Slashdot Mirror


Acoustic Sensors Make Any Surface a Touch Pad

An anonymous reader writes "Using cheap acoustic sensors the surface of any 3D object can be instantly made into a touch-sensitive interface capable of tracking two objects at once. Its creators are planning to make hospitals more hygienic — keyboards and mice will be replaced by desks wired to perform as keyboards and touchpads. A video shows it in action [.wmv]."

142 comments

  1. In space.... by fitten · · Score: 1, Funny

    no one (not even your computer) can hear you typing!

    1. Re:In space.... by mrjb · · Score: 1

      BZZZZZZZT wrong :) Sound needs a medium to propagate. This medium isn't restricted to air, however. Your desk will do fine as a medium to transfer vibrations, and if acoustic sensors are attached to it firmly enough, they will pick up the typing vibrations just fine, even in a vacuum.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    2. Re:In space.... by Dabido · · Score: 1

      'they will pick up the typing vibrations just fine, even in a vacuum.'

      Except, in a vaccuum, no one can hear you type ... as you've died from lack of air! Of course, what the technology interprets as typing while you're going into convulsions might be interesting to try to read. :-)

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  2. New PDA Feature? by blaster151 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hospitals? Not the first application that would have come to mind, but a little extra hygiene never hurt anyone. (Cue jokes about Slashdotters) I'm more interested in the portable computing applications. Does this mean that we could sit down at Starbucks, whip out a PDA equipped with this device, and have the table surface become a full-sized keyboard/mouse arrangement? That would be sweet!

    1. Re:New PDA Feature? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      this has been out for two(?) years
      http://www.virtual-laser-keyboard.com/

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    2. Re:New PDA Feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be a good use for this technology if it worked. I would like if I did not need a mouse and keyboard for my desktop. I would just activate the acoustic pick up and type. When I want to stop, I deactivate the pickup and my desk space can be used for something else.

    3. Re:New PDA Feature? by diersing · · Score: 0
      Its creators are planning to make hospitals more hygienic
      Well, how nice for them. I plan on forcing the world's population to pay me a small tax, I have a flag and everything.

      Seriously, the creators always have big plans of making riches, that's what keeps most of them going, untold fortunes and all. Theres nothing really new here. Now, if they can project the surface via a hologram and then track my motions and interrupt interaction (ala Minority Report and similar movie scenes), that would be cool.

    4. Re:New PDA Feature? by MajorDick · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you already can buy a roll keyboard. You would need something to be able to SEE where the keys were. Hence, a LASER keyboard like the one at thinkgeek. Much more "Im Cool , you SUCK" factor from Starbucks types. http://www.virtual-laser-keyboard.com/ Im thinking more Minority report with a BIG piece of tempered glass and a projector.

    5. Re:New PDA Feature? by NotTheNickIWanted · · Score: 2

      Strictly speaking, no it has not. While the end result may be similar, TFA concerns the use of a piezo-acoustic system to detect a "keypress"; the URL you provided describes a product which relies upon an optical system.

      --

      unsigned int question = 0x2B | ~(0x2B)
    6. Re:New PDA Feature? by orasio · · Score: 2

      Strictly speaking, no it has not. While the end result may be similar, TFA concerns the use of a piezo-acoustic system to detect a "keypress"; the URL you provided describes a product which relies upon an optical system.Stricly speaking, the guy was answering a post about typing on a full-size keyboard on Starbucks tables.
      That could be done with the laser keyboard, more than 5 yearss ago at the prototype level, and some time later as a commercial product.

    7. Re:New PDA Feature? by mikael · · Score: 1

      Even simpler, just have a sheet of glass/perspex engraved with the keyboard letters. Easy to wipe clean and maintain - no moving parts.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    8. Re:New PDA Feature? by pruneau · · Score: 1

      Well, since the ultrasound triangulation idea is neat anyway, but apparently lacks feedback, the two technologies could actually be coupled, the laser lighting up were a "key" has been pressed, or were the "mouse" is detected. I wonder however is tapping the whole day on hard surface like a table would not create strain somewhere in the hand/arm system. And what about ergonomic keyboard ? Could they do this on a curved surface that would be awesome too.

      --
      [Pruneau /\o^O/\ warranty void if this .sig is removed]
    9. Re:New PDA Feature? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      This is just speculating, but I'd bet that a no-moving-parts keyboard would not only be really strange to type on (no tactile feedback) but probably even worse as far as carpal-tunnel and other RSI-type injuries go - your fingers are going to be smacking a hard surface a thousand times rather than something a bit springier. Just drum your fingers on a table for a few seconds and then repeat on a keyboard, and see which one makes your fingers more sore.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    10. Re:New PDA Feature? by mikael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll agree with you there - back in the 1980's the first home computers came out. One guy at our electronics club got a ZX80 (the white computer with a flat keyboard), while another guy at our computer club had an Atari 400. When I had the chance to use these systems, I would end up having pins and needles in my finger tips after less than an hour. Fortunately, my Dad agreed on buying a computer with a full size keyboard to learn touch-typing.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    11. Re:New PDA Feature? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I don't know about this. Unlike most other flat keyboards, something that detected the slightest touch doesn't seem like it should stress your fingers very much. You don't need to "smack" the hard surface with your fingertips, after all, just a slight tap will do. The flesh on your fingertips should be a sufficient shock absorber. This is different from a conventional keyboard where your fingers have to exert significant force to push the keys down; here the springs inside the keys are useful not just for feedback, but to reduce shock in the finger joints. If you just have a keyboard image projected on a flat surface, for example, you simply don't need to exert much force with your fingers. Of course, people used to conventional keyboards (like my Model M) will have some trouble adjusting to not needing to use any force.

      The only problem I see with this whole thing is that you'd have to always keep your hands hovering over the flat surface instead of being able to rest them on your "keyboard" like you can currently.

