Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Movie Piracy Claims Mostly Fiction?

Justin Primus writes "Michael Geist's weekly column dismantles recent claims that Canada is the world's leading movie piracy haven. The article uses the industry's own data to demonstrate that the assertions about movie bootlegging and its economic impact are greatly exaggerated and that the MPAA's arguments about Canadian copyright law are misleading. I particularly liked how Geist dug up the fact that the MPAA itself says that there have only been 179 movies recorded with a camcorder over the past three years out of the 1,400 that the Hollywood studios released."

36 of 151 comments (clear)

  1. Mostly? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

    The true part: "There is a nation, it is called Canada."

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Mostly? by Lev13than · · Score: 5, Funny

      The true part: "There is a nation, it is called Canada."

      Not so fast - them's fighting words... You need to know that within the Nation of Canada there's also the Nation of Quebec and the hundred or so First Nations. Then there's the Nunavut Territory, which is actually the Innu Nation. And don't forget the province of Newfoundland and Labrador, which was a Sovereign Nation until it grudgingly allowed the rest of Canada to join them in 1949 (and is still embroiled in a territorial dispute with the Nation of Quebec). Of course, now that we're down this path we're going to have to deal with the Metis Nation, the Acadian Nation and who knows what else. Eventually we'll reach the point where we have to recognize the Nation of the Borough of East York.

      In short, the whole "Nation" thing is a bit messy up here, so it's really better for everyone if you just don't bring it up. To avoid similar confusion in the future, I suggest you go with the universally accepted moniker of "The 51st State".

      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    2. Re:Mostly? by twig_nl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then there's the Nunavut Territory, which is actually the Innu Nation.

      Actually, that would be the Inuit. The Innu nation is in Labrador (where the Inuit live too, but farther north and on the coast).

    3. Re:Mostly? by S.O.B. · · Score: 2, Informative

      To bring it back into focus.

      Our country's full name is Canada not the Dominion of Canada. The British North America Act (1867) declares "the Provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick shall form and be One Dominion under the Name of Canada; and on and after that Day those Three Provinces shall form and be One Dominion under that Name accordingly." (emphasis added)

      In this context the word "dominion" means "nation".

      The term "Dominion of Canada" was never officially recognized and has not been in regular use in government documents since the 50's or 60's so as not to intimidate our neighbour to the south.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
  2. Broken Record by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does anyone believe these unaccountable, selfserving "stats" released by the notoriously lying, litigious, abusive RIAA? We don't make gas mileage requirements taking oil companies' reports as gospel, except when "we" are really screwing "ourselves".

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Broken Record by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Funny

      And why anyone would want a movie that was taped in a theater on a camcorder is beyond me. That sound wasn't the orcs coming from deep within the mountain, it was your feet sticking to the floor..

    2. Re:Broken Record by AJWM · · Score: 2, Informative

      If books were still popular, I might have mistakenly typed the BPAA (imaginary Book Publishers Association of America).

      That would probably be the ABA, the American Booksellers Association. They intimidate even the publishers. (In how many other industries can the retailer get a refund on units ordered just by ripping off the cover (boxtop, whatever) and sending that back?) Not that all publishers are saints (some are, but the bigger houses tend to be like corporations everywhere).

      And books are still popular. Readership statistics really haven't changed much in the last hundred or so years. Distribution models -- as with other industries -- are a mess, though.

      --
      -- Alastair
  3. eh? by TinBromide · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So the piracy claims about canada are mostly fiction, how is this different than the opinion* most piracy claims made in north america?

    *I say opinion because there are no facts about piracy beyond the fact that it does happen, and it may or may not be good for the industry depending on who you ask.

    --
    Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
  4. proof! by geedra · · Score: 5, Funny

    there have only been 179 movies recorded with a camcorder over the past three years out of the 1,400 that the Hollywood studios released
    ..confirming that less than 13% of their crap is worth watching.

    1. Re:proof! by thebigbluecheez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, that and the fact that you have to pay to camcorder the movie. Isn't that kind of against the whole idea of pirating?

      --
      I like your Macs, but I don't like your Mac users. (with apologies to Gandhi)
    2. Re:proof! by davecb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When camcorders first came out, a school friend's father set up a tripod in the projection room and taped a lovely copy of a then-popular movie. You could barely hear a low whir in the background from the projector...

