Slashdot Mirror


Daylight Saving Change Saved No Power

Brett writes "Results from energy companies are coming in, and the word is that moving Daylight Saving Time forward three weeks had no measurable impact on power consumption. The attempt by the US Congress to make it look like they were doing something about the energy crisis has been exposed as the waste it is. But the new DST is probably here to stay — letting the bill expire would mean re-patching a lot of systems again next year. So much for saving energy."

141 of 766 comments (clear)

  1. But...but.. by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Funny

    But, the DST change was one of the ONLY things they could agree on!!!!

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:But...but.. by Taelron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The whole thing has been a joke and a colossal waste of money and resources... Personally I'd rather see Daylight savings time be tossed out entirely... Though Microsoft is loving it.

      http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifean22

      If you still had a Windows 2000 server on your network you had to either buy new software and give microsoft your money or pay $4000 to buy the DST hotfixes. Ironically leading up to change and for atleast one week afterwords you had to pay the $4000 fee to receive the hot fix. Now 3 weeks later they offer you a free manual update utility or the option to buy the $4000 hotfix. *The free manual utility was NOT available when everyone was rushing to update their older servers* Links to the old tech bulletin that only offered the pay for hotfix is no longer valid.

      So out of curriosity, how much money did Microsoft make off the daylight savings change?

    2. Re:But...but.. by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm against puppies and kittens when they're attacking the children. Won't somebody please think of the children?

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    3. Re:But...but.. by Misch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Won't somebody please think of the children?

      Where's Mark Foley when you need him?

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
  2. Quit'cher Bitchin' by duerra · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Look, I understand people that want to take a stab at the administration - Bush's administration has done far more harm than good, but come on - bashing like this summary is just not necessary. This was a widely supported idea beyond just the US - a number of countries followed suit in the idea. At the very least, it didn't HURT anything - so why bitch about it so much? Oh well, you had to patch your systems. It's over and done with. No need to try and make this into a "prime opportunity" to bash the administration for at least trying. There's plenty of other things to gripe about when it comes to this administration - learn to pick your fights, otherwise you just end up looking like a giant douche.... or a turd sandwich.

    1. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by qwijibo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You must work for a small company that takes part in reality if you already did the patching. There was no compelling business justification for patching the systems, so failing to get rid of the change means it remains on the eternal todo list, right next to backups. The joys of administering systems for a large bank.

    2. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by MeanderingMind · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, it's arguable it did hurt a number of things.

      1) A significant amount of manpower had to be expended in order to assure that the computer systems across the world supporting this change were ready for it.

      2) A number of home and business computer systems alike failed to change, sometimes resulting in mischeduled meetings and moderate confusion.

      3) Congress wasted time on this bill that could have been spent getting something important done, such as finally hammering out a definate government policy on Stem Cell research, abortions, or actually making a true impact on the energy issue we face.

      Time and money were wasted, for an energy revenue of nil. It may not have increased energy costs, but costs in general were incurred.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    3. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by Giolon · · Score: 5, Funny

      It didn't hurt anything? My "automatic" clock that I bought a few years ago is now worthless. It's supposed to automatically change based on the old DST schedule. Now, I have to manually turn it ahead myself, then a few weeks later, remember to manually turn it back because it automatically went forward on the old scehdule. Ditto for the fall. It's obnoxious. The government owes me a new automatic clock.

    4. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Same here, remembered about it on the new DST change. But was confused when it suddenly jumped an hour forward this Sunday. An no way to patch the sucker. Strange thing is its "Automatic Time Setting" seems to be some sorta trick. Pull it from the wall, replug, and it "automatically" sets it to the wrong time..

    5. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Informative

      The reason is it's yet more proof it's a do nothing Congress. Even when they do something it has no positive effect. Business sees energy reform cutting into their short term bottom line and that's all most care about so don't expect Congress to get off their asses anytime soon. Alot of the changes will save money over time but it'll cut into their short term profits so they are seen as a bad thing. Any time you do anything some one isn't going to like it so Congress has taken the stance of simply doing nothing. They are big on committes and making statements but they rarely take proactive action on anything. We need leadership not smoke and mirrors. They would have accomplished far more by requiring a 5% or 10% increase in gas mileage. The car companies could easily meet those goals and it would save a huge amount of oil. Even that is seen as draconian in the Bush administration.

    6. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by Z0mb1eman · · Score: 3, Informative

      This was a widely supported idea beyond just the US - a number of countries followed suit in the idea

      A number of countries followed suit out of necessity to stay synchronized with U.S. businesses, rather than because of any particular support for the idea.

      --
      ClutterMe.com - easiest site creation on the Net. Just click and type.
    7. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by debest · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This was a widely supported idea beyond just the US - a number of countries followed suit in the idea.

      I've checked Wikipedia, and I didn't see much of any countries that have followed the USA on this initiative other than Canada. Even Mexico didn't follow (assuming the ariticle is accurate).

      I live in Canada, and I can tell you that we followed out of economic necessity, and no other reason. Our economy is so tied to America (in terms of cross-border business) that we realistically had no choice. But we certainly don't like it, especially those further north: with the pushing of the clock so much earlier this year, people were heading to work and kids were walking to school in pitch-black darkness again.

      And, of course, we had the same PITA tech issues with the time change the Americans had. For Canadians in general, the negatives of this change outweighed the positive by a long shot.
      --
      Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    8. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by raju1kabir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So yeah, it hurt a lot.

      Some tiny number of people had to wrestle with Windows inanity (and that's a self-selected group of people who voluntarily took jobs that require wrestling with Windows inanity).

      Meanwhile, a huge number of people get a quality-of-life boost from the extra daylight in the evening, which makes it more pleasant to walk home from work, to run late-afternoon errands, or just to enjoy some time outdoors on nice spring and autumn days.

      In an ideal world they'd keep pushing it back until the start and end finally met, and then abolish it entirely, leaving the clocks on summer time all year round. But until that time, at least things are a bit better. And next time they change it, you Windows-wrestlers will know what to do.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    9. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by raehl · · Score: 3, Funny

      Congress wasted time on this bill that could have been spent getting something important done, such as finally hammering out a definate government policy on Stem Cell research, abortions

      Yeah, because Congress totally would have accomplished something on THOSE deadlock issues....

    10. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by 2short · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Congress wasted time on this bill that could have been spent getting something important done"

      Dude, this is the previous (Republican controlled) Congress we're talking about. They spent the vast majority of their time on vacation. They convened for fewer days than any Congress in a hundred years. I suppose they could have used the time spent debating this bill to do something meaningful, but they weren't exactly hurting for time.

    11. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by nsayer · · Score: 2, Informative
      In an ideal world they'd keep pushing it back until the start and end finally met,

      This would cause problems in northern latitudes during the winter. The sun potentially wouldn't rise until very late in the morning, which would be tres suck. The last time they tried this was during WWII, and there was a noted rise in the early morning accident rate in the winter. Of course, you could also partially blame that on the blackouts, but then without War Time the blackouts wouldn't have had as much impact in the later morning hours.

    12. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by raju1kabir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Tiny number?!? Where in hell have you been?

      There are almost 400 million people in the USA. A tiny number of those are Windows sysadmins.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    13. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was late to work that day because no alarm clock whether it be cell phone or manual alarm could cope with the automatic change.

      What do you mean no manual alarm could cope? How did manual alarms cope before the change? Thats right you set it before you went to bed, This isn't rocket science. One more point. The Time change occurred on Sunday morning at or about 2am. You had a whole day to look at your clock and figure out it was a hour off before you went to be Sunday night. It's not DST fault you were late to work it was your fault. Nice try though

      Oh and for the record my cell phone did change on it's own on time.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    14. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by codemachine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yet most people in Saskatchewan would bitch about how behind the times the province is for not going along with the idiocy that is DST.

      Any oil companies based in Alberta (which observes DST) just have their Saskatchewan employees go to work an hour earlier in the summer. Which proves it really isn't that hard to change your business hours to accomodate the season.

