Slashdot Mirror


The DV Rebel's Guide

Michael Flynn writes "The DV Rebel's Guide is broken down into chapters that follow the basic timeline of a film's production. The first chapter covering the overall philosophy of the authors approach and the rest focused on the making of your film: Pre-production, Production and Post production. A great deal of the book is focused, to very good effect, on post production." Read on for the rest of Michael's review The DV Rebel's Guide author Stu Maschwitz pages 320 publisher Peachpit Press rating 9 reviewer Michael Flynn ISBN 0321413644 summary A` step by step guide to making your own film Stu Maschwitz is one of the founders of The Orphanage. A visual effects house with credits in such films as Sin City, The Day After Tomorrow, and Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. Prior to founding The Orphanage, Stu had a stint at ILM.

Stu's writing style is very easygoing and at times irreverent. Regarding his short film that he includes on the DVD, he points out "The Last Birthday Card was made on an Apple G3 and took over two days to render. I chose to take these enforced breaks from working on my film as opportunities to strike up a new hobby, one that I still practice today: staring at my After Effects progress bar".

In each chapter, a number of Hollywood action films is referenced. At the end of each chapter, the films that are mentioned are listed so that the reader can put them onto their NetFlix list or run over to the local video store and rent them to see first hand, the techniques that are referenced.

His pragmatic approach to getting the job done and using whatever tools are at hand or that you can build is highly effective. My only complaint is that there are a number of specifics regarding After Effects that are not covered in Stu's book. To his defense, this is not an After Effects tutorial. You are expected to know how to use AE before your dive into Stu's methods.

His suggestions for examining the area around you to utilize as much of what you have at hand is unique and effective. Suggesting the use of glass elevators for simulating crane master shots as well as people movers in airports for dolly shots is exemplary of the approach. Additionally, for the wood working inclined filmmaker, a very nice design is included for building a hand-holding rig for your DV camera (Stu eschews hand holding a DV camera due to the light weight that generally translates to a very shaky image).

The book details adding effects that Stu used in his short film "The Last Birthday Card". The film illustrates a number of useful techniques such as compositing a helicopter into a scene, practical bullet hits and squib simulations. He also includes high quality squib footage on the DVD for the rebel filmmaker to use in his/her own projects.

The last section of the book covers color correction in great detail. It provides techniques for using the color correction tools in After Effects as well as using a layered approach to this process. To illustrate the approaches that he suggests, he provides a number of After Effects projects on the DVD that the reader can use to follow along with the examples.

Stu also, wisely, includes one of the chapters of the book on the DVD in PDF format. This is the camera chapter. With DV cameras changing at such a rapid pace, this allowed him to provide very up to date information on DV cameras that might have been obsolete by the time the book had come back from the printer.

He provides a number of very nice scripts and presets on the DVD for a variety of effects as well as tools for color correcting. The film strip script that allows you to compare a number of shots at once for color/look management is particularly nice.

Finally,Stu maintains a lively message board devoted to the book where folks can ask questions and Stu is very prompt about providing answers. Having read over 200 books on film making, this book is the only one that will end up on the set of my next film.

You can purchase The DV Rebel's Guide: An All-Digital Approach to Making Killer Action Movies on the Cheap from amazon.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

51 comments

  1. Talent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Were's the chapter on "talent"?

    1. Re:Talent? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That hasn't been used in movies since the 50s.

    2. Re:Talent? by superwiz · · Score: 1

      It's covered in the chapter "arrogance".

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    3. Re:Talent? by iSeal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Were's the chapter on "talent"?
      There's talk about directing actors in general (with the author recommending "Directing Actors" by Judith Weston), but face it - if you're a DV Rebel (low-budget-indy-filmmaker), you don't really have the funds whereby a chapter on this would be relevant. Your talent consists of a roster of friends, theatre/filmschool buddies, and family.

