Slashdot Mirror


Bomb Explodes At PayPal Headquarters

Pooua writes to tell us that an explosive device left outside of PayPal headquarters exploded last night. The explosion was powerful enough to knock out one of their plate glass windows but thankfully that was the only casualty of the blast. Perhaps they should have offered employee protection instead?

60 of 551 comments (clear)

  1. Shouldn't be too difficult.. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shouldn't be too difficult to find the culprit, just look for someone extremely dissatisfied with their service.

    Seriously, anyone who thought they were having a bad time of it with PayPal will find that experience pales compared to the bad time they'll have for planting a bomb.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Shouldn't be too difficult.. by wizbit · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shouldn't be too difficult to find the culprit, just look for someone extremely dissatisfied with their service.

      Great, that narrowed down the list by about two. Any other ideas?

    2. Re:Shouldn't be too difficult.. by amcdiarmid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I see that you have never tried to actually use "Safe Harbor" provisions. Lucky you. Paypal operates as a wire transfer service, and as a bank - with the regulations of neither.

      I actually tried to use the "Safe Harbor" once. First they told me that I had to wait for the account to be cleaned out. Then they told me to file with my credit card company. Some "Safe Harbor" I'm actually surprised it did not happen sooner, they really have screwed a lot of people along the way.

    3. Re:Shouldn't be too difficult.. by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Funny
      Great, that narrowed down the list by about two. Any other ideas?

      yeah. paypal set the bomb off themselves. now, if anyone complains about paypal's service, they instantly become a suspect in a 'terrorist' act.

      great way to guarantee customer satisfaction!

    4. Re:Shouldn't be too difficult.. by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Great, that narrowed down the list by about two. Any other ideas?

      While the first part of the post was in jest, that's probably exactly how the investigation will procede. Investigators will likely request PayPal turn over letters from irate customers. I certainly hope most slashdotters maintained their cool enough not to send threats.

      The news on KCBS was a bit more detailed than what the link told of. It's a four storey building in downtown San Jose. One plate-glass window was shattered, these windows are designed to withstand minor earthquakes, so it was said the explosion was powerful, not just a hand full of M-80's.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:Shouldn't be too difficult.. by Amouth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      that my friend is very evil.. and yet wise at the same time..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    6. Re:Shouldn't be too difficult.. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the UK they are regulated as a 'electronic money institution' under the Financial Services Authority, so Im happy. These regulations cover Paypals entire European business arm.

      Also, I must be one of their rare happy customers - two weeks ago somehow my Paypal account was compromised and several thousand USD was transfered around, with no fuss at all every single one of those transactions have been reversed at no cost to myself. All it took was 20 minutes to a local rate number, no queues, very helpful Irish call handlers.

    7. Re:Shouldn't be too difficult.. by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Funny
      Shouldn't be too difficult to find the culprit, just look for someone extremely dissatisfied with their service.

      There is absolutely no way that a customer could have planted this bomb. Nobody who has ever been a PayPal customer has any idea how to contact PayPal, let alone their actual physical address...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    8. Re:Shouldn't be too difficult.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Disgruntled high schoolers who plant bombs should be shot. All "disgruntled" people who plant bombs should be shot anyway.

      "Don't kill people, or we'll kill you." Doesn't it strike you as being hypocritical to have a death penalty when there's a law against killing people? Not to mention that in our system it actually costs more to kill someone than to keep them in prison for life.

      There's a fine line between terrorism and protest and while we all know how misused the label terrorism is, but I think if actual explosives are involved, it definetly qualifies for a big T label.

      You said it, kiddo: "label". Terrorism is a label. If you bomb the living fuck out of a country full of people you consider to be inferior to you, indiscriminately killing both soldiers and civilians, that's war; but if you deliver one bomb to a key location, that's terrorism. That's all bullshit. War is hell no matter what you call it. These bombers are using the only delivery method they have available - themselves. It doesn't make it right but it's important to understand that these people don't just get a stick up their ass and decide they don't like us one day. We carry out a systematic program of control over a lot of these people and when they realize it sometimes they become angry. We also have a long history of exterminating the civilians in countries that later on, for "some reason", become breeding grounds for terrorism. Frequently, we have set up a puppet government in these places long before any of this stuff happens, as well. In almost all cases we have provided the perpetrators with the training and often even the equipment used in the so-called "terrorist" attacks. Speaking of that label, don't you think people are terrified when we're saturation bombing their countries?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Shouldn't be too difficult.. by malsdavis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's scarey now that something like this - which is obviously a purely criminal act (one of vandalism and possibly GBH or even murder) - can now be called a "terrorist act". With all the negative connotations which are implied. I wonder what else our government will start declaring as "terrorism", surely any malicious act could ultimately fall under the government's ever widening definition of the word.

    10. Re:Shouldn't be too difficult.. by cshark · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or how about this:
      Since we're talking about hypothetical conspiracies.

      Paypal is owned by Ebay, who is largely controlled by the Saudis (don't actually know that, but it sounds good). The Bush Administration needed to demonstrate that we are still not safe in this country to the voting public (after all, it is an election year). So a call was placed to management at Ebay. Anyway, the Saudis worked with their contacts to find a bomber, who was more than happy to place the bomb (after all everyone knows there's no such thing as domestic terrorism, doncha know). And a deal was made, a bomb was placed, and a justification for ever more strict legislation was offered. Now to see if we take the bait as voters and elect more Republicans in California. Moo hah hah...

      I think it all comes down to this:
      Will Paypal start selling pie?
      I believe they will.
      But only apple, and you will be required to like it.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    11. Re:Shouldn't be too difficult.. by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thank you all, but we civilized people don't kill, maim or bomb anyone who we don't like for the last 50 out of ~8000 years.

      Fixed.

    12. Re:Shouldn't be too difficult.. by funfail · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, no... Somebody set up them the bomb. For great justice.

    13. Re:Shouldn't be too difficult.. by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thank you all, but we civilized people don't kill, maim or bomb anyone who we don't like for the last 50 out of ~8000 years, unless they have sufficiently large oil reserves.

      Fixed.


      Sorry, you had still missed a spot. Better now.

    14. Re:Shouldn't be too difficult.. by tinkertim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >> It's scarey now that something like this - which is obviously a purely criminal act (one of vandalism and
      >> possibly GBH or even murder) - can now be called a "terrorist act". With all the negative connotations which
      >> are implied. I wonder what else our government will start declaring as "terrorism", surely any malicious
      >> act could ultimately fall under the government's ever widening definition of the word.

      Sorry, but if you look at the word .. the shoe fits. Terrorism is doing things to make people fear for their safety in hopes they see your point of view. Its ugly, despicable and (you are correct) a very easy label to slap on anything of this nature.

      I really hope this was just kids being stupid. We (Gen X kids) all did dumb shit too, but we never endangered someone's life or physical safety in the process. Making someone piss their pants : fun. Making someone bleed : not fun.

      If it was a disgruntled customer .. sorry, but the T word fits and should be applied.

      I got a chuckle out of this too since nobody got hurt but someone very easily could have .. there's a fine line between prankish fun and violence.

  2. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What happen?

    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently someone set up paypal the bomb.

    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Operator: We get negative feedback.

    3. Re:Obligatory by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

      That'll teach 'em to say "All your money are belong to us".

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Obligatory by AgentGibbled · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dissatisfied Customer: "How are you gentlemen !! All your [plate glass window] are belong to us. You are on the way to destruction."

  3. Surprised it took this long by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man, if I had a nickle for every time I wanted to bomb Paypal, I'd have... er... probably a real hassle getting all the money out of my Paypal account.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  4. Great. Now if they start offering actual service.. by weston · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... then the terrorists will have already have won.

