Slashdot Mirror


Walking Molecule Now Carries Packages

Roland Piquepaille writes "Chemists from the University of California at Riverside designed two years ago a molecule which could move straight on a flat surface — a nano-walker if you wish. Now, they've found a way to force this walking molecule to carry packages. The nano-worker can now carry two CO2 molecules. And like yourself when you carry two heavy bags, this nano-worker is slower when it carries other molecules. The researchers think their discovery will lead to reliable ways of carrying molecules, an equivalent of the conveyor belts in today's factories."

108 comments

  1. Carry me home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just let me know when they can carry me home from the bar- then it'll mean something to me.

  2. Energy Source? by eluusive · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What powers this thing?

    1. Re:Energy Source? by William_Lee · · Score: 5, Informative

      What powers this thing?

      From a previous article on the walker:

      "Activated by heat or the nudge of a scanning tunneling microscope tip, DTA will pull up one foot, put down the other, and thus walk in a straight line across a flat surface. The planted foot not only supplies support but also keeps the body of the molecule from veering or stumbling off course."

    2. Re:Energy Source? by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Kitten hearts.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    3. Re:Energy Source? by ThePopeLayton · · Score: 2, Informative

      Probably ATP, which powers about 90% of the biochemical energy dependent reactions.
      Some reactions require GTP, CTP, or UTP. These other nucleotide tri-phosphates are used much less and only for very specific functions, so it could be one of these but I would bet against them. Other possible sources of energy are: concentration gradients, membrane potentials, pH gradients, etc... There are many many different sources of energy in the biochemical world, however for most biological reactions ATP is the energy source of choice.

    4. Re:Energy Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chuck Norris eats those Walkers for breakfast.

      There can be only one true Walker.

    5. Re:Energy Source? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not ants. The Anteaters are UC Irvine.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:Energy Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There can be only one true Walker. George 'Texas ranger' Bush?
    7. Re:Energy Source? by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      yes, now get back to work... nano-workers

      before we dock your nano-pay

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
    8. Re:Energy Source? by rthille · · Score: 1


      Yeah, if the molecule was developed at UCI, it would make the Zot! sound :-)

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    9. Re:Energy Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that you are trying to be helpful, but what the hell is ATP, GTP, CTP, or UTP????

    10. Re:Energy Source? by rtjohn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There can be only one true Walker.

      George 'Texas retard' Bush?

      here i fixed it for you.

    11. Re:Energy Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ad revenue to Roland's spam site, of course.

    12. Re:Energy Source? by ThePopeLayton · · Score: 1

      Adenosine Tri Phosphate, think of it as Gasoline for cells, virtually all chemical reactions are driven by ATP. Here is a link to the wikipedia article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adenosine_triphosphat e

    13. Re:Energy Source? by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know stuff all about this, but here is an awesome animation from some Harvard microbologists showing the molecules that are walking around the inside of every cell. Actually, running would be a better term since the animation is much slower than real life.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    14. Re:Energy Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "will pull up one foot, put down the other"


      Sounds like the world's smallest slapstick routine to me.

    15. Re:Energy Source? by TheClam · · Score: 1

      'Chemical', eh? I think you misspelled 'biological'.

    16. Re:Energy Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What powers this thing? The whip.
  3. Enjoy It While It Lasts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They'll unionize & all your research will be useless and futile against their nano-unions.

    1. Re:Enjoy It While It Lasts by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      I hope those suckers enjoy living on the nano-reservations! We're not gonna honor those bogus nano-treaties.

    2. Re:Enjoy It While It Lasts by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 5, Funny

      >They'll unionize & all your research will be useless and futile against their nano-unions.

      Gives new meaning to the phrase, "All your base (pairs) are belong to us."
      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    3. Re:Enjoy It While It Lasts by frieza79 · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm sure if that happens, we can just use Indian or Chinese molecules.
      I bet they would be happy to do it, and they wont even slow down!

    4. Re:Enjoy It While It Lasts by eclectro · · Score: 1

      More importantly, how do we stop them at the borders and check their bags?

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    5. Re:Enjoy It While It Lasts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those water molecules will work for next to nothing, and can transport large objects incredibly fast. Same goes for oxygen.

    6. Re:Enjoy It While It Lasts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Since these molecules actually do something, it seems unlikely they'll form a union.