      I think this is a case where Saskatchewan is so far "behind the times" that they may be more "modern" than everyone else. With the 9-5 workday losing significance all the time, DST is already becoming less and less relevant anyhow. It will likely continue to be less relevant until it is finally abolished. Hopefully Saskatchewan doesn't decide to adopt it right before it becomes totally obsolete.

      As you said, I think Saskatchewan has it right, and I hope that they don't change it just to be like everyone else. Because in this instance, what everyone else is doing doesn't make sense anymore.

    15. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by ElectricRook · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They convened for fewer days than any Congress in a hundred years.

      You say that like it's a bad thing...

      Congress _not_ imposing their personal culture (lawyer culture at that) on folks living 3K miles away is a much better thing.

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    16. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by Peter+Mork · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh and for the record my cell phone did change on it's own on time.

      So did mine ... 2 weeks after the new and improved DST. In fact, math would be much easier if pi were to equal 3. Why don't we just frak around with other constants. While we're at it, e is pretty close to 3.

      In short, why should I have to reset my alarm so that you can stay up an extra hour. When you go to bed is your business, not mine. Let's keep the Congress out of it!

    17. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by amper · · Score: 2

      Congress wasted time on this bill that could have been spent getting something important done, such as finally hammering out a definate government policy on Stem Cell research, abortions, or actually making a true impact on the energy issue we face.

      This may come as a shock to you, but the Supreme Court of the United States hammered out a definite policy on abortion way back in 1973.

    18. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by LordKronos · · Score: 3, Funny

      There are almost 400 million people in the USA

      You forgot the fine print:
      Margin of error: +/- 33%
    19. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by raju1kabir · · Score: 4, Funny

      You people have no vision. When I make a Slashdot comment, I want it to stand the test of time. We'll see who's laughing in 2050.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    20. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by LordKronos · · Score: 2, Funny

      you set it before you went to bed

      That may work alright in the spring, but what happens when fall comes around?

      -time for bed...let me just adjust my alarm clock first....
      -oh, look...I still have an hour before bed. I'll go watch the TV
      -that's odd, my favorite show isn't on at its usual time .......
      -time for bed...let me just adjust my alarm clock first....
    21. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by SScorpio · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly, and my fucking alarm clock now as the exact same issue where I have to manually change the time twice and there is no patch for it. I just have to put up with it until I replace it which if it's like my last clock won't be for at least another decade.

    22. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if they did "just change it" like their clocks on their microwave and VCR, then they've probably actually set their computer's clock forward one hour, rather than setting the timezone correctly.

      This has the nice affect that any time their computer tries to communicate with another device, it's now announcing it has the wrong time. The most obvious effect will be in the Date: header in emails which will be an hour out; it could also have some affect on things like HTTP caching (the Last-Modified and Expires headers specify a time in UTC).

      Computers and other network-connected devices are not "just another clock", and most people don't realise you need to adjust the timezone, not just the time shown by the clock in system tray.

      I'm in Western Australia which last summer* had DST for the first time in ages, and this was a significant problem -- made worse by the fact that Microsoft apparently didn't give a shit. We had problems with Exchange appointments for a long time because MSFT couldn't be bothered updating part of the system (it seems Exchange uses some other way of determining timezones other than the system timezone database..?).

      * - our summer being Dec-Feb, and our first DST trial period just ended.

    23. Re:Quit'cher Bitchin' by TempeTerra · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you're futureproofing, do it right: 640 million people should be enough for anyone.

      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
  3. Shocked by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought feel-good legislation always worked. :-/

  4. Fine by me... by garcia · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reuters spoke with Jason Cuevas, spokesman for Southern Co. power, who said it plainly: "We haven't seen any measurable impact."

    While I had no doubts in my mind that this wouldn't save a dime, I'm still pleased with the fact that because I work 9:30 to 6pm I see daylight on my drive home three weeks earlier than usual. For me, I'd prefer it's this way all year long but I don't have kids that ride a school bus (isn't that the main reason they claim we do this in the first place?)

    1. Re:Fine by me... by General+Fault · · Score: 5, Informative

      The people that know the most of anybody on the planet about forecasting the effects of DST sit about 20-50ft from me. We develop software that is designed to predict electrical and gas usage based on factors such as weather, time of day (including DST), holidays, etc. I wish they had asked us our opinions or at least used our software to forecast the effects of their new policy before enacting it. You see, DST was designed before A/C was in widespread use. DST saved electricity by shifting working hours into more daylight. However, with the advent of huge A/C and heat-pumps deployed in every office, factory and store in America, DST now shifts the workday into hotter hours. As a result the DST effect has slowly dwindled (with a little work I could tell you just how much it has dwindled), and will soon reverse. The new DST times are more than likely to accelerate the problem.

      --
      No man is an island... But I wouldn't mind having a bigger moat.
    2. Re:Fine by me... by myyrk · · Score: 2, Informative

      DST was conceived by Benjamin Franklin in 1784.

    3. Re:Fine by me... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Absolutely! Amazingly enough, this is probably the first piece of legislation in the history of the world which, while typically failing to do what they claimed it would do, had a positive affect: it increased the quality of life for those it impacted! I've personally been overjoyed to have an extra hour of daylight, allowing me to go out and do things in the evening which I'd not normally be able to do during the evening, instead having to wait for the weekend - ie, going to the park with my son, going for a bike ride, or going shooting. I'm not really using more energy (I'm outdoors most of the time), and I don't have to confine my leasure activity to the weekend!

      Really, I couldn't be more pleased.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    4. Re:Fine by me... by paradoja · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure he did so: William Willet

  5. alternatively... by boarder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... we can just get rid of DST altogether, since it has been shown to not do dick except annoy people and cost companies money in IT time.

    Keep it summer time year round if you ask me.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
    1. Re:alternatively... by Moridineas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, one other thing I was going to ask...

      If you don't approve of DST, do you also not approve of time zones? Both are an attempt to "standardize" day/night conditions to the hours of the day. Some countries--huge ones like China--don't have timezones, so it's obviously possible.

      Are you advocating that the US gets rid of timezones too? As you say, it WOULD be easier (for programmers primarily!) to standardize on GMT/UTC.

    2. Re:alternatively... by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I do live somewhere where there is less than 6 hours of daylight on the shortest day of the year, and daylight savings time has no effect. Why? Because it isn't in effect in the winter. As for the summer, what does having the sun set at 11 p.m. or 12 a.m. really effect? You either learn to deal with 24 hour light (yes, even in the middle of the short nights, there is still twilight), or you move. An hour here or there makes no difference in 24 hour light. So, what was your point about those of us that live near the Arctic (or Antatctic) Circle?

    3. Re:alternatively... by prockcore · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe you should live somewhere where there is less than 6 hours of daylight during the shortest day of the year and see if you still have the same view.


      The shortest day of the year happens on STANDARD TIME.. DST has no affect on the shortest day of the year!
    4. Re:alternatively... by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is never a time when that is the case. Sunset was at 5-5:30 when DST went into effect. Sunset will get later and later, but never was sunset 3:30 before DST. What you want is all clocks ahead an hour or two all year long. That arguement may be valid, but is irrelevant to setting clocks ahead about the time there is 12 hours of sun-up world-wide. It would be nice to change the clocks to have the sun come up at 5 p.m. in the winter when there will be only a few hours of sunlight. You would go to bed at sunset at a reasonable hour. But again, what happens on days where the sun sets at 3:30 is irrelevant to the issue of DST.

    5. Re:alternatively... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Abolishing 9-5 would have a significant environmental impact. Think how long the average American nine-'til-fiver spends stuck in traffic because everyone is travelling to work at the same time. If people started work at 8-10 and worked until 4-6, then the rush would be spread out over two hours, reducing congestion and thus emissions.

