Slashdot Mirror


Undersea Cable Repair Via 19th Century Tech

An anonymous reader writes to mention a story going across the wires about an old-fashioned way to fix a modern convenience. Taiwanese boaters are using simple hooks to fish up the fiber-optic cables damaged in an earthquake late last year. The outage that resulted kept millions of users offline in half a dozen countries around the Pacific rim. From the article: "They work 24 hours a day but the weather can hinder their progress. Walters said one ship is waiting for 30 to 40 mile-an-hour winds (48 to 64 kilometres- an-hour) to die down in the Bashi Channel. The winds have stirred up 10 to 12 metre waves ... After arriving at the scene they survey the ocean bottom to assess whether the contour has changed, and the degree of sediment movement. Then the traditional tools are brought out. A rope with a grapnel on the end is played out, down into the depths, and towed over the sea floor until tension registers on a graph on the ship, indicating contact has been made with the cable. Today's fibre optic cables are just 21 millimetres in diameter."

98 comments

  1. 21 mm? by JeffSh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Correct me if I'm wrong, I'm no expert on this subject, but undersea cables certainly aren't 21 mm wide. Certainly they are run in bundles of dozens (maybe hundreds) for a total width of several inches. At work we had fiber cable installed that has 16 or so strands and it was half an inch thick.

    I guess it's just bad writing and I shouldn't be so nitpicky. :)

    1. Re:21 mm? by PerlDudeXL · · Score: 2, Informative

      21 mm == 2,1 cm (which is more than half an inch)

      But I can image that those fibre cables are bundled and come with a undersee resistant coating.

    2. Re:21 mm? by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 4, Informative

      The don't just have fibers either. There is a central core; usually steel cable. Then they have power feeds for the repeaters. Every 50~100km, they'll have a repeater pod. Finally, they have the fibers and, on top, a thick metal or plastic sheath.

      What's really amazing about undersea cables is that no one outside the industry really thinks about them. Sprint and ATT give everyone the impression that sats take care of most comms. However, the opposite is mostly true. The vast majority of comms are way too time sensitive to allow the the delay imposed by satcom.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    3. Re:21 mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's really amazing about undersea cables is that no one outside the industry really thinks about them.

      That's the way any engineering works if it is well designed. Most people don't think too much about how a hydroelectric or coal power plant works either. Nor do most people today care about how an interrupt controller works.

      It sort of sucks for the engineer because you are in the position where you are only recognized if you frack up (and yes I've been in BSG withdrawal). The best type of award you can get for your accomplishments (other than a big fat paycheck) is for nobody to ever think about what you did. Case in point: everyone remembers the dipshit who invented the square wheel, but nobody ever gives recognition to the genius who invented the round wheel.

    4. Re:21 mm? by TheCybernator · · Score: 3, Informative

      Today's fibre optic cables are just 21 millimetres in diameter. what author probably wants to highlight is that today's ONE optic cable is 21mm thick. Nowhere its mentioned how many cables are lying out there. May be they wont want to reveal it either.
      But given the bandwidth capacity of the routes, we should be able to find it. It cant be rocket science in undersea anyway.
    5. Re:21 mm? by grementas · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, there is also a 17mm version of the cable. Those diameters are for the cable used in the deep-sea portion of the cable system. Any cable layed near shore has additional "armoring" layers of steel wires to protect it from anchors and what not. This armoring brings the diameter up substantially. By the way, there are only either 4 or 8 fibers pairs in a single cable. Even so, these systems transmit incredible amounts of information (10GB/s) per fiber pair. You'd be amazed at how many of these systems are in the water. http://www.tycotelecom.com/SystemSupply/content.as p?page=subSystems.asp

    6. Re:21 mm? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Please mod parent up.

    7. Re:21 mm? by bitt3n · · Score: 1
      It sort of sucks for the engineer because you are in the position where you are only recognized if you frack up (and yes I've been in BSG withdrawal). The best type of award you can get for your accomplishments (other than a big fat paycheck) is for nobody to ever think about what you did. Case in point: everyone remembers the dipshit who invented the square wheel, but nobody ever gives recognition to the genius who invented the round wheel.
      that's a common issue in many professions. for example, in american football, cornerbacks have the same problem. no one notices them until a receiver burns them for a lot of yards.
    8. Re:21 mm? by Hamoohead · · Score: 1

      Now wait just a micron. That's a load of feldercarb and you know it. Now stop playing with your daggot and get to work! Frackin' nugget.

