Slashdot Mirror


Hotel Connectivity Provider SuperClick Tracks You

saccade.com writes "During my last hotel stay, I thought it was a pretty strange that it took two browser re-directs before the hotel's Wi-Fi would show me the web page I browsed to. Picasa developer Michael Herf noticed the same the thing and dug a little deeper. He discovered: '...their page does some tracking of each new page you visit in your browser, outside what a normal proxy (which would have access to all your cookies and other information it shouldn't have, anyway) would do. This "adlog" hit appears to also track a "hotel ID" and some other data that identifies you more directly. Notably, I've observed these guys tracking HTTPS URLs, and of course you can't track those through a proxy.' Herf notes the Internet service provider, SuperClick, advertises that it 'allows hoteliers and conference center managers to leverage the investment they have made in their IP infrastructure to create advertising revenue, deliver targeted marketing and brand messages to guests and users on their network...'" Herf was on his honeymoon when he did this sleuthing. Now that's dedication.

175 comments

  1. I did a little "sleuthing" on my honeymoon by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Funny

    But it involved chocolate sauce, melted wax, and soft restraints. What is this 'Herf' person thinking, signing onto his laptop while on honeymoon? Go get laid you nerd!

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:I did a little "sleuthing" on my honeymoon by Joebert · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cut the guy some slack, he was probably getting ready to print out some diagrams.
      You know how the net is, distractions everywhere !

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    2. Re:I did a little "sleuthing" on my honeymoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you haven't, or didn't the right ways. Otherwise, you'd realized that after some times in a row, you do need to reboot or, at the very minimum, you should have made your partner have to.

      The fact Herf had time means he's got it down right. You, though, I'm not so sure.

    3. Re:I did a little "sleuthing" on my honeymoon by businessnerd · · Score: 1
      What is this 'Herf' person thinking, signing onto his laptop while on honeymoon?
      Downloading couples-oriented pr0n! Duh!
      Those hotel movies are expensive.
      --
      "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
    4. Re:I did a little "sleuthing" on my honeymoon by eric_brissette · · Score: 1

      Not only are they expensive, all they ever show is bobbing man-ass.

    5. Re:I did a little "sleuthing" on my honeymoon by Gonarat · · Score: 1

      There was only 1 box that I "hacked" during my honeymoon...

      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    6. Re:I did a little "sleuthing" on my honeymoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's his wife, not his girlfriend.

      There is no sex after marriage. It's all before marriage!

  2. Double Dipping by udderly · · Score: 1

    Well, I was going to make a snide remark about how they spent their honeymoon, but I really like Picasa, so I refrained.

    However, I remember this happening the last time I stayed in a hotel (a Hilton Garden). At least I kept getting redirected. I am more than a little miffed that hotels are charging me *and* spying on me.

    Next time I will use the VPN.

  3. A true nerd by MyNameIsEarl · · Score: 2, Funny

    A true nerd would consummate his marriage while surfing on the internet and maybe writing some code while he was at it.

    1. Re:A true nerd by Intron · · Score: 3, Funny

      Honey. I thought you said you were getting me pearls and rubies?

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    2. Re:A true nerd by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 5, Funny

      You call that a python?

    3. Re:A true nerd by Gzip+Christ · · Score: 4, Funny
      A true nerd would consummate his marriage while surfing on the internet and maybe writing some code while he was at it.
      I tried to do that, but there's not much else you can do when you're in the middle of a really long fsck.
    4. Re:A true nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honey. I thought you said you were getting me pearls and rubies?

      Just a pearl necklace. Or maybe a perl necklace.

    5. Re:A true nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You call that a python?

      Sorry, Ruby, but Ada like to apologize for that little Scheme of mine; I had too much Java earlier, C? Now lick my left Cobol while I summon Forth my creamy Perl onto you and give you a Lisp for life.

      Hey it could be worse, I was going to call it Eiffel instead of Python.

    6. Re:A true nerd by Elenthalion · · Score: 0

      :-D rofl

    7. Re:A true nerd by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm certian I saw a patch that lets you play tetris. Ah, here it is: http://www.movementarian.org/fscktris/fscktris.htm l

  4. Putty w/ dynamic proxy support and an SSH server. by tgd · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you've got the resources to run an SSH server at home, use Putty with a dynamic proxy and point your browser and IM clients to it via SOCKS5.

    I wouldn't trust any network like that... even if the service itself isn't watching what you're doing, do you trust the other people on that network aren't?

    Its easy to surf or do other network apps safely on questionable networks. At least among the Slashdot crowd its easy... but I've educated even my parents on doing that when using public or hotel internet and gave them an SSH account to use at my house.

  5. The wise man assumes by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    that nowadays all his actions are watched and recorded. I live in the UK, which, I believe, has the highest ratio of CCTV cameras per head of population in the world. To me it's no surprise that when I log in at the Marriot I'm watched. Fortunately the first thing I do is establish a VPN tunnel to my company's network where I'm being watched by the CIO.

    Further than that, welcome to the modern world, cue the cliches (1984, quis custodiet, ...)

    --
    init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    1. Re:The wise man assumes by Billosaur · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Face it, your ISP is even watching you, noting your bandwidth usage, logging where you go, reading your email to make sure it's not spam, etc. The fact is, any transaction that occurs on the Internet is being logged on a server somewhere, and someone has access to that information. If you're lucky, it's just a sysadmin making sure you don't go over some quota, but you have no way of truly knowing. A true paranoic wouldn't use the Internet at all.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    2. Re:The wise man assumes by somersault · · Score: 1, Funny

      A true paranoic wouldn't use the Internet at all.



      Why not, if they're not doing anything illegal, or immoral?
      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:The wise man assumes by BVis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because some of us still care about our privacy; we also think "If you're not doing anything wrong, what do you have to worry about" is just about the most offensive thing we could think of.

      I just don't think it's anyone's business what books I'm buying, or what threads I'm posting to, or if I look up some rash on WebMD, or talk to my wife on IRC, etc etc. I'm not about to give up my privacy for some corporate bullet point about "leveraging marketing assets." They want that info, they can bloody well ask me.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    4. Re:The wise man assumes by rednuhter · · Score: 1

      so, you are saying that, if you legaly buy an copy of "King Kong" from amazon it does not matter that the mafia were monitoring all the SSL data and decoding it through a bot net ?
      "King Kong", "amazon" and "Mafia" are freely replacable terms.

      --
      ERR 411[Max number of witty sigs reached]
    5. Re:The wise man assumes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just how exactly are you supposed to know if you're doing anything illegal when there are laws and provisions "on the books" that you can't know about because of national security?

      For immoral, well, it is a stretch but someone in power could believe that god told them QWERTY keyboards were "of the devil".

    6. Re:The wise man assumes by somersault · · Score: 2

      I just don't get why its so offensive, and what I perceive to be the whole american "I'd rather die than lose my 'freedom'" type attitude. Especially considering the way the american government is acting with things like the Patriot Act, etc, americans seem to be less free than the rest of the western world.

      You're obviously right though that corporations don't deserve to see into your private life and conversations just so that they can target marketing towards you (though I'd prefer to have marketing I find useful than just general advertisements about crap I don't want or need being thrown in my face), but when it comes to things like spam filtering or for example monitoring sites like MySpace to make sure that kids aren't being abused, I don't see anything wrong with things being monitored.

      Again, obviously the government has the ability to go too far, for example with things like the Patriot Act, but personally I would prefer them to have some power, as long as they use it responsibly and for its intended purposes, rather than abusing public trust.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    7. Re:The wise man assumes by CantStopDancing · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I just don't think it's anyone's business The problem is that it is exactly that - business! While you have money to spend someone will *always* be looking at what you're doing, and trying to convince you to give them some of that luvverly moneys.

      --
      I'm running a pirated copy of Linux.
    8. Re:The wise man assumes by somersault · · Score: 1

      When it comes to immoral I'm not talking about the government finding out, I'm talking about things that are 'legal' but you don't want other people to find out, like cheating on your wife or whatever.

