Slashdot Mirror


Intel to Sample Flash-killer PRAM This Year

Station writes "Intel's new phase-change memory technology (PRAM) will begin sampling this year. Samsung, IBM, and Hitachi are all working on phase-change memory as a successor to flash as it has a lower (~20ns) read latency than flash (50-90ns). 'Intel says they plan to ship the first PRAM modules as a straight-ahead NOR flash replacement so that they can work the kinks out of the design before trying to move it up the memory hierarchy. The company claims a much higher number of read-write cycles (100 million) than flash, as well as a potential 10 years' worth of data retention. NOR flash is typically used as program storage memory for mobile devices like cell phones, while more durable but slower NAND flash is used for mass storage in devices like the iPod nano.'"

78 comments

  1. Killer Pram? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Killer Pram? Won't somebody think of the children!!

    1. Re:Killer Pram? by JamesTRexx · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, it's going to be fun to go to the store here in the Netherlands and ask for a couple of "prammen". (slang for hooters :-) )

      --
      home
    2. Re:Killer Pram? by varghan · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly! Isn't it nice how tech-talk can sometimes sound plain dirty to people who don't know _what_ you're talking about. ;)

    3. Re:Killer Pram? by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Oh great, yet another "iPod killer."

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Killer Pram? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just tech talk. My Thai wife still doesn't understand why Honda renamed their "city car" Jazz to Fit for the European and US market. She likes the name Jazz much better!

    5. Re:Killer Pram? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Sweden, Honda tried to introduce a car called Honda Fitta. Interestingly, "fitta" means pussy in Swedish. And not just in some far-fetched sense. It is THE word.

      H&M, a SWEDISH company, last year introduced whole line of jeans called Sliq Fit. "Slicka" in swedish means "to lick" and "Sliq" sounds a lot like it. Apparently, nobody had thought of it(!?). This was quite funny since their really embarrassed behaviour indicated that it wasn't a PR-stunt.

      Strangely, no religious group made any comments except to make fun of the incidents.
      Which probably is because it's not the U.S.

    6. Re:Killer Pram? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      What are "Hooters"? Aren't they "owls" ??? I don't get what's so funny.

      I jest!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    7. Re:Killer Pram? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Killer Pram? Won't somebody think of the children!! Flash-killer Pram at that...
      I'm visualising the 6-month-old son of Ming the Merciless trying to run over Flash Gordon in a pram.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  2. more acronym confusion...(at least for mac users) by plasmacutter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    one of the later steps in fixing technical glitches in mac systems is to zap the pram..

    imagine the confusion between 2 friends when one says "i zapped my pram" .. one fixes your computer, the other breaks your flash device..

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  3. PRAM? Parameter RAM? by vilms · · Score: 0

    Geez, twenty-five years of Parameter RAM and the name gets to mean something else like *snaps fingers* that. There oughta be a law.
    It's like when "frontside" became "backside" </old_skater_grumble>

  4. If you think that's confusing... by CarpetShark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the UK, "pram" means a baby stroller.

    1. Re:If you think that's confusing... by vivaoporto · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. pram is a type of ship too. Won't someone think of the pirates??!

    2. Re:If you think that's confusing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pram was also the name of a great UK band from the 90s. The best description I ever heard of them went something along the lines of: Imagine the band on the Titanic playing as the ship sank. Pram is the ghosts of the band continuing to play at the bottom of the sea.

    3. Re:If you think that's confusing... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Well, of course. You use PRAM when you want to baby your system.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:If you think that's confusing... by RogueSeven · · Score: 1

      AM = Parallel Ra
      t's confusing you'll
      >if you think tha
      really get a kick that PR
      ndom Access Machine

  5. That's if you side with Intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Fortunately the rest of the industry is calling it PCM for Pulse-code modulation^w^wPhase-change memory.

  6. How does this compare to NOR flash in other ways? by jonwil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will it be cheaper per megabyte than current NOR flash?
    Will it mean that devices like mobile phones (or devices like the Lego Mindstorms which also stores programs/data on NOR flash) can have more memory space in them?