      --
      "If your parents never had children, chances are you wonât either." -Dick Cavett
    9. Re:21 mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually I work in underground telephone plant construction. there are new fiber optic cables that use flat bundles of 12 fibers out there. We placed a few runs of 144 and 288 fiber cable last year. the 288 is about 1" and the 144 is about 3/4". It's amazing what they can cram in those small cables now.

    10. Re:21 mm? by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's tons of information widely available about undersea cables, if one cares to look. In general, though, they just lay one cable at a time, and only lay a new one when capacity is getting low. This may be surprising, but even a 2.1cm cable takes up a lot of room on a ship when it's 10,000 miles long.

    11. Re:21 mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sort of sucks for the engineer because you are in the position where you are only recognized if you frack up (and yes I've been in BSG withdrawal). The best type of award you can get for your accomplishments (other than a big fat paycheck) is for nobody to ever think about what you did. Case in point: everyone remembers the dipshit who invented the square wheel, but nobody ever gives recognition to the genius who invented the round wheel.

      Quite insightful. I'm an engineer for a government agency, and perfection is the expected outcome of any project we have. So, if you take a project, run it well, and it finishes on time/budget/works great - you've only done the minimum expectations of any of the other engineers.

      I get to choose what I work on, so I always pick the most doomed, screwed up, previously mismanaged messes of projects we have. I can't loose. If I fix the damn thing, I'm a hero. If I can't fix it, I'm lauded for jumping on a hand grenade. I can't lose.

    12. Re:21 mm? by emurphy42 · · Score: 1
      everyone remembers the dipshit who invented the square wheel
      And for those who don't, here he is.
    13. Re:21 mm? by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      cornerbacks have the same problem. no one notices them until you snag them with a grappling hook.

    14. Re:21 mm? by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      21 mm == 2,1 cm (which is more than half an inch)

      Actually, an inch is roughly 2.5 cm.

      You're welcome.

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    15. Re:21 mm? by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      No. These undersea cables have just a few fiber pairs (2-4), plus several layers of armor. 21 mm sounds credible.

    16. Re:21 mm? by PerlDudeXL · · Score: 1

      I wanted to point out that 21 mm is more than the half of an inch the parent poster cited.

  2. Did I just get FP? by OmnipotentEntity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyway, with all this wind and water moving, how do they find a 21mm cable 2.5 miles down? A rope that far would bend under air resistance, let alone water resistance. I think some high technology went into this somewhere. Kudos on not making it too complicated. KISS at work.

    --
    "Build a man a fire warm him for a day, set a man on fire and warm him for the rest of his life."
    1. Re:Did I just get FP? by paeanblack · · Score: 1

      It's "just a rope and grapnel"...connected to some GPS aided computer telemetry.

      So they still use hooks to pull something up. Great. I still use wheels when I travel. I don't revel in the marvels of ancient wheel technology just because of that.

    2. Re:Did I just get FP? by Cally · · Score: 1

      Long, superb Neal Stephenson article on laying FLAG. If you don't know what FLAG is but you're interested enough in cables to be reading this far down the comments, you really should read it. I never knew long wires were so interesting until I read this, and it's still a classic I refer people to when cables come up at work (so to speak) - fairly often, my employer's in over a dozen data centres round the world. Oh, the fun we had between Christmas and New Year's Day thanks to this earthquake (one of the DCs is in Hong Kong...)

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    3. Re:Did I just get FP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KISS at Work. I saw that movie in the 70s. Ace Frehley just phoned it in, if you ask me.

  3. huh by mastershake_phd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They can find a cable using just a rope and a hook. And shipwreck hunters with modern equipment have a hard time finding ships when they know where they went down.

