Slashdot Mirror


Woman Killed In Wii-Related Competition

snuffin writes to tell us that a local radio competition to "hold your wee for a Wii" has ended with a Sacramento woman dead from water poisoning. From the article: "An Associated Press interview with another contestant, named James Ybarra, claimed that contestants were initially given eight ounce bottles of water to drink every fifteen minutes, with larger bottles being used once contestants began to drop out. According to Ybarra, 'They told us if you don't feel like you can do this, don't put your health at risk.' He described the victim as 'a nice lady' and that 'she was telling me about her family and her three kids and how she was doing it for her kids.'"

66 of 784 comments (clear)

  1. Mmm... by EinZweiDrei · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What a stupid world.

    --
    Perhaps life really is full of possibilities.
    1. Re:Mmm... by sentientbeing · · Score: 4, Funny

      For those that couldnt hold their water there was a runner-up prize -

      'Hold a turd, you might come third!'

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    2. Re:Mmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, but got pissed instead.

    3. Re:Mmm... by x2A · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah I nearly pissed myself laughing when I heard about it yesterday, but the irony was too much to handle, and I passed out.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    4. Re:Mmm... by welshsocialist · · Score: 5, Informative

      From what I read, no. The winner was Lucy Davidson. She felt the same symptoms the victim felt. See here.

      --
      Support the Chagossians
    5. Re:Mmm... by dr_dank · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, it looks like her family won themselves a radio station...

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    6. Re:Mmm... by s31523 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Probably! The radio station really biffed this one, they should have used cups of coffee. Caffeine blocks the hormone Anti Diuretic Hormone, which causes your Kidneys to go into overdrive. A lot less water would have been imbibed and after 3 or 4 cups of coffee someone would have to go bad. Speaking of... gotta go.

  2. Killed?? by celardore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A woman wasn't killed, she died as a result of self induced water intoxication. It's a difference that means a lot. The headline makes it sound like a sport killing of some kind. Would have been more appropriate to say "Woman dies In Wii-Related Competition".

    1. Re:Killed?? by GiovanniZero · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This title is completely ridiculous. It's sensationalist and makes it look like someone died using the Wii. The womans death has nothing to do with a Wii, it could have been a competition for anything.

      --
      Mod me up, mod me down, do your worst you modding clown.
    2. Re:Killed?? by starwed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's a bit harsh to call it stupidity; water poisoning isn't that well known.

    3. Re:Killed?? by Iamthefallen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      She was killed by her own stupidity

      If we're picking words, then I'd say she was killed by her ignorance, not stupidity.

      If she knew that excess water consumption can kill you, then yes, she was stupid and the station doesn't have a liability.

      But did she know that? Did the station inform her? Did the station know? When she started to feel sick, is it reasonable to expect her to go to the emergency room just for drinking water? And even if she had, was it already too late at that point?

      I just have questions, not answers, but I also reserve judgment until the details are known.

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    4. Re:Killed?? by BSAtHome · · Score: 4, Insightful

      However, ignorance is no defence. Stressing your body always incurs a serious risk.

    5. Re:Killed?? by s20451 · · Score: 5, Funny

      However, ignorance is no defence. Stressing your body always incurs a serious risk.

      Right, so the hell with exercise.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    6. Re:Killed?? by theGil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. The darwinaward tag made me frown...not everyone knew it could be fatal.

    7. Re:Killed?? by celardore · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a bit harsh to call it stupidity; water poisoning isn't that well known. It is a condition that is known by users of the ecstasy community though, especially after Leah Betts, a case that happened in the UK some years back. I've known several people in this lifestyle and they were always conscious of the amount of water they were drinking - even when high as a kite. Not too much, but not too little either.

      The knowledge is out there, just whether you've heard it or not.
    8. Re:Killed?? by AxemRed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree. Most people don't realize that you can die from drinking too much water at once. I was telling my friend about this story, and his response was: "Water? How much did she drink? I have drank 20 beers in a night and not died, and all she drank was water!"

      I had to explain to him about alcohol being a diuretic and about excessive water upsetting the electrolyte balance in your blood. Anyway, the point is, I wouldn't say that she is stupid for not knowing this. People aren't generally taught about this problem because it's very unlikely to happen. The only reason that I knew about this was from another similar news story about 8 years ago.

    9. Re:Killed?? by value_added · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a bit harsh to call it stupidity ...

      Fercryinoutloud, she was drinking dihydrogen monoxide!!!

      Dunno about you, but everyone knows that's dangerous stuff. Been in an airport recently? The terrorists are now using it.

      More info here!

    10. Re:Killed?? by roscivs · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I'm surprised (on some level) that a soldier listening to the station didn't call to say it was a bad idea.

      Actually, some reports are saying that a nurse called in and warned that drinking too much water is dangerous. See http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/16466174.htm for example.

      Gina Sherrod, who competed with Strange in the contest, said her family listened to the radio show, and told her that a nurse was on air warning that drinking too much water is dangerous. Sherrod said a DJ rebuffed the nurse, saying the contestants signed waivers that addressed only publicity issues and made no mention of health or safety concerns.

      For that reason, I think the studio should be held liable.
      --
      ~ roscivs
    11. Re:Killed?? by metamatic · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is Slashdot, people are more likely to remember Douglas Adams.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    12. Re:Killed?? by alta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree with all your statements. Add to this the fact that most people don't get ENOUGH water, and are told to drink MORE water, this just makes it worse. As a whole, I think the population is problably more dehydrated than over hydrated. Look at how much coke, tea and coffee the we (U.S.) drink, compared to just plain water.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    13. Re:Killed?? by jafiwam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, and every poor sap that gets hit by a beer truck chasing his poodle across the road is also an "alcohol related traffic accident". (Unless the truck is empty at the time.)

      The headline is misleading not in that it is inaccurate, but in that it lets someone draw the wrong conclusion about what it is saying. Excusable only if there is no other way to say the same thing without the unintended implication.

      "Killed in Wii-related competition" sounds like she was next to some fat geek swinging the controller around and he hit her breaking her neck. "Wii-related" is only really means "during it's normal intended use".

      The headline is more suitable for Fark, not here.

    14. Re:Killed?? by BakaHoushi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Plus, it's rather inaccurate. By definition, a Darwin Award is given to someone by "helping to ensure their genes do not get passed on." This woman had three kids. Her genes are already out there. So, technically, she's already passed them on... you know, before SHE passed on.

      Geeze... it sucks for her kids. To have their mother die, because of an idiotic stunt in order to make a urine joke. God, I'd hate to see their therapy bills when they get older.

    15. Re:Killed?? by theGil · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Knowledge is not a prerequisite for a Darwin award, though lack thereof often is.
      I disagree. The author of darwinawards.com lays out "Excelennce", or an "Astounding misapplication of judgement" as a prerequisite. Look at the other comments on this page. Many people didn't think drinking large quantities of water could kill you...just not something everyone thinks of.
    16. Re:Killed?? by ocbwilg · · Score: 4, Informative

      But did she know that? Did the station inform her? Did the station know? When she started to feel sick, is it reasonable to expect her to go to the emergency room just for drinking water? And even if she had, was it already too late at that point?

      According to this related article, a nurse called in to the radio station and told them that drinking water like that could be dangerous, and was rebuffed by the DJs. Regardless of whether that was true, it's pretty clear that someone is going to get the shit sued out of them.

    17. Re:Killed?? by BakaHoushi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I disagree. Nintendo should NOT be held liable in any way, shape, or form. If the death of this woman was DIRECTLY related to the use of a Wii (for example, the Wii-mote exploded because of direct contact with something) that'd be one thing. However, the reason for her death was only related to a competition. This competition's ONLY connection to Nintendo was that Nintendo sold these people a system, which they then offered as a prize in a publicity stunt.