      I own this book, bought it a weeks ago after listening to an interview with the author. Frankly, what a great purchase. It's one of the best titles I've ever read on the subject. You can catch the interview with the book's author here.

      The author even packed in a great extra chapter on cameras in the DVD. To say that this book is simply about making cheap action movies is a misnomer. It's really about how to make good looking products on a skin-tight budget, regardless of content. There's talk about color correction, 24p vs. 60i, tricks for shooting in public, etc. Wonderful, wonderful book.
  2. Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In People's Republic of California, Movies make YOU!

  3. Wouldn't you go Analog? by writermike · · Score: 1

    Ok, I'm kidding, but...

    If I were a DV Rebel, wouldn't I go all analog?

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
  4. Action Movie on the Cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Get video camera.
    2. Find willing amateur teen.
    3. ????
    4. Profit!

    1. Re:Action Movie on the Cheap by 680x0 · · Score: 1

      5. Spend some of the profits on amateur teen's hospital bill.

    2. Re:Action Movie on the Cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5. Spend some of the profits on amateur teen's hospital bill.

            Nahh, there's not many things 1 g of azithromycin won't fix...

    3. Re:Action Movie on the Cheap by geekinaseat · · Score: 1

      2. Find willing amateur teen.

      Sounds more like "porn movie on the cheap" to me.

      Damn, done it again...

      Do not expose your sex obsession in public, Do not expose your sex obs...

  5. Sounds like a good book by jshriverWVU · · Score: 1

    I've always tinkered with the idea of making a low-budget film. Anyone seen Clerks? I wonder what Kevin Smiths take on it is, or it would be nice if he would write a book like this. I'd buy it in a heartbeat :)

    1. Re:Sounds like a good book by Null537 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Robert Rodriguez made a popular low-budget flick, and then wrote a book about it. Interesting story, though it's for analog films not digital, now he tends to mention how much he loves digital.

    2. Re:Sounds like a good book by hedbonker · · Score: 1

      Robert Rodreguiz wrote the forward to this book.

    3. Re:Sounds like a good book by HungWeiLo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Robert Rodriguez made El Mariachi, later quasi-remade into Desperado, with a budget of only $6,000. He did everything from selling his own blood for fundraising to casting his own family members in the movie.

      On the El Mariachi DVD, there was a special feature called something like "The 10-minute film school of Robert Rodriguez". It probably talks about some of the stuff in his book, like how not to waste film. For example, if somebody throws a gun up to a balcony, but misses the balcony - don't throw the film away. Just cut the part after the gun misses the balcony and paste other footage which shows the gun landing on the balcony. Hollywood would have just scrapped the whole day's take and reshot the whole scene and what a waste that is. This is why old-school Hong Kong films like Hard Boiled can have more explosions and action than Die Hard, but only costing $4 million US to make.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    4. Re:Sounds like a good book by penp · · Score: 1

      you do know Kevin Smith maxed out a bunch of credit cards to make Clerks, right?

    5. Re:Sounds like a good book by gobbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the El Mariachi DVD, there was a special feature called something like "The 10-minute film school of Robert Rodriguez". It probably talks about some of the stuff in his book, like how not to waste film.

      I regularly show this to my students before they undertake a week of guerilla-style indie videomaking. It's a review of some raw footage from El Mariachi analysing how he pulled it off. It's full of tricks that translate from 16mm to DV, because they're about being cheap, cheap, cheap. As he puts it, "once you start that money hose flowing, it's hard to shut it off." The main thing is to be able to shoot with the edit in mind: the same scene from multiple angles to make it look like you have more cameras; vary framing and zoom during cut-away moments to keep the actors on a roll; be clever about props so you can edit for realism; mic placement is more important than equipment quality; minimize the need for ADR and foley (or, conversley, use them instead of expensive field recording); use a wide lens instead of steadicam; shoot in sequence when possible.

      Those are all good tips, but the main thing to making an indie flick despite a tiny budget? Story. Story story story. Most indie films suck, but if it's a well-edited moving story, nearly everything else is forgiven.