    1. Re:huh by amorsen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's reasonably easy to find a cable. At those depths the cables lie directly on the sea floor, and if you run a hook across the sea floor from one side of the cable to the other, you'll cross it by definition. Sure you might then end up some distance from the break, but they are apparently reasonably good at handling that. Such techniques don't work with shipwrecks -- and even if they did, there may not be anything the right shape for a hook to catch.

      Anyway, there's an old but interesting article on undersea cables by Neal Stephenson.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    2. Re:huh by dsanfte · · Score: 1

      I tried to read that and grimaced. The narrative is just terrible. Was he a former writer for Chatelaine or something?

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    3. Re:huh by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      If ships were thousands of miles long, they'd be easy to find with a rope and hook, too. But they aren't.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    4. Re:huh by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      I dont know that they know where the ships go down.

      What they have is the estimate of the location of a ship that
      was with a ship that went down, and an estimate of how far and
      in what direction that ship was. From there, you dont know
      that the ship will go straight down. The various parts of
      hood and titanic, for instance, ended up quite far from each
      other, as I recall.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  4. Get with the program by dangitman · · Score: 4, Funny

    What, are they Amish or something? Every modern company uses sharks with friggin' lasers to repair optical cables.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
    1. Re:Get with the program by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      Ironically the cables are armoured against the sharks (with or without the frickin lasers); so they have to use grapples instead.

      It's been like that for ages. They kept finding shark teeth embedded in the cables.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    2. Re:Get with the program by dangitman · · Score: 1

      How did the sharks know that optical fiber is a tasty snack? I'm chewing on a strand right now.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    3. Re:Get with the program by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      Sharks can sense electromagnetic fields and they often chew on stuff that generates fields. There's power running down the cable; to power repeaters.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  5. No Electronics? by SageMusings · · Score: 5, Informative

    I beg to differ. There are devices known as OTDRs (optical time-domain reflectometers). Essentially, you shoot a pulse of light down the carrier and start a high-speed counter. The difference in refraction (say, a break in the cable or the end of the cable) causes a reflection that is detected at the device. Using the elapsed time, you get the distance to the break.

    Check out this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_time_domain_r eflectometer

    I also saw a documentary on the Science channel about these ships. The whole process of fixing the break is sterile and professional. They use fusion splicers, which fuse the two ends with an electric arc. Fascinating stuff.

    --
    -- Posted from my parent's basement
    1. Re:No Electronics? by rjforster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Disclaimer: I used to build the pump lasers for the submarine repeaters so I know something about this. I also have a fibre optics PhD and have made more fusion splices than I care to count.

      OTDR only works if there are no isolators in the path. (Gizmos which let light pass in one direction only)

      In some submarine cable designs at each repeater there is a return path (ie a fibre loops back) going back the way the light came. I seem to remember this being at an out of channel wavelength (so it passes through some wavelength dependent isolators). Anyway, once you know how many repeaters you do get light back from along this return path you know more about where the break is.

      I was surprised by the comment about the cable thickness for working at 2.5 miles depth. The repeater chassis I've seen are steel, coffin sized, and the walls are 21mm thick.

      I also have a feeling that todays technology is the same as that of 4 or 5 years ago. There hasn't been that much investment (or new jobs) in new submarine cable tech since the dot-com crash. Maybe it's picking up again now but it will take a while to get the momentum back that we had in the R&D team 6 years ago.

    2. Re:No Electronics? by mike_in_nj · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Disclaimer: My father worked for several firms involved in the manufacture, laying, and operation of submarine cable systems in the 80s and 90s. I've seen and handled the cables and have toured the type of ship shown in the photo.

      The cable size (21mm) sounds correct. They are much smaller than the repeaters. I've seen some samples mounted on display plaques so that you can see how they are constructed. Each cable contains a small number of tiny fibers (the ones I've seen had 6). The construction is a solid metal (steel?) core for strength, then some sort of thicker plastic layer around it that contains the fibers embedded within it, then a copper shield layer, and then more of the plastic material. I've probably missed a layer or two.