    12. Re:New PDA Feature? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1
      I agree about keyboard use... I see this as more of a touch screen replacement, or an audio mixer's dream! Notice that you can have multiple points sensed at the same time... this could be great for any 2-D scrubber application, including graphical art, volume/frequency shifting, scroll/zoom, virtual percussion instruments, etc.

      I do wonder what this could do when coupled with those suction cups that make a flat surface into a stereo speaker though ;)

  3. vibration by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd be interested in knowing what would happen when someone turned on the radio and they started playing GWAR...

    1. Re:vibration by Pink_Ranger · · Score: 3, Funny

      Simple. Everyone with good taste in music (and no sense of humor) would get up and leave.

  4. And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ??? by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1, Troll

    Hospitals are dirty becuase they outsource their cleaning to companies that employ mostly low paid, un(der)trained staff.

  5. Corners? by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Did anyone else notice that the video doesn't show then using the corners of the touchable region? I'm curious whether the system is reliable when one sensor is very close to the source of the vibrations.

    1. Re:Corners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the other link in the article http://www.taichi.cf.ac.uk/files/Sound_Rose-Genoa_ Web.wmv shows,
      the whole of the surface is touchable. Even the area outside the sensor-square as well as the area next to each sensor.

    2. Re:Corners? by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 1

      That video was mad prior to their demonstrations of their "new" technology, and only shows point touches, which are easier to locate. The "new" technology is in tracking a continuously moving point. They might very well be able to do it, but I would have expected them to show that they could. I base my concerns on watching the guy draw a question mark an have some noticable difficulty lining up the dot below the first stroke.

  6. Space Invaders by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The whole surface of your desk could become your keyboard and mouse-pad."

    The video and descriptions show only a flat surface of a 3D object. All real objects are 3D, but few have empty flat surfaces across their entire working area.

    Will this thing work with the 3D surface of my cluttered desk? I doubt it will track the position of my fingertips on a piece of paper after I've picked it up from the desk, without sensors attached to the paper.

    When these sonar sensors can actually track objects inside a 3D volume, not just across a surface in 3D space, they'll have made a major leap in UI. Until then, I don't see how these sensors are different from the touchscreen bezels mounted on monitors for years, except they've figured out how to discard the frame, and supposedly do without calibration.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Space Invaders by PartPricer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's hope that this thing can be adapted to work on all 3D surfaces. Imagine cybersex where you can have both hands on the keyboard.

    2. Re:Space Invaders by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Imagine cybersex where you can touch the actual bodies as UIs to control the lighting, heating, music, cameras, vibrators. In the room and across the Net.

      These sensors on a bodyglove could make teledildonics not only practical, but portable and spur-of-the-moment.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Space Invaders by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Imagine cybersex where you can touch the actual bodies as UIs to control the lighting, heating, music, cameras, vibrators. In the room and across the Net.

      Imagine actual sex.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    4. Re:Space Invaders by farker+haiku · · Score: 0, Troll

      All real objects are 3D

      Um, like shadows? Or are shadows not real?

      --
      Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
    5. Re:Space Invaders by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'd explain it to you, but you wouldn't believe me.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:Space Invaders by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Shadows are real, but they're not objects. They're an absence of light traveling from an object.

      Now, if you'd tried "all real objects are 4D", you might have something. Though really objects are fractal, as time isn't even an integer dimension.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:Space Invaders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rosie doesn't count.

    8. Re:Space Invaders by waif69 · · Score: 1

      Imagine the book that could be written through this method. Of course it might take longer for some slashdotters than others.

    9. Re:Space Invaders by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      I think that's the point.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    10. Re:Space Invaders by profplump · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Shadows are 3D, you just only see the edge -- I'd include the entire space from the dark side of the light-blocking object to the surface on which you observe the shadow as part of the shadow, as any object in that space would reveal the shadow. You could even argue that shadows continue indefinately beyond the surface on which you observe them, as any objects along that path would similarly be shadowed.

      But I'd also agree with others that shadows are no more objects than radio waves.

  7. I see a potential problem... by EzraSj · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is clear discrimination against Ninjas, who obviously don't make a sound even when playing a round of quake.

    --
    Meta, Meta, Meta
  8. Laser Keyboard by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    I've already seen laser keyboards that spread over a flat surface for PDAs. I wonder how they sense where you are typing, but now that I think about it, I would like to have a silent keyboard. I just wonder how difficult it is to type when you can't get a physical feel for the keyboard.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Laser Keyboard by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I'd imagine it would be a trivial task to build a small, textured rubber keyboard template that could be placed on a desk, thus providing the necessary tactile feedback. Make it dishwasher safe, and voila, you have a cheap, easy-to-sterilize keyboard.

    2. Re:Laser Keyboard by EMeta · · Score: 1

      The laser keyboards, while cool, are actually very annoyingly inaccurate. You can sorta set them up to give them an optimal read pattern, but you still get mistaken entries unless your fingers move in a very very rigid way. Because of mistakes they tend to be considerably slower than even thumpads used one-handed (and I'm not even that good with them).

    3. Re:Laser Keyboard by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1
      Sorta like the VIK?. All it needs is to be tweaked so you can autoclave it :D

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    4. Re:Laser Keyboard by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Something like that. However, the advantage of a template and a table-keyboard is that the template need not have any sensitive electronics in it. This means you can build it out of a tough synthetic of some type which could, as you say, be run through an autoclave, exposed to harsh chemicals, etc.

    5. Re:Laser Keyboard by hgavin · · Score: 1

      The one I saw and tried used IR to determine the distance and angle of the finger from the sensor.

  9. A boost to furniture makers? by howlatthemoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So what happens when these are built into the furniture and the "mouse" goes bad? Will you need to buy a new desk?

    1. Re:A boost to furniture makers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So what happens when these are built into the furniture and the "mouse" goes bad? Will you need to buy a new desk?


