Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Diebold Goes 0 For 3 In Massachusetts Case

Posted by kdawson on from the help-america-litigate-act dept.

beetle496 writes "ComputerWorld reports that last week a judge denied Diebold's request to block ES&S pact with Massachusetts. This is a follow-up to the earlier discussion here after Diebold contended that the state had erred in selecting the machines of its rival, citing accessibility provisions of the HAVA law. Quoting: 'Diebold's request for an injunction to block the execution of the contract with ES&S was rejected... The judge also denied Diebold's request to have an accelerated discovery process and to keep the state's legal team from viewing internal Diebold documents... "The suit is still there, but they went zero for three yesterday," the spokesman said.' The actual accessibility concerns have been discussed over at the TEITAC listserv, including a few telling observations from experts familiar with accessible voting and at least one state insider."

9 of 119 comments (clear)

  1. Diebold should just by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    stick to ATMs.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Diebold should just by Merusdraconis · · Score: 5, Funny

      I love how Diebold's argument is that their competitor's machine isn't accessible enough, like Diebold's are.

      We all know how easy it is to access a Diebold machine!

  2. Score.. by NightWulf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    one for the good guys. It's a start. Just amazes me how in some countries the mere thought of voter fraud creates giant revolutions, while in America you have blatant evidence of fraud, and very few people care.

    1. Re:Score.. by Volante3192 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I used to care. But I think voter apathy is contagious...

      Frankly, I think this country would be better off the sooner we start *really* fucking it up than later. Shock people into realizing their fragile little world is on the brink of becoming glass shards...

      If we just slowly slide downward, people won't notice...like now. It's like gently turning the heat up on a frog in a pot of water on the stove. Need to crank that oven dial to 11 and make froggy jump out and go "DAMN, THAT'S HOT"

    2. Re:Score.. by value_added · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I used to care. But I think voter apathy is contagious...

      Could be that the options aren't too exciting. There's never a CowboyNeal option, is there?

    3. Re:Score.. by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Frankly, I think this country would be better off the sooner we start *really* fucking it up than later. Shock people into realizing their fragile little world is on the brink of becoming glass shards...

      It's very easy to say that, sitting in your office or bedroom, comfortable with a cup of coffee and your browser pointed at Slashdot ...

      Revolutions are ugly, ugly things, and so are the circumstances that create them. Anyone who seriously wants things to get much worse, much faster, is either a psychotic, or just isn't thinking things through. (Usually the latter, of course.)

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  3. Obligatory by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, YOU defraud the Government!

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  4. Isn't it time for open source? by Toe,+The · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are several open source voting machine projects on SourceForge. WTF is our problem for not getting our governments to use the auditable machines?

    Or what about open source governance? Isn't it time to get rid of the institutions that are based on those of our pre-human ancestors? How about a little technology in our government?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source_governanc e
    http://www.metagovernment.org/

    We have everything we need.

  5. Same Sh*t, Different Flies by lagartoflojo · · Score: 5, Informative
    Are we supposed to be cheering because Diebold got rejected? From here:

    Thom Hartmann stated in CommonDreams.org (Nov 4 2004, [32]): "About two years ago [Jan 2003], I wrote a story for these pages, "If You Want To Win An Election, Just Control The Voting Machines," that exposed how Senator Chuck Hagel had, before stepping down and running for the U.S. Senate in Nebraska, been the head of the voting machine company (now ES&S) that had just computerized Nebraska's vote. The Washington Post (1/13/1997) said Hagel's "Senate victory against an incumbent Democratic governor was the major Republican upset in the November election." According to Bev Harris, Hagel won virtually every demographic group, including many largely black communities that had never before voted Republican. Hagel was the first Republican in 24 years to win a Senate seat in Nebraska, nearly all on unauditable machines he had just sold the state."
    As we would say here, ES&S is the same shit with different flies. Until the law changes, it doesn't matter if you vote on a Diebold machine or on an ES&S machine, you will still have not idea what really happened to your vote.