Slashdot Mirror


Canadian DMCA Coming This Spring

An anonymous reader writes "The Canadian government is reportedly ready to introduce copyright reform legislation this spring, provided that no election is called. The new bill would move Canada far closer to the U.S. on copyright, with DMCA-style anti-circumvention legislation that prohibits circumvention of DRM systems and bans software and mod chips that can be used to circumvent such systems."

153 comments

  1. the answer is clear... by feepcreature · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...call an election!

    --
    Paul "Say no to feeping creaturism"
    1. Re:the answer is clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...please! please! please! ...

      Of course, if we do and the (neo)Conservatives win a majority, we'll have just stamped our own tour-bus-ticket-to-hell...

      -AC

    2. Re:the answer is clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're fooling yourself if you don't think that the Canadian Liberal party (had to disambiguate from the American political slur of the same name) wouldn't give you the exact same bill if they were HRM's ruling party. All of these scumbag lawyer plutocrats are in bed with their lawyer lobbyist friends; the scumbags in Washington, D.C. just got a head start and their tactics are now starting to migrate North.

    3. Re:the answer is clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The trouble with calling an election is that as much as people want the conservatives out of power, we're also comfortable with the minority government, because they simply can't actually follow up on their platform, or do anything rash, as the opposition will, in that event, call a vote of non-confidence, thus toppling the minority government, and send us back to the polls.

      However, the opposition isn't ready to go back to the polls, as the liberal party is still in shambles, and Stephane Dion has yet to prove his competence as a leader. The Bloc Quebecois can't hope to pull of a repeat of 1994 and ed up as the official opposition, unless there is a clear majority; given the state of the liberals, it would have to be a conservative majority, and nobody (save the prairies, Canada's equivalent of the bible belt) wants to see that. The NDP is still between 4 and 8 years away from realistically making the elections look like a three-horse race, and the Greens/Communists/Marxist-Leninists, well, they barely even count as political parties.

      Politics is a delicate situation in Canada. Its not as easy as voting no-confidence, not as long as there is still the threat of the conservatives goes in as a majority. We're still rather sore from Mulroney's stint as prime minister. And frankly, many are waiting for Harper to fuck up like Mulroney did, before toppling the government. (For those not familiar with Canadian politics, the conservative party imploded after Mulroney's time in power, falling from a clear majority to, if I recall correctly, not even managing a double-digit seat-count in the next elections).

      Frankly the DMCA doesn't scare me even remotely as much as the thought of a conservative majority does, considering the later not only sold out our lumber industry, send troops to Afghanistan against the people's wishes, seeks to abolish our beloved gun registry, and seeks to semi-privatize our beloved public healthcare, but to add insult to injury has so much as stated that they'd even so much as consider repealing the charter of rights, to force through a ban on same-sex marriage, if they had to... Given the choice between dealing with the DMCA, or giving up my civil rights, I'll take the DMCA, thanks. And I kindly ask that anyone who places greater importance on copyright than on civil rights, to kindly get the fuck out of my country. Thanks.

      Screw calling an election, fear of the DMCA doesn't justify the risk of 4 years of aconservative majority. Petition the Governor General to veto the bill if it goes through senate, instead. Its a little known fact of Canadian politics: Provincial PM -> Lieutenant Governor General -> Prime Minister -> Senate -> Prime Minister -> Governor General -> Prime Minister -> Queen Elizabeth II.

      (Yeah, its a tad complicated: our senate is an appointed one, although it can reject bills the government can pass, the prime minister can simply flood the senate with new senators to force a majority vote (see Mulroney's stunt with passing the GST), but the governor General, being the representative of the Queen, can overrule the senate, but the Prime mister can challenge the GG's ruling, calling for his or her resignation, and finally in such as situation, the true head of state, the queen, can either side with the Prime Minister, or the governor general. Although there is precedent for the lieutenant governor general to overrule the provincial PM, and there is precedent for the Governor General to overrule the ruling Prime Minister, as far as I can tell, there has never bee a case in which the queen has been invoked directly, though our constitution does grant the ruling monarch, as constitutional head of state, the final word in all political affairs).

    4. Re:the answer is clear... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'seeks to abolish our beloved gun registry'

      Opposing registries (of guns or anything else) doesn't really mesh with claiming civil rights advocacy.

    5. Re:the answer is clear... by mrmcwn · · Score: 1

      I think ACTRA/UDA/SOCAN and the various other artists' unions are slightly more entrenched (and vocal) in the political machine than the people who actually consume the media. Not to mention the big software manufacturers with big luxury boxes at the Corel Centre (or whatever it is called these days) in Ottawa. The chances of this passing increase with every round the Sens progress in the playoffs...

      Someone should point out how much the feds collect in GST on the media levy (a tax on a tax...beautiful) to help them make their decision.

    6. Re:the answer is clear... by Trails · · Score: 1

      the conservative party imploded after Mulroney's time in power, falling from a clear majority to, if I recall correctly, not even managing a double-digit seat-count in the next elections
      They ended up with 2 seats. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_conservat ive#History
    7. Re:the answer is clear... by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      and if i remember correctly there has been a canadian artist union against the dmca for years. weather its these union's official policies, or the high profile artists from this union, i cant remember, but they made a huge stink about C60 in the main strem press the last time it came up.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    8. Re:the answer is clear... by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      Corel Centre (or whatever it is called these days)

      It's now called "Scotia Bank Place".
      Mmmmm, nice warm fuzzy feeling there.
    9. Re:the answer is clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fucking liberal scum... must be from ontario or quebec.

      The sooner Alberta can separate and quit paying for the priveledge of being screwed by ottawa the better.

    10. Re:the answer is clear... by DrMindWarp · · Score: 1


      Ever hear of the TRIPS agreement? Every country that signed it is obliged to implement DMCA-type legislation. That was in 1996 and it's a done deal folks. If you want to fix it, you'll have to get your country to pull out of the agreement.

    11. Re:the answer is clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. It was a colossal waste of money. We already have decent gun control in our country. The gun registry was ridiculous. If I want to knock someone off would I use a registered gun?

    12. Re:the answer is clear... by grimr · · Score: 2, Informative

      "beloved gun registry" Huh? All of the people I know think it's a waste of money. 2 billion dollars to make people 'feel' safe? First of all, the criminals won't register their guns. And second, I just read in todays paper which quoted a cop saying the police were told not to use it as it contained stale data. Beloved my ass...

    13. Re:the answer is clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it not Paul Martin's LIBERAL government that started sending troops to Afganistan?

      http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2004/07/25/canada_a fghanistan040725.html

    14. Re:the answer is clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NDP is still between 4 and 8 years away from realistically making the elections look like a three-horse race I think you forgot to add a zero to the end of each of those figures.
    15. Re:the answer is clear... by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      Organized criminals and black market aside, most guns used in murders followed by suicide are registered.

      I am also among those who believe the registry is completely pointless... or at the very least not worth more than 1% of what it has cost so far. This is far worse than the sponsorship thing.

