Slashdot Mirror


Non-Geeky Gifts for Tech Geeks

An anonymous reader writes "FiringSquad.com has just put out another holiday gift guide. They've gathered together, along with the usual video cards and whatnot, several non-techie toys with a techie slant. With the exception of an mp3 and a digital camera, everything else they recommend is stuff I haven't seen on any list before. They have things ranging from $10 to $7500. My favorite has to be the Blendtec blender. 2 horsepower motor. Turns hockey pucks into mulch."

142 comments

  1. Love that table of contents by Kelson · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you want to jump ahead in the article, here are your options:

    • Introduction
    • For those who se...
    • For those who li...
    • For those who li...
    • For those who li...
    • For those who li...
    • For those who li...
    • For those who li...
    • For those who va...

    Gee, that helps!

    1. Re:Love that table of contents by Joebert · · Score: 2, Funny

      I got to "For thoose who like it fast" & "For thoose who like it in the morning" & lost my train of thought.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    2. Re:Love that table of contents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    3. Re:Love that table of contents by duguk · · Score: 5, Informative
      Enlightenment LED Torches: Luxeon K2 $299 and Luxeon XO3 $40

      Health Blenders BlendTEC for $400

      Shiny Porter Cable 7424 Random Orbital Sander for $120

      Chill Zwilling J.A. Henckels Cermax M66 Wine Chiller for $130-200 or some knives for $13?

      Look good Canon PowerShot SD800 IS Camera or Fuji F31fd for $400 or Pentax K10D Cameras - $4000

      Loud SV Sound and HSU Research Subwoofers, etc, $400 to $7500

      Fast AMD Processors. Woo!

      Morning Impressa Z6 and Impressa E8 Coffee Machine things for around $1000

      Tradition 1GB IPod Shuffle for $80

      Meh, its all adverts really. Heres some junk for the lameness filter:

      Don't read this, I mean really. Its a load of crap. Really, it isn't good. Its just writing for the sake of writing. Honestly. I mean it. Don't read this, I mean really. Its a load of crap. Really, it isn't good. Its just writing for the sake of writing. Honestly. I mean it. Don't read this, I mean really. Its a load of crap. Really, it isn't good. Its just writing for the sake of writing. Honestly. I mean it. Don't read this, I mean really. Its a load of crap. Really, it isn't good. Its just writing for the sake of writing. Honestly. I mean it. Don't read this, I mean really. Its a load of crap. Really, it isn't good. Its just writing for the sake of writing. Honestly. I mean it. Don't read this, I mean really. Its a load of crap. Really, it isn't good. Its just writing for the sake of writing. Honestly. I mean it.

      Monkeyboi

    4. Re:Love that table of contents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your junk text had almost as much content as the article.

    5. Re:Love that table of contents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be 'For those who want to jump ahead in the article'?

    6. Re:Love that table of contents by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter which link I try, they all load a fucking Flash ad that won't go away. Wants to set cookies to bypass; no.

    7. Re:Love that table of contents by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Actually, they recommend Intel processors. The stuff about AMD is just fluff text at the start.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    8. Re:Love that table of contents by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      are you using Firefox and the Adblock Plus extension? that seems to help a helluva lot...

    9. Re:Love that table of contents by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I could fnd a way, but it's not worth the time to worry about it. I'm not in the market for any of that stuff anyway.

    10. Re:Love that table of contents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are a bunch of cameras, an Athlon or an iPod not tech and not geek gifts exactly?

    11. Re:Love that table of contents by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      Look good Canon PowerShot SD800 IS Camera or Fuji F31fd for $400 or Pentax K10D Cameras - $4000
      Woah, if you paid $4000 for a K10 you got mightily ripped off. You should find it for less than 1/4 of that.

      OTOH, just budget $4000 for it. You'll get to buy a few lenses. :)
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    12. Re:Love that table of contents by *BBC*PipTigger · · Score: 2, Funny

      What a bittersweet irony it is that the lameness filter requires so much added lameness to get by it. ;)

      -Pip

  2. But does the blender... by bgibby9 · · Score: 1

    get all the bitz? You know how it goes, there's always a piece of rock hard crap in the bottom somewhere!

    --
    http://www.gibby.net.au
  3. Recommending an iPod? by hypermanng · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While I have no problems with them recommending an iPod - they're okay machines and all - I do sort of wonder why they would make it on their gift list, which would presumably to suggest things one *hasn't* already considered. Can anyone honestly say the thought of giving an mp3 player to someone hasn't occurred to them?

    I was also sort of wondering about the subs - nice recommendations, I must say, but doesn't it make something of an awkward gift? Maybe it's more of a "stuff we thought was neato" list. Certainly the cutlery discussion seemed to wend that way, though even non-chefs could appreciate the novelty of owning a knife that ridiculously fine.

    --
    I am the one true god. However, as an atheist, I don't believe in myself. I guess I have a self-esteem problem.
    1. Re:Recommending an iPod? by joto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yup, the thought of giving someone an mp3 player has not occured to me. Honestly.

      First of all, they are a bit expensive for a christmas gift, which is more than enough to exclude them from consideration from me. Or, if I choose a cheaper model, they are "a cheaper model". Giving away a "budget mp3 player" is about as fun as giving away a "budget whatever"...

      Secondly, most people either already have one, or don't want one. Third, if they still haven't got one, but want one, they probably want to choose their favourite model themselves, and would be more happy for money. Finally, as even the article suggested, I don't want to become tech-support.

      Apart from all that ranting about mp3-players as christmas gift, I must say that I find most of the suggestions on the list completely ridiculous. These are things geeks want, not things geeks should give away. If you are reading this site, you are already a geek, and knows what geeks want. The thing is, your friends, family, significant other, etc, are most likely not geeks (at least not all of them). Give them something they want, not something you want!

    2. Re:Recommending an iPod? by mightyQuin · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you with the exception of teenage family members - they may be less likely to own a player and more likely to want one.

      --
      Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got some idea balls to remove from a manatee tank.
    3. Re:Recommending an iPod? by cliath · · Score: 1

      It must have occured to you. Just because you dismissed the idea does not mean it did not occur.

    4. Re:Recommending an iPod? by joto · · Score: 1

      Only in the same sense that the idea of giving someone a F-15, a rotten salmon, a matchstick, a full scale replica of the Eiffel Tower, or a pile of my own poo has occured to me. But I have dismissed those ideas as well.

      I realize that this is a question of definitions. But no, I have never used more than a second to consider whether I should give someone an mp3-player. And thus I feel justified to say that the thought haven't occured to me. At least not untill I replied to the GP.

  4. Real Customer Friendly by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Great, another web-site that requires you to enable cookies in order to get beyond the advertising. Yet not a word of warning as to all the ways enabling cookies allows anti-consumer 'services' like doubleclick to track your every move and build up all kinds of privacy invasive databases.

    Ordinarily, I would just use a smart cookie manager like CookieSafe but this is suppossed to be a place I can send my non-geek friends to -- people who can't go all ubergeek and know the ins and outs of cookie abuse and cookie counter-measures.

    1. Re:Real Customer Friendly by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Jeezus pleezus you sure do overreact. Fitfully, at that. Entertaining. I give it an 8.5

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    2. Re:Real Customer Friendly by internewt · · Score: 1

      No, the guy's right to bitch about their cookie use. That site gives visitors the following raw deal: Have a permanent cookie and you won't get interstitial ads after the first one (I'm assuming they set a perm cookie: I only allow session, so didn't see how long they tried to set cookies for), or turn cookies off and the site becomes a pain to navigate, because you'll get a full page ad for 15 seconds at every click.
      There are other choices, but lets be honest: The other choices are available only to a minority, the majority of IE surfing users won't even want to hear an explanation of cookies because "it sounds a bit too technical".

      I had a rant on their forum too with a bugmenot.com account.
      http://forums.firingsquad.com/firingsquad/board/me ssage?board.id=feedback&message.id=1877

      --
      Car analogies break down.
  5. Wow$$$ by StillAnonymous · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A bit pricey, no? $300 for a flashlight? A $3600 capaccino machine?

    Maybe I'm just poor or cheap, but most of these are outrageous. Who is their target audience? Fortune 500 execs?

    1. Re:Wow$$$ by Joebert · · Score: 5, Funny
      Who is their target audience? Fortune 500 execs?

      My money is on the people living in thoose execs basements.
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    2. Re:Wow$$$ by LurkerXXX · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not only that, their blender doesn't even have a pull starter

    3. Re:Wow$$$ by PatPending · · Score: 1

      Anyone who works for Google; they're all (multi) millionaires, right?

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    4. Re:Wow$$$ by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

      You think that's expensive? You should see how much they paid to have this ad run on /. this close to Christmas.

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    5. Re:Wow$$$ by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Depends on if they started before or after the IPO.

    6. Re:Wow$$$ by RSquaredW · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be fair, the SureFires are self-defense flashlights. I keep one in my car in the door compartment. They're meant to create an extremely bright light to blind an attacker, and for that job they work well. Easier to use and safer (more range) than a knife, and the cops won't look twice at a guy with a flashlight on his keychain.

      They're definitely not general-purpose lights - you want that very bright light for when you need it. Also, $300 is definitely for their top-of-the-line version - there are good tactical LED flashlights for $60.

      --
      In accordance with E.O. 12958, this post is marked Unclassified.
    7. Re:Wow$$$ by flewp · · Score: 1

      Aren't the ends of the Surefires also designed with little "cut outs" that are for self defense as well? Not sure, but I think I saw as such in an ad or review for them in one of my dad's outdoor industry magazines.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  6. All I want for Christmas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is a list with less than 5 page views.

    1. Re:All I want for Christmas... by legoburner · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Although a bit late for xmas now (or is it), I threw together a brief, 1-page, tech geeks gift list a while back which can be found here. Hopefully it is not modded away into oblivion as being too link-whoreish!

    2. Re:All I want for Christmas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lemme see...
      We use the 'Super Joybox 5 Pro' adaptor under Linux to plug PS2 joypads into our mythtv box, giving us some seriously cool MAME sessions.
      Why do people keep using those shitty PS2 controllers? Do they LIKE hand cramps and aching wrists? Get the Joybox 10 instead, so you can use the far more comfortable Xbox controller.
  7. Ground School by jmagar.com · · Score: 1, Interesting

    These are nice and all that. But the best gift this season, at least for me, is Ground School. Gaining my private pilots license is a dream, and the ground school part is a great way to begin. It's relatively cheap compared to the hours of flight time. And it allows for the dreamer (me) to decide quickly whether or not they have the commitment to the dream or not.

    1. Re:Ground School by Jzor · · Score: 1

      My company paid for any of us who wished to take ground school. It was 2 days a week for about 7 weeks I think. It really made me wanna get my private pilot license, but I really don't have the $$$ for the whole program.
      Honestly, I'd think that a better X-Mas present would be an inroductory flying lesson.

  8. Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The author is impressed with the expense of the items he has chosen and not their utility. Couldn't get through the whole article because the f**kin ads were just too annoying.

    1. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by ximenes · · Score: 1

      Everything they picked seems to be absurdly expensive, although I just gave up around the third page from the absurdity.

      They diss Shun knives as inferior to ceramic and Hattori "damascus" knives, whereas they are much more reasonable (still a little much) for someone who doesn't live to cook. If you aren't interesting in cooking, why buy the fanciest knives the world has ever seen just to say you have them?

      As far as flashlights go, how about a MagLite LED for $50 rather than a $300 flashlight?

      Everything on the list seems to be the most expensive thing readily available in each category; considering that the list isn't geared towards knife, flashlight, cooking, or any other kind of connoisseur, then whats the point? Most expensive doesn't mean best for everyone.

    2. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by karnal · · Score: 1

      As far as flashlights go, how about a MagLite LED for $50 rather than a $300 flashlight?

      They did suggest the Inova X03, of which I don't own (I do own about 7 LED flashlights, including a 3 D cell LED Mag.)

      The X03 is 32$ @ Amazon (through their link). But, if you do get the Mag, there's a suprise - in the tailcap, you get a regular bulb to swap in if you feel like... they don't include another LED module.

      --
      Karnal
    3. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      For the flashlight, if you have ever seen how bright this thing is you would want two of them.

    4. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by linuxwrangler · · Score: 1

      Someone who likes really good flashlights. I bought the L7 (rechargable but larger) and use it all the time for everything from general-purpose to bike headlamp. I can light up things well over 100 feet away - and I'm not talking some wimpy barely-visible light, either. And it's not just the brightness. The beam doesn't have all the bright and dim areas common in lots of lights.