      Do something for the environment today; put as many of your workers as possible on flexitime. You're also likely to end up with a happier workforce, if they spend less time getting to and from work every morning.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. Never mind lost productivity... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just two quick examples of the COST of the change, due to lost productivity - I live in the Eastern US, and someone in Ireland missed a conference call with us because everyone on both sides of the Atlantic thought that Ireland was always 5 hours ahead (for some reason, people found it impossible to fathom that this wasnt the case if we changes our clock and they didn't, but whatever). Example number two - a contractor in brazil was going to take down our servers at 5:00 EDST but actually took them down at 4:00 since they didnt know about the time change.

    1. Re:Never mind lost productivity... by krlynch · · Score: 2, Informative
      I live in the Eastern US, and someone in Ireland missed a conference call with us because everyone on both sides of the Atlantic thought that Ireland was always 5 hours ahead

      Even before this change, there was a difference in the start dates of Daylight Saving and Summer Time across the Atlantic; for the last decade, it was a one week difference at the start. Before then, all hell broke loose across Europe, as different countries started and ended at different times. Most of the world outside Europe and North America doesn't bother with EVER changing their clocks, but those in the Southern Hemisphere that DO observe Daylight Saving do so roughly 180 days out of phase with the Northern Hemisphere. The time deltas between two points on the globe can differ by many hours (up to three!) throughout the year due to DST changes. Dealing with an international scientific collaboration as I do sensitizes you to the insanity of DST rather rapidly :-)

    2. Re:Never mind lost productivity... by curunir · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Brazil example is a good illustration of what makes the DST change so annoying.

      I live in California, so I'm on pacific time. Brazil's major cities are, IIRC, two time zones ahead of eastern time. So if I know the time in California, how do I figure out the time in Brazil? Well, I have to know what day of the year it is. It's 5 time zones ahead of me, but it can either 5 hours ahead during the times of the year when the US has switched its time and Brazil hasn't yet switched theirs. Or it can be 4 (US summer) or 6 (Brazilian summer) if both have switched.

      If we got rid of this nonsense, Brazil would be 5 hours ahead. Period.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    3. Re:Never mind lost productivity... by RobertLTux · · Score: 2, Informative

      easyish solution next time send a link to the timeanddate.com world clock with your cities coded in

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  7. I wish they change this stuff more often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    $200/hr * 20 * 8 clients = enough cha ching to enjoy this crap.

  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. Are you high? by ObiWanStevobi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First of all, this is a move by congress, no one is bashing "The Administration"

    No harm, no foul, huh? How about the time it took to patch my file transfer program. I'm sure my employers don't appreciate the extra money spent. Not to mention tying up our IT staff trying to get time clocks/etc. fixed when the Windows patch f#$%ed up the time then fixed it again two days later. There's two days of pay for the IT staff, not to mention lost time where other things didn't get fixed.

    And it's us who look like giant douches for complaining?!!

    1. Re:Are you high? by GrayCalx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And it's us who look like giant douches for complaining?!!

      No, you don't look like a giant douche for complaining. I think the original poster was responding more to the tone of the summary which seemed... angry that they even attempted something to conserve energy.

      I don't think its a liberal/conservative thing, but I do think its a great example of you're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't for the government. Had they not changed DST after it was proposed the environmentalists (or rather those wanting to conserve energy) would be complaining, "The government never does anything to even TRY to conserve power!"

      Someone had this idea. It didn't work (surprise, surprise) and now you have people complaining, "I can't believe you even TRIED this?!?"

      So I'm very sorry that you had so much additional work to do and your company lost so much money, but if it helps there is probably an environmentalist somewhere who is smiling... or at least frowning less.

      /damned if you do damned if you don't.
      //can't please all of the people all of the time.

    2. Re:Are you high? by toddestan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, he could have used a signing statement saying that he wasn't going to follow the new rules, then follow through by not changing the clocks in the oval office. That would have shown them!

  10. Fuel Usage by duplicate-nickname · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember a local news story the week of the 11th stating that there was actually an increase in gas use after the DST change because people were driving more now that it stay light out later.

    --

    ÕÕ

  11. In other news by ccbutler · · Score: 5, Funny

    Water utilities claim there was no measureable impact to water consumption after their "hold your pee in for an hour before going to the bathroom" campaign wrapped up last weekend, in an effort to minimize water consumption and save the planet of resources. =P

  12. More effort and labor spent by HungWeiLo · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I had to switch my clock back on Ubuntu (the timezone fix did not make it in the apt-get updates somehow), my makefile on my hour-long build project refused to build (citing misalignment of the timestamps of the files). So I had to delete all my files and fetch them all again after I put the clock back to the way it was before.

    After that, I turned on my amp and surround sound system and watched a movie during lunch while blasting away the AC because I got so hot from all the work.

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  13. It would mean REMOVING patches... by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...and I'm all for it!

    This DST2007 thing has been a real pain in my ass. I know that the US government hates to admit failure, so we won't leave Iraq and we won't back off on DST2007... wish we would though. It has caused a lot of problems.

  14. Extra sunshine isn't such a good thing. by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Funny
    I'm not suprised. DST is a very bad idea. All that extra sunshine makes it hotter. This burns the lawn and means you need more air conditioning.

    On the flip side though, all the exta sunshine makes crops grow better so it should make farmers happier!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Extra sunshine isn't such a good thing. by eln · · Score: 3, Funny

      Speak for yourself. I've been saving daylight for decades, and I've had enough. My whole garage is filled with jars of daylight. The last thing I need is MORE daylight savings.

      Sure, I could put all of that daylight into a Daylight Savings Bank, but I don't trust those guys. I don't need some big corporation earning fat interest loaning my daylight out to other people and giving me a 0.4% APR on it.

  15. Re:It's also been unseasonably warm by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You cant extrapolate "it doesnt help" from one months worth of data.


    You can with a change in DST that is supposed to save energy on both ends, and only affects one month on each end.

    For other things, maybe not.
  16. Re:Who cares about energy savings by sh00z · · Score: 2, Insightful

    or, alternatively: three more weeks with LESS sunlight BEFORE work actually do something (run, bike, ...) is all that matters. And I've been robbed. Who cares if it's sunny after work? Daylight when I wake up is a lot more important.

  17. Modded funny? by TheDarkener · · Score: 4, Informative

    If I had mod points, I'd mod Informative!!

    Seriously, this "useful" change was nothing but a waste of time, AND clocks. All those clocks/devices that automatically change according to the standardized time? Useless. Software patches? Quite impossible for most.

    Looks like the waste management facilities will see a rise in borked electronics because of this - and that does precisely 0 for the environment, too.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:Modded funny? by qwijibo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm going to start a charity to collect these DST impaired clocks. You can ship me your clocks and I will distribute them to chronometer-impaired individuals throughout the non-DST observing state of Arizona.

    2. Re:Modded funny? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you serious? Because my wife has one of these clocks by her bed. I can't bear to hear her complain about the wonderful 109th Congress four times a year.

      These people in Arizona are going to have NO EXCUSE for oversleeping with all the used alarm clocks they're going to get.

  18. I don't. by mobby_6kl · · Score: 4, Funny

    In fact, I fucking hate it. The sun is trying to kill me, and giving it any more opportunities to do that doesn't make me any happier.

  19. Carbon-offset by rodney+dill · · Score: 3, Funny

    I used my saved energy as a carbon offset to burn additional energy.

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
  20. Re:there are other benifits to the new DST change. by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 3, Funny

    "exercise outside"

    Wrong web site...

    We're struggling with sun glare on the screen while firing up Counter Strike...

    --
    Sleep is for the Weak
  21. Selfish Bastard by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not for those of us who have visual overstimulation induced migraines. This just means that they've stolen several hours of my precious DARKNESS in return for no monetary advantage.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  22. Re:I like the extra daylight though by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is why Arizona doesn't participate in this stupidity.

    Extra daylight in the FRIGGING DESERT is NOT helpful. People don't come out until after 7pm even in normal time. Want the cafes and outdoor busineses to stay closed until 1030pm, or do you want them to waste more water with those evaporative coolers (garden misters) trying to keep the locals from passing out outdoors? Until nightfall they're all sucking every last watt out of their homes barricaded inside on air-conditioned life-support! Cool evenings save energy. The sooner it arrives the better, and less energy and water is used as a result. And don't get me started on heat islands!

