Slashdot Mirror


IE7 Blocking Google Image Search?

An anonymous reader writes, "I just tried a Google Image Search in IE7 for the first time. Whenever I click on an image, my browser tells me in big bold letters, "This is a reported phishing website." Try it yourself: make sure automatic phishing detection is turned on and do an (adorable) image search; click on one of the result thumbnails. MSN Live Image Search has no such issues. Insert Microsoft evil conspiracy theory here." I get this behavior under IE7, Win XP Pro, SP2, Parallels, Mac OS X.

35 of 253 comments (clear)

  1. And your point is? by blanchae · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nothing to see here move on...

    1. Re:And your point is? by dotgain · · Score: 2
      I tagged this article: 'slashdothelpdesk'.

      I thought I'd seen some pathetic Ask Slashdots, but this is an all-new low.

    2. Re:And your point is? by toopc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Works fine for me in IE7. Turn on Anti-Fisihing, started Google, Image Search "Ferrari". First image opened with no problems.

    3. Re:And your point is? by ejdmoo · · Score: 5, Funny
    4. Re:And your point is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tagged: PEBCAK (Problem Exists Between Chair And Keyboard)

    5. Re:And your point is? by Moofie · · Score: 2, Funny

      I prefer the acronym "PICNIC" - Problem In Chair, Not In Computer.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  2. Strange by mingot · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just tried it. Works fine.

    1. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Same here. I spent hours last night looking for pictures of the adorable Scarlett Johansen, and had no problem doing so. Only problem I had was getting things to come up.

  3. I think not by maxrate · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seems to work well (properly) for me

    1. Re:I think not by Wornstrom · · Score: 2, Funny

      Try it yourself: make sure automatic phishing detection is turned on and do an (adorable) image search; click on one of the result thumbnails.
      I wonder how many slashdotters this "AC" will trick into installing IE7...

  4. Can't duplicate by KillerBob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Vista RC1 and XP Pro SP2. Not able to duplicate. Methinks PEBKAC.

    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    1. Re:Can't duplicate by monkeydo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or the "10D/0t" problem.

      Indeed.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
  5. No problem here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Using IE7 with XP Pro, fully updated. No problem at all.

    Maybe you should ask politely on some IE7 forums before trying to incite a controvery at slashdot? Just a thought.

  6. OMG CUTE by zdzichu · · Score: 4, Funny

    OMG KITTENS!!!!!

    So, basically any page with frames containing other pages is evil now? Thank you, MS.

    --
    :wq
  7. Never ascribe to malice that which can be by catbutt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    explained by incompetence.

    Its obviously not in their interest to incorrectly block google images. All it will do is make people not trust the phishing stuff, and turn it off. Incomptent maybe, but they aren't stupid enough to think that people would just stop using google images when they get blocked and use msn instead.

    1. Re:Never ascribe to malice that which can be by pegr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yet sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice...

  8. The real conspiracy theory by melonman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Guys, can't you see it, this article is a cunning plot by the Evil Empire to produce 3,000 /. posts saying "IE7 is fine"? How devious can you get? Stick to Firefox, and then you'll never get suckered like this!

    --
    Virtually serving coffee
  9. Your Search by tgpo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps MS is afraid of all felines.

    Lynx,
    Cheetahs,
    Pumas,
    Jaguars,
    Panthers,
    Tigers,
    Leopards

    --
    -tgpo
    1. Re:Your Search by tgpo · · Score: 4, Funny
      What, no pussy?
      If you plan on staying at slashdot you should get use to that saying.
      --
      -tgpo
    2. Re:Your Search by ettlz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, given it's in response to an OS X-centric post, that assertion is not necessarily so...

  10. Can anyone reproduce the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did the editors confirm this before accepting the story? Perhaps the submitter's computer has spyware which redirects web requests to another site!

  11. PEBKAC by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's Problem Exists Between Keyboard And Chair for those that haven't see the acronym. I have XP SP2 here and IE7 is in a basically default state since I use FF. Tried GIS and explicitly asked it to check and it reports "this is not a phishing webstie". It says that both for the main GIS page and after I did an actual search.

    Remember folks: FUD, it's not just from MS anymore!

    Seriously I wish people would stop with the crap but I really wish /. would not post things like this without verification.