    16. Re:the answer is clear... by kilrogg · · Score: 4, Informative
      The Liberals have had similar legislation in the works for at least the past 6 years, there's no doubt that a DCMA-style law will eventually pass in parliament, its only a matter of time. As for the rest of your random partisan attacks:

      considering the later not only sold out our lumber industry,

      The provinces and lumber industry agreed to the deal, they agreed it was a good compromise. (and besides, with the export tax, this means more money going to the governments and therefore less tax that us taxpayers need to pay. As well, there is possibly now less pressure to clear-cut our beautiful forests to satisfy American demand).

      send troops to Afghanistan against the people's wishes

      The Liberal's sent them there, and the majority of parliament agreed to extend it by 2 years.

      seeks to abolish our beloved gun registry

      The registry is a waste of money. I've yet to hear of a case where the registry saved a life, yet many cases continue to occur with registered guns despite the registry (Dawson shooting being a high profile example). Let's spend that 2 billion on policing and prevention instead.

      and seeks to semi-privatize our beloved public healthcare

      Now your just making stuff up. The conservatives have continuously expressed support for healthcare, including the recent wait-time guarantee initiative (although not perfect, its at least a step in the right direction).

      but to add insult to injury has so much as stated that they'd even so much as consider repealing the charter of rights

      What are you talking about here? They've talked about strengthening it by adding property rights to the charter.

      to force through a ban on same-sex marriage

      They had an open vote on it, it didn't pass, case closed. (and incidentally, it was supported by a small number of liberals and opposed by some conservatives).

    17. Re:the answer is clear... by multisync · · Score: 0

      If I want to knock someone off would I use a registered gun?


      It's hard to say. People kill each other in the heat of passion, and don't necessarily think their actions through. One thing in favour of the Gun Registry is it gives law enforcement the heads up when responding to a domestic dispute that there may be a gun on the premises.

      People use the "if we outlaw guns only outlaws will have guns" argument all the time, but let me throw another cliche out there: if you're doing nothing wrong, you've got nothing to hide. Or, if you're using your gun for hunting and keeping the coyotes away from your chickens, why not register it? I know, it's nobody's damn business, it's more bureaucracy, it's a pain in the ass ... But I register my vehicle, I register to vote, I "register" with Revenue Canada when I take a job, I am obliged to take part in the census ...

      As far as privacy goes, keeping the fact that I own a gun secret is pretty low on the list.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    18. Re:the answer is clear... by shaitand · · Score: 2, Insightful

      'if we outlaw guns only outlaws will have guns'

      This is both accurate and logical.

      'if you're doing nothing wrong, you've got nothing to hide'

      This is neither accurate nor logical. A desire for privacy does NOT imply guilt, it is a fundamental need shared by most forms of life.

      'Or, if you're using your gun for hunting and keeping the coyotes away from your chickens, why not register it? I know, it's nobody's damn business, it's more bureaucracy, it's a pain in the ass ... But I register my vehicle, I register to vote, I "register" with Revenue Canada when I take a job, I am obliged to take part in the census ...'

      Because I don't want the government to have information about me. I am opposed to all of those things. The less intelligence about me that government possesses the less harm they can do in my life. Registering your vehicle serves one purpose, allowing the government to track you. I can not see how that could EVER actually benefit me. Should I commit a traffic offense that would be quit helpful to the government in collecting revenues but it would never benefit me. If I am concerned about my vehicle being stolen then I'll call lojack.

      It wasn't that long ago that none of those controls existed and somehow society functioned.

      'As far as privacy goes, keeping the fact that I own a gun secret is pretty low on the list.'

      My guns are for the protection of myself and my family. Perhaps you trust the powers at be and the police to be honest.. because you have faith. Perhaps you believe in flying spaghetti monsters as well. Maybe you think not trusting the police and government is paranoid. That's fine, you are entitled to your beliefs. I am just as entitled to mine. And my beliefs include those groups in the list of people who might try to use force to impose their will on me and my family. Why would I tell someone who may present a threat to my family that I have a gun? That intelligence could only help them.

    19. Re:the answer is clear... by Redlazer · · Score: 1
      Good god i hope so.

      Conservatives (the extremists, which is almost all of them unfortunatley) are a scary bunch, but they are absolutely nothing compared to the New Democratic Party - i recall hearing some of their stances, and getting the feeling that it was one of those "Oh, by the way, its all the Jews fault. Yeah... we should start killing them. Then, everything will be better."

      They are terrifyingly socialst/communist, to the point where we would be taxed to hell (more than we are now), and would probably lose most of our freedoms.

      -Red

      Im gonna get it for that Jew comment, arent it?

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
    20. Re:the answer is clear... by Runagate+Rampant · · Score: 1

      so that was a double-bit seat count :)

    21. Re:the answer is clear... by pipatron · · Score: 1

      Why would I tell someone who may present a threat to my family that I have a gun?

      To make sure they pick someone else, that does not have a gun.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    22. Re:the answer is clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you're fooling yourself if you think you know anything about the Canadian political system or its culture.

      Liberal Party of Canada / Parti Libéral du Canada. Not "Canadian Liberal party".

      "HRM ruling party". What's that supposed to be? The Brits use "HM" ("Her Majesty's") in front of things like government. In Canada, that's so rare, it's not easy to think up an example, and most of the time would be elided anyway. ("The Official Opposition" rather than "HM Loyal Opposition" is standard now).

      The "ruling party" is the government. In Canadian legislatures (indeed, the Westminster system in genral), "ruling party" is an almost unknown term. We would use "government" or "governing party" (a bit more rare) or in the Senate of Canada, "government supporters".

      So: "You're fooling yourself if you don't think that the Liberal Party of Canada ... wouldn't propose the exact same bill if they were the government". Well, nearly everyone knows that. Indeed, TFA itself points out the similarity between this bill and C-60, a bill which was proposed when the Liberals were the (minority) government. Technical bills of this nature are usually prepared by bureaucrats within the appropriate Ministry, and nobody really expects the Minister responsible to fully understand what she or he is doing. Geist should know this, so it's odd that he suggests that the Liberals have a vested interest in C-60, particularly since the party has new and pretty different leadership from when it was last in government.

      Given that the bill hasn't even been given first reading yet (i.e., it hasn't been published!) and the relatively full legislative programme in the present session, and the Senate's tendency to insist on reviewing technical legislation in its own time, there is little urgency with respect to this proposal.

      Jumping early with apocalyptic predictions is a hallmark of Geist in his blog. I think he's pretty sharp and his predictions aren't entirely outlandish, however the progress of legislation in the Parliament of Canada is very slow for bills like this when there is a fragile minority government in the House of Commons that cannot rely upon the cooperation of a majority of Senators to speed things along without amendment.

    23. Re:the answer is clear... by Curtman · · Score: 1

      The NDP is still between 4 and 8 years away from realistically making the elections look like a three-horse race

      Realistically? The best the NDP has ever done is 43 seats in 1988. What makes you think the NDP will get anywhere in 4 to 8 years?

      I say we should cancel the NDP. It isn't a party if nobody shows up.
    24. Re:the answer is clear... by Curtman · · Score: 1

      send troops to Afghanistan against the people's wishes

      That was the Liberals, and they were obliged to by NATO.
    25. Re:the answer is clear... by Duve · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the mission itself completely changed during Haper's time in office at the urging of General Richard J. Hillier. From a mission of state infrastructure rebuilding to that of direct counter-insurgence. General Rick for the most part as be playing hero for a few things that Harper has pushed to through Parliament to maintain the mission while increasing military funding at the same time, while the military itself seems dogged enough with trying to contain the chaos within Afganistan and losing. In a odd manner, it's a rather personal 'Iraq' for the our country.