    It's not 59-90f degrees everywhere in the USA ya know.

  23. Look on the bright side... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    3) Congress wasted time on this bill that could have been spent getting something important done, such as finally hammering out a definate government policy on Stem Cell research, abortions, or actually making a true impact on the energy issue we face.

    See, that's the glass-half-empty talking. Just look on the bright side: When they were wasting their time turning out this ridiculous waste of time and paper, it meant that they weren't really screwing anything else up!

    Please, Congress, do us all a favor: spend your time on things like creating new "National $FOO Week"s. What -- there aren't any free weeks left? Okay, I've got one: why don't you guys try to fix the date of Easter? I'm sure that won't take you too long.

    The more idiotic, banal stuff that I know the Congresscritters are doing, the better it makes me feel, because at least I know they're staying out of trouble. It's when they go quiet for a while that I start to worry. The further away they stay from the "real issues," the happier I am. As absolutely fucked as the system we have is, don't you even think for a moment that with hard work and diligence, they couldn't make it at least ten times worse.

    Congratulations, Congress, on your brilliant plan. By all means, keep up the great work.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Look on the bright side... by Chmcginn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The fact that there's more "funny" than "insightful" mods on this comment worries me.

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    2. Re:Look on the bright side... by PureApple · · Score: 2, Funny

      Laughing is so close to crying... :( :)

  24. Re:Amen by nebaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    some schoolkids have to wait for the bus in the dark

    I never understood school schedules. It has been shown that teenagers naturally wake up later in the day, and that elementary school students wake up earlier. Yet it is the elementary schools that start at 8:30 and the high schools that start at 7:30. Why not make school like work, where it runs 9-5, on a schedule more matching that of the parents? Some will counter that high school students have jobs in the evening, so let them start earlier. Why should jobs drive school schedules?

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
  25. Re:Who cares about energy savings by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fine. You like more light. GET UP EARLIER. And leave my clock alone.

    I _really_ dislike getting up before dawn. I mean deep viceral psychological bio-cycle "why am I getting up at night" kind of dislike. Just when dawn was arriving at a decent time, you "I want more light so I'll force everyone else to change their schedules" people make me get up at 5:00AM EST instead of 6AM (and now you're talking about pushing it back to 4:00AM?!?).

    The clock reflects astronomical realities of earth/sun positioning. Noon is supposed to mean the sun is overhead, mid-day. Cocky people then decide they don't like that arrangement, and declare what _is_ shall be different from what they _want_ reality to be. A rose by any other name may smell as sweet, and calling dung a "rose" doesn't make it smell any better. Calling 5:00AM "6:00AM Daylight Saving Time" doesn't change the fact that it's really 5:00AM, and the combination of light and circadian rhythms means it's still time to sleep.

    It's almost enough to make me move to Arizona where they ignore this nonsense.

    Seriously, man - it really messes up my internal clock. Midnight to six is my time to _sleep_; mess with that, and you're messing with my ability to function.

    You want more light? YOU get up earlier. Leave my clock alone; I'll be a lot more productive that way.

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
  26. Prior experience by asackett · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What amazes me about the whole thing is that nobody bothered to look back to 1973 when Nixon did essentially the same thing. No energy was saved then, either.

    --

    Warning: This signature may offend some viewers.

    1. Re:Prior experience by jambarama · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Daylight savings doesn't save energy, but it does do something. It gives us more daylight at night. Which gives us more time for shopping and spending money. I read a report showing a jump in retail sales the last the last time they changed daylight savings.

      And this year the candy companies hit the holy grail. An hour more light for halloween, and trick-or-treating.

  27. Useful to us! by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm a lobbyist with the North American Automatically Time Changing Clock, Watch and Timepiece Manufacturers Association and we paid good money to have this bill passed so that we can sell more automatically changing clocks, watches and timepieces.

    Record profits this year, my friend, record profits. You should have invested in manufacturers of automatically changing clocks, watches and timepieces.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Useful to us! by 511pf · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm also lobbyist - with the North American Pro-Obesity, Chocolate Loving Candy Manufacturers Association and we paid good money to have this bill passed so that Halloween will have an extra hour of daylight this year.

      Record profits this year, my friend, record profits. You should have invested in manufacturers of chocolate, bon-bons and candy-bars.

  28. Reminds me of Spaceballs by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Do something!" (Col. Sanders on the intercom)

  29. Re:I like the extra daylight though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The time change did not affect the amount of daylight, or the number of hours over which that daylight was distributed.

    Check out the brain on Brad. OMG I THOUGHT CHANGING MY CLOCK TIME ACTUALLY ALTERED THE TILT OF THE EARTH!!1!!!111! Thank you DragonWriter!

  30. Re:It's also been unseasonably warm by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We only have one data element right now.


    We have quite a few; first, its supposed to reduce it by reducing daily demand, and its supposed to do it generally across the nation. You don't need multiple years of data to get a decent idea of what is going on with that; you can look at the data from one month daily and by region, and see to what degree it appears to be true. Or you could look at the overall average over all regions and days, and see that the number is not different that what would have been expected without the change.

    Of course, one might posit that there is some reason to expect that this month was systematically atypical in a way which would distort the results, but those making that claim ought to have something to point to to justify it.

    Can you prove to me that the power we saved wasnt offset by the power used to deal with an unseasonably warm spring?


    First, "unseasonably warm spring" is somewhat irrelevant (and not established) as its not even 2 weeks into the 13 weeks of Spring, yet, and a significant portion of the new DST time is in winter.

    Secondly, even considering the right time period, where is the evidence that an unseasonably warm March increases energy demand? Certainly, in the hottest areas it may increase cooling demand, but in much of the country a warm late-winter-to-early-spring is going to save energy by reducing cooling demand.

  31. Time in general by smith6174 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think all of us can agree that in a perfect world, the rest of the goofballs out there would pay as much attention to this as we Slashdot readers have. I turn my lights on when I need to see in the dark. I go to my appointments on time, no matter what numbers the government or anyone else tells me that time is called. Also, what is the deal with time zones? I think this is the same issue. I feel the same when I wake up at 8am eastern time as when I wake up at 5am pacific time. Seriously, this is all stupid and old fashioned. I suggest that anyone who cares about this start using GMT exclusively in their dealings, especially if those dealings are as meaningless as mine.

  32. PG&E made some money from me by aegl · · Score: 2, Informative
    PG&E (Pacific Gas & Electric) whined to the public utilities commission that it would cost them $35M to go out and reprogram all the time-of-use meters. So the PUC let them stick with the first Sunday in April, last Sunday in October rules.

    For me this meant that the "part-peak" tariff ran from 6pm to 9pm, instead of from 5pm to 8pm for the past three weeks. This cost me two ways:

    1) Electricity generated by my solar PV system between 5pm and 6pm spun the meter backwards counting off-peak kWh instead of part-peak kWh.

    2) I use very little power from 5pm to 6pm (I'm generally not home from work), I definitely use more from 8pm to 9pm (I'm home, and it is dark so I have lights on). So moving the part-peak time an hour later meant that I bought more of the higher priced power than the cheaper off-peak power.

    -Tony

  33. Eliminate DST ... and Time Zones too by guanxi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Back in the day, when people's interactions were mostly local, time zones might have been harmless. But now, a large part of our population interacts across time zones every day. They're just a PITA -- time is an arbitrary number anyway, so who cares if the clock says 6pm or 6am when you wake up?

    It would take a little getting used to, but I bet everyone would adjust quickly and never go back. Imagine having every computer (and every log, timestamp, calendar, etc.) in the world on GMT. Imagine scheduling conference calls and not having someone confuse which time zone it was scheduled for.

    1. Re:Eliminate DST ... and Time Zones too by cpeterso · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Swatch Beats are the solution to time zones!