      Can't get more "inside" than that.

      --dave

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
  5. Flawed Stats by bendodge · · Score: 3, Informative

    Take any statistics an entity comes up with to help itself with a grain of salt, and then ask for the raw data and methods, so that you can reproduce the results. If they can't give you the data for privacy reasons, at least look at the samples and methods.

    Basically, don't trust in-house statistics, unless you can reproduce the results yourself.

    --
    The government can't save you.
    1. Re:Flawed Stats by Jesus_666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You: Can I have your raw data and methods please?
      MPAA: No, because of privacy concerns.
      You: Ah, well, then you can surely give me the samples you worked with?
      MPAA: No, those are private as well. As are our methods.
      You: Can I at least see the results?
      MPAA: No, those are especially private.
      You: Well, what can you give me?
      MPAA: Nothing. There never was a statistic. These are not the droids you are looking for. We're not here. *hides behind a tree*

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  6. Shrink rate by Skadet · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'll probably get modded down for this, but. . . .

    I particularly liked how Geist dug up the fact that the MPAA itself says that there have only been 179 movies recorded with a camcorder over the past three years out of the 1,400 that the Hollywood studios released."
    You can't be serious. That's 11% of theatrical releases! Could you imagine if a retail store had an 11% shrink rate? (Hint for those unfamiliar with retail: 11% is head-rolling territory).

    Look, I disagree with the RIAA as much as the next /.'er. But this statistic simply doesn't prove what the author was hoping to prove.
    1. Re:Shrink rate by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And those are the least downloaded I'm sure. I, for one, completely ignore CAM versions and either wait for DVD or the "better" release that's ripped from some other source (usually DVD).

      I don't bother to pirate much anymore because their DVD release schedules are so fast -- but if someone does need to be seen I certainly wouldn't bother with a 700MB CAM.

    2. Re:Shrink rate by digidave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's not necessarily 11%.

      Where does the number 179 come from? Is that the number of arrests made? If so, then that's 179 out of however many million Canadians went to see those 1400 movies. Or maybe that's 179 releases made from camcorders in Canadian theatres, in which case all 179 might have come from one person or a small group of people. Maybe 179 incidents only accounts for ten movies with multiple recording attemps done for those movies.

      It's like if you analyzed a large chain store and found that 11% of all the individual items they sold were stolen somewhere within the chain. Maybe only one of each item was stolen, meaning on average less than one per store, but somehow you end up with a bogus 11% shrink rate because you don't know how to work the numbers properly (or because you do and you are dishonest).

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    3. Re:Shrink rate by tinkerghost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're using the wrong ratio. 11% shrink isn't what they are talking about. They are talking about only 11% of the products on the shelves - in all of the stores - was stolen by camming.
      In retail you're talking more along the lines of saying - "OK this year we've had 3% shrinkage, of that 80% was by shoplifting and 20% was credit/check fraud. Looking into the fraud, we can see that only 11% of the products we stock are ever stolen by fraud." This should be followed by the question "WTF is wrong with the rest of our crap that it's not even worth stealing"

    4. Re:Shrink rate by bcattwoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not necessarily 11%.

      Where does the number 179 come from? Is that the number of arrests made? If so, then that's 179 out of however many million Canadians went to see those 1400 movies. Or maybe that's 179 releases made from camcorders in Canadian theatres, in which case all 179 might have come from one person or a small group of people. Maybe 179 incidents only accounts for ten movies with multiple recording attemps done for those movies.
      Rather than speculating, you can just read the cited document(I know wild speculation is more fun):

      "MPAA analysis of counterfeit copies of recently released movies on DVD seized throughout the world reveals that more than 90 percent can be sourced back to theatrical camcording. As of August 2006, MPAA had documented 179 member company titles that had been stolen in this manner since 2004, providing the source copies for pirate DVDs discovered in the markets of 46 other countries on every inhabited continent."
    5. Re:Shrink rate by Frenchy_2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The author makes his point perfectly, although the summary does not make it quite clear.
      99% of the movies that are released get pirated. Out of all those pirated movies, only 11% are from bad cam recording. The rest are mostly DVD rips a bit later, DVD rips of advance projection or review copies or again for oscar nominations.

      The author point is not that few movies are pirated (as stated, most movies are already available in pirated form), but that the camcording in the movie theater is a marginal form (mostly because of the dreadful results it gives). Most pirated movies are internal leaks.

    6. Re:Shrink rate by AJWM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's 11% of theatrical releases! Could you imagine if a retail store had an 11% shrink rate?

      Faulty comparison. For that to be valid, then after somebody camcords a movie, nobody pays ticket price any more. Taking something off a retail store shelf makes that particular item unavailable for anyone else to buy, so it is a real loss. A cam copy may cut in to movie ticket sales slightly, but it doesn't make the movie no longer available in the theatre.

      You'd have a somewhat better comparison (although still flawed) if pirates were holding up the theatres and stealing the reels of film.

      --
      -- Alastair
  7. The reality is... by Bullfish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The MPAA knows the claim is bogus... like the RIAA lobbying to try to alter Canada's copyright provisions to suit them, this is just trying to sow seeds to try to get the copyright laws changed to suit the MPAA. Seriously, anyone who does download movies knows the camcorder rips are the worst of the lot... it's the studio prints that are desireable... and where do those come from?... It's all just PR (or propaganda if you will) designed to try to further their aims... and to borrow a line from another topic... this ploy is not intelligently designed...

    You want to know why ticket sales are down... Ask yourself this...What is the last movies that you just had to see?

    1. Re:The reality is... by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "What is the last movies that you just had to see?"

      Unfortunately, there HAVE been a few movies in the past few years that I just -had- to see. As many as when I was a kid, and I -know- I was less picky when I was a kid. A few that I remember off the top of my head:

      Star Wars Ep 1 (2 was a must-see, but disappointed.)
      Epic Movie (Yeah, that was just last week)
      Aeon Flux
      War of the Worlds
      Signs
      Lady in the Water

      And I'm sure there were quite a few others, as I avidly looked forward to going to the movie theatre about every 3rd or 4th week. (The other weeks, we went anyhow but not because we -had- to see that particular movie.)

      So actually, there's been plenty worth watching to at least some of us. If you found nothing good, perhaps you should find another source of entertainment, instead. Don't use it as an excuse to download movies without paying for them. (Not accusing you, I mean that in general.)

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:The reality is... by Knara · · Score: 3, Funny

      So what I'm getting here is that you frequently need to see shitty movies?

  8. And how many in Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They asserted 50% movie piracy by camcorders in Canada.

    The total FOR THE WORLD piracy rate is 11% OF THEATRICAL RELEASES according to the MPAAs own numbers.

    Also just because 11% of the worldwide movies are camcordered doesn't mean they lost 11% of their movie revenues. So it's not even wastage. How did Star War do? It was heavily camcordered in the 1980's.

  9. MPAA's most successful tactic... by HaeMaker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Make movies so horrible no one would bother recording it.

  10. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  11. FYI clarrification by edwardpickman · · Score: 3, Insightful
    there have only been 179 movies recorded with a camcorder over the past three years out of the 1,400 that the Hollywood studios released.

    That technique is just one of the methods and is arguably the worst way to pirate. A lot of films get bootlegged during post production and often show up before the film is released in theaters. Waterworld showed up in Russia as this chaotic mix of dailies and some cut scenes, not that the final release was much better. The most popular way to pirate has to be ripped DVDs. My friends in distribution call them $20 masters. You buy one copy and use it as a master recording. I shot a couple of low budget films and my distributor told me he saw bootlegs selling for a $1 in Malaysia right next to 100 mill Hollywood films also selling for $1. There is no market in South East Asia for domestic films, they're all pirated and sold openly. I think you'll find there are pirates of every film made. Pirating is largely free and if they are reselling the pirates DVDs are cheap to burn.

    1. Re:FYI clarrification by punkr0x · · Score: 2, Informative
      Which is exactly what the feature article says:

      the window of availability of the camcorded versions is very short. Counterfeiters invariably seek to improve the quality of their DVDs by dropping the camcorder versions as soon as the studios begin production of authentic DVDs (which provide the source for perfect copies).
  12. To paraphrase Mark Twain... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are lies, damn lies, and MP/RIAA statistics.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  13. Served its purpose... by debest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The movie industry made a big deal out of this simply to get some good headlines. Geist's expected hatchet job on its "facts" are beside the point. Virtually no one will hear it: only those already tuned in to the lies are reading Geist's columns.

    The purpose of the hype was to provide "justification" for Bev Oda to push for the reforms that she and the content industry have been working on. If this goes as I expect, watch for some more sabre-rattling headlines to come, followed quickly by a copyright reform bill that will address the content industry's wish list.

    As much as I don't want another election, I hope the Conservatives' upcoming budget is defeated, so that any of Oda's bills will die on the table when the government falls.

    --
    Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    1. Re:Served its purpose... by canfirman · · Score: 3, Insightful
      As much as I don't want another election, I hope the Conservatives' upcoming budget is defeated, so that any of Oda's bills will die on the table when the government falls.

      The problem is that if it isn't Oda, it'll be somebody else. The movie and music industries will just turn their attention to the next Heritage Minister. No matter what political party is in power, the movie and music industry will always shmooze with the government to get their way.

      --
      It is not our abilities that show what we truly are... it is our choices.
  14. "Stealing" by Mariner28 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have a hard time with the MPAA's and the RIAA's use of the term stealing. If I steal something from you, I deprive you of its use. When someone "pirates" something of yours, they deprive you of some potential revenue - quite a different scenario than "stealing".

    And when someone tries to equate 11% of 1400 theater releases being filmed by camcorder-wielding pirates to an 11% shrink rate, well that's called FUD . Now, if the box-office receipts of 179 theaters were stolen by thieves - that I'd call an 11% shrink rate!!!

    --
    "A little misunderstanding? Galileo and the Pope had a little misunderstanding."
  15. Incentive to watch a movie at the movie theatres? by arock99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Their lost revenue isnt some cheap cammed version of a movie here...it's because more people than ever before have big screen televions at home. DVD is also to blame...the quality is just better than ever before at home and people have more reason to either rent or buy a movie. The novelty of watching it on a big screen has worn off to some point. What they need to do is give people more incentive to go see it while it is still at the movie theatre. Perhaps a voucher where you get a discount if you buy the movie on DVD later...or perhaps try and make more movies people want to watch. There is a reason why there is a lot more direct to DVD movies than ever before. Movie theatres are going to become a novelty someday and will simply complement simultaneous release on DVD of movies. It's up to the industry to wake up and learn this sooner rather than later. Look at the music industry...they lost more revenues than they could have by trying to fight digital music downloads rather than embrace it. It is nice to see that the video game industry seems to have learned from all of this by letting people download video games on their consoles and letting amateur gave developer in on the revenue pie (360, PS3, and wii all allow you to download games). One thing's for sure though let's hope they never go entirely digital...it is nice to own a movie you can see on your shelf...the same applies to video games

  16. Real Piracy by HeyBob! · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I got this from a friend in the biz:
    Location: somewhere in the former Eastern Bloc (I can't remember the actual city)
    Film lands at airport and is sent out to a series of theaters via courier. Except that the courier van is actual a portable dubbing studio on wheels (worth 100's of k's). The pirates took a couple of hours to do all the deliveries and by that time had a pristine digital copy of the movie.

    The way they were caught was the studio inserted unique frames in to every copy of the print made (1000's of prints around the world). They were able to nail it down to an area and then sent investigators to watch for the projectionist to make the copies. When that panned out, they finally figured out that it was being done by the courier company.

  17. Probably the most successful 13% by Geof · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The movie industry, like the music industry, releases a large number of movies, but makes most of the money from a small number of hits. Since pirates will tend to target the most popular films, that 13% of films probably represents the majority of revenues and profits.

    Of course, it's very difficult to determine just how much loss the existence of pirate versions of those films represents to the industry. It might be significant; it might be quite small. The MPAA hardly has a record of being honest in its assessments. How many in-theater pirated DVDs of Hollywood films do Slashdotters have? Are you folks aware of many other people with pirated DVDs? I bet it's not many, though I also suspect Slashdot's (often young, male, with disposable income, tech and pop culture savy) population is a prime target for both Hollywood and pirates. How many Thais (say) would have bought the $20 DVD if there were no pirated version? I bet that's not so many either.

  18. the notion of a nation by Howserx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The notion of a nation motion is not to make a nation legislation, and while emotions about the motion are running high what people need to know is according to all the promotion, the motion states that all these nations can only be nations within a united nation... of Canada http://www.cbc.ca/22minutes/video.html December 5th: Nation Explaination

    --
    I support the troops. I pay f'ing taxes.