      Bought a couple of L2 models for presents last year and they were hits. My sister, who is far from a geek and initially wondered what possessed me to buy her a little flashlight for Christmas, loves hers. Turns out a flashlight that is small enough to leave in a purse but far brighter than a multi-D-cell monster is rather handy. And when you don't need blinding light, just use the low setting and you have 18 hours of runtime.

      This year my wife is getting a L2 in her stocking. (Well, an IOU, anyway. I tried to order replacement rechargables, a beam-diffuser and the L2 from Surefire and all were backordered - the military is sucking up their production.)

      I actually don't care for the Kroma so I can get away for $175-200/light. But the sky is the limit. They had a limited-edition (hundered or so) model for sale a while back that drained 20 lithium batteries in under an hour. It was bright enough to use for open-water and open-field long-range illumination. But it cost a couple grand to buy and about $25/hour in batteries.

      Pricey? Yes. But fabulous lifetime-guaranteed lights.

      --

      ~~~~~~~
      "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    5. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      when you "into" flashlights, you'll find out that
      1)Maglights are NOT that good - their beam quality sucks
      2)Maglight is the Microsoft of flashlights - they use lawsuits to prevent a LOT of competition

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    6. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by joto · · Score: 2

      when you "into" flashlights, you'll find out that
      1)Maglights are NOT that good - their beam quality sucks
      2)Maglight is the Microsoft of flashlights - they use lawsuits to prevent a LOT of competition

      I'm not into flashlights, apart from the fact that I use them a lot. And maglite makes dependable flashlights that most likely still gives you the most bang for the buck.

      Ok, maglite has a lot of models, but as far as I'm concerned, there are two models worth considering.

      The Maglite charger is a classic. It gives a lot of light, adjustable from flooding to a narrow beam. True enough, in some positions the beam has lots of dark rings and/or spots, but it can be adjusted to sane positions without much trouble, and once you've found your favourite position, you don't need to adjust it again unless you have lent it to someone (takes about 1 second to get it back). On the upside, they are cheap, dependable, long-lasting, repairable, easy to charge, and has all the accesories you need, such as belt-holder, car-charger, etc... And you can get parts from just about any supplier.

      The other model worth considering is the 2AA minimag LED. While not up there with the most expensive surefire/inova/whatever flashlights, it's still a practical, cost-efficient, dependable performer. Most importantly, it runs from AA rechargeables, which means you don't have to spend all your cash on expensive lithium batteries (which quickly adds up, when you need a new pair every night). OK, I would prefer it to be a bit shorter (the old minimag was better in that regard), but you can't get it all.

      Now, go ahead and make fun of all the other mag flashlights in existence. The old minimag, solitaire, C and D-cell models are all outdated (and yes, this includes the C and D-cell leds). But the new minimag LED is a welcome update, and the old charger will probably never become obsolete. And the competition just can't match the price AND quality of maglite, it always becomes a choice between price OR quality (I had a Pelican M6 once, which seemed like a reasonable choice between price and quality, but it lasted less than 3 months and cost me a fortune in lithium batteries, whereas my old minimag has lasted for 3 years without problems (before I got the Pelican, and now minimag LED))

      As for lawsuits, sure, I've heard people complain. I don't particularly care. Just like geeks have a hard time telling non-geeks to avoid microsoft for ethical reasons, you will have a hard time telling me to avoid mag for ethical reasons. I just like two of their models, and don't care about patent issues.

    7. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by triffid_98 · · Score: 3, Funny
      when you "into" flashlights, you'll find out that
      1)Maglights are NOT that good - their beam quality sucks
      2)Maglight is the Microsoft of flashlights - they use lawsuits to prevent a LOT of competition

      3)9 out of 10 officers prefer the 5 D-cell Maglight to conventional police batons.
    8. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      I'm not into flashlights, apart from the fact that I use them a lot. And maglite makes dependable flashlights that most likely still gives you the most bang for the buck. No, Mag-Lite is simply the best of the worst. They're a lot better than your cheap plastic $2 Chinese crap, but they're still low end flashlights. They're essentially still coasting on a reputation acquired 25 years ago, when all other flashlights were essentially cheap junk. They haven't changed significantly since then. Nowadays you can get much better. Anyone who depends on a flashlight gets something by Streamlight or Surefire.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    9. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Tell me, in your experience, how god is the LED one? I found an LED upgrade bulb sold seperately for 40 Euros here in Germany and wondering if its worth the upgrade.

      No LED upgrades for the mini-maglite though, the body for the LED mini-maglite looks different too so I guess thats not gonna happen...

    10. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by joto · · Score: 1

      As I think I made clear in my post, I was not arguing that mag-lite was "best". I was arguing that among maglites many models, there were two models that were "good enough" in their segment, and that if you needed a flashlight in either of those segments, those two were the most cost-efficient flashlights for professional users (like me).

      I'm aware that there exists flashlights that costs 10 times as much as a mag, that MAY have the same build quality. I'm also aware that most anything on the market that costs 10 times as much as a maglite, will also give more light than a similarly-sized model from mag. Lightbulb-technology have improved, and we've got new ways of lighting: LED and HID. That doesn't mean that they are any tougher, or any more cost-efficient. We can't all drive around in sportscars, especially if what we are trying to do is to plow our fields.

      Yes, maglite is coasting on a reputation they acquired 25 years ago. I see nothing wrong about this. Untill the other companies have been around for as long, they can't proclaim that their flashlights will have the same build-quality. (And if you are a high-volume user, you really will start to feel the cost of lithium batteries. It's like running your car on cognac instead of gasoline)

      Instead of claiming that expensive is always better (which is correct, but irrelevant), maybe you can try to find a light from above-mentioned manufacturers that can replace these two lights as a cost-efficient solution. But remember, if it costs 10 times as much, it must last 10 times as long between repairs or replacements. Good luck!

    11. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      Actually, MANY police departments have actually baned things like 5 D Mag-lights for that exact reason

      Go get a nice streamlight, or a Pelican - not too expensive, and great lights. Surefire? Nice lights (I have 2) - but IMHO, a tad overpriced

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    12. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by pixr99 · · Score: 1

      Mag may not sell a conversion for your mini but they do exist. These guys make an awesome product that you can buy at http://batteryjunction.com/.

