Slashdot Mirror


Asteroid Highlighted as Impact Threat

Maggie McKee writes "The asteroid Apophis has been traversing the void of space for untold years; in just a few decades time it will make a very close pass to Earth, and could make an unwelcome stop on our planet's surface. Even still, it's nothing to get too worked up about. The 20-million-tonne object has a 1 in 45,000 chance of hitting the Pacific Ocean in early April of 2036. If it did hit, it could trigger a tsunami that would do an untold amount of damage to the California coastline and many other places on Earth. Despite the low level of the threat, it's still a real enough danger to prompt the United Nations to develop a protocol about the scenario. We'll get a closeup look at the object in 2029, and at that point we should have a better idea of what 2036 will bring us."

13 of 297 comments (clear)

  1. Call Bruce Willis by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

    We have some drilling to do!

    1. Re:Call Bruce Willis by sconeu · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it's Apophis, so we call Jack O'Neill. Those darned Goa'uld!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Call Bruce Willis by jfclavette · · Score: 5, Funny

      Talk about missing the point. In a few decades Bruce Willis might be DEAD ! Where does that leave us ?

  2. great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If we determined in 2029 that it was going to hit in 2036, our governments probably wouldn't be able to get their shit together quickly enough to do anything.

    1. Re:great by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

      Look at the bright side: we won't need to fix the Unix date overflow ;-)

  3. No Worries by blantonl · · Score: 5, Funny

    untold amount of damage to the California coastline

    Cancel that request... nothing to be worried about... nothing to see here. Move along folks..

    --
    Lindsay Blanton
    RadioReference.com
  4. Re:1 in 45,000 chance by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

    My wife plays the lottery, my bets are on total annihilation before she wins....

  5. Thanks by mustafap · · Score: 5, Funny

    >We'll get a closeup look at the object in 2029, and at that point we should have a better idea of what 2036 will bring us."

    I'll stick a reminder in outlook.

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
  6. The new protocol point by point.. by plasmacutter · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. set up an alert system:
      >>(green, no asteroid)
      >>(yellow, the asteroid MIGHT be near the earth)
      >>(orange, be careful when answering your door, IT MIGHT BE THE ASTEROID!)
      >>(red, we're already dead from the impact)

    2. earmark government funds to buy swimsuits and surfboards for all californians

    3. have congressional prayer sessions thanking the intelligent designer for wiping out the seat of all vice

    4. only give recovery funds to predominently white areas.

    5. Invade iraq in retaliation.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  7. Ah, Wikipedia's dry humor. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Funny
    By far the best part of that article:

    Using a (signed) 64-bit value introduces a new wraparound date in about 290 billion years, on Sunday, December 4, 292,277,026,596. However, this problem is not widely regarded as a pressing issue.
    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  8. Re:Strange write-up by skewer · · Score: 5, Funny

    How can you know where it would hit (Pacific Ocean) but not the exact date (only "early April of 2036")? It seems that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle applies to astronomy too.
  9. 2007 CA19 by crontabminusell · · Score: 5, Informative

    The object 2007 CA19 has a better chance (as of right now) of hitting the Earth than 99942 Apophis (2004 MN4) does. The former is also about four times larger than the latter and would have more than double the velocity at impact if it were to hit.

  10. Re:The Pacific by purfledspruce · · Score: 5, Informative
    Actually, the uncertainty mostly isn't due to error in position; it's due to the fact that, when we observe a NEO, it's a point of light in the sky. We really don't know how far away it is. If it's near to the Earth and Sun, it moves more quickly; if it's farther away, it moves more slowly. If you remember that things move in circles or ellipses around the Sun, then you might get the idea that the uncertainty "ellipse" (due to a small error in position left-right, but a very large error in depth) due to the different orbital velocities, it "stretches out" over time, wrapping the ellipse's major axis around the Sun until it's basically a straight line.

    There's a fantastic animation of this process at Spaceguard's site, just scroll down to the second animation.