Slashdot Mirror


SCO Chair's Anti-Porn Act Advances In Utah

iptables -A FORWARD writes "Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. of Utah reportedly plans to sign a resolution urging Congress to enact the Internet Community Ports Act. The ICPA proposes that online content be divided by port, rather like TVs have channels with adult and family content, so that certain internet ports will be 'clean' — so-called Community Ports — and others will be 'dirty.' Thus, they hope to remove objectionable content from port 80 and require that it be moved elsewhere (port 666 was already taken by Doom, sorry), so that people could more easily block objectionable content, or have their ISPs do the blocking for them. This concept is being pushed by the CP80 group, which is chaired by Ralph Yarro, who also chairs the SCO Group. That probably explains why they didn't choose to adopt RFC 3514, instead."

11 of 421 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I believe I speak for all of us here ... by jimstapleton · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, Only SCO would think that the state government of Utah controls the world.

    Anybody else would laugh - how the hell do they think that they can make this work, when most of the people in that industry AREN'T IN UTAH!

    --
    34486853790
    Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
  2. Enforceable? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is about as enforceable as the .xxx TLD. No matter what you do, you're not going to be able segregate the pr0n from other content. Unless you're SCO, I guess, then maybe you could sue those who don't comply by claiming that your intellectual property is on port 80, therefore you own all of the content on port 80 -- millions of lines of HTML!

    1. Re:Enforceable? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Funny

      No matter what you do, you're not going to be able segregate the pr0n from other content.

      Pah! All you have to do is see if the 'porn' bit is set in the headers.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  3. Gah, get your definition straight! by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Funny

    "There is this assumption that you can't control it (the Internet)," Yarro said. "It's a toaster, we made it, we can fix it. ... We can solve the Internet pornography problem tomorrow if we decided to."

    Stupid legislators. It's not a fricking toaster, that's rediculous.

    It's a series of tubes.

    I thought we got that straight a few months ago!

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  4. So relieved to find out the internet is a toaster by heroofhyr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now all we need is to figure out a way to get Yarro to open Firefox in the bathtub.

    --
    brandelf: invalid ELF type 'KEEBLER'
  5. Re:I believe I speak for all of us here ... by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only SCO would think that the state government of Utah controls the world.

          Well Utah USED TO control the world, until IBM stole it!

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  6. Port Suggestions by jasenj1 · · Score: 4, Funny
    How about:

    80085
    (I know it's not valid. It's a joke, son. Laugh.)
  7. Re:I believe I speak for all of us here ... by SCPRedMage · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well Utah USED TO control the world, until IBM stole it! I'd prove it, but IBM destroyed the evidence, too.
    --
    My sig can beat up your sig.
  8. Re:Port 69 by antonyb · · Score: 4, Funny
    No, no, no. It stands for "Tube For The Porn". Its all about the Tubes, these days.


    While we're at it, TCP stands for "Tube Carrying Porn", and IP is "Internet Porn", which goes to prove that the internet is founded on porn.


    ant.

  9. Re:I believe I speak for all of us here ... by binarybum · · Score: 4, Funny

    yeah, but I kinda like Mormon porn.

    --
    ôó
  10. Re:shouldn't that read... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was going to make a hardcore double penetration input-in-the-output-port joke, but then I started thinking about how many networking geeks would jump all over the joke based on the fact that double penetrating the pron port would cause a tcp/ip collision, and therefore no penetration would occur, and I gave it up as a lost cause.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.