Slashdot Mirror


Comparison of Working at the 3 Big Search Giants

castironwok writes "Finally, everything you've ever wanted to know about being an employee at Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo. Tastyresearch describes his (or her) past few years interning and working at the three companies. Things I didn't know from before: Bill Gates wears old shoes, Google's internal security watches you like a hawk, the office styles of each company, and how to fill your suitcase with Google T-shirts. He calls the few select companies the 'prestigious internship circle', noting 'once you have worked at one, it's a lot easier to get into another'."

179 comments

  1. big three? by superwiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft? There are people who use MSN for searching? Name two.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    1. Re:big three? by Nanidin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyone computer illiterate whose default homepage is MSN...

    2. Re:big three? by RichPowers · · Score: 4, Informative

      Remember that MSN.com is the second most visited website. This will draw some search traffic.

      Here's the breakdown:

      Google - 43.7%
      Yahoo - 28.8%
      MSN - 12.8%

      http://seo.zunch.com/search_engine_usage_statistic s.htm

      While MSN trails Yahoo and Google, it's still in the top three. Other websites rank the engines in the same order, but the percentages slightly vary.

    3. Re:big three? by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Funny

      There are people who use MSN for searching? Name two.

      Lincoln 6 Echo and Jordan 2 Delta in the movie "The Island". Oh, you meant REAL people? Sorry...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:big three? by physicsboy500 · · Score: 2, Funny

      True... I don't think that even an MSN search could turn up an MSN search user!

      --
      The original generic sig.
    5. Re:big three? by Ullteppe · · Score: 1

      Bill G., Steve B.

    6. Re:big three? by timeOday · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While we're throwing out percentages, my biggest surprise reading the article was something I could have just looked up: the market cap of google is about 50% that of microsoft, and over 300% that of yahoo! It amazes me that within just a few years, an ad-sponsored website (yes, that's all google is) could reach half of Microsoft's size!

    7. Re:big three? by sharkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Guy at my $ORKPLACE has MSN set as his homepage. Whenever he needs to browse a website, he opens IE, types "google" into the MSN search box and hits ENTER. Once at Google, he searches for whatever it is he is looking for.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    8. Re:big three? by Teresita · · Score: 5, Funny

      Guy at my $ORKPLACE has MSN set as his homepage. Whenever he needs to browse a website, he opens IE, types "google" into the MSN search box and hits ENTER. Once at Google, he searches for whatever it is he is looking for.

      This is exactly like sitting in a Yugo as it is dropped straight down into a Mustang convertable, and then busting out the windshield of the Yugo so you can shift.

    9. Re:big three? by staeiou · · Score: 1

      Microsoft? There are people who use MSN for searching? Name two.

      My mother and my father. Their homepage is still the default one Microsoft gave them, and they don't want to switch to Google or Firefox. MSN is effectively the default search on Windows computers.

    10. Re:big three? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      duhh, Ms. Dewey

    11. Re:big three? by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      The old ladies at my office actually load up Internet Explorer, which loads MSN.com, then use the search field to type www.yahoo.com to get to Yahoo.

      And I do tech support for these people. I have horror stories.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    12. Re:big three? by elmarkitse · · Score: 1

      Ya-Who?

    13. Re:big three? by harry666t · · Score: 1

      In Poland it would go like this:

      Google - 95%
      Other search engines (not any of the "big three") - 4-5%
      Both Yahoo and MSN - less than 1%

      Why?

      While Google is a search engine, Yahoo and MSN are (mainly) portals. There are LOTS of web portals in Poland. WP, Onet, Interia, naming the most popular. No one needs Yahoo nor MSN.

    14. Re:big three? by westlake · · Score: 1, Insightful
      It amazes me that within just a few years, an ad-sponsored website (yes, that's all google is) could reach half of Microsoft's size!

      what goes up like a rocket can come down like a rocket.

    15. Re:big three? by batkiwi · · Score: 0, Troll

      Microsoft is HUGE in corporate search, don't forget. Much larger than google.

    16. Re:big three? by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      The old ladies at my office actually load up Internet Explorer, which loads MSN.com, then use the search field to type www.yahoo.com to get to Yahoo.

            They probably just type yahoo.com )or maybe even just yahoo) which would also work. This may be quicker than bringing up a Favorites menu and clicking in there. It's a lot more convenient and what I do in Google with I Feel Lucky for ad hoc site visits.

        rd

    17. Re:big three? by Kuciwalker · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, Google isn't just one ad-sponsored website; it's a million ad-sponsored websites. Half the internet uses Adsense.

    18. Re:big three? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Market cap is one thing, revenue and profits are another. Based on the most recent quarterly reports, Microsoft is still ~4x Google in those areas, but that's still good for Google. Yahoo's last quarterly report was bad; Microsoft and Google made 12 times and 3 times more profit thatn did Yahoo.

    19. Re:big three? by ATMD · · Score: 1

      I doubt they know the Favourites menu exists.

      People like this are scared to click *anything* in a program that they don't use on an hourly basis.

      --
      Nobody else has this sig.
    20. Re:big three? by jthill · · Score: 1

      Remember that MSN.com is the second most visited website.

      When was the last time you watched what happens when you type just the hostname (sans `http://`) into IE6's address bar?

      --
      As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
    21. Re:big three? by ghjm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't make the mistake of equating market capitalization to "size."

      Google has $10 billion in assets, $6 billion in revenues and 10,000 employees. Yahoo! has $10 billion in assets, $5 billion in revenues and 11,000 employees. Microsoft, on the other hand, has $70 billion in assets, $44 billion in revenues, and 71,000 employees.

      Google's market capitalization means that overall, the market has spent $144 billion in cash in order to own Google's $10 billion in assets. The market believes that somehow, it will make future profits with a current value over $134 billion.

      To do this, Google would either have to start paying dividends within a few years, and pay out an amount well in excess of the company's total assets every year for 20+ years; or it would have to see revenue growth such that the company turns a profit 5 or 10 times better than the best Microsoft has ever done.

      None of these scenarios are remotely plausible; the market has clearly overvalued Google. As such, the market cap figure is not very useful for valuation or market-strategic purposes.

      -Graham

    22. Re:big three? by MindKata · · Score: 0

      "what goes up like a rocket can come down like a rocket."

      Unless it goes so far up like a rocket, that it ends up staying in orbit.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    23. Re:big three? by saigon_from_europe · · Score: 1

      I do something very similar.

      If I want to go to some site which is not in my bookmarks, story goes like this. I launch Firefox. I get Google page. Focus is already in the Google instead to be at URL field. If I type name there, I dont have to move to URL field and I can simply hit Enter. If I mistype the name, Google will correct me. If I decide to type in URL field, I would have to change the focus, if I miss the name I will have to try again etc... It's much simpler to let Google to take care of the correct name and TLD.

