Slashdot Mirror


Tainted "Piracy" Statistics

newtley writes, "The music, movie, and software cartels claim 'piracy' is a Number One problem not only for themselves, but for the world as a whole and so successful are their continuing dis- and misinformation propaganda campaigns that they've been able to dragoon entire governments and police forces into acting as industry enforcers. But, says p2pnet, far from being at the top of the pile, movie and music piracy rank 16th and 20th, respectively, on a global index of illicit markets. (Software piracy ranks 7th.) And even those positions are subject to considerable doubt."

56 of 401 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds like a great waste of time all around by dada21 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That list gives me even more reason to believe that society and the States that surround us are both inept. Look at the rundown of the top 10 items and the reasons why the item is "contraband."

    1. Marijuana -- The State says what you can put into your body (doing no crime to no one else), probably funded by the big medical business

    2. Counterfeit Technology Products -- This is why you shop at stores that guarantee their products with a refund. If there was no law against counterfeit goods, I'd let the retailer find out what is best for me. In some cases, something counterfeit might be of the same quality as the "official and legal" version. Look at Fendi handbags and their knock-offs

    3. Cocaine -- See #1. No crime committed against anyone else. Now if you kill someone (when on drugs or off), I can agree that a crime is committed, but the intoxicant shouldn't matter. Sometimes that intoxicant is adrenaline.

    4. Opion/Heroin -- See #1 (doing crime to no one else).

    5. Pirated Web Videos. Supply and demand here. The supply of digitally transmitted products is nearly infinite, therefore the price falls to the floor. Then again, I am I am against copyright.

    6. Counterfeit Pharmaceutical -- Here's another place that the retail and distributor can excel at. Don't trust your distributor? Shop at one that's insured and bonded against dispensing dangerous drugs, or knock-off ones.

    7. Pirated Software. See #5 (supply and demand).

    8. Human Trafficking. Here's a place I can understand goverment being involved in, but it is also one they're doing a terrible job in fighting. The worst concern is my thought that a lot of States might even be involved in this problem. I know the U.S. government trafficks in human lives and bodies. See Guantanemo Bay.

    9. Amphetamines/Meth -- See #1 (doing crime to no one else).

    10. Animals and Wildlife Smuggling. Here's a problem better solved through groups like PERC. If you care about rare animals, spend YOUR money to make wildlife habitats to keep them out of the open arms of the State that is part of the problem with extinction.

    11. Ecstasy -- See #1 (doing crime to no one else).

    12. Counterfeit Auto Parts -- See #2 (shop at trustworthy retailers if you're concerned).

    13. Trash Smuggling. A friend of mine is a famous pastor in Uganda. I told him we should go into business to take trash from the U.S. on boats to Uganda and let people find value in the trash. He loved the idea. He deals with the absolute poorest people in Africa every day (I'm going there again in December) and he loves the thought that one man's trash is another man's treasure. They'd probably find millions of dollars worth of treasure in our trash.

    14. Human Smuggling -- See #8 (State's failure).

    15. Art and Antique Smuggling. I insure against theft, so should you. The State is worthless here.

    16. Pirated Movies -- See #5 (supply and demand).

    17. Smuggled Cigarettes -- Thank the market for cheaper tax free smokes. I noticed they were $7 a pack in Chicago a few weeks ago. Tax free they're about 70 cents. The State created this problem.

    18. Gas and Oil Smuggling. See #17 on the State destroying the market of goods through taxation/theft.

    19. Pirated Music -- See #5 (supply and demand).

    20. Illegal Fishing -- See #10 (privately funded habitats).

    22. Pirated Mobile Phone Entertainment -- See #5 (supply and demand).

    23. Pirated Video Games -- See #5 (supply and demand).

    24. Counterfeit Cigarettes -- See #17 (market provisions) and #2 (shop at trustworthy retailers if you're concerned).

    25. Small Arms Trafficking -- See the second amendment.

    27. Counterfeit Shoes -- See #2 (shop at trustworthy retailers if you're concerned).

    28. Pirated Books -- See #5 (supply and demand).

    29. Counterfeit Sports Memorabilia -- See #5 (supply and demand) and #2 (shop

    1. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by gt_mattex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      19. Pirated Music -- See #5 (supply and demand).


      20. Illegal Fishing -- See #10 (privately funded habitats).

      I think that says it all. Pirated music is just a slightly bigger problem than illegal fishing.

      --
      "No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture." - Learned Hand
    2. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by GregVernon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just to be obnoxious, or maybe just to tell you something, the U.S. Constitution isn't amended with Copyright laws; or any other laws for that matter. Laws are put into service via the terms written into the constitution however the constitution isn't changed. One can add amendments by introducing it, then having a vote with all the states. If it passes by a 2/3's vote, it becomes an amendment.