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time

    2. Re:Eliminate DST ... and Time Zones too by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Basically because you'd still have to do the calculations, but you'd lost the convenience of having the same frame of reference in all locales, as 1200 would cease to be relevant. It would probably just make things more difficult.

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22613 3&cid=18316935
      http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=158401 &cid=13272080

    3. Re:Eliminate DST ... and Time Zones too by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      time is an arbitrary number anyway, so who cares if the clock says 6pm or 6am when you wake up?

      I do care if a number contains alphabetical suffixes. If we rationalize on something like GMT, might as well use a proper 24-hour time.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    4. Re:Eliminate DST ... and Time Zones too by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Back in the day, when people's interactions were mostly local, time zones might have been harmless."

      That's funny. Standard time and the resulting time zones came about because there were more interactions on a national and even global scale, thanks to railroads, telegraphs and radio. Keeping the time difference between two points an integer number of hours is far more preferable to what preceded it: everybody using local mean time for their own meridian. Would you like to keep track of the ~12 minute time difference between New Orleans and Chicago? The ~16 minute difference between San Francisco and Los Angeles? The ~12 minute difference between New York and Boston?

      "They're just a PITA -- time is an arbitrary number anyway, so who cares if the clock says 6pm or 6am when you wake up?"

      We're a diurnal species. If mechanical time did not approximate solar time to some degree, the former would be abandoned for the latter.

      "Imagine having every computer (and every log, timestamp, calendar, etc.) in the world on GMT. Imagine scheduling conference calls and not having someone confuse which time zone it was scheduled for."

      Imagine a world where not everybody's job involves timestamps, computer logs, or conference calls. Or, instead of imagining, experience reality a little instead.

      At any rate, if it works so well, use your life as an example and set all your personal timepieces to UTC.

    5. Re:Eliminate DST ... and Time Zones too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except, if I'm doing business with somebody at a significantly different longitude from my own, I still need to know the difference. Sure, I can say let's schedule the conference call for 2100 GMT - conveniently 16:00 MDT for me. But my collegue in Amsterdam will be a bit annoyed. So I would need a look-up table to see what his work hours typically are - I wonder what we'd call it? I got it - Time Zones!

      Most people will keep their work days roughly corrosponding to daylight hours whereever they are. Time zones are just a convenient way to keep track of what those hours are from place to place.

    6. Re:Eliminate DST ... and Time Zones too by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Basically because you'd still have to do the calculations, but you'd lost the convenience of having the same frame of reference in all locales, as 1200 would cease to be relevant. It would probably just make things more difficult.

      You don't have to do any calculations. Why would you ever deal with two time zones? I presume because you are in one and talking to someone in another, or you are traveling from one to another. If you are talking to someone, you ask them what their hours of operation are, and call between them. No calculations needed. It's really quite convenient. Hours of operation are different for every company, and they have them posted on websites and such, again, no calculations ever needed. If you are traveling, you never need to worry about a dateline or such. You never need to worry about setting a watch. You never need to worry about calculations to figure out what time back home people are sleeping. You do one and only one calculation, "what time do I wake up in the morning?" and that's not a calculation, but an answer you get handed to you when you get off the plane or ask a local. If you have business meetings, they are given to you, no calculations. If you are hungry, you eat. You try to go to bed 8 hours before the time to wake up.

      One clock eliminates almost all calculations. It is by far the most convenient way of handling time (except for the fact that almost nobody does it).

    7. Re:Eliminate DST ... and Time Zones too by firewrought · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One clock eliminates almost all calculations. It is by far the most convenient way of handling time.
      Spoken like a true programmer! The "day"--the period of waking up, being active, going to sleep--is our one real biologically-rooted construct of time. You can't park midnight during the middle of lunch... the official calendar would not agree with people's conceptual calendars, and people would respond by developing new conventions that you'd then have to develop and re-gear your apps for and the calculations would be even messier and then you'd be back to square one.

      Eliminating DST alltogether now--that's a good idea.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    8. Re:Eliminate DST ... and Time Zones too by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't have to do any calculations. Why would you ever deal with two time zones?

      If you don't have to deal with multiple timezones then what the bloody hell do you care about what time it is in a different timezone?!?

      "what time do I wake up in the morning?" and that's not a calculation, but an answer you get handed to you when you get off the plane or ask a local.

      Nonsense. "The store closes at 5." "The store closes at 9." You know the former means "early evening" and the latter means "late evening" because we use time zones. Replace that with "The store closes at 0300," and suddenly you haven't a clue. Sure, you can figure out that local "noon" is 1800, therefore it closes at the equivelant of 9PM, but is that really easier?

      Yes, one of the side effects is that some locales border timezones and have to do a minor calculation to figure out what time the stores close in the adjacent timezone, but that wouldn't go away with everyone using UTC -- you'd still have to remember that it's an hour earlier/later.

      Don't get me wrong, DST is a ridiculous "solution," but discarding local time is equally ridiculous.

  34. DST all the time? by DebbieM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What if we just gave up standard time? Everyone likes the light. Few like the clock change hassle. Let's just stay in DST.

  35. Get up earlier. by Myria · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you life depends on the sun, get up earlier.

    The government's laws should be about encouraging businesses to set working hours to match the sun, not changing fundamental measurement systems to trick people into getting up earlier.

    --
    "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
  36. With "flex" time, this is senseless. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Companies used to mostly work 9-5 (or 8-5).

    Now, our company works from 7am to 7pm (9 hour shifts w/ hour lunches).

    Basically, if you get up early, you take a 7am shift- if you get up late, you take a 10am shift.

    I don't see why they can't leave the clocks alone and places will just shift their hours if it matters.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  37. Re:Who cares about energy savings by thestudio_bob · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, sounds like someone woke up on the wrong side of the day light saving time today.

    --
    The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
  38. end DST by mrtexe · · Score: 3, Informative
    A web site said it better than I could:

    STANDARDTIME.COM SAYS: If we are saving energy let's go year round with Daylight Savings Time. If we are not saving energy let's drop Daylight Savings Time!

    Enough of this daylight time, reset-the-clocks insanity. Just stop the madness.

  39. Change your schedule, not my clock by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you people have any clue what the concept of "noon" is supposed to be? In case you've forgotten, it's supposed to be the time of day when the sun is highest in the sky. It's supposed to be the time when there is as much daylight behind us as is in front of us.

    For practical purposes, this isn't exact, but we've done a pretty good job with splitting the world up into 24 time zones so that it's somewhat close.

    But not any more! No, now noon is just some arbitrary point during the day when we find it convenient to be. We want more time at the end of the day, so let's just move noon an hour ahead, right?

    WRONG! I have a better idea. Instead of dinking around with clocks and redefining what something means that has been around since the beginning of recorded time, why don't we just have businesses shift their hours around?

    Imagine how nice this would be. We never change our clocks. Twice a year, government changes its hours. The Post Office, for example, doesn't open at 8:00am during the summer, it opens at 7:00am, and it closes an hour earlier, too. Businesses that choose to do so follow suit and make sure its employees know when to show up. I suspect that almost all of them would, and probably most companies would have a policy that says something like, "When the government shifts its hours, we're shifting ours also."

    Everyone's happy. People get their extra hour at the end of the day. No one has to write stupid software patches to account for when DST is. Atlanta, Georgia is always GMT-5, never GMT-4 like it is now. People don't think Arizonans are weird because half the year they're on Mountain time and half the year they're on Pacific. If government wants to change its hours a few weeks earlier next year, there's no issue at all, they can just announce it a few months in advance, and when the time comes, do it.

    I'm sorry, but people who think that DST is a good thing are idiots. If you want to change your schedule, change your schedule. But leave my freakin' clock alone.

    1. Re:Change your schedule, not my clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That would be a bad idea for anyone who depends on public transportation. Suddenly a lot of people who takes the first train or bus in the morning can't get to work on time.
      No you have to either move everything back one hour or nothing, and then you end up with daylight saving time anyway except instead of a simple change of clocks, you have to change every scedule in the country.
      Anyway some advantages of DST are more suptle, I know that the tourism industry here in Denmark likes it because it extend the season for outdoors atractions a month, because its light for a longer time in the evening.