      --
      No sig today.
    24. Re:big three? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When a few indicators and fundamentals have lined up, on at least three occasions in the last year, I considered selling GOOG. However, it was rare to see a significant retracement, and had I traded at those prices my shorts would be bleeding majorly. Still, I am considering stocking up on Put options for the reasons you mention.

      Remember the performance of SUNW, RHAT, and even MSFT. Google's stock price will come back down to earth soon.

    25. Re:big three? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Apparently you need to realize that 'market cap' != size. I can point to a number of companies with amazing market caps that died a painful death.

    26. Re:big three? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Guy at my $ORKPLACE has MSN set as his homepage. Whenever he needs to browse a website, he opens IE, types "google" into the MSN search box and hits ENTER. Once at Google, he searches for whatever it is he is looking for.

      Let me guess.. he also says Nanoo nanoo?

    27. Re:big three? by silentounce · · Score: 1

      You know what else is funny? "yahoo" is one of the top search queries on google, and vice versa.

      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
  2. Interesting random fact by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yahoo prefers one 24" monitor compared to the dual setup at Microsoft and Goolgle(19" and 20" respectively) Considering that most 24" LCDs cost at least as much if not more than a pair of smaller ones, I wonder why they opted for less screen real estate(also interesting to me since I am in the market to upgrade displays and am debating between the two setups as well)

    1. Re:Interesting random fact by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 3, Funny

      It needs less video card ram and power the drive one screen then it takes to drive 2 also SLI and cross fire only work with one.

    2. Re:Interesting random fact by somekids · · Score: 1

      Go with dual monitors, you won't be disappointed. Besides (if my math is not wrong): 24^2/2 = 288 19^2/2+20^2/2 = 380.5 Which is at least 30% more viewing room. (and don't forgot SupCom on dual monitors :)

    3. Re:Interesting random fact by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Considering that most 24" LCDs cost at least as much if not more than a pair of smaller ones, I wonder why they opted for less screen real estate

      That is odd. At work we upgraded to dual 19" LCDs a few months ago and I can say there is a huge difference. I *feel* more productive because I spend less time bouncing between windows. I find it especially useful when coding, be it web or applications. You can have your code full on one screen, then the resulting webpage or documentation on the other. I think that a third monitor would be even better, having three full screens for different parts of a project. With one huge monitor you can't arrange windows as easily as you can with smaller monitors where you can just maximize the two or three windows you are working with. (An aside: if you have multiple monitors on Windows, you must try Ultramon. Worth every penny.)

      I don't understand why anyone would want a 24" monitor for work. Watching movies maybe, but not the day-to-day stuff. Somebody who just started doing research at the university where I work got dual 24" LCDs with his new $8,000 workstation. For the cost of those two monitors he could have gotten three 20" LCDs, which would have given him more desktop space and (in my opinion) a much more useful setup. He just thought two 24" beasts sitting side by side would look frakking cool. He's right, but I still prefer multiple smaller monitors.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    4. Re:Interesting random fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IAY ... the single 24's are more for visual / graphics designers. I snagged an extra 20" so I have a dual setup... dual == awesome for programmers. big == awesome for graphics people. laptops == awesome for managerial people. They came around asking if I wanted a 24 but I told them I preferred the dual setup.

      Unfortunately this article rings a bit true w.r.t bureaucracy @ yahoo... 10k people and 500m unique visitors per month across every language / continent / country is a bit tricky to "just do it" so some of the bureaucracy is necessary, but IMHO, I could due with a bit less.

      Jr'er uvevat: uggc://pnerref.lnubb.pbz/ ... fzneg crbcyr ner nyjnlf jrypbzr.

      --Robert

    5. Re:Interesting random fact by nernie · · Score: 1

      Umm, last I checked, all Google engineers used dual 24" monitors. I'd check your information source.

    6. Re:Interesting random fact by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      The information source was the article....

    7. Re:Interesting random fact by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      24" monitors? I've been using a 37" TV lately. It's great, and I think it was inexpensive by comparison with a large monitor that was made for PC use.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    8. Re:Interesting random fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I currently work there (but not in the Mountain View office) and I got two ... 22" screens, I think. All I know is they're freakin' huge and I'm thinking of rotating one of them by 90 degrees and see if I can use the space more efficiently like that.

      Oh, wait, I just checked the EDID stuff ... Seems to be 24" indeed. :-)

    9. Re:Interesting random fact by nernie · · Score: 1

      Ah, sorry for directing that at you. Didn't mean to come across like that and i have now read TFA. Well, so maybe they had dual 19 or 20s when he was there, but it's changed since then. Does anybody know if the MS and Yahoo info is still accurate?

    10. Re:Interesting random fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? Are they writing code, or playing Doom3?

    11. Re:Interesting random fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yahoo used to either let you have one (larger) monitor or dual monitors. However everyone I work with has a primary laptop and a secondary bsd box so:
      -They can dual screen using the laptop. Otherwise they'd need to run a monitor off the vga output (the base station has a dvi out as well as vga) which on my laptop is worse than shit (constant interference). Likely I just got a bum laptop but who knows.
      -There'd likely get an amusing KVM hell with dual monitors.

      You may still be able to get dual monitor instead and I've seen some dual 21 inch setups so *shrug*.

    12. Re:Interesting random fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why have 1 24" or 2 19" when you can have this -> http://www.stargamer.net/DSC00147.JPG I find it so much more productive, when i virtually never have to alt-tab windows, And spreading eclipse or visual studio over multiple monitors is lush.

    13. Re:Interesting random fact by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      With most 24" widescreen LCDs the max resolution is 1920x1200, with most 19" widescreen monitors the max resolution is 1440x900. Regular 19" monitors (not widescreen) have a more sane 1280x1024 resolution. Personally, I'd rather have one large high resolution display over two smaller lower resolution displays, but that's just me.

    14. Re:Interesting random fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yahoo employee here.

      You can have whatever you want for monitors. Actually I don't know where this 24" monitor came from since I never see them on anyone's desk. Most engineers seem to have dual 20 inch monitors. Or in my case, a Powerbook next to a 20".

    15. Re:Interesting random fact by marcog123 · · Score: 1

      I just recently completed an internship at Google in Zurich (Switzerland) and we had dual 24" monitors. The guys in Mountain View though have dual 21" or around there.

    16. Re:Interesting random fact by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      What window manager can organize a massive single desktop effectively?

      Having two smaller desktops with windows maximized on each is better than trying to get 2 windows arranged efficiently on one big monitor.