    6. Re:Sounds like a good book by Apotsy · · Score: 1
      For example, if somebody throws a gun up to a balcony, but misses the balcony - don't throw the film away. Just cut the part after the gun misses the balcony and paste other footage which shows the gun landing on the balcony.

      Good lord, do you realize how obvious something like that is?

      When I was a kid, I used to make silent Super-8 movies without the ability to edit. Think about that. Not only does the movie has to be shot in sequence, but every shot has to be correct. You get one take, and that's all. If something went wrong during a take, we would have to think on our feet and decide in a split second to either salvage the take or let go of the button and try to pick it up from there somehow. My brother and I got very disciplined very quickly. Our best movies were the ones where we planned ahead and rehearsed each shot before filming it, making sure it would work before actually commiting it to film. We even improvised some pretty slick little action sequences. I should scan that stuff and put it online at some point.

      It took us a long time to figure out the difference between what we imagined we were capturing on film and what we actually were getting. Not to mention we had to wait a week before seeing the results, which made us very careful. Later on, we got an 8mm splicer and could do some editing. Then even later we got a portable VHS machine and could buy time on a two-machine editing bay. Also, with video, we had the luxury of instant feedback. Surprisingly, all the luxuries of VHS production didn't make us better filmmakers. I honestly think we made better stuff when we had the most limitations doing silent Super-8 stuff with no editing.

      Damn, when I think about how limited we were, and how spoiled some of today's "filmmakers" are who can't even tell a simple story, well ... shit.

  6. Re:So how does this apply to my kind of movies? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    Unless there are pickup lines in there that work on improving the beauty of the "beautiful girl" you cast, I suspect you'd better get really good at CGI boob effects!

    --
    stuff |
  7. Re:So how does this apply to my kind of movies? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    What can I learn from this book to make that look even better than it is?

    Don't cast yourself in the film?

    BWAH HA HA HA HA! :)

    Aaahh, I crack me up.

  8. Re:So how does this apply to my kind of movies? by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is an excellent section on digitally removing C-section scars.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  9. $30 Film School by markbt73 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Another great reference, if you're interested, is $30 Film School by Michael Dean. I bought it a couple years ago when I was going to make a short film (I still am; it's just on the back-burner right now).

    This is the best way I can think of to stick it to the MPAA, though: Go make your OWN movie! You won't make any money, but DIY stuff always makes you feel good.

    --
    "Oh boy! Are we going to try something dangerous?"
  10. It's really not clear from this review... by Angostura · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... whether it is worth buying if you are not an After Effects user.

    1. Re:It's really not clear from this review... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, how about Cinelerra (yes but it runs on Linux)

    2. Re:It's really not clear from this review... by crusty_yet_benign · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's worth it. Although AE is the best generalist compositing tool out there that produces professional results (important, since "rebels" are likely to not have Nike Ad(TM) budgets).

    3. Re:It's really not clear from this review... by stripes · · Score: 1

      I have read a few sections of the book and there is a lot in it that isn't After Effects specific (or even DV specific). Things like filming from the bed of a pickup truck to avoid the need to get a film license from many local governments (most places - apparently - only require a license if you put your tripod on the ground -- so you can do handheld and get that shaky "this ain't hollywood" feel, or you can put your tripod in the pickup and roll). I haven't read many books on making a film though, so I don't know how good it is if you have already read other "make a film on a budget" AND you don't use After Effects.

  11. The best pickup line: by nietsch · · Score: 1

    Hello Ms modeling agency, I'd like to book Charlene Boobalicious for next Saturday, how much will that cost me?

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
  12. Foreword by Markus+Registrada · · Score: 1

    Most books have a "foreword".

  13. Writing by virgil_disgr4ce · · Score: 1

    Is this a book on post-production or filmmaking? There is a huge, huge difference. If this is a book mainly focused on technical details of production, and you're looking for something about how to *make a film,* please look elsewhere. Filmmaking is a state of mind. It requires loads of thought, introspection and *creativity.*

    The only way to make a film is to have an idea. Anything else is just a waste of time.

