Slashdot Mirror


Secret Gov't Documents Will be Declassified 12/31

mozzwald writes "This New Year's Eve, at midnight on the dot, hundreds of millions of pages of U.S. government secrets will be revealed. Or at least they'll no longer be official secrets — it may actually take months or more for the National Archives and Records Administration to make those pages available for public consumption."

30 of 301 comments (clear)

  1. in other words by macadamia_harold · · Score: 5, Funny

    it may actually take months or more for the National Archives and Records Administration to make those pages available for public consumption.

    in other words, it takes the government a few months to go over every line on every page with a black marker. The pages might be declassified (but see if you can read the information!)

    1. Re:in other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      in other words, it takes the government a few months to go over every line on every page with a black marker. The pages might be declassified (but see if you can read the information!)


      That's not censorship! They're just making us a favor by highlighting all the good stuff.

    2. Re:in other words by WgT2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry. Perhaps they'll release the blacked-out material as Word docs.

      You'll be able to read everything then!

    3. Re:in other words by amliebsch · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe, but the real challenge will be to read them before Sandy Berger stuffs them in his pants and "misplaces" them.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  2. Too many exeptions. by packeteer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The least of acceptable exceptions is too long. If a document involves multiple agencies it wont be free. This will do nothing to calm down conspiracy theories, but it will be interesting for historians.

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  3. Re:Can't wait... by Threni · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > Can't wait 25 years to know how my president mislead us into this Iraq quagmire. We just lost 100 people so far this month and
    > counting! Very sad indeed. More American lives have now been lost in Iraq as compared to those that died on 9/11.

    I don't know what you expect to find. There's nothing unique about the US intervention in Iraq - it's for exactly the same reasons as all the other meddling in other countries affairs going back through most of the 20th century. No cover ups or conspiracy theories are required - it's been taking place quite openly. You might want to start with `manufacturing consent` or `hegemony or survival` by Noam Chomsky for what's been going on, and how the a free media like that in the US handles it.

  4. Re:Can't wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What about hundreds of Iraqi people's lives that were lost? That doesn't count eh?

  5. Finally by Psychotria · · Score: 4, Funny

    The secret invasion by aliens will be revealed. I, for one, welcome our new overlords. I've been watching them for years on Lost in Space, Star Trek, V, Battlestar Gallactica and The Smurfs. I am looking forward to the secret being revealed and my release from the asylum.

  6. Re:Can't wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hundreds? Try hundreds of thousands.

  7. Re:Can't wait... by oggiejnr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You would be suprised about the anount of documentation. If people lower down in the food chain want to cover themselves the first thing they do is put it in writing. Take the Suez Crisis for example. There is clearly documentation to show that the British used sexed up intelligence to manufacture a war against Egypt to reclaim Suez. If documentation exists to show this then I wouldn't be at all suprised if the same is true of Iraq

  8. Re:Can't wait... by Malc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "More American lives have now been lost in Iraq as compared to those that died on 9/11."

    Why exactly did you draw that comparison? They're two unrelated events. Why not say: more American lives have been lost in Iraq than in Pearl Harbor? Even if 10,000 lives had been lost on 9/11, there would still be no justification for attacking Iraq based on it, and thus no bench mark to compare against.

  9. Call it cynicism, but... by paganizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'll be pretty shocked if anything actually of use turns up. I'll definitely try to take a look myself; I've been searching for years for some of the info on the nuclear tests done in the late 50's, as my dad was in 13 of them.
    Hearing him talking about how much fun it was being in a foxhole 1.5 miles from ground zero, and digging out the rad badges and other stuff he kept as a souveneir, then seeing that there is no record to be found ANYWHERE that his unit was anywhere near where the tests were done has always fascinated me with the subject; hopefully someone will slip up and release a unit list for the Guinea Pig troops.

    --
    Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    1. Re:Call it cynicism, but... by TodMinuit · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've been searching for years for some of the info on the nuclear tests done in the late 50's, as my dad was in 13 of them.

      What kind of super powers does he have?

      --
      I wonder if I use bold in my signature, people will notice my posts.
    2. Re:Call it cynicism, but... by vertinox · · Score: 4, Funny

      What kind of super powers does he have?

      Apparently to have the ability to still have children after 13 nuclear tests.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  10. Re:Can't wait... by Iron+(III)+Chloride · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's true that automobile deaths are extremely prevalent, but they are usually more the result of 1) poor training or 2) excessive alcohol consumption or 3) road rage. It's something that cannot be easily dealt with because it concerns the whole of society. People will always get angry, people will always get drunk, and people will always get mad. It's part of human nature that probably is very hard, if not impossible, to change. It's unlike racism, where you have one clearly defined ethnic group targeting another. Oh, and accidents may also happen due to carelessness, which cannot be avoided.

    On the other hand, the war is a single product of a single administration and the entire US public's attitudes (apathy, ignorance?) towards a single issue. It's much more preventable; it's much more treatable. Thus, naturally we'll be more easily angered about a more preventable bad decision by the administration and its incompetence and arrogance. Perspective is much less the issue here as opposed to the ability to succeed.