    17. Re:Interesting random fact by Saige · · Score: 1

      It varies through Microsoft depending on what's available and what people prefer. When I started there, I had onw 19" LCD screen. About two months later, I managed to get my PC upgraded to handle 2 monitors, and found a 19" CRT to add on, and used that for the 2 1/2 years. When I switched jobs, I wasn't able to take much with me, so I had to find new monitors - started out with a pair of 21" CRTs, and managed to replace one with a LCD, and hopefully the second soon too. I've seen people with nice widescreen displays, someone down the hall with three monitors, etc. Most people have two 19" or 21" screens.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    18. Re:Interesting random fact by noidentity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More advantages of two smaller monitors (hypothetical, as I only use one CRT monitor):
      * If one fails, you still have the other in the meantime.
      * You can upgrade them separately
      * If you ever need another monitor for another machine, you have it
      * You can turn one off if you're doing light work
      * Smaller flat-panels are probably cheaper per square inch, because of a lower defect rate and higher demand (more volume of product)

    19. Re:Interesting random fact by nova_ostrich · · Score: 1

      The Yahoo info is still correct. Developers can request a 24" widescreen LCD.

      --
      It's scary being a Flash and Flex developer on Slashdot. You guys are unnaturally rabid.
    20. Re:Interesting random fact by akpoff · · Score: 1

      For 3D you're right about the card but for 2D any card on the market today can handle it -- which for most desktop-productivity jobs is where the action is. Now as to power, you may be right that one 24" monitor uses less.

    21. Re:Interesting random fact by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      I can say that having three 19" monitors helps immensely with productivity. I have task lists or specs docs in the left screen, application in the middle, email or browser on the right. It's far more efficient than uncovering windows or clicking on the taskbar and waiting for the app to show. And, and, I never use it for prOn, that would just not be right.

    22. Re:Interesting random fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can it possibly be better to have your window sizes dictated by the physical boundary of the monitors as opposed to choosing how to split the space yourself? If you're looking for a windowmanager that can easily split your screen at whatever ratio you desire, hava a look at ion, but nowadays most windowmanagers are smart enough to drop to drop windows in free spaces, which works very well for me with my xterms defaulting to about 1/4 of the screen, and browsers and just abount everything else about 1/2 the screen width.

      With two 19" monitors at 1280x1024, you get insicnificantly more pixels (only about 13% more) as compared to a 24" monitor, but lose all the flexibility of having all of them in a contiguous area.

    23. Re:Interesting random fact by LauraW · · Score: 1

      Umm, last I checked, all Google engineers used dual 24" monitors.

      True, mostly. Most of us have dual 24" monitors. (I just switched mine into portrait orientation because I was getting neck strain from my desktop being so wide. :-) I keep my IDE on one monitor and everything else on the other one. But I know some people who prefer to use just one, some who have three 20" monitors and so on. They'll give us anything we ask for, within reason. It's very nice, after working at companies that were either too cheap or too bureaucratic to give engineers the tools they needed to do their jobs.

    24. Re:Interesting random fact by toddestan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *Also, you can throw one of them on a second computer by a KVM (or by using the multiple input capabilities of some monitors) and view the output of two computers at once.
      *You can have one be a CRT and other be an LCD and get the best of both worlds.

    25. Re:Interesting random fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Standard engineer issue at Google was a pair of 21s until a year or so ago. Now, it's a pair of 24s.

    26. Re:Interesting random fact by vidarh · · Score: 1

      I can't stand working on large screens or using multiple screens. Good keybindings and all maximized windows combined with apps using tabs works much better for me. I switch between apps or tabs in a single app with quick key combinations, and don't have to change my focus or turn my head all the time. But then I have always had a very clear picture of the things I work with - I can visualize the files of most of the projects in our subversion repository that I've spent time on to the point where I can picture the on screen shape of specific classes and functions for example - so I really don't need to have things on screen as long as access is fast.

    27. Re:Interesting random fact by kingturkey · · Score: 1

      Your calculations are wrong because monitors are measured along the diagonal and you're assuming that the size provided is the height/width and that they are square, neither of which is true. You can't actually calculate a moniter's screen area from just the diagonal, you need to know the ratio. As well as that, diagonals of the screens on CRTs aren't actually the size specified as the measurement is from the edges of the frames whereas LCDs don't have bulky frames around the screen. I don't feel like doing the calculations right now but this page provides the information necessary to calculate the screen area and other things about monitors of various sizes.

    28. Re:Interesting random fact by ConfusedVorlon · · Score: 1

      I love my 3 monitor setup.

      on the left I have a widescreen monitor rotated 90degrees (to profile layout)
      -perfect for my documentation in pdf, or for viewing my site in dreamweaver as it gives me lots of height to my window

      centre monitor (20in) is my main coding window.
      -Either codewarrior or Komodo go here

      right monitor is for misc stuff
      -file explorer windows, ssh, desktop search, skype, etc

      all held up to viewing height by an ergotron 3 monitor stand.

    29. Re:Interesting random fact by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      My favorite thing to do in these situations is get multiple monitors and put them in portrait mode. You are able to maintain closer to a normal aspect ratio than something silly like 5120x1600 - 3200x2560 is much easier.

  3. Trade secrets? by BronsCon · · Score: 0

    'once you have worked at one, it's a lot easier to get into another'
    I'm sure that has nothing to do with the plethora (sp?) of trade secrets you may, possibly, have learned while interning for the competition?
    Perhaps, some jewel of knowledge a previous intern either didn't have or wouldn't give up?

    Nah, it's not that. These companies are far, far too honest for that.
    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  4. I've worked at all three... here's my take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I worked at Yahoo, I had to say things like "Doinky doink" to my boss and paint my face green on one side and white on the other since I was the guy in charge of the Saskatchewan part of Yahoo...wherever the hell Saskatchewan is...anyway... the people in the cubes next to me where chimpanzees but they wore "Richard Nixon" halloween masks.
    When I worked a Microsoft, I had to wear a suit, but the suit was in camoflage colours. My supervisor (I never did find out his name, I only knew him as "XZ95") was in charge of BTLIME.DLL, the subroutine that made sure that the system clock didn't accidentally exceed the number "6"...a big responsibility.
    Finally, I got a job at Google... I don't know how it's going because I've spent all my time trying to win the "special day" competition to remake the "Google" web page logo on those "special days"

    Thanks for listening

    1. Re:I've worked at all three... here's my take by Lordpidey · · Score: 1

      I don't know how it's going because I've spent all my time trying to win the "special day" competition to remake the "Google" web page logo on those "special days"

      Oh, so YOU are the guy who changed my homepage to googe.

      --
      Some people encrypt by using rot-13 twice. I prefer the more secure method of using rot-1 a total of twenty six times.
    2. Re:I've worked at all three... here's my take by nanio · · Score: 1
  5. Maybe a tamed, blind hawk? by kaigeX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Google's internal security watches you like a hawk"

    Uhh...no. I walk around with my badge concealed, explicitly to see how much of a problem it causes, and I have been stopped less than a handful of times this year, and probably less than twenty last year. (Barring events that are explicitly high-security.)