    1. Re:Writing by hedbonker · · Score: 1

      How insightful... The book covers pre and post as well as production.

    2. Re:Writing by virgil_disgr4ce · · Score: 1

      My point was that focusing solely on production (any and all segments) does not constitute a book about filmmaking. It constitutes a book on film production. Anyone can learn how to plan, stage, light, shoot, etc.; it takes an altogether different mindset to actually come up with a film. Too many "filmmaking" books leave out the crucial fact that you need an idea or *gasp* a story.

    3. Re:Writing by hedbonker · · Score: 1

      You're right. This is not a Linda Seger or Robert McKee book. It focuses on getting your story made into a video.

  14. Re:$30 Film School -- 100 PERCENT CORRECT! by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1
    There should have been a burst of new independant films, new independant music, new independant books, all from the Personal Computer.

    Too bad IBM trademarked PC and the population went to sleep. Next thing I knew the PC was lost in the corporate dungeons and the tubes of the internets.

    There was a brief moment, when Babylon 5 was using the Amiga to create it's Computer Graphics, that I thought the breakout could still occur. New sound cards were coming out, and I thought musicians would take advantage of this new power.

    Unfortunately only Rap musicians seemed to take note. Suddenly I saw all these independant Rap CDs being sold on the streets. But they were the only ones. Oh, well, maybe it's just going to take a little longer than I thought. Maybe the PC will free our minds and our data and unleash a wave of creativity never seen before.

    Or maybe not. :(

    FREE YOUR MINDS FROM THE INFLUENCE OF THE MAFIAA! CREATE ON YOUR OWN TERMS!

    --
    We have always been at war with Eurasia!
  15. Once you've made your film by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget to send them to your local film festival.

    http://www.bangshortfilmfestival.com/

  16. Kill 2 Birds With One Stone by cyberscan · · Score: 1

    Actually, you can make quite a bit of money on an indie film that is freely distributed. If the film is relatively popular, an embedded advertisement such as a scene in a local restaurant, or someone using the advertised product can bring a film maker a lot of revenue (especially if he is the seller of the advertised product). You also stick it to the MPAA. The media cartel hates competition, but they can no longer do any thing about it. The garage studio is going to put the media cartel out of business. It is now only a matter of time. The RIAA not only goes after innocent people, they also go after their children just to add fuel to the fire. An article on p2pnet.net shows just how much hatred the media cartel has generated for itself. The article is pretty informative, however, the comments are really telling!!!

    http://p2pnet.net/story/11878

  17. Speaking of DV by johansalk · · Score: 1

    If I were to buy a camera this year, what format should it be? I read widely that miniDV is being phased out.

    1. Re:Speaking of DV by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      MiniDv cameras are probably going to be replaced by HDV cameras, same 25Mb/s tape transport but mpeg2 encoded.
      They are HDV/DV switchable (or at least the one we have at work is; Sony Z1)
      MiniDV is okay but the sound isn't locked (1/2 frame of drift is the permissable error in the spec.)
      Trouble is that downgrading from HDV to DV can look a bit weird.

      We think that HDMI will replace IEEE1394 to harmonize equipment connectivity (not many IEEE1394 TVs around).

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Speaking of DV by daverabbitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't see HDMI ever replacing 1394, as they are two completely different technologies for completely different purposes.

      HDMI is a lossy (loss tolerant?) uncompressed digital transmission system for consumer displays with no error correction and no clock synchronisation, from which it would be quite difficult to reconstruct the exact same frame as was transmitted, it also (AFAIK) has no form of time-code or playback control system.