    2. Re:Change your schedule, not my clock by ryanov · · Score: 2, Informative

      Schedule change.

      Problem solved.

    3. Re:Change your schedule, not my clock by xzqx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You think this would save stupid software patches? Think again. Lots of industries need software to know when the workday starts. How about the stock market, for example? Your scheme wouldn't have saved any more headache than moving DST. In fact, it might have caused some headaches, because now companies would need proprietary software instead of relying on libraries (granted, that isn't always the easiest option either).

    4. Re:Change your schedule, not my clock by PasteEater · · Score: 3, Insightful

      why don't we just have businesses shift their hours around?

      Because it would be a much larger pain in the ass. So, some businesses follow government time, and some don't. Some shift their schedules, and some don't. How utterly ridiculous. Which option would your business take when half of the other businesses change their hours, and the others don't?

      DST is about simplicity: Ok everyone, change your clocks!

      The measurement of time is arbitrary in and of itself. By your rationale, we should adjust time daily so that noon is always the point in time when there is *exactly* half a day of sunlight left.

      I'm sorry, but people who think that DST is a good thing are idiots.

      Possibly, but anyone who endorses your plan doesn't exactly have both oars in the water either.

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    5. Re:Change your schedule, not my clock by TheDormouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow. I really don't think I could disagree with you more.

      Your world:
      1. Having to investigate when every business opens "this" time of the year. Since there's no standard, each business can decide when or if they want to change their schedule.
      2. Having to deal with public transportation schedules that may or may not change the same time that your place of business decides to change its schedule.
      3. Businesses having to maintain signage that says "Open 9am-11pm November-March, Open 8am-10pm April-October."
      4. Someone having to answer the phone constantly at your place of business asking "When are you open?" since they are less likely to memorize your business's flexible hours. (And don't think that an automated attendant that answers the phone with this information is going to prevent this question getting through to a human; it won't.)
      5. Getting to have noon magically when the sun is at the highest point in the sky. You know, if you happen to live on the meridian of your time zone where this actually occurs.

      Or the real world:
      1. Businesses keep reliable and memorizable hours.
      2. Public transportation schedules vacillate rarely.
      3. Businesses can keep their easy "Open 9am-11pm Every Day" signage.
      4. Still have to answer the phone at work explaining your hours, but probably to fewer people since your hours aren't confusing and are a tad easier to memorize.
      5. Noon is when it is. Doesn't matter since you can't reliably measure the time by looking at the sun most places in the world anyway.
      6. Throw around a frisbee an extra hour after work in the summer when the weather is nice.
      7. Change a dozen clocks and watches twice a year at a predetermined time that's widely publicized in the media, probably pre-marked on your calendar, and even changes automatically on machines with well-designed software.

      So, um, are all your clocks especially difficult to change or something? Or do you have like 40 thousand of them? Oh, you're a sysadmin who got bit by the DST change? Refer to the end of #7.

    6. Re:Change your schedule, not my clock by Phisbut · · Score: 3, Insightful
      We don't seem to be living in the same "real world". What you described is an ideal real-world, not the real-real-world.

      1
      GP's world: Having to investigate when every business opens "this" time of the year. Since there's no standard, each business can decide when or if they want to change their schedule.
      Your real world: Businesses keep reliable and memorizable hours.
      My real world: Even with DST, businesses have no global standard. Some open at 7am, some at 8am, some at 9am, some at 10am. Some stores close at 5pm, some at 6pm, some at 9pm. Some of them are even open 24 hours a day. Heck, stores in the same mall can have different hours.

      2
      GP's world: Having to deal with public transportation schedules that may or may not change the same time that your place of business decides to change its schedule.
      Your real world: Public transportation schedules vacillate rarely.
      My real world: Even with DST, fewer people work in the summer time. A lot of people are on vacation. Many public transportation schedules reflect this by having a different "summer schedule".

      3
      GP's world: Businesses having to maintain signage that says "Open 9am-11pm November-March, Open 8am-10pm April-October."
      Your real world: Businesses can keep their easy "Open 9am-11pm Every Day" signage.
      My real world: Even with DST, businesses already maintain signage that says "Open 10am-5pm Monday-Wednesday, Open 10am-9pm Thursday-Friday, Open 9am-5pm Saturday, Open 11am-5pm Sunday.

      4
      GP's world: Someone having to answer the phone constantly at your place of business asking "When are you open?" since they are less likely to memorize your business's flexible hours. (And don't think that an automated attendant that answers the phone with this information is going to prevent this question getting through to a human; it won't.)
      Your real world: Still have to answer the phone at work explaining your hours, but probably to fewer people since your hours aren't confusing and are a tad easier to memorize.
      My real world: (See 1 and 3)

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
  40. Not statistically significant by winkydink · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everybody knows that this was an unusually bright winter. I wonder why you never hear about the problem with Global Brightening?

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Not statistically significant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because the lightbulb cartels are suppressing the research.

  41. Congress member names by michaelmalak · · Score: 3, Informative
    The mass media seem to omit the names of the Congress members responsible for this fiasco. Here are the names from their own boastful press relese:
    • Fred Upton (R-MI)
    • Ed Markey (D-MA)
  42. Daylight Saving Mystery by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's right. The Sun burned up just as much fuel after daylight savings was introduced as it did before. Lawmakers are baffled.

  43. Re: by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It would be better to switch back. Why? Because there are unfixed errors in a lot of software that are still causing problems. For the fixed bugs, well, those can be "unfixed" if they were fixed in the first place. It isn't too late to switch back.

  44. Re:Don't foget about October.... (for the children by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, the widening of the DST period at its other endpoint, in October, was only done to make daylight trick-or-treating possible. Search the congressional record for it. They changed it by one week just to get Halloween in there. American candy makers had been lobbying for the change for decades.

    So stupid. I was never molested when trick-or-treating as a child because the predators couldn't see me in the dark.

  45. On the Flip Side by camperdave · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's six more weeks in the year when it will be light out when I (and a lot of the rest of you) go home from work.

    On the flip side, however, it means that there's six more weeks in the year when it is still dark when we go to work... the other side of the coin.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  46. Extrapolating from Chef Boyardee is not allowed. by Medievalist · · Score: 2, Funny

    You have to measure the savings by looking at the sales of candles, the same way Ben Franklin did.

    After all, if it was good enough for the Founding Fathers it's good enough for patriotic Americans, eh? Anybody that says otherwise is clearly a liberal who is soft on terrorism and hates America.

  47. Re:Who cares about energy savings by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Fine. You like more light. GET UP EARLIER. And leave my clock alone."

    No, you should get up later instead.

    "The clock reflects astronomical realities of earth/sun positioning."

    Nope, it reflects oscillations of a cesium atom. Far more regular and periodic than, say, the time between two consecutive noons.

    "Noon is supposed to mean the sun is overhead, mid-day."

    If I recall, there are only four days a year when local solar noon and local mean noon are the same thing, and neither have anything to do with standard time, unless you're standing on a meridian that's a multiple of 15.

    "Cocky people then decide they don't like that arrangement, and declare what _is_ shall be different from what they _want_ reality to be."

    If we're getting paid by the hour, we want our hours to be of a consistent length.

    "doesn't change the fact that it's really 5:00AM,"

    Is that standard time, local solar time or local mean time?

    "Seriously, man - it really messes up my internal clock. Midnight to six is my time to _sleep_; mess with that, and you're messing with my ability to function."

    Then maybe it's time for you to find a job that lets you sleep later.

    "You want more light? YOU get up earlier. Leave my clock alone; I'll be a lot more productive that way."

    No thanks, I prefer coming home before sunset.

  48. Re:This just in by 47Ronin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't see how this is saying Bush sucks. It blamed congress for the change in Daylight savings time, and last I checked, congress is run by the Democrats.

    BZZZZT! You lose. Maybe you should wind back the clock and note who was in control of Congress when this bill was signed. Can you guess which party had control of both the House and the Senate at the time?

