Slashdot Mirror


Is Gentoo in crisis?

TheCoop1984 writes "A recent article on distrowatch, and an extended thread on the gentoo forums, have pointed out that gentoo is not what it used to be. Daniel Robbins came back and went again after only a few days, developer turnover is as high as ever, personal attacks on the mailing lists are common, and people are generally not happy about the current state of affairs. Is gentoo rotting from the inside, and can anything be done about it?"

16 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. No way! by guysmilee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When people with strong personalities leave an organization it becomes more attractive for people that would rather not deal with them. I expect Gentoo will see a trickle in of new developers.

  2. Hope it doesn't pass away by squoozer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope gentoo doesn't pass away as it's a clever idea and a good system but really who was it appealing to? Even as a geek is wasn't really interested in compiling my own packages because there is so little to be gained by it. Probably the best solution is to have a system where you can compile your own easily when you want to but generally take the precompiled offering - basically what Debian does. The performance that Gentoo claimed never really appeared AFAIK and I think that would be the only reason for the system.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re:Hope it doesn't pass away by Billy+the+Impaler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well I've been hearing people say for years now that for most users computers are more than fast enough. Perhaps the extra few percent increase in performance of running specially optimized, self-compiled binaries is just not so visible these days when multiple GHz-speed machines with gigabytes of memory are everywhere.

    2. Re:Hope it doesn't pass away by darkwhite · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gentoo is very appealing to me and my lab because it offers unprecedented flexibility in how I want to build and configure my system, and reliable tools to keep it up-to-date and secure. Compiling from source is just one aspect of this flexibility - with just a couple simple steps I can modify the source code of any package and deploy it on my system, a much harder task on any other distro. Personally, I also consider it the epitome of the open source ideal.

      Back to the appeal question, our lab will soon be deploying Gentoo on a PXE booted HPC cluster with over 256 cores, and this is on the low end of the scale where Gentoo clusters come in (I know of people responsible for its deployment on 512+ node, 2K-core clusters). I won't even begin to list other places where Gentoo comes in as a first choice because of its flexibility.

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    3. Re:Hope it doesn't pass away by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is very true. The people who really need the speed, those running clusters and such, aren't using Gentoo. People who use up all their CPU cycles are probably the only ones who would benefit. Most of the people running gentoo just seem to be home users who think they're seeing a speed increase, but would probably get more work done if they didn't spend so much time compiling and tweaking.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Hope it doesn't pass away by matt74441 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm a home user using Gentoo on two of my computers and I'm not doing it because I'm trying to get as much speed as possible, I'm using it because I like to be able to customize everything. Theres something I like about being able to build a system (almost) from the ground up, as I know exactly what is there. Oh and I don't spend all of my time compiling and tweaking, to me that is one of the weakest arguments against using Gentoo. When I hear that argument from someone, I know that they have failed to understand the purpose of Gentoo. The ability to compile everything and tweak everything on your system IS NOT A WEAKNESS of Gentoo, but its greatest strength. I would rather spend a day compiling X and KDE on my system when I know that it has been built with everything that I need, rather than installing a package that has been compiled with every option and have unnecessary dependencies cluttering up my system. Maybe I'm just more patient than most people, who knows. As for the article, Gentoo is not in crisis, one relatively unimportant developer is not going to take the entire project down. I wish him luck in whatever he moves onto, I just hope he tells the other developers that hes a freaking drama queen and they should censor all criticism from him.

    5. Re:Hope it doesn't pass away by cyclop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are right, but Gentoo makes it easy. It has the best package management system ever done -even better than apt-get IMHO and surely at least on par with it.

      Having the easiness of a great package manager with included ability to fine tune your packages is the strength of Gentoo.