      IEEE-1394 is a multi-peer bus architecture, which supports lossless transmission of framed data, with tight latency constraints. On of the useful protocols supported by IEEE-1394 is DV-1394 which allows a verbatim DV encoded AV stream to be transferred, frame-synchronised, between compatible devices and with AVC can also provide integrated seek control and TC's. It is also ubiquitous on high end workstations and is available on almost all prosumer and professional video cameras as well as digital cinema camera's (though 1394a doesn't possess the bandwidth for transferring DC in real-time).

      To suggest that 1394 will be replaced by HDMI is like suggesting 20 years ago that YC video will be phased out because most (consumer) TV's only have composite or RF.

      If it wasn't for the enormous installed base I might accept the notion that DV1394 would be replaced by HD-SDI, but to suggest that it would be replaced by HDMI is ludicrous. I have noticed a trend in that a lot of new pro camera's are including GigE, especially the ones using random access media (XDCAM, others).

      I'd also like to note that I haven't seen any editing equipment or computer video grabbers which will accept an HDMI input, as opposed to the countless systems supporting both HD-SDI and 1394.

      --
      What could be better than a jet powered motorcycle? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8l6GTHLSWE
    3. Re:Speaking of DV by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Oh ok, thank for that (no sarcasm intended).

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  18. Yes. It's worth it anyway. by voidstin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The book is really a-z from acquisition to delivery. If you're looking to shoot on prosumer cameras and edit on prosumer gear, there's something in here for you.

    If you're not using After effects, what are you using? The book concentrates on getting professional level finishing and effects out of prosumer level tools. Basically, with the finishing chapter, he's showing you how to replace a Smoke with AE and some elbow grease. If you're using something higher end (Flame/Nitris/Nuke/etc), it probably got stuff you already know how to do in your app, but you'll pick up some handy tips and the book may still be worth picking up.

    The scripts alone are worth the price of the book. The color correction thumbnail script is genius.

    I'd also look at Colorista - his GPU assisted color correction plugin that evolved out of one of the included scripts. Also super cool.

  19. Re:$30 Film School -- 100 PERCENT CORRECT! by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

    It's not a question of corporate dungeons etc. etc. I know people who were doing computer generated music 30 years ago when that idea was really new and you had to have access to a really serious machine (for its day) to do anything... problem is most people didn't really want to listen to it. Most people still don't want to listen to anything drastically different than what they were exposed to growing up. Take Sitar music or Gamelan... age old music, very popular from whence it came, but most North Americans wouldn't enjoy listening to it.

    And a lot of the things people did when sound cards showed up cheap enough to be ubiquitous... well... it was just harsh.

    I think the single thing most likely to encourage creativity and diversity is pirating. The economics are shifting and the profit will be gone which in turn means the days of "supergroups" and "superstars" is ending... the money just isn't there. That in turn will open things up to a lot of people. It's pretty much the case now that anyone with a few bucks will be able to make as much music, with as much complexity, as they want and be able to distribute it to as many people as want to listen to it. Music critics will become much more important. I think will live performances, something computer generated music tends to fall down on, will become much more common as well.

    The same is true of movies and TV... the money is disappearing and soon it just won't be viable to have big production costs. Synthetic actors are getting better and better and processing power for special effects is getting cheaper and cheaper. Look at TV and how many reality (read: cheap to make) shows occupy the schedule. Soon enough the money won't be there to keep large interests in the game and then small independents will have more and more opportunity to obtain audience share.

    I think we are witnessing the death of entertainment as we know it. Kids being born now will have difficulty relating to the idea of "network tv" and so on... it will be like describing the day before TV to today's kids. And the replacement will in many ways resemble entertainment from a century ago or more.

    --
    The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
  20. Re:So how does this apply to my kind of movies? by winkydink · · Score: 1

    In the movies I'd like to make the guy introduces a beautiful girl, what follows is groping, fellating, cunniliting, copulatin and ejaculating. What can I learn from this book to make that look even better than it is?

    Um, maybe the book talks about what will happen when you turn 14 next year?

