative and a far cry from the "underclass" humans who would have evolved into dim-witted, ugly, squat goblin-like creatures.'" No missing link here, we already have the troll-like humans to prove it.

7 of 1,000 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Confounding factors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    fact that she is physically attractive
    *Snort!* Ha ha ha ha ha ha....... heeeee ha ha ha ha ha! *sniff*.......
  2. Re:So to be clear... by sgt_doom · · Score: 1, Troll

    I suspect this Curry clown is getting his "evolutionary theory" mixed up with reality. He's describing the Australians and the New Zealanders, with the Aussies being the Eloi and the NZers being the Morlocks.....

  3. Re:wait, that sounds familiar.. by Sathias · · Score: 0, Troll

    Mac users and PC users You work out which is which..

    Hmmm... let me see... is it something to do with how many mouse buttons they are capable of using at once?

    --
    Blessed are the 1337, for they shall pwn the earth.
  4. Re:So to be clear... by Sathias · · Score: 1, Troll

    Is it just me or does this sound suspiciously like what Hitler was trying to achieve with his master race?

    --
    Blessed are the 1337, for they shall pwn the earth.
  5. Re:Correction to Last Sentence by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1, Troll

    Riches and poverty are subjective.
    On of the richest men I never saw was the Amish fellow in Lancaster who refused to be cheapened by a CNN appearance--we got to hear his calm voice, while admiring his shins and shoes.
    No one exceeds on heartbeat from their demise. Pursue wisdom; let the loot fall where it may.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  6. Re:So to be clear... by NittanyTuring · · Score: 0, Troll
    Do you mean that rediculous movie where the guy travels eight hundred thousand years into the future, where that one lady spoke English: "Do you understand my words . . . ?", and that holographic librarian Orlando Jones was still there?
    No, we mean the book, not the horrible movie adaptation of the book. The book did not have these foolish things that you describe.
  7. Re:Confounding factors by roman_mir · · Score: 0, Troll

    The fact that she is physically attractive - which one of the pictures on that page is she?