      --
      -- Patent no.123456: A way to personalize /. comments with a sig attached to the end.
    6. Re:Hope it doesn't pass away by corychristison · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Simply download the source and compile it. Sure Gentoo does this for everything, but we don't really need this for everything. For the packages that do require it, go ahead and compile, you can do this on any Linux system.
      Although I understand what you are thinking here, a lot of the time it's not practical... Mostly because of the way that the package manager handles dependencies. For example, do not install X.org from your repository. Install it from source, then try to install a program [say, via RPM] that depends on it's libraries.

      The program will hiccup and complain that X is not installed... but really it is. If there was an option to 'emulate' a package, I think that would be a terrific system. However, some distro's like to put things in different places, and you would have to explicitly compile a package to conform to where your distro likes to put things. EG: In Gentoo the portmap config is in /etc/conf.d/portmap, in Ubuntu it is /etc/default/portmap [I think?]
  3. Re:A More Pertinent Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That's why most people use gentoo. It looks good, ostensibly. People never stop to consider the long-term. Consider this: A timeline of 365 days of gentoo.

    Days 1-3, install.
    Day */3 - Recompile $pkg for security vulnerability or new version. Re-edit this pkg's config file because options have changed. Some renamed, some deprecated, some added, some removed. Re-attempt to get your server back into the state it was two weeks ago without having to revert to a vulnerable package.
    Day 365 - suicide.

    Now, compare this to debian:

    Minutes 1-10, install.
    Days */10, apt-get upgrade (assuming a cron of apt-get update).
    Day 365? At the beach, not even thinking about your servers.

    Repeat after me: Gentoo is not a server OS.

  4. Running Gentoo since 2002... by quag7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, I've read several articles online in the last few months which suggest serious problems with Gentoo. But I think it's important to consider the fact that, from my personal perspective and in my own experience, I have had less issues in the last 6 months with Gentoo (except for a hardware failure on one of my main hard drive), than I have had in all the time I've used Gentoo. My system right now is also running more unstable packages than I've ever run, and this is all in amd64.

    I admit that I'd stick with Gentoo even if, from my perspective as a user, it was going through a hard time, but on my (KDE desktop) system, which is the main system I use for just about everything, if I didn't read these articles, I would have no idea that anything was going wrong.

    I have spent less time maintaining, fixing, or otherwise bringing my system up to date in the last few months than I have in years.

    As for interpersonal politics, lack of diplomacy, and immoderate language, I don't think that's anything unique to Gentoo. It may well be that there are some cultural issues which need addressing - not for me to say - and perhaps the departure of key developers may, in the future, affect the user's experience, but for me, this has not yet been the case.

    I like Gentoo a lot - in fact, I wound up running it sort of by mistake. As a newcomer to Linux, I'd read (in late 2001) that the Gentoo install was some kind of baptism of fire. I had problems understanding some of the fundamentals of how Linux systems are set up and at the time my Mandrake install was not helping me learn. I installed Gentoo as a lark, with the idea that I might learn some things about Linux that I could apply to Mandrake (which I was running because everyone said, at the time, that it was a great distribution for beginners).

    Having gotten it installed on the first try, without any problems whatsoever, I ran it for a little while. Then I fell in love with portage which was - at the time - more reliable than Mandrake's package manager. After a few weeks, I couldn't find a reason to go back to Mandrake. This was just a few months in, after years of being a Windows user (which is why I also take issue with the popular assertion that Gentoo isn't for beginners, because it was ideal for me).

    In the time since, I've tried several distributions and use Debian on my router and my file server, because they're old, crotchety machines that I was too lazy to install Gentoo on. But I've yet to find anything which so closely matches my expectation of how my system should work, than Gentoo. Which is why I'd stick with it (that and 5 years of momentum, of course).

    For me, Gentoo is about ease of use, and specifically *not* having to spend a lot of time keeping my system up to date. In no way am I suggesting that the assertions of others that "Gentoo is too much work" are invalid, but they certainly have nothing to do with my experience, or that of many other Gentoo users. As for compiling software (for instance), this is a process I run, background, and forget about. Every few months, something a little more involved might require an hour or so of my attention (a major GCC upgrade, for instance) but overall, maintaining my system is simply not a time sink, at all.

