Slashdot Mirror


"Tech Heroes" From Ada Lovelace to Jamie Z

An anonymous reader writes "The Web 2.0 Journal has launched a search for what it calls "the all-time heroes of i-Technology" (its own shorthand for 'Internet technologies'), reaching as far back as to The Countess of Lovelace, though whether or not Ada Lovelace is truly the first programmer is not discussed. As an exercise in reminding ourselves whose shoulders we are standing on when hurtlng towards the 21st-century, richer Web it's not a bad start. Naturally there are sins of omission..."

117 comments

  1. well by macadamia_harold · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Web 2.0 Journal has launched a search for what it calls "the all-time heroes of i-Technology"

    In the search for heroes, they should talk to a Mr. Mohinder Suresh. I hear he has a list.

    1. Re:well by amrust · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are YOU on the list?

      --
      VOTE!
    2. Re:well by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Well actually I think Micah's the only one whose power involves technology.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:well by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Yes, and my shoulders are killing me.

  2. irony of the sites name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative


    a Web 2 "journal" that doesn't even validate and uses tables for presentation (not to mention 20+adverts per page) spread over 18 pages

    if that's what web 2 is all about i'm dreading Web 3

    1. Re:irony of the sites name by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      Jesus, that site is horrifically designed. The first thing I got was an auto playing video, then a floating advert that followed me down the screen.

      I may be wrong, but this strikes me as 'hey, lets make something slashdot might put up and fill it with adverts'. What a heap.

      Oh, and web 2.0 is, so far as I've been able to tell, all about making money, and that means advertising, so yes, expect worse to come.

    2. Re:irony of the sites name by QRDeNameland · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even worse, that crap pops up even if you have Adblock on.

      Despite that, I hope whoever invented Adblock is on the list. My vote for best technology of the "Web 2.0" era, by far.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    3. Re:irony of the sites name by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      I do jhave addblock, which was why it was so shocking, normally I don't see the cruft of the interwebs

    4. Re:irony of the sites name by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Why is that ironic? "Web 2.0" is about hyping "interactive" web applications — most of which are badly designed.

      Can someone explain to me why Jamie Z is a hero? I only know him from reading his comments in the Netscape keyboard resource file when I was trying to get the browser to behave under Linux. These left me with a permanent dislike for the dude: instead of explaining the format of the file, he put in lengthy sarcastic (and misinformed) rants about the "mistakes" made by various Unix vendors in designing their keyboards.

    5. Re:irony of the sites name by jpardey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Me too. I decided to see if it was doing anything or not, so I pop open the sidebar and see it had already blocked about 20 items! I added an exception for the video ads, but I hope I never go to that site again.

      --
      I have freaks! I did something right...
    6. Re:irony of the sites name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a hero because he tells it like it is, without worrying about sparing the feelings of those who are making the world a worse place to live--i.e. RMS, apsies, and fucktards like you.

    7. Re:irony of the sites name by Lars+Arvestad · · Score: 1
      The word "hero" should of course be used sparingly, and probably not in adjunction to "tech", but JWZ holds his place among the Big Hackers, IMHO. Some of his accomplishments, in no particular order:
      • XEmacs. He was one of (the?) main people making a user-friendly version of GNU Emacs.
      • XKeyCaps. This little application has really helped me getting a sane keyboard layout under X a few times.
      • Mosaic. I believe he was the main hacker on the Unix version of the first "real" browser. And one of the first employees at Netscape.
      --
      Reality or nothing.
    8. Re:irony of the sites name by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Don't forget XScreensaver and he is much more social/responsive guy compared to some people at that degree.

      Also one of the interesting things is, his club runs OSS (as much as possible) and he shares the stuff as well as "Club" is much more like an open source project, even deepest details including how to get a license for club is shared as well as the software source making some stuff run.

      http://www.dnalounge.com/backstage/

    9. Re:irony of the sites name by fm6 · · Score: 1

      None of which is all that impressive. XEmacs is just a GUI-aware port of Emacs (I wouldn't call it "user friendly".) XKeyCaps is useful (or was, when he was still maintaining it), but not a major achievement. I don't believe JWZ contributed that much to the creation of Mosaic or Netscape; certainly his comments in the resource files that I mentioned suggest he'd be more of a hindrance then a help in a major software project, whatever his technical talents.

  3. Naturally there are sins of omission... by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, like no CowboyNeal option!

    1. Re:Naturally there are sins of omission... by fireslack · · Score: 1

      How could they forget the living legend, Al Gore?

      --
      This sig only exists because you are observing it.
    2. Re:Naturally there are sins of omission... by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More to the point, how could they forget John von Neumann, Marvin Minsky and others?

      --
      Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
    3. Re:Naturally there are sins of omission... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Be careful. I've had angry responses in the past when bringing up Marvin Minsky on slashdot.

