Slashdot Mirror


Revisiting the Physics of Buckaroo Banzai

serutan writes "Shortly before the release of 'The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai: Across the 8th Dimension' in 1984, physicist Carl Sneider of U.C. Berkeley wrote a surprisingly interesting essay on the physics behind the movie. Since the essay is not widely available on the web and I could only find it in plain text, I posted a more readable HTML version on my site. Among the more interesting points Sneider makes are that the oscillation overthruster is the result of decades of research instead of the usual laboratory accident, and its development corresponds surprisingly well with the evolution of particle physics from the 1930s to the 80s."

40 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. Weird science by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Consider this, if you were to disrupt the particle behavior of an object so that its molecular bonds were permeable (since they are mostly made of space in the first place), you'd end up with the particle either collapsing on itself or blown to bits due to repulsive charges of neigbor particles. So Banzai wouldn't be able to fly through a mountain because the mountain would have collapsed upon itself. If he used the oscillator on himself and his ship, he wouldn't be able to recover from the damage.

    There's no doubt a lot of fun speculation to be made here, but if you're going to get your science from the web, it's best to stay away from Slashdot.

    1. Re:Weird science by IdahoEv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the other hand, not knowing much about particle physics, I had always assumed that the "science" in Buckaroo Banzai was just so much vapid technobabble.

      The fact that phrases like "intermediate vector bosons" tossed around in the movie actually have a connection of any sort at all to the issues being discussed puts BB already a few parsecs ahead of the typical S.F. junk that hollywood puts out.

      I'd always thought of BB as a camp fantasy classic. It's refreshing to know that the writers actually knew a little science and applied it, even if the final product was entirely improbable.

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    2. Re:Weird science by serutan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bear in mind that the article was written in the spirit of making the movie more enjoyable for people who are geeky enough to understand something about particle physics. The point was not to prove the feasibility of the oscillation overthruster, but to show that the science thread that runs through Buckaroo Banzai is a cut above standard movie technobabble. Sneider sort of addressed the mountain-collapsing issue by mentioning that the area of effect was small and short-lived, which is why the jet car had to travel 700 mph to keep up with it. It's all in fun.

    3. Re:Weird science by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Funny


      All the I know, is that The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai (Across the Seventh Dimension), was the worst thing that I ever ever got in charades once. My sister got Jaws!

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    4. Re:Weird science by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Interesting
      For what it's worth, if you like it, it's pretty much a direct lift from the classic Doc Savage, "Man of Bronze" pulps of the 30s and 40s. They weren't camp at the time, just from a different era, both in terms of literature and science. This was before physics was considered a major branch of science, so much of the wizz-bang new inventions are through the modern miracle of cutting edge chemistry. The characters were painted in bright, broad strokes, just like Buckaroo's sidekicks. One even carries around a long eared pig. Ethnic stereotypes and slurs weren't considered politically incorrect, and women had only had the ability to vote for ten years, so you have to take some things with an understanding of the era (i.e., if you're offended by such things, don't read 'em).


      Fun stuff, and highly recommended if you really like Science Fiction, as you can see where much of it came from. The Philip José Farmer take on the characters later in the century is a different beast (enjoyable, but not what we're talking about). Things like ice bullets and enzymes are the high tech weapons, plus a little dabbling in the (even at the time) classics of SF like hollow world theory. (There was an official Doc Savage movie that was done to be camp and sucked monkey balls).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    5. Re:Weird science by hal2814 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "The point was not to prove the feasibility of the oscillation overthruster, but to show that the science thread that runs through Buckaroo Banzai is a cut above standard movie technobabble."

      Right. It's basically an inside joke. Most people think Buckaroo might as well be reversing the polarity of the neutron flow but a few people out there are really going to appreciate the effort put forth in creating the technobabblish scenes. And this sort of inside joke is a lot harder to pull off than throwing Gil Garrard's name into a Family guy episode.

    6. Re:Weird science by mbourgon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed on the Doc Savage reference. Buckaroo is an updated version of the old pulps - and the novelization of the movie (written by the script writer) is written like a pulp, complete with references to other adventures. FWIW, Evan, someone took the old movie and replaced the "songs" with the original (instrumental) John Philips Sousa tunes, and it makes the movie MUCH more watchable. Still not great, but it holds up a whole lot better this way than I would've imagined.

      Here's hoping that Raimi does wind up doing Doc (he recently got the rights to do movies based off of Street & Smith characters).

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    7. Re:Weird science by azuravian · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seems like that would have been hard in charades. Especially since you're trying to get people to guess a movie that doesn't even exist.