    And no, I'm not a developer. A computer hobbyist and fan of computers, but hardly some kind of guru. There may be good reasons not to use Gentoo, but I'd hate for anyone to think that these political spats somehow define the distribution or have much to do with the user's experience.

    At least, it doesn't, so far, have anything to do with *me*. I still recommend Gentoo wholeheartedly. I have a lot of affection for it. I can and have used other distributions and I could learn to live with just about any distribution if I had to, but I doubt it would be the complete pleasure that Gentoo has been. I don't have hatred for any of the distributions I've tried out (Debian, OpenSuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, Slackware, Kubuntu, and FreeBSD as well), bu

  5. It's all about the packages... by friedmud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For me, as a Computer Scientist, it's all about the packages. I _love_ the bleeding edge and the obscure. No other distro out there offers the depth and breadth of packages that Gentoo does. Using anything else is just downright painful as I end up compiling a lot of my own programs _anyway_ by hand (and not managed).

    I originally switched to Gentoo because I had given up on using Slackware's package system and was keeping a large library of software current by hand.... Gentoo scratched my itch perfectly.

    I really do hope it doesn't die from the inside. There are still a lot of people doing a lot of good work... and a _lot_ of people still benefiting from it. The way I see it, these type of squabbles are just a by product of becoming popular. As your dev team grows you're inevitably going to have personality conflicts... you just hope that over time you find a way to work them out and it doesn't bring the project down in the mean time.

    Friedmud

  6. Re:A More Pertinent Question by Knuckles · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You do unattended package upgrades without testing on a server? Do you also want to be on the beach on day 365, unemployed?

    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  7. Post vs Comments by Sascha+J. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Quite funny that almost everytime when "Gentoo" is the topic, all the talks and comments evolve around (pseudo-)speed, source-distribution and things like that.

    The article is about internal problems, and not about how one's computer runs absolutely flawlessly, or not.

  8. Re:What's the big idea? by wellingj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think Gentoo should focus on it's embedded offering. The benifits of being
    able to compile all your packages from source and combine your system however you
    want and do it all from source really shines.

  9. Good & bad by FonkiE · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well I think gentoo got better over the years. Maybe the developers have to reorder and have some manifest they stick too when arguments/problems come up.

    What got better:
    - modular X
    - good integration of gentoo kernel and driver packages
    - /etc/portage settings
    - cleaned up USE flags

    What got worse:
    - dropping of packages for just political reasons e.g. xmms and the lie that's technical
    - complexity
    - useless dependencies (like not being able to install postfix and ssmtp at the same time)

    Can be fixed - no panik.

  10. Re:Gentoo definitely is in crisis. by Tanuki64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I love to hear people complain that we're all egomaniacal when we decide not to maintain something...
    Please read my statement carefully. I wrote: seemingly egomaniacal decisions. Yes, I know that this decision caused some bad blood in the Gentoo forum. And I do think complaining about this is unfair. However, even if I do understand, I don't have to like it. It just forces me to invest time in problems, which I already solved and have no interest in anymore. Sometimes again and again.

    Nobody stepped up to pick up the slack, yet a bunch of people started whining about it.
    Right, but what do you expect? For most people Gentoo or other Linux distributions are tools, which they use to solve their own problems. I for instance have two active projects on SourceForge. Do you expect me to abandon them to fix some Gentoo problems? Which problem exactly? Is xmms the only problematic package? So I volunteer to manage the xmms package. Then I find a bug in package foo, am I allowed to complain now? Or do I have to fix this too? What next? bar? Many other Gentoo users would not even have the skills to help you.

    Sorry, sometimes the complaints are definitely far over the top. Some a******s forget too easily that Gentoo and similar projects are mainly run by volunteers. However, complaining that many make demands, but only very few are willing to help, isn't correct and helpful either. The time where Linux had much more developers than mere users are long gone. Fortunately.