      If I offer you a new Honda Civic car if you'll run across a busy highway naked, and you get hit by a truck and killed, should HONDA be held responsible because they made their product "too desirable?" Fuck no. The only people who should be held accountable should be me for being an asshole, and you for being an idiot that listened to an asshole.

      What about competitions that offer money as a reward? Should the U.S. mint be held accountable for people getting hurt while trying to earn money?

      All I'm saying is, people want things. Always. They offered something for free, and someone died because of it. There is no harm in playing a Wii system. In that regard, Nintendo has done their job. There certainly IS, however, a danger in playing Russian Roulette for one. So, Nintendo has nothing to do with this. Only the woman and the radio station. So until a Wii itself hurts someone, and not what people would do for one (and those damn Klondike bars. *MY* great grandmother died because someone shot her for one...) Nintendo's clean.

    18. Re:Killed?? by Eccles · · Score: 4, Informative

      Jim Fixx died at age 52. In comparison, his father had a heart attack at 35 and died of another heart attack at age 42. It may be that Fixx's running added a decade to his life, as he still died of a heart attack triggered by extreme cholesterol blockages of his arteries.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    19. Re:Killed?? by FeTrut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not only is it ridiculous to assume that she had *enough* facts, but the tone of your entire post is insulting and for lack of a better term, soulless.
      There are 3 children out there who just lost their mother due to a competition noone would have expected could end in death and you see fit to call her stupid and issue glib remarks like "Lady 3 - Darwin 0". I'm sorry, but i find that a bit disgusting.

      With regard to her supposed stupidity, the keyword is expected. It's not enough to know that you *could* die from something. I know i could die driving home today, even greater chance because the roads are snowy and icy. If someone veers out of control and hits me on the highway and i die, am i to be called stupid because i decided to drive today? I don't expect to, and neither do the hundreds of thousands of other people out driving.

      It seems a lot of people, and me included, before today assumed that drinking a lot of water results in the side effect of needing to pee really bad.

      Eating competitions are a widespread recognized sport these days, you don't see Kobayashi dying from eating 50 hot dogs, why should anyone *expect* to die from drinking a lot of water?

      The symptoms afterwards were, as far as i know, a bad headache. Well hell, i'd go home and pop and asprin, the last thing i'd be thinking is i need to be hospitalized.

      I guess i'm stupid too.

    20. Re:Killed?? by Intron · · Score: 4, Funny

      Very relevant to slashdot:

      "No one before Tycho had attempted to make so many redundant observations."

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    21. Re:Killed?? by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's better that they drink coke instead of water; at least Coke has sodium in it, to make up for electrolyte losses.

      It's not stupid that people don't know about this, because sadly we aren't taught about it at all, despite it being a constant problem in sports and also the reason for the invention of Gatorade and other sports drinks. Yet again, our pathetic public education system has let us down on something quite basic about our bodies.

      And you're right; all the stupid talk about how we supposedly need 8 glasses of water a day makes it worse. I've had people tell me I should be drinking that much water, regardless of how much food or drink I take in. That figure doesn't take into account all the water in your food, for one thing, and drinking that much pure water without electrolytes is a recipe for disaster, or at least a headache.

    22. Re:Killed?? by mconeone · · Score: 4, Informative
      To Quote the Darwin Awards Rules:

      We are not talking about common stupidities such as falling asleep with a lit cigarette, or taking a bath with a radio. The fatal act must be of such idiotic magnitude that we shake our heads and thank our lucky stars that our descendants won't have to deal with, or heaven forbid, breed with descendants of the fool that set that hare-brained scheme in motion. The initial reaction is that it does not qualify for a Darwin Award. While it is commonly a "fun fact", the average Joe does not know that one can fatally overdose on water. However, because a nurse called an specifically warned the contestants about the dangers of consuming large amounts of water, it may qualify. On the other hand, its not something incredibly moronic, like if she had put a hose down her throat to win the contest faster and died as a result.
    23. Re:Killed?? by niktemadur · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Water poisoning isn't that well known.