  7. 3D stacking by Kim0 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I really wish they would stack it in 3D to get humonguous memories, f.ex. like this:
    http://memory.oyhus.no/

    1. Re:3D stacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Sounds like it can be assembled by cheap labour.
      Yes, and the memory films can be made sloppily as well, "

      Yes now you too can make your super dense memory by chisel and screwdriver.

    2. Re:3D stacking by proxy318 · · Score: 2, Funny

      3D stacking is so yesterday. I want RAM that's stacked in 4D, so I can get tomorrow's lottery numbers today.

      --
      Saying your "phone ran out of batteries" is like saying your "car ran out of gas tanks".
  8. Unless they make PRAM out of PRAM by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    one of the later steps in fixing technical glitches in mac systems is to zap the pram.. PRAM being "parameter RAM", the nonvolatile memory used to store the Mac equivalent of BIOS settings. To "zap" it means to change all settings back to factory settings by holding Command+Option+P+R while turning on the power.

    imagine the confusion between 2 friends when one says "i zapped my pram" .. one fixes your computer, the other breaks your flash device.. Unless Apple starts using PRAM for the PRAM, which could happen.
    1. Re:Unless they make PRAM out of PRAM by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      holding Command+Option+P+R while turning on the power.
      Is that four keys? As well as turning on the power? Do Mac users needing to wipe their BIOS have to grow an extra arm?
    2. Re:Unless they make PRAM out of PRAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Do Mac users needing to wipe their BIOS have to grow an extra arm?

      Not really, just use 3 fingers on the left hand and 2 on the right.

    3. Re:Unless they make PRAM out of PRAM by ozamosi · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Mac people are all übersocial brats, and as such, they have friends. When reseting their "bios", they just invite five friends: four to hold down one key each, the fifth to press the power button, and the owner of the machine is then free to watch the monitor.

    4. Re:Unless they make PRAM out of PRAM by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Alternately you can just use one hand and do the metal "devil horns" sign (thumb on cmd-opt, index on R, pinky on P).

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    5. Re:Unless they make PRAM out of PRAM by thegnu · · Score: 1

      Alternately you can just use one hand and do the metal "devil horns" sign (thumb on cmd-opt, index on R, pinky on P).

      Don't let any evangelicals latch on to that one, or Apple's doomed. I always knew Mac users were a little odd...

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    6. Re:Unless they make PRAM out of PRAM by kinabrew · · Score: 1

      Is that four keys? As well as turning on the power? Do Mac users needing to wipe their BIOS have to grow an extra arm?
      No, but they would need to have a BIOS to wipe.
  9. X-Killer by cabinetsoft · · Score: 0

    I kind of got tired of these product-or-technology killer... most of them aren't killer at all and those that manage to get a decent marketshare or acceptance over the "killed" one do it just because the old one gets old... kind of same way smoking kills - it might or you just might die anyway.

    1. Re:X-Killer by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Well, at least Intel didn't "UNLEASH flash-killer!". God, I hate it when all the time someone "unleashes" something. Next marketdroid who uses that word will see me unleashing a load of urine in his eye.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    2. Re:X-Killer by PornMaster · · Score: 1

      You keep your wang on a leash?

    3. Re:X-Killer by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      No, I keep my urine on a leash. A huge difference.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    4. Re:X-Killer by creationer · · Score: 1

      Kind of like Jack Bauer wasn't born, he was unleashed?

    5. Re:X-Killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is hilarious....unleashing urine in someone's eye....

      "Promote this man Johnson!"

  10. Interesting.. but the page doesnt talk about... by plasmacutter · · Score: 2, Informative

    speed or latency.. (and what about heat exchange issues?)

    even with considerably slow throughput though.. it might be have useful applications in storage media..

    i'd love to replace a set of hot spinning platters with a tiny cartridge about the size of a gamecube memory card.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:Interesting.. but the page doesnt talk about... by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1
      From TFA:

      I haven't been able to find any access time numbers for Intel's PRAM technology, but competing technology from Hitachi boasts a 20ns read latency. This is much better than the 50ns to 90ns read latency typical of flash memory, but it's not even close to DDR2's ~3ns latency. If Intel's PRAM is in the same ballpark as Samsung's technology, then it won't be used as the main memory on your computer anytime soon.