  5. Halloween parties at PayPal... by thewiz · · Score: 5, Funny

    are a blast!

    So I've heard.

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    1. Re:Halloween parties at PayPal... by Fozzyuw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Next time, I'd go with the "Treat".

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
  6. Not very big by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From TFA
    "Whatever caused this was pretty strong,' said San Jose Fire Department Capt. Jose Guerrero. "It's tough to break one of these windows."
    Er... As someone who lived in the UK during the IRA bombing campaign I can suggest that if the 'bomb' only broke a few windows then it wasn't exactly huge. Consider this atrocity

    Looks more like the sort of thing I used to knock up as a teenager - Sodium Chlorate and sugar anyone?

    --
    init 11 - for when you need that edge.
  7. I don't get it by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hear people rant about how terrible paypal is, I don't understand why. Someone please explain.

    I get a better deal with an ATM card through paypal than I get through my own bank. I actually collect interest on all my money as if it were a savings account. My "free" checking at my bank doesn't give me interest on money in my checking account. And if I put money in my savings account I can get fined for taking money out of it too often.

    If you want to go around bombing finanicial institutions why not go after the ones that are actually greedy and evil. (seriously I am not recommending this, instead of a bomb why not write a nasty letter or post a rant/complaint in your blog to boycott the company)

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:I don't get it by dontspamme · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your own bank is less likely to freeze all your money for a minimum period of 6 weeks and to end up keeping it all without having the possibility to do nothing about it.

  8. Funny? by Nos. · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I just don't find any of this funny. Planting a bomb anywhere but in strict controlled testing areas is not a joke. Obviously this was at least meant to damage the building, and possibly even to harm people. Imagine for a minute that you're a tech at this location, regardless of who it is. You're not responsible for corporate policy. Yet you're in as much, or more danger from an attack like this than those who do make the decisions.

    I'm just glad nobody was hurt, and that the damage was relatively minor. I hope the culprit or culprits are caught quickly, and dealt with harshly.

    1. Re:Funny? by otacon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most people aren't trying to make a statement by choosing where they work. They just want to collect a paycheck. Simple as that.

      --
      In a world of acronyms, the words are the real victims.
    2. Re:Funny? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ethically and morally I totally agree with you.

      However, due to an odd mixture of customer dissatisfaction, slightly warped senses of drama and poetic justice, and good old-fashioned schadenfreude, I still chuckled.

      Humans, eh?

    3. Re:Funny? by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Funny

      Kind of like all the contractors on the death star?

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    4. Re:Funny? by Lurker2288 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I allow my family to suffer because I refuse to profit from ethically-suspect (not necessarily blatantly unethical) actions, have I really made the most ethical choice? If not sending my kids to a good school damns them to poverty and ignorance, then don't I have an ethical obligation to them, as well? And hey, if the old lady isn't paying her rent, then isn't she being unethical?

      Ah, a little moral relativism after lunch. C'est maqnifique.

    5. Re:Funny? by TheViewFromTheGround · · Score: 2, Informative

      As an employee of the company, you most certainly are responsible for corporate policy -- at the very least, to the continuation of said policies. That alone doesn't justify the use of violent resistance against said company or its employees. Other things might, in utterly extreme and rare cases. More imaginative strategies, informed by creativity and imaginative forms of nonviolent resistance, are often far more effective and more ethically defensible. I work as an activist on the southside of Chicago, and one of the things I work on is police brutality. Lately, we've been had a couple of surprising successes in pushing reform, mainly due to precise and dispassionate factual evidence, a sophisticated analysis, careful targeting of officials with our message, an upcoming mayoral election, and alliances with elite lawyers who sometimes take them on. We haven't planted any bombs or threatened any officers. To the contrary, I respect and admire many of the police I known socially or dealt with in the course of this work, even officers that I have had deep disagreements with or who stop me for being a white guy in a black neighborhood. In fact, we have never tried to do anything big or dramatic, even in the tone of the narrative and design of the site. You can be effective by being dead-serious, factual, clear, and strategic in your interventions, without ever having to resort to violence.