      As for the laws, you use your common sense, and if there really is a law against something weird like trying a .. in a URL to go up a level, or spitting out chewing gum on the ground in Singapore, if you do it without knowing it's illegal then you hopefully get off with a warning, though probably not. If you're going to do something slightly out of the ordinary like mess about with web servers or go to another country then it's kind of your own responsibility to check up on the law in those matters anyway.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    9. Re:The wise man assumes by somersault · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it doesn't matter. Though the benefits of using the net tend to outweigh the risks of something like that happening. And if it did happen, you just cancel your card. If your card has suddenly been used to buy a car in Russia or whatever then I don't think you'll have too much bother convincing the credit card company that the transaction should be cancelled, though I'm not sure what the legal comeback would be for a direct debit card (which is my preferred means of online shopping).

      --
      which is totally what she said
    10. Re:The wise man assumes by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Again, obviously the government has the ability to go too far, for example with things like the Patriot Act, but personally I would prefer them to have some power, as long as they use it responsibly and for its intended purposes, rather than abusing public trust.

      So, what color is the sky on your planet?

      This is the very reason why government should have only the power which it actually requires. It doesn't really matter whether power corrupts, or simply attracts the corrupt, or even the corruptible; the end result is the same, and you cannot trust the government. It is in fact the height of stupidity. Ask people in New Orleans how well FEMA took care of them... Ask the handful (at least) of US citizens locked up without being charged or having a trial date set.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:The wise man assumes by somersault · · Score: 1

      Exactly, the power it requires, which comes under 'some power'. You agree that there should be a government, and it's pointless even having it if it has no power. It needs to be able to enforce the law which it creates somehow, and I think it should actually be taking an active role in stopping problems like spam as well. I liked how recently it was getting involved in the security of Windows, and I don't even have to be bothered about it using tax payers' money since I don't live in the US anyway, hehe.

      Sky here just now is kind of a pale grey.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    12. Re:The wise man assumes by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I liked how recently it was getting involved in the security of Windows

      I think this is utterly unacceptable, actually. I think it would be better for the government to simply refuse to use windows until it is secure. First the DOJ drops their case against Microsoft, now my tax dollars are spent on Windows QA? That is fucking ridiculous. I only wish I had a weapons satellite in orbit so I could destroy every Microsoft facility, one at a time, while cackling with glee. With my luck though, the government would rebuild their facilities. "WINDOWS IS VITAL TO NATIONAL SECURITY!" etc.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:The wise man assumes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "If you're not doing anything wrong, what do you have to worry about"

      Ask any older Japanese American who wasn't doing anything wrong where they were from 1941-1945. Or ask your average black person or Indian how they feel about this statement. This country has a stunningly bad history of abusing authority, whether you're doing anything wrong or not.

    14. Re:The wise man assumes by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I just don't get why its so offensive, and what I perceive to be the whole american "I'd rather die than lose my 'freedom'" type attitude.

      Let me put this in other, equally as American, terms. These companies are spying on me and profiting from the data they gather on me. I am not receiving any compensation for my private information. THAT is a big problem for me. If they want to negotiate a price to pay me and I get to choose what they can and cannot have access to that would be one thing, but this is just scummy.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    15. Re:The wise man assumes by karmatic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You ask - "if you're not doing anything wrong, what do you have to hide?". I ask, "if I'm not doing anything wrong, why do you feel the need to spy on me?".

      Avoiding the obvious issues with international law, having your activities spied upon tends to change what you do. In some cases, this is a good thing (less crime) - in some cases, it's not.

      Consider someone who is aware of wrongdoing by their company/politician/etc. With the (relative) anonymity of the internet, that person can go online and expose the wrongdoing. Even with laws protecting whistleblowers from retribution, companies (and in some cases, politicians) have a history of making their lives unpleasant anyway. What keeps people from arbitrarily running smear campaigns? With sufficient evidence to convince a judge of wrongdoing by the purported "whistleblower", injunctions and subponeas can be used to stop (and identify) the person in question. The government has the power it needs to enforce (against it's own citizens - it couldn't get foreigners anyway) libel laws online, it just has to go through a judge first. Personally, I think that standard is often too low, but that's what it is.

      In addition, much of the purpose of monitoring people online is to attempt to determine information about an individual by the sites they visit. Judging from my history, it looks like I'm a staunch liberal, with aids, and an ACLU supporter. This couldn't be farther from the truth (the AIDS is due to reasearch about blood testing techniques - the batch of blood, mine and others, had someone with AIDS attempt to donate). As an example, reading neo-nazi propanda does not mean you support their cause, or even that you don't find it morally reprehensible. An employer checking the proxy logs won't necessarily know that.

      The final argument I would make for privacy is that there are those who would invade the privacy of others to further their own agenda. In the United States, the constitution has the phrase "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated". At the time this was written, this pretty much covered all one did and owned. To ensure law enforcement could do their job, the constitution also states "no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." For the government to invade the privacy of an individual, a judge had to determine that there was sufficient cause for a warrant. Politicians have used government resources to attack other policical parties (watergate), imprisoned american citizans of japanese descent, improperly sieze currency and other assets for public use without just compensation, and a host of other wrongs. Honest actions can and have been used in court to make innocent men look guilty - "If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him."

      In short, if there is evidence I'm committing wrong, convince a judge of it, and get a warrant. If you lack enough evidence to convince a judge (it's a fairly low standard, really), you shouldn't be spying on me anyway, even in the name of "safety". The safest environment would be a world where throughouly screened guards "protect" the rest of the population, who all sit alone in their padded safe. It would be the ultimate, absolute safety and security, but certainly not a place I would want to live. Freedom is an end worth pursuing on it's own, and it is important to remember that (at least in the US), the government [supposedly] derives it's power from the consent of the governed. If that is no longer the case, the people have the right (and obligation) to replace it with one that does.

    16. Re:The wise man assumes by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "Though the benefits of using the net tend to outweigh the risks of something like that happening."
      Not if you are the one it happens to.

      "I'm not sure what the legal comeback would be for a direct debit card"
      You get your money back, like a regular credit card, but it may take some time. Happened to a friend of mine - had his bank account drained and it took about 3-4 weeks to get everything straigtened out and get his money back. Sucked for him - living for about a month with zero money in the bank...
      Now if you get your identity stolen, that is another matter. A work acquaintance I know had their identity stolen about 2 years ago and is still fighting to get some things cleared off her credit reports related to the incident. No fun!

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    17. Re:The wise man assumes by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      If I'm not doing anything wrong, why do you need to look!?

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    18. Re:The wise man assumes by Brad+Eleven · · Score: 1

      This is the very reason why government should have only the power which it actually requires.


      "Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." ~Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776

      So the requirements are up to We The People. I get the feeling lately that too many of us are too busy to worry about such a thing, much less do anything about it.
      --
      "Press to test."
      (click)
      "Release to detonate."
    19. Re:The wise man assumes by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      And the converse:

      "I am not doing anything wrong, so you have no business watching me."

      Leading up to one logical fallacy pile of useless poop. (Both directions.)

    20. Re:The wise man assumes by MikeVx · · Score: 1
      You get your money back, like a regular credit card, but it may take some time. Happened to a friend of mine - had his bank account drained and it took about 3-4 weeks to get everything straigtened out and get his money back. Sucked for him - living for about a month with zero money in the bank...


      This will likely get me groused at, but if you are stupid enough to have a debit card on the same account you write important checks on, you are not so much asking for trouble as kidnapping it. The indirect penalties for card compromise are so large that I can't comprehend why anyone would take the risk. My debit card is on a dedicated checking account that exists solely to support the card. I write a few small checks a year (the odd magazine subscription or such) to keep that function from inactivity issues. If scammed, the damage is limited to the balance in the account plus having to contact the 4 companies that I have card payment set up with. My regular account, and all the really important bills, are immune to this particular line of attack. I just make sure that I have my next few weeks planned debit card expenditures on deposit in the card account and I'm good to go.
      --
      Sigmentation fault - core dumped
    21. Re:The wise man assumes by somersault · · Score: 1

      I'd say the government has more right to make sure that people aren't doing anything wrong. Anyone can say that they're not doing anything wrong, but a small percentage of those people will be lying.

      There must be a system that can minimise the amount of abuse that is possible through governmental monitoring of our activities, for example using machines as much as possible for scanning data, then having a group of carefully screened people checking up on any flagged data, and checks of those people's work (kind of like the meta moderation on /.). It will always be possible to take advantage of people in this world, but if enough people are involved then that should hopefully minimise the power of any one person, which will keep corruption levels down.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    22. Re:The wise man assumes by somersault · · Score: 1

      Hello little guy, you must be Schroedinger's cat, I presume? What are you doing wandering around here?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    23. Re:The wise man assumes by somersault · · Score: 1

      Even if you are the one it happens to... you can't just live your whole life doing nothing for fear that something will go wrong. Taking proper precautions is a good thing to do, but not just stopping everything.

