Slashdot Mirror


A Review of the Top Four External Hard Drives

Lucas123 writes "There's a really good, detailed review at the Computerworld site on the top four external hard drives with more than 500GB of capacity. The story reveals some big flaws in the external drives, like malfunctioning one-touch backup buttons, USB 2.0 ports that don't recognize the drives, and drives coming out of the boxes unformatted. It's also an eye opener with regard to actual backup speeds. 'Broadband connections, peer-to-peer networks and larger media files coupled with new regulations that require diligence in backing up files have clearly affected the external hard drive market as drive capacities expand to 1TB and beyond. Meanwhile, the prices of those drives continue to drop, making them ever more attractive, particularly with the ease of deployment -- literally a two-minute installation, and you're ready to go. We put four of the leading external hard drives to the test. Our criteria were simple: The drives had to have multiple connection technologies (USB 2.0 plus FireWire 400 or FireWire 800 or both), include backup software and have a capacity of at least 500GB.'"

18 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. TFA: one page, less advertising by choongiri · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:TFA: one page, less advertising by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now why did you go ahead and do that? Lucas123 was just trying to use a Slashdot Submission to drive traffic to his site in the hopes he could get some additional advertising revenue. It's not like he's Roland Piquapalle.......Oh, wait. Never mind.

  2. Why wasn't the LaCie rated higher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've never heard of this brand, and for the price and all of the tests it spanked the pants off of all the rest of the drives.. I see he didn't like the quirks but it smoked the rest of them.

    1. Re:Why wasn't the LaCie rated higher? by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lacie has been around in the Mac world for a long time, which may explain the nice Firewire performance. It may also explain why it "wasn't formatted"... I'm speculating, but it is conceivable that it was Mac-formatted. Or not. I'm not sure who would back up to a drive without first doing a format anyway, if only to check for integrity.

      Regarding the inoperable button, which is their main complaint about the drive, I'm surprised that they didn't contact Lacie support and report back... it's conceivable that it is a know issue or a bum unit. Then again, I'm rarely impressed by the reporting at Computerworld.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Why wasn't the LaCie rated higher? by IvyKing · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lacie has been around in the Mac world for a long time, which may explain the nice Firewire performance. It may also explain why it "wasn't formatted"... I'm speculating, but it is conceivable that it was Mac-formatted.


      The docs that came with the LaCie BigDisk bought by a co-worker specifically stated that it was formatted for the Mac as Mac's were the most common computers with a FW800 interface. My co-worker had no trouble re-formatting the drive for ext3 using the FW400 interface (fastest external interface on a two or so year old e-machines AMD64 laptop - we tested the interface using my LaCie). The drive has not given any troubles despite being subject to bouncing while running, powerdowns while running and other not so gentle treatment.


      While FAT32 does have the advantage that just about anything can read/write to it, the 4GB file size limitation (which dates back to Seattle Computer Products' QDOS original FAT implementation) really limits its usefulness for large drives. SOP for me is to re-format FAT drives with the most appropriate file system: UFS for Solaris (fun part was figuring out that I needed to use svcadm to kill vold) or NTFS for Windows XP.


      I wasn't impressed by the review either.

  3. Why not just do it yourself? by Coopjust · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not just do it yourself? All you have to do is buy an enclosure and a drive...

    -It's cheaper to buy the two separately.
    -You get to pick your drive case (color, features, etc.)
    -You get to pick your drive (WD, Maxtor, Seagate).
    -While OEM drives often come with more than a year warranty (SG is 5 years, I believe WD is three), regular external drives often come with a one year warranty.

    While you do lose a few features (I'm dying for a good enclosure w/ one button backup), it's cheaper and you have more selection. Plus, the software that comes with external hard drives is such crap anyways (Seagate and BounceBack Crippled/Express Edition).

    Of course, as a slashdotter, I may not be representative of the average computer user (OK, I'm not).

    1. Re:Why not just do it yourself? by Hokie06 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why use a one button backup when it's pretty trivial to write a shell script that'll do an Rsync backup?
      Trivial to many slashdotters? Yes. Trivial to the average user? No.
      Average user's response. What's a shell script? What the hell is rsync?
      --
      Kilroy was here.
    2. Re:Why not just do it yourself? by sconeu · · Score: 3, Informative

      Still I wish windows had good support for EXT2.

      Not the best, but Explore2FS is pretty nice.

      Of course, writing a Windows File System is a black art. If MS documented it better, maybe there'd be more third party file systems.