    -FeCl3

    --
    Cogito, ergo sum, fosho!
  11. It's nice to see they've solved the problem by MarkusQ · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was recently pleased to discover that our leaders have hit upon an ideal solution for the perennial problem of that pesky public eventually getting their hands on documents like this. It's so simple, I don't know why they didn't think of it sooner.

    Don't produce the information that will make you look bad in the first place.

    For instance:

    • After a government report showed an increase in terrorism around the world, the administration announced it would stop publishing its annual report on international terrorism.
    • A rule change at the U.S. Geological Survey restricts agency scientists from publishing or discussing research without that information first being screened by higher-ups at the agency. Special screening will be given to "findings or data that may be especially newsworthy, have an impact on government policy, or contradict previous public understanding to ensure that proper officials are notified and that communication strategies are developed.
    • The Treasury Department stopped producing reports showing how the benefits of tax cuts were distributed by income class.
    • After the Bureau of Labor Statistics uncovered discouraging data about factory closings in the U.S., the administration announced it would stop publishing information about factory closings.

    Of course, the old trick of covering up / reclassifying things is still in use as well:

    • The FBI attempted to retroactively classify public information regarding the case of bureau whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, including a series of letters between the Justice Department and several senators.
    • President Bush issued an executive order limiting the public's access to presidential records. The order undermined the 1978 Presidential Records Act, which required the release of those records after 12 years. Bush's order prevented the release of "68,000 pages of confidential communications between President Ronald Reagan and his advisers," some of whom had positions in the Bush Administration.
    • The Federal Communications Commission blocked access to a once-public database of network outages affecting telecommunications service providers. The FCC removed public copies and exempted the information from Freedom of Information Act requests, saying it would "jeopardize national security efforts."
    • The Federal Communications Commission ordered destroyed all copies of an unreleased 2004 draft report concluding that media consolidation hurt local TV news coverage, which runs counter to the administration's pro-consolidation stance.
    • ...and so on.

    Still, I think the new approach is much more elegant and will probably save the taxpayers a lot in the long run.

    --MarkusQ P.S. Sources and many more examples here.

  12. Re:Can't wait... by Charcharodon · · Score: 5, Funny
    There was plenty of justification for attacking Iraq.

    The president said "Hey let's attack Iraq" and Congress said "America!...Fuck Yea!" and then Congress said to Americans "Hey let's attack Iraq" and they said "America!...Fuck Yea!" and that's all there is to it.

    There are no bench-marks or justfications for war just details and more importantly the willingness to goto war.

  13. An unnecessary secret is a failure by Bromskloss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not very much for the state having secrets to its people -- the state is created by the people because they needed one, after all. If there still is a great need to keep a secret (just a small need doesn't cut it for me), then so be it, I guess. BUT, any fact kept secret without reson to do so i an abomination! There should be measures taken to ensure that everything that can be revealed is revealed (not the other way around).

    I'm not talking specifically about the USA here -- I'm not an american -- but the same thing applies to any state.

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
  14. UFOs!!!!!!! by curtisk · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Wow. The 25 most used search terms in the last month at the CIA's FOIA document request.

    UFOs are at the top!

    Considering the rest of that list, its very interesting how pervasive the questions around UFOs are. Sadly, sasquatch has fallen out of public favor...

    --

    Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

  15. Re:Can't wait... by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nothing of interest will be there. The interesting info would be in Reagan's term. But just before the info was to be release, W. did an executive order that allows a president or their heir or a current admin to redact any info that they think would damage their reputation. Hopefully the next president will have some morals and allow us none people to see exactly what what past presidents have been and done. That should include ALL of the reagan info including his irangate as well as his work in having Iran hold our hostages before the election and his dealings with Sadaam as well as OBL.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  16. Re:Can't wait... by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why exactly did you draw that comparison? They're two unrelated events.

    Those two events are closely related. Nobody would have supported our "War on Terror" or the invasion of Iraq had we not been attacked on 9/11.

    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
  17. the date is wrong? by name*censored* · · Score: 3, Insightful
    uh, if they're being declassified at exactly the start of the new year(ie, 1 second after 11:59:59 12/31), then wouldn't that mean that they're ACTUALLY being declassified on the 1/1? The new day actually begins at 00:00:00...

    Also with this september 11/conspiracy theory/craziness spin that this thread has taken... If they were clever enough to blow up (their own) building and cover it up, surely they would be clever enough to 1) Do a good job of covering it up (recycled argument from moon landing conspiracy) 2) Pick something that wasn't so difficult to orchestrate (rigging an inner city building with explosives with no credible witnesses willing to testify) eg, a chemical attack (like the 95 subway thing), a car/truck-bomb (terrorists seem to like those), or attacks on foreign US embassies. 3) Pick something that more strongly supports attacking Iraq - they had to do an AWFUL lot of fancy footwork to get from "an afghani terrorist blowing up a US building" to "attack a regime which had little to do with 9/11 (although still guilty of terrible atrocities)" 4) Forget trying to attack anything.. the government spin engine is an incredibly powerful one, it would be just as easy to justify a war with no 9/11 than having to orchestrate a 9/11 attack AND THEN justify a war with it.