    13. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by X-treme-LLama · · Score: 1

      I picked up the mag conversion for my 4D cell light for about 20 bucks here in the U.S. I love it. It starts out decently brighter than the incand. bulb. And the 4D will run for nearly 2 days straight before dropping below 50% power. And for days longer it will produce at least some light. The only problem with the Mag conversions is that there isn't enough heat-sinking. The flashlight certainly doesn't get hot, but it does cause the output to drop from 100% to 55% or so rather quickly as the LED heats up. But once they drop to that, like I said, they'll run forever. Much longer than the regular incandescent bulb. And honestly the drop isn't that terrible because the incand. drops pretty quickly too as the batteries start to run out.

      Plus did I mention I much prefer the slightly cold white light of LED's to the very warm light of Incand.? Plus LED's are nearly indestructible, so you won't break the "bulb" by dropping your light, or using it as a club (hey, why else buy a 4D, 2.5 pound baseball bat of a flashlight..). Also they don't get those nasty tungsten deposits (from the filament burnoff) like cheaper incand. bulbs do which causes the output to drop dramatically (Xenon bulbs also help that). And they last 1000's of hours longer than incand. bulbs.

      For comparison the 4D incand. drops to 50% output after a little more than an hour, versus 42 hours for the LED. Great for disaster preparedness, when battery supply and therefore battery life can mean everything. Not to mention saving a ton of money.

      For more information than you ever thought you'd want, go to http://www.flashlightreviews.com. No I don't work for them (pretty sure it's one guy actually) or have any financial stake, but it's a pretty damn good website. And no I don't own any stock in LED companies either. I guess I'm just an LED fanboy. I'm looking forward to the day they can match the output of quality xenon bulbs. Although I doubt they'll ever get to the brightness of HID.

    14. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. I think I will be getting me one soon :)

      I actually lost my old 4 D Cell mag, but will get another and the conversion soon. Nice for living in the car :)

    15. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > They diss Shun knives as inferior to ceramic

      The Kyocera knives are the sharpest thing in the world all right. Til you cut into something hard like a bone. Chippy chippy.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    16. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by ximenes · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but does some stereotypical nerd who could care less about cooking need the very sharpest knives in the world?

    17. Re:Who would pay $300 for an LED flashlight by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Instead of claiming that expensive is always better (which is correct, but irrelevant), maybe you can try to find a light from above-mentioned manufacturers that can replace these two lights as a cost-efficient solution. But remember, if it costs 10 times as much, it must last 10 times as long between repairs or replacements. Good luck! Durability is not the issue. The quality of the light beam on the mag is abysmal. The only thing going for the mag design is the aluminum body, which is very reliable. You can spend only 2 or 3 times as much and get a flashlight that outperforms anything mag has by at least an order of magnitude. Repair and replacement? Durability is about the same for all. The fact that you don't seem to realize how poor the mag is at doing its job, i.e. projecting light, pretty much explains why you still use one. Seriously, I have a $35 Surefire G2 that totally blows away the 4 D-cell Mag it replaced, and it's a tiny pocket unit. Mag-Lite flashlights are junk. The beam is unfocused and weak and the battery life is poor for their size. Technology has advanced and Mags have stayed the same. They're mass-market trash at this point, 25 year old tech sold at discount prices in hardware stores.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  9. Sure it blends ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... But does it run Linux so we can develop a Beowulf of Soviet Russian Blender based overlords. Step 3: Profit!

    Yeah, I really have nothing to do at work at the moment.

  10. article sucks by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some good gifts:

    * GUI C++ Programming Guide
    * Hex/socket set
    * Leatherman
    * Vernier caliper
    * Dremel or Rotozip set

    1. Re:article sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Yes, that is an excellent list. I'd be happy to receive any of those items. Maybe add to that list a 0 to 1 inch micrometer which reads to 1/10,000 of an inch.

      I also think the Kill-A-Watt power meter is a pretty nifty and inexpensive gift. It measures power, voltage, power factor, and frequency of the mains feeding your electrical items around the house.

    2. Re:article sucks by cebarro · · Score: 1

      You must be the PC, right?

  11. If.... by xaoslaad · · Score: 1

    If you were a true geek you wouldn't be so concerned with the blender. The barista in a box over there is a gift from the gods, as coffee is the nectar of the gods, as all true geeks know. I wish that I had $3,600 for a coffee maker that is that simple to use, yet squirts out such delicious looking coffee.

    1. Re:If.... by BluBrick · · Score: 2, Funny
      I wish that I had $3,600 for a coffee maker that is that simple to use, yet squirts out such delicious looking coffee.
      Me? I'll be happy with my $5 Swiss Gold reusable filter that is simple to use yet dribbles out delicious tasting coffee. But you go ahead!
      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    2. Re:If.... by N3Roaster · · Score: 1

      Who needs a filter? Grind the coffee fine enough and enough of the grounds sink to the bottom once you break the crust.

      --
      Remember RFC 873!
    3. Re:If.... by udderly · · Score: 2, Informative

      That blender is off the hook. Did you see the video of it reducing the rake handle to dust? Crap, one of their blenders has a freakin' 20 amp motor. I just bought a hammer drill that can punch through three feet of concrete and it only has a 7.5 amp motor.

      Admittedly, I haven't a clue what I would do with a 20-amp blender, but it looks impressive.

    4. Re:If.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never seen a good super-automatic coffee machine. For less than $1000 you can get a quality semi-automatic and a quality grinder.

    5. Re:If.... by Nick_Psyko · · Score: 1

      Duch coffee sock, a permeable materieal 'sock' that sits in the cup, supported on a wire loop that stops teh whole thing plopping into the cup.

      Don't know if that's what theyre called but I've had mine for years, makes the perfect brew every time!

      --
      mountvol \\?\brain{dbe069b1-65ae-11d5-bab4-806d6172696f}\hu mor\
    6. Re:If.... by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      Admittedly, I haven't a clue what I would do with a 20-amp blender, but it looks impressive.
      Blow a fuse? I don't know about you, but my house has 15 amp circuits.

  12. Why bother? by Captain_Spaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Non-geeky gifts for geeks? Why bother? They're geeks for a reason - they like geeky stuff! It's like getting a pair of socks for xmas... you don't want them, you don't need them, and you'd rather something that plugs into your PC. USB socks, there's a gift...