      How many people do you think are trying to crack SSL connections via a botnet, when they presumably will get a better ROI from spam, phishing scams, or exploiting Windows/IE vulnerabilities? Am I being too naieve here? People tend to go for the easiest options.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    24. Re:The wise man assumes by somersault · · Score: 1

      Well since the public have chosen to make Windows standard, and even the government are using it, then someone has to get them on the right tracks. It is for the public good anyway, but you're right that Microsoft should be sorting things out themselves, and the government should be charging them for these services.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    25. Re:The wise man assumes by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Well since the public have chosen to make Windows standard

      My whole point is that the public didn't choose. They were tricked or forced into it (depending on the situation) by Microsoft's anticompetitive practices. We found them guilty of violations of antitrust regulations and then told them it was okay and we were going to let them go. Now we're doing security audits of their software for them?

      It would be nice to figure out who got paid off to make this shit happen.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:The wise man assumes by somersault · · Score: 1

      The public have been using Windows since way before the antitrust thing, but I guess that's more just luck or smarts on Microsoft's part for supporting the most cheap/common architecture at the time (actually didn't they support PPC for a while too?). I really didn't like Windows 3.1 when I used it though, compared to Mac and Amiga OSs like I was used to, it was pretty crap. Obviously it's more advanced these days, but I don't get the same satisfaction out of using a PC that I did with my Amigas and Macs.. just feels so dull and lifeless.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  6. I've always worried about this... by dslknowitall · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...which is why I only get online using my corporate VPN, and never visited any sites that required a login (banking, blog, yadda yadda).

    Of course that's assuming the VPN is secure enough...i'm sure there's a way around everything. Hell, just connecting to the WiFi and checking your email can give anyone your password if they have half a brain.

    1. Re:I've always worried about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This is assuming your VPN forces ALL traffic through the tunnel instead of doing "split tunneling" -- where only traffic that's has been identified as "interesting" (i.e. just the internal subnets you have at work or where ever you're VPNing to) gets sent through the tunnel & everything else is ignored.

  7. You mean you didn't suspect this automatically? by davmoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You mean to tell me that Slashdotters, some of the most paranoid people on the planet, didn't just automatically assume hotels did crap like this on their networks to make extra money? Are people here that damned naive? The story that would be news would be a hotel that does *not* do this.

    Any time I use a network that isn't my own, be it a hotel, restaurant, or even the public library, I just automatically assume that someone who wants to remain unknown is taking an active interest in what I'm doing. Otherwise, why would any of these places provide free networking in the first place. They aren't doing it out of the goodness of their heart and so they can sleep warm and cuddly at night. They're doing it because they've found other ways to make a buck off of it.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:You mean you didn't suspect this automatically? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Otherwise, why would any of these places provide free networking in the first place.

      You wrote this as a rhetorical question, but there IS an answer. If they don't have free wireless, you'll go somewhere else. The only place where you typically can't get free wireless is in a casino, because they want you on the floor and spending money. (The casino I work in is an exception - but it's not in Vegas, either.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:You mean you didn't suspect this automatically? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell you for a fact that any hotel that uses a Guest-tek system for providing internet access is not actively spying on you. The only time they care about what is traveling over their system is when A) people complain about it being slow, or B) when law enforcement calls them with questions. Other then that, the only info they keep are your standard DHCP and linux system logs.

    3. Re:You mean you didn't suspect this automatically? by node+3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The story that would be news would be a hotel that does *not* do this. No. This is news because it's excessive and uncommon.

      Otherwise, why would any of these places provide free networking in the first place. They aren't doing it out of the goodness of their heart and so they can sleep warm and cuddly at night. They're doing it because they've found other ways to make a buck off of it. Not everyone is so obsessed with money as you seem to think. Some people, even astute businesspeople, make decisions based on things like, "doing what's right", "giving back to the community", and "providing quality and value". I highly doubt that your average coffee-shop free WiFi is snooping on you.

      Such extreme cynicism (as you seem to be promoting) is detrimental to society, and makes for a poor foundation to live by.
    4. Re:You mean you didn't suspect this automatically? by arootbeer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It seems to me that your average coffee shop or cafe, local bookstore, any place that doesn't have a huge corporate structure behind it like B&N or Starbucks, is not going to have the least bit of interest in where you surf or what you do. If I were a coffee shop owner (I've considered it more than once) and wanted to add wireless, I would go out and buy a nice consumer grade wireless router, plug it into my cable modem, power it on, post the SSID on the counter, and go back to selling coffee. It becomes a feature of the establishment, and for anyone who's curious, I can tell them exactly how it's set up.

      If someone approaches my one coffee shop with the offer of "free wireless service" and they'll pay me a set amount per month to allow it to run in my store, I would turn them down. The hassle of having to allow someone else access to your store whenever there's a problem, as well as scheduling and getting help promptly, as opposed to taking down the SSID sign, stopping by Best Buy on the way home, and then putting the SSID sign back up the next day, would require an awfully rich proposition, and my guess is it wouldn't be worth it to the research company.

    5. Re:You mean you didn't suspect this automatically? by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

      The hotel staff do not even know what this is all about. To them it is a necessary evil[expense] in order to compete. If you truly wish this to stop, talk to the GM (General Manager) and simply advise him that you do not appreciate the intrusion into your privacy.

      One thing hotels need is their client's trust. If word gets out that a hotel is sharing information on it's clients it could be the end of the establishment at least for the respectable ones. Most pride themselves on their conduct. Filling out a comment card to that effect will have the same results. If you do not receive a call from the GM then, if I were you, I would never stay at that hotel ever again because that is not all that they are selling....

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    6. Re:You mean you didn't suspect this automatically? by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > Any time I use a network that isn't my own, be it a hotel, restaurant, or even the public library, I just automatically
      > assume that someone who wants to remain unknown is taking an active interest in what I'm doing. Otherwise, why would
      > any of these places provide free networking in the first place. They aren't doing it out of the goodness of their heart
      > and so they can sleep warm and cuddly at night. They're doing it because they've found other ways to make a buck off of it.

      Actually, if it weren't for laws like CIPA we wouldn't even filter our free internet access. I admin for public library, we offer free WiFi access from all six branches 24/7. Yes people are on the parking lot at night several times a week, go figure. We do run a transparent squid proxy, but that is because it is the best way to solve some problems.

      1. It is where we could hook in the Federally mandated smut filter.

      2. It lets us gain the bandwidth advantages of a cache.

      3. It lets us do a stupid net trick (along with linux's advanced networking) to flip most (but not all, that is they tricky part) the http traffic out a DSL link to effectively double our available bandwidth.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    7. Re:You mean you didn't suspect this automatically? by spun · · Score: 1

      I both agree and disagree with you. It is not only detrimental to society to believe that all humans are purely selfish and mercenary, it is not true. Recent experiments in economics have shown that the majority of people will, given the opportunity, value fairness and reciprocity more than pure self interest. It is our high level ability to cooperate with each other that sets us apart from other animals.

      However, there are a small minority of people who will always act selfishly, and the higher up you go in business or politics, the more of these people you will find. It is not uncommon to find large corporations doing things like this at all. So while I agree with you that complete cynicism hurts individuals and society, I also think that in big business the crap has risen to the top. In general, the high level business person focused on "doing what's right", "giving back to the community", and "providing quality and value" is the exception, not the rule.

      In fact, as a general rule I would say that business people who love the business they are in more than money will never rise to the highest levels. Rather unfortunate, but understandable. Our economic system is based on the falsehood of "selfish actor" theory. Of course it is going to promote selfishness.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    8. Re:You mean you didn't suspect this automatically? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1
      Not everyone is so obsessed with money as you seem to think. Some people, even astute businesspeople, make decisions based on things like, "doing what's right", "giving back to the community", and "providing quality and value".
      Some people also go broke.

      Face it, you can put a price on human dignity. Marketers do it every day, and so do businesses. You honestly think any private company gives a danm about breaching customer's trust, making what were once regarded as private transactions, "business community" public. They don't care. And lets be honest, neither do most customers.