    7. Re:Enjoy It While It Lasts by pikapp159 · · Score: 1

      "the nano-worker can now carry two CO2 molecules"

      Our new solution to global warming: an army of nano-workers carrying off all the CO2 greenhouse gas molecules.

      Hooray... Once they are finish, maybe we can stop threatening people that have differing views to extent of man's contribution to climate change.

    8. Re:Enjoy It While It Lasts by kerrbear · · Score: 1

      all your research will be useless and futile against their nano-unions

      Molocules can't unionize, they're just dumb molocules. However, the researches will have to deal with the legal dept. of the SPCM* after having forced them to do back-breaking labor.

      *It'll come to you

  4. perfect for the mob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Think of the organized crime opportunities! Yeah stuff in the warehouse does really just walk off.
    Though if walkers get a collective consciousness it would self-organized crime.

  5. It's only a matter of time by dedazo · · Score: 1

    Has the molecule indicated he wants to form a union?

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    1. Re:It's only a matter of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Has the molecule indicated he wants to form a union?
      How could you tell if it was a he or a she?
    2. Re:It's only a matter of time by ThePopeLayton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you could always look in between the legs

    3. Re:It's only a matter of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's carrying packages---must have been shopping = she

      If it has a package = he

  6. Star Wars, Episode 7... by Excelcia · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Cutbacks have forced us to introduce the Imperial Nanowalker"

    1. Re:Star Wars, Episode 7... by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      Good one : )

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
  7. Roland Piquepaille article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an article submitted by Roland Piquepaille.

  8. Re:Where's the power supply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They get up really, really early.

  9. Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but can it carry Astatine Ununoctium Nitrogen (AtUuoN)?

  10. Next step... by CODiNE · · Score: 2, Funny

    Teaching them to drive nano-trucks and get signatures on a clip-board.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Next step... by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      Or getting them to say "paper or plastic?"

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  11. only 2 molecules? by Zeek40 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So what's the big deal? I can carry a lot more than two C02 molecules around and make turns and my parents are still kicking themselves for creating me, why should these scientists be proud of their inferior creation?

    1. Re:only 2 molecules? by ThePopeLayton · · Score: 1

      Inferior creation? Do you do what your creators ask? Moving two molecules of C02 isn't much but at least the little guy is obedient.

    2. Re:only 2 molecules? by MarkGriz · · Score: 3, Funny

      "So what's the big deal? I can carry a lot more than two C02 molecules around and make turns and my parents are still kicking themselves for creating me, why should these scientists be proud of their inferior creation?"

      Apparently, this molecule moved out of the basement some time ago.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  12. Lemmings by AutopsyReport · · Score: 2, Funny

    For the non-scientific among us, think Lemmings, only less suicidal.

    --

    For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    1. Re:Lemmings by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

      little bit OT, but just so you know lemmings aren't suicidal

    2. Re:Lemmings by AutopsyReport · · Score: 1

      Completely off-topic because I was talking about the Lemmings video game :)

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

  13. When it absolutely, positively... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...can take millions of years to be there on time and weighs less then a very small molecule, let University of California at Riverside work for you.

  14. Re:Where's the power supply? by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you have complaints about the article, why did you post it?

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  15. What to call them? by greenguy · · Score: 1

    a nano-walker if you wish.

    I don't. Now what?

    --
    What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
  16. Small joke . . . by shrike99 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "What did the first nano-walker water molecule say to the second nano-walker water molecule who'd just tripped while carrying his load of CO2?" "Up and ATOM Mister!". (sorry. been a long day)

    --
    "Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life." Terry Pratchet
    1. Re:Small joke . . . by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

      Sorry, all I could think of after that joke was this

      Acting coach: Up and atom!
      Rainier Wolfcastle: (in heavy German accent) Up and at them!
      Acting coach: Up and atom!
      Wolfcastle: Up and at them!
      Acting coach: Up and atom!
      Wolfcastle: Up and at them!
      Acting coach: *Sigh.* Better.

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    2. Re:Small joke . . . by Zabu · · Score: 0

      What did the first nano-walker molecule say to the second molecule? Nothing, he was under alot of pressure delivering a supercritical package.