    8. Re:Weird science by paiute · · Score: 2, Informative

      Consider this, if you were to disrupt the particle behavior of an object so that its molecular bonds were permeable (since they are mostly made of space in the first place), you'd end up with the particle either collapsing on itself or blown to bits due to repulsive charges of neigbor particles. So Banzai wouldn't be able to fly through a mountain because the mountain would have collapsed upon itself. If he used the oscillator on himself and his ship, he wouldn't be able to recover from the damage.

      Going through matter like that is not a question of altering material behaviour in our three or four dimensions but taking advantage of other dimensions, up to the eighth. Buckaroo just used the next fifth through eighth dimension to make him and his car orthoganol to the first three or four dimensions.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    9. Re:Weird science by mengel · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Actually, as long as you did it for a really short period of time, the main effects would be:
      • particles would fall due to gravity (unless this effect also weakened gravity, but current theory wouldn't support that). But it would take a signifigant portion of a second for the particles to move much due to gravity.
      • particles vibrating due to brownean motion would possibly continue past each other possibly rearranging crystaline structures
      Once you turned the field back off, the forces between the atoms would reappear, and most of the molecules would snap back into place.

      If you left the field on a long time, yes you would possibly get a tunnel, as the particles would fall to the bottom of the region at which point their fields would turn back on, and there would possibly be... fusion? an explosion?

      Disclaimer: I am not a particle physicist, but I do talk with them in the cafeteria...

      --
      - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
    10. Re:Weird science by steveha · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you enjoy pulp adventures, I highly recommend Aaron Allston's "Doc Sidhe" books. Sadly there are only two so far, but I'm eager for more. The first one is available completely free from the Baen Free Library:

      http://www.baen.com/library/aallston.htm

      Enjoy!

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    11. Re:Weird science by aiabx · · Score: 2, Funny

      No wonder it was hard. You were confusing everyone with the wrong number of dimensions.

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
  2. Cool car mod by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one would love an oscilating overthruster on my car, it would enable me to drive through traffic jams. My only consern is that if I can pass through solid matter what is to stop me passing throught the crust of the earth? I drive a MR2 Roadster and I don't think the canvas soft top is rated to magma.

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
    1. Re:Cool car mod by MaGogue · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you project your intermediate vector bosons accurately, you'll obtain a tunnel through the mountain with solid floor just below the wheels, and a collapsing yet transparent core in front.
      Move fast enough, and banzai!, you tunnel through.
      It is interesting to note that 'electron tunneling' is an actual term used in quantum physics.

      Only make sure you don't use up your batteries too soon.

  3. I dunno by deft · · Score: 2, Funny

    On slashdot sure I see some morons, but there's usually some people on here so smart I don't understand a thing they said to smack down the moron, and somehow I say that's expertise.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    1. Re:I dunno by Minwee · · Score: 3, Funny

      I believe that that's one of Clarke's Laws. Any sufficiently advanced technobabble is indistinguishable from smack.

    2. Re:I dunno by somersault · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mod parent diagonal.

      Now excuse me while I go phlib my enjuntificator.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  4. Just remember by stox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "No matter where you go, there you are!"

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  5. This was already discussed by Londo Molari by rogerborn · · Score: 3, Informative


    He discussed it a long time ago in the far off, but rather close future.

    Here is the link -

    http://www.rogerborn.com/commentary/a-walk-among-t he-atoms.html

    ""These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others."

  6. Re:The Usual Accident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's the point of the article! It's saying that the movie more reasonably potrays advances as the result of protracted endeavour rather than the usual for movies laboratory accident. Next time read more carefully.

  7. Buck-A-Roo! by beezly · · Score: 3, Funny

    Curse that headline. I thought this was going to be an article about the inner workings of some extreme version of Buckaroo!.

    I was so disappointed when I found out it was about a sci-fi film.

    Buck-A-Rooooo!

  8. Re:Buckaroo Banzai was easy to identify with by KORfan · · Score: 2, Funny

    He had it easy. Back when I was a musician/physicist/adventurer/crime-fighter, we built our own instruments and our cars were crank starters. We didn't have any of this automatic transmission nonsense, and we reloaded our own bullets, too! This guy would have to struggle to make his own vacuum tubes.

  9. He got to see the director's cut! by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 2, Informative
    "The machine which finally enables Buckaroo Banzai to move through matter is based on decades of research that are shown to the audience through home movies and flashbacks."

    Dr. Sneider must have seen an early edit of the film in 1984. The home movie segment wasn't widely available until the recent DVD release.

