Slashdot Mirror


Designer Glasses With Microdisplay Unveiled

An anonymous reader writes to tell us about an Israeli company, Lumus-Optical, and their nicely designed eyeglasses featuring twin microdisplays and mini projectors. They will be demoed at CES in January. From the article: "The firm's latest prototype boasts dual 640 x 480 resolution displays as well as two wee projectors on each arm; the Lumus glasses can accept video inputs via an undisclosed connection, and projects an image akin to a '60-inch screen from 10 feet away.' Its Light-guide Optical Element technology allows the imagery to be reflected back on to the lenses so users can view them, all while being transparent enough to allow you to focus on the humans, trees, road block, or board room presentation ahead of you."

30 of 161 comments (clear)

  1. The goggles... by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...they do something!

  2. Finally, by rednip · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A way to watch porn 'in public' without being hassled by 'the man'. Better yet, can you imagine driving at 75 mph while your favorite 'artist' performs her special talent. Seriously, we'll look back to the 'good old days' when people were just distracted by their cell phones, and not email, porn, and shopping. Hopefully cars will drive themselves before 'Joe SUV' gets his hands on 'this'.

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    1. Re:Finally, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      A way to watch porn 'in public' without being hassled by 'the man'.
      Ah, to be young again...

      When you grow other, you'll be hassled by "the woman" when you watch porn...
    2. Re:Finally, by mandelbr0t · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I never said I couldn't afford it. I just said they are a waste of money given the lack of stress and general efficiency of public transit. Of course, I can understand that the brainwashed masses might have an emotional attachment to their vehicles which they have worked Oh So Hard to pay for. Enlightenment is difficult to acheive, n00b.

      mandelbr0t

      --
      "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
    3. Re:Finally, by drsquare · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Personally, I'd rather spend 45 minutes of stress-free commuting playing with some techno gizmo than worrying about paying for and maintaining an SUV.

      Public transport is stress free? So what of:
      1. Standing in the rain for an hour waiting to see if it turns up
      2. Being thrown off because you don't have the right change
      3. Sitting amongst unruly, foul-mouthed kids
      4. Your shopping spilling all over the floor
      5. Getting there late
      6. Only being able to travel at certain hours
      7. Having to walk several miles to and from each bus stop
      counts as stress free?

      My journey to work is ten minutes in the car door to door. With public transport, well over an hour. Well that was until they cancelled the route, now it's infinity time.
    4. Re:Finally, by McTaggart · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just maybe the public transport where he is is better than where you are?

      1. Never had a bus not turn up
      2. Never had a bus driver not break a note for me (although I've never tried to buy a $1.30 fair with a fifty)
      3. Depends on the time, mornings and evenings, none. 3 in the afternoon it's still better than the unruly foul mouthed drivers that clog up the streets around where I live (I live near two schools)
      4. Bags are awesome
      5. I've only ever been late when it was my fault (ie, missing the bus)
      7. Nearest bus stop to me is about 100m away, though that bus only comes ever hour. Next nearest maybe 300m which two bus routes go past (both from the same train station) which effectively runs every 20 minutes.

      My journey to uni on the busses and trains is maybe 45 minutes, by car well over an hour through heavily congested freeways.

    5. Re:Finally, by Simon80 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You clearly just have money to burn.

    6. Re:Finally, by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You forgot:

      6. There is no #6!

  3. Invest in Insurance Stocks! by wiz31337 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yet another way for people to get into car accidents, fall down stairs, and walk into poles!

    --
    /whisper/ Thanks for the candy!
  4. Augmented Reality by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Lets get some higher resolution in these things and start doing some augmented reality! I can finally store a face next to a name, recall it in a subtle form through my glasses, and never have an awkward moment at a cocktail party every again!

    --
    There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    1. Re:Augmented Reality by Das+Modell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You could do a lot of neat stuff with those glasses if they had Internet connectivity and the right software. An overlayed GPS map should be easy enough. It could even three-dimensionally show your destination as an icon, and your distance to it.

      Artificial eyes and a computerized brain would be more handy, though.

    2. Re:Augmented Reality by RealErmine · · Score: 4, Funny

      never have an awkward moment at a cocktail party every again!

      How about "Look at the stupid glasses that guy's wearing!"

      --
      Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
    3. Re:Augmented Reality by IdleTime · · Score: 3, Funny

      I need glasses that give me an image similar to watching a 23" from an armlength's distance

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    4. Re:Augmented Reality by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Informative
      For general purpose use, however (say I wanted to watch a movie on my glasses on the bus on the way home, or look at pr0n or something), 640x480 is still lacking in it's ability to show detail.


      640x480 resolution is exactly enough to show a standard size and aspect ratio 480i/p TV picture; it'll be the equivalent of 480pX where X is whatever its refresh rate is, at 60Hz, it'll do DVD-quality playback (either at 480i60 or 480p24/30) and better (480p60).

      Admittedly, its not enough to show HD content.

    5. Re:Augmented Reality by Virtual_Raider · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You beat me to the GPS example =) But I thought of a couple more... I recently bought some bluetooth stereo earphones to listen to mp3s on my mobile. Imagine if you could also conect this 'designer glasses' to a cell phone and be able to read your sms =)

      It would be really neat to have the small envelope icon pop up in a corner of your vision as another mean of informing you. Of course, this is not for everybody and I'm already anticipating the reaction of the I-don't-want-that-therefore-it-sucks crowd. It would also take some good design to make it so that it doesn't block your field of vision, I wouldn't want to be driving in the middle of a busy road and have a giant sms envelope popping right in front of my eyes. Yet, done well it would absolutely kick ass.

      Since I'm day-dreaming, how about coupling that with those keyboards made of light ala Final Fantasy Movie that came out for the Palm. You could see the keyboard in your glasses and type in thin air a reply. And don't forget a cyberpunk favorite, the digital watch.

