New Ubuntu Project Code Named 'Gutsy Gibbon'

Go2Linux writes "The code name for the new Ubuntu project that is going to be release this October is Gutsy Gibbon, It was introduced by Mark Shuttleworth, early today, this release will come full composite as default, according to Mark."

Comments

Why not link directly to the story?

[Simon80]

Here's the actual mailing list posting: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-ann ounce/2007-April/000276.html

Re:Why not link directly to the story?

[Adhemar]

The ex-Ximian part of Novell consistently used/uses monkeys and monkey-related project names (Bonobo, Mono, Evolution, etc). I wonder if there is, consciencely or unconsciencely, some message to the Novell folks: the monkey-named version is after all going to be the first version with an official Gnewsense-like flavour:

The Glossy Gnu will nonetheless play a role in this next release, because Ubuntu 7.10 will feature a new flavour - as yet unnamed - which takes an ultra-orthodox view of licensing: no firmware, drivers, imagery, sounds, applications, or other content which do not include full source materials and come with full rights of modification, remixing and redistribution. There should be no more conservative home, for those who demand a super-strict interpretation of the "free" in free software. This work will be done in collaboration with the folks behind Gnewsense.

I know I'm probably looking way too deep into something as playful as a name choice. The thought just occured.

Re:Why not link directly to the story?

[Corwn of Amber]

Okay. I hope I'll find the USABLE .iso when it will come out, the one that Just Works, OOTB, Zero Conf', includes the nVidia driver, mp3 player (MAD, please, lest I burn mine ears), support for all video formats in all the players, configured right - that is, no "-vo not valid" in mplayer or "can't load wmdmod.dll" in xine.

The day when Ubuntu will be THAT easy then it will be ready for the desktop.

Re:Why not link directly to the story?

[Aix]

Just so you know, neither the gibbon nor the bonobo is actually a monkey. They are apes.

Re:Why not link directly to the story?

[miscz]

You can try Linux Mint, Ubuntu-based non-free distro.

Re:Why not link directly to the story?

[freeweed]

And they're all primates. Maybe the next Ubuntu will be code-named "Happy Human"? :)

wtf is composite?

[SharpFang]

I tried to RTFA but no info, and Google won't be much of help with a common word like that.

Re:wtf is composite?

[BlackPignouf]

Try Compiz(http://compiz.org/), Beryl(http://beryl-project.org/), compositing manager (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compositing_manager) or compositing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compositing)!

Re:wtf is composite?

[complete loony]

Using the 3D capabilities of your graphics card to render your desktop.

Re:wtf is composite?

[choongiri]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compiz

Re:wtf is composite?

[robthebob]

Have a google for Beryl/Compiz. That'll get you on the right track.

Re:wtf is composite?

[LarsWestergren]

If you like me have been confused about stuff like DRI, Mesa, GLX Extensions and so on in logs and conf files when trying to get OpenGL drivers working under Linux, I recommend How Xgl works.

Re:wtf is composite?

[Eivind]

The quick explanation (somewhat oversimplified, but you get the idea)

In a traditional (non-compositing) windowing-environment, each application essentially handles its own part of the screen, when, for example, a part of firefox previously hidden behind an xterm get unobscured, firefox is informed of this fact, and is responsible for redrawing that part of its own window.

In a compositing system, instead each program draw on their own private separate area. All these areas are then sent to the compositing manager which makes the overall screen by combining these in various ways.

There's advantages. First, it simplifies things for the programs, since they can pretend they're always alone on the screen. Secondly, it makes it possible to unify visual tricks. Without composition, for example, each and every program that wants to support stuff like being transparent, or animating their appearance, or being transparent only while being dragged or any other of a million visible tricks need to implement this independent of eachother.

With composition, the compositing window-manager can handle all of that, and the programs won't even notice. So it improves consistency by making the same visual options work identically in *all* programs.

Re:wtf is composite?

[cyclop]

I use Beryl (SVN version!) on my main desktop every day. I used to be skeptic like you, but after trying it, I'd never go back.

Wobbly windows are pure useless eye candy, but transparency (colour-specific transparency is in development,I think), expose-like and wall plugins are really useful. Rain and wobbly are just technology showcases -I think that we'll see useful applications of Beryl/Compiz soon.

Re:wtf is composite?

[mgiuca]

The real key here (with composite) is the sparkle for the masses. The people who see "The Wow Starts Now" ads for Vista and go, "ooh Vista's beautiful". Composite desktops in Linux are a "we've got the wow too!" I think it's very important to avoid being seen as the ugly duckling.

