Slashdot Mirror


Surprise, Windows Listed as Most Secure OS

david_g17 writes "According to a Symantec study reported by Information Week, Microsoft has the most secure operating system amongst its commercial competitors. The report only covered the last 6 months of vulnerabilities and patch releases, but the results place Microsoft operating systems above Mac OS X and Red Hat. According to the article, 'The report found that Microsoft Windows had the fewest number of patches and the shortest average patch development time of the five operating systems it monitored in the last six months of 2006.' The article continues to mention the metrics used in the study (quantity and severity of vulnerabilities as well as the amount of time one must wait for the patch to be released)."

40 of 499 comments (clear)

  1. Simply by COMON$ · · Score: 5, Funny
    Let me simplify:

    This discussion will go as follows.

    Linux geeks will pound the boards about foul play and all the vulerabilities they would exploit if they werent to busy checking dependencies.

    Mac fanboys will make fun of both citing how Symantec didnt like them in the first place, because Mac people dont buy Symantec products.

    Windows geeks will state how this has always been the case, but because they are the more popular OS they are a bigger target.

    And finally the old unix guys will flame about how none of these vulnerabilites would have happened if we would have stayed away from GUIs.

    So now that we have got that out of the way we can bypass all the leg humping and mindless dribble and get down to the real discussion...can Microsoft keep it up? Personally as a network admin I have not been too nervous the last 6 months. Since the year of the blaster MS has done a pretty good job of making up for exploits and covering their asses. All is quiet on the homefront.

    --
    CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    1. Re:Simply by cyber-vandal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Spoilsport :P

    2. Re:Simply by slazzy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Simple - someone must have r00ted internetnews.com and their IIS

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    3. Re:Simply by Stanistani · · Score: 5, Funny

      >we can bypass all the leg humping and mindless dribble and get down to the real discussion...can Microsoft keep it up?

      So much sexual innuendo - so little time.

    4. Re:Simply by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Windows is the safest OS, it's just that it has to tolerate being on unsecure networks, usage by mouth-breathers, and its overwhelming attractiveness as a target for criminals.

      *please mod insightful, please mod insightful*

    5. Re:Simply by pogson · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have found Windows to be exceptionally secure after I install GNU/Linux right over top of it. I have never had a failure after this procedure. I started doing it when I saw machines running Windows fail for no apparent reason, sometimes just idling and "PFFT!", dead as a BSOD. People told me it was hardware problems, but, running on the same hardware, the new installation would run for months with no downtime.

      --
      A problem is an opportunity http://mrpogson.com
    6. Re:Simply by Rei · · Score: 4, Funny

      You BETTER keep them AWAY from your CAPS LOCK as well, ZIPPY!

      (I have no problem with the post -- only with Slashdot's title for it. I would recommend something more like "Windows Is Most Secure OS, Say Flying Pigs")

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    7. Re:Simply by eikonos · · Score: 5, Funny

      That will teach internetnews.com to host their site on a Windows box. :P

    8. Re:Simply by norminator · · Score: 5, Funny

      I must be bored... a handy reference card:

      "Mindless dribble" = "Mindless drivel", people. please. I see this so often and it grieveth me so.
      -and, from previous Slashdot discussions...
      "a mute point" = "a moot point"

      and my absolute favorite...
      "for all intensive purposes" (aaargh!) = "for all intents and purposes"

      ok? fixed? I can go back to work now?

      I could care less about those grammar errors...
    9. Re:Simply by AdonaiElohim · · Score: 2, Funny

      I could care less about those grammar errors...

      I like what you did there... unless it was unintentional of course.
       
      and retarded things like "for all intensive purposes" and misuse of "it's" are in pretty much every other comment I've been looking at lately. i'm not perfect myself, but when I see something like "windows looses it's credibility" to me it looks like animals have been flailing at the keyboard with their paws.

    10. Re:Simply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "favorite" = "favourite" :-P

    11. Re:Simply by earthbound+kid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Irregardless, the previous poster should of corrected it.

    12. Re:Simply by aug24 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's more fun annoying the spelling nazis than the grammer nazis.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  2. Ive seen the evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny


    its a blue screen that tells you
    IRQ_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL

    never been infected while ive seen that on my screen
    even in Vista !

  3. Sigh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I can picture that scene from Star Wars, where Obi Wan feels a disturbance in the force, except instead of thousands of voices being silenced, it's the sound of thousands of dyed-in-the-wool Linux geeks having an aneurysm.

    Just take a deep breath guys! If it's at all therapeutic, just remind everyon that Norton Antivirus sucks! :D

    - Scott

  4. Re:In other unrelated news today by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 4, Funny
    Microsoft has the most secure operating system amongst its commercial competitors.

    Surely you've jumped the gun. This is March 22. April 1st isn't for a few days.

  5. Of course it's more secure.. by GonzoTech · · Score: 4, Funny

    Steve Ballmer's chair throwing corps makes sure they get good reviews.. or else.

    --
    "Snatching defeat from the mouth of victory on a daily basis."
  6. GUIs? Hah! Like command lines are any better by spun · · Score: 4, Funny

    In MY day, we toggled programs into the front panel with SWITCHES, and we LIKED IT! Now get off my lawn, you damn kids.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:GUIs? Hah! Like command lines are any better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You had tape?

      I would have killed for tape.

      In my day we stored data on twigs and tree bark and we liked it.

      And don't get me started on "binary". It was either zero or it wasn't. We didn't need no stinking ones.

    2. Re:GUIs? Hah! Like command lines are any better by nsayer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Luxury.

      We had to draw our data in the sand. We hadn't heard about zeros, so we had to write them as I-I.