      Not only that, but if the desk is built into the building, do you have to build a new building to get keyboard / mouse working?

    2. Re:A boost to furniture makers? by neimon · · Score: 1

      And if malware infests, then you have to burn the building down and reinstall it...

    3. Re:A boost to furniture makers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So what happens when these are built into the furniture and the "mouse" goes bad? Will you need to buy a new desk?
      Or you could... I don't know... buy a mouse?
  10. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by bogaboga · · Score: 1
    Hospitals are dirty becuase they outsource their cleaning to companies that employ mostly low paid, un(der)trained staff.

    So, according to you, an entity cannot be "low paid" and "clean." Right? But I can assure you that when death is demanding a visit to your household, you will not think of the "cleanliness" you appear to crave.

    On the other hand I have an issue with the headline. Consider:

    A video shows it in action [.wmv].

    When shall we have a video in an Open Source format like .ogg? If slashdot could transform the videos to open source formats before posting the stories, this could be a very welcome development.

  11. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by SoapDish · · Score: 2, Informative

    Because it's much easier to clean a flat surface rather than a keyboard, or even a mouse.

  12. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Whatever the touchable surface is, it will have germs.

    And NOT because of the poorly paid staff.

    The source of germs in hospitals is SICK PEOPLE. Come on folks, how long are we going to let these sickos with their sniffles and oozing infections dirty up our hospitals ? I think we need a fence, and strick jail-the-ill legislation with no possibility of parole.

  13. From TFA: by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1
    "We could have a keyboard drawn onto the desks that would work perfectly and could be disinfected much more easily."


    Yeah, or you could have a membrane keyboard, like they do at fast food restaurant cash registers. If the solution already exists, and has existed for decades, why hasn't it been implemented? So some high-dollar high-tech overkill solution can be found instead?
    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:From TFA: by vonPoonBurGer · · Score: 1

      Maybe because hospitals have more complex data entry needs than "Combo #3 with Fries"? I work for a medical systems vendor, efficiency is vital to these organizations, both for patient care and for their bottom line. There's no way in the world a radiologist would be willing to enter reports on the kind of keyboard you're talking about.

    2. Re:From TFA: by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      So some high-dollar high-tech overkill solution can be found instead?

      "High-dollar"? What part of "cheap acoustic sensors" did you not understand?

      Meanwhile, here's a link for a membrane keyboard designed to be chemically resistant and easy sterilized. $545 doesn't seem terribly cheap to me.

    3. Re:From TFA: by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      You can't get a plastic keyboard clean enough, often enough, no matter how hard you try. Someone will breathe on it or touch it constantly. But a flat surface, ceramic or steel, can be rubbed down with alcohol in seconds.

    4. Re:From TFA: by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Maybe because hospitals have more complex data entry needs than "Combo #3 with Fries"? I work for a medical systems vendor, efficiency is vital to these organizations, both for patient care and for their bottom line. There's no way in the world a radiologist would be willing to enter reports on the kind of keyboard you're talking about.

      And they'd be willing to enter reports on an essentially flat surface with even *less* tactile feedback than a membrane board?

      -b.

  14. Is it really practical? by Aneirin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is not the first keyboard implementation without a physical keyboard. There have been others that use optics which would be a lot more reliable since accoustics change with simple things such as background noise, the shape of the room, and even the surface being used. The big issue is whether people are comfortable using it. When other implementations have come up, people just didnt like the feel of hitting the solid material. Most slashdotters probably spend a bit of time figuring out what keyboard "feels" best to them just as people do with mattresses. However, I highly doubt anyone has an ideal keyboard that gives no tactile response. Although it may seem simple to change this precedence, I would note the USAs insistance on not using metric, and the fact that we still use QWERTY keyboards that were designed to be inefficient so that typewriters would not jam. I just don't see this past a niche market.

    1. Re:Is it really practical? by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      No, it's not the first, but it's important for a number of reasons. Most importantly, it's cheaper, piezo electric sensors are cheap and other solutions like I-Tech's Virtual Laser Keyboard are not ($180).

    2. Re:Is it really practical? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      > would note the USAs insistance on not using metric, and the fact that we still use QWERTY keyboards that were designed to be inefficient so that typewriters would not jam. I just don't see this past a niche market.

      Let me say that this is... well... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrjwaqZfjIY
      It's an urban legend. Read it on Wikipadia...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    3. Re:Is it really practical? by mungtor · · Score: 1

      1. Metric sounds like a nice idea, but really isn't in practice. With 12 inches in a foot you can divide it by 2, 3, and 4 without endlessly repeating decimals (and the need to make a 1/3 meter mark on the stick just in case). Base 10 lets you divide by 2 and 5, with not much call to divide things in fifths.

      2. QWERTY was not designed to be inefficient, but it was designed so that typewriters didn't jam. Ultimately, not having to stop to free stuck keys made typists _more_ efficent.

      Hopefully you're from somewhere other than the USA, otherwise there's some obvious commentary about the quality of our educational system.

    4. Re:Is it really practical? by LordSnooty · · Score: 1
      With 12 inches in a foot you can divide it by 2, 3, and 4 without endlessly repeating decimals
      By that reasoning, maybe we should shift the entire number system to base 12 and have done with it. Or do you think that counting in 10s is a bit easier?
    5. Re:Is it really practical? by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      Counting in twelves would be just as easy if the number system was base twelve. The only reason counting in tens is easy is because it's counting in ones, with a zero on the end. This would also be the case in a base twelve system.

      Frankly, moving to a base twelve system is only a bad idea because everyone already knows and thinks in base ten.

      Try cutting a pizza into ten slices. Now try cutting it into twelve. Which is easier?

      Historically, we've used base twelve numbering quite a lot - which is, of course, why the foot is twelve inches. The only reason base ten took over is because zero is more important than a convenient number base, and the zero was introduced in a base ten system.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    6. Re:Is it really practical? by profplump · · Score: 1

      I think if you were taught base-12 as a child rather than base-10 you wouldn't have any trouble counting that way.

