Slashdot Mirror


MPAA Goes After Home Entertainment Systems

philba writes to tell us that home theaters may become the new jurisdiction of our MPAA overlords. The MPAA is lobbying to make sure that home users authorize their entertainment systems before any in-home viewings. From the article: "The MPAA defines a home theater as any home with a television larger than 29" with stereo sound and at least two comfortable chairs, couch, or futon. Anyone with a home theater would need to pay a $50 registration fee with the MPAA or face fines up to $500,000 per movie shown."

26 of 402 comments (clear)

  1. The disgrace of it all by linuxci · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's a disgrace that the MPAA are doing this, who says it's up to them to control what we do in our own home. Does it matter if we're watching it on a 14" screen or a 40" screen or even on an iPod?? The MPAA have gone too far with this, I'm packing up and moving to a country where this can't happen. I bet Microsoft will support this move.

    Oh wait, it's satire :) Still, these sites shouldn't give the MPAA any ideas.

    1. Re:The disgrace of it all by davidmcg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh wait, it's satire :)That's what they want you to believe! Actually the MPAA only chooses ideas that the satire sites have rejected due to the idea being too crazy to be believed.

    2. Re:The disgrace of it all by JebJoya · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Although to be fair, TV licences in the UK are to pay for the BBC - commercial free TV. Since it's a public service, the BBC should either be paid for like that or through taxation, and at least this way you only pay if you are actually watching TV :)

      Jeb

  2. yawn by rm999 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bbspot is a satire site. This story is not real. I would have more of a sense of humor about it if the story was actually funny.

    1. Re:yawn by Linker3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Didn't ya know that Digg is Slashdot's Level 2 cache?

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
  3. Satire? by ddent · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is satire, right? Right? Please say its satire.

    1. Re:Satire? by witte · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's interesting that there is actually doubt enough, and that people would almost believe MPAA would try to pull something like this off.

    2. Re:Satire? by Cruise_WD · · Score: 5, Funny

      Indeed. I was quite happy to accept this as real until I read the comments.

      Actually, I'm gonna go further. I would, if I were a gambling man, bet that there is at least one exec in the MPAA /right now/ shouting at the screen in his little office, "Damn it they stole my idea! They're hacking my computer!" :P

      --
      [ cruise / casual-tempest.net / xenogamous.com / transference.org / quantam sufficit ]
  4. Yay for joke sites submitted as news! by GoNINzo · · Score: 5, Interesting
    You know, you really should warn us of the site you're sending us to in these kinds of cases. Because I wouldn't put this past the MPAA for reals.

    And the newly elected congress might be just busy enough to say 'sure sure' and pass something like this through.

    I prefer the other MPAA story they have on their site though: MPAA to Thwart Pirates By Making All Movies Suck (It would be funnier if it wasn't so true.)

    --
    Gonzo Granzeau
    "Nothing the god of biomechanics wouldn't let you into heaven for.." -Roy Batty
    1. Re:Yay for joke sites submitted as news! by Saib0t · · Score: 4, Informative
      You know, you really should warn us of the site you're sending us to in these kinds of cases.
      "from the jokes-that-some-people-just-wont-get dept." and the foot icon "it's funny, laugh" should be more than enough for everyone. Except the blind ;-)
      --

      One shall speak only if what one has to say is more beautiful than silence
  5. I dunno what's scarier by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That some people don't get the joke or that I can understand well why they don't.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. Re:There is something worse by pryonic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They did notice, it's from the "jokes-that-some-people-just-wont-get dept" if you look at the header of the article. Just a bit of humour.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  7. Re:This can't _be_ real. by linuxci · · Score: 5, Funny

    Still has a long way to go before it beats my favourite satire site

  8. MPAA: So retarded this stuff's actually plausible. by Cordath · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't understand the MPAA. In ways they're even more idiotic than RIAA. Let's take an example...

    I'm sure most people have come across MPAA's anti-piracy adds. For example, there's that one that starts out by saying:

    "YOU WOULDN'T STEAL A CAR..."

    Now, let's just stop for a moment and consider the one segment of viewers who are 100% guaranteed to see this ad: Legitimate customers. What is the car-world equivalent of legitimate customers? Car owners. When was the last time you got into your car and saw a big sign saying "YOU WOULDN'T PIRATE A MOVIE!" spraypainted across your windshield? What about the candy equivalent? How often do you buy a Coffee Crisp only to open it up and find, drizzled onto the top of the bar in iridescent-green super-sour gummy, "YOU WOULDN'T POACH ELK OUT OF SEASON...". Does IHOP serve pancakes with motor-oil drizzled on top of them to spell out "YOU WOULDN'T EAT YOUR NEIGHBOR'S KIDNEY WITH A NICE CHIANTI AND SOME FAVA BEANS..."

    Only the MPAA is insane enough to take the one thing they have to offer a customer and deliberately vandalize it in a way that only their legitimate customers are likely to see. The scary thing is that these morons have enough money to lobby the government for stuff nearly as crazy as in the linked spoof. Maybe it wouldn't be such a bad thing if people did pirate movies a little more so that the MPAA didn't have quite so much money to throw around in Washington.

  9. I know it's satire, but... by digitalhermit · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...don't you have the tiniest fear that someone in MPAA headquarters isn't reading and thinking, "Great Scott!! It's brilliant!"

  10. Re:MPAA: So retarded this stuff's actually plausib by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ironically, I hate those ads so much that it's rather put me off buying DVDs. I guess that means at least I'm not going to copy it.

    A friend of mine simply copied all her discs to her PC to circumvent it.

  11. Re:MPAA: So retarded this stuff's actually plausib by MemoryDragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually the funny thing is, that those ads probably are one of the major factors why moviegoer numbers are steeply declining. First of all there are the ads, then the insults and then the trailers. I guess the insults pushed it over the top for many. If I look into my own surrounding, there used to be a lot of people who went to the theatre once a week. Nowadays it is only twice per year, and it basically was due to the ads, and the insults. I recently went with them into a movie, after 10 minutes of constant ads we were close to walking out, the following piracy insult basically did it to ruin the experience entirely! Needless to say, no theatre visit anymore for the following months by anyone of us!

  12. Re:MPAA: So retarded this stuff's actually plausib by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know about you, but I enjoy being patronised and accused of being a criminal. Insults just add to the experience.

  13. Re:MPAA: So retarded this stuff's actually plausib by simm1701 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Every time I see those adds I want to report them to the advertising standards agency for making false claim and accusations.

    How I understand it making a private copy of a dvd, or downloading one (ie piracy by their definition) is breach of copywrite, which is a civil offense, not a criminal offense.

    Since it is not a criminal offense then it cannot be described as a crime (by the definition of the word).

    Since the advert says it is it is suggesting that people who may or may not be commitinga civil offense are criminals which seems to me is slander...

    But then again IANAL, though I would find it ratehr amusing if the ASA banned their trailers in the uk til they changed them (same for the ones about TV licenses for those that don't have or want TV but thats a completely different rant)

    --
    $_="Slashdotter";$syn="OTT";s;..;;;sub _{print shift||$_};s!ash!Perl !;s=$syn=ack=i;tr+LLEd+BLAH+;_"Just Another ";_
  14. Re:MPAA: So retarded this stuff's actually plausib by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, each time I'm subjected to those adds I get the urge to imitate "Gone in 60 seconds" with the MPAA staff's cars. Now that would answer their rethoric question.

  15. Re:MPAA: So retarded this stuff's actually plausib by jasontheking · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if someone does a movie parody , I'd love to see a fake add that says

    "you wouldn't doctor your books to get zero profit as a tax dodge"
    "you wouldn't offer unsuspecting people the chance of a percentage of non-existant profits"

    and so on.

  16. The worrying thing is it's believable by unts · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem with satirical articles about the MPAA is that they have to get well beyond the realms of reality before they stop being believable.

    Don't forget that here in the UK we have TV licensing. Home Theatre licensing isn't so far fetched from that.

    Satire? Looks like they're just giving the MPAA more great ideas... We're doomed!

  17. Re:MPAA: So retarded this stuff's actually plausib by shigelojoe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ironically, I copy the movies off DVDs just so I don't have to watch that crap.

    Ironically, I copy the movies off DVDs then erase the files from my hard drive just so I don't have to watch the movies.

  18. Errr... :-/ by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I realized that this article was from BBSpot, I didn't know whether to laugh or be relieved...and that's a frightening thought.

    Seriously. We have to do something about these media cartels before articles like this stop being satire.

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  19. Re:MPAA: So retarded this stuff's actually plausib by fotbr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've seen that commercial exactly once. I bought the DVD of Office Space, got home, saw that, and went right back to the store to return the movie. Amazingly enough, walmart WILL take opened DVDs back, for a refund (not "another copy"), if you claim it is defective and are patient enough to wait while they find the store manager. I explained that I had expectations of seeing the movie I paid for, not a 5 minute insult that I couldn't skip, and therefore the product was defective as designed, and another copy would not be acceptable.

    I will not be buying any more DVDs. I already don't go to theaters. I just wish I could find contact information for Fox Home Entertainment to tell them WHY their anti-piracy insults have now hit their bottom line (even if it is only a few dollars / year).

  20. Re:MPAA: So retarded this stuff's actually plausib by Hack'n'Slash · · Score: 5, Funny

    "If I didn't feel robbed, cheated, and insulted in the movie theatre, where else could I go to feel like that?"Isn't that what marriage is for?