Slashdot Mirror


MIT Scientists Reach Fiber-Optic Breakthrough

kcurtis writes "The AP (via boston.com) has a story about how MIT scientists have detailed a breakthrough in optics that could lead to cheaper, more efficient optical communications. From the story: 'Like polarizing sunglasses that block light waves oriented in different directions, the MIT researchers created a clever device that splits the light beams as they pass through a circuit. The device then rotates one of the polarized beams, before both beams are rejoined on their way out of the circuit, retaining the signals' strength. But it's not just that device that the researchers are touting. They're also trumpeting the innovative method they devised to integrate the optical circuitry with electronic circuitry on the same silicon chip.'"

39 comments

  1. One step at a time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neat. If it also helps us create a death ray then all the better.

    1. Re:One step at a time... by Cycloid+Torus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Death Ray?!? Naw - not important enough.. These MIT guys have figured out how to split, twist and rejoin light - so optical signal loss over distance is nearly eliminated. This means that a light pipe can stretch MUCH farther and provide near light speed transmission of information because the light pipe is directly integrated to the semiconductor switch. When one considers the circuitry in the brain, one can begin to imagine a world mind - all the free computing capacity connected at near light speed in a similar manner - and a Dinkum Thinkum like Mike (Moon is a Harsh Mistress - Heinlein) becomes truly possible - an important time to be "not stupid", yah?!

      --
      Lost in space at an early age. Survived the vacuum. Now rebuilding castle in air.
    2. Re:One step at a time... by overlordmead · · Score: 1

      I always liked mike.

      --
      Think Gnole-ish, not prole-ish
    3. Re:One step at a time... by SanitySolipsism · · Score: 1

      What does it say about our society when websites like YouTube become the biggest reason for this type of development ? [According to TFA]

    4. Re:One step at a time... by Yetihehe · · Score: 3, Funny

      It says we need bigger tubes, not trucks.

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    5. Re:One step at a time... by Cycloid+Torus · · Score: 1
      There will always be YouTubism and such is not a bad thing. What I would rather focus on are the other potentials. A new very fat pipe would seem considerably more useful than what we have today (no, I did not run the math - this is a subjective hunch).

      What might this bring (other than 3D p*rn, immersive MMOs) and what could that mean to your life and mine?!? I have a sense that the scale of this might be significant and worth probing (oh, if I had done that in '71 when I first stumbled onto ARPANET). "Mike" is just one of the possibilities.

      I would like to hear more thoughts about what low lag, low loss connections might yield.

      --
      Lost in space at an early age. Survived the vacuum. Now rebuilding castle in air.
    6. Re:One step at a time... by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      I read "Death Ray" and thought, great, not another format..

    7. Re:One step at a time... by volsung · · Score: 1

      Wide area symmetric multiprocessing. (Too bad WASMP sounds stupid.) The amount of computing power and storage in the world is enormous, but spread out. Anything that can increase throughput and lower latency opens up more options for distributed computing on geographically separated nodes. Not every task needs Infiniband-level of speed and latency. If we can ever get home connections that are reasonably symmetric, there are a lot more options. We might even be able to have something almost like a large, virtual SMP system.

      I'm fascinated by projects like CPUShare, which has a great idea, but seems to be hampered by a need to write your programs in an unusual style to distribute them over all the clients. (And apparently by the Italian government bureaucracy involved in transacting money.) Part of cumbersome nature is just because the project is new, but part is to work around the fact that clients are separated by slow links.

    8. Re:One step at a time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This means that a light pipe can stretch MUCH farther and provide near light speed transmission of information


      Last I checked, light always travels at the speed of light, even if the speed of light is reduced to 38mph.

      Or did you mean the speed of light in a vacuum, or c?

      *picks nit*
    9. Re:One step at a time... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Which prompts a great question: does this make mounting "lasers" on sharks any easier? My boss is demanding fricken sharks with laser beams attached to their heads.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    10. Re:One step at a time... by Cycloid+Torus · · Score: 1
      Light..mm..yah - nit is picked. Was thinking more of all the traffic lights on the current routes and how much finer the ride would be on the expressway - so "closer" to c because of the lack of VALVES in the pipe.

      May the ping be lower.

      --
      Lost in space at an early age. Survived the vacuum. Now rebuilding castle in air.
    11. Re:One step at a time... by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      What might this bring (other than 3D p*rn, immersive MMOs) and what could that mean to your life and mine?!?

      Immersive 3D p*rn MMOs!

    12. Re:One step at a time... by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Symmetric? I doubt it. Sounds more like NUMA.