    7. Re:Is it really practical? by mungtor · · Score: 1

      10 is only easier if you count with your fingers. If you can break free of that, you can count in any base you want. Doing math in hexidecimal is tough due to lack of practice, but certainly not impossible.

  15. Sensitive to false triggering? by FirmWarez · · Score: 1
    Two or more sensors are attached around the edges of the surface. These pinpoint the position of a finger, or another touching object, by tracking minute vibrations.


    Very cool idea, I wonder how well it deals with ambient mechanical noise? Just think, you set down your coffee cup and a mysterious message appears telling you to "follow the white rabbit" or perhaps some indecipherable gibberish like "411 uR b42e R 0wnz3rd" or something.
  16. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by owlnation · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While this point may be true in some cases, it's only part of the issue. There is a significant difference between dirty and unsterile. Cleanliness isn't the real problem, it's sterility.

    It is far easier to sterilize a flat durable solid surface than something convuluted and fragile like a keyboard. So, this is a great thing. And of course it has so many many many more applications too.

  17. Idea by pubjames · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Couldn't you combine this with a projector to make a wall you can "paint"? Could be great fun.

    Great for kids too - finger painting on the wall without making a mess.

    1. Re:Idea by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Couldn't you combine this with a projector to make a wall you can "paint"? Could be great fun.

      Great for kids too - finger painting on the wall without making a mess.


      Except that you'd be missing a key element to childhood development - the mess!

      People don't think in pure abstracts. Understanding concepts like mass, volume, friction, etc come from a "gut level" understanding that stems from our experiences with these things. The more firmly these ideas are grasped, (through childhood play) the easier these advanced concepts are later on in life.

      Ironically, in our push to have more "highly educated" kids by starting earlier, we're actually making it more difficult to have "highly educated" adults! Research performed in Australia backs this up - starting formalized education later improves the kid's performance later in life.

      By keeping kids in the relatively sterile and regimented classroom early, they miss the real learning they would get from play. Finland, for example, doesn't begin schooling of any kind until the kids are 7 years old, and quit when the child is just 16. So why do they have one of the top-rated education systems in the world? Somehow they manage to perform significantly better, even though we spend almost 50% more time at it.

      Isn't it nice to know that you spent twice as much time as you could have, in order to achieve an inferior education?

      As one more example - ever watch MythBusters? It's a great show, where they challenge myths with rudimentary science. Lots of fun, and lots of education about physics, mechanics, and so on.

      Ever look at their shop? It's forever a MESS! Half-constructed doo-dads all over the place! Messes aren't just not bad, they are frequently a good indicator that something real is actually taking place!

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    2. Re:Idea by Salmar · · Score: 1

      Couldn't you combine this with a projector to make a wall you can "paint"? Could be great fun.

      Great for kids too - finger painting on the wall without making a mess.How freaky! I was just thinking of a paint-less paint wall even before I read the article. Although, I'm not sure that this technology would be the best option, since it can only track two positions. Imagine a swarm of tots flailing their hands across the virtual canvas, while only one or two kids are actually affecting the projected image.

      --
      This is not the signature you're looking for.
    3. Re:Idea by pubjames · · Score: 1

      Wow. What a negative rant to a fun idea.

      Except that you'd be missing a key element to childhood development - the mess!

      Perhaps you are assuming that I meant my "painting light on walls" idea should replace all other childhood activities? I never said that. Perhaps rather than being negative about it you might consider how this might be a different experience for children that they might benefit from in other ways.

    4. Re:Idea by hador_nyc · · Score: 1
      Ever look at their shop? It's forever a MESS! Half-constructed doo-dads all over the place! Messes aren't just not bad, they are frequently a good indicator that something real is actually taking place!
      Only Adam likes the mess. It pisses Jamie off. I do agree that messes are great, and that parents should encourage that raw unstructured experimentation. Look back, or around, to the greatest scientists and engineers, and you'll find messy tinkerers.
      --
      - Mike
      Once you've lost your temper, you've lost the argument - Me
    5. Re:Idea by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you are assuming that I meant my "painting light on walls" idea should replace all other childhood activities? I never said that.

      There are 24 hours in a day. You are doing /SOMETHING/ during each of those hours, even if vegetating on a sofa.

      So how do you propose introducing some "childhood activity" of limited value without displacing "other childhood activities" which have provable, demonstrable, lasting value? (EG: the sand pit, a box of blocks or Legos, tempera paints - good stuff happens there!)

      I'm not suggesting that you proposed replacing all other activities - it's quite enough damage to reduce them.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    6. Re:Idea by pubjames · · Score: 1

      So how do you propose introducing some "childhood activity" of limited value without displacing "other childhood activities" which have provable, demonstrable, lasting value? (EG: the sand pit, a box of blocks or Legos, tempera paints - good stuff happens there!)

      You assume that this activity would be of limited value. You don't know that.

      I am not disagreeing with your belief that playing in the sandpit, with paints,etc. are very valuable. They are.

      What I don't understand is why you seem to believe that this activity would have little value. A wide range of activities would seem to me to be the best educationally for children - only allowing your children to do certain activities and stopping them doing others based on your (perhaps wrong) ideas about their educational value doesn't seem very clever to me.

    7. Re:Idea by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      What you are proposing is little more than Windows paint - only without even the positive feedback of a screen behind it.

      So I ask you: What value can you concieve of that is in any way "educational"?

      For that matter, how is this functionally different than, say, a Wacom board? They've been around for a long, long time...

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    8. Re:Idea by pubjames · · Score: 1

      So I ask you: What value can you concieve of that is in any way "educational"?

      Ok, so it is inconceiveable to you that painting light onto a wall with your hands could be a fun and educational activity for kids. You believe in limiting your kids' experience to a set of activities that you believe to be educational. Poor kids.