      On the deep sea floor, that's all there is. Just one of those cables (not bundled or armored) with the big repeater casings every so often. At shallower depths, they can be armored to prevent damage from sharks. (Sharks like them, don't know why.)

      The ships are pretty amazing. They have large bow and stern thrusters and can hold position in some pretty rough water. They have huge, round vertical cylindrical holds into which the cable and inline repeaters are fed in and spooled from the factory, and then fed back out when laying them at sea. There's a giant conveyor mechanism that runs from bow to stern to facilitate deployment or recovery of the cable and repeaters. This conveyor clamps onto the cable from above and below it, but it can also widen dramatically to accommodate the repeaters as they pass through.

      Interesting that they use a line and a grapple to find and recover the cable, but they do have very precise survey maps to work from that were created when the cable was originally laid, so they probably don't have to look very far to locate it.

    3. Re:No Electronics? by tuxicle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sharks like them, don't know why Sharks sense electric potential generated by their prey through receptors on their nose, maybe they detect the fields from the power feeds for the repeaters?
    4. Re:No Electronics? by Dr_DTHP · · Score: 2, Funny

      Disclaimer: I am an undersea fiber-optic cable.

      All of the above opinions and bits of information on me and my kind are completely incorrect. I am insulted!

      Take that, progressively-more-expert-series-of-experts!

    5. Re:No Electronics? by cciRRus · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, these sharks may be trying to get themselves their favorite weapon.

      --
      w00t
  6. Had to be said by elecwolf · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought modern browser technology was supposed to prevent fishing?!?!

    --
    David 'Volk' Mc. Itazura!
  7. "I'm lost! Can anyone help?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, your nearest school. Give it a try.

    1. Re:"I'm lost! Can anyone help?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. What do you mean?

  8. OT: Your nick. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Where can I get the jeff shell? And how does it differ from bash/korn?

    (thanks for your link with the rods information too)

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  9. Actually... by kamapuaa · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, it didn't keep people offline in Asia. It just made international Internet connections incredibly slow. Using the Internet for national sites, which is the vast majority of Internet use, was barely effected. Here in China, nobody at my American-owned computer company even cared, except that MSN chat was pretty spotty for a couple days.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    1. Re:Actually... by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh......friends of mine in Shenzhen were unable to send or receive email for a week and today I was *finally* able to make a call to Indonesia from Taipei. Many, many websites in the US simply timed out. Things are finally getting back to normal.

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    2. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, I would agree that using International web sites was very slow for a while. It's now almost back to normal (not quite)


      Kamapuaa

    3. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, I provide support for a retail chain who has stores located in the Asia Pacific. Since the earthquake 75% of all calls to Asia result in a 103T error. Asia has had no issue calling us although its always fun to try to explain "We can't call you back" without an interpreter.

      Thankfully, it has gotten better over the past week or so. The funniest thing to come out of this is the director of IT for Asia operations lives in Singapore. Every night when I send my report to notify that we still can't contact the stores I get a nice message back stating "Well I had no problem, please try again". It has taken a lot of patience to not reply back "Well yeah dumbass... you're on the same side of the pond. Your calls don't have to cross the pacific."

    4. Re:Actually... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Wow... maybe it's time for your company to hire a new Director of IT for Asia.

    5. Re:Actually... by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      My American friend in Beijing was without internet for almost a week, the week after that he would be randomly disconnected for a few minutes every 10-15 min. All the while he was getting slower than dial-up speeds(0.9KB/s).... in the last week his AIM connection died completely. We keep up via gmail and google talk. This from a connection that pre-break was getting 30kb/s for bit torrents from the US. I'm currently setting up a private TOR server in the US for him to see if he can get some normal speeds somehow.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    6. Re:Actually... by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Where were you and what kind of connection did you have? I live in Shanghai with a DSL connection and I couldn't access most international sites at all for a few days (I made it work -barely- by passing my internet connection through a Japanese proxy after I noted to my surprised that some Japanese websites still worked). It's getting back to normal, but it sucked. Lucky you.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    7. Re:Actually... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Actually, it didn't keep people offline in Asia. It just made international Internet connections incredibly slow.

      +5 Informative???