      --
      Online citizen journalism from the inner city: The View From The Ground
    6. Re:Funny? by dAzED1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      agreed that planting bomb isn't appropriate.

      That being said, two things: honestly ask yourself which side you fall on the Palestinian/Israeli issue. Palestinian plants a bomb in a cafe' because that's all they can do, they can't attack non-civs with actual military success (note the "military" limit to the word "success"). By the same token, if corporation X deprives someone of their life, liberty, and persuit of happiness...do you really think the courts are going to care in this extreme capitalism world we live in? The side with the bigger lawyers wins. Little guy that lost $500 to paypal fraud can't do anything; the cost of any action to reclaim damages would far exceed the original damages themselves.

      Second thing: "You're not responsible for corporate policy" - wrong. Refuse to work there. If you work there, you should be held culpable for the actions of the company; at the very least, you should be held liable for any action of which you are aware. I've left places because I didn't agree with their corporate policy, business model, etc. Don't like what the Republicans are doing? Don't be a Republican, don't vote Republican. Don't like what Paypal is doing? Don't work at Paypal, don't use Paypal. Patronization of a product or service, or involvement in the production of the product or service, counts you as partially responsible for the ramifications of that product or service. Don't like factory farming? Then don't buy factory farmed meat. Think we are causing global warming? Stop driving cars and wasting electricity. Be responsible. If nothing else, thermodynamics; if you're willing to add energy to a closed system (like paypal) then you must be willing to accept the heat, as it were.

      If Paypal's offices were located in some small farming community, and you really had no other employment options that paid enough so you could take care of your wife who was dying of cancer, then fine, your responsibility is limited. However, we're talking about a bomb outside offices in San Jose...with thousands of other employment opportunities within walking distance.

  9. Re:Radiological?? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because the election is one week away.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  10. Re:Radiological?? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Wow. Why would the officials bother to mention that?

    Because it's very easy to get your hands on low-grade nuclear material, wrap it around a conventional explosive, and create a "dirty bomb" that will throw a bunch of nuclear crap around and render the neighborhood effectively uninhabitable until it can be cleaned up. Do it in the rain and that might require digging up tons and tons of dirt and hauling it off, etc etc.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. I imagine... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Chargeback my account eh!!?

    I imagine when some saw a headline "PayPal Bombed" they thought, "They certainly have."

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:I imagine... by shaitand · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "So let me get this straight, you see the biggest story on domestic terrorism in five years, and you think it's funny?"

      Yes I look upon this pathetic excuse for a terrorist act and agree that it is the biggest incident of domestic terrorism in five years the second largest in the past fifteen years, third largest in decades.

      With that in mind I look at the 'war on terror' we wage that has caused more terror and death than the United States has seen as a result of domestic terror. Yes, I find the situation so sad that it transcends sadness and can only be comprehended as a joke.

    2. Re:I imagine... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny

      What happened to "violence can be used for good?"

      Clearly this was done by North Korean agents. We'll be invading in fifteen minutes.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:I imagine... by AusIV · · Score: 4, Informative
      A window was destroyed and this is the biggest incident of domestic terrorism in five years?

      I suppose extremists firebombing a neuro-scientist's neighbor doesn't count, since they bombed the wrong house.

      And what about bombings at abortion clinics, which have been fairly widespread since the 1970's. A friend of my family works at an abortion clinic as a counselor who tries to persuade patients not to have abortions, and her car was set on fire by abortion protestors.

      I'm not sure how you define domestic terrorism, but it hardly seems that this is the largest act of domestic terrorism this year, much less out of the last 5.

    4. Re:I imagine... by Coco+Lopez · · Score: 2, Informative

      Biggest recent incident of domestic terrorism? This is nothing!