  2. I am skeptical by 5,+Troll · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Two things: In the current political climate, such a bill would not get much traction as there is a minority government who desperately wants to become a majority next election. Bills such as the one described don't get you votes as it doesn't benefit the majority of voters.

    Second, it's my understanding that the current state of copyright in Canada is that it is not the form in which a copyrighted work is held (ie DVD, CD, mp3, avi), but the manner in which it is used. So, you can have a zillion mp3s for personal use, but you cannot use them in a publication, or broadcast them without the express consent of the copyright holders.

    In my mind, it would be very hard to change current law in such a way so as to preserve the status quo, such as libraries.

    Plus, they already tax removable media to compensate the rights-holders of all major video and audio media(while screwing independants... which is another topic for another day), so you'd think that they would either have to remove that levy, or all people to continue doing what they are doing.

    --
    Please mod me only (+) Underrated or (-) Troll
    1. Re:I am skeptical by optimus2861 · · Score: 1

      Bills such as the one described don't get you votes as it doesn't benefit the majority of voters.

      They also don't cost you votes because it's not an issue that's going to fire up the general voting public. Our next election is shaping up to be fought around Canada's mission to Afghanistan, and the environment. Health care will make its usual sound-and-fury, signifying-nothing appearance, Quebec will get talked about, law and order will get talked about, the Liberals will bray on about how "neo-conservative" and "Bush-like" the Conservatives are, the Conservatives will bring up past Liberal scandals, and the NDP will be saying "a pox on both their houses" -- copyright changes will be way, way down the list.

    2. Re:I am skeptical by starfishsystems · · Score: 1
      I'm glad to see these points being made early in the discussion. First, the existing legislation was formulated in consideration of fair use. It seems to me that those terms of reference have not materially changed. Unless this legislation is to be revoked, it will remain in force. Second, the existing media levy already compensates copyright holders. No doubt this legislation was not developed in a vacuum, but at the request of interested parties. In other words, the right to fair use of those copies has already been paid for.

      As Michael Geist points out, if copyright reform is indeed being proposed by the Conservatives, it will not be received with acclaim but with public hostility, and rightly so.

      --
      Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
    3. Re:I am skeptical by ubergamer1337 · · Score: 1

      Plus, they already tax removable media to compensate the rights-holders of all major video and audio media(while screwing independants... which is another topic for another day) You must be new here!
    4. Re:I am skeptical by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Our next election is shaping up to be fought around Canada's mission to Afghanistan, and the environment

      Lets get back to Marijuana decriminalization. That was a fun one.
    5. Re:I am skeptical by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Bills such as the one described don't get you votes as it doesn't benefit the majority of voters.

      No, it will only get them millions of $$ in campaign donations, movie industry sponsored political fundraisers, and kickbacks. It will also appease the U.S. film industry, which now shoots the majority of its TV shows and movies in Canada using Canadian film crews and adds millions (if not billions) into the local economy.

      But yes, I'm sure the the noble politicians of Canada will ignore all that and just do the right thing.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. Slash-olympics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ""The Canadian government is reportedly ready to introduce copyright reform legislation this spring, provided that no election is called. The new bill would move Canada far closer to the U.S. on copyright [CC] [MD] [GC], with DMCA-style anti-circumvention legislation that prohibits circumvention of DRM systems and bans software and mod chips that can be used to circumvent such systems.""

    On your marks! Get set! Complain!

    1. Re:Slash-olympics. by compro01 · · Score: 1

      more like

      "On your marks! Get set! Mail letters!"

      my MP and Harper are gonna be getting a sack or two of mail from me and the various people i know.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re: Slash-olympics. by Dolda2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you implying that this is something which should not naturally be complained about unless one follows Slashdot groupthink?

    3. Re: Slash-olympics. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'Are you implying that this is something which should not naturally be complained about unless one follows Slashdot groupthink?'

      Hey, I'm first in line to complain but even I have to admit I have never heard of someone outside of Slashdot complaining about the DMCA.

    4. Re: Slash-olympics. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      then youre living in the wrong areas, or not educating the people around you.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    5. Re: Slash-olympics. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'then youre living in the wrong areas'

      Maybe. I've lived in Central IL without a peep and now in Miami.

      'or not educating the people around you'

      I wouldn't really count the people I talk to about it. They are hearing it from me. I'm talking about the ignorant masses.

    6. Re:Slash-olympics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, does that software like a debugger would be banned? Good luck with that.

  4. Not "coming" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful


    It's not "coming" as the summary suggests, it's only a bill being put forward.

    1. Re:Not "coming" by OECD · · Score: 1
      It's not "coming" as the summary suggests, it's only a bill being put forward.

      It's still one step closer than it was. Yes, there's time to stop it before it arrives, but right now it is approaching.

      --
      One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    2. Re:Not "coming" by Butisol · · Score: 0

      Even Anonymous Cowards are getting sick of the misleading/alarmist article summaries on /. Seriously. Accurate headlines and summaries PLEASE. ...As long as I can still get my free mp3s and pr0n...

    3. Re:Not "coming" by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Oh please. It's not like this bill will inevitably become law if people don't speak up. Hell, given the current minority government in place, I think it exceedingly *un*likely that we'll see this bill get anywhere in parliament.

    4. Re:Not "coming" by Evilest+Doer · · Score: 1

      It's not "coming" as the summary suggests, it's only a bill being put forward.
      So, basically, it is only being stroked. Full orgasm is not yet forthcoming.
      --
      I feel like death on a soda cracker.
    5. Re:Not "coming" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming? It's not even breathing hard! (mandatory Real Genius quote)

    6. Re:Not "coming" by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      It's not "coming" as the summary suggests, it's only a bill being put forward.

      Just like in a horror movie: "Death is coming". Obviously, it's not certain you will be killed when he reaches your house, but Micheal Myers/Jason/whomever is approaching.
  5. Finally by Shky · · Score: 4, Funny

    No wonder the rest of the world thinks we're a bunch of backwards hicks up here in our igloos. We don't even have the DMCA yet. This should do a lot to remedy our image. Finally some forward thinking going on up here!

    --
    CC Licensed Serialized Story and Podcast: Ingenioustries
    1. Re:Finally by blueadept1 · · Score: 1

      Hey Bill, can I borrow your sled team to get to the barber's within the next fortnight? My beard is getting mighty long.

  6. Good luck with that by jasonmicron · · Score: 3, Funny

    I bet it will work as amazingly as it has in the US!

  7. Kneejerk reaction (IMO) by zappepcs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just a kneejerk reaction to the rumor about Internet radio stations moving to Canada since the CRB decided to price them out of business.

    If I were Canadian, I wouldn't worry so much about DMCA as I would the US pushing hard enough that the Canadian government rolls over on measures that protect their own music and film industries. Hollywood has been losing business to Canadian industry for years now.

    The DMCA would just be one measure to strong arm the entire continent into a position of propping up the **AA at any cost to the consumer.

    1. Re:Kneejerk reaction (IMO) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hollywood has been loosing business to the lowest bidders over the last few years, and that means Mexico and the former Eastern Bloc countries. We get our share of films that are considered non-bankable for their projected budgets, 95 percent of which are crap anyway and rarely successful.