    --
    Those who laugh at you for you having a Mac.. are the people who constantly call you to fix their PC.
  49. that's impractical, unfortunately by icefaerie · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, but it will remain that way for largely practical reasons. Having high schools let out earlier than elementary schools means that the older kids will be home to look after their younger siblings. The busing costs for school districts would skyrocket if all school levels ran simultaneously. The bus drivers first take the high school kids, then the middle school kids, then the elementary school kids. A school district would need a whole lot more buses running simultaneously to get everyone aged 5-18 to school at the same time. My high school and elementary/middle schools were actually two different districts, because I went to a regional high school. They had a bus-sharing scheme like this one worked out among all the districts.

    1. Re:that's impractical, unfortunately by krbvroc1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but it will remain that way for largely practical reasons I think you meant to say largely economic reasons. We are forcing people into an educational situation when their brain is not ready for it. Apparently the money is more important then the learning experience.
  50. Re:I like the extra daylight though by feepness · · Score: 4, Funny

    As many have said, I like the extra daylight. It would be nice if it saves energy, but the extra daylight is more important to me.

    Now if they would only legislate it so the sun didn't set at all.

    I do not get this. My wife makes the same sort of comments. I tell her to put the baby to bed at 9pm if it's still too light at 8pm and she says the baby will be cranky because she is staying up too late.

    I used to try to explain. Now I just nod.

  51. Re:It would mean REMOVING patches in Firmware by Technician · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This DST2007 thing has been a real pain in my ass.

    There is a lot of firmware that has not been patched or acknowledged due to low priority.

    I have a Linksys wireless router. Due to the difficulty getting kids offline to get ready for bed, I use the scheduler in the router to drop the connection. No nagging, begging for 5 minutes more 30 minutes later, etc.

    A week before the time change, I downloaded the latest firmware update and installed it.
    The changelog made no mention of the DST change so I checked the router Monday morning. It did not update. I have turned off DST in the router and changed the time zone one zone to the East to put it manualy into Daylight Savings. In the fall, I will have to remember to manualy move it back to the correct time zone.

    Un-patching this router is simply a matter of setting the time zone back and turning DST on.

    How much un-patched firmware is there?

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  52. Re:Amen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "I never understood school schedules."

    Then you haven't thought about it much.

    Early to bed, early to rise. School schedules reflected our agricultural heritage, which is often why summers are off, still.

    "It has been shown that teenagers naturally wake up later in the day, and that elementary school students wake up earlier."

    These are more recent studies, like in the last 10 years or so. Once schedules are set, things are hard to change, as there is a certain expectation.

    "Yet it is the elementary schools that start at 8:30 and the high schools that start at 7:30. Why not make school like work, where it runs 9-5, on a schedule more matching that of the parents?"

    Obviously you haven't worked a hard day in your life. 9-5 is more white collar. Blue collar traditionally was 7-3 for 1st shift. 2nd shift was 3-11pm. For example, where I am, the white collar rush time in the morning is heaviest at about 8:30am. However, most of my neighbors are out the door before 7, and the dump trucks start their banging 10 minutes after 7.

    "Some will counter that high school students have jobs in the evening, so let them start earlier. Why should jobs drive school schedules?"

    Your older student can take care of themselves if they arrive home around 2.5-3pm. The 2nd grader can be met at 3:15-3:30 by the parent that got off work. Or if the elementary school student has an older sibling, watched by them since the latter got home first. Or, without an older sibling, something that used to be done was that you hired a short watch babysitter, usually a high schooler. Most parents are concerned with what happens after school.

    A high schooler can drop off his elementary school sibling, or the white collar see the same off on the way to work. The blue collar with the elementary aged child usually had a stay at home wife, or she worked a more service or white collar job and could see the child off later.

    As well, most elementary school students usually don't have after school activities, like theater, marching band, or sports. This gives high school students who want to do those activities time to do them, and still make it home for the family dinner. If they started later, you wouldn't have a nice family meal, since they, as you were earlier quoting studies, are a good thing according to most studies.

    And yes, jobs do matter. A lot. High school usually lets out by 2:45. This allows high schoolers to hit the 2nd shift if blue collar (3-11), or the 2nd shift if they work in the service industry like fast food (depends, but usually 2.5-3.5pm to closing which is typically 9-10). Doesn't sound like a big deal to you, if mommy and daddy paid for your toys and food, but for a lot of on the edge students, if you can't have an afternoon job, they would drop out. At least this allows those interested in sports to partake, as well as those who need the jobs or the training to also get it while still in high school.

    btw, those sleep studies I don't think accurately accounted for natural light variances, in which case daylight savings actually works against how the teen mind would prefer.

  53. Ob. JonStewart by autophile · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm a lobbyist with the North American Automatically Time Changing Clock, Watch and Timepiece Manufacturers Association...

    ...or "TIMEBLA"...

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  54. Global brightening is real! by JurassicPizza · · Score: 4, Informative

    No joke -- all of the clean-air legislation has started to clear out decades worth of accumulated crud (aerosols) in the atmosphere. That results in more sunlight hitting the surface and intensifies the greenhouse effect. In fact, air pollution caused by the industrial processes that release greenhouse gases may have been limiting the warming impact of those greenhouse gases for a long time. Now that the air is getting clearer, the impact of those greenhouse gases may be exacerbated. This effect is also regional since different parts of the world have differing clean air standards.

    Here's the original article on this subject, from June 2006:

    http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~mann/shared/articles/Man nEmanuelEos06.pdf

    --
    --- JurassicPizza
  55. No it wasn't. by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You got exactly the same amount of light that you would have gotten anyway. You just think there was more because you didn't sleep in as late as you usually would have.

    Personally, I think anybody who needs the government to trick them into getting up early is a moron, but morons' opinions may differ...

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:No it wasn't. by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Personally, I think anybody who needs the government to trick them into getting up early is a moron, but morons' opinions may differ...


      Perhaps it's not so much needing the government to trick you into getting up earlier, as it is needing the government to trick your boss into opening your place of work an hour earlier.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:No it wasn't. by Orange+Crush · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You got exactly the same amount of light that you would have gotten anyway.

      Correct, but some of us get an extra daylight hour after work that otherwise would've been wasted while we're cooped up in a building.

  56. Re:Valid reason to know local noon.. by Technician · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you have a local magnetic anomility, setting a C-band dish can be difficult as a magnetic compass may get your polar mount off enough to cause tracking problems. A sunny day and knowledge of local noon makes finding true North/South very simple. It's the direction of the shadow of the plumb bob line at local noon.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  57. Throwing it out doesn't cost much at all. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Interesting

    alternatively...we can just get rid of DST altogether, since it has been shown to not do dick except annoy people and cost companies money in IT time.

    Getting rid of it altogether requires far less IT effort than moving it. Most systems can just be configured to run on standard rather than auto-daylight time. The rest you can just strip it out - much easier than putting it in or tweaking it every time the legislature gets another hive of bees in their bonnets.

    Staying with DST means a major ongoing hassle for any new scheduling application. Do you have any IDEA what a pain it is to program those with DST changes? *I* do: I had to do it for a client. What do you do with the 25 hour day - especially the hour that happens twice? What do you do with the 23 hour day?

    I hear the railroads handle it like this:
      - In the spring all the trains are suddenly an hour late, and try to make up the time over the next day.
      - In the fall they actually STOP them and let them SIT for an hour.

    I hear the worst day for commuter traffic deaths is the first Monday of DST. (It's rush hour with ALL the drivers jet-lagged simultaneously.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  58. Last Congress.... by The+Monster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It blamed congress for the change in Daylight savings time, and last I checked, congress is run by the Democrats.
    But it wasn't a year and a half ago when they passed the bill, and Bush signed it into law.

    People who oppose DST don't realize that it's just an attempt to recapture what people used to do automatically: Get up when the sun rises. The greater your latitude, the more variation there is in sunrise times between the solstices. We've settled on an hour as a good compromise that works for most people.