    9. Re:Idea by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      I thought the whole concept was based on the wall being a large screen.
      Maybe instead of Windows Paint, they could have a wall sized version of Photoshop and Illustrator -- only easier to use for kids. :)

    10. Re:Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    11. Re:Idea by zobier · · Score: 1
      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  18. LCARS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Combined with a flat monitor as the desk, this is Star Trek LCARS right there. Re-configurable at the touch of a button, your keyboard /mouse can be anything. And this doesn't cost hundreds for OLED keys either.

    Count me in when they have a big keyboard working for this. But if it's acoustics, how do you get a key-repeat?

    1. Re:LCARS by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Picking up your finger makes vibrations too.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  19. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by vonPoonBurGer · · Score: 1

    The best-paid, best-trained cleaning staff in the world isn't going to be able to get all the germs out of every nook and cranny of a keyboard. By contrast, even the lowest-paid, least-trained cleaners can probably figure out how to wipe down a flat, seamless desk with disinfectant.

  20. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by MasterC · · Score: 3, Informative
    When shall we have a video in an Open Source format like .ogg? If slashdot could transform the videos to open source formats before posting the stories, this could be a very welcome development.
    When? Likely never. Why? That video is copyrighted by someone and you can't just legally copy it, transcode it, and serve it up yourself.

    Now if a slashsdot editor went to the trouble of requesting permission to host the video (the benefit to the video owner is to stave off /. effect) with the condition they can transcode into an open source format...then maybe. But when was the last time you saw a /. editor willing to validate, proofread, or desensationalize a story let alone contact someone, ask for permission, download, transcode, and host a video? Back to never again. :)
    --
    :wq
  21. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

    Underpaid staff is not the only problem. I remember having read that doctor's neckties were nice contamination vector for several kind of germs, but this is as offtopic as your point.

  22. Not exactly new by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 4, Informative
    It's not an exactly new method.

    Some 20 years ago, when electronic daisywheel typewriters were starting to take over, Smith-Corona/Marchant came out with a novel way to keep using their mechanical typewriter tooling. They used a conventional mechanical keyboard, where the keys stuck a bar of steel with a piezoelectric sensor at either end.

    The delay between the time the impulse reached each sensor enabled a microprocessor to pinpoint exactly where the bar was impacted, and thus deduce which key was pressed.

    That's basically the same principle applied, but in three dimensions.

  23. wrong way by John_3000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A better way to improve keyboard hygiene in hospitals would be for everyone to have his own personal keyboard, operated by the hand that holds it and carried in a pocket, wireless of course. Something like mine at chordite.com :-)

    But what hospitals really need is a way to sterilize hands up to the elbows in about 3 seconds. Think of boxes in the halls with holes you stick your arms into. When you press a foot pedal the boxes somehow magically *poof* and you're clean. Not perfectly clean of course but as clean as a current surgical scrub. If the boxes were handy enough and safe enough for doctors and nurses to use between visits on their rounds, hospitals wouldn't be infecting everybody like they are now.

    1. Re:wrong way by vonPoonBurGer · · Score: 1

      No, you're dead wrong. Each person having their own personal keyboard would mean they're carrying them around all the time, including when they interact with patients. It's bad enough that communal keyboards in hospitals are a germ warren right now, but introducing a situation where hospital staff bring their germ-laden keyboards into close contact with patients, that's even worse.

    2. Re:wrong way by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      A better way to improve keyboard hygiene in hospitals would be for everyone to have his own personal keyboard, operated by the hand that holds it and carried in a pocket, wireless of course.

      Better yet, speech recognition with disposable mics.

      -b.

    3. Re:wrong way by John_3000 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm thinking that as staff acquired more skill with their personal keyboards, they'd develop rules, like "leave the keyboard in your pocket during the visitation" and "don't rub the keyboard on the wound."

      Voice recognition still has problems, e.g., it's relatively power hungry and noise sensitive. It's also not private enough.

    4. Re:wrong way by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      They already have rules about things like personal sterilization, and they get violated all the time. How do you think staph transfers from patient to patient?

      Fact is, the minute you rely solely on personal habits to solve these kinds of issues, you're in for a world of hurt.

    5. Re:wrong way by russellh · · Score: 1

      the roll-up "indestructable keyboard" comes to mind. I think there is also a mouse made the same way. Something like it could be easily sterilized nightly, and maybe with a UV light on it during the day it could stay put. Or maybe they need regular disposable keyboard/mouse subscriptions. There's something humorous about tossing the keyboard in the biohazard disposal bin.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    6. Re:wrong way by John_3000 · · Score: 1

      Look: personal keyboards are like watches, eyewear and clothes, all of which visit the patient along with the doctor: cleaner and more cleanable are better but rules of good practice (personal habits) are pretty much all there is. Do you propose hygiene police armed with disinfectant sprays patrol the halls and pounce on doctors and nurses? It might work but it won't happen.

    7. Re:wrong way by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Does a doctor frequently touch their watch or eyewear throughout the day? Didn't think so. As for clothing, this is *also* a big issue. This would be why scrubs exist. 'course, medical staff are *supposed* to ensure their scrubs are clean, and they certainly shouldn't be wearing them outside the hospital. Funny how those procedures get ignored all the time, too.

      As for hygiene police, if resistant staph continues to proliferate, you never know, it might be necessary. But setting up the system so *more* procedures can simply get ignored? Frankly, that sounds like an even dumber idea.

    8. Re:wrong way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personal keyboards wouldn't work for clean rooms where they prepare sterile drugs, chemotherapy, certain IV's. It would be considered unclean as soon as it left the room. If it had any cracks or crevices, it would hold particulates in it that would contaminate the clean room when it was reintroduced into the room. If chemotherapy drugs got spilt on it, no one would know, and you'd be carrying that think around with you everywhere. If you had a permanent keyboard built into a hard surface it would be easy to clean and couldn't be contaminated easily.

  24. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    When shall we have a video in an Open Source format like .ogg?

    The beauty of Open Source is that you yourself are welcome to accomplish this feat any time you wish. You appear to have a computer, so you are most of the way there already, unless you cannot code and refuse to learn how, in which case you are part of the problem.

  25. Old problems made new by philippeqc · · Score: 1

    Keyboards and drinks have always been natural enemies. O yes, being able to whipe your desk IS going to be easier than to clean a keyboard, and I'll be thankfull JUST for that. But enemies they will stay.... I can just look forward to colleges placing their coffee mug on the reboot corner of my desk.

    -ph .. who was forced to clean tomato juice off a very dusty keyboard once!

  26. How to make a fortune by XorNand · · Score: 1
    1. Take an existing technology
    2. Adapt it for use in health care.
    3. Profit!

    Seriously, though... any would-be inventors would be wise to keep that in mind. If you think the Pentagon overpays for a toliet seat, wait to you see what a hospital spends on one.

    --
    Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    1. Re:How to make a fortune by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      1. Take an existing technology

      2. Adapt it for use in health care.

      3. Profit!


      s/health care/pornography and you have a winner

    2. Re:How to make a fortune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      s/health care/pornography and you have a weiner
      Canada should take a sticky page from your book... free pornography for all!
  27. does the FCC know about this? by rogerborn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    good read, but . . .

    the basic problem with all touchpads, regardless of who makes them or how they are used,
    is that they can become a window for RF signals into your computer.

    for example, some people experience crazy cursors whenever someone uses a cell phone nearby,
    because the RF signal from the phone invades the trackpad.

    all this interesting article points up is really that trackpads are very easy to exploit for other
    purposes.

    i wonder just when someone will hack a way to get into someone's computer hard drive via the
    trackpad or wacom tablet.

    and why isn't there a notice/warning on all laptops about this weakness of the trackpads
    open to RF signals?

    does the FCC even know about this?

    or is it an urban legend?

    regards,
    roger born
    "sorry, no refunds."

  28. Does it work with... by Rastignac · · Score: 0

    ...the nurses ? ;)

    --
    -- Rastignac was here.
    1. Re:Does it work with... by Stefanwulf · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness - could I hook one of these up to my arm with wi-fi/bluetooth connection, and just have touch-sensitive areas of skin? Or would the internals motion/noise of a biolgical object cause too many problems for the sensors?

  29. Sounds like old tech to me by frequnkn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Roland patented and employed a suspiciously similar tech years ago for their V-Drum electronic percussion system. Perhaps Roland's patents only apply to musical instruments, but the concept of deriving placement and distance from piezo electric sensors is nothing new.

  30. Sorry, researchers, but...... by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 4, Informative

    Elo Touchsystems / Tyco already has a product out there that works exactly this way...and a myriad of patents. Acoustic Pulse Recognition: http://media.elotouch.com/pdfs/marcom/apr_wp.pdf

    It's a relatively new product but it's already way past the research stage and well into production.

    1. Re:Sorry, researchers, but...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EloTouch is not the only company on the market.
      Sensitive object (http://sensitive-object.com/SO_ENG/index.php) is already selling the 'clean' stiker keyboard in France.
      Some embedded solutions to create virtual buttons on walls for switching lights are on the way.

  31. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, according to you, an entity cannot be "low paid" and "clean."
    That is not what I said.
    please re-read my post.

    But I can assure you that when death is demanding a visit to your household, you will not think of the "cleanliness" you appear to crave.

    I refuse to die in a hospital. Hospitals are full of sick people, and a sizable majority that are admitted, die there. A significant percentage of those that die in hospital would have survived had they stayed at home.

    I eschew drugs unless as an absolute last resort, unlike so many Westerners these days who seem quite happy to self medicate with OTC concoctions at the least symptom and turn to the doctor for prescription medication to cure everything from a head-ache, insomnia, fatigue, and malaise to spoiled children, when usually all that is needed is a good diet, exercise, fresh air and hard work, and in the case of spoiled children, a firm hand.

  32. Besides QWERTY and hygiene? by Nefarious+Yawn · · Score: 1

    We already have tons and tons of keyboards and many ways of manifesting them (see the laser keyboard and membrane keyboard noted above). What about customizable interfaces? As an artist and quasi-musician I am particularly interested in being able to customize my sonar interface to be implemented across my desktop as a personally intuitive keyboard, canvas, whatever.

  33. Finally I can ... by trintrin · · Score: 1

    ... play FPS with my airsoft gun (using these and some perspex in from of the screen)

  34. So what happens... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2, Funny

    when someone bumps my desk?asldku o0q3ueoaufhaslkfhslr8yrlkZDBSKDfjg24kadj fopwea5 948a a;ljkfh ap085u;dIAsdl;h;oduY*()~#)98UWO;ERIUWE;LKJ W;ELRI EW DAMN IT!

  35. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As willing as he may be to do that, it may not be possible.

    I cannot watch this wmv due to codec issues. No 64 bit wmv codec for me.

    Go back to trolling, asshat

  36. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by vertinox · · Score: 1

    What is that I don't get is why not just publish the thing to Google or Youtube. Not only would that make it easier for everyone to view (except for those old folks who hate flash regardless of the fact it can be run on Win, OS X, and Linux without fighting over Divx, WMV, or Quicktime codecs), but it would also save them an arm and a leg with bandwidth costs.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  37. Oh, sure, link to a video! by epp_b · · Score: 1

    Now it's at...yes, yes...no, still 3KB a second.

  38. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by sshutt · · Score: 1

    And the majority of cleaners will clean around a computer, and not even move a keyboard to clean under never mind clean any part of it.
    I don't know why this is, but its either because they've been asked not to, its their policy or they're just too scared in case they break something.