    1. Re:Maybe a tamed, blind hawk? by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're so badass.

    2. Re:Maybe a tamed, blind hawk? by robably · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or you could look at it from the point of view that "security" has become so pervasive and commonplace in your life that you no longer think it unusual to be stopped 20 times a year...

    3. Re:Maybe a tamed, blind hawk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice... Mountain Dew all over the keyboard again.

    4. Re:Maybe a tamed, blind hawk? by kaigeX · · Score: 1

      20 times a year doesn't seem like a lot to me. How many times do you think you'd be stopped walking around NSA without a badge?

    5. Re:Maybe a tamed, blind hawk? by robably · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How many times do you think you'd be stopped walking around NSA without a badge?
      If they were any good, then just once.
    6. Re:Maybe a tamed, blind hawk? by Assassin+bug · · Score: 1

      I interned at a major hybrid seed (as in corn seed) company for a year. The security didn't might if you hid your badge because its passive transducer allowed them to track every doorway you passed through.

    7. Re:Maybe a tamed, blind hawk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's a little different than public security/police you know. The security guys are on the look out for door jumpers, gate crashers and all sorts of snoops trying to figure out what is going on.

      After all, when there are 3 google stories in 6 on slashdot today, all that scrunity also applies to real life.

      I always felt the google security guys were on our side. They are there to make the work safe, keep unauthorized people out (so I dont get shit stolen, etc), and generally just BE there.

    8. Re:Maybe a tamed, blind hawk? by westlake · · Score: 1
      I walk around with my badge concealed, to see how much of a problem it causes...I have been stopped less than a handful of times this year, and probably less than twenty last year

      so you are saying you are stopped every other week for being a horse's ass?

    9. Re:Maybe a tamed, blind hawk? by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or more likely, that security is so pervasive and commonplace in his life that they just remember him and only had to ask for his badge that first time. I know if I were assigning security I'd keep people in the same areas as much as possible for this reason exactly -- If security knows all the faces that should be there daily, theres much less room for 'unwanted guests' slipping through.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    10. Re:Maybe a tamed, blind hawk? by kaigeX · · Score: 1

      Yes, because being curious about security makes one a horse's ass. You must be real popular here.

    11. Re:Maybe a tamed, blind hawk? by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      Best answer ever :)

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    12. Re:Maybe a tamed, blind hawk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrast that with MS where the only security guard I've ever seen is on the floor of the building where Bill Gates works...

    13. Re:Maybe a tamed, blind hawk? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      keep unauthorized people out (so I dont get shit stolen, etc)

      Haha. I think it's hilarious that you think the biggest threat to your wallet, iPod, CDs, notebook, checkbook, whatever, at work is some random yahoo sneaking past reception/corporate security, through your cubicle area unchallenged, and just swiping stuff off your desk.

      That's fantastic.

      Hint: your coworkers can steal, too.

    14. Re:Maybe a tamed, blind hawk? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      You're kidding, right?

      See all those Ford Escapes cruising campuses? Here's a hint, there's a reason why they have "Security" printed on the side.

    15. Re:Maybe a tamed, blind hawk? by silentounce · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you've never seen Face Off. If they stop and check they can tell their voices are different. Amateur.

      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
  6. Only for Interns by lancejjj · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Finally, everything you've ever wanted to know about being an employee at Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo. ... based on a few weeks of experience of an intern.

    This is intersting information for someone who is looking to be an intern, but that's about it.
    1. Re:Only for Interns by skoaldipper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe, but not necessarily. Some subtle observations can define corporate culture or even their mission statements.

      For example, I actually met Sam Walton a few times back in the 80s while working for him. He drove an old beat up 50s vintage Ford pickup, and he dressed in overalls and a plain white t-shirt. He was frugal even for being the richest man in the world at the time. Also, while working for Ross Perot at EDS, I had to follow a very strict dress code; no hair below the collar, no beards, plain color button collared shirt, dress slacks, and tie. And all I did was run around on rollerskates changing out tapes in the library for mainframes. From CEO to janitor, a professional image was expected at all times; in part because government officials frequented the place.

      --
      I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
    2. Re:Only for Interns by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      You fuckers got skates? All we got were deadlines.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  7. all great places by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Al have interesting work, good pay, interesting areas to live. "May you be cursed with job offers from all three" and have to decide :-)

    1. Re:all great places by kaigeX · · Score: 1, Interesting

      ...but who would choose Microsoft from that mix? o_O

    2. Re:all great places by Rycross · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More than you would think. Most of the hiring managers I meet consider it very high prestige.

    3. Re:all great places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really smart people, world renowned research labs, better pay, no cubicles, no kool-aid feeling like you get at google, no stupid cameras everywhere...

    4. Re:all great places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's because you don't meet the ones who circular file your resume and never call you back.

    5. Re:all great places by Javagator · · Score: 1

      I would not have until I read the TFA. I would choose an office over cubes, despite all the free food and perks in the world.

    6. Re:all great places by Skreems · · Score: 1

      I get the impression that Google doesn't value work/life balance as much as Microsoft. Not that they'll work you to exhaustion, but from everything I've read Google's philosophy is more, "work IS life", so they give you lots of perks that have the end result of you spending more time working. Microsoft may not do your drycleaning, but if you work there, work time is limited enough that you have time to go do it yourself (or go do whatever else you want).

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    7. Re:all great places by kaigeX · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have no problem keeping the hours I want at Google, and have never felt pressured to stay later. The fact that so many people freely choose to work longer hours definitely has something to do with the perks, but my impression is that it isn't really that Google doesn't value balance.

    8. Re:all great places by kaigeX · · Score: 1

      I have an office, and have since the day I started. So do a whole lot of people. Of course there *are* also cubes.

    9. Re:all great places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got an offer from Yahoo and Google the same week, one of the reasons I went for Google (with a much lower salary) was the 'prestige' as you say.

      If I had not left my previous company I would be an M$ employee right now, (they got acquired in the meantime). I never ever gave my resume to Microsoft because they are on my blacklist of companies not to work for (with eBay, NVidia, ...)

      So now Microsoft vs Google on a resume ... which one is better?

    10. Re:all great places by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      You miss something, though: you may never feel "pressured" to stay late, but that doesn't mean you not staying late isn't noticed, especially when everyone else in your team is.

      I'm one of the first on my team (at MSFT) in the morning, between 9 and 9.30. Most people cruise in 10, 10.30, even 11. I leave between 4 and 5 each day. Most of the rest leave around 6-7. My early leaving is noticed, but not a negative, because people know I'm in earlier.