      The 'Artificial Intelligence' people are touchy these days.

    4. Re:Naturally there are sins of omission... by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of Terry Winograd. I also think my friend, Rick Adams qualifies.

      --
      Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
    5. Re:Naturally there are sins of omission... by anomalous+cohort · · Score: 1

      The proliferation of adverts was so offensive to me that I chose not to RTFA. Was Noam Chomsky mentioned? I believe that his theory of formal languages remains to be very important to computer science. For example, what application developer has not used regular expressions?

    6. Re:Naturally there are sins of omission... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marvin Minsky is responsible for most of the hype and non-scientific attitude permeating AI. His contribution to CS is the discovery that hot air attracts large amounts of funding. Make of that what you will.

  4. Web 2.0 Journal? by matt+me · · Score: 4, Informative

    A journal with that name just has to be a joke. Yes I did try to read the fucking article, but it was obscured by a large photograph of a bridge. I guess this was an advert.

    Well I'm glad to see this web 2.0 is so user friendly.

    1. Re:Web 2.0 Journal? by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      I do so like the Firefox Nuke Anything Enhanced extension. I don't use it often, but for web sites like TFA it is nice to have its "remove this object" choice on the right click menu.

      That said, you didn't miss much by not RTFA. I waded through the first few paragraphs, but stopped when I realized that author was in love with the english language but not in a healthy way...

    2. Re:Web 2.0 Journal? by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A journal with that name just has to be a joke.

      Sys-Con Media is known for this sort of thing. They whip up publications devoted to the latest trends, then scrap them when the ad dollars dry up.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  5. They forgot one by TodMinuit · · Score: 4, Informative

    Douglas Engelbart, the true father of desktop computing. At a time when computers were used merely for data processes, he envisioned they could be used in the everyday life.

    --
    I wonder if I use bold in my signature, people will notice my posts.
    1. Re:They forgot one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      So he was the first person to put pr0n on a computer?

  6. History should be treated as tentative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet most people are adamant about treating it as something absolute, regardless of the countless revisions that resurface based on the most valuable thing a human being can possess; critical thinking.

    Was Ada Lovelace the first programmer? Who knows, but more importantly, who would this mean anything to? Who would it favour if she was?

  7. Woaaah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ad gangbang!!!!!

    I can't believe it, gazillion ads on one page (they topped tom's hardware)

  8. Ouch! by JamesTRexx · · Score: 3, Funny

    when hurtlng towards the 21st-century, richer Web

    I think I'll stick to plain HTML 4.0.1 if web 2.0 is going to hurt that much.

    --
    home
    1. Re:Ouch! by CerebusUS · · Score: 1

      Also, aren't we already in the 21st century? shouldn't it be "through" instead of "towards?"

  9. Relax... by mangu · · Score: 1
    I did try to read the fucking article, but it was obscured by a large photograph


    Think of it this way: you were looking at page 1. Of 22. Now, do you feel better? If you *had* read the fucking article, you would have had to click 22 times on that "close this window" button. That's what you get when you try to read an article about the inventor of Ada, the most overhyped language until Ruby.

    1. Re:Relax... by prandal · · Score: 1

      Except that "close that window button" is not accessible if you're on an 800x600 display. And when you try to scroll the page that flipping ad moves with you.

      Consigning "Web 2.0 Journal" to the trashcan where it so obviously belongs.

  10. Misplaced credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My question is: Who has been given credit for things that other people invented? Who are the unsung heros and who are the rip-off artists?

    For instance, I always gave credit for the invention of spread spectrum to Hedy Lamarr (a movie star). Then I found this little gem:
    "Frequency hopping spread spectrum was a public domain idea by 1917. The Germans used it in WWII. Hitler wanted to win by bluff and before the war started, invited public figures from England and the US to see how invincible his military was. Hedy Lamarr, who has similar scientific-mathematical skills to Cher and Edith Bunker, was among one of these groups who was shown the "invincible" communication system the German's had. When the group got back to the US, they applied for a patent and possibly as a joke put only Hedy's name on it. The patent office examiners then, as they are now, are not practicing engineers and are spread over a wide range of technology, they are jacks of all trades and masters of none. They are also short of time to keep up with what is going on in the engineering world or to study engineering history. They only see if a similar patent was issued in the past. Finding none, they issued the patent. This is why so many patents are being issued these days on public domain prior art." The guy who wrote it has several other examples of people who came up with something first not getting credit for it.
    http://www.analog-rf.com/mixer.shtml

    1. Re:Misplaced credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, when I saw this I thought there should be two lists:

      1) those with outsized egos who are relentless at self-promotion and getting ahead

      2) those who aren't.

      The world at large tends to value the people on the first list more, and not without reason. Personally I identify more with the second.

  11. "hurtlng towards the 21st-century" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll give the author the benefit of the doubt and assume he is stuck in 1998. The article link confirms this assumption.