      The difference between ISPs selling your browsing history and urologists selling pictures of your genitals is only one of opinion, not degree. Your data is out there, floating around changing hands, being poked and prodded, examined and analysed by marketers intent only on bothering you and others with more ads and spam. Worse, someone you trusted made money by putting that data up for sale.

      Personally, I would regard this state of affairs as even more offensive than perverts masturbating to pictures my urologist sold them, but most people are quite happy to gurgle away browsing the internet while this is going on. It's a matter of opinion, not degree, but right now most people don't even realise when someone is personally insulting them anymore.
      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    9. Re:You mean you didn't suspect this automatically? by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      The story that would be news would be a hotel that does *not* do this. No. This is news because it's excessive and uncommon.

      Otherwise, why would any of these places provide free networking in the first place. They aren't doing it out of the goodness of their heart and so they can sleep warm and cuddly at night. They're doing it because they've found other ways to make a buck off of it. Not everyone is so obsessed with money as you seem to think. Some people, even astute businesspeople, make decisions based on things like, "doing what's right", "giving back to the community", and "providing quality and value". I highly doubt that your average coffee-shop free WiFi is snooping on you.
       
      Such extreme cynicism (as you seem to be promoting) is detrimental to society, and makes for a poor foundation to live by.

      Although quite often companies offer free Wi-Fi in an effort to draw in more customers. So it *IS* about money, in a sense.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  8. Not-quite-honey Moon by FrozenFOXX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not dedication, just means he's not particularly enthusiastic about his honeymoon.

    --
    "Just a fox, a whisper."
    1. Re:Not-quite-honey Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, probably held their honeymoon at Starbucks, three blocks around the corner from their tiny apartment.

  9. I call bullshit by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Herf was on his honeymoon when he did this sleuthing. Now that's dedication.

    Come one. This is slashdot. More like "Herf was taking a break from a month-long WoW session in his parents' basement when he did the sleuthing."

    Like we'd buy that someone here even *knew* a girl, much less got married or went on a honeymoon!

    1. Re:I call bullshit by $pearhead · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about a girl? It's the 21th centrury you know :-)

    2. Re:I call bullshit by $pearhead · · Score: 1

      Ok, 21st century.

    3. Re:I call bullshit by redelm · · Score: 1
      I have no doubt you are speaking from your personal experience. So be it.

      I will speak from mine: I have no doubt. Nerds are actually very attractive to certain women. They like the reliability and equality. Many have been seriously burned being arm candy for jocks & preps.

      As for coding on Honeymoon, why not? Are you assuming an absence of pre-marital sex? There is also such a thing as too much togetherness, and some breathing space even on a week-long honeymoon is a good idea for both.

  10. Not as stupid as others seem to think by pdawson · · Score: 3, Insightful
    FTFA:
    It turns out that Lorna and I both noticed and both got upset about it, so I'm spending a (small) amount of time figuring out how this thing works and what it's after. After all, I'm still on my honeymoon.


    He's on his honeymoon, but looks like he was lucky enough to marry another geek, so its all good
    1. Re:Not as stupid as others seem to think by DoctorPepper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some of us are lucky, some no so much.

      I had the great fortune to also marry another geek. She's not so much of a computer geek, like me, she's more of a science geek (also like me) and a mathematics geek.

      She also thinks my two great hobbies, computers and ham radio, are "cute", and allows me to spend inordinate amounts of money on them ;-)

      --

      No matter where you go... there you are.
  11. Now that's dedication. by Threni · · Score: 0, Troll

    I believe the word you were looking for was `sad`.

  12. https urls? by Beached · · Score: 1

    How do they do that? From what I understood all that a man in the middle could see was the host ip address as everything else is authenticated/encrypted. Or else you would get a security warning upon visiting the page.

    --
    ---- aut viam inveniam aut faciam
    1. Re:https urls? by DaveCar · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are right, but they will be doing your DNS lookups for you too, so let's say they see www.myxxxporn.com get resolved to aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd for your client, then an https request to aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd from your client then there's a pretty good chance you're viewing pages at www.myxxxporn.com. Exactly what you are viewing they don't know, they can't see the content or the path part of the URL, but it's probably good enough to work out what you might be interested in.

      Set up an squid/ssh server at home/work, set your browser's proxy settings to a localhost:port and portforward everything with ssh to your home machine. I personally also would only use web based mail (via ssh/proxy) or imaps to read mail too, I wouldn't trust a client not to connect insecurely with imap+starttls, but that's probably just paranoia.

      If you are on some kind of public network just assume that someone is watching/mitming everything you do. You don't want to end up on the wall of sheep.

    2. Re:https urls? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      From what I understood all that a man in the middle could see was the host ip address as everything else is authenticated/encrypted. Or else you would get a security warning upon visiting the page.

      There are SSL proxies that will present to you a certificate for www.whateveryouwentto.com, and talk to you in SSL while talking to the website in SSL. Yes, you'll get a "who the hell signed this thing?" popup... unless of course you've installed the signing certificate from the proxy as a trusted certificate. Remember that when you're using a computer not in your control, or if someone gives you a CD of "things you have to install" in order to get on the internet.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:https urls? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Set up an squid/ssh server at home/work, set your browser's proxy settings to a localhost:port and portforward everything with ssh to your home machine. That still doesn't do anything about the trail of DNS lookups though, does it? Even if they don't see any traffic to aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd, the request for resolution of www.myxxxporn.com is pretty telling by itself.
      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    4. Re:https urls? by DaveCar · · Score: 1


      yeah, you're right. duh, forgot about that. it's fine for regular http of course, but the client does have to do the lookup for https. maybe port forward a socks proxy then :)

  13. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, You track Hotel Connectivity Provider SuperClick!

    1. Re:In soviet Russia... by Miraba · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why did I have to scan most of the way down the page to find this? For shame, people.

    2. Re:In soviet Russia... by Coucho · · Score: 1

      So in Soviet Russia, You Track Hotel Connectivity Provider SuperClick?

      --
      *pSig = NULL;
  14. Superclick or Superchick by tbcpp · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who read "Hotel Connectivity Provider SuperChick Tracks You". I thought "why on earth would a CCM rock band be working for a hotel?"

    --
    Man is the lowest-cost, 150-pound, nonlinear, all-purpose computer system which can be mass-produced by unskilled labor.
    1. Re:Superclick or Superchick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes.

  15. Obligitory by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    In Corporate America, hotel tracks you!

    1. Install wifi network
    2. track wifi users' net traffic
    3. ...
    4. Profit!

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  16. Dedication by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1
    Herf was on his honeymoon when he did this sleuthing. Now that's dedication.
    To whom?
    1. Re:Dedication by Lectoid · · Score: 1

      To Nerdism? Geeks of the World?

      --
      Is it just me, or do you hate it when people say "Is it just me..."?
  17. A disturbing trend by NimbleSquirrel · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Unfortunately, this is only going to become more widespread. Hotel chains are only interested in profit, and running their own in-house ISP just isn't profitable. They will contract out whereever possible, and for the lowest price.

    Superclick already has the backing of major Hotel chains, so it already has recognition in the marketplace (hotel owners). That is not going to change. They would also be very competitive for the services they provide and, given what has been found, it is not unreasonable to think that they are cheaper because they sell off the information they gather to marketing companies.

    I cannot see this kind of tracking coming to an end until either the mainstream media make a story out of it, or someone sues the Hotel chain for breaching their privacy (or both).

  18. Some hotels intercept SMTP traffic too by toga98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I noticed some hotels intercept SMTP traffic after a client complained he couldn't send email through our mail server while he was on the road. The hotel's service provider was trying to masquerade as our mail server and attempting to intercept the mail delivery. When I tested it I sent a test message through the mail server that was representing itself as our mail server and received the message 12 hours later. Interesting that it took that long to deliver the message and surprising that they would try to intercept messages and authentication information in this fashion. If I remember correctly, this was the Hilton in Chicago. I can't remember the name of the organization that was providing the service for the hotel.

    1. Re:Some hotels intercept SMTP traffic too by NimbleSquirrel · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would be http://www.superclick.com/. Take a look at their customers. Hilton is one.