      Now, I'm not up on my memory archtecture, but I think that flash is not currently optimized for a high throughput, because if people need that kind of speed, they just dump the contents into SRAM. DRAM has been optimized for latency and throughput because of where it's used. Is it possible that that the throughput could be sped up using similar tricks as those used in DRAM, even if the latency can't be improved? How important is latency versus throughput?

      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    2. Re:Interesting.. but the page doesnt talk about... by Kim0 · · Score: 1

      >... speed or latency.. (and what about heat exchange issues?)

      Very high speed is possible, since the surface of the chip has an awful number of wires for data to pass in parallell. It should be very fast, almost no matter how slow each memory cell is.

      Latency cannot be higher than the speed of each single memory cell, just as in flash memories. I guess there must be some kind of block transfer mode.

      As for heat, I guess that depends on the memory material. But for extreme cases, there could be cooling fluid flowing between the memory layers.

    3. Re:Interesting.. but the page doesnt talk about... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, Vista has a system that allows you to use a flash drive as a fast paging device for small files. It sounds like something like this might be similarly useful; good for small stuff that needs fast access, while you use a hard drive to store your bigger files where access time is less of an issue.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    4. Re:Interesting.. but the page doesnt talk about... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      heat exchange is how the entire design works, by applying heat to change the structure from crystalline to amorphous and back to read as 1's and 0's. Heat is a necessary factor in this, sadly. But, it is still non-volatile, and it's the same material used in re-writable optical discs, it's not as fast as a hard drive but there's no chance of mechanical failure. This technology looks very promising, and if it comes thru, it'll kick Flash's ass to hell and back.

      http://www.ovonyx.com/tech_html.html Link to the tech paper Oxonyx has concerning the technology and their take on the future uses.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  11. Re:more acronym confusion...(at least for mac user by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    Isn't that one of the Mac repair myths? Repairing permissions and PRAM resetting are two things that are often recommended even though it usually doesn't fix anything. I haven't heard of anything that was fixed by doing either.

  12. Obligatory Monty Python Reference... by jimstapleton · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do they like to push it a lot?

    --
    34486853790
    Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    1. Re:Obligatory Monty Python Reference... by jcr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's not go there... It's a silly place.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Obligatory Monty Python Reference... by brouski · · Score: 1

      Fuck, beaten.

      As usual.

      --
      Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
  13. Re:more acronym confusion...(at least for mac user by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative
    The PRAM used to be used to store a lot more in the pre-OS X days. Resetting it used to actually fix a few things caused by badly behaved system extensions. These days, it's a lot like clearing the CMOS contents on a PC; unlikely to change anything unless you have been messing with firmware settings.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  14. Re:more acronym confusion...(at least for mac user by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    well.. i had it recently fix a fan that wouldn't shut up even after a reboot (it got stuck on max after roughly 3 months of uptime)...

    (of course it could also have been the PMU reset i did while i was at it)

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  15. A day late and a dollar short by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

    Flash is now fairly cheap, it's in widespread use and it's a known quantity. Good luck trying to replace it.

    1. Re:A day late and a dollar short by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If their designs are pin compatible, good luck not not replacing it.

      Let's see faster, more durable, *and* drop in compatible? Short of insane license requirements I can't see it being a no sale.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:A day late and a dollar short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If the erase cycle figure is correct and price is similar to NOR flash, I, and other embedded designers would switch in a heartbeat.

    3. Re:A day late and a dollar short by squizzar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So were 5.25", 3.5" floppies, zip disks, cd-rw, dvd-rw etc. If the cost is right and the benefits are great enough it will be adopted. If they package it in similar formats to that flash currently uses (eg. usb sticks, sd cards) for portable storage, and stick a SATA interface on it for internal (or even bulk external) storage, it will be adopted without most people noticing it's something new.

