Slashdot Mirror


Videogame Decency Act in Congress

GamePolitics reports on yet another attempt by lawmakers to make the world safe from the dangers of electronic entertainment. Entered by Representative Fred Upton, the bill spells out penalties for game companies that try to 'sneak' something past ESRB raters. Says Upton, "I guess I thought the FTC would have had some more teeth than they apparently have... I'm not at all happy... In essence there are no consequences. None... I would like to have thought that (Take-Two and Rockstar) would have been able to be fined for millions of dollars for the trash they put out across this country. I am going to be looking to write legislation giving the FTC the authority to impose civil penalties."

9 of 73 comments (clear)

  1. censorship fixes everything by User+956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Entered by Representative Fred Upton, the bill spells out penalties for game companies that try to 'sneak' something past ESRB raters.

    What does that even mean? Hot Coffee wasn't a 'sneak', it was excised content that required a third-party modification to even view. Yeah it was on the disc, but it wasn't accessible. It's not like you hit a secret code and OMG PORN.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:censorship fixes everything by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's more, who's spelling out what "sneak" means? If players can manipulate the game in a way the developers did not really intend (upskirt views come to mind), does this count? What about fanedits? Does this clown even know the difference?

    2. Re:censorship fixes everything by SnowZero · · Score: 5, Funny

      While there may be some difficulties in the law, with harsh penalties predicated on ambiguous undefined concepts in the current phrasing, I feel you're losing sight of the big picture. We have to think of the children, and how we can best protect them in a world with so many dangers, many of which have been caused by violent music and video games (but not movies). So, while there may be some shortcomings in the current law, it is well worth the price. As Benjamin Franklin said, sometimes you have to give up some freedom temporarily in order to gain security. Also, several senators have gone on record promising that they would not abuse this additional power, so I think your fears of abuse are unfounded.

  2. We've seen this before. by Lightwarrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We've seen this before. It sucked - it set the comic book industry back nearly twenty years. *AND* it was self imposed. Let's learn from that mistake, shall we?

    --
    Mods: Disagreeing with me != my post Offtopic / Flamebait.
    World without hate or war, invaded. Tragic?
  3. Missed his target, apparently. by XenoRyet · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Everyone loves to tie the "Hot Coffee" scandal into these types of discussions, including the author of the bill apparently, but it looks like Rockstar would not be punished under this law.

    It shall be unlawful... to... distribute... any video game that contains a rating label... for that video game where the person, with the intent of obtaining a less restrictive age-based content rating, failed to disclose content of the video game that was required to be disclosed to the independent ratings organization...
    I think you'd have a pretty hard time proving that Rockstar intentionally hid the Hot Coffee content with the intent of obtaining a less restrictive rating. It makes you wonder how much legislators actually know about the things they try to legislate.
    --
    If forums teach us anything, it is that logic and critical thinking should be required courses in the public schools.
  4. How did this happen? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Distributing a video game without rating from the ESRB is completely lawful, just that some stores won't stock it. They are a private organization. Defrauding them is a contractual matter between 2 private enterprises. Mr Upton, STFU and GBTW.

  5. I agree with this law by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seriously, it's about time Congress did something that affected me, and what could be better than making sure we get some decent games? I'm sick of all the shite games on the shelves these days, which based solely on their packaging are indistinguishable from the good games sitting right next to them. They cost just as much, but are complete crap, blatant shovelware designed to sucker people into buying them. The makers of garbage like Turok: Evolution should be held accountable. Good for you Congress for supporting decent games.

    Uh, wait, I think I missed something...

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  6. keep it up. by pezpunk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    go ahead, continue to alienate a large and growing segment of the voting public. more and more every day, gaming is a passtime engaged in by adults of voting age. when a politician calls a perfectly good game "trash", he just looks like an out of touch relic. i mean, we all played GTA. it was good clean ludicrous fun (if a bit monotonous by the fifth iteration or so). by the way, i'm an avid gamer ... no, not an obnoxious pimply-faced 15 year old, as this politician probably assumes all gamers are, but a 30 year old married guy -- and i'm far from unusual. politicians going off like this remind me of strom thurmond types from the 50's railing against the black man's devil music, swearing that the evil jungle beats will corrupt the morality of our children.

    WE are the children whose parents swore to us mario would rot our brain and corrupt our souls. we will reject that notion as wholeheartedly as our parents rejected the same assertion back when it was aimed at the Beatles and the Stones.

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
  7. Coincidence by prockcore · · Score: 5, Funny

    What a coincidence. I was just drafting legislation that would fine Fred Upton for being a douchebag.