      And if Canada has been getting lots of Hollywoods productions, I'd have a lot less time to read Slashdot!

    2. Re:Kneejerk reaction (IMO) by Caffeinate · · Score: 1

      Not only is the Canadian film industry doing well, Stargate is filmed here!

      Just in case you couldn't tell - the first two seasons consist entirely of them going to planets that look like backwoods BC.

      --
      Godless heathen.
    3. Re:Kneejerk reaction (IMO) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed! That petty anti-Americanism that so many Canadians confuse with national pride might finally be put to some good use!

  8. Re:revolt in the streets by CogDissident · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just remember a valuable lesson from our dear departed Mr John Candy, all vulgar spraypaint must be in BOTH english and french.

  9. Where will we threaten to move to now? by Lethyos · · Score: 1

    Will we head for the Pole? Or do we keep going “up” into Russia? My mind boggles at all the Slashdot clichés that might come of this.

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:Where will we threaten to move to now? by Markus_UW · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, you screw the RIAA.

    2. Re:Where will we threaten to move to now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Will we head for the Pole? Or do we keep going "up" into Russia? My mind boggles at all the Slashdot clichés that might come of this.

      Apparently, Norway is the go-to place when Canada fails.

      Pity. I recently got a chance to move back to Canada. Having to deal with a Canadianized DMCA isn't a deal-breaker, but it does take a bit of the shine off the deal. Oh well, much like when I left - if Canada can't make itself attractive to IT professionals, we'll just pay our taxes elsewhere.

  10. Joomla -- Hah! That figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The link to the site is bad... looks to be a joomla site - that figures.
    A number of my clients have serious security problems witn Joomla. Does
    anyone have a mirror? The site is already hosed.

  11. If the Pigopolists don't get their way this time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you can bet your britches they'll keep coming back until they do.

  12. Re:revolt in the streets by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Better yet, do what I did and move the hell out. Do you have any idea what the weather is like in Costa Rica and Panama this time of year? :P

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  13. Maybe we should just hang the politicians who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    suggest this sort of thing for treason for being beholden to interest groups instead of serving the people.

    Americans should also have a few hangings too. Politicians the world over have gotten too comfortable in their own skin and are willing to forsake their responsibilities because the worst they expect is to be not elected again - boohoo - with a fat pension to boot. Only the ones that have a healthy fear of the people would respect the people's power.

    It should be their duty, actually, seeing as how they send/force all the crappy ideas up here to us.

    1. Re:Maybe we should just hang the politicians who by Caffeinate · · Score: 1

      I presume you just watched V For Vendetta?

      --
      Godless heathen.
  14. Fantastic by Wolvie+MkM · · Score: 1

    Thank you Bev Oda! Like I needed another reason not to vote for the CPC...

    --
    I Like Pie...
    1. Re:Fantastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you should be thanking her political sponsors...
       
      All of her probosals should come with a "Brought to you by the friendly gentlemen of the RIAA/MPAA" disclaimer.

    2. Re:Fantastic by despisethesun · · Score: 1

      In Canada, it's the CRIA (Canadian Recording Industry Association) and the CMPDA (Canadian Motion Picture Distributors Association). Basically the same bunch of assholes, though.

      --
      This poo is cold.
  15. Reply on previous version by Locklin · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I emailed my MP about the previous version of this bill, and this was his response:

    Dear Mr. Locklin,

    Thank you for your letter regarding Copyright Reform.

    I supported C-60 I would do so again if a similar Bill is reintroduced in the House of Commons. Bill C-60 only made it to the First Reading stage and subsequently fell off the Orders for debate.

    With any amendment that is put forth to a Government Bill, whether through the debate stage or committee stage, it must be balanced in such a way that it doesn't make the legislation appear to be too ambiguous. I as a Member of Parliament I would need to see the how Digital Rights Management (DRM) component of any new legislation would affect not only the industry but also the consumer and whether individual privacy rights would be affected?

    There has yet to be any new Copyright legislation to come before the House of Commons in this session. I will note your concerns if it eventually does.

    Sincerely,

    Hon. Andrew Telegdi, P.C., M.P.
    Kitchener-Waterloo
    --
    "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    1. Re:Reply on previous version by jeevesbond · · Score: 1

      Nice one, I live in Kitchener/Waterloo too. Good to see the local MP is receptive. Also have a look at this comment on how to take action. Basically, letters are the best medium, and the best people to send them to are the 'critics' who will hopefully set the honourable Bev 'Corporate Sponsorship' Oda on fire.

      --
      I'm going to transform myself into a mighty hawk. Either that or I'll just go and work at Dixons, haven't decided yet.
    2. Re:Reply on previous version by Benlaron · · Score: 1

      Any chance on posting the email you sent so us lazy^H^H^H^Hbusy folk can forward it off to our MPs?

    3. Re:Reply on previous version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I mailed my MP (Sue Barnes, London West) a couple months ago. She wrote back promptly. I include her response for your edification:

      Dear Mr. Anonymous Coward,

      Thank you for your letter expressing your opinion regarding Bill C-60, An Act to amend the Copyright Act. It is important to gain public opinion on the important debates that influence the direction of our country, which is why I appreciate you taking the time to inform me of your views.

      Let me assure you that I take all of your concerns very seriously. We liberals had expected the Conservative government would have tabled amendments to the current Copyright legislation last fall, which they did not. As the Official Opposition, we are hoping that the government move towards striking a fair balance between strengthening the rights for copyright holders and maintaining the rights of users and consumers.

      Rest assured I will convey your concerns to colleagues, but should you wish to share you (sic) views in more detail, I suggest you contact Tina Keeper, Official Opposition Critic for Canadian Heritage. Her mailing address is as follows: Room 712 Confederation Building, House of Commons, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6.

      Once again, I would like to thank you for taking the time to convey your thoughts on this important issue.

      Yours sincerely,

      Honourable Sue Barnes, P.C., M.P.
      London West

      It's a little underwhelming, but it could be worse :P

    4. Re:Reply on previous version by jeevesbond · · Score: 1

      Did you write to Tina Keeper as well? Now would be a good time to write to her about this. :)

      --
      I'm going to transform myself into a mighty hawk. Either that or I'll just go and work at Dixons, haven't decided yet.
    5. Re:Reply on previous version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is completely off-topic -- but how did someone as functionally illiterate as Andrew Telegdi ever come to be elected to parliament?

      Oh, I get it ... he's PC (think Stockwell Day).

    6. Re:Reply on previous version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Receptive?

      He said he voted for it before, and he will vote for it again.

      Everything in that letter beyond the first line was filler.

  16. pay double by chris_7d0h · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, judging by other countries it's likely they will retain the levy and still make it illegal to copy stuff.
    Taking Sweden as an example, there they tax all storage media (not just "removable" media) with this levy. Actually it's not really a tax (taxing illegal activities is illegal itself), but a state protected fee which a private organization is allowed to collect and without insight into how, distribute parts of the sum to a secret list of copyright holders.

    So I guess you have to look forward to being coerced by your government into paying levies (which should exempt you by covering any IP loss right?) and then be put behind bars. It's a hypocrisy, but hey at least it isn't the first in the law book.

