Slashdot Mirror


Vista Not Compatible With SQL Server

kiran_n sent in an article by Fortune's Owen Thomas on Vista not being compatible with SQL Server. An excerpt: "But now Microsoft has a problem. Vista, its long-awaited update to the Windows operating system, can't run the current version of SQL Server. The company is working on a SQL upgrade that is compatible with Vista — called SQL Server 2005 Express Service Pack 2 — but it's in beta and can be licensed only for testing purposes. Microsoft hasn't set a release date for the new SQL program."

10 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I can't help but wonder... by nullforce · · Score: 3, Informative

    SQL Server Developer Edition probably falls into this category, as well as SQL Server Express. Both of these might be expected to run on a workstation.

  2. Re:I can't help but wonder... by mgh02114 · · Score: 5, Informative
    people get what they deserve for running a Server application on a Desktop OS.


    With all due respect, RTFA:

    (Before any more of you fire off an outraged e-mail informing me that Vista doesn't run SQL Server, go back and read the above paragraphs again: I'm talking about SQL Server 2005 Express, which is the desktop counterpart of SQL Server - not the server version.)
  3. actually far worse by minus_273 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, not only does it not work with SQL 2005 but it doesnt work with SQL 2000 either. In fact if you try to install SQL 2000 on vista it will try to stop you with messages saying the software has been tested to be incompatible with Vista. MS has not gone on the record that SQL 2000 will NEVER work with Vista. They want everyone to upgrade to SQL 2005 and have no plans to fix SQL 2000. If anyone hasn't used SQL 2005, they have removed DTS packages and the replacement is so horribly broken that simple things like copying a table from one database to another does not work.

    Good thing there is windows server 2003 still.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  4. Re:Why? - For development. by ziani · · Score: 4, Informative

    You install the "Express" version (which is what the article is talking about) on a desktop/laptop for development purposes. For example, I'm developing a specialized information tracking application that is intended to run on my company's intranet. Our company is 100% MS shop, so we have to design for SQL Server as the back end. I'm using MS Visual Web Developer 2005 Express to create the ASP.Net "business logic" or "mddleware", and a web-based user interface. Visual Web Developer 2005 Express automatically installs SQL Server Express and integrates nicely.

    Just not on Vista, it appears.

  5. Re:I can't help but wonder... by Salvance · · Score: 4, Informative

    I lead the IT department of a small company, and we use SQL Server Express on desktops all the time. Our clients use it as well, since almost all of them are far too small to own a real server (e.g. restaurants, doctors offices, etc.). We ran into this last week when we installed Vista for the first time to see what would happen. Needless to say, we were rather shocked when none of our internally developed apps would work. VERY annoying.

    --
    Crack - Free with every butt and set of boobs
  6. Re:FUD at its best by thona · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your post?

    Bet on. One of the most idiotic ever.

    See: ::"SQL Server" (suggesting its full fledged version) was NEVER compatible with Vista, ::or XP for that matter. It's meant for servers, not desktops.

    Wrong, it was compatible. It is not meant to be used on that - on a poroduction environment, but it is compatible, and a good reason to install it on XP is development. Like having a SQL Server avaialble on your laptop. ::Second, Vista is NOT RELEASED YET.

    Bullshit. Serious. Vista was RTM what - three weeks ago? It is even avaialble in a boxed vervion in shops already in limited distribution (i.e. in SOME shops, wide availability is in january). Companies / developers have download access ot the gold/rtm master code for weeks - like my company is rolling out Vista business between christmas and new year on all desktops, and is inthe middle of testing that.

    Check your facts. Idiotic statements like yours make open source look bad.

  7. Just for clarification by Espectr0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is about the desktop version (SQL Server Express). Companies don't run that, so this isn't much of a big deal. The regular SQL Server works fine.

  8. Re:I can't help but wonder... by nullforce · · Score: 4, Informative

    I believe Management Studio Express allows you to display a query plan, which is also a free product.

  9. Re:I can't help but wonder... by Luscious868 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The integration with Visual Studio makes it far and away the best DB to use to develop data driven applications and it's a breeze to upgrade your applications and their databases to SQL Server if you need to make the move. If you've got to use MS, there's no better way to go.

  10. Re:I can't help but wonder... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's the same as usual with MS platform. If you decide to go that way, then you're best off going all the way in. Win2003, VS2005, ASP.NET, IIS, MS SQL Server - you'll get more out of those combined than you would have by using them separately.