Samsung's UpStage Looks To Trump iPhone
bj sends word of Samsung's recently unveiled cell phone, called UpStage. It will ship April 1 (no fooling) for $300, or $150 with a 2-year contract from Sprint Nextel. "...the UpStage is a candy-bar style handset that's less than half an inch thick and not much taller or wider than an iPod Nano. Other multimedia-friendly cell phones struggle to balance the sometimes-conflicting requirements of a conventional handset and a music or video player; the UpStage solves this quandary by simply putting phone functions on one side of the device and the multimedia functions on the other side."
It doesn't matter if a phone has all nice features, a lot depends on the looks (both physical and OS).
A small phone with MP3 playback option won't win it of iPhone just because of the MP3 functionality.
Just my 2 cts.
Daxy's Networking Blog
You just know we are going to read about these in a couple of months failing because the screens are getting cracked and busted left and right.
Wouldn't a stylus approach, with a touch screen allow for arbitrary button placement? Wouldn't this solve this problem?
Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
$300 isnt too bad. Seems like phones have been getting too close to PS3 price territory.
Libertarian Leaning Political Discussion Forum.
"Samsung's UpStage Looks To Trump iPhone"
And fails.
Okay, I have no experience with the phone. I'm just saying that as with all recent Samsung phones, it almost certainly has two fatal weaknesses:
1) the typical Samsung phone interface (designed for the cheap and ignorant and their pet hamsters); and
2) the typical Samsung advanced feature-set (a.k.a. the self-destruct which activates immediately upon using it for anything other than voicemail).
It has a smaller screen, and what sounds like (to me) a more confusing UI that will really get fingerprints and palm prints on the device since you are always turning it over in your hands... And it has its own software for sync. Chances that is better than iTunes?
Also, as you get into pure touchscreen devices (which the media side of this is) then the in-phone UI is crucial, and Apple has shown they can do a good job with consumer UI in small devices.
Now what does sound like a kind of good idea, is the battery pouch where it recharges its smaller battery. That is an interesting ide to keep the device size down while keeping battery life good and shifting some weight to your hip where it an be borne easier.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Shouldn't they just call it uPhone? That way, when someone asks, "iPhone?", you can reply, "No. uPhone."
Um, how does this have anything to do with the iPhone? What is the point in comparing the two devices? For all I know this phone will turn out to be successful, but it is a completely different product.
iPhone - 4-8 GB of storage
Upstage - 64 MB (HA! yes Megabyte!)
iPhone - 3.5 inch screen at 320x480
Upstage - 2.1 inch screen at 176x220
iPhone - Ability to upload your own video content
Upstage - Access to Sprint TV video clips
Why are these being compared? They are not in the same product class or market.
It's impossible to compare the two. Out of the gate the screen size is nothing like the iPhone and the features and system don't compare. Smaller isn't always better. Remember the old calculators on pens? How many weeks did those last. It's another smart phone not an iPhone killer. Love it or hate it iPhone isn't like other phones on the market so they are tough to accurately compare. In another release or two the differences should get a lot more obvious.
The blurb in the ad says that it's upgradable to 2GB.
Sorry, but the new SD cards are 4GB. Devices that max out at 2GB don't even see that the card exists.
A coworker bought one to stuff in his smartphone. He should have read the fine print.
--
BMO
Ugly.
How can you compare something that looks like a cellphone and an mp3 player stuck together back to back with something as undeniably sleek and well-designed as the iPhone?
C'mon cell phone manufacturers, it's not that hard, hire some designers can actually design something that looks good and is functional - this is all that Apple does, it really is as simple as that; they've proven that people will pay extra for something that is beautiful and 'just works'
To paraphrase Ballmer: "Designers! Designers! Designers!"
Ironic? You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means...
I'm in Korea right now, and the technology that they put into phones is amazing. They've had DMB http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Multimedia_Br oadcasting in their phones for about a year now... The cameras in their phones go up to 5 megapixels, broadband internet (WiBro)... they have tons of phones that trump the iPhone... hands down, but not in the US market.
When Samsung exports phones to the US, we're getting phones that Korea had 2-3 years ago...
WOW
A Beowulf cluster of these things couldn't upstage the iPhone.
WiFi and Skype. If it can't do that, I won't buy it. I'm only interested in calling cheap. That what a phone is for. Skype is the cheapest way I know to call people, provided they also have a Skype account.
-- Cheers!