    1. Re:Why bother? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself, I never seem to have enough socks.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:Why bother? by Sigma+7 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Non-geeky gifts for geeks? Why bother? They're geeks for a reason - they like geeky stuff!


      Most geeky-stuff that non-geeks would consider to be a present for them (e.g. book about computers) is usually something that they would already have anyway.

      Of course, socks can never go wrong, since those things are known to disappear one-at-a-time. Giving them as christmas presents help replenish their stocks.
    3. Re:Why bother? by jacquems · · Score: 1

      I'm a geek, but I'm also a girl, so I appreciate non-geeky gifts like jewelry, etc. Of course, I was extra appreciative the year I got the microchip earrings.

    4. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but where does that leave the usb powered warming socks?
      I dont want a pair, but they plug in and they are still cooler then any OC'ed proccessor

    5. Re:Why bother? by The+Benefactor · · Score: 1

      You can now get USB heated gloves and slippers. Can't be arsed to find linky though.

      --
      To err is human, to arr is pirate.
  13. Blendtec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to say that Blendtec blender is just unbelievable!

    Take a look for yourself:
    http://www.willitblend.com/

  14. My god.... by Mogster · · Score: 5, Funny

    it's full of ads!

    --
    ACK NAK RST
  15. Yet another by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yet another website that destroys perfectly playable videos by wrapping them in crappy proprietary Flash.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    1. Re:Yet another by quacking+duck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Out of curiosity, what's your preferred alternative?

      MPEG - open, but filesizes are too big
      Quicktime - proprietary, not as widely used
      WMV - proprietary
      RealVideo - proprietary, with plenty of Slashdot hate toward the company
      Ogg video - no market penetration
      XVID/various "divx" AVIs - low market penetration

      I suppose the best open and reasonably widespread alternative is mpeg 4, but I'm interested in what you think websites ought to use instead of Flash.

    2. Re:Yet another by VENONA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not the parent, but MPEG4, from what I've seen. I don't really have any experience with divx, though. Am I missing something great? I definitely don't want to mess around with Flash. I'm tired of being bugged about needing the latest player, I don't see what problem it solves that's worth more bloat, etc.

      --
      What you do with a computer does not constitute the whole of computing.
    3. Re:Yet another by YGingras · · Score: 1

      Err nothing? I like my web without animations. I never install Flash and I don't allow gif animations (thank you Konqueror). The web instantly become almost as readable as a book. If you must provide cinematic content, a link do download a divx is perfectly fine with me. Please don't embed moving stuff in the area where I'm supposed to read. Respect your visitors and they might return.

    4. Re:Yet another by nmb3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      WMV - proprietary

      It's true that WMV videos are in an ASF container, however the codec itself is an implementation of the VC-1 codec, a standardized codec that is open to free implementation by anyone (like FFmpeg).

      XVID/various "divx" AVIs - low market penetration

      Uh... AVI containers are probably the single most widespread video container available. *Everything* can read them. As for DivX/XviD...

      I suppose the best open and reasonably widespread alternative is mpeg 4

      DivX/Xvid *are* an implementation of MPEG-4, and it's more and more common for systems to have decoders for them. Downside for Internet video is the lack of streaming support--(typically) the entire file has to download to start watching.

      My biggest beef with Flash-served videos are that usually the player sucks making it difficult to seek the video. Additionally, it's hard/impossible to save the video to your hard drive for later/unbuffered viewing. Finally, Flash videos usually suck pretty hard when it comes to quality/filesize tradeoffs.

      Personally, my favorite video format for online stuff would be WMV, mostly because it is designed to stream content and has great support on Windows and Linux (not sure about Apple). The downside is the DRM crap that some people try and throw in, however ignoring that, for streaming and HD playback on Windows it's very good.

      I suppose Quicktime would be next up since the container also supports streaming (Quicktime itself is not a codec, common ones used are Sorenson 3 and H.264), but the Quicktime player for Windows blows hardcore. It is the slowest and most unresponsive application, even running on a brand new dual core system. For that reason alone I avoid .mov files whenever possible.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    5. Re:Yet another by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Uh... AVI containers are probably the single most widespread video container available. *Everything* can read them.


      The Wii can't. But the Wii can play flash video.

      Flash video is just less of a hassle.. it has the highest penetration of any video player, and you can target Flash 6 and cover everyone.. including linux users which rarely have working embedded video.
    6. Re:Yet another by rho · · Score: 1

      Since most visitors are not horrified by judicious use of Flash or animated GIFs, I think most sites are respecting their visitors. You are not much of a target audience, and will continue to be largely ignored.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    7. Re:Yet another by aliens · · Score: 1

      See the problem with Flash video versus everything else is sites get higher play rates with Flash than with the others. This can then be turned into $$$ by selling pre-rolls.

      I speak from experience as well as there being articles written on the subject.

      I guess YouTube should have gone with some other format eh? I'm sure they would have made the splash that they did if they had used OGG.

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    8. Re:Yet another by YGingras · · Score: 1

      I pretty sure that even though most web users are not horrified by animations they would prefer a still web. It would be interesting to see a study were people are asked to use a web site with and without animations. Judicious use of animations could indeed be good but since 99.9% web sites put way too much animations that serve no purpose it is simply easier to disable the whole thing and to enable only for a few sites. People don't complain because they don't know there is a way out.

    9. Re:Yet another by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      The difference between a Flash and any of the other formats, is that I don't need a specific player, all I need is the codec. I can play Mpeg4 with MPlayer, Xine, etc., as well as browser plugins based on those. With Flash I am limited to one single Adobe supplied player that is NOT supported on my platform.

      I would prefer that the formats not be proprietary. But if I can't get that, my next preference is a proprietary format that doesn't make me reboot into another operating system to use. Any website that demands that of me is a website I will not visit. Period.

      p.s. And don't give me any crap about Flash being available for Linux. I'm not running Linux. But even if I did, I would still have to launch a browser separate from the one I use, then have to cope with the crashfest beta version of Flash many videos require. It's simply not worth it. It's not the proprietary-ness of the format that bugs the shit out of me, it's the requirement to use specific operating systems and browsers.

      p.p.s. For the last six years years I have been happily viewing online videos in a variety of formats. Now suddenly in the last six months nearly all online videos have switched to Flash. More credulous men than I would be screaming "conspiracy!"

