MP3's Loss, Open Source's Gain
nadamsieee refers us to a piece up at Wired on the fallout from Microsoft's recent courtroom loss to Alcatel-Lucent over MP3 patents. From the article: "Alcatel-Lucent isn't the only winner in a federal jury's $1.52 billion patent infringement award against Microsoft this week. Other beneficiaries are the many rivals to the MP3 audio-compression format... Now, with a cloud over the de facto industry standard, companies that rely on MP3 may finally have sufficient motivation to move on. And that raises some tantalizing possibilities, including a real long shot: Open-source, royalty-free formats win."
Yeah! And what kind of name is Ogg Vorbis anyway!? ..
Stupid stupid name!
256kHz and 512kHz? I can't hear much above 20kHz, nor do I think my computer can produce that sound in the 16bit-44kHz audio formats, given Nyquist limits.
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
you cant kill the mp3
...
the mp3 will live on
ipod tried to kill the mp3
but they failed as they were SMITE to the ground
metallica tried to kill the mp3
but they failed as they were STRICKEN down to the ground
RIAA tried to kill the mp3
ha! ha! ha! ha!
they FAILED as they were thrown to the ground!!
aaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! yeaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
aaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! yeaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
ledi aw ledi aw ledi aw ledidii awwwawww
No one can destroy the mp3
the mp3 will strike you down with a vicious blow
we are the vanquished foes of the mp3
we tried to win for why we do not know
That's what you think! They could be infringing on stuff that hasn't been patented yet. Then they'll be screwed.
"There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
I prefer to keep a portable turntable in my pants. The vinyl tends to skip when I fart, but I can really hear the difference between crappy digital and the analog. The vinyl record sounds better too.
-- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
Years from now when you can buy multiple terrabyte portable mp3 players, someone will still choose to store 10 million ogg/mp3 files instead of 1 million FLAC files. All legal files of course.
I'm sure the math of off but you get the point.
So I should buy better hardware so I can hear the noise in my MP3s?
Although I'm essentially a moderate person, I do believe that some sociopathic behavior does merit capital punishment for the pain and suffering that it can inflict on the innocent. The act of casually converting one lossy audio format to another passes my personal litmus test in that regard.
WMA at 64kbps sounds almost exactly like MP3@128kpbs
You have my sympathy. How did you lose your hearing?
I want my... I want my Mp3...
I want my... I want my Mp3...
Now look at them Lucents
That's the way you do it
You play your music on your Mp3
That ain't workin'!
That's the way you do it
Get your money for patents
and your suits for free
Now that ain't workin'
That's the way you do it
Lemme tell you these guys ain't dumb
Maybe get a lawsuit for your little codec
Maybe get a lawsuit for your Zune
We gotta install class action lawyers
Custom codec circuitery
We gotta move these patent infringements
We gotta move these Alcatel bills
[...]
My 0.02 cents
It's a better name than GIMP.
Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
I have a patent pending algorithm that allows reproduction above the Nyquist limit by using a reverse-aliasing predictor transform.
It can represent up to the sampling rate, instead of half the sample rate.
Using complex elements in the transformation matrix one can get 2X, but that causes many terms in the transform to not cancel out until the end, and thus uses too much RAM (O(N^2)) for embedded applications. I've even got it up to 8X the sample rate using quaternions, but the exponentially increased complexity makes it impractical even for the desktop (slower than real-time on a 3 GHz PC).
Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!