    2. Re:Some hotels intercept SMTP traffic too by Alpha232 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I won't try to claim there is no evil in this instance...
      However there are some providers that do the same type of thing with the genuine interest in helping the guest.

      This is NOT uncommon; this is all about providing transparent network services. There are systems already out there (STSN, et.al.) that don't even require you to use DHCP.. If your IP is static, it handles the masquerading needed to make it work without your intervention, same for DNS and Mail.

      Take for instance your mom and pop traveler, they are setup for cable broadband, their ISP comes to their home and hard wires the DNS and SMTP settings, and sometimes the IP. Mom and Pop go on vacation and bring their laptop, yes Virginia some non-geeks/non-business people own laptops. What settings do they need to know how to change in order to get online? At a minimum their IP is hopefully DHCP but I'll say that is not always the case, and also DNS which would be set by DHCP unless their IP or DNS settings are hard coded. In this case, the system would see the system using an IP that isn't part of the hotel network and wasn't assigned by the server, so it will do what is needed to make that IP work. Same thing goes for DNS, it will route all DNS requests to its internal DNS server, and sometimes ISP's don't allow public access from the outside.

      As far as SMTP is concerned, would you be surprised that in this age of rampant spam that Mom and Pops ISP refuse connections from outside their network? Also in a growing trend, the ISP the hotel uses wants some assurances that the public access isn't allowing mass spamming. In this case the hotel(or their network provider) routes all SMTP traffic to one server on their network which queues it and sends it out. They could be doing spam checks or simply a queue threshold/throttle to limit the damage Mom and Pops zombified laptop can do.

      That last point is also my last point, from the Hotel/ISP point of view you're using a computer that is not controlled by the person who owns the network. Most companies do not allow unsecured systems on their network, in a hotel, that is the idea... so measures must be taken to not only have the network adapt to the user but also to protect the host from their guests.

    3. Re:Some hotels intercept SMTP traffic too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hello, I do tech support for an outsourcing company that does support for a large number of independently owned hotels.

      This is actually done mainly for compatability reasons. Many people are configured for smtp without authentication, so what happens is when they try to send email they get "we do not relay" type errors from their home smtp server because they are not connected to their regular ISP (their home isp uses IP white lists to decided who is allowed to relay). So, some hotels redirect outbound port 25 to a server that is configured to relay for that hotel.

      I've noticed most hotels that do this do not redirect smtp via ssl, so if you're concerned about it then set up smtp over ssl and make sure you have smtp auth enabled.

      As to why it took 12 hours to deliver the mail.. that's shame on the admins for a slow server. :)

    4. Re:Some hotels intercept SMTP traffic too by toga98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Regarding SMTP, we do auth through TLS. That's why email failed to be delivered through their system. My point is that it is disturbing that they capture / attempt to capture authentication information from their clients without disclosing this information. There is a lot of room for abuse considering the type of communication that takes place over email by business travelers. Especially, as you mention that most ISPs either do not require authentication or secure authentication. Some of this could be mitigated by the use of certain email tools, but unfortunately things like PGP and other methods of encrypting communications via email are not well supported by email clients and are even harder to use by those email clients that support them. Not something that a typical business user would be able or willing to manage.

    5. Re:Some hotels intercept SMTP traffic too by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      What he said. Outgoing SMTP is about the only setting that needs changed from site to site for 99% of users. It used to annoy the hell out me but...

      an alternative to your ISPs SMTP is to use Googles SMTP server, which also has the added bonus of being wrapped up in SSL. You need to have a valid account and validate any "from:" address you intend to use on Googles page, but other than that it's been working flawlessly for me for ages now. Works from any location, I use it on my laptop & PDA. Your email client needs to support SMTP authentication and SSL connections for SMTP, but most recent ones do.

  19. Herf was on his honeymoon when he did this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "Herf was on his honeymoon when he did this ..."

    A sure sign on trouble. Even a caveman wouldn't do that.

    1. Re:Herf was on his honeymoon when he did this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even a caveman wouldn't do that.

      Bigot. The GEICO caveman would.

  20. Re:Putty w/ dynamic proxy support and an SSH serve by sjwest · · Score: 1

    or run this as a cgi script on a webserver http://www.jmarshall.com/tools/cgiproxy/ not that 'anon' but better and no adverts either. No website should be without one and we have it running too

  21. Some? How about "most"? by Svartalf · · Score: 2, Informative

    They're intercepting all of the SMTP traffic outbound ostensibly to prevent spammers from renting a room for the night and using their "high-speed" access to cover their tracks. Since my SMTP server can use the alternate authenticated (and SSL encrypted) ports, they're not dinking with my email right at the moment- either way. Their little mail proxy engine is like an open relay and gets rejected by other mailservers if they've got those sorts of countermeasures on. I'd sent some emails to my friends and wife back home to my personal domain- got a bounce that didn't make any sense- it was coming from ME, through what claimed to be a symantec based mailserver. I promptly changed access methods and have had no issues since- I'm not going through their garbage for anything but the web- soon, I probably won't even be doing that much.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  22. OpenVPN by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or just use OpenVPN. I use this on my laptop. Set it as the default route, use the internal DNS and your good to go. I also use an internal proxy server. So when I'm at a coffee shop or hotel doing some work, the only thing they get to see is encrypted traffic to port 1194 (udp).

    Over that connection I can do anything. Instant messaging, email, SSH, http, ftp, BitTorrent, etc.

    --
    "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    1. Re:OpenVPN by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 1

      Shawn anyway you can show me this?

      You can reply to this comment or email me. I'm running OS X...Thanks!

    2. Re:OpenVPN by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, an SSH connection is much more likely to be allowed out than VPN traffic.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    3. Re:OpenVPN by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Or for the non-techies, Hamachi + internetsharing of choice.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    4. Re:OpenVPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know what tracking OpenVPN does? I'll have to go their web site to find out. I generally think that anything you get for free has some cost associated with it (tracking, advertising, etc), and things that you pay for are still probably subsidized by other revenue from the provider (credit cards, air miles, warranty registration, etc).

    5. Re:OpenVPN by dotgain · · Score: 1
    6. Re:OpenVPN by dotgain · · Score: 1
      I generally think that anything you get for free has some cost associated with it (tracking, advertising, etc),

      Closed source, maybe. OpenVPN is Open Source. Even if the original author used something like that, someone would just fork it and remove all the spying. I've implemented an OpenVPN server for half a dozen off-site staff, and closely monitored the traffic on its interfaces. It doesn't do anything except what it should.

    7. Re:OpenVPN by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      No tracking. The catch is that you've got to run your own server.

  23. I've assumed that this was the case.... by 8127972 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    .... for years. That's why I've begun to use a remote access product called the MobiKEY. It is a USB token that creates an SSL tunnel with 2 factor authentication (some sort of PKI based scheme) to your home/work computer. The company that makes this has a managed service called MobiNET that helps to broker the connection so that even Joe Sixpack can connect anywhere there is a net connection. Also, since it's SSL, I don't have to change my firewall settings.

    By using this product, nobody can snoop on my activities and I can do what I have to do in complete confidence. Problem solved.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  24. VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Collectively and out loud: "Oh yea...VPN, thats what we should be using..."

    Learn to set it up in your home and stop whining about people who track you, unless your cable company is tracking you....

  25. They do, do they ? by Joebert · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are theese guys based in Soviet Russia by any chance ?

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:They do, do they ? by justkarl · · Score: 1

      Funny you ask. In soviet russia, You track the hotels!

  26. Probably went something like: by DJCacophony · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "What? This security dialog box is warning me that this certificate is unsigned! Better click 'ok' so I can see my bank account anyways."

    --
    Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
  27. pardon? by rucs_hack · · Score: 2, Funny

    On his honeymoon?

    wow, that's a relationship with a good start.

    1. Re:pardon? by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      Well he and his wife cooperated in tracking it down because they both noticed and were annoyed by it. So, aside from the fact that I suspect you're being sarcastic, I'd have to agree with you. A great start. :-)

    2. Re:pardon? by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      well no, not sarcastic. A new wife, a hotel, I can see more to do then things on a computer.

      Why were they so interested on solving such a problem during a honeymoon? Sounds like an avoidance strategy to me.

    3. Re:pardon? by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      Avoidance? Perhaps more trying to do things safe ;)

    4. Re:pardon? by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      nah, safe means don't get married in the first place...