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    10. Re:Yet another by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      I shouldn't have to buy a Wii just to watch a crappy online video.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    11. Re:Yet another by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      People don't complain because they don't know there is a way out.

      Precisely. Ad blockers are fairly popular among those in the know. If Tonsumers don't want static ads, think how much less they want animated ads.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    12. Re:Yet another by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      A website's hit rate is not justification enough for me to reboot into a different OS so I can watch a video.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    13. Re:Yet another by YGingras · · Score: 1

      In fact when I discovered this wonderful option in Konqueror to turn off gif animations I realized that it was the animations that was annoying me, not the adds (save for popups). Now I don't block the adds, I just turn off animations (and popups, of course). When I see someone with a "dancing browser", I pity the poor user. How can you say that he likes that? Anyone could see that he is about to go postal.

  16. Will it blend? by quakehead3 · · Score: 1

    My favorite has to be the Blendtec blender. 2 horsepower motor. Turns hockey pucks into mulch." No kidding! This blender would sure turn any holiday gift (geeky or not) into dust! (then sell the dust on ebay)
  17. Turns hockey pucks into mulch. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, that's fine if you intend to get your daily fibre from nearby trees. If you'd prefer something with a bit more taste a Hinari Genie can grind, blend and juice.

    --
    Deleted
  18. For the non gamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, if you are a gamer and are quite content with the virtual shoot em up world contained on a screen, don't bother, move on to the next post about the latest videocard or whatever, but if you aren't afraid to go out to the big room with the big yellow light and desire a little FPS action off screen, you could do worse than to drop a hint or gift yourself with this thing. Checkout this vid! The Xtrema, the machine, and one guy who can handle it *well*.

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-675045863 0308006678

  19. That's so easy !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A big bottle of J&B (Justerini & Brooks) Scotch rare 12 years old whisky.

    Simple enough!!

  20. Non-geeky? by Zorque · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The subs and the Core 2 Duo are fairly geeky things to want, I would think.

  21. Any geek would love to get... by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

    ... Unicomp keyboards with buckling spring technology -- the true heirs of the IBM Model M. Because squishy plastic junk just won't do.

    1. Re:Any geek would love to get... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No. I despise those things. When I'm typing, I don't want to have to turn my amps to 11 just to hear my music (well, when I do listen to music).

      QUIET.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    2. Re:Any geek would love to get... by teebob21 · · Score: 1

      Oh, Stormwatch: I love you. I've got myself a new Xmas present to self.

      I grew up learning to type on the old school IBM keyboards (and a electric typewriter...we were poor). Some folks dislike the clickity-clack of the original IBMs but there is just something satisfying about grinding out 65 wpm on one of those babies.

      --
      khasim (12/9/06): In a blind taste test, more people preferred Coke over the Pepsi that I had previously pissed in.
    3. Re:Any geek would love to get... by ijdod · · Score: 1

      They can even do some funky stuff with colored keys and such. So something completely useless (and therefore fun) like a red ESC key is possible. Better yet, they sell models without windows keys....

      Things they didn't carry over from the real IBM ones: the detachable cable (really a good thing, this is where most of my IBM's failed eventually), and the keycaps. They still have the latter, but you dont get them by default

      Internally, they are pretty much the same. When my unicomp turned out to be not-quite Coke proof, I replaced the inner workings with an original '88 IBM one. It fit without any modifications. Works like a charm too, except for the usual weak spot with the detachable cable.

    4. Re:Any geek would love to get... by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Still, those silent ones have certain disadvantages. They're not as comfortable for long typing sessions, and wear out in a year or two. A keyboard with buckling springs or mechanical switches has better tactile feedback, and may last for decades.

    5. Re:Any geek would love to get... by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      I recommend getting a Model M from 1993 or earlier. There was a fast quality decline from there, to the point that my 1996 M samples have a noticably worse typing feel than the ones from a few years before. I picked up a Unicomp for comparision a few years back, and it wasn't even in the same league.

    6. Re:Any geek would love to get... by Gatton · · Score: 1

      The tactile feedback is fine. It's the audible feedback I find offensive (as the poster mentioned.) I haven't used a model M in several years but I still cringe when I think of that loud springy clacking sound. Now give me a keyboard with the same feel and less sound and I'd be happy.

  22. Blending a Blendtec blender by Traf-O-Data-Hater · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...is what I'd like to see. Well, if not the glass jug then at least the base part with motor and electronics.

    1. Re:Blending a Blendtec blender by wampus · · Score: 1

      Let them know. I know I would LOVE to see that.

  23. YAGDOIPPL by glwtta · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yet another god-damned

    One

    Item

    Per

    Page

    List

    You know what? I don't think I can stand the internet anymore.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  24. That? That's not a blender... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:That? That's not a blender... by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, for the friend that you're hoping to help lose an arm over the holidays, here comes the tool to assure that they won't be able to sew it back on.

    2. Re:That? That's not a blender... by ofcourseyouare · · Score: 3, Funny

      Absolutely, and for all those wannabe murderers on one's Xmas prezzie list -- the perfect way to dispose of the body without worrying about those pesky dental records...

  25. I didn't see any gift ideas ... by the_enigma_1983 · · Score: 1

    I just saw a blocked flash ad. Clicked "Skip ad", and got to another blocked flash ad. Clicked "Skip ad" again. Still the same page. I don't mind ads on websites. Full-page ads that require flash, javascript and cookies to get past, and I do draw the line.

  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. Non-geeky? Don't think so Len... by swordgeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Every item on that list was geeky--most just didn't happen to be geeky in a computer-centric fashion.

    A few points here:
    1) Pod espresso machines are NEVER as good as you can make with really fresh, properly ground coffee, in a good machine, with some significant practice. At the same time, they're probably not as bad as most people are likely to get, since people are lazy. On the other hand, espresso geekery is absolutely first-rate.
    2) Knife hardness != knife sharpness.
    3) Subwoofers should be purchased with the speakers, and should be designed together.
    4) Actually, I'm going to stop. This was just a crappy article all 'round.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:Non-geeky? Don't think so Len... by Duds · · Score: 1

      Those coffee machines you put stupid pods in I always think are just Soda Stream machines for the grown up geek.

    2. Re:Non-geeky? Don't think so Len... by phoenix123 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry to dismiss point 2):

      Knife hardness == edge retaining

      It's not difficult to get any decent steel knife sharp as a razor. Any knife sharpener can do it. The trick is to have a blade that will retain that sharpness for a while. A very cheap knife will lose its sharpness after slicing the first half of a cucumber, better knives last for cutting half a dozen steaks out of raw meat and professional knives need only one re-sharpening per cooking session. If you seldomly prepare larger meals, any _decent_ knife is enough, no matter what the ads are telling. If you earn a living preparing meals, it's an entirely different matter, though. You'd probably go crazy with knives and sharpening stones through the course of a day :)

      One more thing for households:
      -do not clean your good knives in a dishwasher, stainless steel cannot retain edges well enough, so good knives are invariably more prone to stains.
      -rinse immediately after using them, especially after cutting fruits. A sharp edge is an infinitely thin part of metal that is not really resistant to even mild acids. Avoid spilling Coca Cola on them for the same reason :). Using different knives for meat, vegetables and fruits is recommended: meat needs sharpness and doesn't contain acids to eat away the blade - fruits may or may not need incredible sharpness, so you could do with a more stain-resistant knife (less sharp) or a smaller knife made of less resistant steel (sharp but cheap = expendable)
      -don't store them in a drawer or box, use a magnetic holding bar mounted on a wall or a wooden "quiver" instead. Many hard tools with vulnerable edges thrown together damage each other when their container is moved. ,
      -don't sharpen them too much, but sharpen them regularly. The sharp edge isn't simply sheared off through usage, it's folded to the side instead. A sharpening stone brings it up again and hones off wear. If you don't sharpen it, microscopic cracks form and increase edge corrosion plus you need more force driving the knife through the material, increasing shear stress on the folded edge, eventually tearing off parts of it.

    3. Re:Non-geeky? Don't think so Len... by Carnivore · · Score: 1

      While really nice high-carbon steel knives are harder and do retain their edges better than stainless under ideal conditions, I think that stainless has the edge in the real world with micro-rust on the bevel not being a concern. I have Global knives, which are made of their chrome-moly-vanadium steel. They're super-hard and they keep a keen edge for a long time without any rust.

      Honing should be done on a ceramic rod "steel", so that you don't take too much material off, but straighten the bent cutting edge. I use Japanese waterstones to sharpen (remove material) about twice a year.

      Buy good tools and keep them in good shape. Sharp tools are safer than dull ones!

  28. Maglite manufactures in the U.S. by nido · · Score: 1

    2)Maglight is the Microsoft of flashlights - they use lawsuits to prevent a LOT of competition

    Maglite has principles - they manufacture their lights in the United States because they haven't been seduced by the "globalization" trap. They use every tool available to keep some asian company from creating low-quality look-alikes of Maglite's designs. This is simple business sense - no company will last for long if they let a competitor destroy their reputation with "cheap shit".

    Traitors have taken over the U.S. government, which has enabled the present war on the middle class (look for a torrent of Noam Chomsky's Class War talk). The housing bubble has already popped, and an old-fashioned economic collapse is scheduled for 2007. America will be forced to re-industrialize, and if you want to have a job early in the reconstruction, I suggest that you buy a maglite now, on general principle.

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
  29. Re:I need geek gifts for non-geeks by jacquems · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Kitchen appliances/gadgets seem to go over well with geeks and non-geeks alike. They're certainly popular with the kitchen hackers in our house.

    Also, Heston Blumenthal and other proponents of molecular gastronomy have taken cooking to a seriously geeky level. Heston Blumenthal has written several books that would make excellent gifts to get non-geeks to question how they think about cooking.

  30. Get the blender.... by threelegcat · · Score: 1

    you can always use it to blend your unwanted presents.

  31. I was thinking by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    Sex toys but realized they'd be used in some hacked gadget or other.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  32. Amen! by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Insightful
    A bit pricey, no? $300 for a flashlight? A $3600 capaccino machine? Maybe I'm just poor or cheap, but most of these are outrageous. Who is their target audience? Fortune 500 execs?

    Amen! I'm always amused at "gift guides" that are composed of items that are hundreds of dollars. Just how the hell much money do these people think my family is worth at Christmas? A really expensive Christmas gift to me is around $50. If I were married, I'd probably spring for $100 or so for my wife.

    Yet I see guides like this, hear radio ads telling me to by diamonds that cost hundreds or thousands of dollars, or even to do something stupid like buy a new car for my hypothetical wife. A new car? Do these people honestly think I would make such a huge decision without the knowledge, full acceptance, and blessing of my wife?

    Am I just the world's biggest cheapskate?

    Wait, no, I think I know what's going on here. They want me to think I'm a cheapskate if I don't buy hundreds of dollars worth of crap for my family for Christmas.

    Well, I'm sorry, the joke's on them. I think that along with the lesser-expensive gifts I give to my family, a really nice one is not begging them for money the rest of the year because I'd be in debt beyond my imagination for burning through money like that. And call me crazy, but I also think that a really nice gift for one's spouse instead of earrings or a new car that you don't need is—gasp!—a realistic plan for retiring some day so that we can spend wonderful decades together without having to work our asses off for useless junk like, well, a $300 flashlight or a $3600 cappuccino maker!

    Honestly, $300 for a fucking flashlight? If someone game me one of those, I wouldn't be grateful, I'd be extremely condescending. "You spend $300 for a fucking flashlight? Did you win the lottery, or are you just too damned stupid to know that you can get a really good one at Target for less than $10?"

    What scares this geek is that there are obviously people out there who actually buy this junk. What's doubly scary is that they're pitching it to my friends and family as if I actually would want any of this crap. God, I hope they're not that stupid.

    1. Re:Amen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A really expensive Christmas gift to me is around $50. If I were married, I'd probably spring for $100 or so for my wife.

      This might be why you aren't married. ;)

    2. Re:Amen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear ya loud and clear. Like that Lexus commercial where the dude blindfolds his wife and leads her out to this brand spanking new Lexus SUV parked outside; I think those kind of vehicles typically cost at least $50,000, so that guy has to be a rich banker else it would seriously affect his income to just up and purchase a nice new luxury large vehicle.