    3. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Joebert · · Score: 5, Funny
      13. Trash Smuggling

      Somehow I figured raccoons were a bigger nuisance.
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    4. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by belmolis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I agree with many of these, there are a couple I have problems with. With regard to small arms trafficking, your comment suggests that it isn't a problem because people have a right to bear arms. First, that doesn't mean that everyone should be able to carry arms. Do you really object to restrictions on felons and mentally ill people obtaining firearms, restricting the ability of rogue governments and criminal organizations to obtain them? Second, "small arms" includes a lot of things other than hunting rifles and handguns suitable for self-defense. It includes everything short of mortars and howitzers. Do you really think that sales of AK-47s, Browning Automatic Rifles, flame throwers, and rocket propelled grenades should be unregulated?

      The other problem I see is with illegal fishing. Private habitat development may be a solution to the loss of habitat for some exotic animals and plants with limited ranges, but how is it going to stop overfishing for cod in the Atlantic, for example? I don't see how a private party can protect sufficient habitat for wide-ranging fish in international waters.

    5. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 4, Informative

      If my historical degree from the History channel means anything, those drugs (1,3,4,9,11) became illegal well before the Big Pharma of today. The 'channel also had an interesting contention that the pressure to make them illegal was born out a combination of racism, prohibition movements, and misinformation. Today, well maybe its Big Pharma keeping it going, but personally I think its politicians looking for an easy issue to agree with voters. Mind you, I mean both Liberals and Conservatives; I'll not have my opinion dumped on one group and not the other.

      That said, the constitution is an evolving document, subject to the collective will of the people, for better or worse, yadda yadda yadda.

      --
      Demented But Determined.
    6. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Heir+Of+The+Mess · · Score: 4, Informative

      As much as I hate to step on the toes on someone advocating civil liberties there is a thing I would like to argue with you about.

      You seem to be saying that all drugs are harmless. Tell this to any father whose daughter has been introduced to drugs like Cocaine at a party, gotten addicted, travelled down the path to where she has to do unspeakable things for money to buy more, and then eventually died from an overdose or suicide. I think you'll have an argument on your hands. I've seen this happen. It's horrid. You can't group all drugs in the same backet. Drug pushers destroy lives for their own profit, and they have some pretty devastating, instantly addictable weapons in their arsenal that they use to draw young people, particulary girls, into their net.

      I guess you could say that people should be allow to make the choice about whether to be enslaved by drugs, but often young people don't understand the nature of the enslavement until it's too late. Experience is often something you get after you needed it.

      --
      Australian running a company that does C# / C++ / Java / SQL / Python / Mathematica
    7. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Heir+Of+The+Mess · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You seem to be saying that all drugs are harmless. Tell this to any father whose daughter has been introduced to drugs like Cocaine at a party, gotten addicted, travelled down the path to where she has to do unspeakable things for money to buy more, and then eventually died from an overdose or suicide. I think you'll have an argument on your hands. I've seen this happen. It's horrid. You can't group all drugs in the same backet. Drug pushers destroy lives for their own profit, and they have some pretty devastating, instantly addictable weapons in their arsenal that they use to draw young people, particulary girls, into their net.

      I forgot to add the topic-relevent bit.

      Calling music piracy a major problem when society is full of stuff like quoted above is laughable.

      --
      Australian running a company that does C# / C++ / Java / SQL / Python / Mathematica
    8. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Meatloaf+Surprise · · Score: 2, Insightful
      3. Cocaine -- See #1. No crime committed against anyone else. Now if you kill someone (when on drugs or off), I can agree that a crime is committed, but the intoxicant shouldn't matter. Sometimes that intoxicant is adrenaline.
      4. Opion/Heroin -- See #1 (doing crime to no one else).

      How about we legalize all weapons while we're at it (rocket launchers, AK-47s, etc)? Certainly if I wanted to harm someone I'd find a way to do it anyway, right? Your logic is flawed because cocaine/opion(did you mean opium?)/heroin would become HUGE problems in society and I don't need to explain this if you have any practical sense whatsoever.

      2. Counterfeit Technology Products -- This is why you shop at stores that guarantee their products with a refund. If there was no law against counterfeit goods, I'd let the retailer find out what is best for me. In some cases, something counterfeit might be of the same quality as the "official and legal" version. Look at Fendi handbags and their knock-offs
      6. Counterfeit Pharmaceutical -- Here's another place that the retail and distributor can excel at. Don't trust your distributor? Shop at one that's insured and bonded against dispensing dangerous drugs, or knock-off ones.
      7. Pirated Software. See #5 (supply and demand).

      It's not a matter of trusting the distributor or not, its a matter of covering the costs of development. Who will want to spend the money to develope a new product if a knockoff company can come along, copy it exactly, and sell it for much less? The knockoff company has barely any development costs compared to the company that originally created it and can sell it for much less.
      And pirated software? Give me a break. How the hell will any software company survive if pirating the software is legal? (Donations?)
    9. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Chimera512 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Equating Heroin and Marijuana?!? Are you serious? Heroin has claimed (tens? hundreds? of) thousands and thousands of lives from overdoses, AIDS, gang related violence, suicides and other terrible things I cannot imagine. My uncle, a friend and a girl from my high school (who had been a graduate for about a month) have all died in connection to Heroin.

      I can't imagine I could find information more than a dozen marijuana related fatalities, if that many. I don't know of any first hand.

    10. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Cadallin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Meth is only a problem because safer things are illegal and harder to get. Cocaine/LSD/Psilocybin (The list is due to the many effects of ampetamines which range from straight stimulant to psychodelic)are adequate replacements that are perfectly safe assuming a safe supply (that is, created in an actual chemical lab/plant, not a toilet bowl, as meth often is). Heroin is only dangerous to use because it is cut with quinine, which causes death by pulmonary effusion in overdose, and because needle sharing spreads HIV, another phenomena that wouldn't occur with legal availability.. And has anybody EVER adequately justified why marijuana use should be illegal? Because people get high and drive? I'll acknowledge that its dangerous and a bad idea to do so, but alcohol is a much worse problem, and Driving under the Influence of any pyschoative drug known to cause accidents should be illegal. Prohibition does not work! Drug Addiction (which is different from drug use) is a Medical problem, and should be treated as such!

    11. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Amouth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just wanted to note that you mentioned the right to bear arms.. that isn't meant to be there for self defense.. it is to be there so that the people will have the means if necessary to retaliate against their own government..

      now last time I checked our armed forces have every weapon known to man and many trained people to use them..

      if there was a civilian revolt today against the US it would require someone from the armed forces to command their troops against the government for it to work.. there is no way that the population could do it..

      by limiting their rights they also slowly erode the ability to use the second amendment to stop the government.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    12. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First... I mostly agree with you...
      That being said.
      1. Marijuana -- The State says what you can put into your body (doing no crime to no one else), probably funded by the big medical business
      No problem- hard to sneak to people and if you do, there is no immediate addiction.

      3. Cocaine -- See #1. No crime committed against anyone else. Now if you kill someone (when on drugs or off), I can agree that a crime is committed, but the intoxicant shouldn't matter. Sometimes that intoxicant is adrenaline.
      Used to addict prostitutes by pimps. While ordinary cocaine is only about as addictive as alchohol, the crack form *horrifically* addictive. It's very easy to sneak into people.

      4. Opion/Heroin -- See #1 (doing crime to no one else).
      Very addictive. Easy to sneak into people.

      My issue is with substances that may be added to my food, or to the smoky air or to cigarettes or pot that make them much more addictive.
      If it's not addictive and easy to sneak to others, then the government shouldn't be wasting its time.

      We have destroyed mexico, central, and south america with the war on drugs. If coke and pot were legal this wouldn't have happened. If coke and pot were legal, people would actually believe the harder drugs were dangerous. However- heroin *really* works for people in massive pain. It has value and shouldn't be thrown aside so cavalierly.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    13. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      what a horrific statement.

      You can't climb mountains- don't you realize hurting yourself hurts others!
      You can't enter contests- don't you realize hurting yourself hurts others!
      You can't eat fatty foods- don't you realize hurting yourself hurts others!
      You can't smoke- don't you realize hurting yourself hurts others!
      You can't do cocaine- don't you realize hurting yourself hurts others!
      You can't go on 2 hours sleep for a week- don't you realize hurting yourself hurts others!
      You can't not brush your teeth- don't you realize hurting yourself hurts others!

      Just because you *want* to pay for some kind of care for me, you get to take away every bit of freedom I have one action at a time.

      No thanks- let me die free.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    14. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by JoGlo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Free market anarchy is fine, and i do tend to agree with a lot of what you say, but i have a couple of worries.

      1 - The Second Amendment is a national legal instrument that plays no part in life outside of your borders. Many countries, for their own 9often valid) reasons, have chosen to either regulate or ban firearms, and your Second Amendment has nothing to do with their approach on the law. For those countries, firearm trafficking is a big problem - even if it isn't for you.

      2 - The abrogation of all copyright laws is well and good for users of the intellectual property who believe that it's a good idea not to pay for anything that they can get away with. Just a few problems with that approach:

      2.1 - The smaller the (paying) market, the larger the payment necessary to recompense for the cost of development, whether it's software, music, video or any other work of intennectual endeavour. Now, I know that many develop for the love of it, but for many others, this is their work, and the source of their livelihood. Will you, for the free property, pay to fead, heat and clothe the people who will from now on provide your entertainment but who now have no income? Get another job, you say! OK, so who now is making your software, your videos, your music? Because in the end, it's about money, and it has to be sourced from somewhere.

      2.2 - It's all about free choice. You (and I) are free to pay or not to pay for someone else's intellectual capital, and if that someone else is willing to give it away for free, then well done, that fellow, thanks a lot, and all that. But if someone says "No, I want to sell this instead of give it away", then that is his or her right to do so, and taking it without payment is no less theft than stealing someone's car, or burgling someone's house. You may not like it, but the first time you have a home that you own taken over by squatters, you'll see the other side of this particular problem. In the mean time, believe me when I say that copyright, however poorly it currently serves us, is better than the alternative.