      --
      It's all good.
    3. Re:Small joke . . . by not-enough-info · · Score: 1

      Up and AT THEM!</reiner>

      --
      ---k--
      </stupid>
  17. New tag by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've started a new tag, just for this article: piquepaille. The idea is to warn everybody that it's Just Another Slashvertizement.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
    1. Re:New tag by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually if you would have taken the time to mouseover the link you would have seen that it didn't go to his blog or column, it went to the university's website. Not that I'm a huge Roland fan, but your statement is just flat out wrong.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    2. Re:New tag by IcyHando'Death · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, I do happen to be a Rolland fan. Someone please mod the parent off-topic.

      Not only have I found Rolland Piquepaille's submissions over the years to be consistently interesting and informative, but he has long since dropped the one practice that anybody could gripe about with any legitimacy, the links to his own summaries of the articles.

      What could anybody possibly find to criticize in any of his recent submissions?

    3. Re:New tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      His name is permanently sullied by his ad-whoring. I no longer trust any of his links. I don't think this is unreasonable.

      Once you sell your good name, you cannot buy it back.

    4. Re:New tag by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      I agree with a lot of what you said. The summaries are great. I hate reading an article summary and the ghoing to teh actual article and teh first paragraph is word for word what I just read. So yeah I do like Roland's submissions on taht point, plus it's not something that you just saw yesterday on CNN.com

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    5. Re:New tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ghoing ... teh ... teh ... taht

      Would you please slap yourself?

  18. Queue for... by JamesP · · Score: 0

    Dial a CO2 Molecule!

    It'll be delivered by our own walking molecules!

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  19. Those Chemists.. by Nux'd · · Score: 1

    Those lazy chemists.. they can't be bothered to move a molecule. -_-

  20. it's a slinky! by garyrich · · Score: 4, Funny

    What walks down stairs, alone or in pairs
    and makes a slinkity sound?
    A spring, a spring, a marvelous thing!
    Everyone knows it's Slinky.
    It's Slinky, it's Slinky,
    it's fun, it's a wonderful toy.
    It's Slinky, it's Slinky, it's fun,
    It's a wonderful toy.
    It's fun for a girl or a boy.

    --
    -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
    1. Re:it's a slinky! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we really want to know is whether or not you had to look that up.

    2. Re:it's a slinky! by dontbgay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Totally OT, but it's funny that I know the Log Song from Ren and Stimpy.. and I don't know the words to the Slinky commercial.

      --
      Sig not found.
  21. nano-factories by syrinx · · Score: 1

    Cue the Powerhouse music, as thousands of nano-walkers move in unison...

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  22. Paper or plastic? by cmeans · · Score: 1

    So, what is the nano-walker carrying the two molecules in?

    A nano-bag? Was is packed by a nano-bagger? At a nano-market?

    1. Re:Paper or plastic? by spot35 · · Score: 1

      Could anyone have tampered with your bag before checking in, sir?

  23. What about C8H10N4O? by dupup · · Score: 1

    Well, super, it can carry CO2. How soon can they train it to carry something really uselful like caffeine? And will injesting caffeine-laden walkers help speed the sweet goodness faster to my decaying brain?

  24. Nano SLAVE you mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ". Now, they've found a way to force this walking molecule to carry packages."

    Riiiiiight. Force. Like they held a gun to the petri dish and yelled at it.

    And we'll have nano-insurrections as well, put down by spartian-like white blood cells, nano-augmented themselves.

    It can be some kind of tom-clancy novel, but based in the bloodstream.

  25. Re:Where's the power supply? by BytePusher · · Score: 1

    It seems he's continued to think about it(Some /.ers do that from time to time). Also, he wasn't complaining, but rather asking a question. Perhaps he posted the question hoping someone more knowledgeable than himself would have answers or that the mass of people reason /. would come up with reasonable answers. That's a heck of a reason to post a story on a discussion board, for discussion.

  26. Those interested in Nanotech... by chris_eineke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    should read Nanosystems by K. Eric Drexler. Roughly speaking, Drexler is the father of nanomanufacturing. I bought it on a whim when I read about him in the Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson (of Cryptonomicon, Baroque Cycle, In the the Beginning was the Command Line, and Snow Crash fame). Interesting times ahead.

    --
    "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
  27. yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And like yourself when you carry two heavy bags, this nano-worker is slower when it carries other molecules.

    Everyone knows it'll walk faster if it carries a nano-knife.

  28. In Soviet Russia... by pappas.chris · · Score: 1

    Our nano-mule overlords are welcome to carry you!

  29. Photo of the moving molecule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
  30. All Hail... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    our nano size underlords. May we construct statues in their name. I see them know posters on every corner: Nano Brother is Watching You!

  31. And for those who liked the Diamond Age by chris_eineke · · Score: 1
    the following should be of interest to you:
    SCI FI Channel unveiled a new slate of programs in development, which includes shows from executive producers George Clooney, Darren Star and Mark Burnett. SCI FI made the announcement Jan. 12 at the Television Critics Association's winter press tour in Pasadena, Calif.

    Diamond Age, based on Neal Stephenson's best-selling novel The Diamond Age: Or a Young Lady's Illustrated Primer, is a six-hour miniseries from Clooney and fellow executive producer Grant Heslov of Smokehouse Productions.

    source: http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.php?category= 0&id=39447
    --
    "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
  32. I work at UPS by krewemaynard · · Score: 1

    ...for now.

    --
    I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
  33. Re:Where's the power supply? by Fescen9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps he commented on his own story with some half-baked comment/question hoping to generate even more traffic to his well known ad site, therefore generating even more revenue. This guy has quite the history on slashdot, look into it...

  34. FedEx for CO2. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
    Now, they've found a way to force this walking molecule to carry packages. The nano-worker can now carry two CO2 molecules.

    When your Carbon Dioxide absolutely, positively has to be there over night.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  35. Why slower? by arachnoprobe · · Score: 1
    And like yourself when you carry two heavy bags, this nano-worker is slower when it carries other molecules.
    WHY should it be slower? You walk slower cause gravity makes the bags heavy - but on that lengthscale, gravity doesn't matter! Does anybody know that?
    1. Re:Why slower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why slower? It could be the inertia. If each step can only move the entire system so far before another step has to be taken, the heavier load will reduce the top speed attained during that step.

      But I wonder how good the walker is when it works against gravity anyways, such as up a ramp or wall, or on a moving surface, especially an unpredictable one like skin.

    2. Re:Why slower? by lachlan76 · · Score: 1
      but on that lengthscale, gravity doesn't matter!

      But inertia does.
  36. Re:Where's the power supply? by BytePusher · · Score: 1

    I looked through some of his past posts, but only one that I looked at seemed to provide a link to his website. Maybe I didn't look well enough, but the accusation is not immediately and obviously true(even if it is true). The thing I did notice is that he is notorious. For good or for bad, he doesn't seem to mind much. If he is trying to generate revenue, he's certainly low-key enough that he seems to be a legitimate ./ user to the editors and admins. His website didn't seem to terrible ad-infested either. I can't blame him for shamelessly seeking a little bit of publicity on Slashdot in order to make some money with his blog. If I were I blogger I might try the same thing. Anyway, I suspect his question might have been legitimate, even if redundant.

  37. Derka der! by patmfitz · · Score: 1
  38. Not only that, but now they gave him... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    ...a tiny motorcycle, that he can ride down these tiny paths, and

    Oh wait. Sorry. My other tab's on Linerider.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  39. If these walking ,molecules encounter a cliff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will they all march off like lemmings spilling their hazardous cargo about thwreak havoc on the wee universe they inhabit?
    Native americans used to drive buffalo herds off cliffs. Within their world view it was not considered wasteful.
    Are lemmings the happy medium?

  40. How heavy of a load? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, how many times its own atomic weight can one of these things carry? Basically, how heavy of a load can it take without breaking the chemical bonds in the molecule's legs? And can you spread the load across several of them?

    If you sprayed a bunch of them on the underside of a paperweight (in a way that assured uniform orientation), could it then walk off by itself?

    What is their horsepower equivalent?

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  41. Re:Where's the power supply? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    I looked through some of his past posts, but only one that I looked at seemed to provide a link to his website.

    The links to his website are in his story submissions, and he has posted a lot of them. Instead of linking to the source of the story, he links to his blog which links to the story, basically directing traffic through his typically zero-value-added blog for no reason. Oh, except he gets money.