    It's a little ignorant to say what SHOULD happen and compare it to what DID happen, considering there are thousands of variables involved that we'll never accurately know (how much fuel the plane had, its exact speed, its exact mass, the exact condition of the building, its weight load, its natural fault lines, the fault lines created by the impact of the plane, other environmental elements etc etc etc). Plus, if the conspirators didn't expect it to fall over (enough to put use secondary explosives, which would be a big giveaway) just from a plane crash, then why would they think that we wouldn't figure it out? There are enough demolition experts out there that it would be a glaring omission to ignore the fact that the experts would notice that a plane couldn't do that on it's own. It's much like how you cannot see the stars in the background of the moonwalk, it's too obvious for such a big conspiracy to miss, the "moon's reflection makes too much contrast" argument is so weak that it must be true. It's much more sensible to disregard the conspiracy given that it's unnecessary and far too difficult a conspiracy to organise.
    --
    Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
  18. Re:Can't wait... by Guuge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It makes perfect sense to compare two deadly events by counting deaths. For example, the Asian tsunami was far deadlier than hurricane Katrina. That doesn't make hurricane Katrina justified, but it does give one some perspective.

    In this case, it's clear that Bush is deadlier to Americans than Osama bin Laden. The comparison suggests that we reevaluate our priorities.

  19. Re:Can't wait... by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 3, Interesting
    He had gassed his own people, killing far more than have died in this current 'war'.
    What crack are you on? There were reports coming out even years ago saying that in 2003 alone, the US led invasion on Iraq killed more people than Saddam killed in the last 20(!) years combined!

    I don't think it's worth a single American life to help people who are not among our own
    Your own what? Race? A more important human?
    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  20. Re:Can't wait... by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Tell me more of this "automobile" you speak of.

    It sounds like a dastardly good killer. But does it offer the value and performance I've come to expect with my laser sharks?

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  21. Re:Can't wait... by q-the-impaler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Conrete is VERY dusty. Take a small chunk of conrete and throw it on the ground. Examine the dust that fell off. Now imagine a Beowulf cluster of these, and there's your frickin cloud.

    I only slightly jest. The concept is the same. Potential energy is a lot stronger than you think. I've been next to an avalanche and I could see how a landslide as such can make you think there was an explosion. The sound is spectacular. Probably a similar idea, only there was no slide, just buckling girders wrapped in concrete falling straight down 1300 ft.

    --
    Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
  22. Re:Can't wait... by slughead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What crack are you on? There were reports coming out even years ago saying that in 2003 alone, the US led invasion on Iraq killed more people than Saddam killed in the last 20(!) years combined!

    Sources:
    182,000 gassed in the late 80's by Saddam.

    57,617 MAX Iraqi deaths in this war.

    Your own what? Race? A more important human?

    My beliefs were not the point of my post, I was just revealing my 'bias'. I will now further elaborate on my beliefs:

    I don't feel this country owes anybody else a thing. Meddling in the affairs of others is likely the most avoidable cause of terrorist attacks on this country and a poor public image in the eyes of other nations. All we have to do is nothing, and nobody can blame us for anything. Obviously, we don't have the cash to be doing this stuff anyway (look at our deficit), and we NEVER get paid. IMO, if we're to go out and be the world's police, the world should pay us back (and more than just buying our Gov't bonds).

    If the US had stayed out of WWI, there may have never been a WWII. If the US hadn't helped the Sudan kick Bin Laden out, he may not have been in Afghanistan. How big do we have to F'up, and how much money (which we don't have) do we have to waste before we stop with this foolishness?

  23. Re:What do they have to do with each other? by c_forq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Has everyone forgotten our invasion of Afghanistan? Seriously, after 9/11 the push was to Afghanistan and NO ONE protested. Before the Iraq war millions protested, with some cities having the largest protests in their entire history Iraq's debacle with the UN inspectors set off the start to invading Iraq, and than Saddam kept bluffing and refusing to say he didn't have chemical weapons or to allow UN inspections to resume. I swear people are trying to rewrite current history to make Iraq immediately after 9/11 and completely caused by 9/11. Maybe that works better for the conspiracy theories, but it doesn't really fit the reality I lived through.

    --
    Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
  24. Re:Can't wait... by theskipper · · Score: 3, Informative

    But, per President Bush himself, one event (9/11) was directly responsible for the second (attacking Iraq).

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20 030319-1.html

    Seems black and white, no?

  25. Re:Can't wait... by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "More American lives have now been lost in Iraq as compared to those that died on 9/11."

    Why exactly did you draw that comparison?


    Look at it this way:

    By his orders Bin Laden sent 2,700 Americans to their deaths.

    By his orders George W. Bush sent 3,000 Americans to their deaths.

    Who is America's enemy?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!