Is "Making Available" Copyright Infringement?
NewYorkCountryLawyer updates us now that the legal issue — is it copyright infringement merely to "make available" a copyrighted work? — has been argued by the attorneys in Elektra v. Barker (on January 26). Whichever way the ruling goes it will have a large impact across the Internet. Appeal seems likely either way. No ruling has issued yet but "a friend" has made the 58-page transcript "available" (PDF here).
NewYorkCountryLawyer updates us now that the legal issue -- is it copyright infringement merely to "make available" a copyrighted work?
This of course, leading to 2011's legal dilemma: Is it copyright infringement to "view" a copyrighted work?
The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
re: would the house owner be liable for copyright infringement?
;)
Only if he runs off with the original and leaves you with a copy
Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration