NASA Considers Plans for Permanent Moon Base
el crowbar sent us a link to an MSNBC article detailing NASA's plans for a moon base. The permanently staffed structure could begin construction sometime in 2010, with six-month duty rotations the norm by 2025. Interestingly, the space agency is looking far afield for technical expertise. Consultants on the project include individuals from Caterpillar, Norcat, Boeing, and other manufacturing concerns. Right now the only detail for placement and purpose is 'on the rim of a crater near one of the poles', but the article outlines a few other ideas that enterprising individuals have in mind for a moon base. Besides helium-3 mining and lunar hotels, do you have any good ideas for a moon base startup?
Don't they know that a base on the moon is just going to be overrun by Cybermen? Duh!
If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
Well the Indians are planning on making a moon trip... maybe everyone'll work together on the moon base.
_Vishal www.squad9.com
That's not entirely true. The earth rises and sets in places all around the moon's circumference as seen from the earth, not only at the equator. The effect that makes the moon's face as seen from the earth move a little bit is called "libration". There is libration both in longitude and in latitude. For some points near the poles of the moon, libration in latitude can make the earth invisible at times. Formulas for calculating librations can be found in chapter 53 of this book.
Doesn't the ISS also have six months rotations ?
Mada mada dane.
I presume by "the administration" you are refering to the Hillary Clinton administration, because the article refers to construction *starting* in 2010. Unless you think Bush can somehow manage a 3rd term?
The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
You don't get to space by making budget cuts. With the current situation there is a US rocket company with their most highly advanced rocket motors as surplus motors from the failed N-1 rocket from Russia back from the early 1960's - that's the closest thing available to be able to put together anything as powerful as Von Braun's Saturn V.
I'm sure The Pirate Bay would like to relocate in case the Sealand thing doesn't work out. After all the Moon has the same legal status as international waters.
Commander Stryker will stop this
It's Straker, ignorant loserboy nerd.
Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
Perhaps you meant: Death and Taxes: A Visual Guide to Where Your Federal Tax Dollars Go rather than the domain squatting site budgetgraph.com.
If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
Mass doesn't change, so the opponent will have his normal amount of inertia.
-- To dream a dream is grand, but to live it is divine. -- Leto ][
Uh... no. The most powerful booster rocket engine being manufactured in the ex-USSR right now AFAIK is the RD-170 used in the Zenith and Sea Launch vehicles. Which were designed for Energia, which is more recent than the Shuttle. Those modified N-1 engines you were talking about, the NK-33, are a toy compared to them.