      Cigarettes? Don't care!

      Alcohol? Don't care

      Fish poaching? DO care. The Japanese have just been caught out overfishing Blue Fin Tuna for the past 20 years or so, to the tune of many billions of dollars of this limited food stock. It's taken this long for the world to catch up with them, and they've just about fished out Blue Fin Tuna now. They are trying to do the same to the Whales, in the name of "scientific research", and if a large number of national governments can't satop them, what chance do you think that Green Peace or their ilk has?

      --
      Will those of you who think that you know what you are doing, get out of the way of those of us who know what we are doi
    15. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by zcat_NZ · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pirated Music ranks about three items below Trash Smuggling?

      Funny, I thought they were one and the same thing.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    16. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not that drugs don't have inherent risks, it's more that criminalizing them does nothing to prevent addiction. When drugs were first criminalized, it was because a whopping 7% of the population was estimated to be addicted to drugs. Now, close to a hundred years later, after many billions of dollars have been spent, and organized crime (gangs, mafia, etc) have been given control over these insanely profitable items leading to gang violence, filling and overfilling our prisons, underprivileged sectors of society have been demonized, etc etc etc... we have finally brought our national drug addiction rate down to... 7% of the population. That's why the drug war is not morally justified... if the resources funneled into fighting drugs with the police force had been channeled into public education, treatment and rehabilitation, and most of all improving the quality of life of citizens at risk for developing addictions (Read about rat park) there might have been a significant decrease in addiction rates, but the current policing model does NOTHING to prevent addiction.

    17. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by SpecBear · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't have to assume that all drugs are harmless in order to support their legalization. All that's required is that the harm done by prohibition is greater than the harm done by legalization. I've lived in neighborhoods that saw lots of drug traffic. If I had to choose between the current state of things and legalizing drugs (cocaine, speed, heroin, all of em) I'd choose legalization.

    18. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by shawb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And all of those issues would basically disappear if drugs were decriminalized. The only thing that would NOT change is the rate of addiction.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    19. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by wall0159 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow. That is, at the same time, both ignorant and stupid. Well done!

      1. You implicitly assume that addiction is related to genetics, and therefore by letting addicts die you are improving the gene-pool. Please provide some evidence of this.

      2. You confuse stupidity with ignorance

      3. You ignore a plethora of social factors involved in drug use

      4. You ignore the negative effects that drug users have on society

      5. You ignore the negative effects that the drug barons have on society (organised crime of other kinds).

      The idea that 'people should be allowed to do what they want with their own body' is wrong. It's wrong because it's based on the premise that we don't owe anything to society. No matter how independant you might think you are, you still owe a huge debt to society, and its ancestry. Just going with the flow isn't good enough, and we have a responsibility to each other to ensure that people pull their weight.

      That's one reason why I think 'libertarians' are wrong - they think all this is optional.

    20. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by PachmanP · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Your logic is flawed because cocaine/opion(did you mean opium?)/heroin would become HUGE problems in society and I don't need to explain this if you have any practical sense whatsoever.
      Humor us. What pray tell would the huge problems become? While I won't argue that with a little thought I couldn't think of a few problems, but the whole "I don't need to explain this..." argument doesn't wash. It certainly has no place in an intelligent discussion, and while I will admit that this is /. imagine how much better the discussions would be if people at least pretended it was an intelligent discourse.
      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    21. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it is to be there so that the people will have the means if necessary to retaliate against their own government..

            Which begs the question (as an outsider looking at what has happened in the US in the past few years) - so, what are you waiting for?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    22. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tell this to any father whose daughter has been introduced to drugs like Cocaine at a party, gotten addicted, travelled down the path to where she has to do unspeakable things for money to buy more, and then eventually died from an overdose or suicide.

      Hehe, you're making his argument for him. Cocaine is only expensive and hazardous because it's illegal. Make it legal and regulate it like booze, and it's going to be as cheap as somewhat expensive booze and come in a predictable concentration. Also, keep in mind that most cocaine users are casual - they do it for fun, then get on with their lives.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    23. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Funny

      illegal fishing is a far, far greater problem than music downloads,

            It certainly is, at least for the fish.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    24. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Sloppy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You shouldn't be asking "why is dope illegal". You should be asking "why isn't 60 minutes of cardio 4 times per week mandatory".
      It shouldn't be mandatory, because..
      When you do anything that harms yourself, you are, in effect, stealing from the State.
      ..not accruing tax isn't theft. Nobody owes jack shit to the state. It exists for our sake, not the other way around.
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    25. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you really object to restrictions on [...] mentally ill people obtaining firearms [...]?

      Wow, that question sends a chill down my spine. Who defines who is sufficiently 'mentally ill' to warrant restrictions? Would this category include those Stalin deemed to be mentally ill due to their opposition to his politics? What about homosexual people 50 years ago?

      If you open the door to arbitrary restictions on liberties, things becomes very cloudy when you need to decide where to close it. I agree that keeping firearms out of the hands of dangerous psychotic individuals is desireable, but I have no idea how that could be implemented fairly and without the potential for abuse.