      Check out this link here for domestic religious fundamentalist terrorist incidents: Violence at US Abortion Clinics

      or these ones here for domestic ecoterrorists and general antiscience terrorism:

      http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/292/ 5522/1622

      http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/313/ 5793/1541

  12. Re:Radiological?? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because Kim Jong apparently had his paypal account frozen the week before.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  13. Re:What a shame by Rufus211 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What a shame the bomb wasn't bigger.

    I may not like some (a lot) of PayPall's policies, and I might wish paypall to go out of business. That said why do the 20-odd hackers that were in the building at the time deserve to be bombed?
  14. I'm not worthy of that opener...here is my best by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Luckily, Our president is not some "RANDOM" idiot..

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  15. Paypal's service is legendary by blueZ3 · · Score: 4, Informative

    and not in a good way.

    If you're using the service to buy and sell on eBay, and everything else in the transaction goes smoothly, then PayPal workd fine. However, if you have a problem (with a buyer or seller) and you try and take it up with PayPal, you're going to get screwed. Let me explain how it works:

    If you are a seller, and you ship and you "collect" money from PayPal and ship the item you sold, if the seller complains to PayPal (they can claim they didn't get the item, that it wasn't as advertised, etc.) PayPal will take the money out of your account because the transaction was "fraudulent" -- your loss: one item (which you shipped) since you won't be seeing the money. If you are a buyer, it works the other way around. If you pay for something and it never arrives, PayPal will refuse to refund the money.

    As far as I can tell, in instances where there is a dispute, PayPal collects the money for themselves and the buyer and seller are out of luck. Some of this seems to be based on "who complains first" but generally if you use PayPal and have a problem, you can kiss your money goodbye. Add to this the fact that PayPal constantly pushes linking your PayPal account to your "real" bank account (apparently so they can clean you out in one fell swoop) and you have a recipe for... well, I'd say about 5 lbs of ammonium nitrate, some black powder, and a time-delay fuse.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  16. Re:What a shame by Nastard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's the NOC (eBay NOC, at that) we're talking about. Would you really want a group of geeks to get killed because you don't like PayPal's service? As an employee in another NOC, I'm just glad none of our people were hurt.

  17. Re:Thank God ... by Kelson · · Score: 2, Funny

    I believe the proper term is "nukular," an abbreviation of "nuke-you-la'r," itself a contraction of "nuke you later," a traditional Texan greeting derived from the intense heat of a Texan barbecue grill. Essentially, one is saying that the other person is always welcome at a barbecue.

    How the term jumped over to fission/fusion-based weapons, I couldn't begin to guess.

  18. PayPal follow up email by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please rate your experience at PayPal:

    A) Excellent
    B) Good
    C) Average
    D) Poor
    E) Want to bomb your damn company

    Thank you!

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  19. I miss the good old days by moochfish · · Score: 2, Funny

    What ever happened to leaving flaming sacks of crap on a porch??

  20. Justice by StarvingSE · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While I cannot say that bombing the PayPal office is a good way to settle disputes, it still made me smile to read this article as I have recently been subjected to their horrible customer service.

    I am a casual ebay user, and probably sell roughly 10 items a year. Since paypal is the defacto standard there, I use them and have it linked to my checking account to transfer payments to myself. Well, I recently sold an old video card for $100 and was paid for it through the paypal service. Now, after hearing about people not being able to transfer their funds etc, I always immediately transfer the $$$ to my checking account. So, I have my $100. 5 days later, paypal sends me a notice saying that the payment might be fraudulent and is being investigated. 2 days later, they say it is indeed fraudulent, and that $100 is being deducted from my paypal account. Great, I already shipped the item, so I call paypal, spend an hour on hold, and finally talk to someone. The only response I get is "sorry, can't do anything about it. Sorry, can't tell you the reason it was fraudulent." Now I already have the money in my checking, so its not like I'm totally screwed, but I can't use my account becuase it has that negative balance on it. Any money into it will automatically go against it. I can't cancel either becuase of it.

