Slashdot Mirror


Earth's Constant Hum Explained

MattSparkes writes "It has been known for some time that there is a constant hum that emanates from the Earth, which can be heard near 10 millihertz on a seismometer. The problem was that nobody knew what caused it. It has now been shown that it is caused by waves on the bottom of the sea, and more specifically 'by the combination of two waves of the same frequency travelling in opposite directions.'"

14 of 336 comments (clear)

  1. Hmmmmmmmm by dcw3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok, so the waves are making the sound. Now tell us what causes the waves. I didn't notice a source in TFA.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
    1. Re:Hmmmmmmmm by Dorceon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Considering how litigation-happy that particular church is, you might have considered posting that anonymously.

      --
      What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
  2. Re:Whales by Prune · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This would have been funny, except the ten MILLIhertz frequency (one beat per hundred seconds) is a couple of orders of magnitude lower than what whales can hear.

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    These are seismologists - the same people who try to predict earthquakes. Any noise the earth makes may have something to do with earthquakes and thus is worth study.

  4. Re:Did ancient greeks know about this? by kestasjk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, Pythagoras didn't have a seismometer capable of detecting 10 millihertz..

    --
    // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
  5. Throbbing by andrewuwe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    10 millihertz sounds more like a throb than a hum to me, perhaps even a chug.

  6. Re:hertzs (stacking) by Reverse+Gear · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well many seismometers are constantly on and have very long periods of this noise recorded.
    So with enough stacking you can pretty much detect as low frequencies as you want if only the amplitude is strong enough to be detected by the seismometers, so my guess is that the limiting factor is not the 1 Hz, but lies in how small amplitudes these seismometers detect.

    These suggested waves would hold quite an amount of energy so it does make sense that they are able to detect these to me.

  7. Re:Maybe it's just happy? by LMacG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who said anything about cats?

    --
    Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
  8. Re:Maybe it's just happy? by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Amazingly enough, not all cats are the same. My late tabby only purred when he was happy. Never once did I hear/feel him purr before he received the attention he wanted.

    On the other hand, my current cat is the opposite. Purring seems to have nothing to do with being happy. She will frequently walk up to me and just start purring, and generally stops once I start petting her.

    So it's not really disinformation, it's partial information. Just like yours.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  9. Re:But wait! by rucs_hack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    given the fact that most natural systems exist in some kind of homeostatic relationship with other systems, its likely that the cause is rather complex. I wouldn't have a clue where to start.

    That's what I love about science though, there's yet another thing to explain. I wonder what it will reveal?

  10. Re:Maybe it's just happy? by JargonScott · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ..and lesbian women becoming sexually attracted to nerds...

    Unfortunately they'll be butch instead of lipstick.

    --
    Nuke Gay Whales for Jesus.
  11. Re:But wait! by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1, Insightful

    given the fact that most natural systems exist in some kind of homeostatic relationship with other systems, its likely that the cause is rather complex. I wouldn't have a clue where to start.

    But, you're really quite positive about the whole global warming thing being caused by man, right?

  12. Re:So that's what causes it by bhiestand · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well that begs the question of who is petting it. No, it doesn't.
    --
    SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  13. Re:On mars the atmosphere shakes once every year by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    reference and here and here's a picture of the spare lander that was never launched the boom on it is the meteorology sensor

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.