Slashdot Mirror


Windows Chief Suggests Vista Won't Need Antivirus

LadyDarth writes "During a telephone conference with reporters yesterday, outgoing Microsoft co-president Jim Allchin, while touting the new security features of Windows Vista, which was released to manufacturing yesterday, told a reporter that the system's new lockdown features are so capable and thorough that he was comfortable with his own seven-year-old son using Vista without antivirus software installed."

22 of 361 comments (clear)

  1. If users can... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Run a program which sends out mass mails, or communicates with a server or does other actions then malicious people will write malicious code.
    Just because a virus cannot harm the operating system does not mean it is harmless.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:If users can... by indifferent+children · · Score: 5, Funny
      Run a program which sends out mass mails...

      You've stumbled across their secret plan. Vista won't run programs. 99.9% of Windows problems have been traced to 'users' running 'programs'.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  2. Also reported: by Spazntwich · · Score: 5, Funny

    Average user won't need Vista.

  3. Hindsight being 20/20... by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who plans on bookmarking this story so they can laugh heartily at it again in a year?

    1. Re:Hindsight being 20/20... by hansg · · Score: 5, Funny


        Who plans on bookmarking this story so they can laugh heartily at it again in a year?

      Don't need to. Just wait for it to be duped...

      /Hans

      --
      I don't have one
  4. I've used XP SP2 without AV for years by patio11 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Never had a problem. Of course, I use Firefox, a NAT, and don't visit porn sites or use P2P, which pretty much cuts my attack vectors to zero. Haven't had any AdWare in, hmm, 4 years or so either. I have AdAware installed on my computer but haven't bothered running it in about 2 years since it never picks up anything.

    Now I'm using IE7 as my main browser (quiet!) and don't anticipate any problems with it, either. Heck, its *more* paranoid than FF is some of the time (it will quibble about http refresh redirects to executables, for example).

  5. i have to concur by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    i've been trying it out, and vista works for me, naked on the internet, without a single problem. in fact i would go so far as to say that V1AGRA HOOD1A GR0W Y0UR PEN1S L0W M0RTGAGE RATES L0SE WE1GHT MEET BARELY LEGAL TEENS SEE HARDC0RE SHEMALE ACTION

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  6. LIghtening fast by luchaugh · · Score: 5, Funny

    That only took... what... 15-odd years. Seeing will be believing.

  7. I remember.... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ....when they announced that Windows 2000 would never have a Service Pack release. One would never be needed.

    (still have no use for XP, btw.)

  8. Jeez.. by FunWithKnives · · Score: 5, Insightful
    After summarizing that past statement, Allchin continued, "Please don't misunderstand me: This is an escalating situation. The hackers are getting smarter, there's more at stake, and so there's just no way for us to say that some perfection has been achieved. But I can say, knowing what I know now, I feel very confident."
    If you RTFA, and then go back and read the title of this post, it's quite apparent that it's sensationalist and stupid. Of course Allchin thinks that this version of Windows will be the "Most Secure Evar". He works at Microsoft. Taking what he said out of context is just childish. But really, I suppose I shouldn't expect any less.
    --
    "We may face a scorched and lifeless earth, but they're accountable to their shareholders first."
  9. Titanic by fizzix · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds a bit like some unsinkable ship.

  10. My first thought was... by Brad1138 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To laugh. It always surprises me when someone says "we'll never need this" or "computers will never..." I remember a computer magazine editorial saying we would never store music on Hard Drives, it would take up to much space. These people never seem to think more that a few months or maybe a year into the future.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  11. all a ploy to make more $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    See, if you don't run av, then when you get infected, you'll have to reload vi$ta (which they only let you do once). Then, you'll have to buy another copy of said OS.

    Brilliant marketing $cheme

  12. @LiquidCoooled, about zombies by Toveling · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Windows Vista severly limits access to raw packet sending to non-priviledged apps, meaning that packet forging is much more difficult. Although the zombies that are sending seemingly alright content (at the protocol level) aren't affected, those that are doing the SYN/ACK DDOS floods will be.

  13. Duh by ewl1217 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course a seven-year-old on a locked down computer wont be able to do any harm. Kids that age aren't into the sites (porn, illegal downloads, etc.) that are notorious for viruses and spyware. Not to mention that the kid's using a machine secured by parental controls and is most likely on a limited account. Wake me up when the average teenager can safely use Windows with an administrator account and no extra security software installed.

  14. Wait until he gets older... by Arakageeta · · Score: 5, Funny

    You'll need to start worrying when he turns 12 or 13. ;)

  15. re: Hmm, and where have we heard this before by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    rimcrazy
    Yea..........and 640K will be plenty of memory..........
    And the world will only need 4 computers...................
    And no one would ever need a computer at home..............

    Sheesh......where do they come up with this stuff?


    A new one:

    We will never have more than 16777215 comments.............

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  16. Okay... so perhaps it isn't that crazy... by RootWind · · Score: 5, Informative

    From TFA, it sounds like you really might not need an antivirus... if you lock it down with the parental tools so you can't download anything at all except from your own approved sites, that covers up a large malware attack vector that an antivirus is suppose to protect. After all, the role of the antivirus now and in the future will be that of a blacklist of known bad software. Everything else an AV does can be obsoleted.

  17. And XP has no buffer overflows... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Interesting
    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  18. It's not the viruses you need to worry about... by NeumannCons · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Viruses, these days, are not what you need to worry about.

    The main attack vectors these days seem to center on "drive by downloads" or pop ups that trick you into downloading executables ("WARNING! Your PC is infested with SPYWARE - CLICK HERE to remove"). Most Antivirus software is unbelievably pathetic when it comes to identifying/dealing with spyware. I've seen dozens of clients who have so much spyware, it can take 30 minutes or more to boot up and then spend more time closing all the popped-up windows. FF and it appears IE7 as well will hopefully go a long way to closing this attack. Now we just need to wait for everyone with win95,98,ME, NT, etc. to upgrade.

  19. No, seriously, by Go4Linux · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... and when his son becomes thirteen he will actually connect the computer to the network. ;)

  20. Antivirus is a cure worse than the disease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hate Antivirus products. They consume huge amounts of computing power, slow my computer down, and cause no end of frustration when installing legitimate network applications. In other words, the cost and overhead they impose is far greater than anything I've ever had to endure from viruses that I don't get anyway, because I'm not a complete idiot. I only log in as adminstrator when necessary. I keep up with patches and security updates. I keep my data, the only unique and irreplacable thing on my computer, backed up. I don't click on every idiotic funny ha ha attachment going around. I don't install software utilities from The People's Glorious Republic of Aziberjanistan.

    I suppose if you're dumb enough to think you need an Antivirus program, you probably do.