    They also told me that my item was not valid for seller protectrion because it is an electronic item. Why the hell does it matter what item was sold???? I don't udnerstand why I am responsible for the fraudulent transaction when PayPal deemed this other users account valid and processed the payment in the first place. This is another example of a business who thinks that they can do business without any risk what-so-ever. Just screw the end user.

    btw... If anyone has had a similar experience and has some advice as to how I can cancel this account or otherwise solve the problem, please let me know!

    --
    I got nothin'
  21. I knew . . . by ElephanTS · · Score: 4, Funny

    I knew about this. I got an email saying that all of PayPal's servers had blown up and they had lost all my personal and banking information. Luckily I simply followed the link they provided (things must be bad over there - they didn't even use the regular PayPal URL) and updated all my info. Thanks to PayPal for their quick customer service and helping me avert this little disaster.

    Were eBay affected by this? I've just got an email from them now . . .

    --
    spoonerize "magic trackpad"
  22. For PayPal, No Sympathy by teneighty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been ripped off by PayPal twice, with absolutely no recourse whatsoever to get things rectified. The amounts involved are small enough that its not worth getting the legal system involved, but big enough that it's intensely irrirating. I think PayPal's business model is at least partly based on having free will to screw over individual customers in this manner.

    While I don't even slightly agree with the bomber's methods, I do understand what would drive them to do this. Individuals are powerless against PayPal, so its no suprise they will lash out any way they can. This is a classic terrorist attack in that sense - someone who felt they had no options left, so they turned to the increasingly commonly accepted equalizer: bombings.

    The very moment there is a viable alterntive to PayPal, I'll be switching (Google, are you listening? I'm getting desperate here!).

  23. Negative Feedback by daveewart · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Postage was quick, but the item exploded upon arrival."

    --
    "If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it." --- Arthur Kasspe
  24. Re:Customer service by friedmud · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually... the man is more on the spot than you know.

    I grew up in Missouri... and in my home city one of the larger industries is the call center industry. There are litterally dozens of _very_ large call centers in the city to choose from and they actually all pay well and give good benefits (they are competing for the workforce).

    The reason they're all in Missouri is because of the accent... ie. none. Most Missourians (disregarding the hill-billys!) have a fairly neutral accent which lends itself well to call centers. The land is also pretty cheap and the taxes are fairly low... combining for a great place to plop a phone center.

    So, anyway, yes... there is a lot of call-center outsourcing... but I do know that there are still a lot of call-centers here in the US and specifically in Missouri.

    Friedmud

  25. Sign of the times by Rich+Klein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This article has been tagged with "terrorism." I can remember when people would hear this news and think not "terrorism," but "nutcase setting off a bomb."

    --
    -Rich
  26. Re:PARENT = CULPRIT? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know, the kids who are shooting up schools have typically been the subject of a systematic policy of harassment that is carried out by the students but with the effective blessing of the administration which does nothing to prevent it. the people really responsible for the columbine massacre (for example) are the members of the administration who did nothing to prevent bullying. if I'd had access to a gun while I was in high school, there were times when I very likely would have brought it to school and opened up on some of the asshole jocks who used to pick on me when I was just a mama's boy too pussified by his fatherless (and even father-figure-less) upbringing to fight back and stand up for himself. I frequently felt suicidal and was perpetually depressed from about sixth grade up to the time I dropped out of college and took the CHSPE, which was a turning point in my life because I got away from the harassment. I no longer had people striking and tripping me as I walked by even when I didn't look at them, no longer had people constantly assaulting my self-esteem.

    But in fact this is all tacitly approved by the administration. I made frequent complaints in middle school, not understanding that fighting back would solve my problem. I finally got into a fight with a kid one-on-one, not a bully who strikes and leaves but just a kid who wanted respect and had no way to get it other than imitating the other kids. I gave him two black eyes and received an expulsion for my trouble - my reward for defending myself. Granted, I got a little out of control on him, but the school was willing to create a child who would get out of control when attacked, but not willing to protect him from violence so it wouldn't happen in the first place.

