Slashdot Mirror
Opera to Start Phoning Home?
An anonymous reader writes "Near the end of a story about Opera's determination to stay in the game: 'Earlier this week, Opera announced an addition that will keep it in step with its rivals. Johan Borg, a developer working on the browser, said Tuesday in a blog that the next edition, Opera 9.1, will include beefed up anti-phishing and anti-fraud features. Rather than simply indicate that a site is secure with a notation in the address bar, Opera 9.1 will also query Opera-owned servers for information on any site visited. Those that Opera has identifies as fraudulent will be automatically blocked by the browser.'"
Those that Opera has identifies as fraudulent will be automatically blocked by the browser.'"
Seems to recall this can lead Opera to trouble, like what happened with Spamhaus.
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
I relay like this idea, so long as it can be turned off. Based on my experiance with Opera so far I'd say that not only will it be able to be turned off, but that you can disable it on a server by server baises.
There's a reason I was willing to pay for Opera when it was still a commercial product. Now if only they would make a Symbian native version, the Java version has a hard time in landscape mode on my Nokia N93.
"Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
Well the fact that opera will check EVERY site someone goes to against their own server might work in theory...but does anyone really want all their web use data to be tracked by a server?
In a world of acronyms, the words are the real victims.
Your ISP can track everything you do. That must mean that they are abusing their position. Why get Opera to track your surfing when your ISP could do so much more efficiently?
Clever signature text goes here.
That's if they log the requests - given that they're a Norwegian company, they have some pretty tough privacy laws to content with.
I expect that it will depend on the terms and conditions in the end, and that they will say 'we will not log or use your data in a user-specific manner (not even AOL style 'user == number' obfuscation, hehe), however we may use it to compile statistics on accesses to phishing sites', which could prove quite useful in anti-phisher court trials.
It's no different to IE7 or the next version of Safari. The best way to check a website is authentic is to check the URL against a blacklist and then tell the user in big red text in a way they'd be retarded to ignore about the threat. I do think it would be better to download the blacklist to the client and resync it often however.
How do the Firefox add-ins, IE7 and Safari 3 handle anti-phishing?
Isn't this against everything we say when it comes to Microsoft? We're meant to be protecting Joe Six-Pack. Various features should ship with the default to 'on', so that those in the know are free to turn it off, but it still protects those who it would most likely benefit?
One problem with your argument:
Joe Sixpack will not use Opera; he'll use IE. That's why we harp on MS for being so lax in security. They're targeting the lowest common denominator.