      --
      Stasis is death. Embrace change.
    26. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      formal method by which the population can rise up and overthrow the government (bloodlessly) on a regular basis.

            Oh you bought into that lie did you? Politicians serve themselves first, the party second, and the people, oh well, we just didn't have the budget for it this year, but I promise that if you vote for me for another term, we'll...

            The parties are bought and sold. Vote for whoever you want. Your one studied and well intentioned vote will be lost in a sea of votes based on hairstyle, looks, sound-bytes and propaganda. And kid yourself into thinking that you made a difference.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    27. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You are right. However, if you do something to harm yourself, then at some point, the State has to care for you. Are you on welfare because of your cocaine habit? Then you are stealing. Are you in the hospital because you had an opium overdose? Then you are stealing. Did you get into a car accident because you were reaching for some fries? Then you are stealing. Did you go to prison because you shot someone in a drug-deal-gone-bad? Then you are stealing? There are many social and private services supporting our way of life. We have to work to pay for those services. When I work and pay tax to support your final months of lung cancer, then you have taken something from me.
      That's a pretty ridiculous stretch of the concept of "theft". By your own lame definition, senior citizens who were too dumb to save for their retirement because they didn't realize that the intended purpose of Social Security was to help those who'd lost their retirement savings due to financial disaster (Great Depression, Enron, S&L failure, etc), well, they're just as guilty of "stealing" as the junkie who gets a ride to the county hospital when he OD's. Calling it "stealing" is a laughably amateurish way of trying to absolve our government (and by extension, us) of our ignorance of the Laws of Unintended Consequences. If you want cokeheads out of the welfare rolls, well then get the eligibility rules changed. Quit vilifying the little guy for legitimately standing on the sidewalk with a basket when politicians are stupid enough (or smart enough!) to stand on the rooftops pouring down buckets of money. You need to stop masturbating over idiotic misapplications of the term "stealing" and accept that the real villain here is a giant monolithic government that has convinced people that it should take care of all our problems (in exchange for a little more taxation).
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    28. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by MrHanky · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Then again, overfishing is one of the biggest environmental and political problems we have on this planet. There just isn't any effective legislation for international waters and disputed areas on the borders. Maybe music piracy is a bigger "economic problem" than illegal fishing, but that's just because the cost of music files and CDs are grossly inflated. When it comes to fish, the resources are limited and shrinking, but there seems no lack of kids growing up wanting to be pop stars because of music piracy.

    29. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by arevos · · Score: 3, Insightful
      5. You ignore the negative effects that the drug barons have on society (organised crime of other kinds).

      Wait, surely this is an argument for legalising drugs? Criminals can profit from drug trafficking because its illicit nature allows them to have extremely high margins with none of the governmental oversight usually associated with the pharmaceutical business. If one could buy heroin or cocaine from the local chemist, organised crime gangs would be quickly priced out of the market by large pharma corporations. Doubtless there'd still be some money to be made from tax-dodging, but this would be a fraction of the market.

      So the question is whether you believe that the disadvantages of legalising drug use outweighs the advantages of significantly reducing the profits of organised crime.

      The idea that 'people should be allowed to do what they want with their own body' is wrong. It's wrong because it's based on the premise that we don't owe anything to society. No matter how independant you might think you are, you still owe a huge debt to society, and its ancestry.

      By that argument, suicide should be made illegal, since you're depriving society of your future contributions. Besides, paying back debts to society is exactly what taxes are for. If drug use increases our debt, then we should pay increased taxes; the high tax on cigarettes and alcohol is an obvious precedent.

      Arguing that we shouldn't be able to do what we want with our own bodies, implies that our bodies are not entirely our property. I'm not sure I particularly like the idea of this.

    30. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by joshetc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its horrid to punish someone for something they didn't do though. If I smoke myself into an oblivion then beat my wife, sure I should be punished. If I turn my baby into a crackhead to help it sleep at night, I should be punished. If I'm getting doped up all the time to the point that I can't support my family my children should be taken away by reason of neglect and I should be punished. If I like to smoke pot after work to calm myself down while I watch TV and munch on a bag of chips the government should fuck off.

    31. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by jkonrad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention, with more spent on education (and less on propaganda) perhaps the daughter would've been "introduced" to cocaine and it's dangers BEFORE the party.

      Furthermore, tell THIS to the father: next time you have a daughter, you might want to DO YOUR JOB AS A PARENT and educate your daughter about drugs (and other things she might encounter) BEFORE LETTING HER GO TO PARTIES.

      Sheesh.

    32. Re:Sounds like a great waste of time all around by phorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1. You implicitly assume that addiction is related to genetics, and therefore by letting addicts die you are improving the gene-pool. Please provide some evidence of this.

      Maybe not genetics, but possibly child-rearing. Part of the problem is that drunks, drug addicts, and others can (and often do) have children. The extremely volitile environment is often very damaging to the children, and causes them to grow into damaged adults. The cycle continues.