    3. Re:Amen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing about cars is that you can get them financed, or even lease them. I think that the current lease for a Lexus runs around ~$400 a month.

    4. Re:Amen! by The+Neck · · Score: 0

      Judging by what you have just said, honestly I don't think you have much to worry about champ.

      Neck.
      .

    5. Re:Amen! by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Lexus SUV? No chance, even the entry level RX, with "excellent" credit, and a few thousand down, will hit you up for $800 a month.

    6. Re:Amen! by RoloDMonkey · · Score: 1

      Last year my family and friends pitched in together and got me one gift for my birthday. The restaurant quality, 11 cup Cuisinart. This is not the one you see in most stores. It cost about $400 dollars. I wasn't condescending. I literally hugged it when I got it unwrapped. For some of us the high end stuff is worth it. I bet you wouldn't complain if someone got you a $200 graphics card, or a $600 Playstation.

      --
      Long live the Speaker Bracelet
      Rolo D. Monkey
    7. Re:Amen! by noSignal · · Score: 1
      It's really easy to think that way if you're not married... You can explain all you want about how you wanted to plan for the future and what-not, but if she doesn't get that 'thing' she's been hinting at all year, your explanations aren't going to keep you company on the couch. "But really honey, I thought you'd like a $25 gift card to starbucks! We don't really need all that useless junk anyways, we've got each other!" Good luck pal.

      Oh, and as an aside; a few years ago my wife did buy me a $300 flashlight. A beautiful Surefire that attaches to the bottom of my .45. As it turns out, that $300 flashlight saved both our lives late one night when a couple of drug-crazed thugs invaded our home while we were sleeping. I'll take a $300 flashlight over a very small retirement contribution any day.

    8. Re:Amen! by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      And call me crazy, but I also think that a really nice gift for one's spouse instead of earrings or a new car that you don't need is--gasp!--a realistic plan for retiring some day so that we can spend wonderful decades together without having to work our asses off for useless junk... You must be single.
      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    9. Re:Amen! by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. You remind me of my recent discussion about tires with my dad. I need two more, but just spent ~1 month unemployed, so my dad was going to buy some for me... until he saw how much the tires for my car cost. He couldn't understand why I wanted two more tires just like the ones already on my car when he could get me a set of cheap-o Michelins for half the price. Yeah, you could get a cheap-o set of any brand for half the price, Dad, but I like to drive. I may only drive a (stock) Honda Civic, but I'll be damned if my $100 tires don't make my little Civic much more fun to drive than with the tires that came on it. My Dad just couldn't understand it and refused to buy the "overpriced" tires for me. (Although yesterday he bought some for his car and finally realized just how must the price of tires had gone up since the last time he bought a set.)

      That said, I'm still not sure how my $85 Cuisinart toaster is any better than a $15 Wal-mart toaster...

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  33. Why on earth by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    would anyone use a 1.5 kW bomb-proof blender in a home kitchen? I mean, the ability to disintegrate solid objects is fun, but most foodstuffs succumb well enough to a non-overkill appliance. I don't use a chainsaw to slice bread, either.

  34. karmawhore by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Informative

    link to single page print-ready version, so you don't have to click through page after page of minimal text and maximal ads.

    http://www.firingsquad.com/print_article.asp?curre nt_section=Features&fs_article_id=2069

    --
    -Styopa
  35. astroturfing - mod parent down by jstomel · · Score: 1

    parent is astroturf

  36. Re:I need geek gifts for non-geeks by jstomel · · Score: 1

    Well, you could try leeners.com make-your-own hotsauce kits. The glorius capascin molecule is certainly a geek icon, and really, who doesn't like hotsauce? It's my gift de-jour this holliday season

  37. Allow me to introduce myself by dangitman · · Score: 1
    I'm a blender. I blend hockey pucks, that's all I'm programmed to do.

    Were you any good?

    Are you kidding? I was a star. I could blend a hockey puck at any speed. 30,000 RPM, 32,000 RPM, you name it. 31... But I couldn't go on living once I found out what the mulch was for.

    What for?

    Kitty litter.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  38. worst list by milimetric · · Score: 1

    These people have done no research and have no idea of what's good in every category. How could they mention point and shoot cameras without even touching on Leica's entry into the market. This is Leica people, as in best lenses in the world. They talk about speakers as if all that's important is a subwoofer, this list is not for slashdot, it's for suckers.

    1. Re:worst list by businessnerd · · Score: 1

      Yes Leica is a really good camera maker, but they are not golden. We got my mom a Leica point and shoot 35mm maybe eight years ago, just before the major digital push, and frankly, the pictures weren't that great on it.

      On another note, one positive thing about the camera section of the article was that they finally pointed out that the main factor that makes a digital camera great is the same thing that made film cameras great...THE LENS! I'm tired of all of these megapixel wars. An 8 megapixel credit card sized camera is NOT better than a 5 megapixel SLR. On the point and shoots, you should be looking for optical zooms, not digital zooms. My dad just got a FujiFilm digital. It's a point and shoot, but it's got a larger than average lens and the pictures are amazing.

      --
      "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
  39. "For the gourmand on your list..." by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 1

    gourmand vs. gourmet:

    For the gourmand on your list who's not into wine, a good alternative is the gift of precision cutlery.

    In other words:

    For the person who is devoted to eating and drinking to excess on your list who's not into wine, a good alternative is the gift of precision cutlery.

  40. week-long deorderant by peter303 · · Score: 1

    For those Geeks who dont take showers or change their clothes daily.

  41. If you pay monthly, it doesn't count! by Ahnteis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It doesn't matter that your $50k in debt--as long as you can make the minimum monthly payment!

    What national debt problem?

  42. Flashlight technology by KruiserX · · Score: 1

    "Flashlight technology over the past few years has shifted towards LEDs and with complex voltage regulation circuitry. This means that your lights will be much more efficient than before, and make the most of your batteries." Wish I had that long lasting flashlight in Half Life 2. Then again $300??

  43. Is this geeky? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    These things are great as backup if you have an additional device (like a camera) that uses SD cards. Here's another one. Are there other makers of these thumb drive-sized USB adapter/readers?

    Even cooler would be a micro-SD card inside an SD adapter inside a thumb drive reader - matryoshka-ish!

  44. Scary by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    The scary part is that not only are many people that stupid, but that they also vote too!

    --
    Libertas in infinitum