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
  10. Lesson to be learned by Lord+Grey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not only did Buckaroo's car go wicked fast -- so fast that the on-board camera shook alarmingly -- and was able to drive through a mountain, it had turn signals . And Buckaroo used them . This Half Japanese/Rockstar/Neuro-Surgeon/Particle Physicist/Adventurer sets a good example for all of us!

    --
    // Beyond Here Lie Dragons
    1. Re:Lesson to be learned by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Not only did Buckaroo's car go wicked fast

      Yeah, but one heat-seeking missile and he's *history*.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  11. Copyright? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Doesn't the original writer have copyright over this essay? Is it legal for it to be posted to the web without his authority? I know we don't care so much about copyright on /., but this is a bit rediculous.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  12. Re:Thanks, guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just watched it recently, too. I like that end credits music. I'd like to have that as my ring-tone.

    This is one of my all time favorite movies. Stylist wardrobe, excellent cast, fun characters, campy but a true classic.

  13. I don't think it would work inside an atmosphere by SirGarlon · · Score: 2, Informative
    From the article:
    The basic premise of the Overthruster seems perfectly reasonable if we could just find a way to do this. How could we shorten the distance that virtual photons travel within the atom? Since virtual photons have no mass, they are able to travel the full distance between electrons and protons. What would happen if the virtual photons were given mass? If virtual photons had mass, they would be restricted to a very small region around the elementary particles that make up the atoms.

    Fair enough, but what would be the implications for the object that gets its virtual photons recombobulated this way?

    First thing that comes to mind is that all matter, not just Banzai's rocket car, could move through the target (the mountain in this case). So, the surrounding air would rush into the newly created "empty space" that coincides with the mountain. This would cause a tremendous thunderclap and lots of turbulence. Since the molecules inside the mountain are no longer really solid, they'd get displaced by the inrushing air and spewed all over the place.

    Inside an atmosphere, the Oscillation Overthruster would basically be a disintegrator ray.

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  14. Re:Important questions by MrPlastic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Though the movie answers with, "Er...I'll tell you later," ISTR that Earl Mac Rauch has said that the watermelon in the vise was part of a program under development at the Banzai Institute to create food that could be air-dropped into a famine area without parachutes or other special equipment: any bush pilot could fly over and drop a load of watermelons, and the starving masses would rejoice, needing only a sharp knife to get through the tough, drop-rated skin. (This idea is somewhat reminiscent of the water spheres in the classic short story "Arena," by Frederic Brown, which are unbreakably held together with increased surface tension until something sharp releases the water.)

  15. Big Trouble in Little China by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 2, Interesting
    http://imdb.com/title/tt0086856/trivia

    # The end of the movie invites the viewer to watch for the upcoming film "Buckaroo Banzai vs. The World Crime League". This was the real title for a sequel that Sherwood Studios planned to make if this film had been successful. Unfortunately, it was a box-office bomb, and Sherwood Studios went bankrupt. After its release on video and cable, however, BB became a cult favorite, much in the same way as Mad Max (1979) (which crawled from obscurity to spawn two sequels). Legal wranglings due to the bankruptcy prevented any other studios from picking up the sequel rights, and even years later MGM had to fight through a pile of red tape simply to get the OK to release it on DVD.
    # The script for the proposed sequel Buckaroo Banzai vs. The World Crime League ended up becoming the script for John Carpenter's Big Trouble in Little China (1986).
    Since I read this I can't watch BTiLC without thinking of Buckaroo and crew going deep under Chinatown.
    Jonah HEX
    1. Re:Big Trouble in Little China by silentounce · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The script for the proposed sequel Buckaroo Banzai vs. The World Crime League ended up becoming the script for John Carpenter's Big Trouble in Little China (1986)."

      That's false. I recently had the pleasure to view the recent DVD release of BTiLC. One of the special features discusses how the film was developed. There is no mention of BB in there. In fact, the original script was set in the Old West. My memory is vague. But I'm fairly sure that the trivia from IMDB is BS.

      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
    2. Re:Big Trouble in Little China by silentounce · · Score: 2, Informative

      I should have looked in the wiki before I posted that.
       
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Trouble_in_Litt le_China#Production_History
      http://en.wikipedia.o rg/wiki/The_Adventures_of_Buckaroo_Banzai_Across_t he_8th_Dimension#Sequels
       
      Both of those explain what I tried to say much more clearly.

