Slashdot Mirror


Supreme Court to Rule On 'Obvious' Patents

vocaro writes "The U.S. Supreme Court appears ready to rewrite the standard of what makes a patent 'obvious.' In a case before the court, brake manufacturer Teleflex is accusing a rival, KSR International, of violating its patent on a brake assembly. Large patent holders, including Microsoft, IBM, and Cisco, have submitted briefs supporting KSR, saying that true innovators can have a patent held up against them that reflects nothing more than an obvious combination of preexisting elements, then be told they have to leave the market or pay royalties. The court appears to be on KSR's side, saying that Teleflex's invention would have been obvious to an individual of reasonable skill. During oral arguments, Justice Breyer observed, 'It looks to me at about the same level as I have a sensor on my garage door at the lower hinge ... and the raccoons are eating it. So I think of the brainstorm of putting it on the upper hinge.'"

2 of 239 comments (clear)

  1. not quite... by coolgeek · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    "So I think of the brainstorm of putting it on the upper hinge."

    Except in her example, her design choices would no doubt result in tons of product liability for her company, when the sensors fail to stop the garage door from closing on a child.

    --

    cat /dev/null >sig
  2. Re:Yeah for the raccoons by onemorechip · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And all this time I thought they were waiting for Lisa Kudrow.

    --
    But, I wanted socialized health insurance!