      Agreed. I seem to recall the bizarre story of an american woman in the seventies and eighties, who happened to have the highest registered IQ in Mensa (her succesor was Marilyn Vos Savant - two females in a row!). This lady, who suffered from manic-depressive disorder, became obsessed with water and made herself force-drink ridiculous amounts of it. She died one day from what was classified as something like 'internal drowning', which is to say, without being submerged in the stuff itself. And she wasn't even trying to hold it in.

      It's quite possible that this story may be an urban legend, so if anybody has the facts on had to prove or disprove it, please post!

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    24. Re:Killed?? by MoriaOrc · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If you knew you were going to be in a snail eating contest, wouldn't you do a bit of research beforehand to make sure there were no dangers before doing it?


      Similarly, if you were going to hold a snail-eating contest, wouldn't you want to do some research to make sure it wasn't going to put all your participants lives at risk?

      I think it could reasonably be argued that most of the contestants expected the people running a contest, or another public event, would have done this kind of research and so would have ignored doing it for themselves (if it even crossed their minds to do some research). The mere fact that someone is publicly holding a contest where snails are eaten implies that (though in this case obviously not correctly) it is safe to eat large quantities of snails or else the company or people sponsoring this contest would not be holding it.
    25. Re:Killed?? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's why we need to increase our efforts to get the word out about the dangers of DHMO.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    26. Re:Killed?? by avdp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree.

      Let's look at another contest show involving extreme acts. Fear Factor. These people do seemingly incredibly dangerous and/or stupid things: balancing on beams at incredible heights, underwater stunts, staying in boxes with snakes, spiders, etc - either the grossest things. But the truth of the matter is that the venomous animals aren't, the stuff they eat are gross, but safe, they are wearing harnesses at those heights, and there are divers with oxygen tanks ready to give it to the contestant if the first signs of distress. This contest is safe, well researched and the contestants know it, expect it and they have ever right to.

      This station screwed up big time. And you can be sure they know it, just bracing for the civil lawsuit or even a criminal indictments. There defense will be we didn't know, or we wouldn't have done it. We'll see how far that gets them.

  3. Man, even water can kill you! by Derekloffin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I knew you could drown in the stuff, but dying from drinking too much of it? Wow. Didn't know that.

    1. Re:Man, even water can kill you! by x2A · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here in UK there've been a few "ecstacy deaths", last a few years ago, that turned out not to be the ecstacy as such, but drinking too much water to avoid dehydration and overcompensating. You need to replace your body salts when drinking, or they get flushed out, and organs will fail.

      Other risks come from the chlorine put in tap water to stop bacteria from growing - well the bacteria in your guts you kind of need, for digestion etc. Boiling the water first evaporates off the chlorine, otherwise, you're disinfecting yourself everytime you drink it, an accumulative effect.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    2. Re:Man, even water can kill you! by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 5, Funny

      Water--or dihydrogen monoxide--is a dangerous chemical that we treat far too lightly! Water contributes to global warming, soil erosion, and caused the levee failures in New Orleans!

      Become informed of the dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide before it's too late!

    3. Re:Man, even water can kill you! by Pojut · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is why they reccommend when you have a fever you drink Gatorade or some other sport drink...because these help keep your electrolytes high, the chances of your dying from (or being affected by) over-hydration are reduced drastically

    4. Re:Man, even water can kill you! by leathered · · Score: 5, Informative

      Other risks come from the chlorine put in tap water to stop bacteria from growing - well the bacteria in your guts you kind of need, for digestion etc. Boiling the water first evaporates off the chlorine, otherwise, you're disinfecting yourself everytime you drink it, an accumulative effect.,

      Speaking as a former water scientist, this is complete BS. The residual levels of chlorine in drinking water in the UK are minimal, usually no more than 1 mg/l, and are maintained as a precaution to prevent contamination in the ditribution system. There is no way that this amount is capable of destroying bacteria in the gut, and chlorine being the highly reactive element that it is will combine with the first thing it finds when it hits your stomach and render it useless as a disinfectant.