      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
  16. Re:Atoms are mostly empty? by SirGarlon · · Score: 2, Informative
    That an atom really isn't mostly empty space, but that 'space' is full of the wave functions of the electrons in 'orbit' of the nucleus?
    Yes and no. I am too lazy to go look it up in my quantum textbook (it's been more than a decade since I graduated) but I remember being surprised to find that, when you actually integrate the wave function, you still come out with a high probability of a particle being localized to a fairly small area in space. That is, in principle the wave function extends through the entire universe but most of its moment is within an angstrom or two (waving my hands here, too lazy to re-read-up on the math) of where a classical "orbiting marble" model of the atom says it would be.
    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  17. Re:before physics was ... by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It really was science with no practical applications then. The sad thing is just as WWI was the fought with chemistry war WWII was the war fought with physics.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  18. Alignment solves everything by mattr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm quite worried a lot of people will get the wrong idea about this movie, that it's all impossible. Of course the overthruster isn't disintegrating the matter on which it is focused, it is simply enabling a bidirectionally permeable interface to form naturally between two space harmonics.

    It has been long known that spacetime has a granular quality, in fact when you get small enough everything is spin networks (you can learn more about it on Wikipedia) which can basically be thought of as a quantum of space. in other words we are all just living on particles strung on lattices (see lattice theory). But since the granularity of spacetime is at a resolution of Planck units, there is obviously an infinity of other universes that can exist between the lines as it were, made of particles strung along a lattice just out of step with our own. If you can gauge the distances correctly along this string-net and apply a constant field to shift the center of gravity of space quanta a little to one side and perfectly coincide with the spin networks on a different lattice, then voila! you can continue motion over that other dimension, which is only confusing because we use the word dimension when clearly it is simply a spacetime superimposed on our own but with a topology ordered along a geometry that is slightly out of step with ours.

    This duality over the lattice may seem difficult to stomach but it will be invariably clear to anyone who has gotten used to the television version's compression of the entire x-axis into the tube's smaller aspect ratio (the ultra-cool credits scene). That, and if you can believe a key researcher is named Joan Baez.

    This is what the movie is trying to illustrate when the Buckaroo's nemesis gets himself stuck halfway through a wall. That probably happened partly because they were using an inefficient energy carrier (as TFA suggests), bosons not being known in the 30s, but mostly in fact due to insufficient speed, since if you lose momentum while in the interface you would have to push against quite a lot of knots in the spin network to extricate yourself. It is a kind of rigged Hilbert space, with the knots rigged along the lattices like a ship's rigging, and it is all so intertwined you really have to push with a lot of oomph.

    Hence the 700 miles per hour rocket. Obviously the characters are pushing through onto another lattice and not disintegrating the matter in front of them, because if they were destroying matter not only would things probably get quite hot, but also gravity would drag down the nose of Buckaroo's craft toward the center of the Earth! And that doesn't happen at all in fact.

    We shall soon see how well the movie predicts reality with the next generation of particle accelerators. TFA only makes one terrible mistake, in that they suggest the movie is wrong about magnitudes because Buckaroo is superhumanly able to miniaturize accelerators. In fact just recently research scientist Anatoly Maksimchuk and Donald Umstadter, and another team in Europe, have been able to focus high energies with table-top devices. Certainly as higher energies are reached there will be a manifold of possibilities to study. Just remember, wherever you go, there you are.

  19. Blatant pitch by deblau · · Score: 2, Informative

    The oscillation overthruster was incorporated into BZFlag, a tank-based FPS. It lets your tank 'walk through walls' and lay in wait inside buildings where you can't be shot by normal bullets. For the record, I'm an admin on a few servers, and I play regularly. Oh yeah, the game runs on Linux, BSD, Irix (where I first encountered it), and Windows of course.

    --
    This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  20. Re:before physics was ... by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually WWII was fought with Quantum Physics.

    WWIII is being fought with the media.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  21. Re:before physics was ... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Argh, the limits of textual communication. Einstein made a huge splash in the scientific community in 1905. My point was that the GGP was incorrect, physics was a major branch of science, as scientists were working studiously to discover the workings of the world/universe at that time. Whether the public had the slightest concept of this is irrelevant.

    I'd say physics still isn't in the public consciousness as big science, although "nukulear" physics sure still seems to be, barely. After all, if it's not slapping Joe Sixpack in the face, it doesn't exist.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  22. Re:Buckaroo Banzai was easy to identify with by jafac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The movie was certainly about 10 years ahead of its time.

    (I can't stand watching it now, because of the nasty 1980's rock-video hairstyles and costumes. But the dialog was some of the funniest stuff in cinema history - - big boo TAY!)

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  23. Just... just hold on... that's good. by VikingBerserker · · Score: 2, Funny

    This article reads like a truck.