      You might want to look at this as well -- disclaimer, I haven't tried it, don't know how good it is.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  4. Western Digital Passport? My Book "Essential"? by MiceHead · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've purchased a few WD Passports (they're up to 160GB now), and while they seem to be meant more for personal "sync up your stuff!" use, they're not bad for backups. In their favor are the facts that they're powered by USB (you can just plug one in and go, sans supply) and that they're relatively small. The tradeoff is the modest capacity (I really like that we can call 160,000 megabytes "modest" -- simple pleasures for a simple mind, I suppose) and the price-for-storage (they're much more expensive per gig than the WD My Books).

    TFA reviews the My Book Pro, but they also have a USB-only My Book "Essential" (read: Cheaper!) version; anyone tried those?
    ____________________________________
    Dejobaan Games, LLC - Because we love developing games.
    Indie Superstar - Because we love webcasting about indie games.

  5. Cheaper than $135? by justthinkit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cheaper than $135 for a 500GB USB 2 drive? That is how much my Maxtor One Touch III 500GB USB2 drive cost. And by the way, why wasn't Maxtor included in this lineup? Even though it was bought up, it still produces a different (and apparently cheaper) product.

    --
    I come here for the love
    1. Re:Cheaper than $135? by Paul+Carver · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's a great price, but Newegg currently has that exact drive (Maxtor One Touch III 500GB) for $155. Amazon doesn't seem to have it but they have a 300GB version for $170 and a 600GB version for $417. www.maxtorstore.com is also selling the 300GB version for $170.

      So, if you managed to get a deal buying it for $20 less than the already low price at Newegg then good for you, but don't pretend that that's the common going rate for external hard drives.

  6. Valid reasons for not preformatting. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, if it's designed for a Mac, it's possible that it's not formatted on purpose: first, because it's trivial to format a drive when you connect it up the first time (plug drive in, dialog comes up saying that it's not formatted, would you like to format it, click yes ... etc.), and also because there are a few filesystems that people might want.

    Apple's Disk Utility offers six options to format a disk into: Mac OS Extended (HFS+), Mac OS Extended (HFS+) Journaled, Mac OS Extended (HFS+) Case-Sensitive, Mac OS Extended (HFS+) Case-Sensitive Journaled, MS-DOS File System (FAT32), UNIX File System (EXT2?).

    I guess I would assume that a "high end" HW manufacturer like Lacie would pre-format the drives to Mac OS Extended Journaled, because that's what Apple recommends as a default these days, but particularly if it's a product that's being aimed at non-clueless users, they might have just decided it wasn't worth it.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  7. Firewire still beat out USB by pammon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The most interesting aspect of the review is that Firewire outperformed USB for every drive in every aspect of the testing. I guess some things don't change.

    1. Re:Firewire still beat out USB by metamatic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For every superior piece of technology, there's an inferior one that's far more popular.

      For Mac OS X, there's Windows.
      For Firefire, there's USB.
      For PostgreSQL, there's MySQL.
      For Ruby|Python, there's Perl.
      For Rails|Java, there's PHP.
      And so on.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  8. Re:What the shit is this? by UncleTogie · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmmm, that's not going to work for me then, I use bear bottles, thus my setup is incompatible with this blinking light of which you speak.
    Incompatibilities aside, I've got to ask: How the heck do you manage to bottle a bear?
    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  9. Re:What the shit is this? by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Funny

    Very carefully?

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  10. What about power use and noise ?? by Qwavel · · Score: 4, Insightful


    As usual, endless details on speed, and next to nothing about noise levels, power usage, and whether they have the ability to spin down when not in use.

  11. Beware of connected storage devices... by rmdyer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Before you commit to your shiny new USB/Firewire storage device, be sure you test it thoroughly. I've had several devices for whatever reason fail file checksum tests over multi-gigabytes of data. The most likely culprit is the USB interface and the drivers for them. Copy a very large multi-gigabyte tree of files back and fourth several times, checking against the master file checksums (MD5, etc). Also remember, proper checksum'ing requires that you eliminate any cache'ing that the OS may be doing, so unplug the device, then plug it back in, before running the checksum. Checksum'ing is especially important if you've formatted NTFS and the device is USB powered.

    Also, even if you've verified the data is good on your storage device, moving it to another machine and connecting it up may leave you unhappy if the storage interface on the new machine isn't working properly.

    You have been warned.