      --
      For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
  4. sheesh by yagu · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is not some mysterious malady. The radio station is off the scale negligent for putting contestants in the position of potential serious harm:

    I'd had this argument many times with a friend about my water intake. I've always known my intake was fine (hint: coffee counts...), but in the course of that discussion I found many articles on the problems one could encounter by drinking too much water.

    I won't claim any person on the street should know the dangers of drinking too much water, but the people putting on this contest (sorry, stunt) could have recognized they were in deep waters with a modicum of research.

    I'm not much for lawsuits, but I hope the radio station that put on this stunt makes significant remedy to the lady's family.

    1. Re:sheesh by yagu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My point is/was that to the casual observer (and contestant), signing a waiver and being "warned" (I didn't see anything in the article to suggest they warned how dangerous this was) would seem a mere "standard" formality and for the purposes of participating in a water-drinking contest, absurd. But, the radio station, as I pointed out, with minimal research should have known going in this was dangerous and not even hosted this contest.

      The only difference I see between this and a contest where contestants drink as much alcohol as possible to win a Wii is that to the common man, dangers and risks associated with alcohol are much more widely known and understood. And, no radio station in the world would get away with having contestants drink alcohol in a similar fashion, waivers and warnings or not.

    2. Re:sheesh by bloodstar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The radio station is the one holding the contest. Drinking too much water is a non obvious danger. But the radio station is the one who should perform the due dilligance.

      Just because we happen to know that water can be dangerous doesn't mean other people do. And certainly expecting a mother of 3 doing a 'contest' that sounds like something fun and silly to expect any danger from the contest is unreasonable.

      Perhaps the most important thing to remember is that generally people, rightly or wrongly, Trust people in charge. Think of the Milgram Experiment as an extreme example. Even though the objectives of the experiment are different, it shows the same underlying principle: people generally listen to people they think are athority figures. And in this case, the contest holders are the athority figures.

      Beyond the lawsuit, I would not be shocked to see criminal charges against the people who ran the contest. Their actions directly led to the death of another person.

      --
      "The bass, the rock, the mic, the treble. I like my coffee black, just like my metal" - Mindless Self Indulgence
    3. Re:sheesh by TeraCo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IIRC (we had a private die in training a few years ago with this sort of thing), the symptoms that you're coming down with water related death include becoming thirsty.

      Yeah, that's an easy one to read.

      A nebulous "quit if you feel sick" warning isn't good enough when she could have done the harm before she started to notice any dangerous side effects.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    4. Re:sheesh by blibbler · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm not much for lawsuits, but I hope the radio station that put on this stunt makes significant remedy to the lady's family

      Well at least they should give her three kids a wii.

    5. Re:sheesh by phasm42 · · Score: 5, Informative
      This article has more details; they say that a nurse had called during the contest to warn them about it:

      During the contest, a nurse called in to the station warn of the dangers of drinking too much water quickly. Her worries were dismissed by the disc jockey, The Bee reported.
      They also mention that the winner felt pretty sick afterwards as well.
      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    6. Re:sheesh by vought · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...besides it being completely voluntary and them telling her that she should quit if she feels at risk healthwise.


      By the time she felt sick, she was liely past the threshold of easy assistance.

      Administering an emetic would not have helped when she felt the onset of a headache - there was already significant edema in her brain and cardiac muscles.

      The radio station is in big trouble here. They should have known better, especially when a kid from the commuter college up the road died from water toxicity almost exactly two years ago.

    7. Re:sheesh by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's worse than manslaughter, it's not just being ignorant when you are told by a fucking nurse that it is dangerous.