    13. Re:One step at a time... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I always liked people too. :)

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  2. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This gets me my flying car how??

  3. Balanced optical? by rhowardiv · · Score: 4, Informative

    This sounds a lot like balanced audio connections.

    1. Re:Balanced optical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAICS they are two different things.

    2. Re:Balanced optical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Balanced audio duplicates the signal, inverts the copy, then reverts the copy on the receiving end, so that it a) amplifies the signal (doubling it), and b) cancels out any electromagnetic interference from the cable. Because the original and the copy theoretically suffer from an identical interference noise-print, on reversion the copy's noise-print negates the original signal's.

      The article discribes a process that seems a lot like Balanced Audio, but instead of electromagnetic interference, the light-signal

      become[s] polarized, or randomly oriented horizontally and vertically. As far as I can tell there's not enough information in the article to draw an accurate parallel.
    3. Re:Balanced optical? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      b) cancels out any electromagnetic interference from the cable.

      It doesn't cancel out any electromagnetic interference---just additive interference.

  4. FTL, FTW ! by Hesty+Heffew · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So this will make my Vienna OS crash at the speed of light ?

  5. Is it me or by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    We've had so many breathroughs that we should all have flying cars, be immortal, use sugar cube size supercomputers, and interstellar flight by now??? I Get tired of media hype all of the time!

  6. Integrating photonics and electronics not that new by MetaDFF · · Score: 5, Informative

    It seems what the MIT scientists have created is a purely optical equalizer in a convention CMOS process. This would probably be used at the receiving end of a single mode fiber link. Most of the equalization done today is done electronically using fancy optical receivers (expensive but very robust).

    The article is light on details but the idea of integrating photonics and electronics in a conventional CMOS process isn't a new idea. Maybe the way they did the integration is a breakthrough. A company called Luxtera demonstrated (with products) integrated photonic and electronic transmitters way back in 2005. Their press release from March 2005 http://www.luxtera.com/news_press_2005_0328.htm reveals that they created an optical modulator (a transmitter) in Freescale's CMOS process. The optical modulator they created is also based on the same idea of splitting light and combining it to create on/off pulses at extremely high speeds.

    If you want to read more about their technology and why integrating photonics with electronics is important visit: http://www.luxtera.com/technology_faq.htm

  7. Polarization Mode Dispersion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Something this article didn't even allude to, since the journalist probably had no clue about optics, is that these devices are used for tuneable polarization over long distance spans of fiber. Polarization Mode Dispersion (PMD), where different polarization "angles" travel at slightly different speeds through the fiber, makes it necessary for frequent regeneration devices, PMD correction operations, etc., over hundreds of kilometers, especially with older fiber. New fiber is available with very low PMD characteristics, but a lot of what's deployed 'round the world isn't that type. If you can tune the polarization of the laser feeding the fiber, you can, in effect, pre-compensate for the PMD characteristics of the fiber. I.e., if Polarization Mode A experiences X picoseconds of differential delay relative to a defined norm, this device would induce that same delay in the emitter. In effect, the emitter creates an optical signal with various skewed polarization modes, and the shitty fiber "fixes" it so that the signal received on the other end has minimum PMD characteristics, increasing your optical signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

    Devices like this are going to be the future of long distance backbone networks, where they will enable the operators to remove most of the expensive regenerators, reshapers, and some of the Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifiers (EDFAs). However, MIT is not the first to create these devices; all they have done is develop a new technique for building them on Si, which could reduce their cost and increase their reliability, while decreasing their size. Size is an issue with the current generation of these devices, which are often too large to fit on the smaller modular interface cards on new Internet core routers from Vendor C.

    1. Re:Polarization Mode Dispersion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite true. PMD is not deterministic, it is unstable in time so precompensation for it is not effective. Chromatic dispersion is deterministic and can be compensated for with a smart transmitter, but because PMD varies with time precompensation would only be effective momentarily until the signal reoriented to some new, random polarization.

      (Also, EDFA's don't do much for PMD-induced pulse broadening, the pulses are still just a broad, they're just stronger when the come out, but 2R or 3R regeneration like you mentioned could correct PMD)

    2. Re:Polarization Mode Dispersion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct: non-dynamic precompensation doesn't help PMD. However, when the transceivers on both ends of the link can signal to eachother in real-time the characteristics of the received signal, allowing the other end to re-tune in real-time, you have a closed-loop feedback system. Compare this to wireless channel sounding techniques for selecting output gain, modulation scheme, etc. PMD varies with temperature, torsional and sheer strain on the fiber, etc., and the resulting polarizations are not truly random.