    It's one thing to link to your own site if it is the source of the story (e.g. any of the various hobbyist projects that show up on /.), but another to link to your own site as an unecessary level of indirection, solely because it generates add revenue.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  42. BOOM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, if you got that molecule to carry something flammable weighing less than 44 protons, you've got a deadly weapon (if its used in large amounts, and provided you have an ignition source)

    1. Re:BOOM by nizo · · Score: 3, Funny
      Yeah I can see it now:


      - Design lil nanowalkers
      - Pave path directly to target with copper. Design another lil nanowalker that walks in front of the rest, clearing debris out of the way.
      - Set the one carrying flammable stuff going, and wait a few thousand years for it to get to the destination. Have a few flaming nano-walkers to let go a few minutes after you let the first one go.
      - Multiple by a few million for an explosion that people can actually see.


      If this doesn't say "DoD grant" nothing does.

    2. Re:BOOM by TempeTerra · · Score: 1

      Hooray! Finally I can get a cushy military job based on my skills playing Lemmings.

      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
  43. Look Out... by ruben.gutierrez · · Score: 1

    ... for those banana molecules!!!

  44. Re:Where's the power supply? by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Informative

    The problem a lot of people have with Roland is:

    1) For a while a year or two ago, it seemed like every other story posted was submitted by him
    2) He used to always link *only* to his own blog, not to the actual article in question
    3) He (used to?) sells his consulting services on how to drive traffic to your website
    4) Despite numerous complaints and comments, neither he nor the admins were listening to us

    Now they're not necessarily all his fault, but all together it lead to an awful lot of speculation, including about whether or not he was paying for his stories to be posted. It was this uproar, when the admins finally took notice, that lead to the "nofollow" attribute being added to the submittor's URL when a story is posted.

    I can't blame him for shamelessly seeking a little bit of publicity on Slashdot in order to make some money with his blog.

    That's just it though - for a while, he was shamelessly seeking - and getting - a lot of publicity. It started to look an awful lot like advertising to a lot of people, some of which pay not to get adverts here.

  45. stop global warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so now we only have to build a ladder into the space and all this little molecules can
    carry away our co2 pollution....

    get your hummers out of the garage!

  46. FINALLY I can reach my maximum fatness by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    I've be trying to become morbidly obese, but this is hard work. If I didn't need to move any of my molecules, that would probably be a big help.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  47. Awwwww by nocookieforyou · · Score: 1

    How adorable! I can just imagine the little thing walking about carrying its little loads.
    I want one!!!

  48. Submit!..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    Someone will ask me how my nano movers are:

              "Belligerant and numerous!

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  49. Data transfer speed? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1
    The nano-worker can now carry two CO2 molecules. And like yourself when you carry two heavy bags, this nano-worker is slower when it carries other molecules.

    Interesting... how does the speed compare to mailing DVDs from LA to New York?

    - RG>
    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  50. Life! by splutty · · Score: 1

    Ow man! I've wasted so much time on that, programming it for tons of different platforms, trying to get useful creations, etc :) It's always been one of the more inspiring bits of programming for me, to be able to make things like this with just the simplest ruleset.

    --
    Coz eternity my friend, is a long *ing time.
  51. iRobot yields to... by DulcetTone · · Score: 1

    muRobot

    --
    tone
  52. Molecular Cellular Automata ("Game of Life")... by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    TFA gave me an amusing idea. It might be possible (eventually) to build a physical molecular embodiment of Conway's "Game of Life" - little molecules running around on a field, combining into 'teams' with different behaviors.

    The molecules themselves could be components in the game, or they could be the 'mules', carrying the game pieces (which would be the information component).

    Of course, hypothetically this could be extended to many other cellular automata.

    They could also implement or be components of what are generally called 'agent' systems, similar to NetLogo and Sugarscape. Perhaps a system based on these could be 'fast(?) hardware) for an agent simulation engine.

    They could also implement certain kinds of information-driven physical processes. In that case I suppose they would qualify as the tiniest 'nanites' (nanobots). Whether there are any practical applications, it would be an interesting achievement and certainly amusing - at least to me!

    (Several ideas in this comment appear to be the seeds of patentable ideas. For the record, if so then I will adopt some form of Creative Commons approach to their use by others. -GB)

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  53. 3D "Life"? by K8Fan · · Score: 1

    When I read this, the first thing that came to mind was a real-world analogy of the classic mother-of-all-simulations - Conway's "Game of Life".

    --
    "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  54. So many +5 funny, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...no wonder! Now the nice U.S. citizens among us can pull some neat slavery-jokes against slaves that never ever will fight back.

    Oh wait..

    I for one welcome our slavedriver-whipping molecular Overloards!
  55. The Science Express paper is expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10$ to view it...