    11. Re:all great places by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Cubes are generally only allocated to contingent staff. FTE's get offices as first priority. Dedicated or shared, based on group allocation and personal preference. Agency Temp (A Dash) staff are next, and Vendor (V Dash) staff lowest.

  8. Virus Lookout Express? by Saxophonist · · Score: 1

    The blogger's favorite Microsoft app is Outlook Express? Well, I guess given the choices...

  9. xbox? by sarathmenon · · Score: 0, Redundant

    He was handing out free xboxes in college before landing as an intern in Microsoft in 1994, That's the year that windows 95 was launched, I definitely do not remember seeing or hearing about xboxes at that time of the year.

    --
    Microsoft: "You've got questions. We've got dancing paperclips."
    1. Re:xbox? by anagama · · Score: 1

      Ok ya got me. How did you figure this out? After going back to the site, there is little identifying information about "tastyresearch".

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    2. Re:xbox? by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      Ok ya got me. How did you figure this out?

            The information given was incorrect. The blog says he (it sounded like a he) was an intern at Microsoft in 2004, 10 years later.

        rd

  10. I can name more than two... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    One of my sites receives approximately 2500 visitors from MSN searches each day. Mind you, Google tends to contribute upwards of 12000 every day, and Yahoo! about 4500.

  11. I'll bet! by eck011219 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    'once you have worked at one, it's a lot easier to get into another'

    This doesn't surprise me at all -- I'm sure you're seen as not only good enough to have worked at the other ones, but as a possible wealth of information about the workings of the others. And you're cheaper and lower-profile than hiring away the competition's bigger fish.
    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:I'll bet! by Onan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've only worked for two of the three (Yahoo to Google), but as far as I've seen _nobody_ wants you to disclose the inner workings of the others to them. This true on at least three levels that come to mind:

      - The competitive advantage of knowing about other companies' proprietary information is dwarfed by the liability of acquiring that information. Especially given that you'd be acquiring them through someone who had proven they could not be trusted to keep a secret.

      - At least Google has the (mostly deserved) hubris to assume that their own solutions to problems will tend to be as good as or better than other companies' solutions. So while other solutions may be academically interesting, they generally won't be useful.

      - Lastly and most significantly, it's unethical. And yes, every person with whom I've worked at either company would find this alone to be reason enough to refrain, even if it did grant a competitive advantage.

      Really, everyone would rather just hire competent, trustworthy people who will do their actual job well and with appropriate discretion. No one is looking for a stool pigeon.

    2. Re:I'll bet! by eck011219 · · Score: 1

      All good points. I stand corrected!

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  12. Big, not popular! by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    The MS one is big because its running IIS on Vista.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  13. The best line of the article by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Apparently the answer to "Can you tell me what was the most difficult bug you faced while programming and what you did to resolve it?" isn't "My programs don't have bugs." Too funny. I think I really started to mature as a programmer when I realized that I actually *don't* know all the answers, that *everyone* makes mistakes, and it's foolish to let pride get in the way of asking someone for help or admitting you had absolutely no clue about something (instead of trying to bluff your way through).

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    1. Re:The best line of the article by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Agreed on the asking questions.

      My worst bug comes, oddly enough, from the time I was still in university. I was writing a shell in my operating systems class using lex and yacc. For some cases, it would just completely crap out.

      It should be noted that gdb did not play with yacc at all at the time (I don't know if it does now or not). I literally had to print out the source code and go down with a pencil line by line. Turns out that I made a typo. I accidently had a $2 where I should have had a $3 or the other way around. It took a couple of hours to track down.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  14. Pretty good actually by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 5, Funny
    Well that's pretty high security for most places. Where I work there's a badge-on-display policy but I have not worn my badge in the last ten years.

    When I worked in the military everyone was supposed to have badge-on-display and everybody was supposed to look at badges all the time. The top security guy rigged a test: He had an arbitrary soldier replace his picture with one of a baboon. He walked past security points at least 6 times a day and was only discovered after 6 months when he dropped his card and people had a really close look at it.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Pretty good actually by rossifer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The top security guy rigged a test: He had an arbitrary soldier replace his picture with one of a baboon. He walked past security points at least 6 times a day and was only discovered after 6 months when he dropped his card and people had a really close look at it.
      Similar story at Texas Instruments. To get into a TI building, you're supposed to have an electronic or visual inspection of your badge. Where we worked in Sugarland, TX, they used a visual inspection station (you put your badge over a video camera and the security guy in some security office remotely "verifies" your badge). But this happened so quickly, we knew they weren't doing anything more than glancing at the badge.

      One of the interns (red badge, meant less than 5 years senority back in the 1990's) thought they probably weren't even doing that. So he taped the front of a small box of Sun-Maid raisins over his badge. And used it like that for six months. Was only caught because we were laughing so hard about it at lunch one day while his boss was walking by, and the cat was out of the bag. The security office actually got in trouble, not the intern, and I don't think they use the visual inspection stations any more.

      Regards,
      Ross
    2. Re:Pretty good actually by switcha · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would think you would want the top security guy doing more about the security problem besides a six-month implementation of "Operation Adhesive Primate" to show off how bad things were.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    3. Re:Pretty good actually by Bob54321 · · Score: 4, Funny

      By "arbitrary solder" did you mean "the soldier who looked most like a baboon"?

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    4. Re:Pretty good actually by grcumb · · Score: 2, Funny

      So he taped the front of a small box of Sun-Maid raisins over his badge. And used it like that for six months.

      Feh, that's nothing. I made a counterfeit badge for myself, changing the 'Mitel Networks' (i.e. my employer's) logo to 'Myhell Networks'. Not only did I never get caught, but I never even got disciplined for having the same image flapping merrily in the OpenGL breeze as my screen-saver.

      Did I mention that my unit had absolutely fantastic management? They invested trust in us, and relied on everyone to be creative, to challenge assumptions and to work hard. We were glad to do all that, and more. There's a moral in there somewhere....

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    5. Re:Pretty good actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they WERE looking at the badge, and were simply assuming he was the President.

    6. Re:Pretty good actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I work there's a badge-on-display policy but I have not worn my badge in the last ten years.
      Anonymous because I think this is an embarrassing statement. We have thousands who really do display and check badges because, it's understood, that security can't keep the homeless out otherwise.
  15. MSN Search is terrible. by Kaenneth · · Score: 4, Informative

    At my last contract job at MS, I really tried to use MSN search...

    Sometimes the site wouldn't even load, sometimes clicking on search results would fail (because the click-tracking would fail), sometimes the main MSN site would show an server error. Each of these things were rare, but given how many things have to happen to complete a search task, overall I would estimate a 10% failure rate, to get any results at all.

    Meanwhile, Google ALWAYS works. I have never once seen Google fail to load, or produce proper results. If Google doesn't load, I know it's my local network that's the problem.

    Maybe it's the Parallel nature of Google's configuration vs. the apperently Serial setup of MSN. If a machine at Google fails, it dosn't affect much else, while one failure at MSN breaks the chain.

    1. Re:MSN Search is terrible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, Google ALWAYS works. I have never once seen Google fail to load, or produce proper results. If Google doesn't load, I know it's my local network that's the problem.

      They're not bulletproof. I get error pages from google.com maybe once two months. Their less-used services, like GMail and GMaps, are a little worse.

      Of course, that's still a pretty good record. Google is pretty good at delivering their services; just not perfect.

  16. Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google's internal security watches you like a hawk

    I wonder why?

     

    how to fill your suitcase with Google T-shirts

    Oh, that would explain it.
    1. Re:Security by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      They're watching for tailgaters. The Mountain View complex is entirely open, and there have been big problems in the past with employees of other companies wandering over to use the free canteens - not to mention trying to get into TGIF. If it was like most office buildings where there was one main entrance it wouldn't be necessary, and indeed in the Zurich office there are no guards.

  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. how fast things change by heroine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    2000 is a distant memory. In 2000, VA Linux and Redhat were the it companies. Work at one and you could work at the other and the world would kill tthemselves for your autograph. Now no-one even knows what VA Linux was and Redhat is a troll. Hard to believe in 4 years we'll probably forget what Google was.

    1. Re:how fast things change by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Compare the max market cap of Redhat and VA combined, and then look at Google's current one. Look at Google's profits, and then look at the max profits of those two combined.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    2. Re:how fast things change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And look at the products. Google can easily lose market if something better show up. And it can be imminent. However it's not easy to build a name around whole operation system.

    3. Re:how fast things change by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Yeah good theory--the Linux distribution space is extremely diluted.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    4. Re:how fast things change by jsight · · Score: 1

      Redhat is a troll? Er, what?

      I'd say a lot of people would still love to get the Red Hat job!

  19. Worst Typo Ever by this+great+guy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The guy wrote "horderves" to mean "hors d'uvres".

    1. Re:Worst Typo Ever by this+great+guy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      [Beh... apparently slashdot ate my ligature oe as well as the single quote.] The guy wrote "h'orderves" to mean "hors d'oeuvres".

    2. Re:Worst Typo Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy wrote "hors d'uvres" to mean "hors d'oeuvres".

    3. Re:Worst Typo Ever by grimJester · · Score: 1

      Just go with "freedom doers". Simple and patriotic!

    4. Re:Worst Typo Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Au contraire, I think the article commenter description of Steve Balmer(sic) as "self richeous" trumps it.

  20. So by jrldh2 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Now we know that he values perks and the showy stuff. Good luck chatting, networking and backstabbing your way up the 9 levels of management at Yahoo. Where I work there are no super stars, no free anything but I can come and go whenever I want (9 to 5 is no problem, too), get a really good reliable paycheck and most importantly the work is interesting and unpretentious. No need to sacrifice my private life for an endless string of office parties and chic gossip.

    1. Re:So by torrentfuze · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's more that he's not allowed to talk about his work. I sure don't want to hear about .NET/COM/ATL programming at Microsoft, and would rather read about the food and culture. Do I sense a twinge of jealousy?

    2. Re:So by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure he is.

      I agree with him/her mainly. I personally don't care about these "perks". I get the impressions they are tools to keep workers working longer and more often.

      I don't care about the social structure a company would try and provide for me. They can't possibly create a social atmosphere beyond work that is even close to my life.

      However, I assume there is corporate politics and backstabbing at every company.

      But I don't need toys (why waste time at work? Why stay longer than I have to?) or free drinks (I bring water thank you) or free lunches (well, that could be nice. But I like to get out. Companies like to keep you around) and corporate prizes (I have enough junk). I like a good check (Google lacks here), flex-time and the expectation that I will only be working no more than 40 hours a week. Oh, and lots of vacation.

      Google allowing programmers 20% of their tie to work on personal projects is a nice perk, to be sure.

      I guess the parent is saying, it's still work. You're still at work. Would you rather be at work than out with your friends or doing your own thing? If the answer is no then you need to get a life.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    3. Re:So by jrldh2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You mean envy? No. But I realize that those freebies are there to keep you at work. I guess I am getting old but I am just not impressed by that stuff anymore. I was when I was in my 20ies and early 30ies. Time flies and I am super glad that I don't have a job that consumes me and my life. Reading this story, I just got the vibes of a super giddy 20 year old interning at prestigious workplaces who probably will end up giving way to much time of his/her life to a corporation while lifes passes by him/her. It is very telling that Google pays little and has obnoxious security. Where I work, security consists of the friendly receptionist and not of some uniformed drones that make it clear that you are not to be trusted. Do no evil. Just like fair and balanced. Cheap words.

    4. Re:So by unother · · Score: 1

      Cheers, mate. Words of wisdom!

    5. Re:So by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      It's always nice to see someone with their head firmly on their shoulders instead of getting giddy over the "we want you to work 70 hours" freebies.

      I like software dev, but I also value my life. This is coming from a 20-something who has already done the startup thing.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    6. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should you be trusted? Why should your employer trust you? Why should your coworkers trust you?

    7. Re:So by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      This is why its a good idea to avoid "hot" companies and industries. They will pay you less and work you harder. I would rather be paid for my work in dollars rather than prestige.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
  21. Security IDs are pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think that IDs give a false sense of security: here is why...

    I did a little experiment at my old job that required an ID be displayed...I just wore it backwards...all that was on the back was a company logo and RFID chip to open the main door and the data center: never once did security ask to see the picture and credentials that I was concealing...

    Our High school (2000-2004) made us wear IDs, the kids from the catholic school down the street would use IDs from the previous year or IDs that others had "lost" to sneak in and at lunch with their friends at our local public school...almost never getting busted. even by random ID checks that the lunch cashiers did.

    The place I work now doesn't have IDs, just a magnetic card that you swipe to get in the secure doors after hours...there is not a security problem because everyone knows enough other people that if you cant answer a few questions in a casual conversation, you will be busted in 10 minutes...questions like "new here? welcome aboard, what position are you filling?" and "oh, who manages that dept?"...that is the place where I have felt the SAFEST...

  22. Sounds Terrible by nate+nice · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These places sound great in theory but the more you think about it, the more phony and limiting they become.

    Consider that they provide all of these resources to keep you on their campus as long as possible. Their entire goal is to squeeze as much work out of you they can while prolonging the time it will take you to burn out. They create their own small community you're expected to be a part of at almost all times.

    Maybe I'm in the minority but my work isn't my life. I enjoy what I do but I don't stay at the office any long than I have to. I have friends to see, places to go and personal endeavors to get to that don't involve my company. I don't want my recreational activities to be sponsored by or provided by my company. I'm not sure I want to work in a place that "optionally" provides these facilities as they become expectations of the employees and those that shun them become outcast by their coworkers.