  8. "Technology Writer" clueless as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Light waves gradually weaken over distances as they become polarized, or randomly oriented horizontally and vertically.

    This is depolarization, and has almost nothing to do with fiber attenuation.

    the MIT researchers created a clever device that splits the light beams as they pass through a circuit

    Polarization beam splitters have been known for - what? - 150 years (Brewster) and have been available as fused fiber devices for at least 20. They may have made a significant advance in silica-on-silicon integration technology - it's impossible to tell from the article.

  9. Skynet by garlicbready · · Score: 1

    world mind you say? hmmm interesting
    by the way have you seen sarah connor?

  10. Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Unfortunately, once the Boston Bomb Squad saw the device involved blinking lights, they detonated the prototype after evacuating the MIT subway stop.

    1. Re:Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but this technology will equip the Boston PD with Peril-Sensitive Sunglasses...

  11. Bad Article by Steve525 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The article didn't give a whole lot of detail, and also exaggerated the importance of this work. I'm fairly sure the work being discussed in the article is work being done at MIT on splitting and rotating polorazations in using silicon nitride waveguides. There are a number of research groups (including Luxtera, as someone mentioned) looking at using silicon (and other silicon CMOS materials such as silicon nitride) to make highly integrated optical devices. A lot of progress has been made in the past few years on making modulators, detectors, wavelength splitters, and Raman lasers and amplifiers. One of the problems with these devices is most of them really only work on one polarization. For a telecom system however, you often can't control the incoming polarization. So, this work is a device that splits and rotates the two polarizations so they can be dealt with separately. (And can be integrated on the same chip as the rest of the devices). An important acheivement, but this achievement alone isn't going to make an impact. (It's all the pieces together that might). I've also seen that Luxtera has their own different way of dealing with this.

    The work is also over a year old (unless there's a new development I'm not aware of). I know two of the students who did the work, and they've gotten their PhDs and moved on.

  12. does this mean ... by constantnormal · · Score: 1

    ... that Verizon's FIOS wins and at&t's trailing-edge DSL fades into insignificance?

    Not so long as we lack free markets where Verizon and at&t can compete head-to-head.

    But it would seem that Verizon's customers might reap the benefits of cheap, high-quality fiber transmission, and Verizon will certainly be able to reap higher profits while charging less than the competition (what little competition there is in the USofA telecom markets).

  13. I'm on it... by FernandoBR · · Score: 0, Troll

    if it can speed up my p2p dowloads...

    Sorry my bad English. I'll have him tarred and feathered.

    --
    -x- Sorry my bad English. I'll have him tarred and feathered. -x-
  14. So what .. a "light diode"? (not LED) by donaldGuy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Granted I didn't read TFA (less time than I'd like), but this device basically rectificates (rectifies?) a light wave?

    thats cool. Also, cause I can't stop myself from asking stupid questions.. if diodes can emit light, what can light diodes emit?

  15. Does it mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it mean I'll now have more bandwidth for p0rn?

  16. Silicon Photonics: More info by GanjaManja · · Score: 1

    Here's a cool article from my own university, about the recent breakthrough a professor here had with his Indium-Phosphide bonding to Silicon (which is obviously much cheaper to make electronics on. InP is the material needed to make photonics like lasers etc. at optical communications wavelengths). Maybe this will enlighten a few of you that wanted more detail. http://www.intel.com/research/platform/sp/hybridla ser.htm The technology splitting up the polarizations of a lightwave is probably a regeneration technology, correcting for 'chirp' or 'dispersion' (a pulse broadening out after travelling) but they got it to work on SIlicon. Maybe even using Bower's InP/Si bonding technology. I'll go try to find the original MIT article and see... enjoy!

  17. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 2, Insightful

    MIT Scientists.

    What's with all the "scientist" stories of late. Can't we just say researchers? Which would be more accurate.

  18. WAMPR-S by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

    Wide Area MultiPRocessing-Symmetric - a slight re-arrange for a more palatable acronym. Not too far from womprats, not easily bullseyed due to their ~2-meter length and propensity for hiding in canyons...

    --
    Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
    1. Re:WAMPR-S by Mr_Rose · · Score: 1

      Or you could go for the really obvious one: Symmetric Wide-Area Multi-Processing, or SWAMP. Of course, the inevitable will happen and the SWAMP will at some point become, wait for it, swamped! *crickets*

      --
      There is nothing dirty or unethical about enjoying the sight of a beautiful woman. - Eolake Stobblehouse