      This isn't always the case, but it tends to be quite prevalent in households with major abuse issues. I would hazard to say that if mom/dad spend 90% of their time with a needle in their veins, chances are that the child's chances of coming out good are going to be a lot more dependant on external factors. Heartless to say it, but if mom and dad took a little much one day and permanently flew off on iced wings, the kids might in the long term be better off.

      2. You confuse stupidity with ignorance

      The two often go hand-in-hand. Stupidity tends to related to lacking the ability to absorb or put to use knowledge. Ignorance is lack of knowledge, which may be due to stupidity (aka inability to absorb the knowledge at hand).

      4. You ignore the negative effects that drug users have on society

      People have to save themselves. Trust me, tons of money is spend on things such as "safe injection sites" and many others... which are a attempt to contain the problem or related problems (disease spread) rather than any effort to eliminate it.


      I'm of two sides on the issue. Drugs in terms of dealing etc should be dealt with as much as possible to the extent that the regulation of such doesn't cause more negetive impact on the lives of citizens than the dealing itself. However, allowing the "war on drugs" to be used as an excuse for abuses of power (although now the "war on terror" is more prevalent), wasting money busting a few kids who smoke pot (not to mention the nasty criminal record), and pumping cash into problems that deal with the symptoms rather than the cause of the disease are in error.

      Today's society focuses too much on trying to divert people or save them from their own bad choices, but tons of money is wasted on drug-related issues without effect. Big dealers rarely hit the jail because - on of the other ills of society - expensive lawyers find loopholes to protect them because they have the cash to afford the representation. The drug issue is just one facet of an overall flawed system.

  2. There's no problem becasue.... by Neitokun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Soon the people against the music and movie piracy will claim that the survey is flawed. it's the same thing that the Christian Scientists and similar do when presented with proof they're wrong.

  3. Yep: Somewhat Biased by Gracenotes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did anyone notice that Pirated Web Videos is #5? Web videos include stolen background music, and stolen movies and TV content. I don't see where the line is between Web Videos and other pirated content, and whether certain money counts towards two issues at the same time.

    And organizing Illicit Markets by value is a bit tainted: money is not always correlated with prevalence. Just look at small groups of CEOs earning millions of dollars: overall, they're asmall minority.

    1. Re:Yep: Somewhat Biased by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Funny

      overall, they're asmall minority.

      actually they are usually large white guys.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  4. It Is Still Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No matter what the arguments are from either side, the bottom line is that piracy of copyrighted works is still wrong and shameful.

    The fact is pirates are enjoying the fruits of someone else's labor without compensating them for the price they are charging. There is no way that the piracy apologists can get around it, so they resort so stuff like this, and downplay any statistics they don't like.

    Wrong is wrong, even if this doesn't rank on the top of the list of evils in the world. Stop trying to justify this illegal activity.

    1. Re:It Is Still Wrong by HappySqurriel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The fact is pirates are enjoying the fruits of someone else's labor without compensating them for the price they are charging. There is no way that the piracy apologists can get around it, so they resort so stuff like this, and downplay any statistics they don't like.

      Well, I have already paid for the music I put on my CDs or iPod because the Recording industry forced a tax on these devices (it works out to be a couple of dollars per iPod and cents per cd); according to my legal system it is absolutely legal for me to download any music because I already paid for it through this tax.

    2. Re:It Is Still Wrong by Artifakt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No matter what the arguments are from either side, the bottom line is that lieing about the damages actually suffered is still wrong and shameful.

      The fact is media producers are vastly overstating the damage they suffer, in an effort to steal limited police services from other, more deserving crime victims. There is no way that the Media apologists can get around it, so they resort so stuff like this, and downplay any statistics they don't like.

      Wrong is wrong, even if this doesn't rank on the top of the list of evils in the world. Stop trying to justify this fraudulently illegal activity.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  5. So what about.... by Neitokun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The music companies that make billions off of work done by artists? They have a system set up so that they perpetually earn money off of something they never did. An example is the lawsuit against napster sooooo many years ago. The whole thing went to the labels, none went to the artists.

  6. Completely unsurprising by swillden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What a lot of people don't seem to realize is that the media industry is small potatoes. Seriously, look up some hard numbers aggregating the worldwide revenues and profits from music, movies, TV and video games and then compare them to the numbers from other industries. I did this a while back and found that any two of the biggest IT handful of IT companies exceeded the *entire* media industry. And IT is itself small potatoes compared to manufacturing, distribution, energy, agriculture etc. Any one of the major players in those real industries, the ones that actually make stuff, absolutely dwarfs the entire worldwide entertainment and media industry. Consider the fact that most of the music industry's US revenue is channeled through Wal-mart, and then consider what a tiny part of Wal-mart's business music is.

    Even if media piracy were absolutely massive, the net effect on the US and world economies would be almost negligible. Piracy can't be a major problem because media isn't major.