      It kept plenty of people offline in Asia. The existence of some people in Asia who weren't kept offline doesn't mean that it didn't keep people offline.

      Here in Malaysia, the greater internet was pretty much inacessible that first night for anyone on the main TMnet backbone. It came and went over the next week, and it's really only yesterday that things are more or less back to normal (except with 10% packet loss where it's normally 0%).

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    8. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The company I work for has a couple of factories in Guangzhou, China. They have no dedicated IT staff there so all IT administration and support is done from our offices in the US and UK.

      This cable damage has caused us a lot of problems in accessing their servers and PCs. I ended up having to get a dialup Internet connection to Singapore (from the UK) just to get a route into China that bypassed the faulty cables.

    9. Re:Actually... by fabs64 · · Score: 1

      ugh, you got lucky, I'm in Australia and [unnamed massive company that I work for] has their email server somewhere in asia. Emails all delayed for about 5 hours for two weeks, YAY!

  10. 19th century! Well! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Very charming are the noble savages who use such primitive technology to repair these so-called Optikal-Phybers. Who can imagine what these presumably sacred artifacts mean to these tribesmen?

  11. Re:Metric / Imperial by Kangie · · Score: 0

    Just like to point out.. You are the one that uses "wierd E and R switched" metric.. We southern hemisphere people tend to use normal "re". You should try it sometime. Centre, Litre, Metre.. the list goes on..

  12. For those who dont work at NASA by stoneycoder · · Score: 0

    21 millimeters to inches
    Thats it!? I would have imagined somthing larger.

    10 meters to feet
    Cowabunga Dude! (hey that reminds me, someone is making a new TMNT flick)

    Disclaimer: Yeah, yeah, i know the rest of the free world uses metric, so save your self some typing by not replying to let me know i'm an asshat. yeah, you know who you are... limey bastard

  13. old! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uses 19th century tech, boats are way older than that. a head line missed

    1. Re:old! by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I would have thought that ropes and grapnels would be a bit older than that too....

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  14. Re:Metric / Imperial by PAjamian · · Score: 1

    Can someone tell me how many feet in 10 metre waves? Well, 1 meter is slightly longer than a yard which is 3 feet, so a little over 30 feet. Think a 3 story building.

    What's 21 millimetres in rods? WTF is a rod? Anyways, 21mm is 2.1cm or slightly less than an inch.
    --
    Windows is a bonfire, Linux is the sun. Linux only looks smaller if you lack perspective.
  15. Re:Metric / Imperial by FireFury03 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And weird E and R switched in meter metric!

    Meter == device for measuring stuff. I.e. volt meter, etc.
    Metre == measure of distance (the distance travelled by light in absolute vacuum in 1/299,792,458 of a second.)

    Just because Americans can't spell doesn't mean the rest of the world has to adopt your broken spelling.

  16. No pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No pics no digg! :-P

  17. Re:Metric / Imperial by picob · · Score: 1

    Measuring with your thumbs and feet, that's just so barbaric!

  18. And what exactly would be a modern way? by Josef+Meixner · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When a method works well, there is not really a need for something else, it will only be used when it is superior. So what would those alternatives be, that are cheaper overall?

    A submarine robot repairing on site is probably not possible (I have problems believing it would be able to fuse the fibers), so you only could use it to more quickly find the cable and perhaps make it easier to get the hook onto it as you can see what you are doing. But honestly, how much faster would it be, I guess a hook and the cable for it can just be tossed into the water, an expensive robot probably would take a bit longer to reach the ground. And it probably has limitations on the depth it can operate. Additionally I am quite sure they don't just drive out there and plow the sea bed, they probably have a very good idea where the cable is supposed to be. And don't forget, to find a very long cable is much simpler than finding a wreck. I don't have to find a particular piece, any piece before and after the break is ok, as I can just pull the part up and then follow it, no need to exactly grab the end.

    Also the strong winds and high waves probably would make fusing the cables very hard as well, even if they could bring up the cable. So the only thing 'old fashioned' I can see is, that they use a hook. The rest is probably quite up to date and the hook is simply the easiest, most reliable and cheapest way. Why use expensive technology if something simple is perfectly adequate?