    3. Re:GUIs? Hah! Like command lines are any better by QuickFox · · Score: 2, Funny

      You had ones? Luxury. We had neither ones nor zeros, we had nothing. Nothing! In other words, we had holes. All we could use was holes. Do you have any idea how annoying holes are? Put one in your pocket, next thing you know everything in your pocket falls out through the hole.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    4. Re:GUIs? Hah! Like command lines are any better by Scoldog · · Score: 5, Funny

      In my day, I had to turn the light on for 1 and turn it off for 0.
       
      Problem is, the PHB saw me doing this and told me to leave the light on. I said this would be a bad idea as it would signal the lusers that the system was in production and that they could potentially stuff the system up, especially all the batch files running that where processing data relating to the "Earth" project. The PHB ignored me and created two new limited access user accounts (Hereby called Luser1 AKA Adam and Luser2 AKA Eve).
       
      Anyhoo, to cut a long story short, Luser2 managed to get the root password (due to a worm that the PHB infected the server with), shared it with Luser1 and managed to give themselves greater access to the info on the server. The PHB found out about this and got pretty mad with them. He deleted their user accounts, kicked them off the server and installed a firewall so that they could never again access the almighty server.
       
      So anyway, here I am, the 21C of the "Universe" server, still watching the spawn processes of those two lusers still multiplying and changing and dealing with new problems like cooling fans starting to die.
       
      I don't think I'll ever get this server right again.

      --
      This space for rent
    5. Re:GUIs? Hah! Like command lines are any better by couch_warrior · · Score: 2, Funny

      SWITCHES, you had SWITCHES???

      WE programmed the executable memory with JUMPERS, because it was read-only

      And if we would get rid of this amazingly insecure invention called RAM, and record the OS and application executables in PROM at the factory the way God intended, there wouldn't be any computer viruses EVER AGAIN!

      --
      "Sic Semper Path of Least Resistance"
    6. Re:GUIs? Hah! Like command lines are any better by warb · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yea,
      I still remember the day I came into the computer room finding my two compatriots at the end of two
      hours of single stepping thru our assembly code on the front panel. Traced the bug to my code. The
      look in there eyes still sends chills.

  7. Translation Follows: by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We don't sell any anti-virus or firewall software when people buy Linux."

    Chris Mattern

  8. You are being listed as the most secure OS. by FMota91 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cancel or Allow?

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C1 bottles of beer on the wall. Take one down, pass it round... Oh, umm...
    1. Re:You are being listed as the most secure OS. by Starburnt · · Score: 1, Funny

      You have selected Allow. Cancel or Allow?

  9. Re:small addition by mattgreen · · Score: 1, Funny

    I rather like watching people falling over themselves to defend a computer operating system as if what they were saying actually changes something. It is fun to watch people who are so disconnected from reality.

    Also, you have to love how a site billed as "news for nerds" has people adding absolutely worthless tags such as "no" to a story.

  10. Win95 the Most Secure OS by HtR · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow. Windows 95 must be the most secure OS ever.

    I haven't seen any patches for it in ages!

    --
    Have you tried turning it off and on again?
  11. THIS JUST IN! by pak9rabid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Symantec's net income mysteriously increased by $10 million....In other news, Microsoft's net income shows a decrease of $10 million. Upon investigation of Microsoft's income statement, "other expenses" showed an increase of $10 million...

  12. Street Cred by dr_strang · · Score: 3, Funny

    Symantec has all the street cred of a pimply-faced 17-year old driving his mom's Lexus SUV. Seriously.

    --
    This is a sig. It is like every other sig in the world, except that it is mine, and it is different.
  13. Re:small addition by Gilmoure · · Score: 4, Funny

    Death to all fanatics!

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  14. Even more spectacular is the conclusion by mangu · · Score: 4, Funny
    12 severe for windows and 2 severe for Linux is farking spectacular


    The strange thing here is that they say Windows has six times as many severe vulnerabilities and conclude "... therefore Windows is *more* secure than Linux ...". WTF? Have they changed the definition of "more"? Where can I get a patch for my English dictionary?

  15. How perfectly Orwellian by BlackSabbath · · Score: 5, Funny

    War is Peace
    Ignorance is Strength
    Windows is Secure

    and

    Windows is the most secure operating system. Windows has ALWAYS been the most secure operating system.

  16. Re:A more useful summary by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Funny

    9/10 dentists recommend using [insert toothpaste brand] over becoming a serial murderer.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  17. Windows is competely secure by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Funny

    All you have to do is max out the firewalls and not allow anything to be installed. If you are still having problems just disconnect it form the internet. Turning it off makes a Windows machine even more secure.

  18. Re:small addition by Eideewt · · Score: 2, Funny

    You make it sound like arguing isn't worth doing for its own sake.

  19. Re:small addition by carpeweb · · Score: 2, Funny

    Touche I thought that was spelled with a "d"; oh; never mind.
    ---
    Emily Latella
  20. Re:small addition by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Funny

    A lot of the security fixes seen in OS X are related to applications, things like "a maliciously crafted quicktime movie could lead to elevated privleges". This is a whole world different than "a buffer overflow in the TCP stack allows remote code execution".

    Most of the nasties windows copes with are things that will ambush you when you are doing what should be totally safe things, like browsing a web site or just plain being connected to the internet without a firewall. ...Or watching a QuickTime movie. Should be a totally safe thing, right?
    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  21. Re:Why? by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one welcome our bedtime attacking ghost overlords.