    --
    In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
    1. Re:pay double by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Taking Sweden as an example, there they tax all storage media (not just "removable" media) with this levy. Actually it's not really a tax (taxing illegal activities is illegal itself), but a state protected fee which a private organization is allowed to collect and without insight into how, distribute parts of the sum to a secret list of copyright holders.

      canada has a similar law, although it only applies to removable media such as blank cds. now, normally i like the levy, since it helps keep the copyright rottweilers at bay, but consider this...

      i'm in this rock band. we are, as one local journalist stated, "startlingly unsuccessful". so, we record and release a compact disc. it's a run of 500 and we sell, maybe, ten (thanks mom!) and lose a tonne of money. this is not an unusual scenario.

      but the kicker is this: we pay the levy on the blank cd's we use for our release. this means that some major-label canadian artist (ms. levign perhaps) is actually making money off of my band's record while my band is losing money.

      amazing stuff.

    2. Re:pay double by gobbo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      i'm in this rock band. we are, as one local journalist stated, "startlingly unsuccessful". so, we record and release a compact disc. it's a run of 500 and we sell, maybe, ten (thanks mom!) and lose a tonne of money. this is not an unusual scenario.
      but the kicker is this: we pay the levy on the blank cd's we use for our release. this means that some major-label canadian artist (ms. levign perhaps) is actually making money off of my band's record while my band is losing money.

      Well, all you have to do is join the American Federation of Musicians, then apply to the Canadian Private Copying Collective for a zero-rating on the levy.

      That should save you $105 on your purchase of 500 blanks (yes, $0.21 on ea.!!), and after the $60 application fee for the zero-rating and the $112.00 annual AFM dues plus the $115 initiation fee, you'll have saved -$182 ...oh.

      I was archiving field recordings on blank media, and paying a levy. At some point, I just broke down and started downloading mp3's so that I didn't feel so ripped off.

    3. Re:pay double by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Yep the Canadian music industry is just as ass-backwards as the RIAA, we just don't have as lawsuit-happy a country (yet). What's worse is that most of the "benefits" offered by the AFM are either overbooked or unavailable in most areas. You'll get greater "benefits" by buying a few rounds at the local indie club and chatting it up with the real talent, not the office-dwelling cocksuckers who ruin the industry.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    4. Re:pay double by multisync · · Score: 1

      i'm in this rock band [telus.net]. we are, as one local journalist stated, "startlingly unsuccessful". so, we record and release a compact disc. it's a run of 500 and we sell, maybe, ten (thanks mom!) and lose a tonne of money. this is not an unusual scenario.

      but the kicker is this: we pay the levy on the blank cd's we use for our release. this means that some major-label canadian artist (ms. levign perhaps) is actually making money off of my band's record while my band is losing money.


      Thanks for an insightful post. I've made the same argument here in the past, but the "I just wanna download songs to my heart's content" crowd think the levy is a good deal for them. Meanwhile, people who use blank media for purposes other than burning songs they didn't pay for on to CDs (I still can't believe people bother to do this) get screwed.

      Thank you again for giving us a real world example of why the "levy" is idiotic.
      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    5. Re:pay double by Nick+Kirven · · Score: 1

      You could just apply for Zero Rating exemption as provided by the same laws that implement the levy.

      Being in the music industry automatically qualifies you to purchase your media levy-exempt.

      --
      - nk
    6. Re:pay double by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

      AFM is against filesharing, no? That would be like joining the RIAA, or what?

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    7. Re:pay double by gobbo · · Score: 1

      AFM is against filesharing, no? That would be like joining the RIAA, or what?

      Right, it just gets more and more twisted.

  17. Speaking of laws... by toriver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... what happened to charging the music industry's Big Four for cartel activities, or the movie industry over the DVD regions dividing the market into convenient zones (also cartel-like), despite WTO goals of free markets?

    Oh, that's right. They paid off the politicans. Is the lobster to your taste, Mr. Hatch?

    1. Re:Speaking of laws... by isaac · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's right. They paid off the politicans. Is the lobster to your taste, Mr. Hatch?

      Orrin Hatch isn't just some bought-off Senator - he's also a successful recording artist!

      http://www.hatchmusic.com/

      So you see, Senator Hatch has a rather personal stake in copyright law. I mean, if his works weren't protected by civil and criminal law unto 70 years after his death, he'd have no incentive to create anything.

      -Isaac
      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    2. Re:Speaking of laws... by Ajehals · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your post had me in fits of laughter until I realised I'd mis read it - I read

      So you see, Senator Hatch has a rather personal stake in copyright law. I mean, if his works weren't protected by civil and criminal law unto 70 years after his death, he'd have no incentive to create anything.

      as:

      So you see, Senator Hatch has a rather personal stake in copyright law. I mean, if his works weren't protected by civil and criminal law unto 70 years after his death, he'd have no incentive in dying.

  18. Odds are... by Bullfish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An election will be called within the next month or two, after that, it all depends on who gets into office, but I think it foolish to think that another other party in power would not be pressured by the various lobbies to do their bidding. And all political parties love the money that comes with lobbies.

    1. Re:Odds are... by ubercam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Regarding the money from the political lobbies, it would be maximum $5,000 each. The previous Liberal government passed a law preventing limitless campaign donations. Probably one of the smarter pieces of legislation in the past decade...

    2. Re:Odds are... by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      You mean in the last 30 years. René Lévesque passed this law in the 80s if I recall correctly.

    3. Re:Odds are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no. Rene Levesque was provincial. The liberals passed it federally.

  19. indeed, haven they been trying for 6 years? by plasmacutter · · Score: 3, Informative

    for the past 6 years ive been hearing nothing but rumors about how certain elements (puppets) in the canadian government have been trying to "harmonize" canadian copyright with the US, and every time theyve tried they've met with ever stiffening resistance from very vocal and powerful anti-dmca groups, from a powerful coalition of canadian artists to the canadian papers and the public at large.

    I expect to see such a bill die a public, horrible death. If it does not, however, i'll look forward to the business many developing nations will see as the modchip makers and circumvention tool developers jump ship.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  20. Re:rip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, at least we all know where the next National Rifle Association meeting will be held! "From my cold, dead hands!" etc.

  21. Re:revolt in the streets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too hot?

  22. Michael Geist wrote an essay on this.... by 8127972 · · Score: 4, Informative

    .... topic and why it's a bad idea here:

    http://www.caut.ca/en/bulletin/issues/2004_nov/com m_copyrightreform.asp

    Highly recommended reading for Canadians who wish to see why the House Of Commons should bury this idea today.

    For those of you who don't know who Michael Geist is, check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Geist for more info.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  23. Re:Odds are... (election could alter DCMA) by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Informative

    An election will be called within the next month or two, after that, it all depends on who gets into office

    A friend of mine who was the current Secretary of the 43rd District Democrats in Seattle has gone up there to help with the elections, so she at least thinks it's fairly certain.

    But I'm not sure I agree with your statement on all political parties loving the money that comes with lobbies - IMHO this does not normally include either the NDP or the Green Party in Canada.

    But what do I know, I used to be active in BC politics ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  24. GOOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sick of the freeloading leeches that are constantly pirating stuff and I hope this leads to more of this freeloading scum getting put behind bars.
    PAY YOUR WAY.

    1. Re:GOOD by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

      You like when your MP considers you guilty until you're proven innocent?

    2. Re:GOOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sick of the freeloading leeches that are constantly pirating stuff and I hope this leads to more of this freeloading scum getting put behind bars.
      PAY YOUR WAY. I'm tired of no-talent jerk-offs who can't make it as live performers demanding people pay for their 10th rate garbage because its easier than working for a living.

      GET A JOB!
  25. Re:revolt in the streets by Butisol · · Score: 0

    It's a very tempting idea on the grounds of climate alone. I for one would gladly leave Soviet Canuckistan and welcome my new drug lord leaders.

  26. We're having this battle in New Zealand now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And one argument that has earned a lot of traction here goes like this:
      - DRMs (TPMs, in the jargon) may *in theory* be used to protect artists'/publishers' rights, but in practice they are far more often used to grant publishers new rights, far beyond what the law allows. For example: the copyright holder *has no right*, under law, to say when and how you're allowed to access the media that you've lawfully purchased. Yet this is the "right" that TPMs are most commonly used to "enforce".
      - Therefore, TPMs are used by publishers unilaterally to rewrite their own rights. If it's illegal to circumvent anything calling itself a TPM, then all other "rights" granted to consumers are worthless.
      - So the million-dollar question is this: "Who do you think should be responsible for defining publishers' rights in respect of copyright material? Publishers themselves, or democratically answerable politicians?"

    Good luck.

    1. Re:We're having this battle in New Zealand now... by Pofy · · Score: 1

      So, how does the proposed new law in Canada define "DRM" and what types of DRM does it cover? Similary for New Zeeland? Sure, if they just say DRM in general, it basically ends up to cover anything someone decides to call DRM, it adds new rights in effect. However, I would guess there is SOME definition of it. The US DMCA for example seems to list what type of actions the protection should be fore and it is basically the exact same ones as is listed as being exclusive to the copyright holder (with exceptions of course) PLUS access. Thus in effect making access a new right for the copyright holder if they add some sort of DRM to controll access.

      In Sweden, when we implemented the EU directive, it was made sure that only protection that was relevant from a copyright perspective, that is, prevented actions the copyright holder had control over, basically copying and making it available to the public was covered. DRM that regulated other things, such as region coding was NOT covered and circumvention is thus not forbidded. Accessing a work is similary not a right of the copyright holder, hence protection that deals with accessing a work (for example to look, read and otherwise use) is not covered and can be circumvented. In addition, protection that combine covered and not covered types of protection is not covered either to prevent a loophole.

  27. Offtopic, I know, but... by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1
    Hollywood has been losing business to Canadian industry for years now.

    No, Hollywood (and its stockholders) has been doing quite well (or not quite so badly, depending on your point of view and your tax status), thanks largely to lower filming costs in Canada. It's the people who used to work on films when they were done in the US that have lost out on the deal...

  28. Re:revolt in the streets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Canadians already pay a premium on blank recordable media, that's good enough IMHO, and I hope you'll dump the tea into the harbor and tell the RIAA to go fuck themselves.

  29. Write your MP by dubstar · · Score: 1

    The lobbying efforts of these various content industries are going to continue regardless of which party is in power. Take the time to write your MP, and CC each of the major political parties as well:

    http://www.conservative.ca/EN/1045/
    http://www.liberal.ca/contact_e.aspx
    http://www.ndp.ca/contact
    http://www.green.ca/en/contact

    Make it known that Canadians will not support any government pandering to the one-sided arguments of content publishers. DRM is doomed to failure and propping it up with legislation is just another step towards criminalizing fair-use.

    1. Re:Write your MP by Trails · · Score: 1

      As mentioned in an earlier post, should also probably contact Tina Keeper, Official Opposition Critic for Canadian Heritage. Her mailing address is as follows: Room 712 Confederation Building, House of Commons, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6.

  30. Re:revolt in the streets by fishybell · · Score: 1
    Boomer: The capital Toronto.

    Mountie: No, the capital of Canada is Ottawa.

    Boomer: Yeah, right. Do we look that stupid? Ottawa!

    --
    ><));>
  31. Time for an election by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought a judge already put the smackdown on DMCA in Canada, on the basis that children as young as the age of 12 should not be held accountable for downloading music from the Internet. (sorry no source - but I remember a slashdot headline on it).

    So much for Stephen Harper not acting as if he has a majority... But if polls can be trusted, he can win the next election with a majority. :(

    - People like tax cuts, but don't understand what the taxes were being spent on.
    - People like S.H.'s stance against crime, but jail time and harsher/minimum sentences don't prevent crime
    - Stephane Dion is disorganized and "looks" weak (read timid) in comparison to S.H.
    - S.H. is flip-flop on climate change is just a way to please voters (by promising action) and businesses (weak implementation of climate change)

    BTW if you think I'm left wing you're only half right. I'm old left not new left.

  32. Too bad by ^_^x · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For as long as I pay a levy on any recordable media, I will continue to download what I like. If they'd like to challenge me in court, I look forward to asking what exactly I paid that tax for whenever I buy a spool of CDs, DVDs, etc. Royalties for nothing? Government trying to profit from illegal activity?

    And I will continue to apply hacks wherever needed to get around designed weaknesses/inabilities/stupidity. For example, I have a hard disk in my PS2 - I need a modchip to load games off this disk. I load all of my store-bought games onto this disk because if I keep using the PS2's DVD drive, it will almost certainly fail within a few years. I used to use a "digital video stabilizer" to strip Macrovision scrambling off of DVDs so I could watch them - the only way between my player and TV was through my VCR (it converted co-ax to composite) and the Macrovision messed with my VCR, so I removed it. I pity the fool who tries to charge me for something like this.

    1. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      While I agree with your sentiments, as a lawyer I can tell you that you are the one who will have serious problems if they decide to take action against you. Simply defending the case would probably bankrupt you, regardless of whether you were to win or loose. Getting a costs award is never a sure thing, so even if you win you can still be on the hook for all of your legal expenses. This is why it is important to fight against these laws. Anyone who thinks that they can simply ignore laws that they deem "stupid" is taking a huge risk. While you may think that you can explain your use in court, you likely do not have sufficient funds to hire a competent lawyer who will even get you that far.

    2. Re:Too bad by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      You're a competent lawyer and you can't spell the word, "lose"? Mind you, I just inferred that you are competent. And actually a lawyer.

    3. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I pity the fool who tries to charge me

      Mr Baracus is that you?

    4. Re:Too bad by ^_^x · · Score: 1

      That's Mr. T, foo'!

      To the other AC, I actually do import - I play a lot of Beatmania, and the only one that ever came out here was 9 years late and bad. Also, with the DMS4 modchip I don't have to boot the HDLoader disc (which doesn't seem to be sold anywhere anyway) - when I press the power button, HDLoader just comes up booting off the hard drive.

      To the other other AC, I know it's a reckless and legally questionable stance, but I think even if I lost I'd raise enough valid points and bring enough attention to the issue to make it worthwhile. The odds are incredibly tiny that I would ever appear in court for downloading copywritten material, especially since most of it lies outside North American jurisdiction, but regardless it's something to think about and prepare for before it happens.

      Haha, this discussion is days old - no one will read this anyway...

  33. Re:revolt in the streets by Trails · · Score: 1

    The US doesn't export tea. Maybe we should dump 24 DVD's into the harbour? I got your DMCA right here, Jack Bauer!!!

  34. Hurry! Time's a wasting! by dukieduke · · Score: 1

    Download all the Anne Murray and Rita MacNeil you can! You may not be able to soon!

    1. Re:Hurry! Time's a wasting! by Caffeinate · · Score: 1

      Also classic Fred Penner and Sharon, Lois & Bram tunes!

      Where would we be as a nation without "Skinamarinky-dinky-dink"?(sp?)

      --
      Godless heathen.
  35. I have but 1 word by Coraon · · Score: 1

    DAMNIT!!! >. bloody hell, see this is why I voted the green party. Well they better call an election before this goes up...because if they do then the bill will die and not come back. This is something that happens alot in canadian politics, they put a bill forward just before an election that they know wont fly so that the special intrest group got the attention they wanted but dont have to deal with actually doing it. That better be what there doing anyway...because if not (shakes fist)

    --
    -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
  36. and what use is that? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    seriously, if you like to experience your culture enough to care about it being free from corporate restrictions, why on earth would you move to a place with completely foreign languages and customs?

    that throws out the baby with the bathwater a lot worse than sticking around and adopting civil disobedience.

    how do you retain exposure to your culture when everyone spews spanish!

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:and what use is that? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      how do you retain exposure to your culture when everyone spews spanish!

            Perhaps because due to a fortunate quirk of nature, you were brought up in several different countries and cultures and are able to break the "village" mindset 99.998% of the world's population lives with. HINT: everyone in the world thinks their country/culture is the best. If you actually live outside your country for a while you get to open your eyes and see the REAL world around you.

            But I guess learning a 3rd or 4th language is beyond most people. Stay in Canada and pay your stupid income tax, and enjoy your 30 below winters. Me - I don't pay income tax, I live like a king and hey, if I really miss Canada (NOT) I can always fly there for a few weeks. Just not in February.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:and what use is that? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      to paraphrase your comment "i'm an elitist troll because i'm good with languages, and because youre not you're automatically ignorant of the rest of the world".

      some of us are not so great with other languages, but are excellent with english, and thus prefer.. surprise, english cultural expression.

      we should not have to abandon our native language and customs for basic freedoms which should be guaranteed to us as citizens of modern, industrialized nations.

      as for living like a king, this proves how elitist and shallow you are. rather than stick around with a mediocre lifestyle in your native land, you abandon your own culture in order to lord your wealth over the native population in the region directly. at least people like me are kind enough to keep it to ourselves; and you wonder why there are anticapitalist revolutionaries in central american regions.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    3. Re:and what use is that? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      rather than stick around with a mediocre lifestyle in your native land, you abandon your own culture in order to lord your wealth over the native population in the region directly.

            Whatever. I guess you're free to stay in the same petri dish and make excuses for your miserable existence. What I fail to understand is your apparent need to insist that everyone else be like you. Neither you nor I chose the country of our birth. Patriotism is a fallacy. My original suggestion was along the lines of: if you don't like the rules in the country you live in, move to a country more to your liking.

            But sure, keep waving that maple leaf and insist that you are a true-blooded Canadian, despite the accident of your birth, and put up with whatever your government decides to take away from your life. Me, I prefer peace and quiet. Oh, and anti-capitalist revolutionaries are so 20th century, you know? Perhaps you should travel more.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:and what use is that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you live?

    5. Re:and what use is that? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      What I fail to understand is your apparent need to insist that everyone else be like you.


      where did you get this from? please don't invent things i supposedly said..

      Neither you nor I chose the country of our birth. Patriotism is a fallacy.


      it's not about patriotism, i was born native english, and unless you become an absolute virtuoso in another language/culture the subtlety of poetry and art will escape you. you lose more by moving to a non-english nation than giving the sellout governments of english nations the bird and keeping right on violating the bought laws. And before you say it, that does not make getting pissed about and crusading against those unjust laws improper.

      Me, I prefer peace and quiet.

      security over freedom, enjoy your "neither".
      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    6. Re:and what use is that? by macro187 · · Score: 1

      ...you're free to stay in the same petri dish and make excuses for your miserable existence...

      Neither you nor I chose the country of our birth. Patriotism is a fallacy. I've lived away from Canada for about 4 years now, so I know the feeling, and agree with you. If I see another maple leaf on a backpack, I'm going to throw up.

      ...put up with whatever your government decides to take away from your life... I think the idea of democracy is that we're supposed to be deciding what the government does, not the other way around. If that's not how it's working, we're supposed to do something about it. Canada's history is filled with people who have done something about it.

      You and I are lucky enough to have had the health, political freedom, diplomatic standing, and economic means to be able to just fly off wherever and whenever we wanted in the first place. If you've really done as much travelling as you say, then you'll know that only a VERY small percentage of the people in the world can do what we've done. Most can only dream of it (right after they finish dreaming about a good meal and clean water)

      Sometimes, if I think too hard about income tax, the need for block heaters, Afghanistan, Don Cherry, or Alberta, I just about throw up. Then I remember that if I really think it's that bad, I (unlike a lot of people in the world) have the freedom to walk down to the embassy any time and renounce my citizenship.

      That's usually when I go have a coke and a smile and shut the fuck up.
  37. Kneejerk response for The Great White North by Caffeinate · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure, but not as many Americans as it takes to screw up an Iraq exit policy. (Zing!)

    --
    Godless heathen.
  38. A belated April fool's joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please?

    If it isn't, you can bet sure as hell I'm going down to parliament with anyone else who's willing to protest the bill.

    Write to your MPs Canadians! It's already bad that the Americans AND Europeans adopted this bullshit, let's not let it happen again.

  39. Godwin's Law Warning! by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

    Why do I hear echoes of Neville Chamberlain in my head?
    Really, I don't think that we're under a Nazi regime, I equate it to more of a fascist concept.
    First, they tried to control the media, then they limited the speaking points of the individual ministers, then they limited the public demonstration of respect for our fallen soldiers (no lowering the flags for casualties in Afghanistan).
    Unca George must be SO proud!
    Except for the little thing about the trains running on time, the checklist is becoming much pretty complete.

  40. Good luck enforcing this by SilverBlade2k · · Score: 1

    I'll continue to download/rip movie rentals, and download the software to copy movies and music until they pry my computer from my dead hands

    1. Re:Good luck enforcing this by Graham+J+-+XVI · · Score: 0

      Here here!

    2. Re:Good luck enforcing this by Ghostalker474 · · Score: 1

      Same here... "from my cold, dead hands!"

    3. Re:Good luck enforcing this by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

      Q: What's black on the outside, red on the inside and pulling up to your curbside about now?
      A: Plainclothes RCMP in a Crown Vic.

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
  41. Not true about the mod-chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also have a hard drive in my PS2, and HD Loader for loading games off of the hard drive.

    It is NOT TRUE that you need a mod-chip to do this. HD Loader (and its clones) do the same security check the normal bootloader does, so any game for your region can be loaded without a mod-chip.

    You ONLY need the mod-chip if you want to run games from some other region... or "backups" (copies) of games. I do not have a mod-chip, since I only own and play North American region games on my PS2.

    Region coding is obviously anti-competitive bullshit and I fully support the *moral* stance for you to own and use a mod-chip to play games from other regions, provided you actually own those games. But don't mislead people into believing that running games from the hard drive is a necessary, legitimate use of a mod-chip.

    There are ONLY TWO REASONS to need a mod-chip: (1) so you can play games from other games, or (2) so you can play copies of games rather than originals. And if you use your mod-chip to play copies of games you don't actually own, then shame on you.