    There are only three [groups of] people who you can blame for school shootings, and the perps aren't in any of them. They are the parents who fail to give their children workable strategies for solving their problems, the students who bully them, and the school administration that permits and in the end even encourages bullying by not acting to stop it.

    Again, I was a really fucked up kid in school due to the way I was treated for being precocious, poor, and really tall, and it's a really good thing that I didn't have access to a firearm, because I likely would have used it. I was the kind of kid who would fantasize about that kind of stuff in class instead of doing my work because it's hard to concentrate on your schoolwork when you have to plan your exit from the classroom to minimize the time you spend next to people who typically assault you.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. LOL, I am going to be a suspect. by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have been with them for a long time too. I have allways been happy, but I had this one issue recently. I could not pay for an ebay auction because the seller requires a confirmed address. No big, I go through the steps to confirm, and get cycle errors. No big, I contact the seller and tell them about my issues, they say call paypal, and they can fix this for you. I contact paypal, and spend about 60 minutes on hold, and 15 minutes arguing with the "supervisor" about how waiting for 15 minutes and trying again is not going to solve my problems (they tried the classic "get him off the phone" routine.)

    I was extremely upset, and after spending almost 80 minutes (yes 60 + 20 in one call) on hold, geting into an arguement with the "supervisor" I decided it just wasn't worth it!

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  28. Re:PARENT = CULPRIT? by Dankling · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Simple question here: Do you have free will?

    --
    Slash-for-Thought
  29. Re:Radiological?? by Kelson · · Score: 2, Funny
    It might be easy for you, but I wouldn't know how to get my hands on that kind of stuff.

    Yeah. I'm sure in the future plutonium will be available at every corner drugstore, but in 2006 it's a little hard to come by.

  30. C.E.O.'s House - Better Target? by cyberscan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why target each other? The hackers were not the cause as far as I know. If people want to use violence, then they should select the correct target. I usually don't support violence, however, I can unsderstand why people get frustrated enough to do something like this. It seems that the little guy or the common person has absolutely no recourse when screwed by a big company. The police usually do not want to pursue people who screw over the common man. The FBI only assists if the amount is $5000 or above. Even a thousand dollars is a lot of money for the common person. However, governments do not care about the common person. It seems that the only way to fight back is by doing some sort of damage or breaking some law. I can now hear all of those "Well, if you do not like it, then do business with someone else people." The problem is that that "someone else" is also most likely a big corporation who also screws over some of their customers.

    I just encourage people who feel the need to take some form of disruptive action to make sure they only affect the deserving target. The last major L.A. riot is a prime example of the wrongful use of violence. Why were small businessess and innocent truckers attacked when the police were the target of protesters? It seems to make more sense to me for the rioters to burn down, rob, or vandalize every police precint or police car rather than small businesses whose propriators were probably equally appalled at the verdict. Rather than using violence to punish a target, I suggest other, more creative action that reduces the chance of collateral damage. Does the target have a toll free number? A computer or botnet can fine the target by repeatedly calling that number (from an untracable line). How about bad publicity? I noticed a guy who had lage signs on his car that stated "I got ripped off by ....." The guy drove that car around town and lots of people saw the sign. The targetted business almost closed down as a result. It is also easy to glue doors shut, cut air conditioning lines, use herbicide on landscaping, etc. Big business care about only one thing, and that thing is bringing in money. Damage the money stream will damage the company.

    A public utility is almost invincible against a customer who uses legal channels to file a complaint, however that same utility becomes very vulnerable to vandalism. It is deeply amazing what a crossed line, a closed valve, an open switch, or a plugged meter can do. It is also amazing what instruction passed onto others who are equally dissatisfied with service can also do. When a target is on the defensive it has to think of every way to prevent a malcontent from doing damage while a malcontent only has to discover a single way of exacting damage to be successful.