      The future in the mirror is closer than it appears.

      --
      +Raider of the lost BBS
  5. Gadget Makers: get some fashion sense by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How freakin' dorky do those "designer" glasses look? What's so hard here, integrate your displays into a normal looking pair of sunglasses and make them no more bulky while doing so. Yes, that means you are going to have to do something revolutionary and hide that revolutionary technology in something that looks normal. Cause that's what people want when they are out in public; to look like everyone else; and that's where this product will be used.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  6. why bother with a virtual 60" screen 10' away by mofag · · Score: 2, Funny

    when I can go buy a 60" widescreen plasma tv and sit 2 feet away from it?

  7. Re:heh by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative
    for those of you driving in motor vehicles equipped with media players and the proper output connections. and if so - why not a hud built into the wind shield?

    In order for a hud to be viewable on the windshield in daylight the windshield must be special, which translates into expensive. People lose windshields to rocks falling off of semis and the like every day. That is why this is a stupid idea.

    Note that the HUD in a military aircraft does not display on the canopy. It displays on a transparent screen in front of the pilot, such as in fighter jets, or on goggles, such as in the Apache assault heli.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Nice design, but is it functional? by Scothoser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a really nice design, but how does it function? Their website (www.lumus-optical.com) doesn't specify beyond potential application. Does it allow you to clip onto existing glasses, or do you have to use their display as well? It has a clean display in comparison to the My Vu specs (www.myvu.com), but there doesn't seem to be a lot more to it. Does it have built in audio, does it have a bulky adapter/controller? I for one would like to see more information on the website.

    Assuming these questions are answered to my satisfaction, I'd be happy to look into it in conjunction with a decent video playing PDA/cell phone. Integrate the bluetooth keyboard, and you have a real mobile computer.

  9. Undisclosed? by grassy_knoll · · Score: 4, Funny
    Lumus glasses can accept video inputs via an undisclosed connection


    Undisclosed? What, does the input jack require lube or something?

    "...So you see, the electrical impulses are carried along the central nervous system then back out through the epidural layer near the magnet on the glasses... "

    "Look, I don't care how it works that is Not an entrance!"

    [badum-ching]
  10. Home page, earlier products by Victor+Fors · · Score: 4, Informative

    link to home page: http://www.lumusvision.com/ They have a technology section displaying an overview of the refraction elements used to display the image. They also seem to have developed (and brought to market) an earlier model of these glasses. I admit they do look shiny, but if i bought VR goggles i'd primarily use them at home. It's a cool toy, but would lug around something like that for everyday use?

  11. Nerd goggles by eclectro · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...they do something!

    Can I get a date by wearing the goggles? Or can I get a girl to date me by her wearing them? Or can I date the girl in the picture? How do they work exactly??

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  12. Dangers of extended use? by dave562 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What are the implications of using something like this on a regular basis? It's pretty well documented that people experience eye strain from staying focused at a fixed focal depth for too long (ie. when looking at a monitor). I've had my own vision deteriorate pretty significantly since I have started using computers despite genetics to the opposite (ie. my mom and dad both have great vision and they are in their late 50s). I shudder to think about the implications of remaining focused at a depth of less than inch from the eye for extended periods of time.

    1. Re:Dangers of extended use? by mpoulton · · Score: 4, Informative

      I shudder to think about the implications of remaining focused at a depth of less than inch from the eye for extended periods of time.

      You're not. The focal distance is much further away than that -- the apparent focal plane floats in front of the user at a comfortable distance. Thus, eye strain should be reduced compared to normal computer use.

      --
      I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
  13. Re:Huh? by MustardMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.bradleyrhodes.com/Papers/thad-glasses-h alf.jpg

    Thad Starner, formerly of MIT and now at Georgia Tech has been using a wearable computer with a display built into his glasses for YEARS. This is NOT a new idea. It wasn't a new idea a month ago when slashdot posted an article from another company doing the same thing, and it won't be a new idea a month from now when they post an article about ANOTHER company developing the same thing. Problem is, none of these things ever actually comes to market, so you get a bunch of people reinventing the wheel and no one actually mass producing it.

  14. Re:heh by 644bd346996 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "They" can. It would just be very expensive. Lexan, for example, is used in race cars.

  15. As if the bluetooth earphone wasn't dorky enough.. by broohaha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't wait to see people hanging out at the grocery store or at the local mall, just walking around with those hideously ugly glasses, completely oblivious to their surroundings and watching some tv show. I can see how it can be useful in some situations, but to the folks that I'm sure I'll see walking about in crowded shopping areas, I ask what the point of all that is, other than to simply show off?

  16. Re:heh by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 2, Informative

    In order for a hud to be viewable on the windshield in daylight the windshield must be special, which translates into expensive. People lose windshields to rocks falling off of semis and the like every day. That is why this is a stupid idea.

    It isn't really as bad as you make it out to be.

    The "specialness" is really just a coating to prevent double-reflections (one from the front of the glass and one from the back of the glass). You can purchase a user-applicable version of this coating yourself. Various cars already come with a HUD, like the Corvette which has had it as an option for probably over a decade now.

  17. Efficiency by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    general efficiency of public transit This would be the definition of efficiency whick leads a public transit journey to take 2 hours, 15 miles, a change of route and a 30 minute wait in the rain compared to a 20 minute, 5 mile warm, dry journey in relative comfort.

    Enlightenment is easy.

    --
    Deleted
  18. Wii Controller by TranscendentalAnarch · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was going to say that, at least with this type of display, you won't get any idiots chucking their Wii controllers at their 60" plasmas... But then I thought that, if you're stupid enough to do that, you'll be stupid enough to swing the nun chuck around and smack the crap out of your face and the glasses.