Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Official Vows to "Purify" the Net

Sleeping Kirby writes to tell us China's Communist party leader, Hu Jintao today announced the intent to leverage the economic potential of the web while seeking to "purify the internet environment". He proposes to do this by maintaining "the initiative in opinion" on the internet and to "'raise the level guidance on the internet," thus civilizing and purifying the internet environment.

8 of 321 comments (clear)

  1. Multi talented by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hu Jintao is a very talented man.

    from the article:

    Hu stressed the need to exploit the net's possibilities, while keeping a tight grip. "Ensure that one hand grasps development while one hand grasps administration," he concluded.

    On the internet I thought one hand was for the mouse and the other was otherwise occupied. Its no wonder he is keeping a tight grip.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  2. Well done by grub · · Score: 5, Informative


    Every time you buy some "MADE IN CHINA" shit from WalMart, etc. you help bankroll this type of crap.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  3. The Register isn't qualified to report on this. by It's+a+thing · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone who confuses the Web and the Internet isn't qualified to report about either.

    And anyone who puts a ® at the end of an entire article as if it was a copyright symbol isn't qualified to copyright or register as a trademark anything.

    --
    Staring at a white background [on a computer screen] while you read is like staring at a light bulb — Maddox
  4. Re:They're going to what? by User+956 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know, but it's ironic that they want to "purify the internet environment", while their actual environment goes to complete shit.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  5. Is the Chinese Constitution a sham? by amstrad · · Score: 5, Funny
    From CONSTITUTION OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

    Article 35. Citizens of the People's Republic of China enjoy freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of procession and of demonstration.

    Article 37. The freedom of person of citizens of the People's Republic of China is inviolable. No citizen may be arrested except with the approval or by decision of a people's procuratorate or by decision of a people's court, and arrests must be made by a public security organ. Unlawful deprivation or restriction of citizens' freedom of person by detention or other means is prohibited; and unlawful search of the person of citizens is prohibited.

    Article 39. The home of citizens of the People's Republic of China is inviolable. Unlawful search of, or intrusion into, a citizen's home is prohibited.

    Article 40. The freedom and privacy of correspondence of citizens of the People's Republic of China are protected by law. No organization or individual may, on any ground, infringe upon the freedom and privacy of citizens' correspondence except in cases where, to meet the needs of state security or of investigation into criminal offences, public security or procuratorial organs are permitted to censor correspondence in accordance with procedures prescribed by law.

    Article 41. Citizens of the People's Republic of China have the right to criticize and make suggestions to any state organ or functionary. Citizens have the right to make to relevant state organs complaints and charges against, or exposures of, violation of the law or dereliction of duty by any state organ or functionary; but fabrication or distortion of facts with the intention of libel or frame-up is prohibited. In case of complaints, charges or exposures made by citizens, the state organ concerned must deal with them in a responsible manner after ascertaining the facts. No one may suppress such complaints, charges and exposures, or retaliate against the citizens making them. Citizens who have suffered losses through infringement of their civil rights by any state organ or functionary have the right to compensation in accordance with the law.

  6. Re:They're going to what? by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    > They're going to what?
    >Don't they mean purify humanity?

    Abbot: "Not they, Hu."
    Costello: "Who's going to what?"
    Abbot: "Hu's going to purify the Internet. What's going to purify humanity."
    Costello: "I don't know who or what's gonna purify humanity! Or how!"
    Abbot: "Hao? Who's Hao?"
    Costello: "I don't know!"
    Both: "All your base!"

  7. Re:And this is unique to "Bolshevism" how? by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Controlling the media to present a picture of fair and rational government has been the aim of almost every government/state/ruler in history and it continues to the present day.

    Though, to be sure, one cannot assume that just because governments sometimes manipulate the press, any negative information about a government that eventually comes to light is true. During the reign of Justinian, he had Procopius produce a history of his times which was, of course, laden with remarks to sooth the emperor and avoid ascribing anything negative to the empire's administration. After his death, Procopius' Secret History appeared, purporting to give the "real story" of things, calling the general Belisarius an imcompetent fool and the Empress Theodora an outright whore. Yet, almost no historians believe anything in the secret history, which seems to be a kind of saucy genre of fiction that flourished at the time, and the reliable account is actually in the official production.

    What I find at Slashdot is often groupthink that anything from the government is automatically wrong and any gossipy rumours that come from "underground sources" (who are more appreciated the more they try to look victimized) are automatically true. The world isn't that simple.

  8. Re:Bolshevism vs. Fascism by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All that Commmie ignorance and the Russians still managed to put a man into space before anyone else.

    People seemingly nostalgic for the Red Bear seem to love to belabor the "man in space" point, but also seem to avoid noting that the Soviet Union failed the ultimate intelligence test, when it neglected to ensure its own survival.

    If the system was that good, obviously it should have easily managed to hang on -- obviously that would have been the prime national priority. And yet it did not. Perhaps the take-away lesson is that while the system worked admirably on concentrating a lot of resources on a few key problems, it was unable to manage the delegation of a lot of resources, to a lot of smaller problems. (This isn't particularly astute or surprising; control centralization allows for concentration, but at the expense of flexibility.)

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."