    It's like if you don't participate in as many work related activities as possible, you'll alienate yourself and not be part of the brainwashed masses at your company of choice.

    Maybe I'm old fashioned but I get to the office, I do my job and after about 8 hours or so I go on my way and do whatever I want to do. I get lunch with some friends at places of our choice. I'll even participate in work related and non-work related recreational activities with people. But it's not a way of life.

    I don't know, something about working for a company that has created facilities and devices to keep you occupied under their roof for as long as possible seems a little fishy. I don't trust companies like this. They don't have your best interest's in mind, like most companies, but try and create diversions from this. Many young geeks end up wasting their youth in this corporate socialism.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    1. Re:Sounds Terrible by Skreems · · Score: 1

      I get the feeling that Google is the worst as far as pushing you to stay longer. Their perks are all kinda slanted towards eliminating any reason for you to leave. Microsoft seems a lot more willing to let you walk out the door when you feel that you're done for the day, whenever that may be.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    2. Re:Sounds Terrible by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm old fashioned but I get to the office, I do my job and after about 8 hours or so I go on my way and do whatever I want to do.

            The perks are to attract and retain the best employees for those 8 hours or so.

        rd

    3. Re:Sounds Terrible by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I thought Google came over more than a little cult-like when I heard about their "Testing on the Toilet" initiative...

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:Sounds Terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I (anonymous coward) am a coder at yahoo. I am 27 and married and I think that you are right about these things. But yahoo is, at least in my group, very un-cultlike. I work 8 hours a day. We take one hour lunches. I generally don't socialize with my co-workers after work. The place is honestly a pretty good place to work. At the end of the day though it is just a company, not a cult. I love the products that come from google and apple, but I'm not sure I'd like to work there. At yahoo I get paid to do a specific job. I am not expected to be passionate about my job, just competent and have a positive attitude. Oh yeah. And we are hiring people like crazy, and the guy was right, know your algorithms.

    5. Re:Sounds Terrible by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Your comments are exactly how I feel. It totally has the feel of one of the cults or something in Utah where they invade every part of your life. And where if you don't dedicate your entire existence to them, you're looked at as a sick person who needs help. This of course results in even more "care", etc from your new cult overlords.

      I can imagine it's the kind of place where every time you answer a question about yourself, you're then told of the "Company X" way.

      Maybe we're too cynical but i don't think so. Working in an environment with many geeks, I can see the ones that would fall for this bait. They would eat it up and be brainwashed immediately. Like young Neo-Nazi's or other cultists, they would immediately destroy their individuality and try and become part of the....Borg....as soon as possible.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    6. Re:Sounds Terrible by Southphillyman · · Score: 0

      Excellent point

    7. Re:Sounds Terrible by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Is that truly the intention?

      I have a hard time believing that. Video games, toys, free foods (which might actually help their health care plans really) and other recreational activities are just there for fun? To create a diversion for a hard worker?

      It seems like the common goal of each of these devices is to keep a person on the corporate campus for as much of their time as possible. This way, the company becomes their life and they feel more of an attachment to the company than a typical 9-5er. It's the hive now instead of a place to work.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    8. Re:Sounds Terrible by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      It seems like the common goal of each of these devices is to keep a person on the corporate campus for as much of their time as possible. This way, the company becomes their life and they feel more of an attachment to the company than a typical 9-5er. It's the hive now instead of a place to work.

            The coolness factor to hire in the best minds far outweigh the hive stuff. People can log in from home when a crunch is on, they don't need to be in the hive to work long hours.

            There's a need for worker bees too. But rarely is good software delivered without a long hard slog by some queen bees.

        rd

    9. Re:Sounds Terrible by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      The other thing that a lot of people miss is the strategic use of the word "campus".

      The use of the words corporate campus are often an attempt to make people forget they are at work. If they call it a campus, they can trick people into working an insane schedule like half of us did in college.

      It's never a corporate office or corporate compound. It's always a campus.

      It's an interesting psychological ploy.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    10. Re:Sounds Terrible by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      I agree. Why not just call it what it is: A software factory.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    11. Re:Sounds Terrible by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      I'd assume the best minds generally are working for their own company or for a university.

      Not that places like MS and Google don't have some great employees (most successful businesses do), but lets kill the corporate tag line here used to convince their workers they are somehow lucky to be employed. The company I work for claims to hire "great employees" but it's clearly a lie. And any company I've walked into usually has about 10% great employees and the rest are easily replaceable. From what I've read, Google and MS are as full of poseurs as any other company. It's a bell curve like anything else.

      This goes for any company I've ever been to.

      So although it might make for nice corporate slogan or initiative, I'm not sure free candy, soda and food is going to attract the best of the best. If so, the best of the best are mighty shallow or easily tricked.

      As for being able to log in from home, what's the point?! Anywhere I've worked has VPN or equivalent access. Of course they do. They want you to work as much as possible. But does this make it not working because you're at home?! I never used it.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    12. Re:Sounds Terrible by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      So although it might make for nice corporate slogan or initiative, I'm not sure free candy, soda and food is going to attract the best of the best. If so, the best of the best are mighty shallow or easily tricked.

            I agree with this. And also that those great minds will become entrepreneurs sooner rather than later. It sounded like Google was trying to incubate that kind of initiative in house though. But everyone with a great idea should take their shot.

        rd

    13. Re:Sounds Terrible by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      People can log in from home when a crunch is on

      When there's a crunch, rightly or wrongly (and I think it's far from clear cut), most managers are going to want you "in the hive". You're accessible to your team members, for collaboration/idea sharing/review/meetings and such. Of course you can still 'participate' via telecommuting, but it's not comparable to the real thing. My team at MSFT has fifteen minute catchup meetings in stairwells every morning, etc, etc.

  23. Only for Mop-jockeys. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This is intersting information for someone who is looking to be an intern, but that's about it."

    I'm waiting to hear from the janitors.

  24. Criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha... making IE the default browser on Windows and counting the Home Page hits as searches doesn't make M$ jack shit in search except for the legacy thugs they've always been.

  25. A Yahoo! employee explains the single 24" monitor by nova_ostrich · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most Yahoo! employees get laptops. Most laptops can only connect a single external display.

    --
    It's scary being a Flash and Flex developer on Slashdot. You guys are unnaturally rabid.
  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. I'll bet!-A Fowl Suppository by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Really, everyone would rather just hire competent, trustworthy people who will do their actual job well and with appropriate discretion. No one is looking for a stool pigeon."

    The FBI is.

  28. I'm in the elitist outer ring by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    Since you've worked no where, no one will hire you for lack of experience. I laugh at jokes even when they're at my expense.

  29. Google research lab by reset_button · · Score: 1

    In his table, under "Research Lab", Google gets a "Not really". This guy has absolutely no idea about what he's talking about. Google has some of the most cutting-edge research in the industry. They almost always have research papers published at the conferences that I attend (so does MS, but Yahoo rarely does). Here are some examples.

  30. Research In Motion.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After reading this article over I realize just how much it sucks to work for RIM (www.rim.com). We don't get any perks like the any of these companies, hell the cafeteria in my building only has vending machines. Free? All we get now is water from coolers, very bad coffee, and a random piece of RIM clothing once a year. It's actually amusing to watch 6000 people walk around the RIM campus wearing the same jacket. :) Hell, they are so cheap for developers that I had to *fight* to expense a book on C++ network programming for a library I use everyday. The end deal was I could expense a new 30-40 dollar book every 2-3 months, which doesn't help me now :)

    Don't get me started on the cancellation of stock options for everyone in RIM since 2002, except for upper management of course.

    RIM = IBM pretending to be a start-up.

    Anyway, I just wish I had the problem of choosing between MS, Google, and Yahoo for a job. :) Maybe I should dust off the resume and start looking!

    1. Re:Research In Motion.... by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Start your own company. It doesn't take much in this industry and the rewards are much greater.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    2. Re:Research In Motion.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIM has the nickname Lawsuits In Motion for a reason so wouldn't even be worth the hassle. If Google, MS or Yahoo setup shop in Waterloo it would do more damage to the company than any products they could come up with, I'll just wait for that day :)

  31. no Google research lab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TFA is correct; Google has no research lab. Google's papers are based on Google's experiences building the world's largest distributed system. They are published for two reasons; first is that that is interesting to computer science researchers and second is that everyone loves Google. Google does have "Google Labs" but their responsibility is product development on Google's primary product, the Google search engine. Google has nothing that is comparable to (for example) Microsoft Research, which works on numerous different computer science problems, many of which do not have any immediate application in Microsoft's products.

  32. Re:A Yahoo! employee explains the single 24" monit by marcog123 · · Score: 1

    All Google software engineers get laptops. Plus the desktop!

  33. internet bubble again? by timmarhy · · Score: 1

    fuck working at a web company i'd much much rather work at MS. look at the perks and the pay its way over what the other give you? i'd kiss bill gates ass at every oppertunity

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  34. Wish I had this problem by tmortn · · Score: 1

    Interesting way to look at it. However, if you haven't figured it out already, most companies are trying to figure out how to suck the last erg of productivity from their workers. The bigger they are the worse this tendency is. I suppose what you are getting at is here there are examples of companies that have the audacity to attempt to make you like it. Frankly these kinds of efforts to suck me dry is a problem I wish existed with my employer.

    These kinds of perks are not evil underhanded attempts to suck the life from you. To me they are a company realizing it is OK for them to try and make you like working for them and hoping that in return they get more from you. It is a win win if you ask me. One of the worst fall outs from the late 90's dot bomb crash was that seriously desirable perks got lumped in right along with non-existent business plans or a real product as reasons for these companies failing. True enough some of the companies went overboard in this area but among the reasons for their failures the perks were by and large window dressing... they were an easily remembered excess. The Corporate workplace is due for a serious overhaul. The siege mentality of most cube hell workers is not a good thing. You want to talk about places designed to suck the life out of someone... It is well past time the work place was designed to be more lived in. Hell, we spend close to a 1/3rd of our adult lives in one. Why shouldn't work spaces be more comfortable and inviting?

    --
    I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    1. Re:Wish I had this problem by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      The thing is that a lot of those companies aren't hoping that you'll spend 70-80 hours a week working for them; they're expecting it.

      I've had interviews at places where the directors who were talking to me were highlighting that so many of their people were there until the wee hours of the morning. They were proud of this and trying to make it sound like the norm instead of the rare crunch time exception.

      To me, that's not something to be proud of. It screams that they push their people to early burn out as a business practice.

      There was even one where I was told point blank that they expected 70 hours a week even though they were only paying a salary based on 40 hours.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  35. Dumb Question by asphaltjesus · · Score: 1

    How do guys like this afford to do these internships? Are they paid? Does the bank of mommy and daddy pay the way?

    Seriously. I've got no bank of mom and dad, work and go to school. How do I do it when I'm the one who feeds/clothes myself?

    --
    Got Trader Joe's? friendwich.com RSS feeds work now!
    1. Re:Dumb Question by xaxa · · Score: 1

      They don't pay in the US? They certainly pay in the UK. Nothing amazing -- about half what the investment banks will pay, but more than a 'student job' (in a shop etc).

    2. Re:Dumb Question by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Intern salaries are almost the same as new grad salaries. CS is not like law and politics where mommy and daddy have to bribe to get you the internship and then you get screwed. In CS you get screwed(in just a different way) but you do get paid

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  36. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about MS or Google, but I did an internship at Yahoo!, and my salary was excellent. In fact, it was considerably higher than anything I was expecting (and well above market average).

  37. Guy not alone by bobbonomo · · Score: 1

    He's not alone. You would be amazed at how many people do that or the equivalent even when they know the whole domain name. Like typing www.thisdomain.ca into the search engine instead of on the address line. Even after you try to explain it.

    Some people even ask if I have Google on my machine.

    Read somewhere that one of the big search queries on Yahoo! was google. And vice-versa. Guess ditto for MSN.

  38. Re:A Yahoo! employee explains the single 24" monit by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

    And at MSFT, everyone in my team has a laptop (either a Tecra or VAIO, Core (2) Duo, 2GB), and similar desktop, dual 19" LCDs.

  39. AMD by ghoul · · Score: 1

    Seriously hiding your badges? I regularly walk out of AMD with 16000 dollar servers. Hint: Use the side door. (BTW people I am not stealing :). My lab and my office just happen to be in different buildings).
    But if you want a really really cool software job you should come work at a hardware company. Thats where the men get separated from the boys. To be able to send of emails to Linus saying please change this piece of code on the next kernel because it will work better this way due to the new features our hardware boys have dreamt up is kind of priceless)

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  40. Europe 1984 by ghoul · · Score: 1

    It could be more due to the fact that they couldnt get away with such human right violations in Europe. Its only in America that the law says once you are inside a corporate building normal laws regarding search and surveillance without warrants dont apply.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  41. Re:A Yahoo! employee explains the single 24" monit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sigh... I guess this is a Google/Yahoo pissing contest. Yes, Yahoo engineers can have a laptop and desktop if they want, too.

  42. Re:Europe 1984 by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

    The guards are outside the buildings, not in them.

  43. bet your resolution is lower ... by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    ...on the TV compared to the monitor.

    1. Re:bet your resolution is lower ... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >...on the TV compared to the monitor.

      1440x900, works for me.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.