In this regard, wobbly windows serve their purpose ;)

I'm a big fan of Canonical's business model

[Andrew Tanenbaum]

which seems to be "Spend Mark Shuttleworth's Money". I'm sure we're all enjoying the free (as in beer, if I must) ride.

We should start voting on the next release's name

[aldeng]

I vote for Horny Hedgehog. Or Horny Hyrax. Anything Horny, really.

Desktop Linux Done Right

[aarmenaa]

I recently installed 6.10 (Edgy Eft) on my laptop, and I'm fairly surprised. The only things that didn't work right from the start were the digitizer (it's a tablet PC), and my USB wireless dongle. The digitizer isn't plug-and-play or anything like that, but the USB dongle is more of a mystery - it's claims Linux support, and it's even detected, but the included driver appears to be broken. The driver the manufacturer provides doesn't support anything in the standard manner (as far as WPA and various encryption stuff goes), so I'm using ndiswrapper for it right now. It works, but still won't work in encrypted modes. It uses a Ralink RT73 chipset, btw.

But hey, it got the old internal wireless card perfectly. It only supports WEP though. It also got the video card (and I can change resolutions in an applet!), sound card, USB hubs, my external USB DVD-RW (and it hotplugs!), and so on. It'll even hotplug the USB wireless dongle, with ndiswrapper - I full expected that to not work. So we're not getting 100% success, but it's entirely possible that you could install Linux and never touch a config file. That's how you do desktop.

Honestly, my biggest complaint now is that WPA and connecting to weird RADIUS servers run by universities and the like is still a royal pain. I tried Network-Manager (a Gnome applet) and it did all kinds of bad stuff to my system (loopback never came up), and didn't help me connect to encrypted networks at all. But, they're working on it. If this is the worst complaint I can muster, we've come a long way.

So Vista can be renamed Greedy Gorilla?

[jkrise]

Just so we compare apples to apples... considering the bloated h/w needs for Vista, and considering it comes form the 800lb gorilla.. Greedy Gorilla sounds very 'apt'.

I think Vista articles on Slashdot must come with a Greedy Gorilla icon... given that we're seeing several articles a week already.

Re:We should start voting on the next release's na

[Gleng]

What about "Rutting Rhino"?

Re:cue first, post complaining, about commas,

[Anonymous Coward]

Ubuntu seems cool, however I will be waiting for the Don Imus sponsored version: Nappy Nigger.

Also, when is the Crazy Cracker release going to be out? That one should be cool as it will be based around KKKde.

My friends...

[Psychotria]

... already think I am crazy. Think of the uproar when I tell them I playing with the gusty gibbon.

Gutsy Gibbon?

[alexo]

Sources indicated that, in accordance with the theme, the next project will be named Busty Baboon.

Re:cue first, post complaining, about commas,

[jojoba_oil]

Nappy Nigger [...] Crazy Cracker
And the release that'll get them both excited (despite their differences) just so happens to be: Busty Bimbo.

Splog

[Bogtha]

It was introduced by Mark Shuttleworth, early today, this release will come full composite as default, according to Mark."

How on earth do you get that, when what he actually said was:

On a personal note, the monkey on my back has been composite-by-default, which I had hoped would happen in Edgy, then Feisty. I'm nervous to predict it now for Gutsy, for fear of a third strike, but I'm told that great work is being done in the Compiz/Beryl community and upstream in X. There's a reasonable chance that Gutsy will deliver where those others have not.

Wow, Go2Linux really did well with this. They copy & pasted the email and the release schedule, they added a totally incorrect summary, submitted their own story to Slashdot, and got onto the front page. It's almost as if Slashdot is trying to reward incompetence.

Re:We should start voting on the next release's na

[Jearil]

Hungry Hippo.

Of course if they'd take 3 word names, Hungry Hungry Hippo will work too.

Get their shit together first

[RockoTDF]

Sometimes I wish Linux developers would drop the whole "new release every X months" model and start putting more effort into the individual versions. Case in point? Edgy Eft and sound. Lots of people are having a really hard time getting Creative sound cards to work, and the main solution requires compiling your own drivers (which is acceptable in Linux but not if it is to be mainstream) and possilby reinstalling Gnome or KDE. I know it isn't the developers responsibility to write drivers, but why is it ok for them to overlook the most common sound card brand, especially when it worked flawlessly in 6.06? Maybe if they weren't working on 45 future versions of their product at once they could get things to work properly for Gods sake.

did the OP even read the article?

[Lamalex]

composite by default? Mark Shuttleworth never said that. He actually said he doesn't want to because it hasn't worked out twice already. The more I read slashdot the more I realize how dumb [almost] everyone here really is.