      The nurse doesn't even need to be that specialized - any kind of nurse would probably do.

  5. As God is my witness... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  6. In other news... by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, a Kansas City man died after slipping in pools of urine surrounding PS3 boxes at a local Best Buy.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  7. isotonic drink ... by AtomicBomb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Before calling the poor woman a lemming/ a candidate for Darwin's award blahblahblah, I got to ask why can't they (the organisers) supply isotonic sports drink in this sort of competition?

    Water intoxication is more common than many of us would like to think. It is part of the reason why many marathons now supply sports drink in addition to water. Newbies in many cases either don't drink enough or cannot stop drinking until water drains them from the inside.

  8. Her family by inKubus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry in advance:

    Her family is probably pretty "Pissed". This contest really went down the "Toilet". I can't believe how it's been "Sprayed" all over the news. Talk about a "Drinking Problem". As said to the second place contestant: "Urine" luck! I guess she didn't really get a fair "Shake".

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  9. Re:Call the Darwin awards by dewie · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you can't figure out why a mother of three is ineligible for the Darwin Awards, I think you may need to climb out of the gene pool yourself.

    --
    Jurisprudence Fetishist Gets Off On A Technicality --theonion.com
  10. No, no, no by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should have had them drinking Brawndo: The Thirst Mutilator. It's got what Moms crave. It's got electrolytes.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  11. Re:Hold your wee for a wii... by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, who came up with "Breezy Badger" or "Dapper Drake"?

  12. Dangerous! by Aladrin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dihydrogen Monoxide is Dangerous! They've been telling us for years, but we just don't listen!

    http://www.dhmo.org/

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  13. This problem can be solved with legislation by PingSpike · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clearly this water stuff is a dangerous substance that needs to be controlled. I think it should only be available from behind the pharmacy counter, that way kids don't get ahold of it and drink themselves to death.

  14. Plagarising Bastards! by elviscious · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From the article:
    Water intoxication (also known as hyperhydration or water poisoning) is a potentially fatal disturbance in brain function that results when the normal balance of electrolytes in the body is upset by a rapid intake of water.

    From Wikipedia:
    Water intoxication (also known as hyperhydration or water poisoning) is a potentially fatal disturbance in brain function that results when the normal balance of electrolytes in the body is pushed outside of safe limits by a very rapid intake of water.

    What is this 8th grade English class?
  15. Re:They should have... by sokoban · · Score: 5, Funny

    Btw, I still think this is insane. The body should just pass any water it doesn't need straight to the bladder. Maybe you should submit a bug report or take this issue up with the dev team.
    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
  16. Obligatory link by pctainto · · Score: 4, Informative
    Wikipedia article

    Basically, the combination of you drinking too much water and not getting rid of it throws your electrolytes out of whack... you have too much water, so the concentration of electrolytes isn't high enough for your body to carry signals. It happens a lot with marathon runners. Especially runners that don't stop to pee. Many people have died from this even though they were getting enough because they refused to pee out the excess water.

    --
    I think my principles are reachin' an all time low
  17. So... by ucblockhead · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If I have a contest whereby the person who drinks the most vodka in a 3 hour period wins an XBox360, any alcohol poisoning deaths aren't my fault?


    Hey, I have an idea! Let's have a contest where people shoot apples off each other's heads William Tell style! I bet that'd get great ratings!

    --
    The cake is a pie
  18. Re:"Sue into the poorhouse"? by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm trying to understand your comment, and I see three possibilities. Either:

    (a) You believe this woman intentionally got herself killed in order to collect easy money from the radio station.
    (b) You don't believe that the radio station, which set the rules of this contest and provided enticement for people to participate, was at all negligent in not exploring the possible injuries that could result from it.
    (c) Your comment had nothing to do with this case, you just have a problem with lawsuits in general.