    5. Re:pardon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why were they so interested on solving such a problem during a honeymoon? Sounds like an avoidance strategy to me.

      Trust me, if you knew these two, you'd totally get it. :)

  28. Re:Some? How about "most"? by Ninjaesque+One · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only reason that spam is alive right now is because of its horribly low cost: it costs nothing, basically, to send junk mail through the internet. That nothing would be increased by about $70 a day for a hotel room with high-speed internet.

    --
    Ninjas and pirates. How piquant.
  29. Soviets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, even the hotels are watching you...

  30. You can track https with a proxy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Notably, I've observed these guys tracking HTTPS URLs, and of course you can't track those through a proxy."

    I wouldn't be so sure about that...

    http://www.bluecoat.de/solutions/performance/secur e_apps.html

    "The solution starts with Blue Coat's patented proxy technology, a core part of all Blue Coat SG appliances. Because a proxy is an active device (i.e., it terminates traffic), it acts as both the server to the client, and the client to the server. Thus, within an SSL session, Blue Coat SG appliances terminate the encrypted connection, inspect the traffic and apply all appropriate MACH5 acceleration techniques to its content, then re-encrypt the traffic and send it its destination. "

    1. Re:You can track https with a proxy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to trust BlueCoat's cert. Easy in a Corp environment, harder in a hotel one where the user gets the mismatched cert error and has to click "yes"... Never mind.

  31. HTTPS tracking by ACMENEWSLLC · · Score: 2, Informative

    >>Notably, I've observed these guys tracking HTTPS URLs, and of course you can't track those through a proxy.

    Um, yes, you can. It is possible with todays hardware.

    Here are a few;
    http://www.esafe.com/eSafe/traffic_solutions.asp

    Another;
    http://www.scmagazine.com/us/products/productdetai ls/94de9e89-b7a1-6d6f-9479-84b866a2ffab/webwasher- 1000-csm-appliance/
    http://www.cyberguard.com/products/webwasher/webwa sher_products/csm_appliance/index.html?lang=de_EN
    "WW1000 has the ability to scan encrypted SSL"

    The days of HTTPS being valuable are long gone. We can look inside this traffic realtime. I monitor & block traffic to HTTPS sites myself..

    1. Re:HTTPS tracking by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      How does this work? Is it brute-forcing SSL encryption? Acting like a transparent proxy and making the client think/spoofing its communicating with the host?

    2. Re:HTTPS tracking by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      The days of HTTPS being valuable are long gone. We can look inside this traffic realtime. I monitor & block traffic to HTTPS sites myself..

      The only way this is possible (barring someone having cracked SSL, which hasn't happened) is through a man-in-the-middle attack. If you try that, the user will get a message on the screen when they connect to https sights saying the certficicate is bad, unless you can somehow get them to recognize you as Certificate Authority by installing a root CA key. You can do that if you own the machines (business environment), but good luck doing that if you don't. You'd either have to break into someones machine, or trick them into installing it.

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:HTTPS tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      monitor & block traffic to HTTPS sites myself..

      Do tell how you do this beyond blocking port 443 tracking to IP addresses.

      I like that link you put on there for esafe:
      Reliance on Digital Certificates is not a good policy since certificates may be stolen, bogus, expired, or revoked.
      Um, yeah.

    4. Re:HTTPS tracking by tengwar · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstand what these devices are doing. They are proxies for the edge of a corporate network, and they assume that the IT manager explicitly configures the proxy settings for his users' web browsers to use the proxy (and blocks any direct Internet access using the firewall). There is an SSL/TLS connection from the browser to the proxy, and from the proxy to the target web site. They do act as a man in the middle, but this isn't in any way remarkable as it can only happen with an explicit request from the web browser.

  32. FreeNX by astrashe · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use FreeNX to go back to my home desktop through a ssh tunnel. I use the local desktop only if I want some multimedia -- I'll start streaming a radio station, then pull up my home desktop, etc.

    FreeNX is fast enough to make this viable.

    You get a lot of advantages from doing it this way. There's the privacy angle, which is a big thing. But you also get your main desktop -- the one with all of your stuff on it.

    And you don't need a really fast laptop. Once it's fast enough to run FreeNX, you're ok. I use a thinkpad I bought on ebay for $200. It's not just cheap, it's from the era when laptops ran cool enough to actually hold on your lap.

    1. Re:FreeNX by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 1

      what does this give you that you couldn't get by tunnelling X via XDMCP over SSH? Doing remote-display stuff is part of the fundamental design of X, after all.

    2. Re:FreeNX by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative
      what does this give you that you couldn't get by tunnelling X via XDMCP over SSH? Doing remote-display stuff is part of the fundamental design of X, after all.

      It makes the connection dramatically faster and more responsive. Like, as usable as Microsoft's Remote Desktop Connection. X is not very efficient. NX does some other things too but that's the biggie.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:FreeNX by Godji · · Score: 1

      Could you maybe provide some information on the stuff you just mentioned? I've never heard of it, but I'm interested. Some links maybe? Thank you.

    4. Re:FreeNX by astrashe · · Score: 1

      I doubt you'll see this, because I didn't see your reply until today. Sorry to be so slow.

      FreeNX is really fast, while X is unsuably slow, even over a broadband connection. FreeNX is the first remote access technology I've used that seemed "good enough". It's also an area where the linux tech is best of breed -- using a linux box remotely with FreeNX is noticably better than using a remote system with Citrix technology, for example.

      It's really, really great. It's kind of a pain to get it set up under many distros, but definitely worth the trouble.

  33. Re:I call bullshit (OT) by Straker+Skunk · · Score: 1

    I will speak from mine: I have no doubt. Nerds are actually very attractive to certain women. They like the reliability and equality. Many have been seriously burned being arm candy for jocks & preps.

    You might be on to something there...

    --
    iSKUNK!
  34. Not all hotels are like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I find it somewhat strange/funny that the majority of hotels having these systems in place seem to be the "expensive" ones. Marriott, Hilton, etc..

    From my experience (a few different positions) in the hotel industry, the less expensive hotels (Econolodge, Travelodge, Red Roof, etc..) typically don't have these tracking systems. The downside is that their networks are usually less secure, because many don't have any sort of authentication outside of a WEP/WPA key. The tracking systems aren't found at these hotels because of the high setup costs (usually in the $1,000-3,000 range) and fees. It's not cost effective for the rates charged at these places, so they often end up with some sort of homebrew solution (kind of like the one I set up at a place -- used WRT54Gs authenticating to a FreeRADIUS server) which is less expensive to set up, and ends up being less expensive in the long run by only having to pay for a separate Cable/DSL connection. As previously stated, the downside here is security most of the time.

    It really turns into a pick your poison-type situation. Regardless, I'd go along with the VPN/SSH Tunnel mentality. You never know what that front desk worker is doing downstairs in their free time.. *grin*

  35. Re:Some? How about "most"? by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    But that reasoning is flawed. You see, all it takes is recruiting one of numerous zombie-net spammers to do your dirty work. No way you're going to get caught. If you go at it from a Hotel room, you're possibly going to get caught.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  36. Not so fast.. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What is this 'Herf' person thinking, signing onto his laptop while on honeymoon?

    Well, maybe he was logging onto Picasa to do some uploading...?

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  37. Whorehousing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a former employee of a hotel service provider, we would certainly store MAC addresses indefinitely, proxy (and occasionally read) outgoing email (and deny SMTP service for the flimsiest of pretexts), and best of all, t2 support would often tail the squid logs in search of the best pr0n. If the company had been in any way organised you can bet we'd have been selling (aggregate only! honest!) data to the first bidder.

    And don't even get me started on the plan to introduce targetted ads direct to the browser on *every page*. What? you think we used squid for performance?

  38. Re:Putty w/ dynamic proxy support and an SSH serve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dynamic Proxy with OpenSSH:

    ssh -C -D NNNN @

    where NNNN is a port on the local machine. Just setup your network applications to using localhost:NNNN as a socks5 Proxy.
    If you are paranoid, make sure DNS lookups are done via the proxy too.

    To do that in Firefox. go to about:config in the location bar and make sure that this is set

    network.proxy.socks_remote_dns = true

  39. Seen this before...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is anyone else reminded of the Babylon 5 episode "Day of the Dead"? Where Garibaldi rigs, in his quarters, a comm channel for Lochley while there's a hot female Marine on his bed waiting for him? IIRC, the marine said something like, "It's a good thing we didn't hook up back then; I would have killed you inside two months."

