Slashdot Mirror


Breakdown Forces New Look At Mars Mission Sexuality

FloatsomNJetsom writes "Popular Mechanics has up an interesting story, discussing what the long-term implications of the Lisa Nowak incident could mean for Mars Mission crew decisions: With a 30-month roundtrip, that isn't the sort of thing you'd want to happen in space. Scientists have been warning about the problems of sex on long-term spaceflight, and experts are divided as to whether you want a crew of older married couples, or asexual unitard-wearing eunuchs. The point the article makes specifically is that NASA's current archetype of highly-driven, task-oriented people might be precisely the wrong type for a Mars expedition. In addition scientists may use genomics or even functional MRI in screening astronauts, in addition to facial-recognition computers to monitor mental health during the mission." Maybe observers could just deploy the brain scanner to keep track of them?

11 of 528 comments (clear)

  1. Submariners by Zebadias · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They only need to look as far as the crew on a submarine to see what makeup can last a year. AFIK they are all male crew.

  2. Spaceballs by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, what we want is pansexual swingers in a nonstop orgy . People who will have sex without conflating it with love, possession, jealousy, status or other issues. To prevent inferiority conflicts with mission rank, sexual performance should be evaluated along with other mission skills.

    All of it on camera, especially the long seasons spent in zero-g. The syndication rights could fund the entire mission, and the subsequent colonization.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  3. Simple by markov_chain · · Score: 5, Funny

    Recruit the astronauts from among the slashdot readers. They won't have a problem going a couple of years without sex. You can't miss what you don't know!

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  4. There are sexy missionaries on Mars? by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why was I not informed of this earlier? Suddenly I feel the need to go and preach to the heathen martians.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  5. Re:Movie deal by thisIsNotMyName · · Score: 5, Funny

    I suggest this story be tagged with as 'spaceballs'.

  6. Ensuring 30 months with no sex? by blankoboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just pile some PC's onboard preloaded with WOW. This will 100% ensure that no sex will take place. Other side effects include 0 mission objectives accomplished though. They would land at their destination and never get out of the ship. =)

  7. Help, not screen by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Insightful

    NASA's problem is that they're stuck in the old model of "we want to find the VERY BEST candidate" and a "process of elimination." Many corporations long ago realized that you look for good people you can refine to be the best and you keep them. NASA's like an employer that shows a brilliant stock trader the door after an interview because he's a horrendous dresser, instead of hiring him and his supervisor taking him to a tailor some evening.

    Guess what? We're all full of faults, and even after decades of refining their screening technique, they didn't detect that this woman could have serious mental issues.

    Would You Seek Help If It Meant You'd Never Fly On the Shuttle covers the matter better than I could, but basically: NASA's reaction to this is more intense screening, when it should be to recognize the commitment made on both sides and help them resolve their personal problems.

    My employer has an entire department dedicated to helping employees with "life" problems. It's anonymous; your supervisor or coworkers never find out you even talked to them. Why? Because it's better to have someone for you to talk to and try and help you with little problems, before they become problems that interfere with your work. Had NASA had a similar program, chances are the astronaut in question would have received the mental help/counselling she needed.

    Instead, NASA lost a great astronaut and her life has been destroyed.

  8. Monitoring them will not work by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This has all of the makings of several classic sci-fi movies

    Just because you monitor them does not give you the capability to fix things if things go bad on Mars.

    Of course, you can send groups of people on long journeys. Just take a look at the classic journeys of exploration, where people were at sea, out of site of land, often for many months at a time.

    But they had a solution to certain problems that you can't have in a space ship. You can't put discontents on an island in the fashion of Robinson Cruscoe, or set them adrift in a boat like Captain Bligh was.

    You need to have a practical body of techniques as a solution to resolving human issues that does not require much in terms of medications. You can run out of medications. You need to be able to debug the mind.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  9. Robert Heinlein? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "With a 30-month roundtrip, that isn't the sort of thing you'd want to happen in space."

    Isn't this how "Stranger in a Strange Land" started out? A trip to mars with infidelity and murder?

  10. Re:Maybe... by FireFlie · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or to send only girls..... and a webcam.

  11. Re:*Chuckle* by ozbird · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Asexual 'tards running Unix" - isn't that the Slashdot stereotype? *ducks*