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  21. Re:$30 Film School -- 100 PERCENT CORRECT! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately only Rap musicians seemed to take note.

    If you think rap musicians are the only ones who took to the computer to create music, you could not be more wrong.
    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  22. Peripheral Note: Hash Animation:Master by RonBurk · · Score: 1

    I think one of the most overlooked tools for an amateur filmmaker is Martin Hash's Animation Master. $300 (cheaper for students). True, it's sold as an animation product, but you can load up your video as a rotoscope and animate (or just plain tinker) over the top of it. People sell "titling" software for more than that, and you can assuredly do the most whizbang titling you can imagine with this feature-jammed package, plus a whole lot more.

    On the downside, any full-featured animation software is darn complex, so you need some geek attitude to get into A:M. OTOH, there's plenty of amateur talent that uses the package, so if you have any budget at all, you might be able buy the work you need.

    Disclaimer: I sound like I own stock in the company, but they actually cost me money, since I tend to buy a new upgrade every year. All I get in return is that the relatives actually ask to see my home movies instead of fleeing the room when the DVD goes in :-).

  23. Re:What camera to get by voidstin · · Score: 1

    Get what you like and what you can afford. For my home stuff, I use the video functionality of my Canon Powershot still camera way more than I ever used my miniDV camera.

    If you're really planning on making a movie, or need to shoot long form stuff,, get an HDV camera. The new cameras (like the canon HV20) are around $1100, small and have HDMI ports , so you can plug 'em right into your plasma/whatever, but of more interest to pro video folk (and most likely nerds) you can capture right off the sensor via HDMI, skipping HDMI compression. So, if you need to do greenscreen or need a REALLY nice image, that will come in handy.

    For general purpose use? Make sure the still cameras dont do what you need. Save the extra $500-$4500, and rent a Z1U or a XLH1 for the big violin recital....

  24. Re:So how does this apply to my kind of movies? by PenguSven · · Score: 1, Funny

    Nothing, but i can tell you that you need background music going "Bow Chica Wow Wow"

    --
    What is...?
  25. There are better books by teflaime · · Score: 1

    D. B. Gilles' The Portable Film School is both more accessible and more insightful. Michael Dean's $30 Film School has a better look at pre-production. Richard Pepperman's The Eye iS Quicker is better for post.

  26. Re:$30 Film School -- 100 PERCENT CORRECT! by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1
    You're probably right, but rappers have the visibility where I live. I really don't see any other type of music being sold on the streets of Berkeley, Oakland, San Francisco, or even Sausalito. All of those cities are in California in case you're not from the US.

    I believe you, I just don't see much evidence here. What are you seeing and in what locations?

    --
    We have always been at war with Eurasia!
  27. Re:$30 Film School -- 100 PERCENT CORRECT! by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1
    Very interesting post. Too bad no one modded you up.

    I think you're right on a lot of points. For instance I was reading a few weeks ago that the top CDs sold 30,000 copies recently. A few years ago that wouldn't have been enough to land a CD in the top 30. So sales, and the money, are dropping. Like you, I see hope in this for an independant future.

    The computer is such a powerful tool and its cost is steadily dropping. I think of characters like Gollum from Lord Of The Rings and the backgrounds from Sky Captain and wonder what a small group of people could do if they had the distribution.

    We may see this soon. I've noticed over the years that media is getting smaller. Have you noticed how people are actually starting to watch those small images on YouTube? How about all those people who actually watch content on PSPs, or Video iPods. MP3s actually have less content than CDs yet the guy that sits in the cube across from me SOLD all of his CDs after converting them to MP3s. He seems to be happy.

    If the content of the future is in such small packages, the costs to produce it will go down, and the computer power needed to generate it will also decline. :)

    There is hope in the future.

    --
    We have always been at war with Eurasia!
  28. Additional review with links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's another short review but with handy links to related topics:

    http://msp.sfsu.edu/Instructors/rey/aepage/extras/ DVRebelsreview.html

    Rich