U.S. Government Prepares For Vista
IO ERROR writes "Patrick Svenburg, program manager for Windows Client Solutions in Microsoft Federal, answered questions from government IT managers today about the upcoming Windows Vista release. Many of the questions were about BitLocker, Microsoft's new drive encryption technology, as well as other security questions, upgrading from Windows XP, IPv6 deployment and more. Svenburg is a member of the Windows Vista Launch Team and is leading early adoption efforts for Windows Vista within the Federal community, according to Government Computer News."
Still got no threading and its been over 7 hours.
You don't know how much you miss something until its gone do you?
liqbase
"Svenburg is a member of the Windows Vista Launch Team and is leading early adoption efforts for Windows Vista within the Federal community" The USG should adopt a policy of never being an early adopter. Recently-released software generally has too many bugs to be used safely.
Child pornographers. I notice none of these people asked the obvious question about the destructive potential of BitLocker on the science of computer forensics.
SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
"early adoption efforts for Windows Vista within the Federal community"
Hmm... OK, I'll allow the "itsatrap" just this once; it makes sense here.
Now we have to wait until Windows Vista SP1 is out before the government can be fixed.
Does the U.S. Government (or any government in the world) get to audit the source code of Vista for themselves? If not, why not?
That means that any computer running with less than 2G of RAM and without a 7900GTX GPU is going to be tossed out as obsolete.
Bet on it! Cheap PCs are-a-comin.......
- The secretary level(basic Word, Excel,..). Something else would work fine.
- The Critical Service Level. Windows should be driven far away
- The Scientific User. They mostly use Linux anyway. The one exception is CAD.
So only the CAD'ers might need Vista, but they probably don't. So why does the gov care? And did I make a mistake in the list?Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
"Look lady, I know your ISA Client no longer works under Vista, but I am only a GS11. I am only allowed by law to turn off your transparencies, or tweak your ClearType settings. When I am promoted, they will let me defrag you, but only on Tuesdays unless it is raining, which means I can defrag only on Fridays. You need a GS13 to fix network shit, sorry."
You know, Microsoft usually has either extremely dull or extremely stupid names for their products or features, but Bitlocker strikes me as actually being pretty cool. And it's not every day that they do something nifty, so write this one down.
As for the asshats asking about why threading is disabled, GO READ ABOUT IT ON THE FRONT PAGE. A little research won't kill you.
If all my base are belong to you and I attempt to retrieve my base, does that mean I'm freebasing?
"I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
I think it's a joke that Microsoft thinks that BitLocker will allow us to more easily decommission computers. Right now we have to write the entire drive with zeros twice, then verify it. Or we can send them to be destroyed magnetically. There is no way that encryption will be considered good enough.
It'll be three years before a single agency goes vista. The testing and approval process is long and painful. DOD is just starting now to roll out XP five years after launch. There aren't compelling reasons to upgrade yet, and the third party support isn't there. Most importantly, the crappy administrators they get from learncomputersfast.com don't know how to work it yet.
People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.