  42. Two weeks late and a toonie short by hkmarks · · Score: 1

    I wanted to say it in response to this story:
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/08/221222 5
    but I was too late.

    "In Soviet Canuckistan, intellectual property owns you!"

    Sorry.

  43. Silver Lining by rm69990 · · Score: 1

    A silver lining is that "fair dealing" (fair use Canada edition) will likely get an overhaul. It is currently very limited compared to what constitutes fair use in the united states.

  44. Why solve the problem? Just outlaw the cause! by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this has to be one of the greatest scams in human history next to religion.

    Got a problem? Make up an unenforceable law to combat it! It makes you look like you're actually doing something worthwhile without exerting any real effort. And, if anyone calls you on it, all you have to do is claim they must just be "light on crime" as a convinient dodge.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  45. But what's the point, then? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Somehow I doubt knowing that a gun was registered will help after the fact in a murder-suicide. What are the cops going to do, exhume the killer and re-bury them in jail?

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:But what's the point, then? by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      I know, that's why I said it was pointless.

      For hit&run, using your own registered weapon would be stupid... from this angle, the registry exposes honest gun owners to framing. Even worse, some people may end up "owning" a gun they've never seen or heard of until the police interrogates/jails them as the primary suspect after the weapon was used in a shoot-out/murder.

      So, not only is the registry unfit for its primary purpose, it can also be used to frame people by misleading police investigators.

  46. Is Dave Sim a local fixture? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    You live in Kitchener? Is Dave Sim a local fixture of wackiness, or is he enough of a hermit that even people who live there haven't heard of him?

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Is Dave Sim a local fixture? by jeevesbond · · Score: 1

      Just got here from England about 9 months ago. Am also a geek, so don't get out much, ergo I have no clue what you're talking about! :)

      Care to elaborate?

      --
      I'm going to transform myself into a mighty hawk. Either that or I'll just go and work at Dixons, haven't decided yet.
  47. If this passes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm moving to Sweden. I hear they have loveli lakes.

  48. Moving to Life+70 soon, then? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I suppose that next thing we know, Canada will be following in the footsteps of their Australian brethren and extending their copyright regime from Life+50 to Life+70. Someone should probably call up the Project Gutenberg Canada organizers and tell them never mind.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  49. Anti-"Americanism?" by multisync · · Score: 1

    That petty anti-Americanism that so many Canadians confuse with national pride might finally be put to some good use!


    And that continent so many USians confuse with their country might actually be the one Canadians call home.
    --
    I don't care why you're posting AC
    1. Re:Anti-"Americanism?" by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      our nation's name is the united states of america.. american is the most convenient term to call ourselves.

      or maybe we should adopt some silliness like "unitedstatesian", or "unitian", or maybe "of-ish"?

      enough with the pointless indignation about "american". people identify themselves by nation, not continent. if you ask a french person what he is he'll say french, if you ask a columbian person who he is he'll say columbian, and if you ask a citizen of the united states of america who he is he'll say "american".

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:Anti-"Americanism?" by multisync · · Score: 1

      I was having a bit of fun with the ignorance displayed by the poster I was replying to. Many people (many of them Canadians) get their panties in a knot when Canada doesn't toe the US line, or Canadians are critical of US policy or US politicians. They like to use that term "Anti-American," which is pretty stupid as Canadians, like citizens of the United States, Mexico and even Colombia, are all Americans.

      You sound like a proud American. Well so am I. I'm sorry there isn't a "convenient" word for citizens of your country to call themselves. Does that mean you just get to take American for your own? I don't think so.

      You go right ahead and call yourself an American. I'll do the same.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
  50. Oh Well... by grilled-cheese · · Score: 1

    So much for moving my internet radio station to Canada on May 15.

  51. Damn it! by crhylove · · Score: 1

    Now where am I going to move when they try to take my tinfoil hat?

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  52. Its war by partowel · · Score: 0

    Pure and simple.

    War.

    The big people want their money.

    The little people want to keep their money.

    This is an OLD model of economics.

    How to legally take people's money and make it look legal. But in reality its just protectionism.

    Laws keep the rich "rich" and the poor "poor".

    Hmmm....isn't human economics awesome????

    Oil, gas, food, free-energy, sex, houses, cars, etc, etc.

    This is never going to change.

    Until....armageddon.

    blah blah blah.

  53. Just because it's illegal... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    taxing illegal activities is illegal itself

    Not true; at least in the U.S., there are extant tax structures for things like marijuana, even though possessing it is illegal. They created a whole structure of tax stamps that you have to have on it, and I don't know if it was ever actually used before they just made all possession illegal. But the result is that if you get caught with a large quantity of marijuana, they could probably prosecute you for not having the correct tax stamps on it (since they're impossible to get, to my knowledge) in addition to the simple possession. They don't, because the penalties for possession are so draconian (did you know that drug possession in large quantities is a capital offense under Federal law?), but they could.

    The IRS also requires that income from illegal activities be reported on your tax return; arresting people involved in organized crime for tax evasion (for not reporting their illegal income) is pretty standard.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  54. It's okay to be geeky. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    It's okay that you're a geek; I'm a geek, which is why I've heard of him. Dave Sim is a comics artist who was the leading light of the self-publishing movement of the 1980s and 90s; he wrote and drew (with some help on the backgrounds) Cerebus the Aardvark for its entire three hundred issue run. He's one of the most brilliant minds to ever work in comics; he's unsurpassed in the inventiveness and quality of his lettering, in his writing of accents (and people with colds), in his panel layout, in his wit and satire.

    He's also slipped into more and more weirdness over the last ten years or so. He's started to believe that the visions he had in a schizophrenic break are religious inspiration, that the world is held in the thrall of a "feminist-homosexualist axis", and started his own religion which is some kind of syncretic mix of Christianity, Judaism and Islam. I haven't gotten to the end of Cerebus yet, but apparently it turned into Dave's pedantic internal monologue, which is a shame, since it was (and still is, at the point I'm reading it) extremely good. For some good essays about Sim's descent into--I use the word again only because it fits so well--weirdness, see Andrew Rilstone's essays on the subject. (Scroll down to "Aardvarks, and Other Comics".)

    On the bright side, he's arranged for the copyright to Cerebus to fall into the public domain following his death and that of Gerhard, his background artist, which is the sort of thing I wish more artists and authors would do. (And hey, that was almost on-topic.) Sim himself has said that he'll probably be more popular after he's died, given his talent for alienating people.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:It's okay to be geeky. by jeevesbond · · Score: 1

      I had a little read of his Wikipedia page and such. See what you mean about the weirdness, brilliance is always so close to insanity! One day I will read some of his material, although am not really a comic fan, probably why I'd never heard of him!

      --
      I'm going to transform myself into a mighty hawk. Either that or I'll just go and work at Dixons, haven't decided yet.
  55. three horse race by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    Three horse race? You are mistaking the one-party system of the US with our multi-party democracy. The greens are polling at what, 33% of the population these days? They will take seats, and they will represent a subset of the people of Canada in parliament. They, along with the NDP(and *gasp* the conservatives) will together, come to a consensus about what direction our country will go. It is not merely who is in power what is important, as we saw in the ndp-liberal budget, even smaller parties can have their say.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.