NVidia, AMD Subpoenaed In Antitrust Investigation
mustardayonnaise writes "CNN Money is reporting that graphics chipmakers Nvidia and AMD (who recently acquired NVidia rival ATI) said Friday that they received subpoenas from the US Department of Justice as part of a probe into potential antitrust violations involving graphics processing units and cards. Each company controls about 25% of the entire graphics chip market. According to the article, Intel, who makes their own fair share of graphics chipsets, has yet to be included in the investigation."
well, if this is happening, why isn't intel/amd being questioned about their control over pc chips?
Why UNIX?
CNN Money is reporting that graphics chipmakers Nvidia and AMD (who recently acquired NVidia rival ATI) said Friday that they received subpoenas from the US Department of Justice as part of a probe into potential antitrust violations involving graphics processing units and cards. Each company controls about 25% of the entire graphics chip market.
Meanwhile, the RIAA, who has a stranglehold over the music industry, gets to drive their truckloads of money straight to the bank.
The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
My guess would be that the cost to develop working drivers would outweigh the profits that they would see from increased Linux user base. By the conspiracy idea is a good one too ;)
Ah, so the DOJ is perfectly happy with multibillion-dollar competition-free contracts for "rebuilding Iraq" and blatantly monopolistic behavior by telecom providers, they think allowing Microsoft to racketeer OEMs into forcing customers to buy Windows with every machine they sell is absolutely fine, and of course they won't even dare to think about prosecuting other branches of their own government for numerous violations of the Constitution and war crimes, but when two companies, by persistently competing with each other and achieving near-perfect parity for long periods of time, create one of the most staggeringly cutthroat markets on the planet, they must of course be investigated.
Good job, DOJ!
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
I don't get it...what is the DOJ's angle here? There is real competition in the graphics card market, more so then the processor market and definately more then say...the operating system market.
Why are they going after these guys anyway?
I would think that being aware of a subpoena referring to anti-trust litigation is well within the the responsibilities of a PR dept. of a large corporation.
I think there's great competition and I doubt any sort of fixing of price has been happening. One has to wonder the motivation behind this. Why are they spending our tax dollars when it is obvious that we have great competition, lots of manufacturers, great prices, lots of power, enormous competition with integrated chipsets, etc.
Any word on why this is happening or are we just funding some Justice Dept's employee's rise to celebrity?
You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
I know... it's sarcasm, but you didn't mark it up that way specifically.
But these kind of situations are most likely built on patents (licensing, trading, whatever) as a means to lock out competitors. This is obviously not what the patent system is supposed to be used for.
I'm certain there are a multitude of patents related to the implementation of OpenGL, for example. It would be my guess that the costs for implementing cards that would otherwise violate these patents would cost more than they could sell them for per unit. To me, that would spell "new-comers not welcome." Is that Antitrust? I don't know... that's for the judges to decide. But from where I sit, this is yet another shining example of how patents damage industries more than they help.
It doesn't seem logical anyhow. Sure, there may be only two high capability options, but that doesn't make them monopolies. Besides, there AREW a few other companies out there... Intel doesn't have the other 50%. So, you have at least THREE major corporate players, all within a factor of two of each other marketshare-wise, plus third (fourth?) parties. Intel might not really directly compete with NVidia, but ATI has had and continues to have integrated solutions for laptops, at least. I've tried one; it's not bad, though not as powerful as a standalone card. So, overall I think we have a healthy, active community of companies all competing like hell to give the best customer experience, in a cutthroat and fast-moving industry, without actually cutting any throats. This needs an antitrust probe WHY?!?
There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...