  12. Claude E. Shannon by z-man · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is it possible to create a list of the most important people in technology throughout history and _not_ include Shannon. Jeez, the guy is the father of information theory and digital circuit design!

  13. i-Technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus, I really, really hope that turd of a buzzword doesn't catch on with PHB's or the media. I'm pretty sure I would seriously hurt anyone who referred to my job as being in the "i-Technology" industry.

    1. Re:i-Technology? by freeze128 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, what if you were an optometrist?

  14. ADA ADA ADA by Nyall · · Score: 0, Troll

    Am I they only one sick of hearing how great Miss ADA is?

    --
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification
  15. The mind bibbles, boggles and so on by allikat_uk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How could they forget Alan Turing? The inventor of the Turing test for AI, and father of the modern computer?

    --
    How to make a flamewar in under F characters: I love SuSE!
    1. Re:The mind bibbles, boggles and so on by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      He was not the father of the modern computer at all. Dr Tommy Flowers was http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Flowers . He created Collosus, so in every sense *he* was one of the fathers of modern computing. However he was constrained by the official secrets act to never discuss his creation, so his contribution was forgotten.
      Turing knew how to use Colossus, and did some very impressive things. Certainly he could be assigned the title father of AI, but not of modern computing by a long shot. There are people in america with a greater claim to that throne.

      I know it doesn't do to say these things about Turing. However, while he would no doubt have made far greater contributions had he not been held to secrecy and driven to suicide by the restrictions and monitoring of the secret service, the fact remains that his actual contribution were somewhat limited. Being prosecuted for being gay didn't help much either.

      Its a tragedy that we lost him when we did, and how we did, mostly because of the homophobia of the then UK establishment. I wonder what he would have gone on to discover. Perhaps we'd have got the positron a good deal sooner.

    2. Re:The mind bibbles, boggles and so on by Falladir · · Score: 1

      They didn't. He's third from the end as of 12:27, 04 Feb 2006.

    3. Re:The mind bibbles, boggles and so on by eokyere · · Score: 1

      sorry, but mauchley and eckert got there first, not turing ;P

    4. Re:The mind bibbles, boggles and so on by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Informative

      He was not the father of the modern computer at all. Dr Tommy Flowers was

      It appears they worked together, so it is hard to say. Turing used electro-mechanical relays, and Flowers replaced the designs with vacuum tubes because of his experience in phone systems. Thus, he may have simply "upgraded" the switches to faster technology rather than reinvent the entire computer design itself.

    5. Re:The mind bibbles, boggles and so on by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Turing on the list. Guess you must've missed that one...

    6. Re:The mind bibbles, boggles and so on by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      Dr flowers actually built collossus away from bletchley park, and away from Turing. Not that I disagree that Turing may have dabbled, but he was not there when colossus was constructed

    7. Re:The mind bibbles, boggles and so on by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      sorry, but mauchley and eckert got there first, not turing

      IIRC, mauchley and eckert got credit for the "stored program", that is storing the program in memory rather than wire-boards. But that is a different issue than "first electronic computer".

    8. Re:The mind bibbles, boggles and so on by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Dr flowers actually built collossus away from bletchley park, and away from Turing. Not that I disagree that Turing may have dabbled, but he was not there when colossus was constructed

      But Flowers was mostly interested in increasing the speed via tubes instead of mechanical switches. He was not trying for a revolutionary kind of device or techniques other than using tubes instead. Sure, the difference in technology may have resulted in some innovations, but the concepts were not really different it appears.

    9. Re:The mind bibbles, boggles and so on by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      I was more meaning that he personally financed and undertook the construction of the worlds first computer, and yes, it was him who designed it, he was one smart cookie.

    10. Re:The mind bibbles, boggles and so on by GrumpySimon · · Score: 1

      Flowers replaced the designs with vacuum tubes

      Ahhh.. so he's the guy who invented the internet, then?

    11. Re:The mind bibbles, boggles and so on by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I was more meaning that he personally financed and undertook the construction of the worlds first computer, and yes, it was him who designed it, he was one smart cookie.

      I guess it depends on how one defines "computer". Turing's mechanical devices were considered "computers". They just were not electronic. I guess you could say Flowers invented the *electronic* computer. But that is a different credit than inventing the computer. That credit would probably go to Mr. Pascal. The other invention that is unclear to me is the stored program, where the program is kept in memory instead of read directly off of cards/paper-tape or programmed via wire-boards.

    12. Re:The mind bibbles, boggles and so on by hauntingthunder · · Score: 1


      did they get <URLhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Flowers> who built Colossus ?

      --
      You will never get to heaven with an Ak 47... But A Zu 30 is good for Low Flying Cherubim
    13. Re:The mind bibbles, boggles and so on by Archtech · · Score: 1

      1. Colossus (one "l" only) was not a computer in the modern sense of the word, although it was an important precursor.

      2. Turing's greatest contribution was theoretical, and dates back to his paper "On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem", which was written and published in 1936.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  16. Missing pair by Raul654 · · Score: 2, Informative

    At the risk of stating the obvious, the list is missing John Bardeen and Walter Brattain, the guys who invented the transistor (With their manager, William Shockley, they won the Nobel prize in physics for it).

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  17. from their list by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Andy Hertzfield: Eazel developer and Macintosh forefather

    Jean Ichbiah: Creator of Ada

    Grace Murray Hopper: Developer of the first compiled high level programming language, COBOL

    Jordan Hubbard: One of the creators of FreeBSD; currently a manager of Apple's Darwin project

    Jean D Ichbiah: Principal designer, Ada language (1977)

    Ken Iverson: Inventor of APL, later J


    I've never used ADA, is it really so good that its inventor had to be listed twice in the same list?

    1. Re:from their list by NoNeeeed · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's apt... The first mention was the specification, the second was the implementation body. Welcome to the world of Ada :) Paul (Ex Ada coder)

    2. Re:from their list by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The first mention was the specification, the second was the implementation body

      In the list posted (I, obviously, didn't RTFA), the first listing was as 'creator' and the second as 'designer' of ADA. This sounds more like the first listing is for implementation while the second is for design.

      This sounds like it would be a little bit more appropriate for Java or C# than ADA...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:from their list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it is Ada, not ADA. ADA is the Americans with Disabilities Act, not a programming language - though that could make for an interesting experience if it were...

    4. Re:from their list by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I've never used ADA, is it really so good that its inventor had to be listed twice in the same list?


      Though the Ada language seems destined to be forgotten, at one time the U.S. Department of Defense required that any significant code written for DoD projects be written in Ada.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  18. Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Who Are The All-Time Heroes of i-Technology?

    I wonder how many people, as I did, found themselves thrown into confusion by the death last week of Jean Ichbiah (pictured below), inventor of Ada.

    Learning that the inventor of a computer programming language is already old enough to have lived 66 years (Ichbiah was 66 when he succumbed to brain cancer) is a little like learning that your 11-year-old daughter has grown up and left home or that the first car you ever bought no longer is legal because it runs on gasoline in an age where all automobiles must run on water. How can something as novel, as new, as a computing language possibly already be so old-fangled that an early practitioner like Ichbiah can already no longer be with us?

    The thought was so disquieting that it took me immediately back to the last time I wrote about Ichbiah, and indeed about Ada Lovelace for whom his language was named. It was in the context of my quest a couple of years ago to identify the Top Twenty Software People in the World.

    It began as an innocent enough exercise, inadvertently kick-started by Tim Bray writing in his popular "Ongoing" blog about how he rated Google's Adam Bosworth as "probably one of the top 20 software people in the world." Already famous for Quattro Pro, Microsoft Access, and Internet Explorer 4 even before he joined BEA as VP of engineering in 2001, when BEA bought Crossgain, the company he'd by then cofounded after leaving Microsoft, Bosworth went on to become BEA's chief architect before leaving to join Google. Definitely a shoo-in for the Top Twenty then. But the question naturally arose - or at least it did in my mind - who are the other 19?

    I knew that it would not be easy to answer, and not because there are too few candidates but because there are too many. The names of today's leading i-technologists - whose collective smarts Internet technologies rely on for their unceasing innovation and ingenuity - trip off most people's tongues in a heartbeat: just think of Sergey Brin, Bill Joy, Linus Torvalds, Tim Berners-Lee, James Gosling, Anders Hejlsberg, Don Box, Nathan Myhrvold, W. Daniel Hillis, Mitch Kapor... all clear members of the "technorati" or "digerati" - call them what you will - the undisputed aristocrats of the online world.

    But what about those who came before, the precursors of the current crop of talent? I wrote at the time:

    "Can a list of the Top 20 i-Technologists possibly be compiled that doesn't cause the online equivalent of fistfights when published? Obviously not. But that shouldn't deter us from trying."

    My inbox soon began to throb with the deluge of nominations, and within days I was able to list forty mind-bogglingly gifted candidates, as follows (click on the name for a brief description of the individual concerned):

    * Tim Berners-Lee: "Father of the World Wide Web" and expectant father of the Semantic Web
    * Joshua Bloch: Formerly at Sun, where he helped architect Java's core platform; now at Google
    * Grady Booch: One of the original developers of the Unified Modeling Language
    * Adam Bosworth: Famous for Quattro Pro, Microsoft Access, and IE4; then BEA, now Google
    * Don Box: Coauthor of SOAP
    * Stewart Brand: Cofounder in 1984 of the WELL bulletin board
    * Tim Bray: One of the prime movers of XML, now with Sun
    * Dan Bricklin: Co-creator (with Bob Frankston) of VisiCalc, the first PC spreadsheet
    * Larry Brilliant: Cofounder in 1984 of the WELL bulletin board

    1. Re:Article text by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      today Gay still guides Adobe's Flash's development

      No he doesn't. He hasn't been at Adobe for a long while now, and in fact, he and Robert Tatsumi have formed a new startup with other notable ex-Flash engineers.

    2. Re:Article text by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Is there any way we could gather up all these ex-Flash engineers and do something terrible to them, like make them browse the web for four years without any Flash extensions? Or, maybe, force them to release the source for Flash rendering and submit the Flash formats to an open standards body?

      Until then, they really shouldn't even be mentioned in an article about 'Tech Heroes.'

    3. Re:Article text by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      Sigh... If only there was a "Mod: -1, Dumbass"...

      Look, tell you what: as soon as you conceive of and write a bit of code that is installed on a few hundred million machines around the world, and ends up producing a multibillion dollar corporate merger, let us know, OK?

      You may find Flash's success to be annoying to your ideology, but the monstrous technical success it's had, and failure of competing technologies, leaves no room for argument here.

    4. Re:Article text by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      We could substitute in 'ActiveX' or any number of other registered trademarks for 'Flash' and have a wholehearted discussion here, I guarantee.

      For gods sake, you make 'ideology' out to be a nasty word.

  19. Heroes by alexj33 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With the patenting of other people's ideas, Microsoft could be the "Sylar" of Tech Heroes.

    1. Re:Heroes by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Linux: OH NO! I'M THE BOMB!

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  20. Ada and Ruby by krischik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ada, the most overhyped language until Ruby. Ada was not overhyped - Ada delivered everything it promised. Ada was rather underestimaded by those who never learned Ada.

    Of course that was the problem: When Ada came out only very powerfull system where able to run an Ada compiler so not many programmers could actualy try the language.

    But that's not a problem any more, grap yourself an open source Ada compiler [1] and see for yourself.

    As for Ruby: That seems a nice enough language as well. Never given me any problems. So where actually is your problem?

    Martin

    [1] http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Ada_Programming/Insta lling
    1. Re:Ada and Ruby by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Of course that was the problem: When Ada came out only very powerfull system where able to run an Ada compiler so not many programmers could actualy try the language.

      Actually, the problem as I understood it was that Ada compilers were required to undergo a strict certification process, managed in part by the U.S. government. This process was very expensive for compiler vendors, therefore the compilers were themselves very expensive. Getting your hands on an Ada compiler cost several thousand dollars, compared to a $150 copy of Turbo Pascal.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:Ada and Ruby by Archtech · · Score: 1

      The cost of Ada compilers should not have been a problem, but a valuable feature. Ada was not meant to be used for writing games, trivial utilities, or ephemeral database apps a la VB. Instead, it was designed for making software as reliable and error-free as possible, so that it could be used in support of business, or in other important/critical applications. When you fly the Atlantic, do you try to do so using a paper aeroplane you whipped up yourself with parts from a DIY store, or do you pay for a flight on a proper airline? It's reasonable to assume that, where reliable software is needed, having a validated compiler is probably more important than having to pay a few thousand dollars for a compiler (and, let's not forget, a complete configuration management and build system, which comes with every valid Ada compiler).

      Only a real PHB would quibble at that kind of cost.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    3. Re:Ada and Ruby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very apt analogy, since the flight control software of most modern airliners is written in Ada. See this page by the GNAT people for a partial list.

  21. Please tell me that was not an ordered list by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    For crying out loud I hope that list was not supposed to be in order of importance.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  22. Vannevar Bush by Aphrika · · Score: 3, Informative

    He's an absolutely huge omission from the list.

    If you're unaware, he wrote a memo in 1945 titled 'As we may think' which laid down a lot of seminal ideas about information, computing devices (the Memex) and the way in which we interact with it - specifically the concept of hypertext.

    If you haven't already read his memo, give it a shot. Along with Alvin Toffler's book 'Future Shock', this changed the way I view technology for ever... oh, stick Alvin Toffler on the list too, Bill Gates for 'commoditising' the PC, Gordon Moore, pretty much anyone who ever worked at Xerox PARC and the guy who invented the MP3 codec. They're all important to why we're sat here today.

    1. Re:Vannevar Bush by pjones · · Score: 1

      Bush's memo/article (published originally in The Atlantic Monthy) did have an effect in America. But the ideas in it as regards hypertext are far from original.

      From 1937, HG Wells' essay/lecture "The World Brain: The Idea of a Permanent World Encyclopedia" reflects a more accurate version of what we now call the World Wide Web. Bush's hypertext was mostly personal and barely social. http://sherlock.berkeley.edu/wells/world_brain.htm l

      And even more important was Emanuel Goldberg, who actually had the machine that Bush describes working and patented pre-WWII. Unfortunately, for Goldberg, who had been head of Zeiss Optical, the Nazis tried to surpress all of his work. He eventually ended up in Palestine (later Israel of course) where his further work was kept secret. See Michael Buckland's great biography for this story in creativity, leadership, technology, politics and history. http://www.amazon.com/Emanuel-Goldberg-His-Knowled ge-Machine/dp/0313313326/

      --
      Certified Black Helicopter Pilot *** Unwitting Dupe of One World Gov'ment
  23. Americans with Disabilities Act... by krischik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    American Dental Association...
    Americans for Democratic Action...
    Assistant District Attorney...
    American Diabetes Association...

    which of them [1] are you sick off?

    I personaly am sick of people who don't know that a "A female given name."[2] is not spelled all upper case.

    Martin

    [1] http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ADA
    [2] http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Ada

  24. Bill Gates .. by rs232 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Bill Gates for single handedly creating the Desktop computer, the GUI, the Web and the Internet .. :)

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
    1. Re:Bill Gates .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you're cool.

    2. Re:Bill Gates .. by sgt_doom · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I'll bet you happened to view the same WTO in Seattle documentary I did, where a typical idiot and WTO delegate (from America, 'natch) is arguing with a protester, and proclaiming that Bill Gates "invented the Internet to feed the poor."

      SHEEEESH!!!!

      Seriously though, that list MUST include The Woz (Steve Wozniak - or Steve #1). And, of course, the inclusion of Doug Englebart should be a no-brainer. And anyone who lists Ann Winblad on any list should be seriously discounted......

  25. Please check sites before linking them by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    This is by far the worst one.

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  26. Dubious paternity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    "In 1924 and 28, Nyquist and Hartley published the limits to communication over a noisy channel. In 1949, Shannon and Weaver published a book on the same subject. Shannon got the credit for Nyquists' and Hartley's work. He also claimed the 34 year old sampling theorem as his own work.
    H. Nyquist, "Certain Factors Affecting Telegraph Speed," Bell Systems Tech. Jour., vol. 3, April 1924, p. 324
    H. Nyquist, "Certain Topics in Telegraph Transmission Theory," A.I.E.E. Trans., vol. 47, April 1828, p. 617
    R. V. L. Hartley, "The Transmission of Information"Bell Systems Tech. Jour., vol. 7, July 1928, pp. 535-564"

    http://www.analog-rf.com/mixer.shtml

    I'd say Shannon is a candidate for someone who got credit that belonged to someone else.

    1. Re:Dubious paternity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Are you sure about that, or are you just believing that source that you've seen? I ask, because there doesn't seem to be much else out there implying that Shannon dubiously appropriated the work of Nyquist and Hartley and passed it off as his own original work. It would be scandalous if that were the case.

      As I recall from reading Shannon's paper years ago, Shannon does reference (rather than appropriating the work of) Nyquist in his 1949 paper, and what is generally regarded as his original contribution, the noisy-channel coding theorem was not published previously by Nyquist.

      Are you referring to what is known as the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem (Nyquist first, Shannon second)? This was known already, and Shannon in fact references Nyquist in this regard.

      I don't know about Hartley, but are you actually suggesting that there was nothing new at all in what is generally regarded as one of the greatest scientific papers published? If so, I'd like to see many, many more reputable sites than the shady-looking page written by one person, who for all we know might have an axe to grind.

  27. Proof that global warming is getting serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    By the time I logged in to read a Slashdot article about the creators of the Internet, not a single Al Gore joke had been posted.

    1. Re:Proof that global warming is getting serious by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      I think more and more people are finally seeing his movie and getting the crap scared out of them.
      After I saw it I was eager for anything to cheer me up.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  28. Clean link by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    YARGH! Mine eyes and ears are bleeding! This one even stumped adblock with filterset G. Here's the print version: http://web2journal.com/read/331813_p.htm

    We need a tag for "loaded up with ads to the point where you can't even RTFA if you wanted to", but I can't think of anything pithy. "adsoup"?

    --
    I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
  29. Some don't make sense by MECC · · Score: 1

    Some people are on his list just because they hold ranking positions on big companies, not for what they did.

    How the hell did Bill Gate get on a list with Vince Cerf, John Postel, Robert Metcalfe, and Nicklaus Wirth? All he did was singlehandly pollute the Internet with spam, and lower IT standards to the point of making IT the laughing stock of the technology sector. Truly an intellectual midget among giants.

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
    1. Re:Some don't make sense by kfg · · Score: 1

      Jano, Columbo and Lampredi were the engineering geniuses and Chinetti the marketing genius; but Ferrari is the one that had his name on the cars and the bulk of the subsequent biographies.

      Such is the way of the brand driven world.

      KFG

    2. Re:Some don't make sense by westlake · · Score: 1
      How the hell did Bill Gates get on a list with Vince Cerf.. All he did was singlehandly pollute the Internet with spam, and lower IT standards to the point of making IT the laughing stock of the technology sector

      Bill Gates is a "laughing stock" only to the proto-Geek who laughed at the Model T Ford, so much less elegant a solution than the Stanley Steamer. But you could "afford a Ford" and so the Ford became ubiquitous.

      The PC is everywhere for the same reason that paved roads are everywhere. The market became big enough and strong enough to bear the cost. That is Gate's achievement.

    3. Re:Some don't make sense by chromatic · · Score: 2

      The PC is everywhere for the same reason that paved roads are everywhere. The market became big enough and strong enough to bear the cost. That is Gate's achievement.

      Bill Gates worked at IBM, on the PC? That was his idea?

    4. Re:Some don't make sense by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      IBM's idea certainly wasn't a machine everyone could afford.

      If anyone is to get the credit for that (on the x86 side of things), then it's probably Compaq.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    5. Re:Some don't make sense by MECC · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates is a "laughing stock" only to the proto-Geek who laughed at the Model T Ford

      There are so many of them still around. Actually, its not BG whose the laughing stock - its the "IT" sector that's a laughing stock to every other engineering and technical discipline. Almost entirely because of the phrase "microsoft standard".

      --
      "We are all geniuses when we dream"
      - E.M. Cioran
  30. Fire of My Loins! by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    Nabokov called _Lolita_ the story of his love affair with the English language.

    (I vote we talk about anything and everything *except TFA.)

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    1. Re:Fire of My Loins! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Can I talk about the TV show "Heroes"? They're just asking me to do so with that title.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  31. i-Technology? by Xenographic · · Score: 1

    There's a list about "i-Technology" and neither Jonathan Ive, nor even Steve Jobs is anywhere to be found!?

  32. The Lamarr Patent by westlake · · Score: 3, Informative
    When the group got back to the US, they applied for a patent and possibly as a joke put only Hedy's name on it.

    Lamarr was in Hollywood in 1937.

    U.S. Patent Number 2,292,387, August 11th, 1942, [was awarded to Hedy Lamarr] under the name 'Hedy Keisler Markey' (her married name) and George Antheil, for a 'Secret Communications System.' Nomination for the EFF Pioneer award

    Lamarr's first husband was an independent munitions maker interested in control systems whose European properties were confiscated by the Reich in 1938. George Antheil, an avant-garde composer interested in the related problem of synchronizing non-traditional "instruments" in concert performance. Advanced Weaponry of the Stars

    Hitler wanted to win by bluff and before the war started, invited public figures from England and the US to see how invincible his military was.

    Hitler was always alert to the propaganda value of massive displays of troops and guns and planes.

    But he was not such a fool as to prematurely expose the secret technologies of jet propulsion, radar, guided missiles, the Enigma, etc., that, in the end, might prove decisive.

    1. Re:The Lamarr Patent by kfg · · Score: 1

      U.S. Patent Number 2,292,387, August 11th, 1942, [was awarded to Hedy Lamarr] under the name 'Hedy Keisler Markey' (her married name) and George Antheil. . .

      I knew how much to trust the guy the second he said this:

      ". . .as a joke put only Hedy's name on it."

      KFG

  33. Douglas Engelbart by MrOion · · Score: 1

    I wonder why people seem to forget the inventions done by Douglas Engelbart. "What did he do?", you might ask. Or maybe you say something like "oh, the mouse guy, right?". Well, If I was only to point out one thing he did, I would mention what we call "the mother of all demos" which he gave in december 1968. There he demonstrated the use of a mouse, hypertext linking and video conferencing. Again: He demonstrated the use of a mouse and hypertext linking in documents more than 20 years before Tim Berners-Lee "invented" the web.

    Some references for those interested:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Engelbart
    http://sloan.stanford.edu/mousesite/1968Demo.html
    http://www.bootstrap.org/

  34. a few more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Presper Eckert (ENIAC)
    Alex Stepanov (STL)
    J.C.R. Licklider (ARPA)
    Charles Goldfarb et al (SGML)
    Jim Clarke (Silicon Graphics, Netscape)

    Agree this is in part a popularity contest. Some of the ones on the original list were influential tech CEOs or Chief Architects in their time, but does that Hall of Fame material?

    And if you say "Myrhvold", I think you must also say Bruce and ESR....

    1. Re:a few more... by ICantFindADecentNick · · Score: 1

      My tuppence worth. Maurice Wilkes and David Wheeler (look them up). Invented programming as-we-know-it - things like assembly and the sub-routine. I wonder what would have happened if we'd had todays approach to intellectual property back then and those guys had patented something like the sub-routine (OK I know they couldn't have done that in the UK then - but go with me) ? That's a damn site less obvious than some of the stuff they give patents to now.

    2. Re:a few more... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      We would probably all be running machines programmed in Forth. Or something even more 'non conventional' would have popped up.

  35. I'd add Woz and Rotenberg by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd include Steve Wozniak. He was the one who designed the Apple. The Apple II and The Trash-80 were the real home computers available for the masses. The earlier computers where you had to get them from Heathkit or toggle in your boot loader, didn't quite make it in the home and the business.

    Also I would add Jonathan Rotenberg. He founded the Boston computer Society in 1977. The BCS served as a incubator for new products and companies. Many of the large computer companies made presentations and announcements to the BCS. Several companies used groups of people at the BCS as source for focus groups and and source for beta groups (back in the days where they didn't consider customers their alpha testers).

    1. Re:I'd add Woz and Rotenberg by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Woz was a genius of simplicity, but how come nobody ever gives the TRS-80 people credit for their, uh.. brilliant way of criss-crossing the address and data bus almost entirely unbuffered across the keyboard layout?

      Oh, never mind.

      (My personal and somewhat meagre innovation from the same era was using the degrees/radian slide switch on the SR-56 calculator as a hardware interrupt)

  36. I nominate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Al Gore for inventing the internet.
    ... George W. Bush for popularizing "the google".

  37. David J. Bradley by PPH · · Score: 1
    Inventor(?) of the "Ctrl-Alt-Del" key combination.


    I'm afraid the identity of the "Any" key creator (possibly the most useful one in all computing) has been lost to history.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  38. Surely DVD jon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... for reminding the megacorps that "It's about the people stupid!"

  39. What's with that site? by DrRevotron · · Score: 1

    Why are we acknowledging this article? Any site that refers to Web 2.0 as anything other than a stupid marketing buzzword has no clue who the real IT heroes are. How about a hurrah for the poor sap working the graveyard shift in the NOC, or the overworked sysadmin who needs to restore a server or correct daemon errors every time the hyped-up "Web 2.0" services break?

  40. You gotta see this by Shohat · · Score: 1

    If anyone missed it , this is what the article looks like, FF2.0 . The most horrible Adsoup of Web 2.0

  41. the well: marcus watts by Monkius · · Score: 1

    It was nice to see Stewart Brand (and Larry Brilliant) there, the founders of the Well. But, Jeremy didn't mention the _author_ of the Well (PicoSpan), Marcus Watts. (A friend of mine.)

    --
    Matt
  42. It's a philosophical question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shannon%E2%80%93Hartl ey_theorem

    The above linked wiki article is excellent and shows the relation between Nyquist, Hartley and Shannon. AFACT, you could make the argument either way.

    A similar question might be: Who is the father of radio? Marconi? Maxwell?

    Who discovered the electron? ancient Greeks? Stoney? Thompson?

    In attributing credit for something, the guy favors the first one to posit an idea even if the practical implementation came much much later. He points out that the math behind DSP is over a hundred years old. True as far as it goes. Of course, I usually credit Oppenheim. So, the guy may or may not have an axe to grind but at least he seems to be consistent and makes an argument that can be reasonably defended.

  43. My two additions (yes, I know, everybody has some) by merc · · Score: 1
    1. The progenitor of "Internet glue"
    2. Internet, IANA guy
    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
  44. You are easily swayed. by Picass0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't know James Long, Ph.D, but he seems to have an ax to grind. Most people who met Hedy Lamarr would verify she was extremely intelligent. Her husband in the early 30's, Fritz Mandal, was an engineer and producer of aircraft, artilery, and early weapons guidance. It would appear Hedy learned a thing or two during their time together.

    There are many accounts of Lamarr explaining the process by which she and George Antheil invented the concept of frequency hopping. At the outbreak of WWII Hedy had in idea for a torpedo guidance system. Antheil suggested a way to sync the necessary systems together using a roll of punched paper (as in a player piano)

  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. STFU now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have enough to do without attending some sort of award banquet.

  47. strict certification process has it's merrits by krischik · · Score: 1

    Indeed they had - but that too has been abolished. Getting an Ada compiler today cost you $0,-- these days (thanks to the US-Navy sponsoring one). And it is not a crippled compiler like the Delphi for home users. It's fully functional, with IDE (also fully functional) and even an CORBA ORB. Ada has learned from it's mistakes.

    However: There is an advantage here as well: All compiler ventdors - even today - comply with the standart. There is an ISO standart describing the official test harnish.

    All unlike C/C++ where only one minor player has a fully compliant compiler. So he says: There is no official test harnish to find out.

    Martin

  48. Have to give trash-80 credit by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    In the early Model 3s, it had a special security feature. If you turned the power off with the diskette in the drive, it would wipe the diskette. It sold very well to bookies, loan-sharks, mafioso.