    So like you said a flat desk is much easier, and it will actually get done

    --
    I love the smell of burning karma in the morning...
  39. Screw hospitals, what about espionage? by Zadaz · · Score: 1

    Seems like I could hide a gadget under a desk that could tell what you were writing on it. Or what keys you were pressing on a keyboard resting on it. Or what they're writing on the whiteboard on the shared wall.

    Of course I'd just use it so I could tell what my employees were IM-ing during the meetings, but my first thought was not cleaner keyboards.

  40. I'd say most of the posters here missed a point... by mmell · · Score: 1
    Anybody here ever use a machine with the "chicklet" style keys, or worse yet, a "membrane" style keyboard? Personally, I remember getting unhappy with my first TRS-80 within about two minutes, once I got my hands on that @!*#& keyboard! For hunt-'n'-peck'ers, This'll be just fine; but for those of us from the world of the ten-fingered (touch-typists), it'll be useless.

    Then again, it might be useful in certain niche applications - hospitals (as TFA suggests), shop floors (where most users aren't touch-typists and environmental conditions are less than optimal for computing equipment), quick access on the fly (the "Starbucks" example being cited elsewhere). All the same, I don't think I'll bother running out and getting one anytime soon!

  41. Pressure Sensetive? by skorch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It looks interesting, but I wonder if it can be pressure sensetive (i.e. can detect how hard one is pressing on the surface based on the vibrations). I'm thinking of the artistic applications for this as a way to replace expensive Wacom tablets that come in set sizes of just a few inches with a single product that can be set up to simulate a canvas of any size. But in order for that to be a practical replacement for most artists, it would need to be able to sense the force being applied to the surface (for lighter and darker shades or textures to be applied in the brushstrokes).

    I wonder if this would also then allow different tools such as actual paint-brushes (which I presume have a different acoustic profile than say, a stylus or a finger) to be used as different inputs to get different brushstrokes. I also wonder what the effective range of these tools could be, as in do they lose detail or accuracy outside a certain distance, or could they be placed at the four corners of a room to track footsteps? Lots of different applications I can think of, but the one most useful to me is the artistic tablet replacement. My keyboard works just fine, and my desk gets a bit too cluttered to want to devote its entirety to becoming a UI system (at least not all the time), but if this tool could be developed to replace the keyboard, mouse, and tablet all at once (and cost-effectively) then I think they could be on to something I'd defintely be interested in.

    1. Re:Pressure Sensetive? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      It looks interesting, but I wonder if it can be pressure sensetive

      Well, given it works by accoustic localization, the answer is probably 'no'.

    2. Re:Pressure Sensetive? by tjwhaynes · · Score: 1
      It looks interesting, but I wonder if it can be pressure sensetive

      Well, given it works by accoustic localization, the answer is probably 'no'.

      But it could be impact sensitive fairly easily. You might need to calibrate the surface to establish an even impact response across the entire area. This would be interesting for experimental musical implementations. You could switch instruments fairly easily too - I often practice piano on the edge of my desk and who hasn't dragged out the pencils and played out the drum solo to music? :-)

      Someone suggested pairing this up to a projector. You could project an image of a keyboard (QWERTY/Piano/whatever) or drum kit onto the surface as appropriate. The only weakness is that any sort of drag-like behaviour might prove tricky. Maybe if you had an active signal generator which you could cause your hand to reflect the signals in some fashion, such changes could be detected by the acoustic pickups. Yet another step on the road to the Minority Report style interfaces.

      Cheers,
      Toby Haynes

      --
      Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
    3. Re:Pressure Sensetive? by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      You could combine this with a stylus. Make a bluetooth pen with buttons and stuff, and then the pen could sense the pressure and the acoustic sensors could determine the position. Should still be a lot cheaper than current drawing tables, you could make them as large as you wanted without increasing the price.

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  42. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by matthew.coulson · · Score: 1

    After the cleaners visit our offices there's a good few hours of calls regarding broken keyboards/mice/monitors/PCs. Generally just cables pulled - but the state on LCDs after a being subjected to cleaning fluids designed for CRTs numerous times is not pretty. For that reason, they are banned from entering our lab.

    We've raised the issue, changed cleaning firms - all the same.

  43. Less practical applications by Whyte+Panther · · Score: 1

    Am I the only person who thought unbreakable DDR pad when I read this?

  44. TRON by iomanip · · Score: 1

    Sweet, now I can have a keyboard like the boss in TRON!!!!@!@! My childhood fantasies are slowly coming true. Now all I need is a room full of computers and hot girls. Oh wait, I read slashdot, guess I'll settle for the room full of computers.

  45. Woa, and Woa and Woa Again by JoeZ99 · · Score: 1

    Everything, since they made the typewriting machine is confined to a keyboard interface.
    The first thing I thought about when I saw this was "a wider keyboard", then "a cheaper keyboard", then "a smaller laptop".
    But WTF is a Keyboard???? Just some Human-Machine Interface they made two centuries ago!
    With this new concept, we can virtaully define the interface upon the needs of the soft that need to be run
    Do you realize??
    sigh

  46. Parent is the funniest post ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, and... "Imagine actual sex." I do, all the time. :)

  47. Main problem with this by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Main problem with this is fighting the noise. The limitation on areas and input devices has a positive effect of reducing noise.

    When garcon will close couple of your applications by serving your latte you will know.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  48. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  49. Interestingly enough by Shadyman · · Score: 1

    the surface of any 3D object

    Technically, Everything real is a 3d object, even a piece of tissue paper. You can round it down to having 0 depth, but if you stack 10,000 pieces of tissue paper on top of each other, you get a tangible, measurable thickness.

    Now, I'm not recommending using tissue paper for touchpads, I'm just pointing out the fact that everything in our domain of existence is 3d. Now, of course, objects on our computer screens, however 3d they may appear, are actually 2d, being made up of only by light. The computer screens themselves, of course, are 3d.