    Assuming (c), I feel like I should point out that, given the facts as we currently understand them, this would hardly be a frivolous lawsuit. The radio station was clearly negligent in not exploring the hazards of what they were encouraging people to do and, although you may not think it's fair, they have an obligation under the law to do so.

    Furthermore, the example you cited with the GPS, aside from sounding like an obvious urban legend, doesn't actually map to this situation. Anyone with a driver's license should know that you look before you turn your car, but understanding the risks of this sort of contest would require some basic medical training. It is therefore reasonable to expect a driver to look before turning and not reasonable to expect the average person to understand the health risks of this sort of activity.

    Which is, ultimately, why we as a society have lawsuits like this. The radio station was obligated to do their due-diligence before enticing people into this behavior. And that's why they're going to get clobbered by the lawsuit that will come from this.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  19. Gatorade? by HunterZ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why the heck didn't they use Gatorade instead of water?

    --
    Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
    1. Re:Gatorade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why is this modded funny?

      There are two ways that Gatorade (or Powerade or most any sports drink) would be vastly superior to water. First, the sugar content in a sports drink raises the blood sugar, causing a feeling of satiation. It would be far more difficult to consume two liters of a sports drink than two liters of water (the amount that the lady drank). It's somewhat self-regulating. Second, the isotonic solution wouldn't disrupt the balance in electrolytes, which is the cause of death for this lady.

      The use of Gatorade would be safer, by far.

  20. There is a middle voice by tepples · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry, may be wrong here, but I thought passive (voice) verbs occurred when the subject of the sentence was not the one committing the action. To say that, "She died." is to say that she was the one undertaking the dying action, which is an action

    "She died" is middle voice, as are many other intransitive verbs in English. The active and passive voices of this clause are "She killed" and "She was killed". The forms "killed" vs. "died" show suppletion per voice in the same way that "go" vs. "went" show suppletion per tense.

  21. Complain to Their Advertisers by RedSynapse · · Score: 5, Informative
    The KDND website has a list of all the companies that advertise with them.

    I've put together the following email addresses of KDND's sponsors, so if you think that the folks at KDND are a bunch of negligent twits who probably don't deserve their advertising dollars then why not email these companies and let them know?

    Info@urban-body.com, hr@wyotech.com, smichaels@sierracollege.edu, foundation@sierracollege.edu, marc.goff@US.REDBULL.COM, cs_online@albertsons.com, lgradisher@jewels.com, mediarelations@officedepot.com, communityrelations@officedepot.com, corpcsf@wellsfargo.com, home.pa-newsroom.168d00@statefarm.com, admin@PowerTripBev.com, kburns@ckr.com, chopkins@ckr.com, customerservice@partsamerica.com, oshgift@osh.com, customerservice@tillys.com, info@heald.edu, info@louderlaw.com, dale@sleeptrain.com, webmaster@NissanUSA.com, joseph.l.goode@bankofamerica.com You can also contact KDND's general sales manager at fhormell@entercom.com

  22. Re:Scumbag by x2A · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "You find this so funny you pissed yourself?"

    Actually it was just another play on the 'wii' bit... seriously, you can't actually pass out from too much irony ya know.

    "Then you moan and cry about the moderation you got from your sorry ass comment?"

    Troll, flamebait, overrated, I would have been fine with. But off topic? It's just not true.

    "I hope when a moment of extreme sorrow comes into your life"

    Been there, done that. Everyone deals with things in different ways dude, and death, being one of the hardest things to deal with, introduces even wider ways of being dealt with than most other things we experience. You can't spend your whole life crying, you get nowhere, and may as well not be alive yourself. So you laugh, about some funny word or whatever, it doesn't matter, and hope it does make you insensitive, at least a little more than you'd usually be, because you can't cope if you soak up every little bad thing that happens.

    It doesn't make you an arsehole, it just means you're trying to survive the best you can in a world where shit happens.

    You'll understand as you get older. Or you'll get crushed by the weight of the world.

    --
    The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia