UK Greens Declare Vista Bad For Environment
schwaang writes "The UK Green Party says that Vista's DRM requirements will force many unnecessary hardware upgrades. Quoting: 'There will be thousands of tonnes of dumped monitors, video cards, and whole computers that are perfectly capable of running Vista — except for the fact they lack the paranoid lock down mechanisms Vista forces you to use. That's an offensive cost to the environment. Future archaeologists will be able to identify a "Vista Upgrade Layer" when they go through our landfill sites.'"
Linux users probably use more CD-Rs because versions of Linux have come out more frequently than versions of Windows. Think of how many Linux CD-Rs you've written since Windows XP came out years ago. Probably enough to make plastic to make a monitor casing?
or it could be that nothing is found indicating the mass XP to Linux switch..
Free linux workstations coming soon to a dumpster near you!!!
(Worked for my Masters, could work for you, too...)
Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
Why would a landfill upgrade to Vista? Are they currently on XP? Are they even x86 architecture? I could see putting Java on them, for the garbage collection.
Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
As if being bad foor the environment wasn't bad enough, everytime someone upgrades to Vista God kills a kitten.
Since good Europeans would be buying the -N editions without media player, they can't play DRM content anyway!
;)
So why would they need to upgrade their monitor?
--I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.
Windows Vista -- Our OS boots up so slowly that shutting down the computer is an advanced option.
"When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
nah, stallman is god the father, torvolds is god the son, and the GPL is god the holy spirit.
sarcasm:
-noun
1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.