Slashdot Mirror


Outdated Domains To Meet Their End

Dr. Eggman writes "The little used .um internet domain is no more. The domain was used, or rather unused, for US minor outlying islands and the University of Southern California's Information Sciences Institute had grown tired of maintaining it. This announcement comes as last month ICANN began taking comments on deletion of outdated suffixes. Among the top of the list? .su, the internet domain of the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union's .su may prove harder to remove however, as Google still lists 3 million .su sites."

44 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Russia by wooferhound · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia
    The Domain expires you . . .

    --
    We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
  2. Let's Not Troll Too Much Please by mfh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Among the top of the list? .su, the internet domain of the Soviet Union.
    Before we get unindated by a slew of "In Soviet Russia" troll posts, let's think about this domain deletion concept for a moment.

    Obi-Wan: I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.
    The destruction of a domain that is of no use, is nothing to be upset about. But what happens when this motion is repeated on a larger scale when not everyone is in agreement?
    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Let's Not Troll Too Much Please by parasonic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The destruction of a domain that is of no use, is nothing to be upset about.
      But how much effort does it take to maintain a database of three million Soviet Union TLD's? The time alone to register these domains alone would be twenty-eight and one-half man years at five minutes to register. Just to register them. How much time would it take to switch domain names? How much to try to update links? How much to one's clients trying to get to a site that can no longer exist? Tens of thousands of man years?
    2. Re:Let's Not Troll Too Much Please by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then we should try to get as many people in agreement as possible. Maintain the domain until there are sufficiently few (.su's 3 million is too much for me, perhaps a quarter million or less?) and after that point sweep the remaining in to a generic tld like .mis or something else for a miscellaneous domain. I'm not sure how feasable something like that would be, but the least we can do is offer "endangered tld" holders some method to ease into newer or better maintained tlds. We could look at how servers are consolidated in older MMOs to see how they deal with when to consolidate and how the govern the process perhaps. With fewer holders, we could take up surveys of the sites, like some sort of digital geologist and see who are squatters, dead archive sites, ect. and determine if they can just be dropped or shuffled off to some internet archeology project. There's loads of things we could do, but it'll take international cooperation and agreement to bring old domains to a satisfactory conclusion.

      But the Soviet Union? I thought you guys had disbanded?

      Ambassador:*chuckles* Yes, that's what we wanted you to think!

      --
      Demented But Determined.
    3. Re:Let's Not Troll Too Much Please by heroofhyr · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm a little disappointed at the lack (currently I only see one) of "In Soviet Russia" posts under this article. Often they're lame, but once in awhile you see some that're actually funny. I was hoping when I clicked through to this discussion to find some, only to find a single one (modded down Redundant). Sure, they can be rather annoying in irrelevant conversations, but this article is practically an open invitation for people who post the same hackneyed phrases to every article to go wild. Maybe you don't care for them, but I for one welcome our Soviet Russian troll poster overlords. I'm currently checking Netcraft to verify whether or not "In Soviet Russia" posting is dying and will report confirmation later.

      --
      brandelf: invalid ELF type 'KEEBLER'
    4. Re:Let's Not Troll Too Much Please by The_Wilschon · · Score: 4, Funny
      In America, you get inundated with bad jokes. In Soviet Russia, bad jokes get

      unindated
      with YOU!
      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    5. Re:Let's Not Troll Too Much Please by Esteanil · · Score: 2, Informative

      .su domains cost $100/yr. http://nic.ru/en/

      --
      I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
    6. Re:Let's Not Troll Too Much Please by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, trite Orwell quotes unfairly mod YOU down.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    7. Re:Let's Not Troll Too Much Please by sethstorm · · Score: 2, Funny


      But the Soviet Union? I thought you guys had disbanded?

      Ambassador:*chuckles* Yes, that's what we wanted you to think!


      Apparently Yukos (and some others) didn't get the memo.

      As for interesting domains- it.su is already taken, for those who prefer things extra hot.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  3. Um.... by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2, Funny


    And there was no opinion poll on this? (Of if there was, I missed it. I'm just not hip to the California cutting edge news.)

    Now I can't make a site called Y.um :(

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    1. Re:Um.... by thc69 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You've taken it uptheb.um?

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    2. Re:Um.... by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 2, Funny

      But you can get emacs.vi!

  4. get rid of all TLDs by pr0nbot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Suffixes (and host prefixes) were a mistake. We ought to get rid of them altogether.

    1. Re:get rid of all TLDs by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ICANN uses new TLD registration to basically print money, they'll never give up the TLD concept.

    2. Re:get rid of all TLDs by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With a few exceptions, they have pretty much lost their meaning. Few countries seem to have restrictions on the use of their suffix (Faroe Islands being one).

      Suffixes still serve a valuable purpose. They allow us to identify hosts using DNS, pretty handy if you ask me. There may be a better way of doing it but I haven't seen one. mail.mydomain.com and www.mydomain.com could be different servers and so prefixes are handy and reliable.

      The only suffixes that are no-brainers would be www and ftp if they're all handled by the same host. We'll know by the port numbers anyway.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    3. Re:get rid of all TLDs by cyclomedia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The mistake probably wasnt the suffix itself but the assumption that the country was the lowest common denominator between organisations. This is why we have microsoft.com and microsoft.co.uk instead of us.microsoft and uk.microsoft . Many companies do rearrange their websites to use this subdomaining system (as probably does MS) and it makes more sense in that respect.

      We've also had this discussion before about .tel because it seems obvious that telephony should either use an email-like syntax but with a different identifyer: technical.support#uk.microsoft or at least use a "standard" suffix like www/ftp: tel.technical-support.uk.microsoft

      however this doesnt solve the problem about what the root domains should be? .earth.sol may seem like a good idea so we can have microsoft.earth.sol and asteroidminingco.sol but still retain cyclomedia.co.uk(.earth.sol) seperate from cyclomedia.nl(.earth.sol), but cyclomedia.net is just a mirror of the latter and so could be considered naughty.

      in any case the big co's are always going to buy up all the permutations they can, and that makes ICANN lot's of cash.

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
    4. Re:get rid of all TLDs by Abreu · · Score: 3, Informative

      www. , ftp. and mail. are prefixes, not suffixes .com , .net, .xxx are suffixes

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    5. Re:get rid of all TLDs by WoLpH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I disagree, they do have a purpose and a use, however it's not used for the right purpose often enough. If I visit a site with the TLD from my country (.nl) I expect to see a dutch site, if I visit a website with a .fr TLD I expect a french site. TLDs like that have a purpose, however, they lose there purpose as soon as people start putting english site's on .nl domains and dutch sites on .com domains. That however, is a totally different issue.

  5. Re:really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently you "don't any" English either.

  6. .su by Arthur+B. · · Score: 4, Funny

    The TLD for bearded Russian sysadmins.

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
  7. Why not just sell it? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are tons of words that end in 'um'. Why not sell domains there so people can get 'cesi.um' or 'im-a-b.um'? It would generate tons of revenue (just like .cx, .us, and .tv) and would free up some domain name space.

    For those who are wondering, there are only 8 words that end in 'su'

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    1. Re:Why not just sell it? by screaser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because let's be honest...

      URLs like in.fini.ty, del.icio.us, etc are both extremely lame and annoying.

      Don't be that guy.

    2. Re:Why not just sell it? by Scarblac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For those who are wondering, there are only 8 words that end in 'su'

      ... in English. I think it's more common in French and Italian, and probably in loads of other languages I don't know anything about. And other languages do matter somewhat for this sort of thing (see Wikipedia)

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    3. Re:Why not just sell it? by inselaffe · · Score: 3, Funny

      And what will Putin use for his blog now he can't have poloni.um?

  8. New use for .um top-level domain? by adnonsense · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why not reassign the .um TLD to the umming and aahing community? There are many ditherers and the like out there who'd love to have domains like "im-not-sure.um", "let-me-see-a-minute.um", "tum-te-tum-te-t.um" etc.

  9. Bad journalism? by sczimme · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the linked article:

    The Soviet Union's ".su" is the leading candidate for deletion; that'll be harder to strike than ".um" -- a Google search produced more than 3 million ".su" sites.

    The Google results were vetted to ensure those were 3+ million unique domains, right?

    A Google search for sites from only the .su domain returned the following result:

    Results 1 - 10 of about 2,670,000 for site:.su. (0.04 seconds)

    I don't know what folks will do without www.jedi.su...

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  10. Re:What about new ccTLDs? by kimba · · Score: 4, Informative

    Okay, so they've been dropping some ccTLDs, but IANA has Procedures for Establishing ccTLDs. So, when was the last time they created a new ccTLD?

    June 2006

  11. Re:really? by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Funny

    ^speak

    bah, that's why there are editors. Hell if you read either of my two books you'd not have such high expectations for me.

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  12. .SU has an obvious use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lawyers!

    had-an-accident-then.su
    coffee-too-hot-well.su

    1. Re:.SU has an obvious use by sczimme · · Score: 5, Funny


      had-an-accident-then.su
      coffee-too-hot-well.su


      cannot-run-command-as-unprivileged-user-then.su ?

      --
      I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  13. No more .su? by fang2415 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ".su" is the leading candidate for deletion

    Well, no big loss -- .sudo is a much better way of managing things anyway.

  14. Re:really? by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you're heading to "Jumping to insane conclusions land", any room for me in the car? I read his post and assumed he was a grand dragon of the KKK.

    --
    -- Using the preview button since 2005
  15. Not 3 000 000 .su by Jotii · · Score: 2, Informative

    as Google still lists 3 million .su sites
    Note that this is the number of .su pages listed -- not sites.
    --
    [sig]
  16. More TLDs to phase out by Animats · · Score: 2

    It's good to see ICANN doing some cleanup. For the past few years, they've been something of a trade group for domain registrars.

    A few more TLDs could go. .museum and .aero could be phased out due to lack of interest. The entire list for .museum is a few pages, the domains aren't the top-tier museums, and almost all of them are redirects anyway. .aero has an entry for every airport code (try LAX.AERO), but those were put there by the domain registrar to give the illusion of activity and they're not the primary domain name for those sites. ("LAX.AERO" is really "WWW2.LAWA.ORG").

    .biz ought to go as slum clearance. .info probably wasn't worth creating.

  17. the fabric of space time is about to be ripped by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    in soviet russia, that which is operated on becomes the operator and that which operates becomes operated on. it's a well known fact in the slashdot community

    the slashdot community is also familiar with the concept of logical paradoxes, like: "i never tell the truth"... well if you aren't telling the truth about never telling the truth, then perhaps you do tell the truth, which contradicts your statement. the resulting lack of meaning renders the entire statement null and void

    now if we are to actually drop the .su domain, when the slashdot community knows full well that in soviet russia, the .su domain drops you, then won't the void created by this logical paradox create a rift in time and space and kill us all?

    good god for the sake of humanity, leave .su alone!

    because in .su, domain drops you!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  18. But what you forgot or didn't realize by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2, Insightful

    AFAIK, the .SU TLD was known to be obsoleted for a very long time. Think about it, USSR was no more years before web happened. People who bought names in there have themselves to blame for the trouble along with the registrar.

    You're showing your youth here. The internet was here years before the web existed and .su was a valid domain for email "back in the day". Note to grammatically challenged Slashdotters - note the correct use of "you're" and "your" in my first sentence. Read it and learn.

    However, you are certainly right that with the advent of the web that people should have realized that the .su domain was meaningless as the USSR was dead for several years. I took a quick look at a few .su sites and they appear to be Russian sites that are for some reason too lazy to move over to the .ru domain.

  19. 3 million sites? by helgy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Probably 3 million pages, not sites. According to Russians (http://info.nic.ru/st/38/out_1362.shtml) there were 7897 domain names registered in .su TLD by 11/26/2006. And looks like they aren't going to give it up for nothing - .su domain is $100/year.

  20. .su has a legitimate use by tetromino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    .su is designated as the TLD for companies and organizations that have a presence in many of the countries that used to be part of the Soviet Union. Basically, the same sort of role that .eu is supposed to play for Europe.

    IMHO, the constant attempts to get rid of .su are pure politics: "the Soviet Union was eeevil, so we must erase all traces of it from the DNS system". Blergh. These people are trying to steamroll over numerous legitimate users of .su.

  21. Re:really? by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 3, Funny

    .kkk, that sounds like a successful domain idea...

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  22. OK, but... by the+cleaner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...has someone got a link to a list of the ccTLDs to be deleted? I'm just asking because I'm getting nervous, because I have my own site on a "dead" ccTLD, but it makes for a very geeky domain: serial.io

    (...and .io is the british indian ocean territories, before someone asks...)

    --
    Could be worse. Could be raining.
    1. Re:OK, but... by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      I doubt .IO is in danger, since it technically isn't part of the UK, and therefore couldn't be folded into .UK.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  23. Re:email at outdated domains? by kingred · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, you've got it all wrong. They already have your credit card number, so ordering is super easy!

  24. Whatever happened to "Cool URIs don't change"? by xurble · · Score: 2, Insightful

    http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI

    Shouldn't obsolete TLDs just be mothballed with further registrations prohibited?

    It's not just a case of registering new domains for all those sites - think of the volume of inbound links that will break if a whole domain just vanishes overnight.

  25. More about .um by welshsocialist · · Score: 2, Informative
    This is a post for slashdotters confused over .um and the islands they stand for. .um was allocated for the "United States Minor Outlying Islands". The term "United States Minor Outlying Islands" is a catch all phrase that refers to nine islands around the world. Eight of these are in the Pacific Ocean, the other is in the Caribbean Sea. They are:
    • Baker Island
    • Howland Island
    • Jarvis Island
    • Kingman Reef
    • Johnston Atoll
    • Midway Islands
    • Palmyra Atoll
    • Wake Island
    • Navassa Island

    Baker and Howland islands were claimed in 1857. guano (aka bird shit) was mined on these islands during the 19th century. In 1935, an attempt to colonize these two islands was began; World War II forced an end to the project. Howland Island was Amelia Earhart's intended stop on her last flight. They both became National Wildlife Refuges in 1974.
    Jarvis Island was claimed by the US in 1858, but abandoned in 1879 after tons of guano were mined. The UK claimed the island in 1889 and the US claimed it back in 1935. A settlement was started here, but World War II ended those plans. Jarvis Island became a National Wildlife Refuge in 1974.
    Kingman Reef was claimed by the Guano Islands Act in 1856. It was annexed by the US in 1922. It was used a stopover by flying boats in the 1930's. Kingman Reef was transfered from the US Navy to the US Interior Dept in 2000; it became a National Wildlife Refuge a year later.
    Johnston Atoll was annexed by both Hawaii and the US in 1858. In 1936, it was placed under US Navy control. The US Air Force gained control in 1948. In the 1950's and 1960's, Johnston Atoll was used for Nuclear tests, and until 2000 the Atoll was used for chemical weapons storage and disposal. In 2005, the Atoll's cleanup process was finished.
    The Midway Islands were put under US possession in 1867. In the 1930's and 40's, the Islands were used a refueling stop. A key battle of World War II was fought here in 1942. Until 1993, Midway was a US Naval Station. They are also a National Wildlife Refuge.
    Palmyra Atoll was claimed by Hawaii in 1858. When the US annexed Hawaii in 1898, it was a part of the deal. When Hawaii became a state in 1959, Palmyra was excluded. Today, it is privately owned.
    Wake Island was annexed in 1899 for use as a cable station. In the 1940's, a Naval Base was built. Japan had control over the atoll from 1941-1945. Since then, Wake has been used as a refueling stop for trans pacific flights. Since 1974, the Island has been used by the military as an airstrip. In August 2006, a typhoon tore though Wake. Because of this, the island's future use is doubtful. Wake Island is claimed by the Marshall Islands.
    Navassa Island was claimed for Guano in 1857. Mining of the stuff took place here from 1865 to 1898. A lighthouse was built here in 1917; it was used by the US Coast Guard until 1996. In that year, the light was shut off and the island was transferred to the S Interior Dept. It became a National Wildlife Refuge in 1999. Navassa Island is claimed by Haiti and a private claim exists as well.

    For more about these islands, see the CIA World Factbook and Wikipedia.
    --
    Support the Chagossians