    But even though media is small potatoes financially, what they have is a direct line to the masses. Because communication is what they do, they have influence, and therefore power, that is orders of magnitude greater than their real economic importance.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    1. Re:Completely unsurprising by dwandy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      What a lot of people don't seem to realize is that the media industry is small potatoes.
      Until you look at the number that's important: gross profit available to purchase politicians. While the sales in these other sectors is far larger than media, the dispensible income (and concentration thereof) is no where near.

      Intellectual monopoly laws create an enviornment of unprecendented disposable profit.
      Couple that with a political system that demands bribery as a requirement to win and we have laws that are disproportionately strong for the industries' true importance in the economy.

      --
      If you think imaginary property and real property are the same, when does your house become public domain?
    2. Re:Completely unsurprising by swillden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Until you look at the number that's important: gross profit available to purchase politicians. While the sales in these other sectors is far larger than media, the dispensible income (and concentration thereof) is no where near.

      Actually, profits in those other sectors *also* dwarf the profits in the entertainment industry. And, by and large, the political contributions are on a similar scale. The charity that manufacturing and agriculture extract from the federal government, for example, is mind-boggling. No, the only difference is that the media industry is more visible, both when they want to be and when they don't want to be.

      Even in the political donations arena they're small potatoes financially, but wield inordinate influence.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  7. NO WAI! by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That bidnez would lie to try and make a buck...

    Newsflash, business has long since departed the capitalism game and joined the "corrupt enterprise" market. Companies just feel "entitled" to make hand over fist of cash because clearly they're hip, happening, and all that jazz. Sales low? Must be piracy, because it can be in no way due to the COMPLETE AND UTTER LACK OF QUALITY OUTPUT. Or simply overpriced shit. I mean I like boxsets like the next guy, but honestly, a boxset of cartoons ain't worth 70$. Especially when I can score them off the net for 0$.

    Combine quality with fair market valued prices and you will see a return of sales numbers.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  8. Odd feeling by alphax45 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is this news? I get the feeling when reading this someone just made up these facts. The sites they are posted on seem questionable at best. The first link proudly displayed an ad for file sharing programs. Just doesn't feel right to me.

    Totally off topic but the new spell checker in Firefox rules!

    --
    K Man
  9. Media Cartels vs. Drug lords & Smugglers by cralewyth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The music, movie, and software cartels claim 'piracy' is a Number One problem not only for themselves, but for the world as a whole"

    Well, they obviously don't consider the other illicit markets a big problem.

    But seriously. Look. Marijuana is top, followed by counterfeit technology... next two positions are drugs. Then web vids, more drugs, then comes pirated software. There's 2 more drug markets and 4 smuggling markets before you hit Movies.

    --
    "Women are just like ninjas; They lie even when it is more convenient to tell the truth." ~ Unknown
  10. Counting oranges alongside apples? by cralewyth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On the havocscope illicit markets list, Drug markets are measured alongside counterfeit products and pirated products.

    The problem comes when figures for pirated & counterfeit products are from those industries, quotes of how much is lost... Now, somehow I doubt that the illicit marijuana industry value is based on how much that industry has lost. Considering that it is illegal in most countries.

    So here we have two sets of figures - one which is basically "estimated loss on profit, based from industry" and the other is "estimated products sold".

    Does anyone else see why this list isn't conclusive?

    --
    "Women are just like ninjas; They lie even when it is more convenient to tell the truth." ~ Unknown
    1. Re:Counting oranges alongside apples? by mei_mei_mei · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good point, and there's another 'hiiden' lie that this list holds, and that is that the two types of 'markets' ar combined at all. It makes it look like pirating movies is as serious as human traffficking! Of course not! The copyright infringements should be on another list entirely, maybe with other minor crimes, like illegal parking or spitting gum on the pavement.

  11. Counterfeit pharmaceuticals are a problem. by xplenumx · · Score: 4, Insightful
    6. Counterfeit Pharmaceutical -- Here's another place that the retail and distributor can excel at. Don't trust your distributor? Shop at one that's insured and bonded against dispensing dangerous drugs, or knock-off ones.

    I don't believe you truly understand the problems that counterfeit pharmaceuticals are causing - this goes far beyond some crook cheating a patient or someone sticking it to the 'rich pharmaceutical companies', but is a problem that creates disease pandemics and kills thousands.

    To give you one example, counterfeit antimalarial drugs are a huge problem at the moment and are threatening the lives of hundreds of thousands in Southeast Asia and Africa. Often times the pharmacies themselves aren't aware that they're selling counterfeits - in fact the proliferation of counterfeits is so bad in some areas that a large pharmacy unknowingly sold 100,000 counterfeit antimalarials and in a separate incident the entire stock of one Burmese hospital was found to be counterfeit. Simply shopping at a distributor that's "insured and bonded against dispensing dangerous drugs, or knock-off ones" doesn't appear to be a realistic solution.