    1. Re:Interestingly enough by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      Oh, man, I popped into here to post that exact thing, less the tissues. I was having a hard time finding things around the office that are not 3D objects.

  50. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

    It's been my experience that cleaning people use the same dirty rag to clean your monitor that they just used to clean the last 10 dirty desks.

  51. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by Jorgandar · · Score: 1

    I didn't know it took much training to push a mop around. I better get trained the next time i decide to clean the house or i might do it wrong!

  52. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they are only allowed to come out once the get better.

  53. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by bogado · · Score: 1

    So, according to you, an entity cannot be "low paid" and "clean."
    That is not what I said.
    please re-read my post.
     
      But I can assure you that when death is demanding a visit to your household, you will not think of the "cleanliness" you appear to crave.
     
    I refuse to die in a hospital. Hospitals are full of sick people, and a sizable majority that are admitted, die there. A significant percentage of those that die in hospital would have survived had they stayed at home.
      While I don't know if this statement is true or not, however the question you should be asking is how many people died at home that would not have died if they were in a hospital.
    I eschew drugs unless as an absolute last resort, unlike so many Westerners these days who seem quite happy to self medicate with OTC concoctions at the least symptom and turn to the doctor for prescription medication to cure everything from a head-ache, insomnia, fatigue, and malaise to spoiled children, when usually all that is needed is a good diet, exercise, fresh air and hard work, and in the case of spoiled children, a firm hand.On this I agree with you. :-)

    --
    []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

    ^[:wq

  54. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by binarybum · · Score: 1

    yeah, I guess the idea is that it's easier to sterilize a flat desk surface than a traditional keyboard. However, I avoid touching keyboards/mice in hospital / public situations as much as possible, but I might be more likely to mistakenly put my donut right on a surface that is actually someone's acoustic keyboard area. Furthermore, if hospitals really were interested in keeping keyboards sterile, there certainly have been ways to go about this (think 2second bleach rag wipedown of your speak n' spell keyboard after your kid sister puked on it) but apparantly very little marketable interest in it - not sure why they would choose to grab up this technology over any other.

    --
    ôó
  55. Did anyone else notice... by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    The first two shapes drawn in the video begin with a distinct rap to the geometric centre of the surface. In fact, there are markings on the surface showing where the centre is. (The last two shapes aren't shown from the very beginning).

    It could be that the system has a harder time distinguishing the start of a stroke than it does staying "locked on" during a stroke. Once it's locked on, possible signals that are very close to the last known position could be weighted much higher than signals arising just anywhere on the surface. That might even be why they are starting in the centre. Perhaps the system has a poor signal/noise ratio and doesn't reliably detect randomly located starts. Poor signal/noise ratio would also explain why they are rapping the surface distictly at the start.

    It's a very cool demonstration but I'm suspicious they are cheating a bit here.

  56. Hardly New by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    Back in the days of DOS/WfW3.11 there were ultrasonic digitizers which used transducers to make 2D and 3D digitizers of very good accuracy for CAD/CAM work.

    Already been done, already been on the market, and I even think the basics of the technology were covered in Byte back in the day.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  57. Other way round - touch pad to 3D by islisis · · Score: 1

    I would be more interested in technology that can add quasi-3D tactile sense to a touch display. I have been using resistive touch screens with my fingertips for a long time I truly believe that they are more intuitive (eye candyish buttons that you can press are just irresistable) and more practical especially in cramped spaces. For the market to try this of course it would miracle of course, and I think that is in the form of tactile feedback to assure them what their fingers are actually touching... At the moment there is too much potential confusion as to how much pressure is needed, where the cursors is under the mass of fleshed pressed against the screen etc..

    I could conceive of two ways this could be achieved, passive where the whole screen receives a vibration based on movement (essentially how tactile mice work), and active where a grid of buzzers paint the landscape.

    I don't see how holograms are ever going to turn holodecks in the foreseeable future so I do think touch displays are an important platform to develop.

  58. Repetitive Strain Injury by strange_dilemma · · Score: 1

    Hopefully the acoustic sensors can also pick up my screams of agony as I bash away on my hard-as-nails desktop, inducing even more swelling and pain without the benefit of the bio-feedback keys can give. Perhaps there could be a 'strain gauge' projected on the desk or even clicks related to the pressure used to hit the keys. Yes you should be able to mute this, but just think of the fun you would have if you linked this into a midi device. All those times you've drummed your fingers with boredom - now you could entertain everyone by tapping out Rachmaninov on your lap at the bus stop. Hang on I've hit on a solution, just project the keyboard on your thighs - instant bio-feedback and perfect keyboard posture!

  59. okay, how long before I get... by GentlemanRogue · · Score: 1

    my Minority Report-style desktop UI?

    Seriously, this could bode well for the whole idea of integrating the physical interface with the virtual system, as it's a very adaptable, less constrained design. Sorting objects (files) by physically moving them, zooming in by tapping on an object, sculpting/3D design by actually manipulating a physical object... and I haven't even touched on (no pun intended) the potential porn aspects... the mind boggles...

    --
    you really expect me to be able to express my opinion of what's so fucked up in this world in 120 characters or less?
  60. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    "The source of germs in hospitals is SICK PEOPLE. Come on folks, how long are we going to let these sickos with their sniffles and oozing infections dirty up our hospitals ?"

    The insurance companies are right on that. Pretty soon, only healthy people will be able to get insurance, QED no sickos in hospitals. Problem solved.

    (But I don't like to be original, if the original post was dead on. Thanks, posting master control program!)

  61. Re:And this contributes to cleaner hospitals how ? by sakasune · · Score: 1

    But when was the last time you saw a /. editor willing to validate, proofread, or desensationalize a story let alone contact someone, ask for permission, download, transcode, and host a video? Back to never again. :)

    Don't forget check for dupes

    --
    "You're arguing for a universe with fewer waffles in it," I said. "I'm prepared to call that cowardice."