Mac OS X Versus Windows Vista
An anonymous reader writes "With Macworld set to start Jan. 8, InformationWeek has a detailed comparison that pits Mac OS X against Vista. According to reviewer John Welch, OS X wins hands down. The important point: he doesn't say Vista is bad, just that technically speaking, OS X remains way ahead. Do you agree?"
The reviewer should have Steve Jobs autograph his kneepads.
Who would want to play around with Final Cut Pro? It's a toy comparable to something like Ulead's Video Studio. Real production folks use Avid.
Karma: Neutered
Microsoft got ECMA standards for C# and the CLI. Not for .NET in general, which is heavily patent-encumbered. Only a fool would bank his application against Mono.
If you only care to look, and you are a 'true' advanced user rather than a MSCE style parrot button-pusher then OS X wins hands down over Windows for advanced functionality. The main difference is - a new user doesn't have to go faffing around in obscure places, checking obscure buttons under obscure tabs just to get the machine working with basic functionality.
lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
"...corporate purchasing policies are set by Windows-loving IT people who don't really understand the needs of the production staff..."
Spoken like a true mac fanboy lacking any understanding of the history of the platform. Avid was originally a mac application but switched to Windows because MacOS was so obsolete. Avid was once held up as a shining example of the superiority of the mac platform for "creative professionals". Now that it's Windows it sucks sweaty balls and is forced upon the production staff by "Windows-loving IT people".
Go on believing what Steve tells you to.