    Simply testing whether the drug is a counterfeit is not necessarily a trustworthy precaution either. Due to the proliferation of counterfeit antimalarials, testing procedures were put into place. The counterfeiters got smart however, so they started to include low levels of the real drug in with their fakes. Now not only do we have drugs on the market that test as 'real' but don't provide enough of a dose to effectively treat patients, but these low levels of drug are rapidly creating drug-resistant malaria strains. Unless we're somehow able to stop this black market industry, soon we won't have any drugs left to treat malaria. How is this not murder of innocents for profit?

    While you may think that stopping counterfeit pharmaceuticals is 'ridiculous' and that it's a 'non-violent', 'non-crime', I most certainly do not. It is ridiculous to think that the various States of the world are fighting these issues, most of them are non-crimes and in most cases not even violent crimes.

  12. Re:MPAA and congress by Neitokun · · Score: 2, Informative

    You don't seem to get the point. The MPAA was INTENDED as a lobbying party. Why would lobbyist be in southern CA? They obviously would want to be near the politicians. They may work for the movie studios, but their job is in DC.

  13. It comes full circle by XNine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You see, the people trafficking monkeys and smokes make enough money to pump into other economies, like cars, homes, dining, etc. So essentially, they're probably pumping a ton of money into other industries, providing jobs and money for others. It's a double edged sword, I guess, when it comes to morality. But then again, had my company stolen a couple copies of windows, cut down on "HNIC" lunches, and not outsourced half the workforce to a company in Ohio who didn't care about customer service, just the number of calls they were actually taking, then I'd still have a job. So honestly, since these people are providing money to other markets and supporting their fellow man by doing so, I'm not so sure I have a problem with all of this. I'd rather be employed by someone that pays well and cuts a few legal corners, then be unemployed by someone who paid too much for the unethical and wrong services.

    --
    Never monkey with another monkey's monkey.
  14. For want of a soundbyte... by gsn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Special interest groups make up statistics that support their position... news at 11.

    --
    Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
  15. Law enforcement dollars by RareButSeriousSideEf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dear governments of the world: We're concerned & we want to help you make the most out of your law enforcement dollar. We think we can help. Out of a list of 29 items, we the sane people of the planet will permit you to ignore the vast majority of these for the next few years -- 22 of them, in fact.

    Furthermore, even though we're eliminating over 75% of the crimes on your action-item list, we are a generous bunch, so we'll only eliminate 50% of your budget. Given your newfound surplus (once you adjust, of course), we'd like you to apply the best possible strategy -- along with all of your remaining resources -- to making noteworthy progress against 7 high-priority items that actually impact citizens' lives on a day-to-day basis, in the order that they're listed below.

    You'll notice we're taking a middle ground on the drug enforcement thing, putting some on the list & leaving others off. Well, that's what you get when you realize that the sane people of the world include liberals, conservatives, and libertarians. Our views may differ a bit on recreational chemical policy, so in this case we agreed to leave you to enforce the ones currently wreaking measurable societal damage, and let idiots do as they will on the rest. That list may change over the course of time.

    # 8 - Human Trafficking
    # 14 - Human Smuggling
    # 25 - Small Arms Trafficking
    # 9 - Amphetamines/Meth (we're really just sick of looking at ugly teeth)
    # 6 - Counterfeit Pharmaceutical (I want my V!grr8 to do its job, dammit)
    # 11 - Ecstasy
    # 4 - Opium/Heroin

    When these 7 are no longer a problem, please see us about permission to prosecute any of the others. We imagine that there will still be other, more pressing issues once you've solved the biggies above.

  16. Overly strong verbage by jorghis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh come on now. The writeup has the phrase: "dragoon entire governments and police forces into acting as industry enforcers". Copyright law has been around for a -LOT- longer than the .mp3 format. The MPAA has not dragooned entire governments. The governments are simply enforcing copyright laws. If a convenience store is robbed will we see a headline on slashdot about 7-11 dragooning entire city governments to go after the customers of 7-11? Are we suddenly opposed to all enforcement of laws on slashdot now or just copyright laws?

    I remember when napster was the hot topic on slashdot and people ripped on the mpaa for going after napster when it was just a tool to search. "They should go after the individual violaters, napster isnt breaking the law!" was modded +5 again and again. Now a decade later the MPAA is doing just that, they are suing people who are violating copyright law. The old arguments were at least based off the idea that people shouldnt be allowed to break the law without fear of reprisal.

    The MPAA has a right to expect that copyright laws be enforced as they are written.

    1. Re:Overly strong verbage by Tinman_au · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, copyright has pretty well become only a secondary consideration since the media companies, et al, successfully lobbied the introduction of the DMCA. Copyright infringement is a civil matter, DMCA is more serious, it doesn't matter what the copyright status of the "protected" material is under the DMCA.

      If you try and reverse engineer the encoding/copy prevention, the government/police will be all over you, hence the "dragoon entire governments and police forces into acting as industry enforcers" comment I expect.

      At least thats my understanding of it, your welcome to point out if I have any of that wrong.

  17. Why no official claims then? by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the media companies are confident of the value of their losses to piracy, why do they not report these losses to the IRS?

    Is it not fraudulent to incur such huge losses and *not* report them?

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.