    --

    [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

  59. Re:Our patching is done as well. by ryanov · · Score: 4, Funny

    How many bullshit animated cursor exploits have I patched my Solaris machines for this year?

  60. Re:Saving Energy... by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is an incredibly biased piece.
    It will be ,at the very least, a year before they can glean an real facts about the change.
    2 years would be more worth while.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  61. Re:Get up early? No way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... completely ignoring the "functioning in society" bit.

    People who complain about the gubmint are often just complaining about having to deal with other people.

    Sure, if I never had to talk to anyone or do anything, I'd get up at dawn and go to bed at sunset too.

    But I'd also be living in a cave, and be dead by now.

  62. Re:This just in by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, the democrates have been in office for 4 months and just look at Iraq! republuicans never would have let that happen.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  63. It was mostly about peak shaving, I thought by rbrander · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I couldn't handle reading 300 posts, but I did search the whole topic for the word "peak" and nobody at 2+ used it. So here it is: we had a local news article in Calgary about the lack of change in TOTAL consumption,( just as many lights on in the AM as off in PM) but that it was good because it shaved the PEAK CONSUMPTION.

    People use the most energy right after they get home from work, basically; TV, computers (like me right now), cooking and other household operations.

    Removing added lighting needs AT THAT TIME reduces the maximum generating capacity you need available to meet the peak demand. Which means they build a new power plant for your area in 2014 instead of 2012, or whatever. The time-cost of money means real savings on your power bill - even at constant total kWh consumed.

    1. Re:It was mostly about peak shaving, I thought by Jtheletter · · Score: 3, Informative

      yes, so the peak instead travels to the early morning hours

      You're right that it travels to the earlier morning hours, but what travels is not the peak usage but the net difference in energy usage. So the evening hours are still peak use time - people are still going to use much more energy prepping dinner/watching evening tv/checking blogs than in the morning - but the morning peak has increased slightly. The afternoon/evening peak energy use is also usually reflected in the electricity prices, so it costs the consumer more per unit of energy in the afternoon and evening than it does in the early morning. So while there is not a net energy savings, there may be some cost savings. Granted, it will be miniscule to the average household energy consumer, but it is present. Unfortunately the way we tend to work in the US is if we have anything "extra" we decide it must be there to use, instead of save. And as others have stated, there is probably more of a cost in lost productivity because of the bi-annual clock change than a net savings of anything one would care to measure.
      Personally I've always been of the mind that after electric lighting went into widespread use it was time to do away with DST one way or another, I'd prefer to just set the clocks ahead 30 minutes one year to split the difference then never change them again.

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
  64. Re:Who cares, it was brighter! by Asphalt · · Score: 3, Funny

    If Daylight savings time is a good thing, then why not have it year-round?

  65. Re:Get up early? No way! by Cerberus7 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ah, but I need the government to trick my boss into thinking the time for me to come in to work has changed. That's how I get my extra daylight. :)

    --
    I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
  66. Arizona by bradray · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The rest of the world should follow Arizona's example. Don't touch your clocks. I grew up here in AZ, and for the life of me I can't understand why people want to mess with their clocks. If you want more daylight, get up earlier, or stay up later, whatever floats your boat. I'm usually a fan of the Founding Fathers, but Ben Franklin was off his rocker when he dreamed this one up.

  67. Took this opportunity to change our clocks to GMT by rwa2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Rather than bother with the patch, we simply took this opportunity as a sign that we ought to change our system clocks to GMT. Many benefits:

    * Systems that dual-boot windows and linux no longer make oopses with DST transitions

    * our company does more and more projects across different timezones across the country and internationally, and it gets real confusing real fast to have everything in Eastern, Pacific, Arizona (they don't observe DST), Melbourne, and the UK.

    * we're an aviation company, so most of us are already used to it

    * most of our computers are on closed networks anyway

    So Congress is really doing us a favor by driving us towards a global economy with a common accessible timebase already established for maritime and aviation uses. Even if that's not what they intended :P But Congress works in mysteerious ways... (we have to try to assume, because admitting they're dumb just sucks for everyone :P )

  68. Earthhour by defiant1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Something that may be of interest: In Sydney last weekend we all turned our lights out for an hour... check out http://earthhour.smh.com.au/index.php?option=com_c ontent&task=view&id=59 for the stats. According to Energy Australia, for the hour between 7.30pm and 8.30pm on 31 March 2007, there was a 10.2% reduction in electricity consumption across the Sydney CBD. This is calculated as follows: Sydney CBD temperature during Earth Hour was 19.8c. Typical energy consumption at this temperature between 7.30 and 8.30 is 228,180 KWh. Actual electricity consumption in the Sydney CBD at this time was 204,900 KWh. Energy Australia analysed data over 4 years to get the typical consumption on a Saturday night in the CBD during March and April. This takes into account daylight savings and weather. http://earthhour.smh.com.au/ for more info.

  69. Re:Who cares, it was brighter! by Seumas · · Score: 3, Funny

    We'd be missing an hour of time for the rest of human existence.

  70. Re:It wasted power on my end by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 2, Informative

    So why didnt you disable the "Windows Time" service? MS put a NTP client with a ntp.microsoft.com address. I'd rather have a NTP server of my own and it only pulling time off of a level 2 NTP server.

    That would make my server a NTP level 3 and my clients level 4. 4 Deviations of time off of nasa... Not too shabby.

    --
  71. Re:Our patching is done as well. by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 3, Informative

    Err.. telnet? In 2007? I think you need to go back to your cave.

  72. Re:Amen by porcupine8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Magically? No. But I think it would happen a lot sooner than most people would expect.

    I think that you vastly underestimate the power of institutional memory. Why do kids go to school September-May? Why, so they can go out and help with the crops in the summer, of course. Look at the amount of headway year-round schooling (go to school 2 months, off 3 weeks) has made - little to none! Even though many things point to it being superior in various ways. But damn it, kids get the summer off, that's how the world works. The original reasoning behind it has long been abandoned and forgotten.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  73. Re:But...but..[The obvious answer] by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is estimated that it cost US businesses about a Billion dollars to implement this DST change. If congress would have instead mandated a billion dollars worth of conservation efforts (such as more energy efficient lighting, better building insulation, etc.,) it would have saved 10 times the energy that the bill was supposed to save as conservation helps ALL the time, not just for an hour a day, 3 weeks of the year. It really doesn't take a whole lot of intelligence to figure this one out...

  74. Strictly about the money by penguinrenegade · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Someone did think of children - their own. Daylight savings time does not save energy, quite the contrary. One of the largest INCREASES is in gasoline consumption. The reason for the DST extension is simple - increase in shopping - hence those who own businesses & oil make more - and so do their children benefit.

    Add to the fray the changing from winter to summer mix (and back at the end of DST) and you have a recipe for charging more for oil. Anyone have gasoline over $3 a gallon where they are right now? And all this BEFORE the Iran conflict with England. The oil companies switch mixtures and "clean" their tanks in the process, every March and every fall. March prices rise through April due to "less supply" but the same demand. The reality is the gasoline goes through at the same rate. It's all supply/demand *on paper.*

    September brings Labor Day and "increased travel" for that holiday in the US, but prices CONTINUE to rise after that, due to switching the mix again. Add to that more shopping (more daylight DOES mean more shopping) and lo and behold it's all about the money. What else can we expect from a government that lets the President veto bills from the House and Senate because he wants to keep the Iraq war going, when less than 19% of the US supports the war? Definfitely fed up - but this move is STRICTLY over money.

  75. Re:Get up early? No way! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Ah, but I need the government to trick my boss into thinking the time for me to come in to work has changed. That's how I get my extra daylight. :)"

    One man's 'funny' is another man's 'insightful'. Every business I've worked at had its start/end times set to work with the start/end times of the businesses it worked with. You'd think reality would prevent somebody with mod points from +1'ing somebody for loudly proclaiming that DST doesn't actually cause more sunlight to hit this side of the planet.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)