    4. Re:A day late and a dollar short by batje14 · · Score: 0

      That was once true for the hoolahoop, too. Seen those lately?

    5. Re:A day late and a dollar short by vtcodger · · Score: 1
      ***Flash is now fairly cheap, it's in widespread use and it's a known quantity. Good luck trying to replace it.***

      According to the article, this PRAM stuff can be configured to be flash compatible. IF it works out -- big IF, most of these wonders don't -- it might turn out to be a faster, drop in, replacement for flash.. If so, and if it isn't significantly more expensive than flash,it wouldn't be suprising to see PRAM replace flash in new products over the period of a few years.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    6. Re:A day late and a dollar short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Intel and other manufacturers HAVE to replace it as it's becoming exceedingly more difficult to scale ETOX processes down, especially in producing a multi-level cell product, which is where Intel's NOR flash generates the majority of its revenue. At the 65-nm node, the floating gate holds only a few hundred electrons. Phase change memory will allow Intel to scale NOR flash to 45nm and below.

    7. Re:A day late and a dollar short by psydeshow · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Like the difference between NiCad and NiMH rechargeable batteries.

      These new-fangled ones sure do last longer! Very few people care why.

    8. Re:A day late and a dollar short by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Flash is now fairly cheap, it's in widespread use and it's a known quantity. Good luck trying to replace it.


      I remember not too long ago when floppy disks were fairly cheap, in widespread use, and a known quantity, too.

      Yet, they seem to have been largely replaced by (depending on the application) flash devices, network transfer, and optical disks.

      And replacing flash with PRAM will be a lot more transparent to users, so if its got performance advantages, it will replace flash much more easily.
    9. Re:A day late and a dollar short by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      NiMH don't last longer than NiCd.

      oh you meant per-cycle...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    10. Re:A day late and a dollar short by csalcedo · · Score: 1

      like 5 1/4" floppies

    11. Re:A day late and a dollar short by Khyber · · Score: 1

      http://www.ovonyx.com/tech_html.html Read up on the technology. Flash is limited by write/read cycles. This technology uses pre-existing fabrication techniques. It doesn't deviate much at all from the standard CMOS design. It's less power-hungry, still non-volatile, and can be used in ANY current flash-based device (as you can easily pin-out it to any particular flavor card's spec)

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  16. Only 10 years? by mastershake_phd · · Score: 1

    Only 10 years? Are these things going to have a rejuvenate button?

  17. Re:How does this compare to NOR flash in other way by asliarun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Generally speaking, cost will be similar to NOR flash, if volume manufacturing picks up, and especially if Intel, Samsung, and other biggies get into the act. The key questions to ask are reliability/life of data and speed (and power consumption, if it is drastically different). From Intel's claims, reliability (or longevity) of data looks amazing for PRAM, but speed is still an unanswered question... both read and write speeds.

    My other lay question is how Intel and others are managing this chalc* glass manufacturing in their usual silicon DRAM process. Is this glass fused/bonded to silicon or something?

  18. Re:more acronym confusion...(at least for mac user by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    Resetting the PMU often does fix things. I had a machine that was overheating after about an hour of use and then crashing. Resetting the PMU made it turn the fans on at the correct time and keep working.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  19. Bit of pram, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Customer: (goes to door, runs his finger down the list of adverts) Pram for sale. Any offers. I'd like a bit of pram please.

    Shopkeeper: Ah yes, sir. That's in good condition.

    Customer: Oh good, I like them in good condition, eh? Eh?

  20. Bad news for Atmel? by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1

    I hope this doesn't kill ATMEL, I really like their AVR microcontrollers. That would be sad.

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    1. Re:Bad news for Atmel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used AVRs in a few toy projects, and like them. So how the fuck will PRAM kill ATMEL? I'm going to assume that the emergence of PRAM will do no such thing until further notice.

  21. Re:more acronym confusion...(at least for mac user by thegnu · · Score: 1

    "rhetoric": a label used by the intellectually dishonest to dismiss valid points which they are incapable of countering.