  12. Meanwhile a bigger conspiracy is afoot by baadger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...the URL and query string and hence everything you are Googling for being passed to Microsoft's servers. Think of all those Google searches (and the following immediate clicks) Microsoft could extrapolate and use to improve their own search engine...

    1. Re:Meanwhile a bigger conspiracy is afoot by DavidD_CA · · Score: 4, Informative

      No. According to MSDN, only URLs that are not common are sent to the Microsoft server for verification. This list of not-common URLs sit on your machine, and even then only the base of the URL is sent to Microsoft for analysis.

      Here's the blurb from MSDN:

      Phishing Filter does not check every URL on the Microsoft server. It only sends those which are not on a known list of OK sites or those that appear suspicious based on heuristics. If an URL is checked on the Microsoft server, first the URL is stripped down to the path to help remove personal information, then the remaining URL is sent over a secure SSL connection. The communication with the Microsoft server is done asynchronously so that there is little to no effect on your browsing experience.

      So, for example, if you were to visit http://www.msn.com/ nothing will be checked on the Microsoft server because "msn.com" and other major websites are on the client-side list of OK sites. However, let's say the URL looked like this: http://207.68.172.246/result.aspx?u=Tariq&p=Tariq' sPassword, in this scenario phishing filter will remove the query string to help protect my privacy but it will send "http://207.68.172.246/result.aspx" to be checked by the Microsoft Server because 207.68.172.246 is not on the allow list of OK sites. As it turns out, 207.68.172.246 is just the IP address of MSN.com server, so its not a phishing site but this example should help you understand more about how Phishing Filter checks sites on the server.

      But thanks for spreading the FUD.

      --
      -David
    2. Re:Meanwhile a bigger conspiracy is afoot by cheater512 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How long until someone spreads a worm which adds pishing websites to the whitelist?

  13. What does NOT work fine... by JAB+Creations · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't believe this was posted without a screenshot! Sheesh! What does NOT work fine and IS worthy of Slashdot is the fact that most MS apps open websites up in IE regardless of the fact that Firefox is my default browser.

  14. Slow news day... by kiwioddBall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a slow news day isn't it? Still, kitten searches are all good.

    Look, somebody probably reported the Google Images header as a phishing website. Microsoft have probably since removed it from their phishing database. I'm sure they're refining the phishing technology so that websites require multiple reports before they enter the phishing database as we speak.

    But you kiddies can release all the conspiracy stories you want.

  15. Slashdot special by doktorstop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A good example when someone who has found anything in IE7 gets a headlight... even without checking. Either due to frames or not replicable by anyone but the author.. still.. OMG... its an IE7 error.. so it's got to be posted! Talk about conspiracy theries

    --
    http://www.automatiq.se
  16. Right Taco, NOW by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know all the users with IE7, you can block their IP's at will ;)

    I mean, it takes 39 people to say the same thing, thankfully I can't test it.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  17. Well, maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... maybe it really WAS a phishing website that he thought was The Google. Maybe, just maybe IE7 actually protected him in his search for adorable pussies.

  18. Re:Works great here by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As usual, this story is posted by our good friend kdawson, the editor who thought the Enlightenment icon was a state of being.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  19. Fixed already? by Rosyna · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember, the phishing filter that IE uses is "live". If a new site becomes a phishing site, MS can address it on their servers immediately. If a site is mislabeled, MS can fix that immediately. There's no definitions being downloaded, it's all server side.

  20. Re:Users should understand how Internet works?! by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 4, Funny

    kittens and puppies are *never* innocent. They're responsible for more than you know... if we drop our guard then they'll enslave the world.

  21. So true! by deesine · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've watched the phenomena happen live. Like many of us, I've tutored beginning and novice users on specific apps and general OS tasks. Maybe it's just the run of numbers, but some people, in spite of my instructions, will want to click on the button that gets them the furthest from their goal.

    I've also witnessed something a little more, well, let's just say metaphysical. A couple people I know seem to make computers crash or operate unpredictably. Anywhere from full-on crashes (on say, my computer that never/mostly never crashes) to problems that instantly go away when someone other than they are using the machine. Weird.

    --
    damaged by dogma
    1. Re:So true! by shinerweb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not wrong there...

      I've been called out at 4am in the morning because an important machine had lost all of its passwords and wouldn't allow anybody to access it causing a delay costing 10's of 1000's of $ for each hour it was down.

      I travelled 15miles to go in and press the caps lock button.

      That was some hourly rate I got paid that night....