    But, seriously, one time I was trying to install some packages on my Gentoo laptop at a hotel, and the downloaded files were coming up corrupt. Turns out that when Gentoo went to fetch the files with wget via http, the hotel would occasionally intercept the connection and respond with a page that was just a graphic that said "You are being connected...", with a <meta> tag that reloaded the page in two seconds. Wget, treating the data as binary, just figured it was a partial download and then went to hit the next mirror to get the rest of the file, so in the end, I had files with the right file size, but the first 400 bytes or so were corrupt.

  40. Hotels want to know EVERYTHING by AndSheWas · · Score: 3, Informative

    I work for a certain hotel company, I'm the person who you get when you call to make a reservation. If you have any kind of identifying profile or number, then you're activity is being tracked. Whether you stayed on business or pleasure, who you're companion was, what floor you like, how many beds, on what occasion you decided to stay at the hotel...any information i can gather about you, i am paid to gather. We use an integrated soft phone that is linked with our reservations system. I know what number you are calling from. If you have stayed with us before, chances are you have a profile, and i have your address, credit card number, and possibly how many kids you have. The hotels want your business so badly, they want to REALLY get to know you, and have your favorite flower on the bed when you come in, or if you know the concierge well enough, your favorite escort. So if you want to keep you're personal info "secret", don't earn points towards that free stay, and don't get a profile number. We get paid extra for making these profiles, so watch out for people just making you one, without your expressed consent. It happens all of the time. i watch it happen everyday. I'm looking for a new job.

    1. Re:Hotels want to know EVERYTHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you're not a member of the rewards program for a hotel family, a lot of this information is still retained (but usually not used).

      However, one of the things we used it for at the front desk was comment checking. If you come up to the desk and tell me that your room smells of smoke (and it does) but nothing was noted on the housekeeping logs, you bet I'll check the comments.

      Now I get to look you up by last name and see all the comments made about you by other hotels you've stayed at in our hotel family. If I see that three out of four times, a comment "gst complained rm smelled of smoke", I'd put money on you not getting a discount.

      It's a true story. As housekeeping was cleaning the room the next day, they found a cigarette butt and a plastic cup used as an ashtray in the bathroom wastebasket and ashes on the bathroom floor. Not only did they get no discount, they got the $100 smoking in a non-smoking room charge too.

      Moral of the story? Don't complain just to get a discount. Maybe you'll have a valid concern sometime, and won't get taken seriously because of your history of complaints for discounts.

    2. Re:Hotels want to know EVERYTHING by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Do they also put cameras into the bathroom to catch you wanking?

    3. Re:Hotels want to know EVERYTHING by AndSheWas · · Score: 1

      If it helps them make money, yes - also - watch out when you're in different countries - some countries laws are 'lax on surveillance rules.

    4. Re:Hotels want to know EVERYTHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it helps them make money, yes - also - watch out when you're in different countries - some countries laws are 'lax on surveillance rules.
      • Sell the video to the porn industry. Hmmm, dull, and won't fetch much if there is only one guy alone in the video. That business model would be more appropriate for cases where two men share a single-bed room...
      • Threaten to slip a word to your employer (easy to locate if this is a business trip...) unless an appropriate surcharge is paid. Similar business model may apply if housekeeping discovers a spartacus on night-table.
    5. Re:Hotels want to know EVERYTHING by ross.w · · Score: 1

      Heh, I got a birthday pack in my room with a cake and fruit and stuff once because a Chinese hotel I was staying in got the month and the day crossed up and thought it was my birthday. I was so touched I didn't have the heart to enlighten them.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  41. In soviet Russia... by Zaatxe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hotel Connectivity Provider SuperClick Tracks You!

    Oh, wait...

    --
    So say we all
  42. Fight Back . . . by jgaynor · · Score: 1

    In light of this information, it is obviously the duty of every red-blooded geek to fight back by stealing free porn from any hotel which uses this system.

    1. Re:Fight Back . . . by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      dude, please dont link content-stealing blogs that just links to ANOTHER blog that stole its content from another site. Useless.

  43. Re:Putty w/ dynamic proxy support and an SSH serve by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

    That's my solution as well. I've looked into OpenVPN, but it looks quite complicated to set up in comparison. Of course most browsers do not route their DNS queries through SOCKS despite the fact that SOCKS5 can do that. So the hotel's DNS server can still get an idea of where you're going.

  44. Re:I call bullshit (OT) by redelm · · Score: 1
    Sure. You can get lots by Googling "nice guys finish last"

    Since male reproduction is more variable than female, women are torn between aggressive and nurturing males. Sometimes riskily resolved by cuckoldry. The assumption is that other women's daughters won't find nurturing sons as attractive. Probably an equilibrium thing: too many aggressors don't help enough but there are large rewards if there are too few. A predator-prey cycle.

    "Sperm Wars" [Robin Baker] begins to scratch the surface (if you can tolate the lurid examples). But evolution is not about kids. It's about grandkids and beyond.

  45. Worry; by jafac · · Score: 1

    This was my worry in all the activity to provide municipal wireless around the country.

    Our tax dollars are going to build out networks that are going to be used, in this fashion, to track our activities - probably as a revenue source, by selling our personal information to advertisers (or worse).

    And then, the whole shebang will be sold to a monopolist for pennies on the dollar by crooked politicians.

    Other than that, I think municipal wireless is a great idea. . .

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  46. SSH plus Privoxy by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    Just wondering here, wouldn't you also need to run Privoxy or something similar (an HTTP proxy) on the remote server?

    My thought would be that you'd need to have a remote server (say at home, on your broadband connection), hopefully with a dyndns name, running sshd and Privoxy. Then from your laptop, you'd establish an SSH tunnel that would go from port 80 on the local machine, over the SSH pipe, and exit into Privoxy's input port on the server. Then it would go through Privoxy, to the web, and return the same way.

    This avoids having to actually set up a SOCKS5 proxy that accepts external connections; you can set Privoxy to accept only connections from the localhost, and do the local-remote machine connections via SSH. Although it's probably more complicated than just a proxy, it seems like setup would be easier.

    I think this would be possible to set up, even on a Windows machine.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:SSH plus Privoxy by tgd · · Score: 1

      The latest versions of Putty can provide SOCKS5 automatically -- no need to install anything else. You set up a dynamic port forward on, say, port 12345, and then use that port as your SOCKS5 server. It dyanamically sets up the port forwards for you.

  47. OpenVPN uses SSL by SIGBUS · · Score: 4, Informative

    Note that OpenVPN can be set up to use a TCP connection instead of a UDP connection, and it uses SSL. No need for weird things like GRE that might not make it through.

    You could always put OpenVPN on a port other than 1194 if you think you might run into port blocking, too.

    --
    Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
    1. Re:OpenVPN uses SSL by josecanuc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On a related note: Does anyone know of any off-the-shelf router/NAT device that supports OpenVPN tunnels?

      My company does 4-5 day jobs at convention centers, etc. and we currently use IPSEC with an off-the-shelf "VPN Router" product to tunnel back to our office network for access to fileshares and database data. Often, it is difficult and/or expensive to get hotel and convention center folks to give us a public IP address and they won't do port forwarding, etc.

      I would love to have a box I can set up that will make an outgoing (from the conv. center) SSL TCP connection to the office and tunnel all VPN traffic through that, but I don't (for various reasons) want to run this tunnel on "yet another PC" that we have to carry with us.

      I suspect that I'll end up having to either build a mini-atx-style or other embedded-type system to do this with OpenVPN, but it would be great if there was a commercial device that did this just like the so-called "VPN Routers" out there.

    2. Re:OpenVPN uses SSL by rubicon7 · · Score: 1

      OpenWRT on the WRT54G(S) allows you to setup an OpenVPN server. Convenient, though the throughput isn't spectacular, due to the processing requirements demanded by SSL on the WRT CPU.

      See http://martybugs.net/wireless/openwrt/openvpn.cgi and http://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=1800.