    Now, I'm no poly-tician, but that there's rhetoric, ain't it?

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  22. Re:more acronym confusion...(at least for mac user by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

    one of the later steps in fixing technical glitches in mac systems is to zap the pram..

    imagine the confusion between 2 friends when one says "i zapped my pram" .. one fixes your computer, the other breaks your flash device.. How about the eMacs / Emacs confusion? I can't think of any other good ones off the top of my head.
    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  23. Summary??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NAND is faster and less reliable. NOR is slower and more reliable.

  24. Data retention? by springbox · · Score: 1

    The article mentions that the period for data retention is 10 years with PRAM, which seems to be about the same as what's claimed for writable discs (the ones with organic dye.) I was under the impression that flash memory could retain data for a longer period of time? How long can flash memory hold data until it mysteriously disappears?

  25. It depends on the environment by mbessey · · Score: 1

    It can be up to 20 years under ideal conditions. Flash that's been erased many times will have a shorter data retention time, as will Flash stored at higher temperatures. A Google search on Flash Data Retention will lead to many pages from various semiconductor companies discussing the performance of their particular parts. There's a nice easy-to-read table in this document:
    http://www.spansion.com/application_notes/EndureRe tentn_AN_A0.pdf

  26. Does that mean that if I'm an extreme gamer by ninjojitsu · · Score: 1

    [cue operatic voice]
    I get to push the pramalot...?

  27. Flash killer - about time by baomike · · Score: 2, Funny

    Never liked flash anyway
    what ? you say it's memory?
    OH, nevermind

  28. Killer what? by ThisIsNotMyHandel · · Score: 1

    First it is the jpeg killer and now it is FLASH killer. Any use of the term "killer" in a headline is a joke. Ok so Intel introduces PRAM, but at what price point? Flash is surly going to drop in price. For any *real-life* application - does it really matter? Probably not. So is a manufacture going to choose a lower priced Flash memory chip or a new and more expensive PRAM memory chip? It speed was the only concern everyone would be attaching serial attached SCSI hard drive to their computers. The gamers - the speed demons - cant even get serial attached SCSI in their high end pre-built machines(alien wear). As with everything it is cost per megabyte, performance per dollar, and Watts per hour. Flash will be around for a long time. PS3 was going to be the dominant player in the console market and what happened? Zune was the iPod killer, where does Microsoft rank in the MP3 player market? It is not like this is a new technology in a general sense (to the average consumer), to be announced as "killer" it must be a new technology that will instantly replace all existing technology in that particular nitch. DLP/LCD tabletop TVs were the "RPTV CRT killer". CRT based RPTVs vanished overnight.

  29. Re:How does this compare to NOR flash in other way by tknd · · Score: 1

    How about density; can I get more or less space with the same physical size?

    Obviously I'd like to see something with more capacity than flash.

  30. Agreed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, please help protect Young Sebastion!!!11one

  31. PRAM/PCM already commercially available by dag_in_va · · Score: 1

    A couple of points. 1) Phase Change memory chips are already commercially available from BAE. One of the advantages of PCM not mentioned in the Intel announcement is radiation tolerance. BAE has been selling PCM for space applications since last summer. Rumor is they cannot keep up with demand. See: http://www.baesystems.com/Newsroom/NewsReleases/20 06/autoGen_10703020214.html 2) All of the memory manufacturers are licensing the basic tech from Energy Conversion Devices. It all derives from Stan Ovshinsky's patent number 5,166,758 more than a decade ago. Check it out. Disclosure: I own some ECD stock. Dag

  32. Haha! About time! by Khyber · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting for this to finally come out, as noted in some of my other slashdot comments. Not onyl does this have better latency, but the write/read cycles are exponentially larger, in the trillions range, cmopared to maybe 250,000-500,000 of Flash. Perfect for making storage drives with, and it's small, uses mostly pre-existing fabrication techniques, and once production ramps up it'll be CHEAP!

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.