    1. Re:And what exactly would be a modern way? by faragon · · Score: 1

      Arthur C. Clarke explains the problems of recovering cables in the book 'How the World Was One' (which sounds quite similar to "How the World Was Won") -excellent book, IMO-.

    2. Re:And what exactly would be a modern way? by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

      And would they have graphed tension on a rope to tell when it catches on something in the 19th century? That sounds like a pretty modern method to me.

      --
      -Rich
    3. Re:And what exactly would be a modern way? by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

      Just use a spring (or weight) loaded pulley to measure the tension in the rope. add a pointer and a scale . Use the mechanism out of an old fashioned clockwork barometer to give you an ink trace on a paper roll if necessary (I doubt they'd bother). More likely some lucky A/B gets to stand with their hand on the rope and give a holler if it goes tight.

      http://www.powerhousemuseum.com/collection/databas e/?irn=60889&search=steam+engine&images=&c=&s=

      http://www.oldengine.org/members/diesel/Indicator/ Indicator1.htm

      is a little later than that, but similar devices were used to measure the pressure inside steam engines right through the nineteenth century.

  19. Is this newsworthy? by andrewdotcoza · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't want to seem overly flippant, but is there really something significant about mariners using hooks to pull stuff out of the sea? I'm not really clear what the alternatives were. I'm expecting "Man Digs Hole With Spade" and "Tech Professional Presses Distant Button With Pointed Stick" as future headlines. OK. I admit that was overly flippant.

  20. Re:Metric / Imperial by dkf · · Score: 1

    Note that it is only in English that the measure of distance is spelt "metre". Other languages (e.g. German, French) use "meter" for it (Italian and Spanish use "metro" for both). I have no idea why this letter switch happened in English.

    --
    "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  21. Re:Metric / Imperial by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

    Note that it is only in English that the measure of distance is spelt "metre". Other languages (e.g. German, French) use "meter" for it (Italian and Spanish use "metro" for both). I have no idea why this letter switch happened in English.

    This is untrue - the French use "mètre"

  22. Re:Metric / Imperial by Anne+Honime · · Score: 0

    Note that it is only in English that the measure of distance is spelt "metre". Other languages (e.g. German, French) use "meter"

    In french, you write "mètre", and if you're an english native speaker, there's a high probability you just can't pronounce it right.

  23. Re:Metric / Imperial by IDK · · Score: 2, Informative

    Another, related thing:

    I don't know how americans mesure winds, but here in Sweden we always mesure them in m/s, and nothing else.

    48 to 64 kilometres-an-hour would then be 13 to 18 m/s

    And that doesn't seem to be very much, now(saturday morning) the winds at the coast where I live are 18-22 m/s, and it isn't even very much.

  24. -er / -re by Atario · · Score: 3, Funny

    So then we can assume that:

    Theater == facility for viewing movies, plays, symphonies, etc.
    Theatre == the drama and spectacle on display in a theater

    Pepper == a spice
    Peppre == the hot sensation you get by eating pepper

    Jester == comedic performer in medieval times
    Jestre == the jokes and skits he performs

    Adapter == Device which connects two things which otherwise wouldn't
    Adaptre == The quality of the connection being changed (e.g. gender, voltage, diameter, etc.)

    Diameter == Device for measuring diametre
    Diametre == Distance across something round

    Hm, wait a sec...

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  25. Re:Metric / Imperial by djonsson · · Score: 1

    The french word is in fact "(le) mètre", not "meter". If there was a word like 'meter' in French I think it would be pronounced meu-teh and be considered a verb.

    So... my guess is that the English imported the word along with the unit from the French.

  26. You were expecting maybe.... by WheelDweller · · Score: 1

    Superglue? Hairpins? Teleporters? IT'S AN UNDERSEA CABLE. Sheesh...

    And yes, BTW: No one exects the Spanish Inquisition! :) (Sorry, couldn't help it)

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
    1. Re:You were expecting maybe.... by kusanagi374 · · Score: 1

      And yes, BTW: No one exects the Spanish Inquisition! :) (Sorry, couldn't help it)

      What, they actually have cardinals in nice red uniforms tying the cables down with a rack? That's actually older than 19th century tech!

  27. Just lying on the sea floor? by Kopretinka · · Score: 1

    You mean undersea fibre links are just cables laying on the sea floor?! I don't know what I expected, but somehow I'm disappointed.

    --
    Yesterday was the time to do it right. Are we having a REVOLUTION yet?
    1. Re:Just lying on the sea floor? by grumling · · Score: 1

      Yep. And they're just laying in a hole in the ground, too.

      http://www.americantechsupply.com/alcoaloosetube.h tm

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  28. Re:Metric / Imperial by nightwraith22 · · Score: 1

    21 millimeters = 0.00417561441 rods

  29. Making it harder for the enemy to find the ends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My father worked in the cable industry in the 1950s and 1960s. He tells an interesting story from the start of the second world war.

    Immediately after Britain declared war in 1939, a cable ship was sent out into the North Sea to dredge up the German cables, which ran from Hamburg through the North Sea and out into the Atlantic. They found the cables using a hook, exactly as described in this story, and cut through them.

    Of course it would be easy for the Germans to go out with their cable ship, dredge up the two ends, and join them back together again - if they knew where to look for the break. And it's not hard to find out how far along the cable the cut is, as a pulse will be reflected from the break. This had been well understood for a hundred years.

    Knowing this, the British engineers made some sort of contraption full of capacitors and coils that they could fix on to the end of the severed cable before dropping it back into the sea. This would add some extra delay to the reflection, causing the Germans to miscalculate where the break was, and send their cable ship to the wrong place.

    1. Re:Making it harder for the enemy to find the ends by slash.dt · · Score: 1
      Of course it would be easy for the Germans to go out with their cable ship, dredge up the two ends, and join them back together again - if they knew where to look for the break. And it's not hard to find out how far along the cable the cut is, as a pulse will be reflected from the break. This had been well understood for a hundred years.

      Knowing this, the British engineers made some sort of contraption full of capacitors and coils that they could fix on to the end of the severed cable before dropping it back into the sea. This would add some extra delay to the reflection, causing the Germans to miscalculate where the break was, and send their cable ship to the wrong place.

      Wouldn't it have been simpler and easier (and cheaper) to just move a couple of miles and cut the cable again? The Germans wouldn't have detected the break until the repaired the first one and then would have had to start over again. I very much doubt they would have gone to the effort to make a device to stick on the cut cable when there was an easier solution.

      And while the German cable ship is in location repairing the cable, it would have been a nice target to aim at - take out a couple of repair ships and that cable is going to stay broken for a long time.

  30. ~off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the link quote by parent poster:
    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive//4.12/ffglass.h tml?pg=2&topic=(none)

    FLAG (www.flagtelecom.com), a 50'000 km fiber network was bought by a Indian company
    (http://www.rediff.com/money/2003/oct/16ril1.htm) for about 207 million dollars. weee...

    latest news is that they are trying to list them at the
    london stock exchange for 500 million dollars.

    as a previous poser said that good engineering stays invisible,
    well, it might not be so good in the long run.
    maybe we should all chip in for a garuntee future of the GLOBAL internet.

    there's a big difference between owning stock in say at&t,
    sprint and a undersea network /methinks.

    on a side note, i think it's amazing that FLAG was able to go bankrupt
    anyway ... 207 Million seems to be jump change for a network like that;
    just to compare it to AT&T 50 BILLION bid for ... err that other american
    network >>>:P (
    (bell south would have to be 241 times bigger then FLAG)

    1. Re:~off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dons tin foil hat ...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_class_submar ine
      muchos atlantic crossing cable land in that state.
      maybe this sub gives a "new" meaning to cyberwarfar.

      "yes capt'n, we got that fiber cable in sight ..."

      you know the chinese are secretly helping them north
      koreans anyway.
      maybe disabling their internet for a while ...
      1 out of 5 humans is a chinese.