      --
      --- We are not in the 8th dimension. We are over New Jersey.
    3. Re:OpenVPN uses SSL by modemboy · · Score: 1

      DD-WRT vpn version also had OpenVPN and might be easier to setup...
      www.dd-wrt.com

    4. Re:OpenVPN uses SSL by Agripa · · Score: 1

      If you can stand paying a little more, small embedded x86 routers are available for just under $200 new that can use either m0n0wall or pfsense which are php/xml based web front ends that run on FreeBSD. m0n0wall currently does not support OpenVPN but there is a slightly older version 1.21 image available that has it compiled in. Both fully support IPSEC and have PPPoE and PPTP servers. If you need more then 5 Mbit/s VPN performance or 30 Mbit/s router performance then there are slightly larger boxes available which can scale up to handle anything you will likely need. There are general PC versions of both packages that you can use to do testing on an available PC to see if either would meet your needs.

  48. They're partners with Quantcast, who buys the data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quantcast pays them for the data, which offsets the cost of the connection. In turn, Quantcast gets a usage data for people that are in the "can afford to stay at hotels" demographic. (I've always thought this was an immoral practice.) See: Quantcast FAQ: How do you collect your data?

  49. Give the guy a break. by d3m0nCr4t · · Score: 1

    Maybe he married a geek/nerd from the opposite sex and they just checked things out together... In that case: better then sex. :)

  50. Of course I click "yes". by r00t · · Score: 1

    Many legit sites don't bother to get "real" certificates from Verisign or whereever. I'm forever clicking "yes" already.

  51. I've seen worse by straponego · · Score: 1
    I've stayed at one hotel that was intercepting HTTP requests and rewriting them so that if you went to, say, Amazon, you'd be buying with their referral code. Pretty sleazy.


    As others have noted, it's good to proxy. And it's wise to assume the worst about hotel networks; no, any foreign network; no, any network; no, any communications medium. Probably even your own thoughts.

  52. VPN by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Problem solved.

    Shouldnt be trusting another persons network in the first place.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  53. I work for a competing pay to use service. by blanks · · Score: 2, Informative

    For the last 3 years I have worked for another pay to use wireless service.  I won't say the name but we supply most of the wireless service in Hiltons, Radisons and Embassy suites in the united states.

    Thankfully it sounds like they are not even trying to lie about what is happening, and are say they are trying to push advertisements to their wireless users so I don't need to explain why they wouldn't be using a proxey.

    After a user authenticates at a location there is no need for any of this redirecting per page every time a user tries going to a different site.  Any good wireless gateway (and many bad ones) simply track each user using a session assigned to their mac address on the gateway, Nothing needs to be done to track service usage as long as they are active.

    The only reason (and I don't know why they haven't been using this as the excuse) is to be able to claim monitoring illegal web usage such as kiddy porn or illegal music downloads.  We had a few places claim they needed to be able to track this, but we dropped them instead of willingly tracking users for a b.s. reason.

    This is just another case where a company that is charging for a service are trying to make even more money doing secretive and underhanded business practices.

    1. Re:I work for a competing pay to use service. by Ethan+Preston · · Score: 1

      I am a class action attorney. (To explain better who I am and what I do, my firm was lead counsel in the Sony CD/XCP case.) I'd like to speak to you about your situation, if you'd like to do so on a confidential basis.

    2. Re:I work for a competing pay to use service. by spacefrog · · Score: 1

      I won't say the name.

      I'll save you the effort. You work for Boingo wireless.

  54. Mod Parent Up by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    He's correct.

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  55. Privacy Audits are the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT experts should put together criteria that measure objectively how well a given business protects customer privacy (or doesn't). Turn that into a workable auditing process with star ratings (1-5 stars) or Gold, Silver, Bronze certificates and businesses will have an actual incentive to "prove" that they take their customer privacy seriously.

  56. Taking something of value is stealing by Kaikopere · · Score: 1

    Where I surf and what pages I look at and various other tidbits about my personal preferences and habits are valuable commodities. Companies wouldn't be pursuing that information so aggressively if it didn't have any value. So if a hotel wants to offer me free internet service in exchange for letting them see where I go and serve ads to me, sure I might consider it. To take that information without informing me and offering some sort of consideration is just shady if not outright thievery. Charging me for the privilege of helping fill their coffers is insult added to injury. It's crap like this that makes me seriously consider going to law school. I'd love to try a case like this based on the idea that it's stealing and not privacy invasion.

  57. Welcome to the Hotel California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are programmed to receive.
    You can check out anytime you like,
    But you can never leave!

  58. Re:Putty w/ dynamic proxy support and an SSH serve by tgd · · Score: 1

    I wish I could mod that up, but since you replied to me, I can't.

    I didn't know about that setting, and thats excellent information. Hope others mod you up.

  59. Hotel ToS can be very onerous by proxima · · Score: 1

    Depending on the hotel, the terms of service can claim all sorts of crazy things. Whether these are enforceable or not is another matter (IANAL). I usually anticipate that they reserve the right to log just about anything, but the worst I've seen was from a hotel in San Francisco. The service there (which wasn't even free at the time - 2003), claimed that anything you uploaded through the service you provided a perpetual, royalty-free license for them to do whatever they want with it. This would mean that on a business level, this would make this hotel service have the ability to redistribute any work you transmit over the internet, which is absurd. Now, I've often seen terms like this for specific websites (like forums), or claims that you are providing the ISP with the right to route your traffic as needed (which is probably legally implicit in your using an ISP).

    When it comes to where you've been and what you've transmitted, I assume that many places log everything. If you don't like it, that's what VPNs are for. However, claiming a perpetual license to anything you transmit is just insane.

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
  60. Good VPNs don't tunnel everything. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    You might want to check your VPN (unless you set it up, of course). I know that mine doesn't actually encrypt and tunnel traffic that's not destined for my company's servers.

    E.g., everything going to $COMPANY gets pushed through to the VPN interface, but everything else just goes to eth0/wlan0. So when I'm sitting in Starbucks on the wifi, my corporate email would be encrypted but my personal mail wouldn't. (And for the record I'm not bitching here; I think this is a fine setup and I don't think that my company has any reason to tunnel all the traffic, and I don't really want them to.)

    It's pretty easy to tell what's happening: start up your VPN and ping a computer in your home LAN (or something else that's nearby in the network). Then disable it and repeat the ping. If the pingtime drops substantially, then it was being tunneled; if it doesn't change then it's not. Alternately you can also just ping a server in your home LAN and then one on your corporate network, if the home server's ping is the corporate one's, then you're not tunneling, while if it's the same or longer than it is.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  61. Correction due to HTML problem by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    if the home server's ping is much less than the corporate one's

    Should have used preview...Slashdot ate my "much less than" sign.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  62. Come on now... by grishnav · · Score: 1

    Just relakks!

    /happy customer...

  63. Not to sure about that... by WK1 · · Score: 0
    Herf was on his honeymoon when he did this sleuthing. Now that's dedication.

    I think his wife would disagree.

  64. Wait just a sec... by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

    Or rather, that's not dedication *wink*.

  65. on his honeymoon by zobier · · Score: 1
    Herf was on his honeymoon when he did this sleuthing. Now that's dedication.
    I imagine he's not going to be let to forget that any time soon.
    --
    Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  66. Potentially Illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anyone in Australia notices this, check the terms & conditions of use and the hotels privacy agreement. You may be able to take legal action against the hotel.

    Or ask them for your money back ;-)

  67. Re:I call bullshit (OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That author hasn't even read the sites she's criticizing (which teach men to be confident.. do you really want to be with a women who's attracted to guys without confidence??)

    Be nice, be a jerk, be a jock, be a nerd, be shy, be outgoing, whatever, just be CONFIDENT, and LEAD most of the time, and you'll have tons of success with women. Pretty simple.

  68. There are other ways to make money by gidds · · Score: 1
    Otherwise, why would any of these places provide free networking in the first place.

    (Here, have a complementary question mark: ? )

    Erm, OTTOMH: they provide it to encourage people to visit? Works perfectly well for complementary soap, coffee, maps, condiments, magazines, question marks, and all the other things such places provide. They may not be making 'a buck' from all those things directly, but you can bet the increase in customer numbers is improving the bottom line to some extent. (Otherwise, as you say, they wouldn't do them.) But that's no reason to infer snooping on your traffic.

    (No reason not to, either, of course! But you'll need some other argument for that.)

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  69. use a proxy in hotels by talledega500 · · Score: 1