  31. Only 21mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you should have the cable that got away!!

  32. How to repair deep sea cables? by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ive always wondered how, or if, they repair cables which are located several miles underwater and continue for a thousand miles. How would you ever hook onto such a cable, and pulling it to the surface seems rather difficult to me and would put a lot of stress on the cable. I just assumed if the cable went bad, they would have to lay all new cable.

    1. Re:How to repair deep sea cables? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Simple answer: Like hung electric lines, they're built to take the stress. Slack is left in the cable, and only enough is pulled up to make the repair. You don't have to pull the whole thing up, just a couple thousand feet, depending on depth. Oh, and water bouyancy would help too.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  33. "Modern" by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

    Uh, undersea cables ARE 19th century tech.

  34. Re:Metric / Imperial (For all you Yankees) by flight_master · · Score: 1

    160 acres is 80 square rods.
    One metre is 39 inches.
    One inch is 2.54 centimetres.
    One foot is 12 inches.
    three feet is one yard.

    --
    "Free software" is a matter of liberty, not price.
  35. Nothing wrong with old tech by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I've lost track of the number of pre-20th-century inventions I've used just this week.

    Pencil, all-natural-fiber clothing, unprocessed foods, the light bulb, and many other things.

    If it works, use it.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  36. Is thre any other country they can do business in? by heroine · · Score: 1

    30 to 40 mile-an-hour winds, 10 to 12 metre waves, undersea cables that always break. Isn't there some other country they could be writing software in that doesn't have all these problems?

  37. The modern way is to throw it out and buy another by mkcmkc · · Score: 1

    one from Walmart, at least here in the US. :-)

    --
    "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
  38. Re:Metric / Imperial by jbengt · · Score: 1

    A rod is 1/40th of a furlong

  39. could be avoided from the start by john_uy · · Score: 1

    my question is why do all the cable systems seems to pass the same path? some would say that the path is the "safest." look what happened now. it's not as safe as they think.

    most providers are boasting of diversified systems but at the end, all their cables pass through the same area. if only i have enough money to establish my own telecom company.

    a rant (a little off topic) - i'm from the philippines and my isp, then connected to a carrier, globe telecoms has not yet been able to recover much after all the weeks. they seem to rely on just one cable system (c2c.) it took them around two weeks at least to add additional capacity from other networks. i'm also angry at them as they block certain bandwidth intensive sites like youtube. as a carrier, they should not block sites (the slowness in speed would have deterred many from accessing the site anyway.) at the same time, they are not very good in balancing traffic. some of the sites that pass on certain upstream providers are fast and some are very slow to a point of not being able to visit because they pass through congested links. if only i could call them and tell them what to do.

    --
    Live your life each day as if it was your last.
  40. Connectivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This kind of story shows us that we need as much redundancy and as many different technologies to communicate as possible. All of them can be used by the internet, so the chances of getting cut off will keep getting reduced. And I really believe getting access to the internet and with it an astounding amount of information out into as many parts of the world as possible is essential. Hopefully the next OLPC will have some long distance wireless tech.

  41. Sophisticated Grapnels by lahosken · · Score: 2

    I read a book from 1896, Wilkinson's Submarine Cable Laying and Repairing. I was pretty impressed with the complicated grapnels they had back then--capable of scooping up a delicate cable, slicing the cable as appropriate. I was so impressed that I typed up the grapnel chapter, scanning in the illustrations: http://lahosken.san-francisco.ca.us/frivolity/wilk inson/I_3.html

  42. Re:Metric / Imperial by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

    It would be pronounced meu-tay, and would not necessarily be a verb.

    --
    Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
  43. Moderately on-topic question by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    I've always wondered about underseas cables (and haven't really found an answer)... they lay on the bottom, so what happens when you come to an underseas trench? Surely they don't go down the cliff to the bottom of a 20-000 foot trench.... but does that mean they suspend it across? Or do they go hundreds of KM out of their way to avoid trenches altogether?

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  44. Re:The modern way is to throw it out and buy anoth by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Partially right - throw it out, take a tax write-off, put up some PR about how the cable isn't really broken and the customers must have something wrong on their end, then a few months later replace it and acknowledge that there were some software errors that are now fixed.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)